Abstract
Lipid-laden macrophages or “foam cells” are the primary components of the fatty streak, the earliest atherosclerotic lesion. Although Vav family guanine nucleotide exchange factors impact processes highly relevant to atherogenesis and are involved in pathways common to scavenger receptor CD36 signaling, their role in CD36-dependent macrophage foam cell formation remains unknown. The goal of the present study was to determine the contribution of Vav proteins to CD36-dependent foam cell formation and to identify the mechanisms by which Vavs participate in the process. We found that CD36 contributes to activation of Vav-1, -2, and -3 in aortae from hyperlipidemic mice and that oxidatively modified LDL (oxLDL) induces activation of macrophage Vav in vitro in a CD36 and Src family kinase-dependent manner. CD36-dependent uptake of oxLDL in vitro and foam cell formation in vitro and in vivo was significantly reduced in Vav null macrophages. These studies for the first time link CD36 and Vavs in a signaling pathway required for macrophage foam cell formation.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Lipid, Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL), Macrophage, Signal Transduction, CD36, Foam Cells, OxLDL Uptake, Oxidized LDL
Introduction
Atherosclerosis is a complex inflammatory process driven in part by macrophage uptake of oxidized low density lipoproteins (oxLDL)4 by scavenger receptors, such as CD36 and scavenger receptor A (1), leading to formation of lipid-laden “foam cells,” the primary component of the earliest atherosclerotic lesions. Studies from our group and others demonstrated that CD36 accounts for a large proportion of foam cell formation in vitro and in vivo and that interruption of CD36 expression or downstream signaling blocks oxLDL uptake and limits experimental atherosclerosis in mice (2–9). CD36 is a multifunctional, multiligand transmembrane receptor expressed in a diverse array of cells including monocytes/macrophages, platelets, and adipocytes. Interestingly, CD36 deficiency is found in 0.5–1.0% of African and Asian populations (10, 11), and although atherosclerosis has yet to be studied in these groups, monocyte-derived macrophages collected from CD36-null individuals demonstrated 40% less binding and uptake of oxLDL compared with control individuals (12) with significant impairment of oxLDL-induced activation of NF-κB and expression of proinflammatory genes (13). Numerous studies have revealed that CD36 acts as a signaling receptor, transmitting signals via Src family kinases (SFK) Lyn and Fyn, and MAP kinases JNK and p38, in response to multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands, including microbial pathogens, oxLDL, apoptotic cells, cell-derived microparticles, thrombospondin-related proteins, and amyloid peptides (14–16). The precise molecular details, however, by which ligation of CD36 leads to recruitment and activation of a signaling complex are not fully understood. Identification of intracellular pathways required for oxLDL uptake and foam cell formation is vital for understanding the initiating stages of atherosclerosis and for designing novel targeted inhibitory agents. The studies outlined here demonstrate a critical role for Vav proteins in mediating CD36-dependent oxLDL uptake and foam cell formation in macrophages.
The three structurally and functionally related members of the Vav family (Vavs) are multidomain signal transduction molecules that act as guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rac1 and Rho GTPases and also function as adaptor platforms, interacting directly with signaling proteins including dynamin, phospholipase C-γ; ZAP70, Lyn, and Syk (17, 18). In these capacities Vavs may regulate multiple processes, including NADPH oxidase-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species (19, 20) and fission of endocytic vesicles from the plasma membrane (21, 22). Vav1 is expressed exclusively in hematopoietic cells, whereas Vav2 and Vav3 are widely expressed. Vavs have both unique and overlapping functions and can be activated by several pathways, including ligation of antigen receptors, integrins, growth factor receptors, and chemokine receptors (17, 23–25). In microglial cells Vav1 has been implicated in CD36-mediated responses to fibrillar Aβ amyloid peptides (21). Because Vav signaling impacts processes highly relevant to atherogenesis and involves pathways common to CD36 signaling, we hypothesized that Vavs could mechanistically link oxLDL-mediated CD36 signaling in macrophages to proatherogenic responses. We now show that CD36 plays an important role in vivo and in vitro in activation of Vavs during hyperlipidemic conditions via activation of SFKs. Mechanistically we demonstrate that Vavs regulate CD36-mediated macrophage foam cell formation by controlling internalization of oxLDL in cells.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Antibodies, Cells, and Reagents
Antibodies to Vav1 and Vav2 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-Lyn antibody was from BD Transduction, and anti-phosphotyrosine clone 4G10 and anti-Vav3 antibodies were from Upstate Biotechnology. Antibody to inhibit CD36 was purchased from Cayman Chemicals, and CD68 antibody was from AbD Serotec (Oxford, UK). LDL was isolated from fresh human plasma as described previously and stored under N2 gas until use. All LDL concentrations were expressed in terms of protein content as measured by Lowry assay. Copper-oxidized LDL was prepared by incubating LDL with CuSO4 (5 μm) for 8 h at 37 °C, and LDL oxidized by the leukocyte myeloperoxidase/nitrite system (NO2LDL) was prepared as described previously (2). DiI and LY294002 were from Calbiochem. All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma unless indicated.
CD36−/−, apoE−/−CD36−/−, Vav1−/−Vav3−/−, apoE−/− mice were described previously. Vav1−/− mice were provided by Dr. J. Rivera (National Institutes of Health). Mice were backcrossed at least six times to C57BL/6, and background-matched WT control lines were used in all studies. Thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages were isolated and maintained as described previously (5). THP-1 cells were from American Type Culture Collection. 3T3L1 preadipocytes were differentiated using the adipogenesis kit from Cayman Chemicals. All cell culture reagents were purchased from Invitrogen.
Binding and Uptake of NO2LDL
Mouse peritoneal macrophages (MPMs) plated on coverslips were incubated with DiI-NO2LDL (5 μg/ml) for 30 min at 4 °C. Fluorescence intensity was examined by confocal or epifluorescence microscopy. To assess uptake, cells were then warmed to 37 °C and imaged at timed points up to 30 min. CD36−/− cells were used to assess nonspecific binding.
Foam Cell Assays
Thioglycollate-elicited MPMs from various strains were plated on coverslips in 12-well plates in RPMI 1640 medium supplied with 10% FCS. After 2 h, nonadherent cells were removed, and fresh medium was added for 48 h. Cells were then incubated with 50 μg/ml native or modified LDL for 8 h. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and stained with Oil Red O, and foam cells were counted by microscopy. For inhibition of CD36-mediated foam cell formation in Vav1−/− MPMs, cells were preincubated with anti-CD36 IgG or control IgG (10 μg/ml) for 4 h then continued for an additional 8-h incubation in presence of NO2LDL. For the in vivo assays, elicited MPMs were collected from male donor mice of various genotypes, and 107 cells were then injected intraperitoneally into each recipient apoE−/− mouse maintained on a diet containing 0.15% cholesterol and 42% milk fat (TD88137; Harlan-Teklad) for 6 weeks. After 3 days, recipient mice were lavaged and cells analyzed as above by Oil Red O staining.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis
For IP studies, tissues or cells from mice were lysed in 20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 2.5 mm sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mm β-glycerophosphate, 1 mm Na3VO4, and 1 μg/ml leupeptide. The cleared supernatant containing 300–500 μg of protein was incubated with 2–3 μg of antibody immobilized on agarose beads overnight at 4 °C. Beads were washed extensively in the same buffer and then boiled in SDS-PAGE loading buffer for subsequent immunoblotting. Immunoblots were analyzed with a chemiluminescence detection system.
RESULTS
CD36-dependent Activation of Vav by Hyperlipidemia and Oxidized Phospholipids
To understand the role of Vavs in CD36-dependent foam cell formation, we first examined the activation status of Vav proteins in vivo using apoE−/− and apoE−/−CD36−/− mice maintained on a Western diet for 12 weeks to induce hyperlipidemia (5). Vav proteins were immunoprecipitated from aorta and fat tissue lysates with specific antibodies to the three Vav family members, and the immunoprecipitates were then probed by immunoblotting with an anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-(Tyr(P)) monoclonal IgG because both the catalytic and adaptor activity of Vavs are dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation (17). Fig. 1A shows increased phosphorylation of all three Vavs in aorta and fat in apoE−/− mice compared with apoE−/−CD36−/−. The -fold increases were 3.7, 10.6, and 4.2, respectively, for Vav-1, -2, and 3 in aorta and 5.0, 2.5, and 3.6 in fat. Immunoblots with antibody to CD68, a specific marker for tissue macrophages (Fig. 1A, lower panel) showed equal amount of CD68 antigen in aorta and fat tissues from apoE−/− and apoE−/−CD36−/− mice, suggesting that the differences in Vav phosphorylation were not due to differences in tissue macrophage content in the different genotypes. Mice fed a chow diet showed less Vav phosphorylation than high fat diet-fed animals, and no significant differences were observed between apoE−/− and apoE−/−CD36−/− mice (Fig. 1B).
To examine Vav activation under more defined in vitro conditions, MPMs were treated with copper-oxidized LDL (Cu2+-oxLDL) or NO2LDL, a form of oxLDL that is highly specific for CD36 (2) for timed periods from 2 to 30 min. Fig. 2A shows a representative blot for Vav1 demonstrating significantly increased phosphorylation induced by both forms of oxLDL (p < 0.01) compared with the untreated control cells shown at 0 min. The bar graphs in Fig. 2B show the mean increases in Vav1 (top) and Vav3 (bottom) phosphorylation at each time point after treatment with Cu2+-oxLDL (left panels) or NO2LDL (right panels). Cells treated with native LDL did not show any increase in Vav1 or Vav3 phosphorylation over the 30-min period (data not shown). Human THP-1 monocytic cells were also studied, and a 1.8-fold increase in phosphorylation of Vav1 was seen at 30 min in response to Cu2+-oxLDL compared with native LDL (Fig. 2C; *, p < 0.05). The different Vav1 activation kinetics in THP-1 cells compared with MPMs (30 min versus 2 min) could be due to differences in recruitment and activation of specific SFKs by oxLDL/CD36 engagement in human versus mouse cells or in a transformed monocytic cell line versus differentiated tissue macrophages. No significant activation of Vav2 or Vav3 was detected in the human cells (data not shown). To strengthen the observation that Vavs are activated in a CD36-dependent manner, we also compared Vav1 and Vav3 activation in WT and CD36−/− MPMs. Fig. 2D shows representative blots and corresponding bar graphs for Vav1 and Vav3 phosphorylation, demonstrating significantly increased phosphorylation of both Vavs in WT compared with CD36−/− MPMs. Isotype-matched control IgGs were used to show specificity of the anti-Vav antibodies (Fig. 2F), and all blots were stripped and reprobed with anti-Vav antibodies to control for protein loading. Together, these results show that in atherogenic conditions Vavs are activated both in vivo and in vitro in a CD36-dependent fashion.
During hyperlipidemic conditions aorta and fat tissues are infiltrated by hematopoietic cells with abundant macrophages present. Vav1 is expressed only in hematopoietic cells whereas Vav2 and Vav3 are ubiquitously present in most of the cell types. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the Vav1 activation seen in aorta and fat (Fig. 1A) in advanced atheroma is due in part to the presence of infiltrating hematopoietic cells (most likely macrophages). Hematopoietic cells, adipocytes, smooth muscle cells, and possibly other cell types may contribute to the phosphorylated Vav2 and Vav3 seen in vivo. To address these issues we examined Vav2 and Vav3 activation in adipocytes by NO2LDL. Fig. 2E demonstrates increased phosphorylation of Vav2 (5-fold at 30 min) and Vav3 (3-fold at 5 min) compared with untreated control adipocytes differentiated from 3T3L1 cells.
CD36-mediated Vav Activation Is Regulated by SFKs
We recently showed that oxLDL-CD36 engagement on macrophages led to recruitment of a signaling complex containing Lyn and the upstream MAP kinase kinase MEKK2 that led to activation of JNK (9). To determine whether SFK activation is upstream of Vav activation by oxLDL, MPMs were first treated with a broadly active SFK inhibitor (PP2) prior to exposure to NO2LDL. Immunprecipitation/immunoblot analyses revealed that activation of Vav1 and Vav2 was nearly completely abrogated in the presence of the SFK inhibitor (Fig. 3A), whereas no inhibition was observed in presence of an unrelated kinase inhibitor, LY. To determine the role of Lyn in this system, specific immunoprecipitations of the three Vavs were done from oxLDL-treated MPMs and from aorta and fat tissue lysates from high fat diet-fed mice. Immunoprecipitates were then probed by immunoblotting with anti-Lyn IgG, demonstrating an interaction of Vavs with Lyn in cells (Fig. 3B). To show the specificity of Vav1 interaction with Lyn, we performed immunoprecipitation/immunoblotting using isotype-matched control IgG (Fig. 3B, bottom panel). To validate the Vav-Lyn interaction, we also performed reciprocal immunoprecipitation. Fig. 3C shows that anti-Lyn IgG precipitated all three Vav proteins, confirming the results shown in Fig. 3B. No increased interactions were seen comparing oxLDL-treated cells with PP2-treated or control cells, suggesting that the Vav-Lyn interaction is constitutive; that is, not dependent on ligand engagement or Lyn or Vav activation. Lyn also co-precipitated with all three Vavs from aorta and fat, but substantially more Lyn appeared to be associated with Vavs in apo−/− compared with apoE−/−CD36−/− tissues (2.1-, 6.2-, and 2.7-fold increases, respectively, in Vav1, Vav2, and Vav3 in aorta and 3.0-, 1.2-, and 1.7-fold, respectively, increases in fat) (Fig. 4). These results suggest that Vav activation is regulated by SFKs and CD36 facilitates interaction of Vav proteins with Lyn in hyperlipidemic conditions.
Vavs Are Required for CD36-dependent Macrophage Foam Cell Formation
To examine the in vivo role of Vavs in macrophage foam cell formation, we used an in vivo foam cell assay developed by Li et al. involving macrophage transfer from genetically defined donors into the peritoneal cavities of hyperlipidemic, Western diet-fed apoE−/− recipients (26). After 72 h, cells were lavaged from the peritoneal cavities and foam cells quantified by Oil Red O staining. Fig. 5A shows that ∼73% of WT donor macrophages stained with Oil Red O, indicating foam cell formation, whereas only 16% of those from Vav1−/−Vav3−/− donors took up the stain. To examine foam cell formation under more defined in vitro conditions, MPMs from genetically altered mice were treated with NO2LDL, and foam cell formation was quantified by Oil Red O staining. CD36-dependent in vitro macrophage foam cell formation was partially impaired in Vav1-null MPMs (Fig. 5B), whereas Vav1−/−Vav3−/− cells showed a much more severe impairment. To link Vav proteins to CD36-mediated foam cell formation causally, Vav1−/− cells were incubated with anti-CD36 IgG prior to adding NO2LDL. Fig. 5C shows that ∼60% of Vav1−/− macrophages treated with control IgG stained with Oil Red O, indicating foam cell formation, whereas only 25% of cells treated with anti-CD36 IgG took up the stain. Together, these data suggest that Vavs plays critical role during CD36-mediated macrophage foam cell generation.
Vavs Play a Critical Role in CD36-dependent OxLDL Uptake in Macrophages
To probe the mechanism by which Vavs influence CD36-mediated foam cell formation, we examined binding and internalization of oxLDL in macrophages. MPMs from WT and Vav-null mice were incubated with DiI-NO2LDL at 4 °C followed by 37 °C to assess the role of Vavs in CD36-dependent binding and internalization of oxLDL. No significant differences in binding to Vav1−/− cells compared with WT were observed, but null cells showed significantly less fluorescence accumulation at 30 min compared with WT (Fig. 6, A and B). Because Vav family members have both overlapping and unique functions we also assessed DiI-NO2LDL binding and uptake in Vav1−/−Vav3−/− cells and found that although binding was not affected, internalization was severely impaired (Fig. 6C). After 30 min, WT cells showed NO2LDL accumulation in a small number of large perinuclear vesicles, whereas in the Vav1−/− and Vav1−/−Vav3−/− cells NO2LDL accumulated in small vesicles mostly on or close to the plasma membrane, suggesting a possible defect in vesicle maturation.
DISCUSSION
As part of the innate immune system macrophage CD36 participates in recognition and clearance of exogenous pathogen-derived ligands as well as endogenous modified “self” molecules (14, 15). The latter role, which includes uptake of oxidized lipoproteins, presumably serves a homeostatic function, but in the context of a modern “Western” lifestyle that predisposes to oxidant stress and hyperlipidemia, oxidized phospholipid ligands are abundant, CD36 expression is up-regulated, and CD36 signaling becomes pathological, promoting a proatherogenic response. In this setting CD36-mediated lipid uptake cannot be mitigated by efflux mechanisms, thereby contributing to foam cell formation. Furthermore, activation of CD36-mediated intracellular signaling cascades promotes vascular inflammation and interferes with macrophage migration, leading to their accumulation in the vessel wall (27, 28). Although there has been some controversy about the contribution of CD36 to atherogenesis (29), studies of several murine in vivo model systems, including high fat diet-stressed apoE−/− and LDLR−/− strains crossed into at least two CD36−/− strains, as well as studies of CD36−/− bone marrow chimeras and CD36 inhibitor-treated mice have shown dramatically smaller plaque lesions and/or less complex lesions with less aortic cholesterol in the absence of functional CD36 (5–8, 30, 31). Importantly, recent genome-wide association studies in humans suggest a link between CD36 polymorphisms and myocardial infarction, further supporting this hypothesis (32).
Understanding the molecular details of the intracellular processes activated by oxLDL-CD36 engagement is thus an important goal and could lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets for atherothrombotic disorders. CD36 signaling has been studied in several cellular contexts, including microvascular endothelial cell responses to thrombospondins, microglial cell responses to Aβ amyloid peptides, macrophage and platelet responses to oxidized phospholipids, and neuroepithelial cell responses to fatty acids (14, 15, 33). These studies have revealed a common theme involving recruitment and activation of cell-specific Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases with subsequent activation of specific MAP serine/threonine kinases. Our laboratory showed that the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of CD36 is sufficient for assembling a signaling complex that includes Src family kinases and upstream MAP kinase kinases (9), and others have defined a critical role for two cytoplasmic cysteine residues in mediating CD36 signals (34). We previously reported a central role for Lyn in CD36-mediated macrophage responses to oxLDL and defined a signaling pathway that included activation of the MAP kinase JNK and the tyrosine kinase focal adhesion kinase and inactivation of the phosphatase SHP2 (9, 28). JNK activation was shown to be required for oxLDL internalization and foam cell formation, whereas sustained activation of focal adhesion kinase was shown to contribute to oxLDL inhibition of migration and “fixation” of macrophages at inflammatory sites.
In this paper we now identify an important role for the Vav family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors in mediating CD36 function. We used in vivo and in vitro models of hyperlipidemia and oxidant stress to show CD36-dependent activation of all three Vavs in a manner that requires Src kinases (most likely Lyn). This is consistent with work from Landreth's group showing that engagement of CD36 on microglial cells by Aβ peptide induced Vav1 activation (21). Interestingly, whereas deletion of a single Vav (Vav1) led to modest inhibition of oxLDL uptake and foam cell formation, deletion of two Vavs (Vav1 and 3) led to nearly complete loss of foam cell formation (Fig. 5), suggesting overlapping and redundant functions for these proteins. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that impaired maturation of endocytic vesicles carrying oxLDL presumably played a role in disrupted foam cell formation in cells deficient of Vav proteins (Fig. 6C), suggesting that oxLDL may be distributed to endocytic vesicles following a Vav-dependent pathway. These data are consistent with published studies showing critical role of Vav members as regulator of ligand-receptor endocytosis in various cell types (21, 22). Altogether, these studies identified Vav proteins as a critical regulator of oxLDL-CD36 signaling pathway that is important in atherogenesis and thus represent novel targets for therapeutics.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant HL087018.
- oxLDL
- oxidatively modified LDL
- apoE
- apolipoprotein E
- MPM
- mouse peritoneal macrophage
- SFK
- Src family kinase
- DiI
- 1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanide iodide.
REFERENCES
- 1. Glass C. K., Witztum J. L. (2001) Cell 104, 503–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Podrez E. A., Febbraio M., Sheibani N., Schmitt D., Silverstein R. L., Hajjar D. P., Cohen P. A., Frazier W. A., Hoff H. F., Hazen S. L. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1095–1108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Podrez E. A., Poliakov E., Shen Z., Zhang R., Deng Y., Sun M., Finton P. J., Shan L., Febbraio M., Hajjar D. P., Silverstein R. L., Hoff H. F., Salomon R. G., Hazen S. L. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 38517–38523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhao Z., de Beer M. C., Cai L., Asmis R., de Beer F. C., de Villiers W. J., van der Westhuyzen D. R. (2005) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 25, 168–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Febbraio M., Podrez E. A., Smith J. D., Hajjar D. P., Hazen S. L., Hoff H. F., Sharma K., Silverstein R. L. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1049–1056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Febbraio M., Guy E., Silverstein R. L. (2004) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24, 2333–2338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Guy E., Kuchibhotla S., Silverstein R., Febbraio M. (2007) Atherosclerosis. 192, 123–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kuchibhotla S., Vanegas D., Kennedy D. J., Guy E., Nimako G., Morton R. E., Febbraio M. (2008) Cardiovasc. Res. 78, 185–196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rahaman S. O., Lennon D. J., Febbraio M., Podrez E. A., Hazen S. L., Silverstein R. L. (2006) Cell Metab. 4, 211–221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yamamoto N., Ikeda H., Tandon N. N., Herman J., Tomiyama Y., Mitani T., Sekiguchi S., Lipsky R., Kralisz U., Jamieson G. A. (1990) Blood 76, 1698–1703 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Curtis B. R., Aster R. H. (1996) Transfusion 36, 331–334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Nozaki S., Kashiwagi H., Yamashita S., Nakagawa T., Kostner B., Tomiyama Y., Nakata A., Ishigami M., Miyagawa J., Kameda-Takemura K. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 96, 1859–1865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Janabi M., Yamashita S., Hirano K., Sakai N., Hiraoka H., Matsumoto K., Zhang Z., Nozaki S., Matsuzawa Y. (2000) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20, 1953–1960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Moore K. J., Freeman M. W. (2006) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 26, 1702–1711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Silverstein R. L., Febbraio M. (2009) Sci. Signal. 2, re3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ghosh A., Li W., Febbraio M., Espinola R. G., McCrae K. R., Cockrell E., Silverstein R. L. (2008) J. Clin. Invest. 118, 1934–1943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bustelo X. R. (2001) Oncogene 20, 6372–6381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Swat W., Fujikawa K. (2005) Immunol. Res. 32, 259–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Graham D. B., Robertson C. M., Bautista J., Mascarenhas F., Diacovo M. J., Montgrain V., Lam S. K., Cremasco V., Dunne W. M., Faccio R., Coopersmith C. M., Swat W. (2007) J. Clin. Invest. 117, 3445–3452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Miletic A. V., Graham D. B., Montgrain V., Fujikawa K., Kloeppel T., Brim K., Weaver B., Schreiber R., Xavier R., Swat W. (2007) Blood 109, 3360–3368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wilkinson B., Koenigsknecht-Talboo J., Grommes C., Lee C. Y., Landreth G. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 20842–20850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Malhotra S., Kovats S., Zhang W., Coggeshall K. M. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24088–24097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Turner M., Billadeau D. D. (2002) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 476–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wells C. M., Bhavsar P. J., Evans I. R., Vigorito E., Turner M., Tybulewicz V., Ridley A. J. (2005) Exp. Cell Res. 310, 303–310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Pearce A. C., Senis Y. A., Billadeau D. D., Turner M., Watson S. P., Vigorito E. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 53955–53962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li A. C., Binder C. J., Gutierrez A., Brown K. K., Plotkin C. R., Pattison J. W., Valledor A. F., Davis R. A., Willson T. M., Witztum J. L., Palinski W., Glass C. K. (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 114, 1564–1576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Harb D., Bujold K., Febbraio M., Sirois M. G., Ong H., Marleau S. (2009) Cardiovasc. Res. 83, 42–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Park Y. M., Febbraio M., Silverstein R. L. (2009) J. Clin. Invest. 119, 136–145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Moore K. J., Kunjathoor V. V., Koehn S. L., Manning J. J., Tseng A. A., Silver J. M., McKee M., Freeman M. W. (2005) J. Clin. Invest. 115, 2192–2201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kennedy D. J., Kuchibhotla S. D., Guy E., Park Y. M., Nimako G., Vanegas D., Morton R. E., Febbraio M. (2009) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29, 1481–1487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Marleau S., Harb D., Bujold K., Avallone R., Iken K., Wang Y., Demers A., Sirois M. G., Febbraio M., Silverstein R. L., Tremblay A., Ong H. (2005) FASEB J. 19, 1869–1871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Knowles J. W., Wang H., Itakura H., Southwick A., Myers R. M., Iribarren C., Fortmann S. P., Go A. S., Quertermous T., Hlatky M. A. (2007) Am. Heart J. 154, 1052–1058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Benton R., Vannice K. S., Vosshall L. B. (2007) Nature 450, 289–293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Stuart L. M., Deng J., Silver J. M., Takahashi K., Tseng A. A., Hennessy E. J., Ezekowitz R. A., Moore K. J. (2005) J. Cell Biol. 170, 477–485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]