Abstract
Background
Regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH) represents the end-stage of vascular lesions of the liver induced by chemotherapy. The goal was to evaluate its incidence and impact on the outcome of patients resected for colorectal liver metastases (CLM).
Methods
Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CLM after six cycles or more of first-line chemotherapy, between January 1990 and November 2006, were included. Detailed histopathologic analysis of the nontumoral liver was performed according to a standard format.
Results
From a cohort of 856 resected patients at our institution, 771 (90%) received preoperative chemotherapy. Of these, 146 fulfilled the selection criteria and were included: 24 (16%) received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) alone, 92 (63%) had 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin, 18 (12%) had 5-FU/LV and irinotecan, and 12 (8%) were treated by 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. RNH occurred in 22 of 146 patients (15%). Twenty of these patients (91%) received oxaliplatin, of whom six (30%) had chronomodulated therapy. Patients treated by oxaliplatin more often had RNH compared with oxaliplatin-naïve patients (22 vs. 4%). Although operative mortality was nil, the presence of RNH was associated with increased postoperative hepatic morbidity (50 vs. 29%). Elevated preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (>80 U/L; >1N) and total bilirubin levels (>15 μmol/L; >1N) were independent predictors of RNH.
Conclusions
Patients with CLM who receive preoperative oxaliplatin have an increased risk of RNH and associated postoperative morbidity. Increased serum GGT and bilirubin are useful markers to predict the presence of RNH.
During recent years, the intensity of preoperative systemic chemotherapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has increased significantly. Patients with unresectable metastatic disease frequently receive prolonged chemotherapy treatment in an attempt to convert them to resectability. With this approach, long-term survival can be achieved when liver resection becomes feasible after tumoral downsizing.1 In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is applied for resectable liver metastases to facilitate margin-free resections, and this approach has shown recently to improve progression-free survival after hepatectomy.2,3
Our group and others have reported a relationship between the use of preoperative chemotherapy and histopathologic changes of the nontumoral liver with consequently an increased risk of perioperative morbidity.3–11 This mainly concerns the prolonged use of oxaliplatin and associated vascular lesions. However, close evaluation of direct relations between specific vascular lesions and postoperative outcome remains limited (Table 1).3,6–15 Only three studies have correlated specific chemotherapy-related vascular changes in the nontumoral liver with an increased intraoperative transfusion rate or longer hospital stay.8–10
Table 1.
Review of publications evaluating the effect of preoperative chemotherapy and hepatic chemotoxicity on short-term outcome after resection of colorectal liver metastases
| Author | Year | No. of patientsa | Type of chemotherapy | Related histology nontumoral liver | Short-term perioperative outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studies of no effect | |||||
| Parikh12 | 2003 | 61 | Irinotecan | Steatosis | Unaffected |
| Hewes13 | 2007 | 46 | Miscellaneousb | None | Unaffected |
| Pawlik14 | 2007 | 153 | Oxaliplatin | Sinusoidal dilatation | Unaffected |
| Irinotecan | Steatosis/steatohepatitis | Unaffected | |||
| Scoggins15 | 2009 | 112 | Miscellaneousc | None | Unaffected |
| Studies of effect—outcome related to chemotherapy | |||||
| Karoui6 | 2006 | 45 | Miscellaneousd | Sinusoidal dilatation | Increased morbidity |
| Nordlinger3 | 2008 | 151 | Oxaliplatin | Not analyzed | Increased morbidity |
| Studies of effect—outcome related to liver histology | |||||
| Vauthey7 | 2006 | 248 | Oxaliplatin | Sinusoidal dilatation | Unaffected |
| Irinotecan | Steatohepatitis | Increased 90-day mortality | |||
| Aloia8 | 2006 | 75 | Oxaliplatin | HCN/RNH | Increased transfusion rate |
| Mehta9 | 2007 | 130 | Oxaliplatin | Sinusoidal dilatation | Longer hospital stay and increased transfusion rate |
| Nakano10 | 2008 | 90 | Oxaliplatin | Sinusoidal injury | Longer hospital stay and increased morbiditye |
| Kandutsch11 | 2008 | 50 | Oxaliplatin | Fibrosis | Increased transfusion rate |
| Sinusoidal dilatation | Unaffected | ||||
HCN hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis, RNH regenerative nodular hyperplasia
aTreated with preoperative chemotherapy
b5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin alone or combined with oxaliplatin
c5-Fluorouracil with various combinations of other agents
d5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin alone or combined with oxaliplatin, irinotecan or both
eIn patients who underwent major hepatectomy (≥3 segments)
Regenerative nodular hyperplasia (RNH) is considered the end-stage of vascular lesions induced by chemotherapy, but its effect on the outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases remains unclear. However, with the increasing indications of preoperative chemotherapy, especially oxaliplatin, RNH is observed more frequently, necessitating an evaluation of its consequences. Furthermore, with the high incidence of recurrences observed in patients resected of CLM, repeat hepatectomies are increasingly performed.16–18 Knowledge concerning the consequences of RNH, as well as its potential to regress, is crucial in evaluating the risks of repeat surgery with the continuing administration of chemotherapy.
In this study, we evaluated the incidence of RNH and its impact on postoperative outcome in patients resected of CLM. In addition, we assessed the evolution of RNH by analyzing the pathological specimens of patients submitted to repeat hepatectomy.
Patients and Methods
Patients
From January 1990 to November 2006, 856 consecutive patients underwent partial hepatectomy for colorectal metastases at our institute; 771 (90%) of these patients were treated by preoperative chemotherapy, whereas 85 patients (10%) underwent hepatic resection without preoperative chemotherapy treatment. Of all 771 patients treated by preoperative chemotherapy, this study focused only on patients who received six or more cycles of first-line therapy. In addition, patients treated with preoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy were excluded.
Preoperative Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy was most often administered before surgery for patients with initially unresectable metastases. Technical unresectability was defined as the inability to completely resect all metastases while leaving at least 30% of normal liver parenchyma, resulting from a multinodular tumor distribution, large tumor size, or a close relationship with major vascular or biliary structures. The presence of extrahepatic metastases determined oncological unresectability. The rationale to administer preoperative chemotherapy to patients with upfront resectable metastases was to assess tumor chemoresponsiveness and to facilitate margin-negative resections.
Response to chemotherapy was evaluated in a multidisciplinary meeting with surgeons, oncologists, and radiologists, and surgery was only performed when the overall strategy could result in complete intra- and extrahepatic tumor clearance.
Liver Resection
The goal of liver surgery was to resect completely all detectable lesions. Detailed inspection, palpation, and intraoperative ultrasound of the liver were routinely performed in each patient. Local ablation, portal vein embolization, and two-stage hepatectomy were used as described before to increase the possibility of radical tumor resection.19–21 General and local hepatic complications occurring within 2 months after surgery were recorded and classified.22,23
Histopathologic Examination
Detailed histopathologic assessment of the nontumoral liver was performed by a single hepatobiliary pathologist, blinded for the information regarding preoperative chemotherapy and perioperative outcome. Liver tissue was analyzed according to a standard format previously described.8 Briefly, vascular lesions were categorized as sinusoidal alterations (vasodilatation and congestion), peliosis, hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis (HCN), RNH, and veno-occlusive disease. The presence of macrovacuolar steatosis was graded as mild (<30% of hepatocytes), moderate (30–60%), or severe (>60%). Steatohepatitis included steatosis with signs of local inflammation and apoptotic hepatocytes. Fibrosis was divided into portal fibrosis, porto-portal fibrosis, septal fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Surgical necrosis also was noted.
Repeat Surgery
The development of recurrences was assessed by physical examination, serum CEA and CA 19.9 levels, and abdominal ultrasound at 4-month intervals after hepatectomy. CT imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed every 8 months. Repeat resection of intra- and/or extrahepatic recurrences was only considered if it could be macroscopically complete.17 For patients who underwent repeat liver surgery, histopathologic examination of the nontumoral liver was performed in a similar way as described above to evaluate the evolution of initial lesions.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® software version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Categorical data were reported as the number of patients with percentages and compared by the χ2 test. For continuous data, reported as means ± standard deviation, the independent-samples t test was used to compare groups. Logistic regression was done to define independent predictive factors of hepatic morbidity as well as preoperative predictive factors of RNH. Factors with P ≤ 0.10 at univariate analysis were included. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Of all 771 consecutively resected patients treated by preoperative chemotherapy, 155 received six or more cycles of first-line therapy, delivered by intravenous route. Due to an insufficient amount of nontumoral liver parenchyma available for histopathological analysis, 9 patients were excluded, resulting in a cohort of 146 patients (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Flowchart of patient selection
Patient and Tumor Characteristics
Included patients had a median age of 61 (range, 34–79) years and 76% presented with synchronous liver metastases (Table 2). Most patients (54%) had >3 metastases at diagnosis with a median diameter of 40 (range, 6–160) mm. Metastases were located in both liver lobes in 70% of patients and 20 patients (14%) had concomitant extrahepatic disease.
Table 2.
Characteristics of 146 included patients
| Chemotherapy group (N = 146) | |
|---|---|
| Patients | |
| Mean age ± SD (yr) | 59.1 ± 9.5 |
| Male/female ratio | 85 (58%)/61 (42%) |
| Mean body mass index ± SD (kg/m2) | 24.1 ± 3.6 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 8 (6%) |
| Primary tumor | |
| Colon/rectum | 114 (79%)/31 (21%) |
| T stage | |
| 1/2 | 19 (17%) |
| 3/4 | 92 (83%) |
| N stage | |
| 0 | 43 (38%) |
| 1/2 | 70 (62%) |
| Liver metastases diagnosis | |
| Synchronousa | 111 (76%) |
| Number | |
| ≤3 | 62 (46%) |
| >3 | 73 (54%) |
| Mean maximum size ± SD (mm) | 45.2 ± 28.6 |
| Bilobar | 102 (70%) |
| Mean CEA ± SD (ng/mL) | 293.2 ± 643.1 |
| Concomitant extrahepatic disease | 20 (14%) |
| Extrahepatic resection | 11 (58%) |
| Hepatectomy | |
| Major resection (≥3 segments) | 73 (50%) |
| Resection type | |
| Anatomical | 47 (32%) |
| Nonanatomical | 34 (23%) |
| Both | 65 (45%) |
| Vascular occlusion | |
| No | 21 (15%) |
| Total pedicular | 73 (54%) |
| Vascular exclusion | 20 (15%) |
| Selective | 22 (16%) |
| Combined local ablation | |
| No | 129 (88%) |
| Radiofrequency ablation | 10 (7%) |
| Cryotherapy | 7 (5%) |
| Portal vein embolization | 18 (12%) |
| Two-stage hepatectomy | 10 (7%) |
| Red blood cell transfusions | |
| No | 78 (59%) |
| Yes | 54 (41%) |
| Postoperative outcome | |
| Mortality (≤60 days) | 1 (1%) |
| Morbidity | 63 (43%) |
| General complicationsb | 43 (30%) |
| Hepatic complications | 47 (32%) |
| Biliary leak | 3 (6%) |
| Hemorrhage | 2 (4%) |
| Infected collection | 5 (11%) |
| Noninfected collection | 21 (45%) |
| Liver insufficiency23 | 8 (17%) |
| Combination | 8 (17%) |
| Relaparotomy | 5 (3%) |
| Drainage | 14 (10%) |
| Mean hospital stay ± SD (days) | 12.9 ± 5.9 |
| Nontumoral liver | |
| Macrovacuolar steatosis (≥30%) | 12 (8%) |
| Steatohepatitis | 1 (1%) |
| Fibrosis | 69 (47%) |
| Portal | 57 (83%) |
| Porto-portal | 11 (16%) |
| Septal | 0 (0%) |
| Cirrhosis | 1 (1%) |
| Vascular lesionsc | 82 (56%) |
| Sinusoidal alterationsd | 16 (11%) |
| Peliosis | 45 (31%) |
| HCN | 36 (25%) |
| RNH | 22 (15%) |
| Veno-occlusive disease | 18 (14%) |
| Surgical necrosis | 8 (6%) |
SD standard deviation, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, HCN hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis, RNH regenerative nodular hyperplasia
aSynchronous metastases were diagnosed before or within 3 months after resection of the primary colorectal tumor
bAs general complications were considered: pulmonary, cardiovascular, urinary tract, infectious (other than local hepatic) and iatrogenic complications
cPatients with one or more individual vascular changes
dVasodilatation or congestion
Preoperative Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy was indicated for initially unresectable metastases in the majority of patients (72%). Unresectability was related to multinodular disease (59%), large tumor size (29%), close vascular relationship (10%), and extrahepatic disease (3%). The remaining 28% of patients received preoperative chemotherapy for resectable disease. The median number of administered cycles for the total group was 8 (range, 6–21) and chemotherapy delivery was chronomodulated in 41% of patients.24 Twenty-four patients (16%) received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) alone (9.0 ± 2.0 cycles), 92 patients (63%) had 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin (8.6 ± 2.8 cycles), 18 patients (12%) had 5-FU/LV and irinotecan (8.9 ± 3.0 cycles), and 12 patients (8%) were treated by 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (9.6 ± 3.6 cycles). The number of chemotherapy cycles did not differ between different regimens (P = 0.70).
Hepatectomy Characteristics
Major hepatectomies (≥3 segments) were performed in 50% of patients (Table 2). Red blood cell transfusions were required in 41% of patients, of whom 94% needed more than 1 unit of blood. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 43% of patients and one patient (1%) died within 60 days after surgery. Hepatic complications were classified as grade III or IV complications in 34% of patients. Median duration of hospital stay was 11 (range, 6–42) days.
Nontumoral Liver Parenchyma
Vascular liver lesions constituted the most frequent type of histopathological lesion and were present in 82 patients (56%; Table 2). Peliosis was most often observed (31%). RNH occurred in 22 of 146 patients (15%) and was more frequent than sinusoidal alterations (11%; Fig. 2). Of note, steatohepatitis occurred in only one patient (1%).
Fig. 2.
Example of regenerative nodular hyperplasia. Nodules of hyperplastic hepatocytes replace the normal liver parenchyma and are surrounded by atrophic plates without evidence of fibrosis (note the hemorrhagic changes close to atrophic plates). a Gordon and Sweet stain (×20); b Hematoxylin-eosin stain (×10); c Picrosirius stain (×20); d Picrosirius stain (×10)
RNH Versus Non-RNH Patients
Patients with RNH more often presented with >3 metastases at diagnosis compared with patients without RNH (78 vs. 50%; P = 0.03; Table 3). Twenty RNH patients (91%) preoperatively received 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin (9.2 ± 2.6 cycles). The two remaining patients were treated by 5-FU/LV and irinotecan (12 cycles; N = 1) and 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (6 cycles; N = 1). Chemotherapy was chronomodulated in six patients (27%; all oxaliplatin). RNH occurred in 22% of patients treated by oxaliplatin compared with 4% of oxaliplatin-naïve patients (P = 0.003). The number of chemotherapy cycles was not increased in RNH patients compared with the control group (9.1 ± 2.7 vs. 8.8 ± 2.8; P = 0.55).
Table 3.
Characteristics of patients with and without RNH
| No RNH (N = 124) | RNH (N = 22) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | |||
| Mean age ± SD (yr) | 59.1 ± 9.9 | 59.1 ± 7.6 | 0.99 |
| Male/female ratio | 73 (59%)/51 (41%) | 12 (55%)/10 (46%) | 0.71 |
| Mean body mass index ± SD (kg/m2) | 24.0 ± 3.5 | 24.4 ± 4 | 0.6 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 6 (5%) | 2 (10%) | 0.43 |
| Liver metastases diagnosis | |||
| Synchronousa | 91 (73%) | 20 (91%) | 0.08 |
| Number | |||
| ≤3 | 58 (50%) | 4 (22%) | 0.03 |
| >3 | 59 (50%) | 14 (78%) | |
| Mean maximum size ± SD (mm) | 44.5 ± 28.4 | 49 ± 30.2 | 0.52 |
| Bilobar | 84 (68%) | 18 (82%) | 0.19 |
| Preoperative chemotherapy | |||
| Chronotherapy | 53 (43%) | 6 (27%) | 0.16 |
| Mean number of cycles ± SD | 8.8 ± 2.8 | 9.1 ± 2.7 | 0.55 |
| ≤9 | 75 (63%) | 12 (55%) | 0.45 |
| >9 | 44 (37%) | 10 (46%) | |
| Regimen | |||
| 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin | 72 (58%) | 20 (91%) | 0.003 |
| Other | 52 (42%) | 2 (9%) | |
| Preoperative biochemical variables | |||
| Mean ICG-R15 ± SD (%) | 15 ± 7.3 | 13 ± 5.7 | 0.35 |
| Mean hemoglobin level ± SD (g/dL) | 12.3 ± 1.5 | 11.9 ± 1.5 | 0.27 |
| Mean platelet count ± SD (103/μL) | 217.8 ± 74.7 | 158.7 ± 63.3 | 0.001 |
| ≤150 | 19 (17%) | 10 (48%) | 0.002 |
| >150 | 92 (83%) | 11 (52%) | |
| Mean prothrombin time ± SD (%) | 90.2 ± 12.2 | 91.8 ± 8.9 | 0.59 |
| Mean AST ± SD (U/L) | 48 ± 64.7 | 58.6 ± 36.2 | 0.46 |
| Mean ALT ± SD (U/L) | 46.9 ± 81 | 60.2 ± 49.6 | 0.46 |
| Mean AP ± SD (U/L) | 133.6 ± 124.7 | 208.8 ± 154.5 | 0.03 |
| ≤100 | 52 (52%) | 2 (12%) | 0.002 |
| >100 | 49 (49%) | 15 (88%) | |
| Mean GGT ± SD (U/L) | 96.1 ± 125.2 | 235.2 ± 284.8 | <0.001 |
| ≤80 | 75 (65%) | 4 (20%) | <0.001 |
| >80 | 40 (35%) | 16 (80%) | |
| Mean total bilirubin ± SD (μmol/L) | 11.8 ± 10.1 | 15 ± 8.5 | 0.17 |
| ≤15 | 100 (86%) | 14 (64%) | 0.01 |
| >15 | 16 (14%) | 8 (36%) | |
| Hepatectomy | |||
| Major resection (≥3 segments) | 61 (49%) | 12 (55%) | 0.64 |
| Vascular occlusion | |||
| No | 20 (17%) | 1 (5%) | 0.47 |
| Total pedicular | 60 (52%) | 13 (62%) | |
| Vascular exclusion | 16 (14%) | 4 (19%) | |
| Selective | 19 (17%) | 3 (14%) | |
| Portal vein embolization | 13 (11%) | 5 (23%) | 0.11 |
| Two-stage hepatectomy | 7 (6%) | 3 (14%) | 0.17 |
| Mean red blood cell transfusions ± SD (units) | 1.5 ± 2.4 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 0.9 |
| No | 68 (61%) | 10 (48%) | 0.24 |
| Yes | 43 (39%) | 11 (52%) | |
| Postoperative outcome | |||
| Mortality (≤60 days) | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 0.67 |
| Morbidity | 50 (40%) | 13 (59%) | 0.1 |
| General complicationsb | 35 (28%) | 8 (36%) | 0.44 |
| Hepatic complications | 36 (29%) | 11 (50%) | 0.05 |
| Biliary leak | 0 (0%) | 3 (27%) | 0.04 |
| Hemorrhage | 2 (6%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Infected collection | 4 (11%) | 1 (9%) | |
| Noninfected collection | 18 (50%) | 3 (27%) | |
| Liver insufficiency23 | 6 (17%) | 2 (18%) | |
| Combination | 6 (17%) | 2 (18%) | |
| Relaparotomy | 5 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 0.34 |
| Drainage | 11 (9%) | 3 (14%) | 0.48 |
| Mean hospital stay ± SD (days) | 12.7 ± 5.7 | 13.9 ± 7.3 | 0.36 |
| Nontumoral liver | |||
| Sinusoidal alterationsc | 13 (11%) | 3 (14%) | 0.66 |
| Peliosis | 38 (31%) | 7 (32%) | 0.91 |
| HCN | 30 (24%) | 6 (27%) | 0.77 |
RNH regenerative nodular hyperplasia, SD standard deviation, ICG-R15 indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AP alkaline phosphatase, GGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, HCN hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis
aSynchronous metastases were diagnosed before or within 3 months after resection of the primary colorectal tumor
bAs general complications were considered: pulmonary, cardiovascular, urinary tract, infectious (other than local hepatic) and iatrogenic complications
cVasodilatation or congestion
RNH patients had lower platelet counts at hospital admission (≤150 × 103/μL: 48 vs. 17%; P = 0.002). Mean alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and total bilirubin levels before surgery were higher in RNH patients (Table 3).
Major hepatectomies were performed in a similar percentage of patients with and without RNH (55 vs. 49%, respectively; P = 0.64; Table 3). None of the RNH patients died within 60 days postoperatively. However, hepatic complications occurred in 50% of RNH patients compared with 29% of patients without RNH (P = 0.05). This difference was mainly caused by an increased incidence of biliary leaks (27 vs. 0%).
Uni- and Multivariate Analysis of Hepatic Morbidity
Seven factors, including RNH, were associated with hepatic morbidity at univariate analysis (Table 4). However, only four factors were independent predictors at multivariate analysis: a preoperative platelet count of <150 × 103/μL, major hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy, and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion.
Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of hepatic morbidity
| Variable | N | Hepatic morbidity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (N = 47) | No (N = 99) | UV P | MV P | RR (95% CI) | ||
| Patient factors | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 85 | 25 (53%) | 60 (61%) | 0.4 | – | – |
| Female | 61 | 22 (47%) | 39 (39%) | |||
| Age at hepatectomy (yr) | ||||||
| ≤60 | 78 | 22 (47%) | 56 (57%) | 0.27 | – | – |
| >60 | 68 | 25 (53%) | 43 (43%) | |||
| Liver metastases | ||||||
| Synchronousa | ||||||
| No | 35 | 7 (15%) | 28 (28%) | 0.08 | NS | – |
| Yes | 111 | 40 (85%) | 71 (72%) | |||
| Number | ||||||
| ≤3 | 62 | 17 (43%) | 45 (47%) | 0.6 | – | – |
| >3 | 73 | 23 (58%) | 50 (53%) | |||
| Maximum size (mm) | ||||||
| ≤30 | 50 | 17 (40%) | 33 (38%) | 0.9 | – | – |
| >30 | 79 | 26 (61%) | 53 (62%) | |||
| Localization | ||||||
| Unilobar | 44 | 13 (28%) | 31 (31%) | 0.65 | – | – |
| Bilobar | 102 | 34 (72%) | 68 (69%) | |||
| Initial resectability | ||||||
| No | 105 | 36 (77%) | 69 (70%) | 0.39 | – | – |
| Yes | 41 | 11 (23%) | 30 (30%) | |||
| Concomitant extrahepatic disease | ||||||
| No | 125 | 40 (87%) | 85 (86%) | 0.86 | – | – |
| Yes | 20 | 6 (13%) | 14 (14%) | |||
| Preoperative chemotherapy | ||||||
| No. of cycles | ||||||
| ≤9 | 87 | 26 (57%) | 61 (64%) | 0.38 | – | – |
| >9 | 54 | 20 (44%) | 34 (36%) | |||
| Regimen | ||||||
| 5-FU/LV and oxaliplatin | 92 | 33 (70%) | 59 (60%) | 0.21 | – | – |
| Other | 54 | 14 (30%) | 40 (40%) | |||
| Preoperative biochemical variables | ||||||
| ICG-R15 (%) | ||||||
| ≤10 | 22 | 10 (35%) | 12 (21%) | 0.19 | – | – |
| >10 | 63 | 19 (66%) | 44 (79%) | |||
| Platelet counta (103/μL) | ||||||
| ≤150 | 29 | 13 (33%) | 16 (17%) | 0.05 | 0.01 | 3.5 (1.3–9.2) |
| >150 | 103 | 27 (68%) | 76 (83%) | |||
| Prothrombin time (%) | ||||||
| ≤90 | 50 | 18 (41%) | 32 (36%) | 0.58 | – | – |
| >90 | 83 | 26 (59%) | 57 (64%) | |||
| ASTa (U/L) | ||||||
| ≤30 | 63 | 16 (36%) | 47 (51%) | 0.10 | NS | – |
| >30 | 75 | 29 (64%) | 46 (50%) | |||
| ALT (U/L) | ||||||
| ≤30 | 76 | 23 (51%) | 53 (57%) | 0.52 | – | – |
| >30 | 62 | 22 (49%) | 40 (43%) | |||
| AP (U/L) | ||||||
| ≤100 | 54 | 19 (48%) | 35 (45%) | 0.79 | – | – |
| >100 | 64 | 21 (53%) | 43 (55%) | |||
| GGT (U/L) | ||||||
| ≤80 | 79 | 28 (64%) | 51 (56%) | 0.4 | – | – |
| >80 | 56 | 16 (36%) | 40 (44%) | |||
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | ||||||
| ≤15 | 114 | 35 (78%) | 79 (85%) | 0.3 | – | – |
| >15 | 24 | 10 (22%) | 14 (15%) | |||
| Hepatectomy | ||||||
| Major resectiona (≥3 segments) | ||||||
| No | 73 | 17 (36%) | 56 (57%) | 0.02 | 0.05 | 2.6 (1–6.4) |
| Yes | 73 | 30 (64%) | 43 (43%) | |||
| Pedicular clamping | ||||||
| No | 43 | 10 (23%) | 33 (36%) | 0.12 | – | – |
| Yes | 93 | 34 (77%) | 59 (64%) | |||
| Combined local treatment | ||||||
| No | 129 | 43 (92%) | 86 (87%) | 0.42 | – | – |
| Yes | 17 | 4 (9%) | 13 (13%) | |||
| Portal vein embolization | ||||||
| No | 128 | 40 (85%) | 88 (89%) | 0.52 | – | – |
| Yes | 18 | 7 (15%) | 11 (11%) | |||
| Two-stage hepatectomya | ||||||
| No | 136 | 41 (87%) | 95 (96%) | 0.05 | 0.03 | 5.7 (1.2–27.2) |
| Yes | 10 | 6 (13%) | 4 (4%) | |||
| Intraoperative RBC transfusiona | ||||||
| No | 78 | 19 (43%) | 59 (67%) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 2.6 (1.1–6.1) |
| Yes | 54 | 25 (57%) | 29 (33%) | |||
| Nontumoral liver | ||||||
| Macrovacuolar steatosis (≤30%) | ||||||
| No | 134 | 44 (94%) | 90 (91%) | 0.58 | – | – |
| Yes | 12 | 3 (6%) | 9 (9%) | |||
| Fibrosis | ||||||
| No | 77 | 28 (60%) | 49 (50%) | 0.25 | – | – |
| Yes | 69 | 19 (40%) | 50 (51%) | |||
| Sinusoidal alterations | ||||||
| No | 130 | 43 (92%) | 87 (88%) | 0.51 | – | – |
| Yes | 16 | 4 (9%) | 12 (12%) | |||
| Peliosis | ||||||
| No | 101 | 31 (66%) | 70 (71%) | 0.56 | – | – |
| Yes | 45 | 16 (34%) | 29 (29%) | |||
| HCN | ||||||
| No | 109 | 37 (79%) | 72 (74%) | 0.49 | – | – |
| Yes | 36 | 10 (21%) | 26 (27%) | |||
| RNHa | ||||||
| No | 124 | 36 (77%) | 88 (89%) | 0.05 | NS | – |
| Yes | 22 | 11 (23%) | 11 (11%) | |||
UV univariate, MV multivariate, RR risk ratio, CI confidence interval, NS not significant, 5-FU/LV 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, ICG-R15 indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AP alkaline phosphatase, GGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, RBC red blood cell, HCN hemorrhagic centrilobular necrosis, RNH regenerative nodular hyperplasia
aVariables entered in Cox regression model
Predictive Factors of RNH
Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified elevated preoperative GGT (>80 U/L; >1N) and total bilirubin levels (>15 μmol/L; >1N) as independent factors predictive for the presence of RNH. Risk ratios were 6.6 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2–21.4) for GGT (P = 0.002) and 3.3 (95% CI, 1.1–10.0) for total bilirubin (P = 0.04).
Evolution of RNH Within Time
Fifteen of 82 patients (18%) with vascular changes of the nontumoral liver at first hepatectomy underwent repeat liver surgery. This included 2 of 22 patients (9%) with RNH at first hepatectomy.
RNH was replaced by HCN at second hepatectomy in both patients following interruption of oxaliplatin and subsequent treatment with irinotecan. These patients received 11 and 12 cycles of irinotecan-based chemotherapy between both hepatectomies, respectively. No new cases of RNH were found at repeat hepatectomy in the remaining cases.
Discussion
Although previous reports have correlated preoperative chemotherapy for CLM with increased postoperative complications, evidence for a direct relation between specific nontumoral liver lesions and postoperative morbidity remains preliminary.7–10,25,26 With the increasing use of preoperative chemotherapy, especially oxaliplatin, it is nevertheless important to know the incidence and impact of different vascular lesions on postoperative outcome and to know how these lesions can be predicted to adjust patient monitoring and to identify patients at risk of increased morbidity.
Our present study shows that RNH may occur in 15% of patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. RNH is associated with increased hepatic morbidity and occurs most frequently in patients receiving oxaliplatin. Interestingly, its presence can be predicted preoperatively by elevated levels of GGT and total bilirubin.
The fact that RNH was related with increased postoperative hepatic morbidity was an important finding of our study. However, only a preoperative platelet count of <150 × 103/μL, major hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy, and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion were independent predictors of hepatic morbidity at multivariate analysis in the total study population. Major hepatectomy, two-stage hepatectomy, and intraoperative red blood cell transfusions were equally distributed between RNH and non-RNH patients. However, RNH patients had relatively low platelet counts compared with non-RNH patients. We may assume that a low platelet count was related to splenomegaly due to portal hypertension caused by RNH, with subsequent platelet trapping. These results all strengthen the association of RNH with increased hepatic morbidity observed in our study.
In a recent study, sinusoidal liver injury was related with increased morbidity after major hepatectomy for CLM after preoperative chemotherapy.10 Our inclusion of both minor and major hepatectomies confirms the importance of recognizing RNH in all patients scheduled for hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy treatment. Furthermore, our result was independent of the number of chemotherapy cycles.
Interestingly, we identified preoperative elevated levels of GGT and total bilirubin as predictive factors of RNH. A recent study also found that high levels of GGT predicted the presence of sinusoidal lesions.27 Surprisingly, mean ICG-R15 values, known to be more sensitive and reliable for hepatic injury, were not altered in our patients with RNH. For patients at risk for RNH, efforts should be made to reduce the risks of liver surgery. Techniques, such as portal vein embolization and two-stage hepatectomy, may be helpful to spare the highest amount of liver parenchyma as possible, thereby maximizing the chances of an uneventful postoperative course.
In relation with the increased risk of hepatic morbidity and the enlarging number of patients who undergo repeat hepatectomy with perioperative chemotherapy, it is important to consider the evolution of RNH within time. RNH may have deleterious long-term consequences related to the development of portal hypertension. One case study reported the development of RNH and portal hypertension in three patients treated with oxaliplatin that finally contraindicated curative liver surgery.28 Recently, the development of portal hypertension in patients with RNH with deleterious postoperative complications and even death was reported by another group.29 Other reports on RNH as a result of preoperative chemotherapy are rare.30 When we evaluated the evolution of vascular lesions in patients that underwent repeat hepatectomy, previously diagnosed RNH was replaced by HCN in two patients. Because RNH is distributed throughout the liver in a regular pattern, sample variation is unlikely to cause the absence of RNH at subsequent hepatectomies.31 Furthermore, all nontumoral liver specimens were evaluated by the same hepatobiliary pathologist. The natural history of RNH remains largely unknown.28 However, because it is a noncirrhotic liver disease without fibrosis, RNH can theoretically regress, as was demonstrated in our study.27
Interestingly, in both patients in whom RNH disappeared, oxaliplatin was stopped and irinotecan was administered before the second hepatectomy. This may suggest that irinotecan may be a good alternative of oxaliplatin to treat these patients. Previously, RNH had already been associated with the use of oxaliplatin.4 Recently, different authors have suggested a protective effect of bevacizumab on the development of vascular toxicity.32–34 Therefore, its addition to conventional chemotherapy may reduce the risk of RNH and associated morbidity. However, this issue lies beyond the scope of the present study and needs further evaluation. Conclusions on the evolution of vascular lesions other than RNH into less or more severe types at repeat hepatectomy are difficult because of their irregular distribution throughout the liver with the subsequent risk of sample variation.
Our study represents a selected patient group that received only one line of chemotherapy. By this way, we were able to correlate RNH with different chemotherapy regimens most accurately. However, with the large amount of patients receiving multiple chemotherapy regimens before surgery, RNH may be even more frequent in daily practice. The potential negative effect of portal hypertension related to RNH on patient outcome should not be underestimated.
A final interesting remark of our study is that we observed only one patient with steatohepatitis, who received oxaliplatin before hepatectomy. Previous large series have associated steatohepatitis mainly with irinotecan, one of whom even found that steatohepatitis was related with an increased 90-day mortality rate.7,14 The low incidence of obese patients and patients with diabetes probably is one of the reasons for the low frequency of steatohepatitis in our current study. The precise causes and consequences of this entity should nevertheless be investigated more extensively.
Conclusions
An increasing number of patients with CLM currently receive oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy, including adjuvant treatment after stage III colon cancer, induction therapy to convert extensive metastases to resectability, or perioperative treatment in patients with resectable metastases.1,3,35 RNH may occur in one of five patients, with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity after hepatectomy. Elevated serum GGT and bilirubin are useful markers to detect RNH that does not contraindicate hepatic resection. Clinical recommendations regarding preoperative chemotherapy treatment based on these results should be evaluated further, taking into account the availability and consequences of new biological agents.
Acknowledgments
Conflict of interest
None.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
References
- 1.Adam R, Delvart V, Pascal G, et al. Rescue surgery for unresectable colorectal liver metastases downstaged by chemotherapy: a model to predict long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2004;240:644–657. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000145964.08365.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tanaka K, Adam R, Shimada H, Azoulay D, Lévi F, Bismuth H. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of multiple colorectal metastases to the liver. Br J Surg. 2003;90:963–969. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:1007–1016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60455-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, et al. Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:460–466. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fernandez FG, Ritter J, Goodwin JW, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM. Effect of steatohepatitis associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin pretreatment on resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:845–853. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karoui M, Penna C, Amin-Hashem M, et al. Influence of preoperative chemotherapy on the risk of major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2006;243:1–7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000193603.26265.c3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, Ribero D, et al. Chemotherapy regimen predicts steatohepatitis and an increase in 90-day mortality after surgery for hepatic colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2065–2072. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aloia T, Sebagh M, Plasse M, et al. Liver histology and surgical outcomes after preoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4983–4990. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.8156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mehta NN, Ravikumar R, Coldham CA, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:782–786. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakano H, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, et al. Sinusoidal injury increases morbidity after major hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases receiving preoperative chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:118–124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815774de. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kandutsch S, Klinger M, Hacker S, Wrba F, Gruenberger B, Gruenberger T. Patterns of hepatotoxicity after chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1231–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Parikh AA, Gentner B, Wu TT, Curley SA, Ellis LM, Vauthey JN. Perioperative complications in patients undergoing major liver resection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:1082–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hewes JC, Dighe S, Morris RW, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Davidson BR. Preoperative chemotherapy and the outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases. World J Surg. 2007;31:353–364. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0103-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pawlik TM, Olino K, Gleisner AL, Torbenson M, Schulick R, Choti MA. Preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: impact on hepatic histology and postoperative outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:860–868. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0149-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Scoggins CR, Campbell ML, Landry CS, Slomiany BA, Woodall CE, McMasters KM, Martin RC. Preoperative chemotherapy does not increase morbidity or mortality of hepatic resection for colorectal cancer metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:35–41. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0190-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yan TD, Lian KQ, Chang D, Morris DL. Management of intrahepatic recurrence after curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2006;93:854–859. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adam R, Bismuth H, Castaing D, et al. Repeat hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 1997;225:51–62. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199701000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bozetti F, Doci R, Bignami P, Morabito A, Gennari L. Patterns of failure following surgical resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg. 1987;205:264–270. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198703000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg. 2000;232:777–785. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200012000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Azoulay D, Castaing D, Smail A, et al. Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after percutaneous portal vein embolization. Ann Surg. 2000;231:480–486. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200004000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kornprat P, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Blumgart LH, D’Angelica M. Role of intraoperative thermoablation combined with resection in the treatment of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1087–1092. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.11.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, Ogata S, Sauvanet A, Delefosse D, Durand F. The “50–50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;242:824–829. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000189131.90876.9e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lévi F, Zidani R, Brienza S, et al. A multicenter evaluation of intensified, ambulatory, chronomodulated chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin as initial treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy. Cancer. 1999;85:2532–2540. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990615)85:12<2532::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zorzi D, Laurent A, Pawlik TM, Lauwers GY, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK. Chemotherapy-associated hepatotoxicity and surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2007;94:274–286. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bartlett DL, Berlin J, Lauwers GY, Messersmith WA, Petrelli NJ, Venook AP. Chemotherapy and regional therapy of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1284–1292. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brouquet A, Benoist S, Julie C, Penna C, Beauchet A, Rougier P, Nordlinger B. Risk factors for chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: a multivariate analysis of a group of 146 patients with colorectal metastases. Surgery. 2009;145:362–371. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hubert C, Sempoux C, Horsmans Y, et al. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia: a deleterious consequence of chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases? Liver Int. 2007;27:938–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van den Broek MA, Olde Damink SW, Driessen A, Dejong CH, Bemelmans MH. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia secondary to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Case ReportMed. 2009:457975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Rosen AA, Iseri O, Fishbein G, Knodell RG. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia: a cause of ascites and hepatomegaly after chemotherapy for leukemia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:86–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wanless IR. Micronodular transformation (nodular regenerative hyperplasia) of the liver: a report of 64 cases among 2, 500 autopsies and a new classification of benign hepatocellular nodules. Hepatology. 1990;11:787–797. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840110512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rubbia-Brandt L, Lauwers GY, Wang H, et al. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and nodular regenerative hyperplasia are frequent oxaliplatin-associated liver lesions and partially prevented by bevacizumab in patients with hepatic colorectal metastasis. Histopathology. 2010;56:430–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ribero D, Wang H, Donadon M, et al. Bevacizumab improves pathologic response and protects against hepatic injury in patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2007;110:2761–2767. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kishi Y, Zorzi D, Contreras CM, et al. Extended preoperative chemotherapy does not improve pathologic response and increases postoperative liver insufficiency after hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 (in press). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.André T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, et al. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2343–2351. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]