Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2010 Nov 23;104(1):138–145. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606017

Overexpression of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA in head and neck cancer: association with tumour development and progression

J-W Kornfeld 1,6, S Meder 1, M Wohlberg 2, R E Friedrich 2, T Rau 3, L Riethdorf 4, T Löning 5, K Pantel 1, S Riethdorf 1,*
PMCID: PMC3039790  PMID: 21102583

Abstract

Background:

TACE/ADAM17 is a transmembranous protease that cleaves membrane-bound growth factors like EGFR ligands. TACE-dependent proteolysis is regulated by its inhibitor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP3). This study analyses the role of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNSCCs).

Methods:

We analysed TACE and TIMP3 mRNA expression in HNSCCs from 106 patients by RNA in situ hybridisation.

Results:

TACE mRNA was upregulated in HNSCCs compared with dysplastic (P<0.05) and normal epithelia (P<0.001), with strong hybridisation signals in 21.9% of invasive tumour tissues and 4.5% of dysplasia. Elevated mRNA levels were accompanied by increased amounts of TACE protein in HNSCCs. TIMP3 mRNA expression in HNSCC-associated stroma was significantly higher than in the stroma adjacent to dysplastic or normal epithelia. Expression of TACE mRNA in HNSCCs was associated with tumour stage (P=0.019) and regional lymph node metastasis (P=0.009). Furthermore, levels of TACE mRNA in HNSCCs correlated with the expression of TIMP3 mRNA in HNSCC-associated stroma. Concomitantly, patients expressing high levels of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA showed significantly reduced overall survival compared with those with low mRNA levels.

Conclusion:

Our results indicate an important role of TACE and TIMP3 during development and progression of HNSCCs.

Keywords: TACE, TIMP3, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC)

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide (Wong et al, 1996). Treatment consists of surgery and/or radiotherapy and increasingly chemoradiation, and is associated with reduced speech, swallowing and quality of life. Unfortunately, the 5-year survival rates have not significantly improved in the last two decades and are still ∼50%. The poor prognosis, among others, reflects the limited understanding of the (molecular) mechanisms of HNSCC carcinogenesis itself as well as the lack of reliable HNSCC biomarkers. In many affected patients, recurrences can be found locally or regionally – associated with a high rate of mortality (Woolgar, 2006). Lymph node metastasis strongly correlates with tumour recurrence (Shah, 1990), and treatment failure is often related to growth of disseminated tumour cells either locoregionally causing locoregional recurrences or in lymph nodes outside the original field of treatment (Pantel and Brakenhoff, 2004; Woolgar, 2006).

Invasive growth of tumours is dependent on the degradation of surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), reflecting dysregulated equilibrium between expression, activation, inhibition and recycling of proteolytic enzymes. The ADAMs (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase) are members of the metzincin (zinc-dependent metalloproteases) superfamily (Kheradmand and Werb, 2002) and are structurally highly related to matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Currently, >30 ADAM proteins have been characterised, exhibiting functions in fertilisation, neurogenesis and cancer. The ADAMs are characterised by a typical multi-domain architecture (reviewed in Primakoff and Myles, 2000), and some ADAMs exhibit ‘sheddase’ activity; that is, membrane-tethered precursors of cytokines, adhesion molecules and growth factors may be proteolytically ‘shed’ into the extracellular environment. Although an association of MMP expression with tumour cell invasion and metastasis has been demonstrated for a number of malignancies (reviewed in Egeblad and Werb, 2002), there is also increasing evidence for a causal role of ADAM proteins in carcinogenesis and tumour progression (Duffy et al, 2009).

The putative role of TACE (tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α converting enzyme), an enzymatically active member of the ADAM sheddase family (ADAM17), during carcinogenesis has been attributed to its ability to shed membrane-tethered molecules crucial for tumour initiation and progression such as TNF-α (Black et al, 1997), L-selectin (Peschon et al, 1998), ALCAM (Rosso et al, 2007) transforming growth factor (TGF)-α (Kenny and Bissell, 2007) or type I TGF-β receptor (Liu et al, 2009). Clinically, a potential role for TACE has been proposed for breast, colon, prostate, hepatocellular and ovarian or endocrine cancers (Borrell-Pages et al, 2003; Karan et al, 2003; Ding et al, 2004; Blanchot-Jossic et al, 2005; Tanaka et al, 2005; Kirkegaard et al, 2008; McGowan et al, 2008). Intriguingly, TACE possesses a broad substrate spectrum of growth factor and cytokine substrates, whose cleavage leads to activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling cascade (e.g., TGF-α and amphiregulin) (Yarden, 2001; Sunnarborg et al, 2002; Wang et al, 2009). Furthermore, TACE activity also links extracellular G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation to intracellular EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation (Gschwind et al, 2003). Very recent results indicate that TACE regulates EGFR expression through the activation of Notch-1 in non-small cell lung cancer (Baumgart et al, 2010). Collectively, an upregulation of TACE-mediated sheddase activity would thus lead to elevated EGFR-derived oncogenic drive in cancer cells, as it is widely accepted that triggering the EGFR downstream cascade is crucial for carcinogenesis (Yarden, 2001; Ford and Grandis, 2003). This holds true especially for HNSCCs (Ang et al, 2002). Physiologically, the proteolytic activity of ADAM family members is mainly regulated by its physiological inhibitor, the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP3) (Amour et al, 1998; Baker et al, 2002; Walker and Rosenberg, 2009).

The aim of this study was to analyse the expression of TACE mRNA in a series of 106 HNSCC specimens by RNA in situ hybridisation. This is the first study relating TACE mRNA expression in HNSCC to the amount of mRNA specific for TIMP3, the primary inhibitor of TACE protease activity in vitro and in vivo. Our results show that TACE mRNA is upregulated in the majority of human HNSCCs in comparison with their parental epithelia. Furthermore, high levels of TACE mRNA are associated with an increased likelihood of metastasis into regional lymph nodes, high tumour stage, strong stromal TIMP3 expression and reduced overall survival of HNSCC patients.

Materials and methods

Patients

Paraffin-embedded HNSCCs from 106 consecutive patients were selected following histological review from the files of the Department of Oral Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. This study was approved by the local ethics committee. All lesions collected between 1997 and 2004 were classified according to the most recent WHO criteria. Tumours represent primary tumours and originated predominantly from the floor of mouth (30.2%), tongue (35.1%), buccal mucosa (6.8%), upper or lower jaw (6.8%) or the palate (12.2%). Remaining tumours were localised at maxillary or mandibular gingivae, lips or in the oropharynx. The control group consisted of 10 tissue specimens from patients with non-neoplastic, inflammatory disorders of the oral cavity. In addition, snap-frozen human HNSCC samples and adjacent normal tissues were available for immunoblot analysis. Follow-up data were available from 95 patients. The maximal duration of monitoring was 10 years. Median observation time was 29 months. Out of 95 patients, 29 (30.5%) succumbed to the disease. The median survival time of deceased patients was 11 months.

Cell lines and cell culture

The HNSCC cell line, JCRB 1027 SAT, was obtained from the Japan Health Science Foundation, Health Science Research Resources Bank. The other HNSCC cell lines were kindly provided by Professor RH Brakenhoff (Department of Otolaryngology/Head-Neck Surgery, VUMC Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (Carey et al, 1990; Hermsen et al, 1996; de Nooij-van Dalen et al, 2003; van Zeeburg et al, 2005). Cells were grown as monolayers in DMEM medium (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Pasching, Austria) and 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen) at 37 °C in a humidified 10% CO2 atmosphere.

Antibodies

The goat polyclonal anti-human antibody sc-6416 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) was raised against the C-terminus of human TACE. The monoclonal mouse anti-human EGFR antibody, clone E30, was raised against the purified, denatured EGFR (Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark). Mouse monoclonal antibody sc-7298 (Santa Cruz) was raised against the C-terminus of human heat shock cognate protein 70 (HSC-70). Horseradish-peroxidase (HRP) coupled goat-anti-mouse and rabbit-anti-goat antibodies (Dako Cytomation) were used as secondary antibodies.

Generation of digoxigenin-labelled cRNA probes

Total RNA was extracted from the human HNSCC cell lines VUSCC-OE and UMSCC-14C using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and transcribed into cDNA using oligo-dT-primed RT–PCR (Invitrogen).

The following primers corresponding to nucleotides 2748–2772 and 3473-3494 of TACE mRNA (GenBank: NM_003183.4) were used to amplify a 746-bp fragment: forward: 5′-GGGAAGTGACTTAGCAGATGCTGG-3′, reverse: 5′-TCCAAGTGCTGGGATTACAGGC-3′.

To amplify a 445-bp fragment, the following primers corresponding to nucleotides 1448–1472 and 1870–1893 of human TIMP3 mRNA (GenBank: NM_000362.4) were used: forward: 5′-GAGAGTCTCTGTGGCCTTAAGCTGG-3′ reverse: 5′-CTGGGAAGAGTTAGTGTCCAAGGG-3′.

PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation for 4 min at 94 °C, followed by 34 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min (denaturation), 64 °C for 1 min (annealing) and 72 °C for 1 min (elongation). The PCR product was analysed on a 1% agarose gel; desired bands were excised and purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The isolated DNA was cloned into a pCRII-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) following the vendor's instructions and the correctness of the insert was confirmed by sequencing. The vector was linearised using BamHI or XhoI restriction digest to yield anti-sense or sense probes, respectively.

To obtain cRNA probes from each strand of the cloned sequence, T7 or SP6 polymerases were used. cRNA probes were labelled with digoxigenin using a digoxigenin RNA labelling kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's information.

Probes were hydrolysed under alkaline conditions to facilitate probe penetration into tissue. To determine the incubation time necessary for cleavages resulting in a desired length of ∼200 bp, the following calculation was carried out: t=(Li–Lf)/(k × Li × Lf), with t=time in min, Li=initial length in Kb, Lf=final length of ∼200 bp, and k=constant 0.11 cuts Kb–1 min–1. For hydrolysis, the probe was suspended in 100 μl of dH2O and 60 μl of 0.2 M Na2CO3 and 40 μl of 0.2 M NaHCO3 were added before incubation at 60 °C for the time span calculated. After stopping the reaction by adding 10 μl of 10% glacial acetic acid and 22 μl of 3 M NaAc, pH 6.0, RNA was precipitated by adding 2 μl of tRNA, 2.4 μl of 1 M MgCl2 and 600 μl of ice-cold ethanol. Finally, labelled probes were dissolved in 100 μl Aqua bidest and the digoxigenin-labelling efficiency was determined by dot blotting.

In situ hybridisation

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinised in p-xylene and subsequent washes in graded ethanol. All solutions were prepared with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated H2O to inactivate RNAse activity and prevent RNA degradation. To facilitate accessibility of target mRNA, two initial steps using 0.2 N HCl for 20 min and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min were performed. Target mRNA-bound nucleoproteins were removed by proteinase K incubation (5 μg ml–1 for 30 min at 37 °C). Subsequently, the proteinase K activity was quenched via treatment with 0.2% (w/v) glycine for 5 min at 4 °C. Incubation in 4% ice-cold paraformaldehyde (w/v in PBS) ensured proper fixation of tissue onto slides. Acetylation (5 μl ml–1 acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanoleamine) reduced unspecific background signals. Before hybridisation, slides were dried at 50 °C for 1 h. In an initial step (prehybridisation), the slides were immersed in hybridisation buffer (50% deionised formamide; 1 × Denhardt's solution; 100 μg ml–1 Poly-A solution; 500 μg ml–1 salmon sperm DNA; 500 μg ml–1 t-RNA) for 2.5 h at 52 °C to block unspecific binding. Hybridisation was performed for at least 6 h at 52 °C in hybridisation buffer containing 10% dextran sulphate with a final amount of 50 ng cRNA-DIG probe per slide. Washes with increasing stringency were performed (2 × SSC at RT for 15 min; 1 × in formamide solution (50% Tris-buffered formamide containing 0.3 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 10 mM DTT) at 60 °C for 10 min; 2 × SSC at RT for 3 min; 0.1 × SSC at 52 °C for 15 min; 0.1 × SSC at RT for 10 min). To further remove unbound cRNA probe, the tissue was subjected to RNAse A (0.5 μl ml–1) digestion for 30 min. Specifically bound cRNA probe was detected using an anti-DIG-antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase with nitroblue tetrazolium chloride/X-phosphate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (NBT/BCIP) (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) as chromogenic substrate. After an appropriate incubation time the reaction was stopped and sections were counterstained with 1% Nuclear Fast Red dye (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA), dehydrated using an ascending ethanol concentration chain and p-xylene and finally mounted using Entellan mounting media (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

Semiquantitative analysis of in situ hybridisation signals

In situ hybridisation signals were evaluated using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 light microscope (Göttingen, Germany). Slides were assessed by a board-reviewed pathologist (LR) and two investigators (JWK and SR) independently and blinded to the clinical details of the case. Questionable results were evaluated again until consent was reached. The intensity of TACE/TIMP3 in situ hybridisation scores in the tumour was determined semiquantitatively according to the following criteria: TACE/TIMP3−=no signal, TACE/TIMP3+=weak, TACE/TIMP3++=moderate and TACE/TIMP3+++=strong. Furthermore, the frequency of positive cells was determined. Histologically discriminable epithelia like normal epithelium (NE), dysplastic epithelium (DE) and stromal areas (STR) adjacent to the invasive tumour were similarly quantified. For subsequent survival analysis and correlation with clinicopathological parameters, in situ hybridisation scores in HNSCCs were grouped into only two categories: TACElo, comprising TACE− to TACE++ mRNA signals; and TACEhi, only TACE+++ signals in at least 30% of tumour cells. The intensity of TIMP3 mRNA in stromal tissues adjacent to the tumour was also grouped into two categories: TIMP3lo, no signals or signals of weak intensity in stromal cells; and TIMPhi, moderate to strong TIMP3 hybridisation signals of stromal cells.

Immunohistochemistry

After deparaffinisation, tissue sections were pretreated with proteinase K (DAKO) and subsequently endogenous peroxidase was blocked in 0.03% hydrogen peroxide. Anti-EGFR antibody was applied (1 : 100 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. Immunostaining was developed using the peroxidase-labelled polymer and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate-chromogen solution. Nuclei were counterstained with haemalaun.

Immunoblot analysis

The detailed methodology is described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To test the significance of differences among groups of clinicopathological parameters, data were analysed using two-sided Fisher's exact or χ2 test. Upregulation of TACE or TIMP3 mRNA in situ hybridisation score was shown using the two-sided sign test. The significance level was defined as P<0.05. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of uncensored cases was performed using SPSS.

Results

Expression of TACE mRNA

In a hypothesis-driven approach, we determined the expression levels of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA by in situ hybridisation in a training set comprising a series of commercially supplied histopathologically defined HNSCC specimens (HNSCC tissue micro array; US Biomax, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). Interestingly, the intensity of TACE or TIMP3 mRNA tended to be associated with higher tumour stages (T-status) in this group of 57 evaluable carcinomas (P=0.067 or 0.09, respectively; Supplementary Table S1). Prompted by this, we aimed to corroborate our findings in a defined set of archived paraffin-embedded tissue from a cohort of 106 HNSCC patients.

Hybridisation signals specific for TACE were found throughout the oral mucosa with varying intensities between specimens and tissues (Supplementary Table S2, Figure 1A and C). In situ hybridisation with the control sense riboprobe yielded no signals (Figure 1B and D). Signals also disappeared when samples underwent an additional RNAse treatment (not shown). Hybridisation signals specific for TACE were also found in non-epithelial cells like vessel endothelial cells and lymphocytes (not shown). Histologically NE adjacent to HNSCC was either negative for TACE mRNA (71.9%, Figure 1E) or expressed it only weakly (25%) to moderately (3.1%). Samples of patients suffering from non-cancerous, inflammatory diseases of the oral cavity displayed comparable levels of TACE mRNA in NE (not shown). In contrast, only a few cases of DE adjacent to the tumours were negative for TACE mRNA (27.3%); weak (31.8%) to intermediate (36.4%) hybridisation signals were predominant (Figure 1A). Only a small number of patients expressed high levels of TACE mRNA in DE (4.5%). A comparable percentage of HNSCCs was negative for TACE mRNA (19.0%), and similarly the majority of tumours displayed weak (22.9%) to intermediate (36.2%) signals. A considerable number of tumours, however, exhibited high amounts of TACE mRNA (21.9%, Figure 1C), thus clearly differing in signal intensity from dysplastic areas (Figure 1A). Stroma associated with HNSCC was predominantly negative for TACE-specific hybridisation signals (74%, Supplementary Table S2) and showed, if any, weak (23%) or moderate (3%) amounts of TACE mRNA. The upregulation of TACE mRNA in HNSCC compared with NE (P<0.001, Figure 2A) and DE (P<0.05, Figure 2A) was statistically significant. Finally, DE exhibited elevated levels of TACE mRNA compared with NE (P<0.001, Figure 2B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

TACE and TIMP3 mRNA expression were detected by RNA in situ hybridisation (A–I, hybridisation signals: blue). (A) Moderate TACE mRNA expression in dysplastic epithelium and (C) strong TACE hybridisation signals in HNSCC. (E) No TACE mRNA expression in normal epithelium. Control riboprobes in sense orientation against TACE ((B) control to (A), (D) control to (C), and TIMP3 (H) to (G)) yielded no signals. Moderate to strong TIMP3 mRNA-specific signals are found in dysplastic epithelium (F), in HNSCC (G) and stromal areas adjacent to HNSCC (I). EGFR protein detected by immunohistochemistry (J–L). EGFR protein is highly expressed in basal and parabasal cells of normal epithelium (J), dysplastic (K) and HNSCC (L) epithelia. Slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red dye (in situ hybridisation, pink) and haematoxylin (immunohistochemistry, blue); original magnification: × 200.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

TACE in situ hybridisation signals in head and neck tissues and TIMP3 in situ hybridisation signals in stromal cells surrounding HNSCC, dysplastic and normal epithelium. In situ hybridisation signals of paraffin sections were scored semiquantitatively. TACE mRNA expression levels were compared between tumour and normal epithelium or tumour and dysplastic epithelium (A). Dysplastic areas were compared with normal epithelium (B). TIMP3 mRNA expression in stromal areas surrounding tumour epithelium were compared with normal or dysplastic epithelium (C). Stromal areas surrounding dysplastic areas were compared with normal epithelium (D). Statistical significance was calculated using nonparametric sign test. The P-values of <0.05 were defined as statistically significant (*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001).

Although moderate and high EGFR protein levels were detected in most HNSCC cases (data not shown in detail, representative image in Figure 1L), a strong increase of EGFR protein expression from NE to DE and carcinoma tissue was observed (Figure 1J–L).

Relationship between TACE mRNA expression and clinicopathological parameters

To assess whether high levels of TACE mRNA correlate with HNSCC progression, we defined TACElo and TACEhi carcinomas and juxtaposed levels of TACE mRNA with known clinicopathological parameters (Table 1). The nodal status was assessed in 91 patients, 30 of whom had lymph node metastases. We found no statistical association of TACE mRNA levels with age or gender of affected patients. Interestingly, 36.7% of lymph node-positive (LN+) patients displayed high levels of TACE mRNA (TACEhi). In contrast, only 13.1% of lymph node-negative (LN−) patients were scored as TACEhi. The correlation between the amount of TACE mRNA and the presence of metastases in regional lymph nodes was statistically significant (P=0.009). The positive correlation of TACE mRNA levels with primary tumour stage was also statistically significant (P=0.019).

Table 1. Expression of TACE mRNA in HNSCC and TIMP3 mRNA in stromal tissues in relation to clinicopathological parameters.

Clinicopathological feature n TACElo TACEhi P-value n TIMP3STRlo TIMP3STRhi P-value
Quantification ISH ISH
Age
 ⩽60 years 50 38 12 >0.5 50 35 15 0.312
 >60 years 55 44 11   56 44 12  
                 
Sex
 Male 69 53 16 >0.5 71 51 20 0.364
 Female 36 29 7   35 28 7  
                 
Nodal status
 LN− 61 53 8 0.009 61 47 14 >0.5
 LN+ 30 19 11   31 22 9  
                 
Tumour stage
 T1 39 61 12 0.019 39 60 13 0.031
 T2 34       34      
 T3 8 18 11   8 18 11  
 T4 21       21      
                 
Histological grading
 G1 13 64 17 >0.5 13 62 19 >0.5
 G2 68       68      
 G3 24 18 6   24 17 7  
                 
TIMP3 (ISH)
 TIMP3STRlo 77 64 13 0.022        
 TIMP3STRhi 26 16 10          
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: HNSCC=squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; TACE=tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α converting enzyme; LN=lymph node; TIMP3=tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3; ISH=in situ hybridisation. Bold and italic entries indicate statistically significant values.

Expression of TACE protein

To elucidate whether TACE mRNA overexpression in human HNSCC results in corresponding levels of translated TACE protein, we conducted immunoblot analysis using an antibody specifically recognising the carboxyterminal part of human TACE. To verify antibody specificity, we analysed a panel of well-characterised HNSCC cell lines for the expression of TACE protein. We found two clearly discriminable bands migrating with an approximate molecular mass of 110 and 90 kD, respectively. The ratio between cleaved and uncleaved TACE protein varied between different HNSCC cell lines (Figure 3A). Based on the molecular mass, these bands constitute the uncleaved precursor as well as the enzymatically active mature TACE protein. The observed molecular weight of TACE protein was in line with most other reports utilising TACE-specific polyclonal antibodies (Blanchot-Jossic et al, 2005; McGowan et al, 2007). To find out whether TACE protein could also be detected in carcinoma tissue, we analysed tissue lysates from four human HNSCC specimens. Immunoblot showed heterogeneous TACE protein expression exclusively in tumour but not in normal oral tissues (Figure 3B). In HNSCC, the mature TACE isoform constituted the dominant isoform.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Representative western blot showing TACE protein expression in (A) HNSCC cell lines and (B) human HNSCC (T1–4) and adjacent normal tissue (N). Two distinct bands constitute unprocessed and cleaved mature TACE protein. Blotting results obtained with an anti-HSC70 antibody were used as loading control.

Expression of TIMP3 mRNA

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 mRNA was detected throughout all oral tissues analysed (NE, DE and cancerous lesions; Supplementary Table S3). Histologically NEs harboured low levels or intermediate levels of TIMP3 mRNA; the same held true for DEs (Figure 1F) and the majority of cancerous lesions (Figure 1G, Supplementary Table S3). Yet, no statistically significant upregulation of TIMP3 mRNA levels could be found between these epithelial areas. One hallmark of TIMP3 biology is the fact that this cell-secreted soluble molecule can be expressed either by tumour cells at the invasion front or in the surrounding stroma. Thus, TIMP3 mRNA levels were markedly increased in stromal areas surrounding invasive HNSCC compared with DE and NE (Figures 1I and 2C and Supplementary Table S3) and were also elevated in the stroma adjacent to DE compared with NE (Figure 2D and Supplementary Table S3).

Relationship between TIMP3 mRNA expression and clinicopathological features

Expression levels of TIMP3 mRNA in the tumour tissues did not correlate with clinicopathological parameters of the patients analysed. However, considering tumour-associated stromal areas separately resulted in a significant correlation of increased TIMP3 mRNA expression with a higher tumour stage (P=0.031, Table 1). Furthermore, a significant correlation between levels of TIMP3 mRNA in tumour-associated stromal cells and TACE mRNA in tumour cells was detected (P=0.022, Table 1).

Impact of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA overexpression on overall survival of patients

Finally, we aimed to investigate a possible correlation between TACE and TIMP3 mRNA expression levels and the overall survival of patients. Of 95 affected patients with known follow-up data, those individuals whose tumours showed TACEhi mRNA expression levels exhibited reduced overall survival compared with those with TACElo mRNA expression, as judged by Kaplan–Meier analysis. This unfavourable prognosis proved to be statistically significant (P=0.026, log-rank test, Figure 4A). However, we could not show that this influence on survival was independent of lymph node metastasis (data not shown). There was also a correlation of borderline significance between high TIMP3 mRNA levels in tumour-associated stromal areas and a reduced overall survival of HNSCC patients analysed (P=0.058, Figure 4B). Combining the results of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA detection, patients with both high levels of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA had the worst clinical outcome, followed by patients with either high levels of TACE or TIMP3 mRNA levels. The most favourable overall survival was observed in patients with low levels of TACE mRNA in tumour cells and low levels of TIMP3 mRNA in stromal cells (P=0.011, Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Kaplan–Meier survival curve demonstrating percentage of overall survival in patients whose tumours harboured high vs low levels of TACE mRNA in tumour cells (A) and TIMP3 mRNA in stromal cells (B). Overall survival of patients with high TACE and TIMP3 mRNA levels, high TACE or high TIMP3 mRNA levels or low TACE and low TIMP3 mRNA levels in tumour and stromal cells, respectively (C).

Discussion

We determined the amount of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA in human HNSCC using RNA in situ hybridisation as the method of choice, as published reports and own studies quantifying TACE protein levels using immunohistochemistry led to conflicting results, probably because of poorly characterised antibodies (Merchant et al, 2008).

The positive correlation between TACE transcript levels and increasing malignancy of HNSCC argued for TACE mRNA upregulation being an important early event in tumourigenesis itself as well as in the transition from premalignant lesions to HNSCC. Bioinformatic screens for differential TACE mRNA expression using the Oncomine database (www.oncomine.org) confirmed the highly significant (P<10−6) increase in TACE transcript levels in HNSCC specimens (Cromer et al, 2004). Furthermore, in our study, TACE mRNA levels correlated with nodal metastases and primary tumour size and concomitantly corroborated a report describing the association between TACE protein levels, nodal metastasis and local recurrences in a small HNSCC cohort (Takamune et al, 2007). Recently, close correlations between TACE sheddase activity and HNSCC tumour stage were reported (Ge et al, 2009). Intriguingly, in our patient cohort, elevated TACE mRNA levels in HNSCC correlated with reduced patient survival. This may be related directly to the observation that TACE mRNA levels parallel the degree of lymph node metastasis, an independent prognostic marker for tumour progression and patient survival.

We analysed the expression of TACE protein in human HNSCC cell lines and HNSCC tumour samples and detected high levels of both mature and immature TACE protein. In tumour tissue we found a prevalence of the lower molecular weight, enzymatically active TACE isoform. Further studies need to confirm the correlation between TACE mRNA and enzymatically active TACE protein levels. Conflicting migratory patterns of TACE proteins in published immunoblot analyses (Takamune et al, 2007) might be because of different antibodies used.

Thus, TACE represents one key regulator of EGFR ligand availability (Sunnarborg et al, 2002) and bioactivity (Borrell-Pages et al, 2003; Lemjabbar et al, 2003). Epidermal growth factor receptor is widely accepted as a crucial signalling platform on which growth factor signals converge, and the effect of its overexpression in HNSCC tumours has been described extensively (Ford and Grandis, 2003; Gschwind et al, 2003; Fischer et al, 2004; Schafer et al, 2004). Interestingly, moderate and high levels of EGFR protein were detected in the majority of HNSCCs analysed in this study. Thus, elevated TACE levels might contribute to the bioavailability of EGFR ligands in HNSCC, providing cancer cells with high TACE expression levels with a selection advantage. Kenny and Bissell (2007) showed that inhibition of TACE protease activity blocked EGFR signalling, resulting in a reversion of the malignant phenotype of T4-2 breast cancer cells. Inhibition of TACE using selective inhibitors also decreased cell proliferation in an in vitro model of colorectal cancer (Merchant et al, 2008).

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 exerts its anti-proteolytic function either at the invasion front of an infiltrating HNSCC to quench tumour-associated ECM degrading activity or in the stroma itself, where soluble proteases liberate ECM-tethered factors that assist the cancer cell in migration and invasion. Proper balancing between proteolytic enzymes (e.g., MMPs) and their cognate inhibitors (e.g., TIMPs) seems to be of importance for cancer metastasis and invasion (Cruz-Munoz et al, 2006; Wu et al, 2008). Our finding of TIMP3 upregulation in HNSCC with increasing tumour stage is in contrast to a published report that claimed a tumour-suppressor function for TIMP3, showing to be frequently silenced by promoter hypermethylation during HNSCC progression (Worsham et al, 2006). Comparing expression levels of TIMP3 mRNA in TACElo and TACEhi tumours, we observed a positive correlation between levels of TIMP3 in tumour-associated stromal tissues and TACE mRNA in HNSCC. Furthermore, high expression of both tumour-associated TACE and stromal TIMP3 mRNA led to worse clinical outcomes than either factor independently. Hitherto, no reports linked TACE activity to increased TIMP3 mRNA transcription, and thus this effect probably constitutes a compensatory mechanism to counterbalance the pathological increase in TACE sheddase activity. Yet, it cannot be excluded that TIMP3 expression may also function to promote tumour progression (Byrne et al, 1995).

Collectively, this study demonstrates the importance of TACE and TIMP3 expression in HNSCC tumourigenesis and progression. Further investigation is necessary to identify the key proteins shedded by TACE that are pivotal for the development and progression of these tumours.

Acknowledgments

We thank Malgorzata Stoupiec, Sonja Santjer and Oliver Mauermann for excellent technical assistance and Dr Michael Bubenheim (Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany) for supporting statistical analyses. Professor Dr RH Brakenhoff (VUMC Amsterdam) is acknowledged for providing HNSCC cell lines and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe (70–2922 to REF, LR and KP).

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Tables
Click here for additional data file. (78.5KB, doc)

References

  1. Amour A, Slocombe PM, Webster A, Butler M, Knight CG, Smith BJ, Stephens PE, Shelley C, Hutton M, Knauper V, Docherty AJ, Murphy G (1998) TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) is inhibited by TIMP-3. FEBS Lett 435: 39–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ang KK, Berkey BA, Tu X, Zhang HZ, Katz R, Hammond EH, Fu KK, Milas L (2002) Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival and pattern of relapse in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma. Cancer Res 62: 7350–7356 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker AH, Edwards DR, Murphy G (2002) Metalloproteinase inhibitors: biological actions and therapeutic opportunities. J Cell Sci 115: 3719–3727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumgart A, Seidl S, Vlachou P, Michel L, Mitova N, Schatz N, Specht K, Koch I, Schuster T, Grundler R, Kremer M, Fend F, Siveke JT, Peschel C, Duyster J, Dechow T (2010) ADAM17 regulates epidermal growth factor receptor expression through the activation of Notch1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 70: 5368–5378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Black RA, Rauch CT, Kozlosky CJ, Peschon JJ, Slack JL, Wolfson MF, Castner BJ, Stocking KL, Reddy P, Srinivasan S, Nelson N, Boiani N, Schooley KA, Gerhart M, Davis R, Fitzner JN, Johnson RS, Paxton RJ, March CJ, Cerretti DP (1997) A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour-necrosis factor-alpha from cells. Nature 385: 729–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanchot-Jossic F, Jarry A, Masson D, Bach-Ngohou K, Paineau J, Denis MG, Laboisse CL, Mosnier JF (2005) Up-regulated expression of ADAM17 in human colon carcinoma: co-expression with EGFR in neoplastic and endothelial cells. J Pathol 207: 156–163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borrell-Pages M, Rojo F, Albanell J, Baselga J, Arribas J (2003) TACE is required for the activation of the EGFR by TGF-alpha in tumors. EMBO J 22: 1114–1124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Byrne JA, Tomasetto C, Rouyer N, Bellocq JP, Rio MC, Basset P (1995) The tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 gene in breast carcinoma: identification of multiple polyadenylation sites and a stromal pattern of expression. Mol Med 1: 418–427 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey TE, Wolf GT, Baker SR, Krause CJ (1990) Cell surface antigen expression and prognosis. In Head Neck Cancer 2, Fee WE, Goepfert H, Johns ME, Ward PH (eds), pp77–82. BC Deckes: Toronto [Google Scholar]
  10. Cromer A, Carles A, Millon R, Ganguli G, Chalmel F, Lemaire F, Young J, Dembele D, Thibault C, Muller D, Poch O, Abecassis J, Wasylyk B (2004) Identification of genes associated with tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of hypopharyngeal cancer by microarray analysis. Oncogene 23: 2484–2498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruz-Munoz W, Sanchez OH, Di Grappa M, English JL, Hill RP, Khokha R (2006) Enhanced metastatic dissemination to multiple organs by melanoma and lymphoma cells in timp-3−/− mice. Oncogene 25: 6489–6496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Nooij-van Dalen AG, van Dongen GA, Smeets SJ, Nieuwenhuis EJ, Stigter-van Walsum M, Snow GB, Brakenhoff RH (2003) Characterization of the human Ly-6 antigens, the newly annotated member Ly-6K included, as molecular markers for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 103: 768–774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ding X, Yang LY, Huang GW, Wang W, Lu WQ (2004) ADAM17 mRNA expression and pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 10: 2735–2739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duffy MJ, McKiernan E, O′Donovan N, McGowan PM (2009) Role of ADAMs in cancer formation and progression. Clin Cancer Res 15: 1140–1144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Egeblad M, Werb Z (2002) New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2: 161–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer OM, Hart S, Gschwind A, Prenzel N, Ullrich A (2004) Oxidative and osmotic stress signaling in tumor cells is mediated by ADAM proteases and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor. Mol Cell Biol 24: 5172–5183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ford AC, Grandis JR (2003) Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 25: 67–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ge L, Baskic D, Basse P, Vujanovic L, Unlu S, Yoneyama T, Vujanovic A, Han J, Bancovic D, Szczepanski MJ, Hunt JL, Herbermann RB, Gollin SM, Ferris RL, Whiteside TL, Myers EN, Vujanovic NL (2009) Sheddase activity of tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme is increased and prognostically valuable in head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 2913–2922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gschwind A, Hart S, Fischer OM, Ullrich A (2003) TACE cleavage of proamphiregulin regulates GPCR-induced proliferation and motility of cancer cells. EMBO J 22: 2411–2421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hermsen MA, Joenje H, Arwert F, Welters MJ, Braakhuis BJ, Bagnay M, Westerveld A, Slater R (1996) Centromeric breakage as a major cause of cytogenetic abnormalities in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 15: 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Karan D, Lin FC, Bryan M, Ringel J, Moniaux N, Lin MF, Batra SK (2003) Expression of ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteases) and TIMP-3 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3) in human prostatic adenocarcinomas. Int J Oncol 23: 1365–1371 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kenny PA, Bissell MJ (2007) Targeting TACE-dependent EGFR ligand shedding in breast cancer. J Clin Invest 117: 337–345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kheradmand F, Werb Z (2002) Shedding light on sheddases: role in growth and development. Bioessays 24: 8–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kirkegaard T, Naresh A, Sabine VS, Tovey SM, Edwards J, Dunne B, Cooke TG, Jones FE, Bartlett JM (2008) Expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha converting enzyme in endocrine cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 129: 735–743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lemjabbar H, Li D, Gallup M, Sidhu S, Drori E, Basbaum C (2003) Tobacco smoke-induced lung cell proliferation mediated by tumor necrosis factor alpha-converting enzyme and amphiregulin. J Biol Chem 278: 26202–26207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu C, Xu P, Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R (2009) TACE-mediated ectodomain shedding of the type I TGF-beta receptor downregulates TGF-beta signaling. Mol Cell 35: 26–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McGowan PM, McKiernan E, Bolster F, Ryan BM, Hill AD, McDermott EW, Evoy D, O′Higgins N, Crown J, Duffy MJ (2008) ADAM-17 predicts adverse outcome in patients with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 19: 1075–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McGowan PM, Ryan BM, Hill AD, McDermott E, O′Higgins N, Duffy MJ (2007) ADAM-17 expression in breast cancer correlates with variables of tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 13: 2335–2343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Merchant NB, Voskresensky I, Rogers CM, Lafleur B, Dempsey PJ, Graves-Deal R, Revetta F, Foutch AC, Rothenberg ML, Washington MK, Coffey RJ (2008) TACE/ADAM-17: a component of the epidermal growth factor receptor axis and a promising therapeutic target in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14: 1182–1191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH (2004) Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 448–456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peschon JJ, Slack JL, Reddy P, Stocking KL, Sunnarborg SW, Lee DC, Russell WE, Castner BJ, Johnson RS, Fitzner JN, Boyce RW, Nelson N, Kozlosky CJ, Wolfson MF, Rauch CT, Cerretti DP, Paxton RJ, March CJ, Black RA (1998) An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science 282: 1281–1284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Primakoff P, Myles DG (2000) The ADAM gene family: surface proteins with adhesion and protease activity. Trends Genet 16: 83–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosso O, Piazza T, Bongarzone I, Rossello A, Mezzanzanica D, Canevari S, Orengo AM, Puppo A, Ferrini S, Fabbi M (2007) The ALCAM shedding by the metalloprotease ADAM17/TACE is involved in motility of ovarian carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res 5: 1246–1253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schafer B, Gschwind A, Ullrich A (2004) Multiple G-protein-coupled receptor signals converge on the epidermal growth factor receptor to promote migration and invasion. Oncogene 23: 991–999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shah JP (1990) Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg 160: 405–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sunnarborg SW, Hinkle CL, Stevenson M, Russell WE, Raska CS, Peschon JJ, Castner BJ, Gerhart MJ, Paxton RJ, Black RA, Lee DC (2002) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor ligand availability. J Biol Chem 277: 12838–12845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Takamune Y, Ikebe T, Nagano O, Nakayama H, Ota K, Obayashi T, Saya H, Shinohara M (2007) ADAM-17 associated with CD44 cleavage and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch 450: 169–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanaka Y, Miyamoto S, Suzuki SO, Oki E, Yagi H, Sonoda K, Yamazaki A, Mizushima H, Maehara Y, Mekada E, Nakano H (2005) Clinical significance of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 expression in human ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11: 4783–4792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. van Zeeburg HJ, Snijders PJ, Pals G, Hermsen MA, Rooimans MA, Bagby G, Soulier J, Gluckman E, Wennerberg J, Leemans CR, Joenje H, Brakenhoff RH (2005) Generation and molecular characterization of head and neck squamous cell lines of fanconi anemia patients. Cancer Res 65: 1271–1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Walker EJ, Rosenberg GA (2009) TIMP-3 and MMP-3 contribute to delayed inflammation and hippocampal neuronal death following global ischemia. Exp Neurol 216: 122–131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang SE, Xiang B, Zent R, Quaranta V, Pozzi A, Arteaga CL (2009) Transforming growth factor beta induces clustering of HER2 and integrins by activating Src-focal adhesion kinase and receptor association to the cytoskeleton. Cancer Res 69: 475–482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wong DT, Todd R, Tsuji T, Donoff RB (1996) Molecular biology of human oral cancer. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 7: 319–328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Woolgar JA (2006) Histopathological prognosticators in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 42: 229–239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Worsham MJ, Chen KM, Meduri V, Nygren AO, Errami A, Schouten JP, Benninger MS (2006) Epigenetic events of disease progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132: 668–677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu ZS, Wu Q, Yang JH, Wang HQ, Ding XD, Yang F, Xu XC (2008) Prognostic significance of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 serum and tissue expression in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 122: 2050–2056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yarden Y (2001) The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer: signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J Cancer 37(Suppl 4): S3–S8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables
Click here for additional data file. (78.5KB, doc)

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES