Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2011 Jan 27;13(5):1068–1071. doi: 10.1021/ol103112v

NHC-Catalyzed/Titanium(IV)–Mediated Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Dimerization of Enals

Daniel T Cohen 1, Benoit Cardinal-David 1, John M Roberts 1, Amy A Sarjeant 1, Karl A Scheidt 1,*
PMCID: PMC3045844  NIHMSID: NIHMS268528  PMID: 21271734

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms268528u1.jpg

An NHC-catalyzed, diastereo- and enantioselective dimerization of enals has been developed. The use of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 is a key element for the reactivity and selectivity of this process. The cyclopentenes are obtained with high levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity and their synthetic utility is demonstrated by functionalization of the product alkene.


The field of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalysis has undergone explosive growth over the last decade.1 In addition to a pyruvate decarboxylase-type of acyl anion reactivity2,3 these unique Lewis base catalysts can induce unusual homoenolate reactions which a) create nucleophilic character at the β-position of an enal, and b) involve a terminal acylation event to release the azolium catalyst.4,5 We have been focused on developing new carbene catalyzed reactions and specifically with regard to homoenolates, engaging these nucleophlies with reactive partners to generate new formal [M+N] cycloaddition processes. In our continuing investigations of different X=Y systems (such as azo compounds and azomethine imines, Scheme 1, eq 1) that could be successful reaction partners in these carbene-catalyzed processes, we have encountered what can be viewed as a “vinylogous benzoin” limitation.6 Similarly, for NHC-generated homoenolate reactions, many times the most reactive electrophile present is the homoenolate precursor, or enal 1. Consequently, the major product can be the γ-lactone product when the X=Y reactant does not possess the optimal reactivity (Scheme 1, eq 2, major product).

Scheme 1. Competing NHC Homoenolate Pathways.

Scheme 1

While successful new homoenolate reactions have been realized by judicious choice of electrophile to circumvent the vinylogous benzoin pathway, we have also been investigating alternative strategies to engage NHC-homoenolates in more general reactions.7 An interesting minor product that we have observed in these homoenolate type reactions is the β-lactone product, resulting from the 1,4-addition of the homoenolate (eq 2, minor product).8 This alternate dimerization pathway competes with the more standard 1,2-addition which leads to γ-lactones. Prior to the disclosure of our 1,4-addition observation, both Nair and Bode reported variations of this manifold combining enals and chalcones (Nair)9 or a reactive oxo-butenoate (Bode)10 to produce cyclopentenes after an unusual room temperature decarboxylation.11

Even with the numerous reports of NHC-homoenolate reactions, the factors governing the partitioning between these competing 1,2- vs 1,4-addition pathways are currently not well understood. Additionally, efficient conjugate addition reactions of NHC-derived homoenolates to enals have remained difficult to accomplish efficiently. Our recent success employing Lewis acids with NHC catalysis promoted us to investigate this reaction using a NHC/Lewis acid approach to control the regio- and enantioselectivity outcome. 12 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a highly diastereo- and enantioselective dimerization of these reactive unsaturated carbonyl systems which directly provides useful products for valuable transformations.

Our studies to explore this carbene/Lewis acid possibility began by combining cinnamaldehyde (1a) in THF with a stoichiometric amount of Lewis acid (1 equiv) in the presence of an azolium salt (20 mol %) and DBU at 60 °C. Several metal alkoxides were initially tested in this reaction, but most of them provided the γ-butyrolactones (1,2 addition) or led to the decomposition of the starting material.13 After extensive investigation, we discovered that the use of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 afforded compound 2 as a sole diastereoisomer as detected by NMR spectroscopy (Table 1, entry 1). The evaluation of several of the available chiral azolium salts revealed that phenylalanine-derived azolium C and tryptophan-derived azolium E 14 provided the highest levels of enantioselectivity (entries 3 and 5). Importantly, performing the reaction in the absence of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 did not afford any of 2, which confirmed the essential role of the Lewis acid in this process (entry 6). At this stage, the efficiency and selectivity of the transformation (58% yield, 66% ee) was encouraging, but not synthetically viable. Lowering the temperature to improve the enantioselectivity resulted in a mixture of desired 2 and an intermediate β-hydroxyester (16, Scheme 2), which was observed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. We anticipated that the full elimination of water to yield compound 2 15 could be promoted after consumption of the enal starting material by the addition of excess base. After a short survey of bases and temperature profiles (not shown) a significant improvement in enantioselectivity and yield was obtained when the reaction was conducted in toluene with 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) as the base and 10 mol % of triazolium salt E (entry 7). One key to the high yield of 2 was the addition of an equivalent of TBD after consumption of the enal.16 Finally, decreasing the amount of Lewis acid to substoichiometric levels (e.g., 20 mol %, not shown) resulted in lower yields and enantioselectivities.

Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions.

graphic file with name nihms268528u2.jpg

entry azolium conditionsa yield (%)b ee (%)c
1 A 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 63
2 B 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 0
3 C 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 28 66
4 D 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 45 40
5 E 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 58 66
6d E 0.2 M THF, 40 mol % DBU, 60 °C 0
7e Ef 0.75 M toluene, 20 mol % TBD, 23 °C 61 90
graphic file with name nihms268528u3.jpg
a

All reactions performed on 0.38 mmol scale.

b

Isolated yield.

c

Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy (500 MHz).

d

Reaction performed without Ti(Oi-Pr)4.

e

1.0 equiv of TBD added after 12 h.

f

10 mol % azolium salt and 20 mol % TBD.

Scheme 2. 1H NMR Detection of β-Hydroxyl Intermediate.

Scheme 2

We next evaluated the substrate scope of differentially substituted aryl enals using the chiral triazolium salt E (Table 2).17 Both electron donating and withdrawing substituents were tolerated at the para position, yielding the cyclopentene in 59-61% yield and up to 90% ee. When the para-methyl ester substrate was employed, an increase in yield was observed, but the enantioselectivity decreased slightly (entry 11). Meta-substituted aryl groups at the β-position and naphthyl-derived enals were also tolerated, but the enantiomeric excess was sometimes lower in these cases. Finally, more sterically demanding substrates such as ortho-substituted aryl enals, β-alkyl or α-substituted enals suffered from low yields or no conversion (results not shown).

Table 2. Substrate Scope.

graphic file with name nihms268528u4.jpg

entry R yield (%)a ee (%)b
1 Ph 61 (2) 90
2 p-Br-C6H4 61 (3) 90
3 p-Cl-C6H4 59 (4) 90
4 m-Cl-C6H4 58 (5) 84
5 p-OMe-C6H4 61 (6) 90
6 m-OMe-C6H4 60 (7) 90
7 p-Me-C6H4 61 (8) 90
8 m-Me-C6H4 62 (9) 85
9 1-Naphthyl 59 (10) 85
10 2-Naphthyl 63 (11) 86
11c p-CO2Me-C6H4 72 (12) 84
a

Isolated yield.

b

Enantiomeric excess determined by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. Diastereomeric ratio determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy (500 MHz).

c

2.5 equiv of Lewis acid; transesterification to p-CO2i-Pr-C6H4 was observed.

Our proposed reaction pathway for this dimerization is shown in Scheme 3. The initial coordination of the α,β-unsaturated aldehyde to the titanium(IV) Lewis acid induces the formation of the extended Breslow intermediate I. The coordination of a second enal to the aldehyde-titanium(IV) complex increases its reactivity towards conjugate addition and organizes the reactants in space as shown in II to promote 1,4-addition over 1,2-addition. 18 Both the homoenolate and the enal are thus poised to react through an s-cis conformation, ensuring high cis diastereofacial selectivity in the products. Following the C–C bond formation to give intermediate III, the bis-enolate undergoes protonation, tautomerization and intramolecular aldol to afford IV. The NHC catalyst is then regenerated from acylation of the acyl azolium to give intermediate V and the cyclopentene 2 is formed after base-promoted elimination.

Scheme 3. Proposed Reaction Pathway.

Scheme 3

This new carbene/Lewis acid reaction provides α,β-unsaturated esters that can be processed in highly stereoselective synthetic transformations (Scheme 4). For example, the reduction of the endocyclic double bond under hydrogen atmosphere followed by saponification proceeded in 94% yield over two steps to give the 1,2,3-trisubstituted cyclopentane product 13 as the sole diastereoisomer.19 We next explored the possibility of introducing nucleophiles by conjugate addition on the α,β-unsaturated ester. Treatment of the cyclopentene with lithium dibenzylamide afforded the protected amine 14 in 76% yield as a 6:1 mixture of diastereoisomers.20 These substituted β-amino esters possess unusual substitution patterns that may be useful in conformationally restricted peptides incorporating β-amino acids.21 The ozonolysis of the double bond followed by reductive amination with benzylamine produced the substituted pipecolic acid 15 as a single diastereoisomer.22 Pipecolic acid derivatives are important consituents of biologically active molecules,23 including immunosuppressants,24 N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonists,25 and antibiotics.26

Scheme 4. Synthetic Transformation.

Scheme 4

In summary, an NHC-catalyzed, Lewis acid mediated enantioselective dimerization of enals has been developed. The use of Ti(Oi-Pr)4 promotes a selective 1,4 conjugate addition versus the typical 1,2-addition. Unlike previous cyclopentene constructions using carbene catalysis, the synthetic utility of these compounds is predominantly a function of the unsaturated ester produced in the reaction. The merging of Lewis acid activation with N-heterocyclic carbene Lewis bases is a powerful new strategy that opens new opportunities for catalytic methodology development.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004

Acknowledgments

Financial support has been generously provided by the NIH (RO1-NIGMS), Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline. D.T.C is a recipent of GAANN fellowship. B.C.-D. gratefully acknowledges FQRNT (Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies) for a postdoctoral fellowship. Use of the APS was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy (Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357). Use of the LS-CAT Sector 21 was supported by the Michigan Economic Development Corp. (Grant 085P1000817).

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available Experimental procedures and spectral data for all new compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.For reviews, see: Enders D, Balensiefer T. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:534–541. doi: 10.1021/ar030050j.Nair V, Bindu V, Sreekumar V. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;39:5130–5135. doi: 10.1002/anie.200301714.Zeitler K. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:7506–7510. doi: 10.1002/anie.200502617.Marion N, Diez-Gonzalez S, Nolan SP. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:2988–3000. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603380.Enders D, Niemeier O, Henseler A. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5606–5655. doi: 10.1021/cr068372z.Zeitler K. In: Organocatalysis. Reetz MT, List B, Jaroch S, Weinmann H, editors. Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. pp. 183–206.Glorius F, Hirano K. In: Organocatalysis. Reetz MT, List B, Jaroch S, Weinmann H, editors. Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. pp. 183–206.Phillips EM, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Aldrichimica Acta. 2009;42:55–66.
  • 2.(a) Mizuhara S, Tamura R. Proc Jpn Acad. 1951;87:302. [Google Scholar]; b) Kluger R. Chem Rev. 1987;87:863–876. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jordan F. Nat Prod Rep. 2003;20:184–201. doi: 10.1039/b111348h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jordan F, Nemeria NS, Zhang S, Yan Y, Arjunan P, Furey W. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12732–12738. doi: 10.1021/ja0346126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Frank RAW, Titman CM, Pratap JV, Luisi BF, Perham RN. Science. 2004;306:872–876. doi: 10.1126/science.1101030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Breslow R. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:3719–3726. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yatco-Manzo E, Roddy F, Yount RG, Metzler DE. J Biol Chem. 1959;234:733–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sheehan JC, Hunneman DH. J Am Chem Soc. 1966;88:3666–3667. [Google Scholar]; (d) Sheehan JC, Hara T. J Org Chem. 1974;39:1196–1199. [Google Scholar]; (e) Stetter H, Rämsch RY, Kuhlmann H. Synthesis. 1976:733–735. [Google Scholar]; (f) Stetter H, Kuhlmann H. Org React. 1991;40:407–496. [Google Scholar]; (g) Hassner A. In: Comprehensive Organic Synthesis. Trost BM, Fleming I, editors. Vol. 1. Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1991. pp. 541–604. [Google Scholar]; (h) Enders D, Breuer K, Teles JH. Helv Chim Acta. 1996;79:1217–1221. [Google Scholar]; (i) Breslow R, Schmuck C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:8241–8242. [Google Scholar]; (j) Knight RL, Leeper FJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:3611–3614. [Google Scholar]; (k) Dvorak CA, Rawal VH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2925–2928. [Google Scholar]; (l) White MJ, Leeper FJ. J Org Chem. 2001;66:5124–5131. doi: 10.1021/jo010244h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Enders D, Kallfass U. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1743–1745. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020517)41:10<1743::aid-anie1743>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Kerr MS, Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10298–10299. doi: 10.1021/ja027411v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.For a review of Lewis base catalysis, see: Denmark SE, Beutner GL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:1560–1638. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604943. For a review of NHC-generated homoenolate methodology, see: Nair V, Vellalath S, Babu BP. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:2691–2698. doi: 10.1039/b719083m.
  • 5.(a) Burstein C, Glorius F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:6205–6208. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sohn SS, Rosen EL, Bode JW. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:14370–14371. doi: 10.1021/ja044714b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.For the benzoin reaction, the acyl anion generated in situ adds to the starting material benzaldehyde, thereby typically producing dimeric products.
  • 7.(a) Chan A, Scheidt KA. Org Lett. 2005;7:905–908. doi: 10.1021/ol050100f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:4558–4559. doi: 10.1021/ja060833a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Phillips EM, Wadamoto M, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:3107–3110. doi: 10.1002/anie.200605235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5334–5335. doi: 10.1021/ja0709167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Chan A, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2740–2741. doi: 10.1021/ja711130p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Phillips EM, Reynolds TE, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2416–2417. doi: 10.1021/ja710521m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wadamoto M, Phillips EM, Reynolds TE, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:10098–10099. doi: 10.1021/ja073987e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Nair V, Vellalath S, Poonoth S, Suresh EJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:8736–8737. doi: 10.1021/ja0625677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nair V, Babu BP, Vellalath S, Varghese V, Raveendran AE, Suresh E. Org Lett. 2009;11:2507–2510. doi: 10.1021/ol900571x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Chiang PC, Kaeobamrung J, Bode JW. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:3520–3521. doi: 10.1021/ja0705543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chiang PC, Kaeobamrung J, Bode JW.J Am Chem Soc 20071318714–8715.19530737 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Faulkner DJ. Synthesis. 1971:175–189.Marshall JA, Karas LJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:3615–3616.Mulzer J, Zippel M, Brüntrup G. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1980;19:465–466.Danheiser RL, Nowick JS. J Org Chem. 1991;56:1176–1185. and references cited therein.
  • 12.Raup DEA, Cardinal-David B, Holte D, Scheidt KA. Nature Chem. 2010;2:766–771. doi: 10.1038/nchem.727.Cardinal-David B, Raup DEA, Scheidt KA. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:5345–5347. doi: 10.1021/ja910666n.Cohen DT, Cardinal-David B, Scheidt KA. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011 doi: 10.1002/anie.201005908. Early view. For other examples of NHC-metal cooperative catalysis, see: Nemoto T, Fukuda T, Hamada Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:4365–4368.Lebeuf R, Hirano K, Glorius F. Org Lett. 2008;10:4243–4246. doi: 10.1021/ol801644f.He J, Tang S, Liu J, Sun Y, Pan X, She X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:430–433.Chen Z, Yu X, Wu J. Chem Commun. 2010;46:6356–6358. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01207f.
  • 13.Numerous metal alkoxides were examined including Mg(Ot-Bu)2, Ba(Oi-Pr)2, and Sr(Oi-Pr)2.
  • 14.Maki BE, Chan A, Scheidt KA. Synthesis. 2008:1306–1315. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The absolute and relative stereochemistry of compounds 2 was determined by X-ray crystallography of a related derivative (see Supporting Information) and additional assignments made by analogy.
  • 16.Increasing the loading of the base at the beginning of the reaction (e.g., 120 mol %) resulted in <100% conversion with an effective stalling of the process.
  • 17.The two side products observed in these reactions are; mainly (E)-isopropyl 3-aryl-acrylate, (ref. 14) and the γ-lactone (1,2-addition).
  • 18.For computational studies supporting an NHC homoenolate conjugate addition pathway, see Domingo LR, Zaragozá RJ, Arnó M. Org Biomol Chem. 2010;8:4884–4891. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00088d. For discussion of an alternative benzoin/oxy-Cope pathway, see ref. 10.
  • 19.The relative stereochemistry of compound 13 was determined by X-ray crystallography (Advanced Photon Source) of a related derivative (see Supporting Information).
  • 20.The absolute and relative stereochemistry of compounds 14 was determined by X-ray crystallography of a related derivative (see Supporting Information).
  • 21.For reviews, see: Cheng RP, Gellman SH, DeGrado WF. Chem Rev. 2001;101:3219–3232. doi: 10.1021/cr000045i.Seebach D, Hook DF, Glättli A. Biopolymers. 2006;84:23–37. doi: 10.1002/bip.20391.Horne WS, Gellman SH. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1399–1408. doi: 10.1021/ar800009n. Selected examples: Appella DH, Christianson LA, Klein DA, Powell DR, Huang X, Barchi JJ, Gellman SH. Nature. 1997;387:381. doi: 10.1038/387381a0.Martinek TA, Tóth GK, Vass E, Hollósi M, Fülöp F. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:1718–1721. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020517)41:10<1718::aid-anie1718>3.0.co;2-2.Choi SH, Guzei IA, Spencer LC, Gellman SH. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:2917–2924. doi: 10.1021/ja808168y.
  • 22.The relative stereochemistry of compound 15 was determined by 1H NMR NOESY experiments (see Supporting Information for details and reference to a related transformation).
  • 23.For reviews, see: Weintraub PM, Sabol JS, Kane JM, Borcherding DR. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:2953–2989.Buffat MGP. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:1701–1729.Laschat S, Dickner T. Synthesis. 2000:1781–1813. (d) For a related example, see: Hutchison AJ, Williams M, Angst C, De Jesus R, Blanchard L, Jackson RH, Wilusz EJ, Murphy DE, Bernard PS. J Med Chem. 1989;32:2171–2178. doi: 10.1021/jm00129a025.
  • 24.Dragovich PS, Parker JE, French J, Incuacuan M, Kalish VJ, Kissinger CR, Knighton DR, Lewis CT, Moomaw EW, Parge HE, Pelletier LAK, Prins TJ, Showalter RE, Tatlock JH, Tucker KD, Villafranca JE. J Med Chem. 1996;39:1872–1884. doi: 10.1021/jm950798a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ornstein PL, Schoepp DD, Arnold MB, Leander JD, Lodge D, Paschal JW, Elzey T. J Med Chem. 1991;34:90–97. doi: 10.1021/jm00105a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vanderhaeghe H, Janssen G, Compernolle F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;12:2687–2688. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004

RESOURCES