Abstract
We report a case of sirenomelia sequence observed in an incident of preterm labor during the 29th gestational week. According to some authors, this syndrome should be classified separately from caudal regression syndrome and is likely to be the result of an abnormality taking place during the fourth gestational week, causing developmental abnormalities in the lower extremities, pelvis, genitalia, urinary tract and digestive organs. Despite recent progress in pathology, the etiopathogenesis of sirenomelia is still debated.
Keywords: etiopathogenesis, mermaid syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, sirenomelia
Introduction
The sirenomelia sequence, also known as “mermaid syndrome”, is a polymalformative syndrome where the most noticeable (but inconstant) aspect is the fusion (more or less complete) of the lower limbs. It is a rare syndrome (0.8 to 4.2/100,000 births)1,2 which continues to cause many controversies concerning its etiopathogenesis. Its classification as a variant of caudal regression syndrome (CRS) is still debated, despite the conclusions of Stevenson.3 The same applies regarding its relationship with narrow pelvis syndrome and VATER (vertebral defect, anal atresia, interauricular communication; interventricular communication, tracheal and esophageal atresia, and renal or radial agenesis) syndrome.
We report a case of sirenomelia sequence observed in the obstetrical department of the Aziza Othmana University Hospital of Tunis. Through this case, we will try to shed more light on the classification, etiopathogenesis and management of this syndrome.
Observation
Mrs SK, a woman 25 years old without any noticeable pathological precedent (no diabetes; no teratogenic product use), married for three years to a cousin of the third degree and secondiparous (she had previously given birth to a boy in apparently good health), had been transferred to our department for preterm labor in the seventh month of pregnancy.
The first examination showed a 25 cm uterus, a live fetus and a woman in the first stages of labor. The ultrasound examination performed before the start of tocolysis (LOGIQ 400 Pro 2002 version 5.01 OB/GYN System M-Mode, Color Doppler, PW Doppler, Automatic Tissue Optimization. Reconditioned color Doppler, V5.01, 2 probes connectors, a 3.5 MHz Convex probe for trans-abdominal scanning and a 5 MHz probe for trans-vaginal scanning) showed a single pregnancy at its 29th week of gestation, with an anhydramnios, no bladder and no kidneys, and the ultrasound showed a heterogeneous intra-abdominal image of 4 cm (blind bowel), and a single femur was observed. The absence of amniotic fluid hindered a better morphological study.
Anhydramnios, renal agenesis and the absence of bladder led us to give up the tocolysis and let the labor progress. The delivery occurred three hours after admission. The newborn weighed 1450 g and was polymalformed with a poor Apgar score ( cyanosis, nasal flaring, global hypotonia, cardiac pulse >100 and irregular breathing), and died 20 minutes after birth from respiratory distress, probably owing to pulmonary hypoplasia.
The pathological examination of the newborn revealed:
-
Morphotype abnormalities (Figs. 1 and 2):
-
–
undetermined sex (no external genital organs)
-
–
a single inferior limb: an ectopode “mermaid” terminating in two slender limbs (stumps)
-
–
a Potter’s face (ocular hypertelorism, low-set ears, receding chin and flattening of the nose)
-
–
anal imperforation.
-
–
absence of a urinary orifice.
-
–
-
Internal abnormalities (Figs. 3 and 4)
-
–
a permeable esophagus
-
–
bilateral pulmonary hypoplasia
-
–
normal heart and cardiac vessels
-
–
normal stomach, liver, biliary ducts and pancreas
-
–
two plane-shaped suprarenal glands
-
–
an accessory spleen.
-
–
differentiated male gonads
-
–
absence of a rectum.
-
–
a blind bowel forming a hemorrhagic mass of 4 × 3 cm, containing meconium
-
–
renal and ureteral agenesis.
-
–
a tubular bladder.
-
–
a single umbilical cord artery.
-
–
absence of renal arteries.
-
–
a single non-branching aorta terminating the right iliac artery.
-
–
absence of the inferior mesenteric artery.
-
–
-
The X-ray of the skeleton revealed (Fig. 5):
-
–
chest hypoplasia
-
–
a single femur
-
–
sacral agenesia
-
–
vertebral dysgenesia (L4–L5)
-
–
Figure 1.
Potter’s face (ocular hypertelorism [a], low-set ears [b], receding chin [c] and flattening of the nose [d]). Absence of urinary orifice [e].
Figure 2.
Anal imperforation [a], two slender limbs [b].
Figure 3.
Blind bowel [a], normal liver [b], normal heart [c], renal agenesis [d], absence of rectum [e], aorta [f].
Figure 4.
Tubular bladder.
Figure 5.
Skelton radiograph: Sacral agenesis [a], single femur [b], vertebral dysgenesia [c].
Discussion
Embryology and classification
The abnormalities of embryologic development leading to the sirenomelia sequence occur about the fourth week of gestation, and concern the medio-posterior mesodermic axis and the caudal blastem.4 At this gestational age, the cesspool (cloaca) is formed, the kidneys are located in the pelvis, while the gonads are intra-abdominal. It seems logical that any damage to the caudal extremity of the embryo would affect the development of the external and internal genital organs (except the gonads, which are intra-abdominal), the terminal bowel, the bladder, the kidneys and the pelvic bones.
Before the publication of Stevenson’s studies about sirenomelia’s pathological features in 1986, all caudal extremity development anomalies were grouped under the term caudal regression syndrome (CRS) or sirenomelia sequence. This condition is characterized by a spectrum of abnormalities ranging from anal imperforation in its most mild form to full sirenomelia with fusion of the two lower limbs, which constituted the most severe form.3,5
Since this publication, some authors such as Jones et al4 have adopted a new classification which distinguishes the following:
Caudal regression syndrome (CRS) (also called caudal dysplasia sequence). The principal elements of this are defects in the development of the sacrum, up to agenesia, and alterations of the spinal cord with, as a corollary, more or less severe urinary incontinence and misplacement of the lower limbs. Renal agenesia and anal imperforation are inconstant characteristics. CRS is compatible with life, but at the price of heavy motor and sphincterian sequelae.1
The sirenomelia sequence. This is associated with renal agenesia, an absence of both external and internal genital organs (with differentiated gonads: the sex ratio is 3 boys : 1 girl),4 anal imperforation with absence of a rectuma dysgenesia of the sacrum to agenesia, sometimes associated with lumbar vertebral dysgenesia and a variable degree of atrophy and an inconstant fusion of the lower limbs (Classification of Stocker and Heifetz: Table 1).6,7 The inconstant fusion of the lower limbs and their misplacement have two possible explanations: an absence of the cleavage of the common bud of the lower limbs by allantois, or an absence of the caudal extremity, which prevents the normal rotation of the lower limbs, thus leading to their fusion on the median line.6
Table 1.
Classification of sirenomelia by Stocker and Heifetz6.
| Type | Features |
|---|---|
| I | All thigh and leg bones are present |
| II | Single fibula |
| III | Absent fibula |
| IV | Partially fused femurs + fused fibulae |
| V | Partially fused femurs |
| VI | Single femur + single tibia |
| VII | Single femur + absent tibia |
Other authors, such as Stanton et al1 and Adra et al8 continue to adopt the old classification, which considers sirenomelia (as described in our case) as the most severe form in the continuum constituted by CRS.
In addition to belonging to CRS, another problem is raised that is the inclusion of sirenomelia within the VATER syndrome because of its frequent association with esophageal atresia and cardiac malformations4 or its inclusion within the Small Pelvic Outlet syndrome (a narrowing of the pelvis with the ischions getting closer (to fusion), anal imperforation, renal agenesia or dysplasia, urinary tract dysplasia and anomalies of the external genital organs).9
Etiopathogenesis
Several etiologic factors have been suggested; however none of them explains all the anomalies encountered in the sirenomelia sequence:
Maternal diabetes is the only maternal disease known to be associated with sirenomelia (2% of cases), although this is associated more frequently with CRS (22% of cases).5,10 The hypothetical role of insulin has been removed, since maternal insulin does not pass through the placental barrier and fetal insulin secretion begins only from the 10th gestational week.
Teratogens: retinoic acid, cadmium and cyclophosphamide have been implicated in the genesis of sirenomelia in mice and hamsters.11–13 However, no case of sirenomelia in humans has been observed after incidental maternal exposure to these products. Cocaine, organic solvents of fat and appetite suppressors (diethylpropion) have been implicated in some cases of CRS in humans.14,15
Genetic factors: several family cases of CRS have been reported, as well as some cases of minor vertebral abnormalities in the parents, suggesting a possible genetic transmission. Several modalities of transmission have been suggested: dominant sex-linked transmission, multifactor polygenetic transmission, and dominant autosomic transmission with a variable expression and an attenuated penetrance. Welch et al16 suggested an association between maternal diabetes and a genetic predisposition.
The vascular steal theory: this theory was initially suggested in 1927 by Kampmeier and was called “nutritional deficit”. It was reintroduced in 1986 by Stevenson3 under the term “vascular steal”. Stevenson relied on observations taken from the autopsies of 11 cases of sirenomelia, which determined that the blood returns to the placenta through a large vessel deriving from the vitelline artery and starting from the abdominal aorta (just under the diaphragm). The abdominal aorta does not give any collateral. A mega-artery ensures the function of both umbilical arteries and diverts the blood flow on the embryo’s caudal extremity toward the placenta, causing a nutritional deficit and a lack of development of the caudal extremity. Sirenomelia is quite often accompanied by a unique umbilical artery.6 Our observation of a single umbilical artery, renal agenesis and the absence of renal arteries might support this theory, but the presence of a tubular bladder cannot be explained by vascular steal. The gonads are vascularized, in principle, by collateral arteries of the abdominal aorta starting from the top of the renal arteries. The preservation of the gonads supposes the preservation of their vascularization. The observations of Stevenson reveal the absence of collaterals coming from the abdominal aorta; such observations explain the preservation of gonads (as in our case) only poorly, thus throwing a doubt on the vascular steal theory. The vascular steal theory also fails to explain the frequent association of sirenomelia with other abnormalities such as cranial, cardiac and esophageal defects.5
Adra et al consider Stevenson’s theory of the vascular steal as a possible etiopathogenic of CRS, while Stanton maintains that this theory cannot explain all the abnormalities encountered in the sirenomelia sequence and that the observations of Stevenson are a consequence and not a cause of the syndrome.1,8
The pressure theory (not widely accepted): this implicates certain amniotic forces which act on the caudal extremity of the embryo leading to its hypoplasia. Gardner et al17 suggest that an excessive distention of the neural tube at its caudal extremity leads to lateral rotation of the mesoderm, thus causing a fusion of the lower limbs and a closure of the primitive bowel and the urethra.
Twin pregnancies and sirenomelia sequence: 9% to 15% of the cases of sirenomelia are associated with twin monozygotic pregnancies. The relative risk is multiplied 100-fold in the case of twin pregnancies. 18 A genetic mechanism seems less probable because of the absence of family cases.
Prognostic
Sirenomelia is fatal in most cases because of the characteristic pulmonary hypoplasia and renal agenesia. About 50% of the children are born alive after eight or nine months of pregnancy. Death occurs in the five days following birth.6 Post-natal management requires the presence of kidneys, even if they are dysgenesic.1 Murphy et al19 reported one case where a child born with sirenomelia survived; the infant was neurologically normal and had fused lower extremities, an imperforate anus, colon atresia, bilateral fused pelvic kidneys with renal dysplasia and sacral dysplasia, and genital abnormalities. Laparotomy and colostomy were performed, and an eventual separation of the lower extremities was planned. Clarke et al20 report on a three-month-old infant whose sirenomelia was diagnosed prenatally. The infant was neurologically normal and has fusion of the lower limbs with associated renal dysplasia, an imperforate anus, pelvic and sacral dysplasia, and genital abnormalities. The infant’s anomalies are compatible with life and surgical separation of the lower limbs was planned. Managing sirenomelia is difficult and quite costly, requiring several interventions, the results of which are unpredictable (in the case described by Stanton,1 the patient had five interventions between the age of 15 days and 4 years; she continues to be bedridden and dependent).
Antenatal diagnosis (Table 2)
Table 2.
Prenatal ultra sonographic diagnosis of sirenomelia.
| Authors | Gestational age at diagnosis (weeks’ gestation) | Ultra sonographic diagnosis | Pregnancy outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raabe et al21 | 18 | Oligohydramnios, renal agenesis,a unique lower limb | Medical interruption of pregnancy |
| Loewy et al22 | 23 | Oligohydramnios, a unique femur, renal agenesis, sacral agenesia | Neonatal death |
| Sirtori et al23 | 22–37 | Oligohydramnios, renal agenesis, sireniform abnormalities | Medical interruption of pregnancy |
| Mok24 | 24 | Oligohydramnios, a unique femur, renal agenesis, oligoamnios, sacral agenesis | Delivery at the 33rd gestational week. Death six weeks later |
| 24 | A unique femur, renal agenesis | ||
| Chenoweth25 | 34 | Oligohydramnios, lumbo-sacral agenesis, a unique femur, a unique hip bone | Neonatal death at 34 weeks of gestation |
| Twickler10 | ? | Oligoamnios, a unique femur, suspicion of renal agenesia | ? |
| Sepulveda26 | 32 | Growth restriction, severe oligohydramnios, absence of the bladder, renal agenesis, a unique femur, absence of renal arteries | Labor induced at 34 weeks’ gestation; stillborn infant |
| 22 | Oligohydramnios, unidentified kidneys and bladder, no renal arteries, absence of branching at the level of the fetal pelvis | Delivery at 37 weeks’ gestation. Death shortly after delivery | |
| Carbillon27 | 13 | Oligohydramnios, absence of kidneys and bladder, a unique lower limb. | Early therapeutic abortion |
| Blaisher28 | 15 | Oligohydramnios, femoral bones lying side by side, renal agenesis, bladder absence. Mermaid syndrome visualized by 3D ultrasound. | Therapeutic abortion |
| Monteagudo et al29 | Two cases: first trimester | Increased nuchal translucency, large abdominal vessels, two-vessel umbilical cords, size/date discrepancies. Mermaid syndrome visualized by 3D ultrasound. | Therapeutic abortion |
| Schiesser et al30 | 9 | Fusion of the lower limbs, intra-abdominal cystic structure | Therapeutic abortion |
| Patel and Suchet31 | 19 | Sacral dysplasia, single femur, anorectal atresia, blind-ending colon, renal agenesis, no externa genitalia, anyhdramnios, absence of renal arteries, two-vessel cord | Termination of pregnancy |
| 19 | Sacral agenesis, single femur, blind-ending colon, anorectal atresia, renal agenesis, no external genitalia, anhydramnios, absence of renal arteries, two-vessel cord | Termination of pregnancy | |
| 18 | Hypoplastic colon, imperforated anus, small unilateral kidney, no external genitalia, two femora with fusion of soft tissues, hypoplastic left renal artery, two-vessel cord | Death from renal insufficiency aged 10 days | |
| Browne et al32 | ? | Oligohydramnios, an absent lower limb, absent bladder, renal agenesis, a malformed pelvis, scoliosis, a two-vessel cord. | Delivery at 40th gestational week; stillborn infant |
| Horikoshi et al33 | 24 | Oligohydramnios, renal agenesis, no bladder, a single umbilical artery, only one leg visualized | Delivery at 38 weeks’ gestation, death after 40 min because of a respiratory distress |
| 24 (twin pregnancy) | Growth restriction, anhydramnios, a single umbilical artery, renal agenesia, no bladder, fused legs with a normal number of legs | Cesarean delivery at 36 weeks’ gestation; death occurred five hours later from respiratory distress | |
| Sepulveda34 | 23 | Severe oligohydramnios, small chest, absent bladder, bilateral renal agenesis, a single umbilical artery, absence of renal arteries, no branching of the main abdominal vessel into the normal left and right common iliac arteries | Delivery at 28 weeks’ gestation; death occurred shortly after delivery owing to pulmonary hypoplasia |
| Van Keirsbilck et al35 | 10 | A unique lower extremity, absence of the iliacal branching, uncertainty about the renal tissue | Therapeutic abortion (15 weeks gestation) |
| Akbayir et al36 | 11 | A single pelvic bone, fusion of the lower extremities, a single umbilical artery, absence of the iliacal branching, uncertainty about the presence of renal tissue. 3D ultrasound confirmed the fusion of the lower extremities. | Therapeutic abortion |
| Guven37 | 16 (twin pregnancy) | Fusion of the lower limb | Delivery at 35 weeks’ gestation; death of the affected twin occurred 24 hours after delivery. |
| Sikandar and Munim38 | ? | Bilateral renal agenesis, anhydramnios, a single lower limb | Therapeutic abortion |
| Our case | 29 | Anamnios, renal agenesia, a unique femur, bladder agenesia, abdominal mass | Spontaneous premature delivery; neonatal death |
Since the prognosis is bad, the management of sirenomelia is difficult, with unpredictable results. It seems more than justified to put the emphasis on antenatal diagnosis in order to choose the cases with better prognosis. Antenatal diagnosis is based on a morphologic ultrasound study (oligohydramnios, bilateral renal agenesis, a single lower limb, a unique umbilical artery, absence of a bladder, undetermined external genitalia, anorectal atresia, lumbosacral agenesis). In sirenomelic fetuses, bilateral renal agenesis causes severe oligohydramnios, hindering a reliable sonographic evaluation of the lower extremity in the second and third trimester. In some cases, bilateral renal agenesis is the only sonographic finding. Amnioinfusion and high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonographic probes have proven to be very useful in such a situation.5,10,21 Whereas oligohydramnios is a marker of renal agenesis or non-functioning kidneys in the second half of pregnancy, in earlier gestational stages, other contributors to the production of amniotic fluid production are present. Therefore, early in the second trimester, the amount of amniotic fluid should be sufficient to allow detection of sirenomelic abnormalities. Early diagnosis will allow termination of the pregnancy at an early stage, with minor risks and discomfort for the patient.5
The MRI (magnetic resonance imagery) permits the evaluation of visceral lesions, avoiding the call for amnioinfusion (which carries a risk of fetal injury, infection, membrane rupture and placental injury).
It seems justifiable to insist on the screening of sirenomelia in diabetic women as well as the screening of diabetes in pregnant women.
The therapeutic decision depends on the gestational term at the time of diagnosis, and on the severity of the malformative syndrome and the parents’ wish. Genetic counseling should be proposed because of the reoccurrence risks (estimated to be 3%–5%).
Conclusion
This rare syndrome, the sirenomelia sequence, will continue to divide the scientific community as to its etiopathogeny and its classification. However, to be pragmatic, it seems that the emphasis should be placed both on prenatal diagnosis and genetic to ensure an optimal management that would consequently be less demanding both from a psychological point of view and a health cost point of view.
Footnotes
Disclosures
This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. This paper is unique and is not under consideration by any other publication and has not been published elsewhere. The authors and peer reviewers of this paper report no conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that they have permission to reproduce any copyrighted material. Written consent was obtained from the patients parents to reproduce information and photographs appearing in this work.
References
- 1.Stanton MP, Penington EC, Huston JM. A surviving infant with Sirenomelia (Mermaid syndrome) associated with absent bladder. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(8):1266–8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(03)00286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banerjee A, Faridi MM, Banerjee TK, Mandal RN, Aggarwal A. Sirenomelia. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70(7):589–91. doi: 10.1007/BF02723165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stevenson RE, Jones KL, Phelan MC, et al. Vascular steal: the pathogenic mechanism producing sirenomelia and associated defects of viscera and soft tissues. Pediatrics. 1986;78:451–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jones KL. Smith’s Recognizable Pattern of Human Malformation. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988. p. 574. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Valenzano M, Paoletti R, Rossi A, et al. Sirenomelia. Pathological features, antenatal ultrasonographic clues and a review of current embryogenic theories. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5(1):82–6. doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.1.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stockers JT, Heifetz SA. Sirenomelia : a morphological study of 33 cases and review of the literature. Perspect Pediatr Pathol. 1987;10:7–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harika G, Gabriel R, Bory JP, et al. La sirenomelie. J Gyecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1995;24:49–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Adra A, Cordero D, Mejides A, et al. Caudal regression syndrome: Etio-pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994;49(7):508–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Currarino G, Weinberg A. From small pelvic outlet syndrome to sirenomelia. Pediatr Pathol. 1991;11:195–210. doi: 10.3109/15513819109064759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Twickler D, Budorick N, Pretorius D, et al. Caudal regression versus sirenomlia: Sonographic clues. J Ultasound Med. 1993;12:323. doi: 10.7863/jum.1993.12.6.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Padmanabahn R. Retinoic acid-induced caudal regression syndrome in the mouse fetus. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12(2):139–51. doi: 10.1016/s0890-6238(97)00153-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hilbelink DR, Kaplan S. Sirenomelia: analysis in the cadmium and lead treated golden hamster. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen. 1986;6(5):431–40. doi: 10.1002/tcm.1770060509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baranski B. Effect of exposure of pregnant rats to cadmium on prenatal and postnatal developement of the young. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1984;29(3):253–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sarapong S, Headings V. Sirenomelia accompanying exposure of the embryo to cocaine. South Med J. 1992 May;85(5:):545–7. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199205000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sheinbaum KA, Badell A. Physiatric management of two neonates with limb deficiencies and prenatal cocaine exposure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Apr;73(4:):385–8. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(92)90015-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Welch JP, Aterman K. The syndrome of caudal dysplasia: A review, including etiologic considerations and evidence of heterogeneity. Pediatr Pathol. 1984;2:313. doi: 10.3109/15513818409022263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gardner NJ, Breuer AC. Anomalies of heart, spleen, kidneys, gut and limbs may result from an overdistended neural tube. A hypothesis. Pediatrics. 1980;65:508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dilorenzo M, Brandt ML, Veilleux A. Sirenomelia in an identical twin. A case report. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26:1334. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90614-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murphy JJ, Fraser GC, Blair GK. Sirenomelia: case of a surviving mermaid. J Ped Surg. 1992 Oct 27;(10):1265–8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(92)90270-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Clarke LA, Stringer DA, Fraser GC, Yong SL. Long term survival of an infant with sirenomelia. Am J Med Genet. 1993 Feb 1;45(3:):292–6. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320450303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Raabe RD, Harnsberger HR, Lee TG. Ultrasonographic antenatal diagnosis of “mermaid syndrome”: Fusion of fetal lower extremities. J Ultrasound Med. 1983;2:463. doi: 10.7863/jum.1983.2.10.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Loewy JA, Richards DG, Toi A. In utero diagnosis of the caudal regression syndrome: Report of three cases. J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;15(7):469–74. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870150708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sirtori M, Ghidini A, Romero R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of sirenomelia. J Ultrasound Med. 1989;8:83. doi: 10.7863/jum.1989.8.2.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mok PM. Sirenomelia: Prenatal features. Australas Radiol. 1990;34:68. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1990.tb02811.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chenoweth CK, Kellog SJ, Abu-youssef M. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of sirenomelia. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991;19:167. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870190308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sepulveda W, Corral E, Sanchez J, Carstens E, Shnapp C. Sirenomelia sequence versus renal agenesis: prenatal differentiation with power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11:445–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11060445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carbillon L, Seince N, Largillière C, Bucourt M, Uzan M. First-trimester diagnosis of sirenomelia. A case report. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001 Sep–Oct;16(5):284–8. doi: 10.1159/000053929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blaisher W, Lee A, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G. Sirenomelia: early prenatal diagnosis with combined two and three dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17:542–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00426.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Monteagudo A, Mayberry P, Rebarber A, Paidas M, Timor-Tritsch IE. Sirenomelia sequence: first-trimester diagnosis with both two and three-dimentional sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2002 Aug;21(8:):915–20. doi: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.8.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schiesser M, Holzgreve W, Lapaire O, et al. Sirenomelia, the mermaid syndrome-detection in the first trimester. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:493–5. doi: 10.1002/pd.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Patel S, Suchet I. The role of color and power Doppler ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of sirenomelia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:684–91. doi: 10.1002/uog.1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Browne M, Fitchev P, Adley B, Crawford SE. Sirenomelia with angiomatous lumbosacral myelocystocele in a full term infant. J Perinatol. 2004;24:329–31. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Horikoshi T, Kikuchi A, Tatematsu M, et al. Two cases of a fetus with sirenomelia sequence. Congenit Anom. 2005;45:93–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4520.2005.00074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sepulveda W, Martinez JL, Moenne K. Sirenomelia (Symelia dispus) Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:931–3. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1486-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Van Keirsbilck J, Cannie M, Robrechts C, et al. First trimester diagnosis of sirenomelia. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:684–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Akbayir O, GunGorduk K, Sudolmus S, Gulkilik A, Ark C. First trimester diagnosis of sirenomelia: a case report and review of the litterature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278:589–92. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0619-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guven MA, Uzel M, Ceylaner S, et al. A prenatally diagnosed case of sirenomelia with polydactyly and vestigial tail. Genet Couns. 2008;19(4):419–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sikandar R, Munim S. Sirenomelia, the mermaid syndrome: case report and a brief review of literature. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Oct;59(10:):271–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





