Skip to main content
Molecular Vision logoLink to Molecular Vision
. 2011 Feb 9;17:443–447.

Investigation of oxidative stress in pterygium tissue

Mehmet Balci 1,, Şemsettin Şahin 2, Fatih Mehmet Mutlu 3, Ramazan Yağci 4, Pınar Karanci 1, Metin Yildiz 1
PMCID: PMC3038211  PMID: 21321673

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate changes in the oxidant-antioxidant system in pterygium tissue.

Methods

Tissue samples ablated from 40 patients during pterygium surgery constituted the study material, while normal nasal conjunctiva tissue samples from 20 patients matched for age group (who had undergone surgery for strabismus or extracapsular cataract surgery) were used as controls. The samples were kept at −70 °C until the time of analysis. Catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) enzymatic activity and the levels of nitric oxide (NO) and malone dialdehyde (MDA) were studied in both groups.

Results

The mean age was 54.0±12 years in the pterygium patients and 49.0±19 in the controls (p=0.270). The enzyme activity levels were significantly lower in the pterygium group when compared to the controls (p<0.001 in each case), while in the same group a significant increase was observed in the MDA and NO levels (also p<0.001, in both cases).

Conclusions

These findings indicating oxidative stress in the pterygium tissue suggest that oxidative stress can play a role in pterygium etiopathogenesis.

Introduction

Pterygium is an epithelial hyperplasia characterized by the presence of fibro-vascular tissue, thought to be formed by the advancement of transformed conjunctival tissue into the cornea [1]. A role of ultraviolet (UV) radiation damage, irritation, or inflammation is hypothesized in its etiopathogenesis; the form, incidence, and distribution of pterygium support the possible role of UV radiation [2,3]. The peripheral focus theory [4,5] and the acute and chronic tissular inflammation that has been demonstrated to be an effect of UV radiation also support the thesis that such radiation is an important factor in the pathogenesis of pterygium [6-8].

UV radiation acts directly by phototoxicity or indirectly through free radicals (FR.) Intracellularly, the FR cause oxidative damage by acting on macromolecules such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. The FR, which consist principally of molecules like the superoxide anion (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and peroxynitrite (ONOO-), are detoxified by enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px.) The antioxidant system and the amount of FR are kept in a certain state of homeostasis. When exogenous or endogenous factors increase oxidative stress, homeostasis is disturbed and the FR denature many basic intracellular molecules like nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. As for malone dialdehyde (MDA), a product of the breakdown into their essential chains of mainly unsaturated fatty acids through the oxidation mechanism, MDA is accepted as a reliable marker of the lipid peroxidation that occurs as a result of oxidative stress.

It has been reported in recent times that certain growth factors, such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and cellular mediators like nitric oxide (NO), also play a role in the pathogenesis of pterygium [9,10]. It is also stated that NO, primarily secreted by the endothelium and hypothesized to play a role in vasodilation, neurotransmission, and inflammation, also takes part in vascular tonus, vascular permeability, and capillary vessel growth [9]. It has been observed to act as a protective antioxidant agent at physiologic doses, and when administered in large amounts it has oxidating and apoptotic properties and enhances VEGF production [11,12]. It is also known that UV radiation increases NO release also by non-enzymatic means [13]. All these observations concur to suggest that vasoproliferative processes and their contributing factors play a role in pterygium pathogenesis.

The presence of oxidative stress and of supporting data relative to NO does not mean that their role in the genesis of pterygium is clear yet [14,15]. The objective of our study is to expose observations on oxidative stress and changes in NO in both pterygium and the normal conjunctiva and investigate the role they play in the development of pterygium.

Methods

Between January 2005 and March 2006, subjects who underwent surgery for pterygium (Group I), and control subjects (Group II) in matching age groups who had been operated on for strabismus or cataracts and in whom conjunctiva samples were collected from the nasal limbus area, were included in the study. Patients who had already undergone eye surgery; those afflicted with ocular diseases such as glaucoma, uveitis, and dry eye syndrome; those with systemic disease such as diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis; those with chronic addictions including those to smoking and alcohol; and those with pterygium of the atrophic type were all excluded from the study. All tissue samples were collected with the patient's consent and the approval of the Hospital Ethical Committee. Pterygium surgery was performed by dissecting the pterygium head away from the cornea and excising it en bloc with the body. During the procedure, the conjunctiva was dissected and separated as well as possible from the subconjunctival fibrovascular tissue, aiming to thus avoid conjunctival changes initiated by the presence of subconjunctival tissues. All conjunctiva samples were kept at −70 °C until the performance of the biochemical investigations. The MDA and NO levels and the activity of SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px in the samples were then measured.

MDA levels were measured by using the reaction between MDA and Thiobutyric Acid-Reactive Substance (TBARS) at 90–95 °C, which produces a pink chromogen, followed 15 min later by the spectrophotometric reading at 532 nm of the absorbance in the samples submitted to accelerated cooling [16].

The determination of NO levels were essentially performed by the diazotization N-naphthylethylene diamine (NNDA) dependent on nitrite and sulfanilamide produced by the Griess reaction and the modified cadmium reaction, and spectrophotometrically measuring the color produced by this reaction [17] at 545 nm.

The measurement of SOD activity is based on the reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) by superoxide produced with the xanthine/xanthine oxidase system, following a modified version of the methods used by Sun et al. [18] and Durak et al. [19]. The absorbance of the resulting formazone was measured at 560 nm to determine the enzymatic activity.

GSH-Px activity was measured following the method communicated by Paglia et al. [20]. In the presence of hydrogen peroxide, GSH-Px catalyzes the oxidation of reduced glutathione to oxidized glutathione. The reduction in absorbance during the oxidation of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP) used in the reaction to NADP+ is measured to determine the enzymatic activity. CAT activity was determined by the Aebi method [21], by measuring at 240 nm the reduction in absorbance created by the decomposition (by CAT) of the added hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. The protein level of the supernatant was determined by Lowry's method [22]; MDA and NO levels were expressed as nmol/g protein, SOD activity as U/mg protein, CAT activity as k/g protein, and that of GSH-Px as U/g protein [21].

The software package SPSS 12.0 (SPSS for Windows, version 12.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analysis. Student's t-test was used to analyze continuous variables and the χ2 test was used to analyze categorical variables of the groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the groups and the measured enzymatic activity, and MDA and NO levels are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. There was no significant difference among the two groups as to age or sex distribution (Table 1). An important and statistically significant reduction in the enzymatic activity levels of SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px was observed in the study group as compared to those of the control group (p<0.001 for all three values.) The NO and MDA values in the study group were significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.001 for both).

Table 1. Demographic properties of the study population.

Demographic properties Pterygium Control p
Age
54±12.0
48±19.46
0.270¶
Sex
 
 
0.232§
Female
26
16
 
Male
14
4
 
Laterality
 
 
0.273§
Right eye
18
11
 
Left eye 22 9  

Values are given as mean±SD (¶: Student t-test; §: χ2).

Table 2. SOD, CAT, GSH-Px activities and MDA, NO levels.

Enzymes Pterygium Control p
SOD (U/mg protein)
0.0210±0.0051
0.0446±0.0073
0.000¶
CAT (k/g protein)
0.0890±0.0328
0.4382±0.0996
0.000¶
GSH-Px (U/g protein)
0.9255±0.2038
2.8360±0.4797
0.000¶
MDA (nmol/g protein)
12.2078±1.7552
7.7482±0.2681
0.000¶
NO (μmol/g protein) 0.7586±0.0538 0.0353±0.0037 0.000¶

Values are given as mean±SD (¶: Student t-test; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; CAT: Catalase; GSH-Px: Glutathione peroxidase; MDA: Malondialdehyde; NO: Nitric oxide.)

Discussion

The etiopathogenesis of pterygium is controversial. Even though there are many publications showing the influence of UV radiation [23-25], the role of the antioxidant system is still subject to discussion. We have determined in our study that, alongside the significant reduction in the enzymatic activity, there was a significant increase in the NO level. We think that these findings show the presence of oxidative stress in the etiology of pterygium and can contribute to earlier reports relative to NO [14,15].

It has been shown that the expression of NO, specifically that released by the endothelium and neuronal sources, can also be non-specifically activated by endotoxins and cytokines, and as a result that NO can be released in many different tissues [26,27]. Free oxygen radicals, diverse growth factors and cytokines, like cyto-oxygenase 2 (COX2), play a known role in skin cancers developing under the influence of UV radiation [28-32]. COX2 is a cytokine that plays a notable part in angiogenesis induced by inflammatory cytokines [33]. Chiang et al. [34] have shown the presence of COX2 in pterygial tissue and reported that it might play a role in the pathogenesis of pterygium. Studies in cornea and pterygium tissue samples have shown increases in cytokine and growth factor levels [23]. An increase in NO due to higher cytokine activity caused by UV radiation seems a possible mechanism; the increased activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) found in pterygium tissue also shows the presence of an enzymatic infrastructure for the NO increase [15]. Aside from all this, we should not forget that UV radiation can directly increase NO expression, by non-enzymatic means [13].

The NO increase that we found agrees with findings byother authors, especially Lee et al. [15]. The increase in serum and vitreous humor NO levels observed in diabetes and age-related macular degeneration, i.e., diseases dominated by vascular pathology and degeneration, also supports our findings [35,36]. It seems possible for high levels of NO to be a factor increasing oxidative stress by means of their oxidating and apoptotic influence [11,12,37]. Beside these influences, there are also studies showing that NO participates in angiogenesis. It was observed that angiogenesis induced by VEGF can be slowed in vivo by NO synthetase inhibition [38]. Papapetropoulos et al. [11] reported that NO participates in the angiogenic activity of VEGF. The observation by Marcovici et al. [10] of excessive quantities of VEGF in the pterygium tissue also indicates the presence of angiogenesis in the development of pterygium. Considering also that prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and substance-P (SP) also contribute to angiogenic response [38,39], there are many factors which could contribute to the increase in NO level in pterygium. While supporting the findings by Lee et al. [15] (increased iNOS), our study results are different than those reported by Özdemir et al. [14]. In contradiction to thesis that a low NO level could be related to the fact that NO is depleted by use as a protective agent against oxidative stress, and that it also could be a result of the use of the entire pterygial tissue instead of epithelium use only, Solomon [40] proposed that this fact might be the result of hyper‐irrigation of the blood by the rich vascular net of the pterygium. This is the opposite of the ischemic conditions [35,36] through which NO levels rise. The results obtained by Özdemir et al. [14] could also have been due to clinical variables, like the condition, atrophic or not, of the pterygia that had undergone surgery. We selected cases of non-atrophic, vascularized and inflammatory pterygium of the progressive type. The active angiogenesis in such cases could be one cause for our findings of high levels of NO. Information on the clinical appearance of the pterygium cases is not found in the report by Özdemir et al. [14]. Additionally, in our samples, we dissected away the subepithelial parts developing from the Tenon capsule to as great an extent possible, to keep them as similar as possible to the control samples. Our aim in this was to avoid contamination of our results by subconjunctival tissues subject to abnormal fibro-elastotic transformation. However, such a hypothesis remains to be tested, and a comparison of levels of VEGF and NO in pterygium samples that include or lack subconjunctival tissue must still be performed in advanced studies. One other possible reason for finding high NO levels in pterygium cases could be that NO is produced in excess as a protector against the oxidative stress related to UV radiation or chronic inflammation.

We observed other powerful indications, in our study, of the presence of oxidative stress in pterygium tissue. The oxidative stress showed itself in the increased level of MDA and the reduced activity of the enzymes SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px.

The fall in antioxidant enzyme activities could be correlated to the detoxification of the possibly increased number of oxidative stress molecules. It has been shown in many degenerative processes that changes in antioxidant enzyme activities accompany an increase in lipid peroxidation [41-43]. Also, in other experimental works, UV damage has been observed to cause an increase in the MDA level in the eye [44,45] and in other tissues [46], in correlation with a fall in antioxidant enzymatic activity and an increase in lipid peroxidation. The presence of oxidative stress in pterygium has been proved by finding an increase in 8-OHdG (8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine) [24]. The significant increase (p<0.001) in MDA, consistently accompanying significant decreases (p<0.001) in the activity of SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px in our study, leads us to think that oxidative stress is an important mechanism in the development of pterygium.

In this study, we evaluated NO, the antioxidant system enzymes, and lipid peroxidation together for the first time. Our results show that oxidative stress plays a role in the etiopathogenesis of pterygium. We cannot forget, however, that as much as UV radiation is an important factor in the pathogenesis of oxidative stress, chronic inflammation also plays a part in the development of this lesion, and oxidative stress can increase with inflammation. To conclude, oxidative stress and NO do play a role in the development of pterygium, and this complex process must be kept in mind in the prevention and treatment of pterygium.

References

  • 1.Coroneo MT, Di Girolamo N, Wakefield D. The pathogenesis of pterygia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10:282–8. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199908000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mackenzie FD, Hirst LW, Battistutta D, Green A. Risk analysis in the development of pterygia. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:1056–61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31850-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saw SM, Tan D. Pterygium: prevalence, demography and risk factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1999;6:219–28. doi: 10.1076/opep.6.3.219.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maloof AJ, Ho A, Coroneo MT. Influence of corneal shape on limbal light focusing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2592–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Coreneo MT, Müler-Stolzenburg NW, Ho A. Peripheral light focusing by the anterior eye and ophthalmohelioses. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22:705–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taylor HR, West SK, Rosenthal FS, Munoz B, Newland HS, Emmett EA. Corneal changes associated with chronic UV irradiation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:1481–4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020555039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schein OD. Phototoxicity and the cornea. J Natl Med Assoc. 1992;84:579–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cejkova J, Lojda Z. The damaging effect of UV rays below 320 nm on the rabbit anterior eye segment. II. Enzyme histochemical changes and plasmin activity after prolonged irradiation. Acta Histochem. 1995;97:183–8. doi: 10.1016/S0065-1281(11)80097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moncada S, Palmer RMJ, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology,and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marcovich AL, Morad Y, Sandbank J, Huszar M, Rosner M, Pollack A, Herbert M, Bar-Dayan Y. Angiogenesis in pterygium: morphometric and immunohistochemical study. Curr Eye Res. 2002;25:17–22. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.25.1.17.9959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Papapetropoulos A, Garcia-Cardena G, Madri JA, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide production contributes to the angiogenic properties of VEGF in human endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:3131–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI119868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chin K, Kurashima Y, Ogura T, Yoshida S, Esumi H. Induction of vascular endothelial growth factor by nitric oxide in human glioblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 1997;15:437–42. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Büyükafşar K, Levent A, Un I, Ark M, Arikan O, Ozveren E. Mediation of nitric oxide from photosensitive stores in the photorelaxation ofthe rabbit corpus cavernosum. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;459:263–7. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02858-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Özdemir G, İnanç F, Kılınç M. Investigation of nitric oxide in pterygium. Can J Ophthalmol. 2005;40:743–6. doi: 10.1016/S0008-4182(05)80092-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee DH, Cho HJ, Kim JT, Choi JS, Joo CK. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and inducible nitric oxide synthase in pterygia. Cornea. 2001;20:738–42. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200110000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Esterbauer H, Cheeseman KH. Determination of aldehydic lipid peroxidation products: Malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. In: Packer L, Glazer AN, editors. Methods in Enzymology, V 186, Oxygen radicals in biological systems. New York: Academic Press; 1990. p. 407–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cortas NK, Wakid NW. Determination of inorganic nitrate in serum and urine by a kinetic cadmium-reduction method. Clin Chem. 1990;36:1440–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun Y, Oberley LW, Ying L. A simple method for clinical assay of superoxide dismutase. Clin Chem. 1988;34:497–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Durak İ, Yurtarslanı Z, Canbolat O, Akyol O. A methodological approach to superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity assay based on inhibition of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction. Clin Chim Acta. 1993;214:103–4. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(93)90307-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterisation of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 1967;70:158–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aebi H. Catalase. In: Bergmeyer U, editor. Medhods of enzymatic analysis. New York and London: Academic Pres; 1974. p. 673–677. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Di Girolamo N, Coroneo MT, Wakefield D. UVB-mediated induction of interleukin-6 and −8 in pterygia and cultured human pterygium epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:3430–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsai YY, Cheng YW, Lee H, Tsai FJ, Tseng SH, Lin CL, Chang KC. Oxidative DNA damage in pterygium. Mol Vis. 2005;11:71–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perra MT, Maxia C, Corbu A, Minerba L, Demurtas P, Colombari R, Murtas D, Bravo S, Piras F, Sirigu P. Oxidative stress in pterygium: relationship between p53 and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1136–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nathan C. Inducible nitric oxide synthase: what difference does it make? J Clin Invest. 1997;100:2417–23. doi: 10.1172/JCI119782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fang FC. Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2818–25. doi: 10.1172/JCI119473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takashima A, Bergstresser PR. Impact of UVB radiation on the epidermal cytokine network. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;63:397–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murakami T, Fujimoto M, Ohtsuki M, Nakagawa H. Expression profiling of cancer-related genes in human keratinocytes following non-lethal ultraviolet B irradiation. J Dermatol Sci. 2001;27:121–9. doi: 10.1016/s0923-1811(01)00124-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fischer SM. Is cyclooxygenase-2 important in skin carcinogenesis? J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2002;21:183–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li D, Turi TG, Schuck A, Freedberg IM, Khitrov G, Blumenberg M. Rays and arrays: the transcriptional program in the response of human epidermal keratinocytes to UVB illumination. FASEB J. 2001;15:2533–5. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0172fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Herrlich P, Sachsenmaier C, Radler-Pohl A, Gebel S, Blattner C, Rahmsdorf HJ. The mammalian UV response: mechanism of DNA damage induced gene expression. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1994;34:381–95. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(94)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Majima M, Hayashi I, Muramatsu M, Katada J, Yamashina S, Katori M. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 enhances basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis through induction of vascular endothelial growth factor in rat sponge implants. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;130:641–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chiang CC, Cheng YW, Lin CL, Lee H, Tsai FJ, Tseng SH, Tsai YY. Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in pterygium. Mol Vis. 2007;13:635–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Evereklioğlu C, Er H, Doğanay S, Cekmen M, Türkoz Y, Otlu B, Özerol E. Nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation are increased and associated with decreased antioxidant enzyme activities in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003;106:129–36. doi: 10.1023/a:1022512402811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yilmaz G, Esser P, Kociok N, Aydin P, Heimann K. Elevated vitreous nitric oxide levels in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:87–90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00398-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim JC, Cheong TB, Park GS, Park MH, Kwon NS, Yoon HY. The role of nitric oxide in ocular surface diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:687–95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ziche M, Morbidelli L, Choudhuri R, Zhang HT, Donnini S, Granger HJ, Bicknell R. Nitric oxide synthase lies downstream from vascular endothelial growth factor-induced but not basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2625–34. doi: 10.1172/JCI119451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ziche M, Morbidelli L, Masini E, Amerini S, Granger HJ, Maggi CA, Geppetti P, Ledda F. Nitric oxide mediates angiogenesis in vivo and endothelial cell growth and migration in vitro promoted by substance. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:2036–44. doi: 10.1172/JCI117557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Solomon AS. Pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:665–6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.091413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McCall MR, Frei B. Can antioxidant vitamins materially reduce oxidative damage in humans. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;26:1034–53. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00302-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Elejalde Guerra JI. Oxidative stress, disease and antioxidant treatment. An Med Interna. 2001;18:326–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Marnett LJ. Oxy radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage. Toxicology. 2002;181–2:219–22. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(02)00448-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bardak Y, Özertürk Y, Özgüner F, Durmuş M, Delibaş N. Effect of melatonin against oxidative stress in ultraviolet-B exposed rat lens. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20:225–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cejková J, Stipek S, Crkovska J, Ardan T. Changes of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase in the corneal epithelium after UVB rays. Histochemical and biochemical study. Histol Histopathol. 2000;15:1043–50. doi: 10.14670/HH-15.1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mulero M, Romeu M, Giralt M, Folch J, Nogues MR, Fortuno A, Sureda FX, Linares V, Cabre M, Paternain JL, Mallol J. Oxidative stress-related markers and langerhans cells in a hairless rat model exposed to UV radiation. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006;69:1371–85. doi: 10.1080/15287390500471187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular Vision are provided here courtesy of Emory University and the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, P.R. China

RESOURCES