Skip to main content
PMC home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Nov 7;122(3):777–785. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0612-x

Targeting Breast Stem Cells with the Cancer Preventive Compounds Curcumin and Piperine

Madhuri Kakarala 1,3, Dean E Brenner 1,2,3, Hasan Khorkaya 1, Connie Cheng 1, Karim Tazi 1, Christophe Ginestier 1, Suling Liu 1, Gabriela Dontu 1, Max S Wicha 1
PMCID: PMC3039120  NIHMSID: NIHMS172393  PMID: 19898931

Abstract

Background

The cancer stem cell hypothesis asserts that malignancies arise in tissue stem and/or progenitor cells through the dysregulation or acquisition of self-renewal. In order to determine whether the dietary polyphenols, curcumin and piperine, are able to modulate the self-renewal of normal and malignant breast stem cells, we examined the effects of these compounds on mammosphere formation, on expression of the breast stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), and on Wnt signaling.

Design

Mammosphere formation assays were performed after curcumin, piperine and control treatment in unsorted normal breast epithelial cells and normal stem and early progenitor cells, selected by ALDH positivity. Wnt signaling was examined using a Topflash assay.

Results

Both curcumin and piperine inhibited mammosphere formation, serial passaging and percent of ALDH+ cells, by 50% at 5 μM and completely at 10 μM concentration in normal and malignant breast cells. There was no effect on cellular differentiation. Wnt signaling was inhibited by both curcumin and piperine by 50% at 5 μM and completely at 10μM.

Conclusion

Curcumin and piperine separately, and in combination, inhibit breast stem cell self renewal but do not cause toxicity to differentiated cells. These compounds could be potential cancer preventive agents. Mammosphere formation assays may be a quantifiable biomarker to assess cancer preventive agent efficacy and Wnt signaling assessment a mechanistic biomarker for use in human clinical trials.

Introduction

The cancer stem cell hypothesis asserts that malignancies arise in tissue stem and/or progenitor cells through the dysregulation or acquisition of self-renewal [1]. Stem cells are long lived and capable of acquiring multiple mutations over time to transform to malignancy while differentiated cells turn over rapidly [2]. Clonal expansion of stem cell populations through dysregulated self-renewal is, thus, hypothesized to be an early step in carcinogenesis [3]. This hypothesis is supported by recent studies demonstrating that breast tissue from women who carry germline BRCA1 mutations contains islands of cells which uniformly express the stem cell marker ALDH1. These expanded stem cell colonies display loss of heterozygosity for the normal BRCA1 allele [4,5]. Experimental knockdown of BRCA1 in normal mammary cells leads to an increase in the ALDH-positive stem cell population in vitro and in mouse models[5].

If primitive breast cells are the targets for transforming events, then interventions aimed at reducing this cell population may provide novel risk reduction strategies. Current strategies, which included prophylactic mastectomy for BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers, as well as the antiestrogens tamoxifen and raloxifene, all are associated with potential toxicities. These toxicities have limited the widespread utilization of Tamoxifen and raloxifene in cancer prevention [6,7]. Furthermore, hormonal interventions selectively prevent estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers, but are less effective, and may actually increase the development of ER negative breast cancers [8-10]. This highlights the important need to develop non-toxic strategies to effectively prevent both ER negative and ER positive breast cancer. If the cancer stem cell hypothesis is valid, then strategies aimed at targeting stem cell self-renewal pathways represent rational approaches for cancer prevention. One such pathway is the Wnt signaling pathway which is dysregulated in breast cancer, as well as many other malignancies [11-13]. Although the development of specific pharmacologic Wnt inhibitors has proved a challenge, there is evidence that curcumin, a dietary phenol found in spices, is able to downregulate the Wnt signaling pathway[14]. Interestingly, there is substantial evidence in preclinical models that curcumin is a potent chemopreventive dietary agent [15-19]. This suggests that the protective effects of curcumin might be due to Wnt inhibition of self-renewal in breast stem/progenitor cells.

Another dietary polyphenol, isolated from black and long peppers, which has been reported to reduce cancer incidence in chemical rodent models of lung cancer, is piperine[20-24]. It has been suggested that piperine may also enhance the bioavailability of curcumin if these chemopreventive agents are given in combination [25]. The cancer preventive effects of piperine, as a single agent, in breast carcinogenesis have not yet been explored.

In order to determine whether the dietary polyphenols, curcumin and piperine, are able to modulate the self-renewal of normal and malignant breast stem cells, we examined the effects of these compounds on mammosphere formation and on expression of the breast stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). We demonstrate that curcumin and piperine are able to inhibit breast stem cell self-renewal and provide evidence that these effects are mediated through inhibition of Wnt signaling. These studies suggest that stem cell self-renewal assays may serve as biomarkers for cancer prevention studies. Such assays also provide potential mechanisms for the action of dietary polyphenols as cancer preventive agents.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Curcumin 98% pure and piperine 99% pure were donated by Sabinsa Corporation (Piscataway, NJ). Both curcumin and piperine were prepared into 1 mM stock solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide for dissolution into cell culture media.

Human Normal Breast Tissue Dissociation

Normal breast tissue from women undergoing elective reduction mammoplasty who provided informed consent (University of Michigan IRBMED approved tissue collection protocol) was obtained through the Tissue Procurement Service with the Department of Pathology at University of Michigan Medical School. The tissue was mechanically and enzymatically dissociated by methods detailed by Dontu et al [2].

Mammosphere Formation Assay

Unsorted human breast epithelial single cells were plated in ultralow attachment plates (Corning Inc, Corning NY) at a density of 100,000 viable cells/ml in primary culture and 5000 cells/ml in passages. Primary mammospheres were allowed to form for 7-10 days in serum-free mammary epithelial basal medium (MEBM) (Cambrex Bio Science Walkersville, Inc, Walkerville, MD) with curcumin and/or piperine treatment for 4-72 hrs. Primary mammospheres were centrifuged (1000 rpm), dissociated with trypsin (Invitrogen), a 22 gauge needle (Fisher Scientific), and then sieved through a 40-μm sieve to obtain single cells. These sphere forming single cells, enriched for breast stem and early progenitor cells [2,4], were used for serial passage (secondary and tertiary sphere formation studies) and differentiation experiments to test the functional definition of stem cells to self renew and differentiate. Sphere number was counted manually and verified by two independent observers blinded to treatment. Each experiment was performed in triplicate wells per tissue and repeated using three separate tissues to account for intra and intertissue variability and findings averaged with standard error.

Breast Stem Cell Marker Testing

Breast stem cells were identified using Aldefluor (Stem Cell Technologies, Newark, NJ) according the method of Dontu et al. [2].

Curcumin and Piperine's Effect on Ability of Primary Sphere Forming Cells to Serially Passage

Unsorted single normal human breast epithelial cells were cultured in suspension in serum free media with curcumin alone at concentrations ranging from 5 μM to 25 μM, piperine alone at concentrations ranging from 5 μM to 25 μM or curcumin plus piperine compared to DMSO vehicle control and primary spheres collected, dissociated, and resuspended in MEBM to form secondary spheres. The secondary spheres were counted after 7 days, then, dissociated again and recultured to form tertiary spheres.

Differentiating Culture Conditions

Breast normal epithelial single cells dissociated from tertiary mammospheres to enrich for breast stem cells were plated on collagen-coated plates at a density of 2,000 viable cells/10 cm petri dish. Curcumin, with or without piperine, or dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle control (DMSO) were added first from the time of plating for 48 hrs treatment with triplicate plates per dose combination. In a second set of experiments, cells were allowed to attach for 48 hrs prior to treatment with curcumin and/or piperine and grown in Ham's F12 medium with FBS and growth factors as detailed elsewhere [2]. Colonies were allowed to form for 7 days, photographed and manually counted using a microscope with a counting grid by two independent observers.

ALDH1A1 Immunohistochemistry Staining to Assess Curcumin and Piperine Effect on Number of ALDH Positive Cells

We treated unsorted normal human single breast epithelial cells with curcumin, piperine and curcumin + piperine compared to DMSO vehicle control in 6 well ultralow attachment plates for 72 hours; then stained using the immunohistochemistry kit (Zymed) per manufacturer's instructions with ALDH1A1 primary antibody and biotinylated secondary antibody and streptavidin immunoperoxidase. ALDH1A1 cells were quantified using flourescence activated cell sorting (FACS) with 4′-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for viability assessment.

Immunohistochemistry

To assess lineage composition of the colonies, cells were fixed in the plates for 20 min in methanol, at 20° C, then, stained using Peroxidase Histostain-Plus and Alkaline-Phosphatase Histostain-Plus kits (Zymed), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The primary antibodies, epithelial specific antigen (ESA), and cytokeratin 18 for luminal cells, CD10 and cytokeratin 14 (Novocastra) for myoepithelial cells were used at the dilutions indicated by the manufacturer.

Curcumin and Piperine's Effect on Wnt Signaling

Mammosphere formation [26] was also examined in unsorted MCF7 and Sum 159 breast cancer cell lines in anchorage independent, serum free media conditions. β-catenin was detected in both human normal epithelial cells and MCF7 cell lines using immunohistochemical staining (rabbit monoclonal β-catenin primary antibody dilution 1:500 (Thermo Scientific)).

The effect of curcumin + piperine on Wnt signaling in breast cancer cell lines cells was examined by lentivirus delivered reporter assay systems (90% transfection efficiency) to stably infect MCF7 cells. The virus reporter assay uses a green fluorescence protein, GFP, and is driven by a Tcf/Lef promoter. The number of cells with activated Wnt pathway was quantified by flow cytometry analysis for GFP fluorescence in the presence and absence of treatment with curcumin, piperine or curcumin + piperine compared to DMSO vehicle control.

Results

Curcumin and Piperine Inhibit Mammosphere Formation

Our group, and others, have previously demonstrated that one of the properties of stem/progenitor cells is their ability to survive under anchorage independent conditions and generate mammospheres [12]. These mammospheres are composed of a small number of stem cells which self-renew, generating mammospheres on serial passage, as well as progenitor cells capable of multilineage differentiation [2]. We determined the effects of varying concentrations of curcumin on mammosphere formation. 5 μM curcumin inhibited mammosphere formation by 50% compared to DMSO control, while 10μM curcumin completely inhibited mammosphere formation. Piperine also inhibited mammosphere formation compared to controls but the effects were less pronounced than curcumin (Figure 1B, 1C, 1D). The addition of 10μM piperine to 5 μM of curcumin further reduced mammosphere formation compared to either agent separately. Furthermore, this decrease in mammosphere formation was not due to non-specific toxicity since cell viability, as determined by trypan blue exclusion at 5 μM curcumin was 89%. Piperine, when added alone, had a more modest effect on mammosphere number; but also resulted in a decrease in mammosphere size (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Figure 1A. Primary mammospheres formed from unsorted normal human breast epithelial cells in suspension culture for 10 days. Left picture incubation with curcumin 5 μM, right picture piperine 5 μM treament.

Figure 1B Primary mammosphere number (±SEM) formed from unsorted normal human breast epithelial cells in suspension culture with curcumin (C5= curcumin 5 μM, C10= curcumin 10 μM); 1C piperine treatment (P5= piperine 5 μM, and P10= piperine 10μM), 1D curcumin plus piperine treatment

Curcumin and Piperine Decrease Stem Cell Self-Renewal

We have previously shown that the ability of mammospheres to be serially passaged at clonal density is an indirect marker of stem cell self-renewal [2]. We, therefore, determined the effect of curcumin, piperine or their combination when added during primary mammosphere formation on the ability of these cells to be serially passaged in mammospheres at clonal density. The addition of 5 μM curcumin + 10 μM piperine to primary mammospheres inhibited the ability of cells isolated from these spheres to form secondary mammospheres by more than 50% compared to DMSO control. Furthermore, unlike DMSO controls, these cells were completely unable to form tertiary mammospheres. This suggests that curcumin and piperine affect breast stem cell self-renewal and that this process is irreversible since the removal of these compounds did not restore the ability of these cells to form mammospheres upon serial passage.

Curcumin and Piperine's Effect on Cellular Differentiation

Curcumin and piperine affect progenitor cell proliferation but do not affect cellular differentiation. The observation that piperine affected mammosphere size to a greater extent than mammosphere number (Figure 1A and 1C) suggested that this compound might affect progenitor cell proliferation. In order to examine this in more detail, as well as to determine the effects of curcumin and piperine on cellular differentiation, we treated mammospheres with these dietary polyphenols and then determined the proliferative and differentiation capacity of these cells by plating mammosphere–derived cells in attached cultures on collagen coated dishes in the presence of fetal calf serum. We have previously shown that progenitor cells differentiate into myoepithelial and luminal epithelial cells which can be identified by their cytokeratin expression [2]. Single cells derived from tertiary mammospheres were plated at clonal density on collagen coated dishes. 5 μM curcumin + 10 μM piperine were added for the first 48 hours of plating, at which point they were removed and cells were then cultured in the absence of these compounds for an additional 10 days. The addition of the dietary polyphenols resulted in a 50% reduction in the number of colonies formed. In contrast, when cells were allowed to attach and differentiate for 48 hours prior to treatment with curcumin and piperine, there was no difference in colony number compared to DMSO treated controls. Together with the data on mammosphere formation these studies suggest that the effects of curcumin and piperine are primarily on undifferentiated stem and progenitor cells rather than on more differentiated cells. Colonies generated at clonal density contained cells that were identified as luminal epithelial by CD 8 (red staining) or myoepithelial as identified by CK 14 (staining blue) or mixed containing both cell types. Addition of curcumin and piperine had no significant effect on the generation of these cell lineages.

Curcumin and Piperine Affect ALDH+ Stem/Progenitor Cells

The previous experiments suggested that curcumin and piperine effects were primarily on stem/progenitor rather than differentiated cell populations. We have previously demonstrated that both normal and malignant breast stem/progenitor cells can be enriched by virtue of their expression of ALDH as assessed by the Aldefluor assay [4]. We demonstrated that ALDH+, but not ALDH- cells, are capable of mammosphere formation and of generating mammary structures in the humanized fat pads of NOD/SCID mice [2,4]. In order to confirm that the effects of dietary polyphenols were on the primitive cell population, we isolated the ALDH+ component of primary human breast cells and examined the effect of polyphenols on mammosphere formation in this stem/progenitor enriched population. The addition of 5 μM curcumin and 5 μM piperine inhibited mammosphere formation by 50% compared to DMSO controls in this stem/progenitor enriched population. 10 μM curcumin and 10 μM piperine completely inhibited mammosphere formation in these cells. These studies provide further evidence for the enhanced sensitivity of stem/progenitor cells to curcumin + piperine.

Curcumin and Piperine Reduce the Percent of Cells Expressing the Stem Cell Marker ALDH1

To provide independent evidence that curcumin and piperine are able to reduce the stem cell populations, we examined the effects of these compounds on the proportion of breast cells expressing the stem cell marker ALDH1. The known effects of piperine on cellular transport precluded the use of the functional Aldefluor assay to assess ALDH expression post treatment with piperine. However, we have previously demonstrated that the predominant Aldefluor isoenzyme expressed in breast stem cells is ALDH-1A1 [4]. ALDH1 immunochemistry can thus be utilized to assess stem/progenitor cell number in normal and malignant breast tissue [4]. We determined the proportion of cells expressing ALDH-1A1 by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 3B, 10 μM curcumin reduced the proportion of ALDH-1A1 expressing cells from 7.3% to 1.5%. 10 μM piperine also decreased the percentage of ALDH-1A1 positive cells to 0.89% and the combination of curcumin and piperine further reduced ALDH-1A1 positive cells to 0.20% (Figure 3B). These results confirm the previous studies demonstrating that curcumin and piperine are able to effect mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Figure 3A. Primary mammosphere number formed from ALDH+ presorted normal human breast stem/early progenitor cells in suspension culture with curcumin and piperine treatment (C5=curcumin 5 μM, c10=curcumin 10 μM, P5= piperine 5 μM, and P10=piperine 10 μM) compared to DMSO vehicle and no treatment (NT controls)

Figure 3B Percent of ALDH1A1 positive cells after treatment of unsorted normal human breast epithelial cells with curcumin and piperine treatment

Curcumin and Piperine Inhibit Wnt Signaling

There is considerable evidence that the Wnt pathway regulates self-renewal in the breast, as well as other organs. In addition to canonical Wnt signaling, other signal transduction pathways, including Akt, may also regulate stem cell self-renewal through downstream Wnt signaling [27]. Furthermore, Wnt dysregulation results in mammary carcinogenesis in animal models and there is evidence for Wnt dysregulation in human breast tumors [11,13,28-32]. Previous studies have shown that curcumin inhibits Wnt signaling in other systems [33,34]. We, therefore, determined the effect of curcumin and piperine on Wnt signaling in well characterized breast cancer cell lines utilizing the TCF-Lef Topflash reporter system. Exposure to 10 μM curcumin for 12 hours, reduced GFP expression from 13% in DMSO vehicle controls to 0.89%, while 10 μM piperine inhibited GFP expression to 2.39% (Figure 4B). The combination of curcumin and piperine caused a further inhibition of GFP expression to 0.55%. These studies indicate the potent inhibitory effect on Wnt signaling of both curcumin plus piperine.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Figure 4A. Number of spheres formed from MCF7 or SUM 159 cells in suspension culture with 12 hrs. of curcumin and piperine treatment (C5=curcumin 5 μM;, C10=curcumin 10 μM; P5=piperine 5 μM; P10=piperine 10 μM; C5+P10=curcumin 5 μM and piperine 10 μM)

Figure 4B Green fluorescence positivity in MCF7 Topflash assay with curcumin and piperine treatment

Discussion

The cancer stem cell hypothesis proposes that cancers arise in tissue stem cells through dysregulation of the normally, tightly regulated process of self-renewal or in progenitor cells through acquisition of this capacity[1]. If stem/progenitor cells are targets for transformation, then strategies aimed at limiting these cell populations through inhibition of self-renewal represent rational cancer preventive strategies. Furthermore, since these interventions are based on the regulation of self-renewal, rather than the induction of toxicity, they have the potential of being less toxic than compounds such as tamoxifen which affect the bulk differentiated cell populations [10,35]. Our data suggest that the dietary polyphenols, curcumin and piperine may have these characteristics. We demonstrate that these dietary polyphenols affect normal stem/progenitor cells, as documented by decreased mammosphere formation upon serial passage and by decrease in the proportion of cells expressing the stem cell marker ALDH-1A1. In contrast, these compounds had little or no effect on differentiated cells. The relative lack of effect of these compounds on differentiated cells may account for their lack of toxicity in animal models and clinical studies [15,36].

Cancer preventive agents such as curcumin and other polyphenols have been shown to have pleiotrophic mechanisms of action, including NFκB suppression, Cox2 down regulation, and Wnt and Notch pathway downregulation [34,37-42]. We demonstrated that curcumin was able to inhibit Wnt signaling in MCF7 cells utilizing a TCF-Lef reporter assay system. These results support work in other systems showing the ability of curcumin to inhibit Wnt signaling [33,43,44], a pathway which we have previously demonstrated plays an important role in breast stem cell self-renewal and which is frequently dysregulated during breast carcinogenesis [11,12,31].

In addition to curcumin, we demonstrate that the dietary polyphenol piperine also is able to inhibit breast stem cell self-renewal and Wnt signaling. Previous studies have suggested that piperine could enhance curcumin's effects by enhancing bioavailability through inhibition of curcumin's efflux via P glycoprotein (ABCB1 or MDR1) efflux pump [45-47] as well as through the downregulation of NFκB release [48]. Our studies demonstrating that piperine affects mammosphere size and colony formation suggest that piperine may affect progenitor cell proliferation, as well as enhancing curcumin's effects on breast stem cell self-renewal.

Conclusions

If systemic bioavailability of curcumin can be improved to allow bioactive concentrations of curcumin and piperine in vivo, then this combination may serve as an effective cancer preventive intervention to limit stem cell self-renewal, since these cells, and dysregulation of self-renewal pathways, may be involved in carcinogenesis. Strategies aimed at reducing stem cell number and inhibiting their self-renewal could be an effective approach in cancer prevention. If this is the case, then assays such as mammosphere formation and ALDH expression may serve as biomarkers for cancer prevention studies in clinical trials. Curcumin, even at large doses, has been demonstrated to be non-toxic in clinical trials. Piperine has been shown in a small, phase I clinical trial to enhance the systemic bioavailability of curcumin [25]. However, a more systematic phase I trial with pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity endpoints of repeated dosing of these agents in combination is still needed. If proven safe and efficacious, dietary polyphenols could be an acceptable non-toxic long-term cancer risk reduction strategy.

Supplementary Material

Figure 5 Time of Exposure to curcumin necessary to downregulate mammosphere formation (C5=curcumin 5 μM;, C10=curcumin 10 μM; C10+P10=curcumin 5 μM and piperine 10 μM). Note that no spheres were formed at the C10+P10 concentrations.

Figure 6. β catenin staining in MCF 7 cells treated with curcumin and piperine.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Figure 2A. Secondary and Tertiary sphere formation from human normal single epithelial cells in suspension with curcumin and piperine

Figure 2B. Number of differentiated colonies formed from secondary sphere forming human breast stem cells with curcumin and piperine from time of plating versus treatment 48 hrs. after plating.

Figure 2C. Immunostaining for CK14 myoepithelial marker in blue and CK18 luminal marker in red and mixed differentiated colonies formed in the presence of curcumin and piperine

Acknowledgments

This work was performed with NIH T32 grant, Innovative Concepts in Stem Cell Research Foundation Grant, and NIH KL2 grant support. I am grateful to Sabinsa Co. for the donation of curcumin and piperine used in these experiments. The authors also wish to thank Irving L. Weissman (Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California) for providing the LEF-1/TCF reporter constructs.We wish to thank Samadhi Liyanage, and Dr. Shiv Kumar Dubey for their assistance with some experiments in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Al-Hajj M, Becker MW, Wicha M, Weissman I, Clarke MF. Therapeutic implications of cancer stem cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004;14:43–7. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, Kawamura MJ, Wicha MS. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1253–70. doi: 10.1101/gad.1061803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, Hart AH, Asselin-Labat ML, Gyorki DE, Ward T, Partanen A, Feleppa F, Huschtscha LI, Thorne HJ, Fox SB, Yan M, French JD, Brown MA, Smyth GK, Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med. 2009;15:907–13. doi: 10.1038/nm.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, Schott A, Hayes D, Birnbaum D, Wicha MS, Dontu G. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:555–67. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu S, Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Foco H, Kleer CG, Merajver SD, Dontu G, Wicha MS. BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1680–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711613105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cella D, Land SR, Chang CH, Day R, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Ganz PA. Symptom measurement in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) (P-1): psychometric properties of a new measure of symptoms for midlife women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:515–26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9682-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gennari L, Merlotti D, Paola VD, Nuti R. Raloxifene in breast cancer prevention. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2008;7:259–70. doi: 10.1517/14740338.7.3.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clarke R, Liu MC, Bouker KB, Gu Z, Lee RY, Zhu Y, Skaar TC, Gomez B, O'Brien K, Wang Y, Hilakivi-Clarke LA. Antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer and the role of estrogen receptor signaling. Oncogene. 2003;22:7316–39. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Howell A. The endocrine prevention of breast cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22:615–23. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Powles TJ. Prevention of breast cancer using SERMs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;630:232–6. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-78818-0_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lindvall C, Bu W, Williams BO, Li Y. Wnt signaling, stem cells, and the cellular origin of breast cancer. Stem Cell Rev. 2007;3:157–68. doi: 10.1007/s12015-007-0025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu S, Dontu G, Wicha MS. Mammary stem cells, self-renewal pathways, and carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:86–95. doi: 10.1186/bcr1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang W, Yan HX, Chen L, Liu Q, He YQ, Yu LX, Zhang SH, Huang DD, Tang L, Kong XN, Chen C, Liu SQ, Wu MC, Wang HY. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling contributes to activation of normal and tumorigenic liver progenitor cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4287–95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park CH, Hahm ER, Park S, Kim HK, Yang CH. The inhibitory mechanism of curcumin and its derivative against beta-catenin/Tcf signaling. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:2965–71. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bachmeier B, Nerlich AG, Iancu CM, Cilli M, Schleicher E, Vene R, Dell'Eva R, Jochum M, Albini A, Pfeffer U. The chemopreventive polyphenol Curcumin prevents hematogenous breast cancer metastases in immunodeficient mice. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2007;19:137–52. doi: 10.1159/000099202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bachmeier BE, Mohrenz IV, Mirisola V, Schleicher E, Romeo F, Hohneke C, Jochum M, Nerlich AG, Pfeffer U. Curcumin downregulates the inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and -2 in breast cancer cells via NFkappaB. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:779–89. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chuang SE, Kuo ML, Hsu CH, Chen CR, Lin JK, Lai GM, Hsieh CY, Cheng AL. Curcumin-containing diet inhibits diethylnitrosamine-induced murine hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:331–5. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.2.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang MT, Lou YR, Ma W, Newmark HL, Reuhl KR, Conney AH. Inhibitory effects of dietary curcumin on forestomach, duodenal, and colon carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Res. 1994;54:5841–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang MT, Newmark HL, Frenkel K. Inhibitory effects of curcumin on tumorigenesis in mice. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1997;27:26–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bhardwaj RK, Glaeser H, Becquemont L, Klotz U, Gupta SK, Fromm MF. Piperine, a major constituent of black pepper, inhibits human P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;302:645–50. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.034728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pradeep CR, Kuttan G. Piperine is a potent inhibitor of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB), c-Fos, CREB, ATF-2 and proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in B16F-10 melanoma cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2004;4:1795–803. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pradeep CR, Kuttan G. Effect of piperine on the inhibition of lung metastasis induced B16F-10 melanoma cells in mice. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2002;19:703–8. doi: 10.1023/a:1021398601388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Selvendiran K, Banu SM, Sakthisekaran D. Protective effect of piperine on benzo(a)pyrene-induced lung carcinogenesis in Swiss albino mice. Clin Chim Acta. 2004;350:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Selvendiran K, Prince Vijeya Singh J, Sakthisekaran D. In vivo effect of piperine on serum and tissue glycoprotein levels in benzo(a)pyrene induced lung carcinogenesis in Swiss albino mice. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2006;19:107–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shoba G, Joy D, Joseph T, Majeed M, Rajendran R, Srinivas PS. Influence of piperine on the pharmacokinetics of curcumin in animals and human volunteers. Planta Med. 1998;64:353–6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-957450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang MZ, Zhang FC, Zhang YY. Influence factors on the formation of mammospheres from breast cancer stem cells. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2008;40:500–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Korkaya H, Paulson A, Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Brown M, Dutcher J, Clouthier SG, Wicha MS. Regulation of mammary stem/progenitor cells by PTEN/Akt/beta-catenin signaling. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cho RW, Wang X, Diehn M, Shedden K, Chen GY, Sherlock G, Gurney A, Lewicki J, Clarke MF. Isolation and molecular characterization of cancer stem cells in MMTV-Wnt-1 murine breast tumors. Stem Cells. 2008;26:364–71. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Katoh M. Networking of WNT, FGF, Notch, BMP, and Hedgehog signaling pathways during carcinogenesis. Stem Cell Rev. 2007;3:30–8. doi: 10.1007/s12015-007-0006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kwan H, Pecenka V, Tsukamoto A, Parslow TG, Guzman R, Lin TP, Muller WJ, Lee FS, Leder P, Varmus HE. Transgenes expressing the Wnt-1 and int-2 proto-oncogenes cooperate during mammary carcinogenesis in doubly transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:147–54. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.1.147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Turashvili G, Bouchal J, Burkadze G, Kolar Z. Wnt signaling pathway in mammary gland development and carcinogenesis. Pathobiology. 2006;73:213–23. doi: 10.1159/000098207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ugolini F, Charafe-Jauffret E, Bardou VJ, Geneix J, Adelaide J, Labat-Moleur F, Penault-Llorca F, Longy M, Jacquemier J, Birnbaum D, Pebusque MJ. WNT pathway and mammary carcinogenesis: loss of expression of candidate tumor suppressor gene SFRP1 in most invasive carcinomas except of the medullary type. Oncogene. 2001;20:5810–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jaiswal AS, Marlow BP, Gupta N, Narayan S. Beta-catenin-mediated transactivation and cell-cell adhesion pathways are important in curcumin (diferuylmethane)-induced growth arrest and apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:8414–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ryu MJ, Cho M, Song JY, Yun YS, Choi IW, Kim DE, Park BS, Oh S. Natural derivatives of curcumin attenuate the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway through down-regulation of the transcriptional coactivator p300. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moen MD, Keating GM. Raloxifene: a review of its use in the prevention of invasive breast cancer. Drugs. 2008;68:2059–83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868140-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lao CD, Ruffin MTt, Normolle D, Heath DD, Murray SI, Bailey JM, Boggs ME, Crowell J, Rock CL, Brenner DE. Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006;6:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aggarwal BB, Banerjee S, Bharadwaj U, Sung B, Shishodia S, Sethi G. Curcumin induces the degradation of cyclin E expression through ubiquitin-dependent pathway and up-regulates cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p27 in multiple human tumor cell lines. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:1024–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aggarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC. Anticancer potential of curcumin: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:363–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Anuchapreeda S, Leechanachai P, Smith MM, Ambudkar SV, Limtrakul PN. Modulation of P-glycoprotein expression and function by curcumin in multidrug-resistant human KB cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2002;64:573–82. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(02)01224-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aravindan N, Madhusoodhanan R, Ahmad S, Johnson D, Herman TS. Curcumin inhibits NFkappaB mediated radioprotection and modulate apoptosis related genes in human neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008;7:569–76. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.4.5534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Binion DG, Otterson MF, Rafiee P. Curcumin inhibits VEGF-mediated angiogenesis in human intestinal microvascular endothelial cells through COX-2 and MAPK inhibition. Gut. 2008;57:1509–17. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.152496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Z, Zhang Y, Banerjee S, Li Y, Sarkar FH. Notch-1 down-regulation by curcumin is associated with the inhibition of cell growth and the induction of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer. 2006;106:2503–13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Prasad CP, Rath G, Mathur S, Bhatnagar D, Ralhan R. Potent growth suppressive activity of curcumin in human breast cancer cells: Modulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Chem Biol Interact. 2009;181:263–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ryu MJ, Cho M, Song JY, Yun YS, Choi IW, Kim DE, Park BS, Oh S. Natural derivatives of curcumin attenuate the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway through down-regulation of the transcriptional coactivator p300. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377:1304–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chearwae W, Anuchapreeda S, Nandigama K, Ambudkar SV, Limtrakul P. Biochemical mechanism of modulation of human P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) by curcumin I, II, and III purified from Turmeric powder. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:2043–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Limtrakul P, Chearwae W, Shukla S, Phisalphong C, Ambudkar SV. Modulation of function of three ABC drug transporters, P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), mitoxantrone resistance protein (ABCG2) and multidrug resistance protein 1 (ABCC1) by tetrahydrocurcumin, a major metabolite of curcumin. Mol Cell Biochem. 2007;296:85–95. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9302-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol Pharm. 2007;4:807–18. doi: 10.1021/mp700113r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Singh S, Khar A. Biological effects of curcumin and its role in cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2006;6:259–70. doi: 10.2174/187152006776930918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure 5 Time of Exposure to curcumin necessary to downregulate mammosphere formation (C5=curcumin 5 μM;, C10=curcumin 10 μM; C10+P10=curcumin 5 μM and piperine 10 μM). Note that no spheres were formed at the C10+P10 concentrations.

Figure 6. β catenin staining in MCF 7 cells treated with curcumin and piperine.

NIHMS172393-supplement-supplement_1.pdf (138.4KB, pdf)

RESOURCES