Skip to main content
Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2008 Jul-Dec;15(3):113–116. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.51985

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children: Clinical Presentations and Management

Hisham A Aboul Enein MD 1,, Amr F Abo Khair MD 2
PMCID: PMC3040914  PMID: 21369466

Abstract

Background:

Idiopathic intracranial is common in adults, particularly obese young women, but also occurs in children and adolescents.

Aim:

Clinical presentation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the pediatric population and how the presenting signs and symptoms may be different from those seen among adult patients.

Results:

This study is a prospective study conducted in the Alexandria Medical School, Egypt, between the periods starting from January 2003 till December 2007. Ten patients were included in this study, 9 patients were treated with repeated spinal taps while only one patient necessitated insertion of a theco-peritoneal shunt.

Conclusion:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension may occur in children as among adults. If diagnosed early, visual acuity can be saved with proper management.

Keywords: Idiopathic Benign intracranial hypertension, papilledema, Vision loss


Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) also known as pseudo tumor cerebri is a disorder characterized by increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in the presence of normal cerebrospinal fluid chemistry (CSF), normal neuroimaging, and no localizing signs on neurological exam (with the exception of cranial nerve VI palsy). Although this condition is known as ‘benign intracranial hypertension’ it is not truly benign in that there is the potential for permanent visual loss. The papilloedema and visual deficits associated with IIH are an ophthalmologic emergency and require prompt evaluation and treatment.14 The exact pathophysiological mechanism for IIH is still unknown. Suggested mechanisms have included increased CSF production, decreased CSF absorption at the level of the arachnoid granulations, or increased cerebral venous pressure.58 It has also been noted that there is an association between IIH and Chiari I malformation (inferior cerebellar tonsillar herniation), and it has been suggested as a secondary cause of IIH.9,10

Patients more often present with symptoms reflecting generalized increased ICP. Common initial complaints include headache and visual disturbances including diplopia or blurred vision.1114

The aim of the present paper was to study idiopathic intracranial hypertension occurring among pediatric patients in terms of clinical presentation, sex and age distribution, associated ophthalmological abnormalities, and the prognosis following different treatment modalities.

Material and Methods

This is a prospective study starting from January 2003 till December 2007. Ten patients suffering from pseudotumour cerebri were included in our work; the age ranged between 6 till 18 years, admitted to Alexandria main university hospital.

The clinical criteria of the patients involved in our study included:

  • symptoms and signs of increased intracranial pressure

  • normal neurological examinations with the exception of papilledema, visual loss, or unilateral or bilateral sixth nerve palsy cranial

  • absence of a mass lesion or hydrocephalus confirmed with cranial computed tomography

  • And Cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure by lumbar puncture higher than 20 cm H2O with normal fluid chemistry.

Thorough history taking was done with special emphasis on the age, sex, recent weight gain, medications which predispose to intracranial hypertension such as tetracycline, chronic steroids, or synthetic growth hormone, or history of any underlying medical conditions associated with pseudotumour cerebri such as Addison disease or systemic lupus erythematosus. Careful documentation of visual acuity, fundus, visual fields, and ocular motility was done to all patients as a crucial step for diagnosis and then as a prognostic tool. All patients were clinically followed up every two weeks for a period of 6 months.

Computerized axial tomography of the whole brain and posterior fossa with intra venous contrast was done to all of our patients to exclude the presence of any mass lesions. MRI brain was done to all patients to exclude tonsillar herniation. MRV of the brain was done for one patient with fulminate clinical signs and symptoms where venous sinus thrombosis was suspected (Fig 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sagital MRI T1 weighted image of the brain and sella showing features of increased intracranial pressure in a 7-year-old boy, partial empty sella syndrome.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Coronal MRI showing delta sign demonstrating superior sinus thrombosis.

Lumbar spinal tap was done initially for all cases to measure the CSF opening pressure and for CSF sampling (Table 1). The patients were followed up ophthalmologically every 15 days for assessment of the visual acuity together with fundus examination. Repetition of lumbar taps was done only when medical treatment failed to control symptoms or when visual manifestations persisted. The time interval between two successive taps depended upon the response on medical therapy and fundus changes. Maximum number of spinal taps was three times. Theco-peritoneal shunt was inserted for one patient who did respond neither on medical treatment nor on repeated lumbar taps.

Table 1.

Opening Pressure during Lumbar Taps Found amongOur Patients.

Number of Patients Opening Pressure in cmH2O
1 20-30

3 30-40

4 40-50

2 More than 50

It shows that the opening pressure among our patients was commonly between 30-50 cmH2O.

Results

Of the 10 patients included in the present study, six were girls while only four were boys. Seven patients were in between the age of 9 to 12 years “pre-puberty age” (Table 2). The most common presenting symptoms found in this study was headache (all patients) while diplopia and unilateral abducent palsy was only found in six patients, bilateral abducent palsy was found in four patienst. Field abnormalities were detected in two patients where the blind spot was enlarged in one patient and temporal field defects in the other (Table 3). Severe visual loss resulting in chronic disc atrophy that led to post papilledemic optic atrophy was found in one eye of one patient (Fig 3). Nine patients were treated adequately medically. Only one patient who suffered severe visual problems which did not respond to neither to conservative treatment nor to repeated lumbar taps required insertion of a lumboperitoneal shunt (Table 4).

Table 2.

Number of Patients in Each Age Group.

Number of Patients Age in Years
2 6-9

5 9-12

2 12-15

1 15-18

Majority of the cases included in this study were in the prepubertal age.

Table 3.

The CP among Our Patients

Presenting Symptoms & Signs Number of Patients
Headache 10

Papilledema 10

Unilateral Abducent Palsy 6

Bilaternal Abducent Palsy 4

Field Defects 2

It shows that headache & papilledema was cardinal signs among all patients yetstrabismus was found in 4 patients.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fundus photography of 14-year-old female with IIH showing severe papilledema.

Table 4.

Relation between Opening Pressure and Responseto Treatment Modality.

Opening Pressure in cmH2O Fundus Changes Treatment Modality
20-30 Papilledema Single lumbar tap & diuretics

30-40 Severe papilledema Repeated lumbar tap (2times) & corticosteroids plus diuretics

40-50 Enlarged blind spot Repeated lumbar tap (3times) & corticosteroids plus diuretics

More than 50 Pallor of the optic disc & Temporal field defects Thecoperitoneal shunt

It shows the response on different treatment options and its relations to the CP and response to treatment modality

Follow up was done for at least 6 months up to 2 years time. Resolution of papilledema occurred rapidly in 9 patients, with a mean of 4.7 months. Resolution of sixth nerve palsy also occurred rapidly in four patients in a mean of 1.6 months. One patient had established strabismus Graphs (1).

Graph.

Graph

Duration of recovery from papilledema in months.

Discussion

The results of our study conclude that female are commonly affected than males, with age prevalence for those above 10 years. Same results were also found to be true in other studies.15 This might be due to more obesity in adolescence. One study reports that as many as 60% of children who develop the disorder are over 10 years of age.16 Recent study proves that idiopathic intracranial hypertension differs from younger children than in older ones, without sex predilection.2,17 Similarly, Stiebel-Kalish et al25 defined males 13–15 years of age and females 11–15 years of age as pubertal in one combined age- and sex-specific criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension among children with a weak association between pediatric IIH and obesity.15,18

Nine of our patients responded well to repeated lumbar puncture and conservative medical therapy. Most cases of pediatric IIH respond well to adequate medical therapy thus, rendering surgical management reserved only for those who fail medication.16,18 Headaches usually resolve rapidly once reduction in cerebrospinal opening pressure happens, yet some authors report the persistence of headaches even after lumbar tap.19,20,21

Thecoperitoneal shunting is preferred for those children who failed to respond medically or after repeated lumbar taps and considered as the most successful operative procedure.22 This procedure, however, is associated with various complications including shunt obstruction, lumbar radiculopathy, infection, as well as tonsillar herniation.2325 Children, specifically, may be at higher risk for developing complications, possibly secondary to increased mechanical stress (growth).23,24 In one report, shunts lasted only 6†months, with an average time to failure of 9†months.4 In another, they lasted an average of 18 months.25 Additionally, LP shunting has failed to†halt progressive vision loss in some cases.24 Unfortunately, to date there are no reliable risk factors that predict poor shunt tolerance and the long-term outcome of visual function after LP shunting.

Permanent visual loss is reported in 6–20% of pediatric cases, the severity of papilledema, particularly if pallor and cotton-wool spots are present, is positively correlated with the risk of visual loss.2,15,20,26,27

Summary

Ten patients below the age of 18 years old diagnosed with manifestations of idiopathic intracranial hypertension were studied at the Alexandria medical school for both the neurological dysfunction and for ophthalmologic assessment. Nine patients recovered completely on medical therapy and repeated lumbar tap. One patient had a high intracranial pressure resistant to conservative methods and necessitated an insertion of a thecoperitoneal shunt.

Conclusions

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension occurs among children as it occurs among adults. Female predominance is certainly proved, visual manifestations may be dramatic. Visual acuity can be saved only if proper early management is done. Repeated lumbar puncture can be of great help once diagnosis is established. Although the known complications of inserting thecoperitoneal shunt, yet it must be done for those patients with resistant forms of pseudo tumour cerebri.

Footnotes

The author(s) have no conflicts of interest or proprietary interest in any of the topics or products presented in this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Babikian P, Corbett J, Bell W. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children: the Iowa experience. J Child Neurol. 1994;9:144–149. doi: 10.1177/088307389400900208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cinciripini GS, Donahue S, Borchert MS. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in prepubertal pediatric patients: characteristics, treatment, and outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:178. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00386-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Distelmaier F, Sengler U, Messing-Juenger M, et al. Pseudo tumor cerebri as an important differential diagnosis of papilloedema in children. Brain Dev. 2006;28:190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2005.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wall M. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol Clin. 1991;9:73–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alperin N, Lee SH, Mazda M, et al. Evidence for the importance of extra cranial venous flow in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) Acta Neurochir. 2005;95:129–132. doi: 10.1007/3-211-32318-x_28. (Suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Higgins JN, Tipper G, Varley G, et al. Transverse sinus stenosis in benign intracranial hypertension demonstrated on CT venography. Br J Neurosurg. 2005;19:137–140. doi: 10.1080/02688690500145563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Owler BK, Parker G, Halmagyi GM, et al. Cranial venous outflow obstruction and pseudo tumor cerebri syndrome. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2005;30:107–174. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27208-9_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rajpal S, Niemann DB, Turk AS. Transverse venous sinus stent placement as treatment for benign intracranial hypertension in a young male: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:342–346. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.102.3.0342. (Suppl) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Banik R, Lin D, Miller NR. Prevalence of Chiari I malformation and cerebellar ectopia in patients with pseudo tumor cerebri. J Neurol Sci. 2006. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Fagan LH, Ferguson S, Yassari R, Frim DM. The Chiari pseudo tumor cerebri syndrome: symptom recurrence after decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation type I. Pediatric Neurosurg. 2006;42:14–19. doi: 10.1159/000089504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Friedman DI, Jacobson DM. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neuro Ophthalmol. 2004;24:138–145. doi: 10.1097/00041327-200406000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lessell S. Pediatric pseudo tumor cerebri (idiopathic intracranial hypertension) Surv Ophthalmol. 1992;37:155. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(92)90134-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Soler D, Cox T, Bullock P, et al. Diagnosis and mangagement of benign intracranial hypertension. Arch Dis Child. 1998. pp. 78–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Wraige E, Chandler C, Pohl KR. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: is papilloedema inevitable? Arch Dis Child. 2002;87:223. doi: 10.1136/adc.87.3.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gordon K. Pediatric pseudo tumor cerebri: descriptive epidemiology. Can J Neurol Sci. 1997;24:219–221. doi: 10.1017/s031716710002182x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baker RS, Baumann RJ, Buncic JR. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudo tumor cerebri) in pediatricc patients. Pediatric Neurol. 1989;5:5–11. doi: 10.1016/0887-8994(89)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stiebel-Kalish H, Kalish Y, Lusky M, et al. Puberty as a risk factor for less favorable visual outcome in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Scott IU, Siatkowski RM, Eneyni M, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children and adolescents. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124:253–255. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70798-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Friedman DI, Rausch EA. Headache diagnoses in patients with treated idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology. 2002;58:1551–1553. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.10.1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rekate HL, Wallace D. Lumboperitoneal shunts in children. Pediatric Neurosurg. 2003;38:41–46. doi: 10.1159/000067562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Salman MS, Kirkham FJ, MacGregor DL. Idiopathic “benign” intracranial hypertension: case series and review. J Child Neurol. 2001;16:465–470. doi: 10.1177/088307380101600701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chumas PD, Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, et al. Lumboperitoneal shunting: a retrospective study in the pediatric population. Neurosurgery. 1993;32:376–383. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199303000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burgett RA, Purvin VA, Kawasaki A. Lumboperitoneal shunting for pseudo tumor cerebri. Neurology. 1997;49:734–739. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.3.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eggenberger ER, Miller NR, Vitale S. Lumboperitoneal shunt for the treatment of pseudo tumor cerebri. Neurology. 1996;46:1524–1530. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.6.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosenberg ML, Corbett JJ, Smith C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures in pseudo tumor cerebri. Neurology. 1993;43:1071–1072. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kesler A, Fattal-Valevski A. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the pediatric population. J Child Neurol. 2002;17:745–748. doi: 10.1177/08830738020170101401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Youroukos S, Psychou F, Fryssiras S, et al. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children. J Child Neurol. 2000;15:453–457. doi: 10.1177/088307380001500706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES