Abstract
Brain function depends upon complex metabolic interactions amongst only a few different cell types, with astrocytes providing critical support for neurons. Astrocyte functions include buffering the extracellular space, providing substrates to neurons, interchanging glutamate and glutamine for synaptic transmission with neurons, and facilitating access to blood vessels. Whereas neurons possess highly oxidative metabolism and easily succumb to ischemia, astrocytes rely more on glycolytic metabolism and hence are less susceptible to lack of oxygen. Astrocytoma cells appear to retain basic metabolic mechanisms of astrocytes, for example, they show a high glycolytic rate, lactate extrusion, ability to flourish under hypoxia, and opportunistic use of mechanisms to enhance cell division and maintain growth. Differences in metabolism between neurons and astrocytes may also extend to astrocytoma cells, providing therapeutic opportunities against astrocytomas, including sensitivity to acetate, a high rate of glycolysis and lactate extrusion, glutamate uptake transporters, differential sensitivities of monocarboxylate transporters, presence of glycogen, high interlinking with gap junctions, use of NADPH for lipid synthesis, utilizing different isoforms of synthetic enzymes (e.g. isocitrate dehydrogenase, pyruvate carboxylase, pyruvate kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) and different glucose uptake mechanisms. These unique metabolic susceptibilities may augment conventional therapeutic attacks based on cell division differences and surface receptors alone.
Keywords: Astrocyte, Glioma Glycolysis, Hypoxia-inducible factor, Lactate, Metabolism, Mitochondria
INTRODUCTION
In normal brain, astrocytes and neurons form a complex, symbiotic relationship for both maintenance of neuronal function as well as support of brain metabolism (1–5). Most aerobic metabolism within the CNS is performed within neurons due to their high ATP requirements, particularly following neuronal activation, with astrocytes forming a smaller metabolic compartment in comparison. Astrocytes are important in buffering neurons from the bloodstream, forming part of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and hence assisting in providing glucose to the extracellular space as the primary initial metabolite for the brain, in addition to storing glycogen for buffering hypoglycemia (6–10).
Astrocyte metabolism primarily functions using ATP derived from complete glycolysis, with lactate extrusion into the extracellular space as the endpoint (11–15). For example, extracellular glucose in the human brain varies between 0.5 and 1.5 mM, whereas extracellular lactate levels approach at least approximately 2.5 mM compared to ~0.75 mM systemically (16, 17). This high extracellular brain lactate provides a key metabolite for neuronal aerobic metabolism, in addition to direct glucose utilization by neurons. Lactate levels are balanced between astrocyte extrusion and neuronal uptake and metabolism in a complex time course linked to neuronal activation (13, 18).
Astrocytes maintain homeostasis of the extracellular space and are able to sense high levels of neuronal metabolic demand through a variety of intercellular messenger molecules, including glutamate, K+, nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and ammonia, amongst others (Fig. 1) (1, 3, 9, 11). Mitochondrial function and the citric acid cycle (also known as the tricarboxylic acid cycle [TCA]) in astrocytes are very different from that of neurons, with astrocyte metabolism focusing on synthetic or cataplerotic pathways (i.e. intermediates are removed from the citric acid cycle), particularly for synthesis of glutamine for neuronal use (3, 9, 10, 19). A large aspect of astrocyte functioning is focused on glutamate uptake from spillover of glutamate into the extracellular space after neuronal synaptic activation. Rapid glutamate uptake via transporters into astrocytes functions to limit synaptic activity of glutamate, much like acetylcholinesterase, which limits acetylcholine function at neuromuscular junctions. To complete this cycle, astrocytes are critical to maintain glutamine extrusion for subsequent neuronal reformation of glutamate, and much of this glutamine is derived from the TCA cycle in astrocytes via α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) synthesis. Thus, astrocytes are primarily anaerobic in terms of ATP generation via anaerobic glycolysis and net lactate extrusion (though they can also generate ATP from the TCA cycle), whereas neurons primarily function with high levels of aerobic mitochondrial metabolism. This low sensitivity to hypoxia is evident by the well-known capability to culture astrocytes (or astrocytoma cells) for up to 24 hours from adult brain tissue, (even cadaveric), whereas neurons survive less than 3 to 5 minutes in an anoxic environment (20).
Figure 1.

Schematic of the important metabolic interactions between the cellular elements of the brain. A neuron is shown above and the primary roles of astrocytes are illustrated in terms of metabolic processing (center), as an interface to blood vessels and blood brain barrier (right), and as a syncytium with gap junctions interposed between individual astrocytes (left). Metabolites and their concentration in the extracellular space (glucose, brain lactate, and systemic lactate), and transporters (glucose Glut1 on endothelium and astrocytes, glucose Glut3 on neurons, monocarboxylate MCT1 on endothelium and astrocytes, MCT2 on neurons) are shown. Abbreviations: α-KG: α-keto-glutarate; BBB: blood-brain barrier; eNOS/NO: endothelial nitric oxide synthetase and nitric oxide; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; nNOS/NO: neuronal nitric oxide synthetase and nitric oxide; PC: pyruvate carboxylase; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle.
Astrocytoma cells maintain and extend these usual characteristics of normal astrocytes, with a high level of glycolytic functioning and lactate extrusion, and can flourish in a relatively anoxic environment (21). Astrocytoma cells likely share more characteristics with immature astrocytes than mature ones, but these basic metabolic functions remain common to both. These characteristics follow the general trend noted for most cancer cells to develop a high rate of glycolysis and synthetic function to enhance cell replication, termed the Warburg effect (22–24). Astrocytomas are generally devoid of neurons, which is one reason why the extracellular lactate levels rise and extracellular acidity increases within the tumor beds. Astrocytoma cells are, however, clearly adept at survival as they infiltrate the neuropil of normal brain parenchyma. Additionally, fast tumor growth leads to a hypoxic environment, which also favors tumor growth. Many of the invasive features of astrocytomas may depend on unique or distorted metabolism. Indeed, our laboratory has recently uncovered a novel genetic alteration that leads to the loss of the migration-related protein adherens junctional associated protein, which directly interacts with enzymes in glycolytic pathways (unpublished data). The coupling of metabolic alterations and invasive properties is a growing field in astrocytoma studies.
Because many features of immature astrocytes are preserved and even amplified within astrocytomas, these metabolic differences may be exploited for astrocytoma treatments. Unique keys to astrocyte metabolism include, for example, acetate, which neurons selectively can neither uptake nor metabolize. Astrocytes also form syncytia to facilitate buffering of the extracellular space, rapidly passing Ca2+, K+, glucose, water and other molecules from astrocyte to astrocyte via gap junctions for homeostatic purposes. This characteristic can be exaggerated within astrocytomas as well. Thus, the hypothesis of this review is that astrocytoma cells retain the basic metabolic characteristics of immature astrocytes, but many of these are distorted and exaggerated, with less metabolic control possible, but which may provide unique pathways of susceptibility for possible understanding of invasiveness and treatment. This review describes normal metabolic functioning within the neuronal-astrocyte-vascular metabolic unit, followed by a discussion of how these metabolic differences between neurons and astrocytes may expose susceptibilities and provide therapeutic strategies for astrocytomas.
NORMAL NEURONAL-ASTROCYTE-VASCULAR INTERACTIONS – METABOLIC UNIT (FIG. 1)
Normally, neurons, astrocytes and blood vessels function in a complex network and neurons cannot function without this metabolic linkage and astrocyte support. However, astrocytes can be cultured in isolation from neurons (20), although in isolated tissue culture they develop characteristics different from either astrocytes in vivo or in the presence of neurons.
Specific Neuronal Mechanisms
Although a low level of basal metabolism is important for cellular maintenance, neuronal activation leads to increased energy requirements (4). Neuronal metabolism consists of multiple compartments, including submembrane glycolysis linked to membrane ion pumping (i.e. Na/K ATPase, K-ATP channels, etc.), aerobic glycolysis for pyruvate generation for aerobic metabolism, and NADH/ATP generation via TCA cycle within mitochondria (1). In addition to glucose uptake (moderated by both endothelial cells and astrocytes), there is also considerable lactate uptake for aerobic metabolism, in a complex pattern (1, 13, 18). Neurons are highly dependent on aerobic metabolism and oxygen utilization and they may succumb within a few minutes if deprived of substrate (glucose, lactate, oxygen), as in cerebral ischemia (25). As part of neuronal activation there is spillover and release of byproducts that can then secondarily influence the surrounding cells and blood vessels, thereby affecting their metabolism. These mediators of astrocyte and vascular coupling include NO generation, K+ release, glutamate release, H2O2, and lowering of extracellular lactate and oxygen, all contributing to astrocyte activation and a secondary (delayed) vascular response to enhance local blood flow and substrate delivery (3, 8–11, 26–28). This secondary vascular response, for example, also leads to enhanced oxygen, lactate and glucose levels following neuronal activation, typically beyond what is needed for recovery (4, 13, 18). Neurons are adapted to this role, with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoforms, for example, favoring lactate to pyruvate conversion (29), and monocarboxylate transport (MCT2) receptors on neurons augmented for pyruvate and lactate uptake at much higher affinity than those on astrocytes (MCT1 and MCT4) (5, 12, 30–32).
Astrocyte Mechanisms
Astrocytes form the boundary between the vascular network, substrate delivery, and neurons. Astrocytes connect blood vessels to the extracellular space and neurons: both astrocytes and blood vessels have similar glucose (Glut1) and monocarboxylate (MCT1) transporters and astrocytes have end-feet on blood vessels that reinforce the blood brain barrier (i.e. beyond tight junctions between endothelial cells). Astrocytes are thought to be critically involved with glucose transport into the extracellular space, leading to a moderate level of glucose, partly due to limitations imposed by saturable transporters (i.e. 0.5–1.5 mM) (9, 16, 17). Astrocytes also demonstrate an extensive network of gap junctions for extracellular homeostasis (i.e. Ca2+, K+, glutamate and glucose buffering), which is enhanced in tissue culture (9, 33). Because astrocytes buffer the extracellular space there are a variety of metabolic intermediates; once neurons are activated, these intermediates then signal to astrocytes and blood vessels to enhance the support for substrate repletion as well as continued activation without exhaustion. Candidates for metabolic signaling include K+ (released following all action potentials), glutamate (uptake into astrocytes via glutamate transporters as well as direct receptor function on astrocyte glutamate receptors – i.e. metabotropic receptors), ammonia, lactate levels, oxygen levels, and diffusible factors (i.e. NO, H2O2, superoxide).
Astrocytes can also store reserve energy as glycogen, whereas neurons cannot (3, 6, 7). Glycogen has been implicated indirectly in neuron function, e.g. buffering low glucose conditions (6). Note that glycogen reserves can be built up with extra substrate, such as glucose, pyruvate or lactate, which can facilitate intrinsic glucose incorporation into glycogen rather than being consumed as an energy substrate (7). Glycogen release in the brain may be directly coupled primarily to low levels of extracellular glucose rather than hormonal factors. Glycogen is subsequently released either as glucose into the extracellular space or as lactate, after being routed through glycolysis.
Astrocytes are also specialized for glutamate uptake to buffer the high rate of neuronal release and limit post-synaptic neuronal activation because glutamate is highly toxic in the extracellular space (3, 10, 19). Inasmuch as neurons rapidly require glutamine in return for subsequent vesicular synthesis of glutamate, the bulk of the astrocytic TCA cycle is devoted to synthesis of α-ketoglutarate, which is needed for glutamine synthesis rather than for energy production (3). A secondary result is also ammonia recycling between neurons and astrocytes. In addition to glutamine synthesis, astrocytes also have several key enzymes that differ from those in neurons, with respect to lipid synthesis, pyruvate carboxylation (to generate glutamate indirectly from glucose), NADPH utilization, and LDH. For example, neurons can use ketone bodies during both early development and later in life whereas astrocytes are more directly dependent upon glucose (34).
Most ATP within astrocytes is for cell pumping requirements to maintain ionic exchange, likely arising from glycolysis, with rapid extrusion of lactate via MCT4 (12) and replenishment of the extracellular space (13, 18). There is clearly some energy derived from the TCA cycle, since astrocytes are exquisitely sensitive to fluoroacetate, a highly toxic astrocyte poison that is converted only within astrocytes to fluorocitrate within mitochondria. However, many filopodia of astrocytes are too thin to allow for mitochondria, thereby creating spatial subdivisions that likely have different metabolic needs (2, 3).
Vascular coupling between neurons, astrocytes and blood vessels is primarily due to diffusible factors, particularly NO, but which also hinges on a number of other factors, such as extracellular lactate (28). Other diffusible factors include reactive oxygen species (ROS), typically byproducts of neuronal metabolism such as superoxide, which is rapidly converted into H2O2 by superoxide dismutase. Oxygen itself is also a diffusible signal into blood vessels that regulates function and metabolism (26, 35). A secondary consequence of these ROS is that a control system is needed to handle the byproducts, which may also be damaging to cells. This antioxidant system includes glutathione, which requires NADPH from NADP+-linked isocitrate dehydrogenase for functioning, as well as superoxide dismutase and catalase.
Astrocytes In Isolation
The local metabolic unit functions in a cooperative fashion, with neurons requiring considerable energy substrates (glucose, lactate) and glutamate synthesis from substrates (glutamine) derived from astrocytes and blood vessels; these in turn release a number of factors that must be buffered and can function as signals, including glutamate, K+, NO, superoxide, and H2O2 (Fig. 1). In the absence of neurons (e.g. in isolated tissue culture), astrocytes develop even more robust syncytia with enhanced gap junctions compared to those in vivo. Extruded lactate can eventually be re-transported back into astrocytes if the level rises sufficiently to match the low affinity MCT1 and MCT4 receptors present on astrocytes, particularly higher than 5 to 8 mM (30, 31, 32). Because there is less glutamate uptake, much less glutamate-glutamine recycling occurs and internally produced α-KG can be used directly for synthetic cell functions. Thus, astrocytes function differently in isolation because much of the extracellular buffering function is not needed.
Vascular and Extracellular Space Mechanisms
Because astrocytes can span between small blood vessels, they can facilitate substrate delivery to neurons through transporters into extracellular space, gap junctions and likely glycogen reserves (9). Blood vessel diameter can change rapidly in response to both diffusible and extracellular factors (thereby modulating substrate delivery to local metabolic units), primarily through feedback from neurons and astrocytes (28). The BBB effectively divides the brain extracellular space from the systemic circulation, except for transported factors, particularly glucose, but transport can be saturated. For example, it has been shown in adult humans that systemic lactate is nearly completely isolated from brain extracellular lactate (16, 17) due to the limited MCTs present in adults. In infants, in contrast, there is considerable interchange due to a high level of MCT1 to allow ketone bodies to be taken up into the CNS. MCT may also be upregulated in adults when they are on a ketogenic diet (34).
Astrocyte Summary
Astrocytes normally function as part of a metabolic unit in which their function is critical to support and enhance neuronal substrate delivery, assist in communication to blood vessels, and buffer byproducts resulting from neuronal activation (3). By their very nature, astrocytes are much less reliant on oxidative metabolism. Instead, they primarily function via complete glycolysis with lactate extrusion. The cataplerotic TCA cycle is key to glutamate-glutamine synthesis and recycling. There are a number of metabolic differences between neurons and astrocytes that, if fully present in astrocytoma cells, may offer key therapeutic opportunities.
NEURONAL-ASTROCYTE-VASCULAR METABOLIC UNIT VULNERABILITIES (Fig. 2)
Figure 2.

Schematic of the subversion of normal cellular metabolic interactions for the maintenance and growth of glioma cells. Rapid astrocytoma tumor growth and division lead to hypoxia and depletion of extracellular glucose, causing a switch to the more sensitive Glut3 glucose transporter, increases in extracellular lactate, promotion of migration, upregulation of HIF1α to enhance glycolysis, upregulation of VEGF to enhance angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier breakdown. Many ordinary characteristic astrocyte enzymatic and cellular processes are enhanced with this transformation into a tumor phenotype, yet still may provide susceptible points of metabolic treatments. Abbreviations: 2-HG: 2-hydroxyglutarate; α-KG: α-keto-glutarate; BBB: blood-brain barrier; HIF1α: hypoxia-inducing factor; IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1M is a mutated version); PHD: HIF prolyl hydroxylase; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor.
A number of metabolic avenues that take advantage of the unique astrocyte (and astrocytoma) susceptibilities might be useful for treatment of astrocytomas of various stages have now either been described or could be envisioned. Recent reviews have summarized some of these approaches (36, 37). A recent discovery of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) as being involved in earlier low-grade astrocytomas has also enhanced the possibility of the utility of metabolic approaches (38–41). There are a number of possibilities both for specific treatments, and particularly to enhance the sensitivity of astrocytomas to more nonspecific treatments such as radiation therapy (42). These will be briefly summarized.
Acetate
Acetate is uniquely transported into astrocytes and is then converted to citrate within the TCA cycle. The astrocyte poison fluoroacetate maintains the acetate selectivity and provides a mechanism for directly separating astrocytic from neuronal metabolism on a short-term basis (3, 10). However, another acetate analog, dichloroacetate has been suggested in early clinical trials as possibly following this route of selective toxicity for treatment of glioblastomas through unique acetate susceptibility (43).
Glucose Uptake
Glucose uptake into astrocytes is normally via GLUT1 transporter, but neurons typically show GLUT3 transporters; GLUT3 has a higher affinity for glucose than GLUT1 (9, 33, 44). There are now several examples in which astrocytomas have switched to GLUT3 to accommodate a higher affinity for available glucose (44–47). However, because GLUT3 transporters are still critical for glucose uptake in neurons, an antagonist to GLUT3 may be useful, primarily in the vicinity of the tumor, to block local glucose uptake rather than on the entire brain; this would avoid neuronal toxicity from lack of glucose uptake.
Monocarboxylate Transporters
Neurons use MCT2, which has a much higher affinity for pyruvate (by a factor of over 30) and lactate (by a factor of ~10), whereas astrocytes use MCT1, which has a low affinity for lactate; MCT4 appears to be involved in lactate extrusion from astrocytes (Fig. 1) (12, 18, 30–32). This low affinity for lactate uptake into astrocytes leads to extrusion and rarely any uptake at the normal extracellular level of ~2.5 mM. However, if lactate levels rise to ~5 to 8 mM, this reverses the concentration gradient, to foster lactate uptake by MCT1, thereby providing entry into glial cells rather than net extrusion. The normally low level of MCT1 present on the BBB in adults is different than in young infants, in which high levels of MCT1 are present for uptake of ketone bodies during suckling (instead of glucose). Because astrocytomas may not be able to metabolize ketone bodies (i.e. β-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate) whereas neurons can, a ketogenic diet may provide a treatment effect by reducing available glucose levels, possibly starving astrocytoma cells of critical substrate (34, 46). A ketogenic (high-fat, low-carbohydrate) diet leads to hepatic production of ketone bodies and low systemic glucose, and the brain adjusts by upregulating the MCT1 transporters on the BBB (similar to infancy). Additionally, as lactate levels build up within astrocytomas towards 5 to 8 mM due to lack of uptake by neurons, the reversed uptake into astrocytoma cells may lead to alterations in intrinsic LDH within mitochondria, for rapid generation of pyruvate (48).
Glutamate Uptake and Transporters
Astrocytes have highly selective glutamate uptake for elimination of extracellular glutamate following synaptic release and then recycling of glutamine back into neurons (3, 19). This selectivity leads to different uses of TCA cycle for synthesis of α-KG and subsequently glutamine. Inasmuch as there is minimal glutamate recycling within astrocytomas due to the paucity of neurons, these cells may use glutamate as an alternative energy source to glucose, utilizing alternative pathways in different ways (49) possibly due to IDH1 mutations. Alternatively, glutamine could be metabolized directly for energy in addition to protein synthesis (46, 50). Specific antagonists to block such enzymes may prevent glutamate/glutamine from being scavenged for metabolic substrate in astrocytomas.
Lactate Dehydrogenase
The usual cytoplasmic isoforms of LDH differ in function: neuronal LDH is biased towards reverse lactate to pyruvate conversion, whereas astrocytes primarily function with forward LDH of pyruvate to lactate conversion (29). If lactate builds up extracellularly and is reverse transported back into astrocytes, other LDH isoforms such as mitochondrial LDH may function to utilize lactate (48, 51). Targets such as LDH itself may serve to limit glycolysis (52). High extracellular lactate levels may also contribute to an acidic microenvironment within astrocytomas, as well as promote cellular migration through transforming growth factor-mediated regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (53). High lactate levels have been noted in both MRI spectroscopy studies of astrocytomas as well as direct extracellular dialysis studies of these tumors (54–56). Such high lactate levels are clearly predicted by the highly active glycolysis scheme predicted in the Warburg effect (22). Thus, another metabolic target may be the astrocytic version of LDH to block pyruvate conversion into lactate.
Glycogen
Astrocytes exclusively demonstrate mechanisms for internal glycogen storage, upon which a number of physiological processes may depend (6, 7). For example, glycogenolysis antagonists severely affect the brain’s response to low glucose. Glycogen synthase may also be a target for astrocytoma cells by inhibiting gluconeogenesis (57). Antagonists for both glycogenolysis and glycogen storage are readily available but not yet tried to partially block astrocytoma cells.
Gap Junctions
Astrocytes form a syncytium where small molecules (e.g. glucose, K+ and glutamate) can be diffused between multiple cells, moving metabolites away from a focal area to other uninvolved areas and possibly to and from blood vessels for disposition. These gap junctions may be important to both dissipate toxins (i.e. excess K+) and to enhance glucose and lactate delivery to neurons (9, 33). Gap junctions have several specific antagonists and may be very important in disconnection of astrocytoma cells to prevent diffusion of substrate between tumor cells (33).
Pyruvate Carboxylase and Alternative Metabolic Substrates
This enzyme is mostly situated within astrocytes and allows indirect conversion of glucose to glutamate for use in both the TCA cycle, but also particularly for synthesis of glutamate for eventual transition to neurons (3). The selective presence of this enzyme within astrocytes facilitates a much greater flexibility for glucose utilization than is present within neurons. Other enzymes that have been targeted as abnormal in astrocytoma cells include pyruvate kinase (the last step to pyruvate generation in glycolysis), which shows alternative splicing in astrocytomas (58) and other enzymes in glucose (21, 51, 59) and pentose cycle metabolism unique to astrocytomas (60). Inasmuch as other substrates may wane due to decreased substrate supply, even purines and pyrimidines may serve in metabolism for ATP generation in astrocytomas (61). These various enzymes may be antagonized with specific drugs, which are not likely to affect neuron functioning.
Ischemia
Neurons have high levels of oxidative metabolism and are very susceptible to hypoxia and ischemia: they can only tolerate lack of substrate for 3 to 5 minutes before cell death occurs, particularly if there is a metabolic demand superimposed (27). However, upon exposure to a sublethal hypoxic or ischemic episode, neurons and astrocytes can develop resistance through activation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1α), which enhances glycolysis, leads to increased blood vessel formation (via vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] release) and leads to the second ischemic episode being better tolerated (35, 62). However, astrocytes can survive in low oxygen conditions and can adapt to low glucose conditions by increasing affinity for glucose and a number of adaptive schemes, including managing metabolism with alternative substrates. Astrocytomas (and cancer cells in general) tolerate hypoxia very well, likely through HIF1α induction, which stimulates a wide range of events, including a higher efficiency of glucose uptake and glycolysis and enhanced VEGF for induction of angiogenesis. Though HIF1α is normally induced in neurons and astrocytes (63), it is currently actively targeted for its role in astrocytomas through a variety of inhibitors (45, 64–66). Selectivity for astrocytomas may arise through induction of enhanced oxygenation in the normal brain so as not to cause side effects throughout the brain.
Isocitrate Dehydrogenases (IDH)
Some isoforms of these enzymes (IDH 1–3) catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to α-KG in the TCA cycle (67). Within mitochondria the relevant IDH isoforms utilize NAD+ as a cofactor, which is converted into NADH and can then be oxidized in the electron transport chain to maintain ATP levels (18, 25, 27). IDH1 localizes to the cytoplasm, whereas IDH2 and IDH3 are found in mitochondria. IDH1 and 2 share 70% sequence homology. Cellular glucose sensing and TCA cycle function are clearly regulated by these enzymes. Pyruvate enters the TCA cycle and is converted to isocitrate, which exits the mitochondria via a citrate/isocitrate carrier. IDH1 and 2 reversibly convert isocitrate to α-KG and generate NADPH (Fig. 2). These products promote insulin secretion systemically, but likely regulate glucose metabolism via other mechanisms in astrocytes. Conversion of α-KG also affects astrocyte glutamate and glutamine metabolism. The NADPH produced by these enzymes is an important reducing agent, essential for the reduction of glutathione for anti-oxidative protective mechanisms. IDH1 is more important for α-KG formation and appears to be more localized to astrocytes than neurons (68). IDH1 or 2 deficiencies lead to increased lipid peroxidation, oxidative DNA damage, peroxide generation, and decreased cell survival (69). Mutations in IDH1, particularly at arginine codon 132, are found in 50% to 94% of World Health Organization grade 2 and 3 astrocytomas and secondary glioblastomas that arise from lower-grade astrocytomas (67). IDH1 mutations are thought to occur before TP53 mutations, one of the more common genetic alterations in these tumors, which have led to the theory that IDH1 mutations arise in the transition from a normal astrocyte to a tumor.
The functional consequences of IDH1 mutations may create vulnerabilities that can be exploited for astrocytoma therapies. Loss of normal enzymatic activity is clearly established via dominant inhibition of any wild-type enzymes during dimerization. More interesting is the possibility of a neomorphic or abnormal gain of function effect. Unbiased metabolite profiling has revealed that expression of IDH1 arginine132 mutations leads to production of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), a potential oncometabolite (49). One potential effect of 2-HG is the regulation of HIF1α that promotes tumorigenesis (Fig. 2). HIF1α is hydroxylated by HIF prolyl hydroxylase (PHD), which targets HIF1α for ubiquitylation and proteosome degradation. PHD requires oxygen and α-KG. By converting α-KG to 2-HG, mutant IDH1 lowers the availability of α-KG, which then decreases PHD activity (along with a hypoxic environment) and leads to HIF1α enhancement and/or stabilization. HIF1α functions as a transcription factor that will activate transcription of genes that promote metabolism, invasion, angiogenesis, and ultimately more survival in astrocytoma cells. Additionally, IDH1 mutations could lead to a selective advantage for tumor cells through glucose sensing. Less IDH enzyme activity leads to lower cytosolic NADPH levels, which would signal a low nutrient status in glucose sensing pathways. Tumor cells would compensate by increasing nutrient consumption or perhaps by blocking differentiation. Lastly, IDH1 mutations would increase mutagenesis that favors tumorigenesis. Unchecked oxidative stress would lead to mutations from ROS exposed to the genome.
Astrocyte Cell of Origin
Clearly, astrocytes have the capability to divide, but the actual origin of these cells has remained unclear. When neurospheres are isolated from subventricular zones (SVZ) and plated on substrate without additional growth factors, their natural fate is to become astrocytes (70). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and other growth factors were required to induce neuronal differentiation (70). Neurosphere formation requires 2 key elements: 1) removal from the in vivo environment, which presumably exerts too much contact inhibition of growth and proliferation and oxygen into a flask with no substrate (i.e. uncoated plastic); and 2) addition of growth factors, particularly epidermal growth factor (EGF) and/or fibroblast growth factor. Even many years later, the natural fate of these cells in vivo remains to be fully delineated. It has recently been noted that astrocytoma neurospheres can also be cultured from samples of tumors, but they have more extensive chromosome derangements and other astrocytoma abnormalities (71). The ability to culture astrocytoma neurospheres from tumors suggests that the primary differentiation of astrocytes from the SVZ via asymmetric division has itself become deranged (71). Because these SVZ cells are presumably life-long, there may be a consideration that as the organism ages there may be subsequent chromosomal abnormalities within a subpopulation of the SVZ cells themselves. A recent study of aged neural progenitor cells (which can also form neurospheres) suggests that aged cells are more likely than fresh cells to develop into astrocytomas, particularly after 12 to 18 months, (73). This finding may highlight the common experience that as individuals age they are much more susceptible to developing malignant astrocytomas, particularly glioblastomas (37). Intrinsic SVZ cells also demonstrate sensitivity to EGF, which they require for growth. In many instances, EGF receptors are either overexpressed or mutated into constitutively active receptors in astrocytomas, demonstrating a link to inherent stem cells (36). There have been a large number of clinical trials of astrocytoma treatments focusing on EGF receptors (36, 37). These observations support the idea that similarities may exist between astrocytoma cell and normal immature astrocyte metabolism, since they may have common cells of origin.
Other Approaches
Other metabolic approaches include susceptibility to ROS and redox systems for cell maintenance such as thioredoxin (74), manipulation of the mitochondrial membrane potential via a selective action on astrocytoma cells to alter the metabolism (75), and possible intervention to the action of diffusible signals such as NO, which may be abnormal in astrocytomas (76). There is some concern that CD133, which is generally considered to be a marker of stem cells in neurospheres (along with nestin), may have a component that is related primarily to metabolic stress (77). CD133 clearly is not an ideal target for astrocytoma stem cells because CD133-negative cells that can give rise to astrocytomas have been discovered. Additionally, neurons may favor switching of glycolysis into metabolic pathways such as pentose phosphate, which leads to enhanced glutathione and protection from ROS, rather than utilize glucose metabolism for energy (78). Alternative energy substrates to glucose and the induction of low glucose conditions, such as during a ketogenic diet, may thus considerably enhance toxicity to astrocytoma cells while minimally affecting neurons if alternative substrates for oxidative metabolism can be supplied rather than glucose.
Astrocytoma Summary
There are clearly many mechanisms associated with astrocytoma formation, including several different chromosome abnormalities, mutations in metabolic enzymes (38), increasing rates of mitosis, angiogenesis, and alterations of growth factor receptors, which all have treatments directed specifically towards these mechanisms. However, further treatments might include delineation of abnormal enzymes or those in which mutant enzymes may alter function, therapy directed specifically at astrocytoma stem cells, other aspects of metabolism pertinent to astrocytes (and particularly astrocytomas), and the local astrocytoma cell environment (e.g. the susceptibility to invade surrounding tissue). Astrocytoma cells do appear to behave like native immature astrocytes in many respects, demonstrating primarily glycolytic and synthetic metabolic pathways, lactate efflux, enhanced glucose uptake, low oxygen conditions, HIF1α upregulation, and likely high gap junction presence. These features are also in the absence of neurons, since neurons disappear rapidly within the confines of an astrocytoma. Thus, advances in genetics and metabolic dysfunction may be reaching towards critical thresholds in treatment of this difficult disease (37, 79, 80).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH Grant R01 NS051856 (DAT), NIH R01 AG037599 (DAT), and VA Merit Review Awards (to DAT and DCA).
References
- 1.Aubert A, Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ, et al. A coherent neurobiological framework for functional neuroimaging provided by a model integrating compartmentalized energy metabolism. PNAS. 2007;104:4188–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605864104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Escartin C, Valette J, Lebon V, et al. Neuron-astrocyte interactions in the regulation of brain energy metabolism: NMR spectroscopy. J Neurochem. 2006;99:393–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hertz L, Peng L, Dienel GA. Energy metabolism in astrocytes: high rate of oxidative metabolism and spatiotemporal dependence on glycolysis/glycogenolysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:219–49. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sokoloff L. Energetics of functional activation in neural tissues. Neurochem Res. 1999;24:321–9. doi: 10.1023/a:1022534709672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Verkhatsky A, Toescu EC. Neuronal-glial networks as substrate for CNS integration. J Cell Mol Med. 2006;10:826–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00527.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brown AM, Sickmann HM, Fosgerau K, et al. Astrocyte glycogen metabolism is required for neural activity during aglycemia or intense stimulation in mouse white matter. J Neurosci Research. 2005;79:74–80. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gruetter R. Glycogen: the forgotten cerebral energy store. J Neurosci Res. 2003;74:179–83. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mangia S, Giove F, Tkac I, et al. Metabolic and hemodynamic events after changes in neuronal activity: current hypotheses, theoretical predictions and in vivo NMR experimental findings. J Cereb Blood Flow & Metab. 2009;29:441–63. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rouach N, Koulakoff A, Abudara V, et al. Astroglial metabolic networks sustain hippocampal synaptic transmission. Science. 2008;322:1551–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1164022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tsacopoulos M, Magistretti P. Metabolic coupling between glia and neurons. J Neurosci. 1996;16:877–85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00877.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dienel GA, Hertz L. Glucose and lactate metabolism during brain activation. J Neurosci Res. 2001;66:824–38. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dimmer KS, Friedrich B, Lang F, et al. The low-affinity monocarboxylate transporter MCT4 is adapted to the export of lactate in highly glycolytic cells. Biochem J. 2000;350:219–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hu Y, Wilson GS. A temporary local energy pool coupled to neuronal activity: fluctuations of extracellular lactate levels in rat brain monitored with rapid-response enzyme-based sensor. J Neurochem. 1997;69:1484–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69041484.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Korf J. Is brain lactate metabolized immediately after neuronal activity through the oxidative pathway? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26:1584–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schurr A. Lactate: the ultimate cerebral oxidative energy substrate? J Cereb Blood Flow & Metab. 2006;26:142–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abi-Saab WM, Maggs DG, Jones TJ, et al. Striking differences in glucose and lactate levels between brain extracellular fluid and plasma in conscious human subjects: effects of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:271–9. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200203000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Magnoni S, Ghisoni L, Locatelli M, et al. Lack of improvement in cerebral metabolism after hyperoxia in severe head injury: a microdialysis study. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:952–8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Galeffi F, Beaver CJ, Foster KA, et al. Lactate uptake contributes to the NAD(P)H biphasic response and tissue oxygen transient during synaptic stimulation in area CA1 of rat hippocampal slices. J Neurochem. 2007;103:2449–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04939.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oz G, Berkich DA, Henry PG, et al. Neuroglial metabolism in the awake rat brain: CO2 fixation increases with brain activity. J Neuroscience. 2004;24:11273–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3564-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gibbons HM, Dragunow M. Adult human brain cell culture for neuroscience research. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:844–50. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Oudard S, Boiter E, Miccolli L, et al. Gliomas are driven by glycolysis: putative roles of hexokinase, oxidative phosphorylation, and mitochondrial ultrastructure. Anticancer Research. 1997;17:1903–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–14. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Racker E, Spector M. Warburg effect revisited: merger of biochemistry and molecular biology. Science. 1981;213:303–7. doi: 10.1126/science.6264596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Foster KA, Galeffi F, Gerich FJ, et al. Optical and pharmacological tools to investigate the role of mitochondria during oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 2006;79:136–71. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Acker H. The oxygen sensing signal cascade under the influence of reactive oxygen species. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2005;360:2201–10. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Foster KA, Beaver CJ, Turner DA. Correlation between tissue pO2 and NADH imaging during synaptic stimulation and hypoxia in rat hippocampal slices. Neuroscience. 2005;132:645–57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gordon GR, Choi HB, Rungta RL, et al. Brain metabolism dictates the polarity of astrocyte control over arterioles. Nature. 2008;456:745–9. doi: 10.1038/nature07525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O’Brien J, Kla K, Hopkins I, et al. Kinetic parameters and lactate dehydrogenase isozyme activities support possible lactate utilization by neurons. Neurochemical Res. 2007;32:597–607. doi: 10.1007/s11064-006-9132-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Halestrap AP, Price NT. The proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter family: structure, function, regulation. Biochem J. 1999;343:281–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hertz L, Dienel GA. Lactate transport and transporters: General principles and functional roles in brain cells. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79:11–18. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pierre K, Pellerin L. Monocarboxylate transporters in the central nervous system: distribution, regulation and function. J Neurochem. 2005;94:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03168.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tabernero A, Medina JM, Giaume C. Glucose metabolism and proliferation in glia: role of astrocytic gap junctions. J Neurochem. 2006;99:1049–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Seyfried TN, Sanderson TM, El-Abbadi MM, et al. Role of glucose and ketone bodies in the metabolic control of experimental brain cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1375–82. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Acker T, Acker H. Cellular oxygen sensing need in CNS function: physiological and pathological implications. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3171–88. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gadji M, Crous AM, Fortin D, et al. EGF receptor inhibitors in the treatment of glioblastoma multiform: old clinical allies and newly emerging therapeutic concepts. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;625:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kanu OO, Mehta A, Di C, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme: a review of therapeutic targets. Exp Opinn Therapeutic Targets. 2009;13:701–18. doi: 10.1517/14728220902942348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yan H, Bigner DD, Velculescu V, et al. Mutant metabolic enzymes are at the origin of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9157–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao S, Lin Y, Xu W, et al. Glioma-derived mutations in IDH1 dominantly inhibit IDH1 catalytic activity and induce HIF-1alpha. Science. 2009;324:261–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1170944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:765–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Colen CB, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Marples B, et al. Metabolic remodeling of malignant gliomas for enhanced sensitization during radiotherapy: an in vitro study. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:1313–23. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249218.65332.BF. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Michelakis ED, Sutendra G, Dromparis P, et al. Metabolic modulation of glioblastoma with dichloroacetate. Sci Transl Med. 2010;12(2):31–4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boado RJ, Black KL, Pardridge WM. Gene expression of GLUT3 and GLUT1 glucose transporters in human brain tumors. Molecular Brain Research. 1994;27:51–7. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)90183-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu Y, Li YM, Tian RF, et al. The expression and significance of HIF-1alpha and GLUT-3 in glioma. Brain Res. 2009;1304:149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Portais JC, Voisin P, Merle M, et al. Glucose and glutamine metabolism in C6 glioma cells. Biochimie. 1996;78:155–64. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(96)89500-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Seyfried TN, Mukherjee P. Targeting energy metabolism in brain cancer: review and hypothesis. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2005;2:30. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-2-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lemire J, Mailloux RJ, Appanna VD. Mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase is involved in oxidative energy metabolism in human astrocytoma cells. PLOS One. 2008;3:e 1550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dang L, White W, Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462:739–44. doi: 10.1038/nature08617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.DeBeradinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. PNAS. 2007;104:19345–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709747104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marzatico F, Curti D, Dagani F, et al. Enzymes related to energy metabolism in human gliomas. J Neurosurg Sciences. 1986;30:129–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Subhash MN, Rao BSS, Shankar SK. Changes in lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme pattern in patients with tumors of the central nervous system. Neurochem Int. 1993;22:121–4. doi: 10.1016/0197-0186(93)90004-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baumann F, Leukel P, Doerfelt A, et al. Lactate promotes glioma migration by TGF-beta-2 dependent regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2. Neuro-Oncology. 2009;11:368–80. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lupo JM, Cha S, Chang SM, et al. Analysis of metabolic indices in regions of abnormal perfusion in patients with high-grade gliomas. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1455–61. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marcus HJ, Carpenter KL, Prices SJ, et al. In vivo assessment of high-grade gliomas biochemistry using microdialysis: a study of energy-related molecules, growth factors and cytokines. J Neuro-Oncology. 2009;97:11–23. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9990-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mathupala SP, Colen CV, Parajuli P, et al. Lactate and malignant tumors: a therapeutic target at the end stage of glycolysis. J Bioenerg Biomemb. 2007;39:73–7. doi: 10.1007/s10863-006-9062-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Beckner ME, Gobbel GT, Abounader R, et al. Glycolytic glioma cells with active glycogen synthase are sensitive to PTEN and inhibitors of P13K and gluconeogenesis. Lab Invest. 2005;85:1457–70. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Clower CV, Chatterjee D, Wang Z, et al. The alternative splicing repressors hnRNP A1/A2 and PTB influence pyruvate kinase isoform expression and cell metabolism. PNAS. 2010;107:1894–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914845107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Griguer CE, Oliva CR, Gillespie GY. Glucose metabolism heterogeneity in human and mouse malignant glioma cell lines. J Neuro-Oncology. 2005;74:123–33. doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-6404-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Spence AM, Graham MM, Muzi M, et al. Feasibility of imaging pentose cycle glucose metabolism in gliomas with PET. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:617–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Balestri F, Giannechhini M, Sgarrella F, et al. Purine and pyrimidine nucleosides preserve human astrocytoma cell adenylate energy charge under ischemic conditions. Neurochem Int. 2007;50:517–23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: oxygen homeostasis and disease pathophysiology. Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:345–50. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(01)02090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Agani FH, Pichiule P, Chavez JC, et al. The role of mitochondria in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 expression during hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:35863–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005643200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Garcia JA. HIFing the brakes: therapeutic opportunities for treatment of human malignancies. Sci STKE. 2006;pe25:1–3. doi: 10.1126/stke.3372006pe25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jensen RL. Brain tumor hypoxia: tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, imaging, pseudoprogression and as a therapeutic target. J Neuro-Oncol. 2009;92:317–35. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9827-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li Z, Bao S, Wu Q, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:501–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Reitman ZJ, Yan H. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in cancer: alterations at a crossroads of cellular metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:932–41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Minich T, Yokota S, Dringen R. Cytosolic and mitochondrial isoforms of NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenases are expressed in cultured rat neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglial cells. J Neurochem. 2003;86:605–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lee SM, Koh HJ, Park DC, et al. Cytosolic NADP(+)-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase status modulates oxidative damage to cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32:1185–96. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)00815-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shetty AK, Turner DA. In vitro survival and differentiation of neurons derived from epidermal growth factor-responsive postnatal hippocampal stem cells: inducing effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurobiol. 1998;35:395–425. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(19980615)35:4<395::aid-neu7>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Heddleston JM, Li Z, McLendon RE, et al. The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3274–84. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.20.9701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Alcantara Liaguono S, Chen J, Kwon C-H, et al. Malignant astrocytomas originate from neural stem/progenitor cells in a somatic tumor suppressor mouse model. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mikheev AM, Stoll EA, Mikheeva SA, et al. A syngeneic glioma model to assess the impact of neural progenitor target cell age on tumor malignancy. Aging Cell. 2009;8:499–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00494.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Biaglow JE, Miller RA. The thioredoxin reductase/thioredoxin system: novel redox targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:6–13. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.1.1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Griguer CE, Oliva CR, Gillespie GY, et al. Pharmacologic manipulations of mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim) selectively in glioma cells. J Neurooncol. 2007;81:9–20. doi: 10.1007/s11060-006-9201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lam-Himlin D, Espey MG, Perry G, et al. Malignant glioma progression and nitric oxide. Neurochem Int. 2006;49:764–8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Griguer CE, Oliva CR, Gobin E, et al. CD133 is a marker of bioenergetic stress in human glioma. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bolanos JP, Almeida A, Moncada S. Glycolysis: a bioenergetic or a survival pathway? Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35:145–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Pollard PJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Cancer: puzzling patterns of predisposition. Science. 2009;324:192–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1173362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Purow B, Schiff D. Advances in the genetics of glioblastoma: are we reaching critical mass? Nature Rev Neurosci. 2009;5:419–26. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2009.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
