Synopsis
Mammalian mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase (mAspAT) is recently reported to have kynurenine aminotransferase (KAT) activity and plays a role in the biosynthesis of kynurenic acid (KYNA) in rat, mouse and human brains. This study concerns the biochemical and structural characterization of mouse mAspAT. In this study, mouse mAspAT cDNA was amplified from mouse brain first stand cDNA and its recombinant protein was expressed in an Escherichia coli expression system. Sixteen keto acids were tested for the co-substrate specificity of mouse mAspAT and fourteen of them were shown to be capable of serving as co-substrates for the enzyme. Structural analysis of mAspAT by macromolecular crystallography revealed that the cofactor binding residues of mAspAT are similar to those of other KATs. The substrate binding residues of mAspAT are slightly different from those of other KATs. Our data provide a biochemical and structural basis towards understanding the overall physiological role of mAspAT in vivo and insight into controlling the levels of endogenous KYNA through modulation of the enzyme in the mouse brain.
Keywords: aspartate aminotransferase, crystal structure, keto acid, kynurenic acid, kynurenine, kynurenine aminotransferase
Introduction
Kynurenic acid (KYNA) is the only known endogenous antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors [1-4]. KYNA is also the antagonist of the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [5-8]. In mammalian brains, glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter and acts through both ligand-gated ion channels and G-protein-coupled receptors, which are collectively called glutamate receptors [9]. Activation of these receptors is responsible for basal excitatory synaptic transmission and many forms of synaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, which are thought to underlie learning and memory [9, 10]. However, any event or process leading to a sudden or chronic increase in the activity of glutamate receptors often induces the death of neurons [11]. Consequently, a mechanism capable of preventing glutamate receptors from being overly stimulated seems essential for maintaining the normal physiological condition of the brain [12, 13]. Brain KYNA levels are abnormal in the progression of some neurological and psychiatric disorders (see review in [14]), which suggest that variations in brain KYNA, acting as an endogenous modulator of glutamatergic and cholinergic neurotransmission, may be functionally significant.
In addition to the roles KYNA plays in the central nervous system, KYNA has been identified as an agonist for the previously “orphaned” receptor GPR35 [15]. More recently, a study has demonstrated that KYNA is implicated in the regulation of leukocyte binding on the endothelium due to activation of GPR35 by KYNA [16].
KYNA is produced enzymatically by the irreversible transamination of kynurenine, the key intermediate in the tryptophan catabolic pathway. In humans, rats and mice, four proteins arbitrarily named KAT I, II, III and IV, have been considered to be involved in KYNA biosynthesis in the central nervous system [17-23]. KAT I is identical to glutamine transaminase K (GTK) and cysteine conjugate beta-lyase (CCBL) 1; KAT II is identical to aminoadipate aminotransferase (AADAT); KAT III is identical to CCBL 2; and KAT IV is identical to glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) 2 or mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase (mAspAT). These proteins are all pyridoxal 5-phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzymes. Among the individual mammalian KATs, KAT I [20, 24-26] and KAT III [23] share similar genomic structure and high sequence identity [21] and have been assigned to subgroup Iγ in fold type I aminotransferases [14, 27]. KAT II is unique in swapping the catalytically essential N-terminal region [28-30]. A further sequence phylogenetic analysis revealed that KAT II and KAT II homologs form a separate lineage [31]. These indicate that KAT II and its homologs actually form a new subgroup in fold type I aminotransferases, designated as subgroup Iα, the eighth subgroup in the fold type [14]. Based on the sequence information, KAT IV/mAspAT has been assigned to subgroup Iα[27]. AspATs from different sources have been used as a model for studying the mechanism of catalysis for aminotransferases and hundreds of AspAT structures are available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Among these, the only mitochondrial AspAT structures available are from the chicken [32]; there are none from mammals or humans. It has been reported that mAspAT/KAT IV plays a major role in KYNA synthesis in mouse brain [22]. A recent biochemical test supports this assertion [33], indicating that mAspAT/KAT IV could be a primary target for brain KYNA regulation. Here, we report the crystal structure of mouse mAspAT in its PLP form, as well as its structures in complex with substrate kynurenine and co-substrate oxaloacetate. We also provide a kinetic characterization of mAspAT with 12 co-substrates. Determination of the three-dimensional structure of mouse mAspAT may contribute to the rational design of selective inhibitors that are of intense medical interest with respect to a number of human pathological conditions, in which the brain KYNA level is abnormal.
Experimental
Expression and purification recombinant mAspAT
mAspAT coding sequence (GenBank acc no, NM_010325) was amplified from a mouse brain cDNA pool and cloned into an Impact™-CN plasmid (New England Biolabs) for expression of a fusion protein containing a chitin-binding domain. Transformed E. coli cells were cultured and harvested as the start materials for affinity purification. Further purification of the recombinant mAspAT was achieved by ion exchange (Q-sepharose) and gel filtration chromatographies. The purified recombinant mAspAT was concentrated to 10 mg ml-1 protein in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH7.5) using a Centricon YM-30 concentrator (Millipore) [33].
KAT Activity assay
KAT activity assay was based on previously described methods [20, 23, 29]. Briefly, a reaction mixture of 100 μL, containing 5 mM L-kynurenine, 2 mMα-ketoglutarate, 40 μM PLP, and 5 μg of recombinant protein, was prepared using 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). This reaction mixture is identified hereafter as the typical reaction mixture. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at 38°C and the reaction stopped by adding an equal volume of 0.8 M formic acid. The supernatant of the reaction mixture, obtained by centrifugation at 15, 000 g for 10 min at room temperature, was analyzed for the product, KYNA, by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection at 330 nm.
Co-substrate specificity
To determine the substrate specificity for α-keto acids, 16 α-keto acids were individually tested for their ability to function as an amino group acceptor for mouse mAspAT. Each of the 16 α-keto acids was assayed at 2 mM in the presence of 5 mM kynurenine in the 100 μL typical reaction mixture and the rate of KYNA production was determined as described in the KAT activity assay. The kinetic study for α-ketoacid substrates of mouse mAspAT is based on a previously used method [23].
mouse mAspAT Crystallization
The crystals were grown by the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method with the volume of reservoir solution at 500 μL and the drop volume at 2 μL, containing 1 μL of protein sample and 1 μL of reservoir solution. The optimized crystallization buffer consisted of 20% PEG 4000, 100 mM ammonium sulfate, and 6% glycerol. mAspaAT: kynureine complex crystals were prepared by co-crystallizing the enzyme in the presence of 2 mM kynurenine, and mAspaAT: oxaloacetate complex crystals in the presence of 2 mM oxaloacetate (previously neutralized by NaOH).
Data collection and processing
Individual mouse mAspAT crystals were cryogenised using 20% glycerol in the crystallization buffer as a cryo-protectant solution. Diffraction data of mouse mAspAT crystal were collected at the Brookhaven National Synchrotron Light Source beam line X29A (λ = 1.0908 Å). Data were collected using an ADSC Q315 CCD detector. All data were indexed and integrated using HKL-2000 software; scaling and merging of diffraction data were performed using the program SCALEPACK [34]. The parameters of the crystals and data collection are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Data collection and refinement statistics
|
Structure determination
The structure of mouse mAspAT was determined by the molecular replacement method using the published chicken mAspAT (PDB code, 7aat) [32]. The program Molrep [35] was employed to calculate both cross-rotation and translation functions of the model. The initial model was subjected to iterative cycles of crystallographic refinement with the Refmac 5.2 [36] and graphic sessions for model building using the program Coot [37]. Solvent molecules were automatically added and refined with ARP/wARP [38] together with Refmac 5.2.
Analysis of biochemical data and crystal structure
The kinetic parameters of the recombinant enzyme towards different α-keto acids were calculated by fitting the Michaelis–Menten equation to the experimental data using the Enzyme Kinetics Module for SigmaPlot (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL, USA). Superposition of structures was done using LSQKAB [39] in the CCP4 suite. Figures were generated using PyMOL [40]. Protein and substrate interaction were also analyzed using PyMOL [40].
Results
Co-substrate specificity of mouse mAspAT
Mouse mAspAT was tested for KAT activity towards sixteen α-keto acids using 5 mM kynurenine as the amino group donor. Fourteen of them had detectable activity (Fig. 1). Table 2 illustrates the enzyme kinetic parameters towards each α-keto acid, including Km and kcat/Km. Based on kinetic analysis, mouse mAspAT amino group acceptors with Km values less than 4 mM include phenylpyruvate, oxaloacetate, hydroxyphenylpyruvate, α-ketoglutarate, mercaptopyruvate and indo-3-pyruvate.
Figure 1. Transamination activity of mouse mAspAT towards different α-ketoacids.
Purified recombinant mouse mAspAT was incubated with each of 16 α-ketoacids at 2 mM in the presence of 5 mM kynurenine in a typical reaction mixture (100 mM phosphate, pH 7.5). The activity was quantified by the amount of KYNA produced in the reaction mixture.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters of mouse mAspAT towards α-keto acids.
The activities were measured as described in the “Experimental” section. The Km and kcat for α-keto acids were derived by using varying concentrations (0.2 to 50 mM) of individual α-keto acids in the presence of 15 mM of kynurenine. The parameters were calculated by fitting the Michaelis–Menten equation to the experimental data using the Enzyme Kinetics Module of SigmaPlot. Results are means ± SE.
| Km mM | kcat min-1 | kcat/Km min-1mM-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylpyruvate | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 37.7 ± 6.9 | 57.8 |
| Oxaloacetate | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 19.2 ± 2.6 | 21.1 |
| Hydroxyphenylpyruvate | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 24.7 ± 5.5 | 15.7 |
| α-ketoglutarate | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 32 ± 2.7 | 13.4 |
| Mercaptopyruvate | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 26.1 ± 1.6 | 8.1 |
| indo-3-pyruvate | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 29.1 ± 1.1 | 8 |
| αKMB | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 24.8 ± 0.7 | 4.3 |
| Glyoxylate | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 11.4 ± 1.1 | 2.7 |
| Pyruvate | 8.3 ± 1.0 | 22.1 ± 0.9 | 2.7 |
| α-ketocaproic acid | 10.4 ± 1.4 | 24.6 ± 1.2 | 2.4 |
| α-ketobutyrate | 42.2 ± 14.2 | 41.3 ± 7.9 | 1 |
| α-ketovalerate | 10.9 ± 1.5 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 0.7 |
Overall Structure
The structures of mouse mAspAT were determined by molecular replacement and refined to 2.50 Å resolution for the mAspAT PLP form, 2.40 Å resolution for the mAspAT: kynurenine complex, and 2.40 Å resolution for the mAspAT: oxaloacetate complex. Final models contain 4 × 401 amino acid residues each and yield a crystallographic R value of 18.1% and an Rfree value of 23.4% for its PLP form, 17.7% and 19.5% for the mAspAT: oxaloacetate complex, and 17.8% and 18.9% for the mAspAT: Kynurenine complex (Table 1). There are four protein molecules in an asymmetric unit, which form two biological homodimers. The residues of the four subunits in mAspAT structures are numbered 30 (A) – 430 (A) for chain A, 30 (B) - 430 (B) for chain B, 30 (C) - 430 (C) for chain C, and 30 (D) - 430 (D) for chain D. The results of the refinement are summarized in Table 1. The statistics on Ramachandran plot as defined with PROCHECK [41] is also shown in table 1. An overview of the monomer structure model is shown in Fig. 2a. The structure has an N-terminal arm (Residues 30-42), large (Residues 76-348) and small (residues 43-75, 349-430) domains. The residue Asp243 interacts with the pyridine nitrogen of the cofactor, whose structural and functional conservation in fold-type I of the PLP-dependent enzymes, indicates its importance for catalysis. Comparison analysis suggests that mAspAT share similar cofactor binding sites with the other three KATs.
Figure 2. Overall structure.
A, Cartoon representation of the structure of mAspAT monomer. N-terminal arm (pink), small domain (blue) and large domain (green) are shown in different colors. B, Upon superposing all the subunits (11 monomers except chain A in the PLP form) in the three structures onto chain A in the structure of mAspAT PLP form, all the monomers are shown in ribbon. The fragment with significant conformation changes is indicated by an arrow.
Active site of mouse mAspAT
Residual electron density clearly revealed the presence of covalently bound PLP in the cleft situated at the interface of the subunits in the biological dimer of the PLP form of the structure. The C4A atom of PLP is covalently attached to the NZ atom of Lys279 through the formation of an internal Schiff base, and the internal aldimine gives rise to residue LLP279, represented as sticks in Fig. 3. The PLP pyridine ring is stacked between residues Ala245 and Trp162 by hydrophobic interactions. The side chains of Tyr246 and Asp243 are hydrogen bonded to O3 and N1 of the pyridoxal, respectively. The phosphate moiety of PLP is interacting with Thr135, S133, Ser276, Arg287, and the Tyr96 from the other subunit.
Figure 3. The mAspAT active site.
The PLP cofactor and the amino acid residues within a 4 Å distance of PLP are shown in the figure. The residues are colored in teal (subunit A) and green (subunit B). Hydrogen bond lengths are labeled with the unit of Å.
Substrate Recognition and Catalysis
Inspection of the crystal structure of the mAspAT: kynurenine complex revealed that the substrate lies near the N1 atom of PMP, but kynurenine and the cofactor do not form an external aldimine. Several residues, including Ile44, Thr135, Trp162, Asn215, Arg287, and Arg407 from one subunit, and Tyr96, Arg313, Ser317, and Asn318 from the other subunit, define the substrate-binding site and contact the kynurenine molecule. The carboxylic group of the kynurenine substrate forms a salt bridge with the guanidinium group of Arg407. The salt bridge is fixed by hydrogen-bonding interactions with the side chain of Asn215 and Gly65 at both sides of the salt bridge. The ring of Tyr96 (B) has a weak hydrophobic interaction with the phenyl ring of kynurenine in this complex structure (Fig. 4a).
Figure 4. Substrate binding site.
A, Stereo view of the kynurenine binding site in the mAspAT: kynurenine complex structure. The kynurenine substrate (KYN) and the protein residues within 4 Å distance of the kynurenine substrate are shown. The 2Fo - Fc electron density map covering the kynurenine is shown contoured at the 0.7 Sigma level. B, Stereo view of the oxaloacetate (OAA) binding site in the mAspAT: oxaloacetate complex structure. The oxaloacetate substrate (Kyn) and the protein residues within 4 Å distance of the oxaloacetate substrate are shown. The 2Fo - Fc electron density map covering the oxaloacetate is shown contoured at the 0.9 sigma level.
mAspAT binds oxaloacetate in the similar manner in the crystal structure of the mAspAT: oxaloacetate complex as it binds kynurenine in the structure of mAspAT: kynurenine complex described above. As the oxaloacetate molecule is smaller than kynurenine, there are fewer protein residues that interact with oxaloacetate. The Thr135 and Arg287 residues from one subunit, and Asn318 from another subunit, all of which interact with kynurenine, are more than 4 Å distance away from oxaloacetate and consequently are not in close contact with it (Fig. 4b).
Conformational change
Upon superposing all the subunits (11 monomers except chain A in the PLP form) in three structures onto chain A in the structure of mAspAT PLP form, we identified that the large domains were well superposed onto one another and the small domains were not, which suggests that conformational changes occur in the small domain (Fig. 2a). The conformational changes of the small domain cause Ile44 and Arg407 to move and interact with the substrate. This small domain conformational change not only facilitates substrate binding but is also effective for shielding the substrate-binding pocket from bulk solvents. Carefully checking the conformation of substrate binding residues, we determined that there were no significant side chain conformational changes of the substrate binding residues except for a slight change in residue Arg313. It has been reported that by binding substrates, other AspATs and other aminotransferases change their conformations from an open to a closed form [14, 23, 32, 42-47], which involves a large-scale conformational change (domain-domain rotation). It seems that mouse mAspAT uses same mechanism in substrate binding and catalysis.
Discussion
Mouse mAspAT is a major aminotransferase involved in KYNA production in the brain; therefore, it can be considered as a potential regulatory target for maintaining physiological concentrations of brain KYNA. We report herein the co-substrate specificity and crystal structures of mouse mAspAT and its complexes with kynurenine and oxaloacetate. The enzyme can use a number of α-keto acids as co-substrates for KAT activity. The structures of mAspAT PLP form and its complexes with kynurenine and oxaloacetate provide an important molecular basis for a comprehensive understanding of the substrate binding and enzyme catalysis in mAspAT, making it possible to work with structure and ligand-based design of the inhibitors of this enzyme.
There are four KATs in human and rodent brains [14]. The identification of a number of residues that are crucial for ligand binding in the four KAT enzymes were facilitated by the crystal structures in this report, specifically: human KAT I in complex with phenylalanine or indole-3-acetate [24, 25]; human KAT II in complex with KYN [28]; mouse KAT III structure in complex with KYN [23]; and mouse mAspAT in complex with KYN. The substrate α-carboxylate moiety forms a salt-bridge with a structurally conserved Arg and forms a hydrogen bond with a structurally conserved Asn (Fig. 5, the residue with black background). The presence of this Arg residue is a strictly conserved hallmark of all those members of the aminotransferase superfamily whose structures have been determined to date [27]. The recognition of the substrate side chain is achieved specifically by different structural determinants in different KATs. The remarkable structural traits involved in substrate side chain binding of human KAT I, human KAT II, and mouse KAT III have been reviewed previously [14]. KAT I and III have an aromatic hydrophobic pocket which is largely absent in the mouse mAspAT structure. In contrast, the active site of mAspAT tends to resemble KAT II, which may explain why mAspAT and KAT II have similar co-substrate specificity [29].
Figure 5. Comparison of the residues implicated in substrate binding of four selected KATs.
The Arg and Asn residues which bind the substrate α-carboxylate moiety are indicated with white lettering on black background.
The identity of AspAT with KAT was first reported in Escherichia coli [48] and when later mAspAT in mice, rats, and humans was found to have KAT activity, it was named KAT IV [22]. It has been shown that mouse mAspAT has high transamination activity towards glutamate and aspartate, and has detectable activity towards phenylalanine, tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan, 3-HK, methionine, kynurenine, and asparagine [33]. In this study, we demonstrated that mouse mAspAT could use α-ketoglutarate, phenylpyruvate, αKM B , indo-3-pyruvate, hydroxyphenylpyruvate, mercaptopyruvate, α-ketocaproic acid, oxaloacetate, α-ketobutyrate, pyruvate, and glyoxylate as amino group acceptors. Mouse mAspAT was found to be a major player for the formation of KYNA in the mouse brain [22], and this finding is supported by a recent study [33]. However, the inhibition study of mouse mAspAT shows that aspartate, glutamate, glutamine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, cysteine, tryptophan and histidine can competitively inhibit its KAT activity [33]. Since aspartate, glutamate and glutamine are the most abundant proteinogenic amino acids in mouse brains [49], and the specific KAT activity of mouse mAspAT is the lowest of the four mKATs [33], the contribution of mouse mAspAT to KYNA formation in mouse brains would be limited unless kynurenine was highly sequestered from these abundant amino acids. Biochemically, mouse mAspAT primarily catalyzes the reversible transamination of oxaloacetate to aspartate in conjunction with the conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate [50]. The enzyme has a number of specific roles in astrocytes and neurons in brains [51-55]. Firstly, it has a role in the entry of glutamate into the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and the re-synthesis of intramitochondrial glutamate from tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates [53, 56-60]; secondly, it has a key role in the synthesis of the neurotransmitter glutamate in brains [61, 62]; and thirdly, it is an essential component of the malate–aspartate shuttle, which is considered to be the most important mechanism for transferring reducing equivalents from the cytosol into mitochondria in brain tissue [55, 58, 63-66]. All of these functions of mAspAT are related to glutamate or aspartate. Therefore, mAspAT may need to co-localize with these two amino acids, which may limit its ability to catalyze the formation of KYNA. Nevertheless, a considerable portion of the total KAT activity in mouse brain crude proteins seems to be attributable to mAspAT [33], and moreover an earlier report has also indicated that mAspAT was majorly responsible for this KAT activity [22]. Accordingly, the specific contribution of mAspAT in brain KYNA biosynthesis has yet to be substantiated. A gene knock-out study in animal models could address this question definitively.
In addition to the aforementioned roles played by mAspAT as an aminotransferase, mAspAT is identical to a long-chain fatty acid binding protein (FABP) [67-71]. In mammalian tissues, it was suggested that FABPs be involved in at least a substantial portion of overall fatty acid uptake, the first step for the involvement of fatty acids in cellular metabolism. In mice, KAT IV/mAspAT has the lowest KAT specific activity among the four reported KATs [33], but it seems to be a primary contributor for the brain KAT activity in mouse brains [22, 33]. As quantity may compensate for low efficiency, this may indicate a significantly high mAspAT protein level. This relative abundance of mAspAT may enhance its function in long-chain fatty acid binding. As targeting fatty acid oxidation has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy for treating insulin resistance and the rate of fatty acid oxidation is largely affected by fatty acid availability and its uptake into cells, one potential approach to treating insulin resistance is to decrease fatty acid uptake into heart or skeletal muscle [72]. Inhibiting the ability of mAspAT to bind a fatty acid, could lead to the reduction of cellular fatty acid uptake. Studying the mechanism of long-chain fatty acid binding of mAspAT will help elucidate the protein inhibition or inactivation. Although molecular-modelling studies of the crystal structure of mAspAT suggest that the identified pocket within the larger domain of the enzyme might accommodate the typical long-chain fatty acid [73], whether this pocket serves as a fatty acid-binding site remains to be elucidated. A future study of co-crystallization of mouse mAspAT and a long-chain fatty acid could identify the binding site and provide the basis for investigating the inhibition of the fatty acid binding.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Virginia Tech Department of Biological Sciences for the use of their X-ray facility and are grateful to Dr Nancy Vogelaar for helping with screening the crystals prior to synchrotron data collection, to Haizhen Ding for helping with protein expression, and to Elizabeth Watson for critically reading this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant from NINDS (NS062836) and Intramural Research Programs of NIDCR and NINDS at NIH. The study was carried out in part at the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Abbreviations
- KAT
kynurenine aminotransferase
- αKMB
α-keto-γ-methiobutyric acid
- KYNA
kynurenic acid
- mAspAT
mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase
- LLP
lysine-pyridoxal-5’-phosphate
- PLP
pyridoxal-5’-phosphate
- PMP
pyridoximine 5’-phosphate
Footnotes
The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes: 3HLM, 3PD6 and 3PDB) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org).
References
- 1.Leeson PD, Iversen LL. The glycine site on the NMDA receptor: structure-activity relationships and therapeutic potential. J. Med. Chem. 1994;37:4053–4067. doi: 10.1021/jm00050a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Perkins MN, Stone TW. An iontophoretic investigation of the actions of convulsant kynurenines and their interaction with the endogenous excitant quinolinic acid. Brain Res. 1982;247:184–187. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)91048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stone TW, Perkins MN. Actions of excitatory amino acids and kynurenic acid in the primate hippocampus: a preliminary study. Neurosci. Lett. 1984;52:335–340. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(84)90184-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Birch PJ, Grossman CJ, Hayes AG. Kynurenic acid antagonises responses to NMDA via an action at the strychnine-insensitive glycine receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1988;154:85–87. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90367-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pereira EF, Hilmas C, Santos MD, Alkondon M, Maelicke A, Albuquerque EX. Unconventional ligands and modulators of nicotinic receptors. J. Neurobiol. 2002;53:479–500. doi: 10.1002/neu.10146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hilmas C, Pereira EF, Alkondon M, Rassoulpour A, Schwarcz R, Albuquerque EX. The brain metabolite kynurenic acid inhibits alpha7 nicotinic receptor activity and increases non-alpha7 nicotinic receptor expression: physiopathological implications. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:7463–7473. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07463.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alkondon M, Pereira EF, Yu P, Arruda EZ, Almeida LE, Guidetti P, Fawcett WP, Sapko MT, Randall WR, Schwarcz R, Tagle DA, Albuquerque EX. Targeted deletion of the kynurenine aminotransferase ii gene reveals a critical role of endogenous kynurenic acid in the regulation of synaptic transmission via alpha7 nicotinic receptors in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:4635–4648. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5631-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stone TW. Kynurenic acid blocks nicotinic synaptic transmission to hippocampal interneurons in young rats. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;25:2656–2665. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Palmada M, Centelles JJ. Excitatory amino acid neurotransmission. Pathways for metabolism, storage and reuptake of glutamate in brain. Front Biosci. 1998;3:d701–718. doi: 10.2741/a314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RG. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2000;23:649–711. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ogura A, Miyamoto M, Kudo Y. Neuronal death in vitro: parallelism between survivability of hippocampal neurones and sustained elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ after exposure to glutamate receptor agonist. Exp. Brain Res. 1988;73:447–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00406601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Stone TW, Addae JI. The pharmacological manipulation of glutamate receptors and neuroprotection. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002;447:285–296. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01851-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stone TW, Darlington LG. Endogenous kynurenines as targets for drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002;1:609–620. doi: 10.1038/nrd870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han Q, Cai T, Tagle DA, Li J. Structure, expression, and function of kynurenine aminotransferases in human and rodent brains. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:353–368. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang J, Simonavicius N, Wu X, Swaminath G, Reagan J, Tian H, Ling L. Kynurenic acid as a ligand for orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR35. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:22021–22028. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603503200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barth MC, Ahluwalia N, Anderson TJ, Hardy GJ, Sinha S, Alvarez-Cardona JA, Pruitt IE, Rhee EP, Colvin RA, Gerszten RE. Kynurenic acid triggers firm arrest of leukocytes to vascular endothelium under flow conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:19189–19195. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.024042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Okuno E, Nakamura M, Schwarcz R. Two kynurenine aminotransferases in human brain. Brain Res. 1991;542:307–312. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91583-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guidetti P, Okuno E, Schwarcz R. Characterization of rat brain kynurenine aminotransferases I and II. J. Neurosci. Res. 1997;50:457–465. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19971101)50:3<457::AID-JNR12>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schwarcz R, Pellicciari R. Manipulation of brain kynurenines: glial targets, neuronal effects, and clinical opportunities. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002;303:1–10. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.034439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Han Q, Li J, Li J. pH dependence, substrate specificity and inhibition of human kynurenine aminotransferase I. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004;271:4804–4814. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu P, Li Z, Zhang L, Tagle DA, Cai T. Characterization of kynurenine aminotransferase III, a novel member of a phylogenetically conserved KAT family. Gene. 2006;365:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guidetti P, Amori L, Sapko MT, Okuno E, Schwarcz R. Mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase: a third kynurenate-producing enzyme in the mammalian brain. J. Neurochem. 2007;102:103–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Han Q, Robinson H, Cai T, Tagle DA, Li J. Biochemical and structural properties of mouse kynurenine aminotransferase III. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009;29:784–793. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01272-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rossi F, Han Q, Li J, Li J, Rizzi M. Crystal structure of human kynurenine aminotransferase I. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:50214–50220. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409291200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Han Q, Robinson H, Cai T, Tagle DA, Li J. Structural Insight into the Inhibition of Human Kynurenine Aminotransferase I/Glutamine Transaminase K. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:2786–2793. doi: 10.1021/jm9000874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cooper AJ, Pinto JT, Krasnikov BF, Niatsetskaya ZV, Han Q, Li J, Vauzour D, Spencer JP. Substrate specificity of human glutamine transaminase K as an aminotransferase and as a cysteine S-conjugate beta-lyase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;474:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.02.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jensen RA, Gu W. Evolutionary recruitment of biochemically specialized subdivisions of Family I within the protein superfamily of aminotransferases. J. Bacteriol. 1996;178:2161–2171. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2161-2171.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han Q, Robinson H, Li J. Crystal structure of human kynurenine aminotransferase II. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:3567–3573. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708358200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Han Q, Cai T, Tagle DA, Robinson H, Li J. Substrate specificity and structure of human aminoadipate aminotransferase/kynurenine aminotransferase II. Biosci. Rep. 2008;28:205–215. doi: 10.1042/BSR20080085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rossi F, Garavaglia S, Montalbano V, Walsh MA, Rizzi M. Crystal structure of human kynurenine aminotransferase II, a drug target for the treatment of schizophrenia. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:3559–3566. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M707925200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tomita T, Miyagawa T, Miyazaki T, Fushinobu S, Kuzuyama T, Nishiyama M. Mechanism for multiple-substrates recognition of alpha-aminoadipate aminotransferase from Thermus thermophilus. Proteins. 2009;75:348–359. doi: 10.1002/prot.22245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McPhalen CA, Vincent MG, Jansonius JN. X-ray structure refinement and comparison of three forms of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase. J. Mol. Biol. 1992;225:495–517. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90935-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Han Q, Cai T, Tagle DA, Li J. Thermal stability, pH dependence and inhibition of four murine kynurenine aminotransferases. BMC Biochemistry. 2010;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-11-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray Diffraction Data Collected in Oscillation Mode. Methods in Enzymology. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vagin A, Teplyakov A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Cryst. 1997;30:1022–1025. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. 2004;D60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Perrakis A, Sixma TK, Wilson KS, Lamzin VS. wARP: improvement and extension of crystallographic phases by weighted averaging of multiple refined dummy atomic models. Acta Cryst. D. 1997;53:448–455. doi: 10.1107/S0907444997005696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kabsch W. Crystal Physics, Diffraction, Theoretical and General Crystallography. Acta Cryst. . 1976;A32:922–923. [Google Scholar]
- 40.DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Delano Scientifc; San Carlos, CA, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laskowski RA, Macarthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. Procheck - a Program to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rhee S, Silva MM, Hyde CC, Rogers PH, Metzler CM, Metzler DE, Arnone A. Refinement and comparisons of the crystal structures of pig cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase and its complex with 2-methylaspartate. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:17293–17302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Miyahara I, Hirotsu K, Hayashi H, Kagamiyama H. X-ray crystallographic study of pyridoxamine 5'-phosphate-type aspartate aminotransferases from Escherichia coli in three forms. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1994;116:1001–1012. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Malashkevich VN, Strokopytov BV, Borisov VV, Dauter Z, Wilson KS, Torchinsky YM. Crystal structure of the closed form of chicken cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase at 1.9 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 1995;247:111–124. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Okamoto A, Higuchi T, Hirotsu K, Kuramitsu S, Kagamiyama H. X-ray crystallographic study of pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-type aspartate aminotransferases from Escherichia coli in open and closed form. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1994;116:95–107. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jager J, Moser M, Sauder U, Jansonius JN. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase in two conformations. Comparison of an unliganded open and two liganded closed forms. J. Mol. Biol. 1994;239:285–305. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Han Q, Gao YG, Robinson H, Li J. Structural insight into the mechanism of substrate specificity of Aedes kynurenine aminotransferase. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1622–1630. doi: 10.1021/bi701800j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Han Q, Fang J, Li J. Kynurenine aminotransferase and glutamine transaminase K of Escherichia coli: identity with aspartate aminotransferase. Biochem. J. 2001;360:617–623. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3600617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Murakami T, Yamane H, Tomonaga S, Furuse M. Forced swimming and imipramine modify plasma and brain amino acid concentrations in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;602:73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cooper AJ, Meister A. Metabolic significance of transamination. In: Christen P, Metzler DE, editors. Transaminases. Wiley; New York: 1985. pp. 500–580. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Moran J, Alavez S, Rivera-Gaxiola M, Valencia A, Hurtado S. Effect of NMDA antagonists on the activity of glutaminase and aspartate aminotransferase in the developing rat cerebellum. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 1999;17:57–65. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(98)00063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moran J, Rivera-Gaxiola M. Effect of potassium and N-methyl-D-aspartate on the aspartate aminotransferase activity in cultured cerebellar granule cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 1992;33:239–247. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490330207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Westergaard N, Drejer J, Schousboe A, Sonnewald U. Evaluation of the importance of transamination versus deamination in astrocytic metabolism of [U-13C]glutamate. Glia. 1996;17:160–168. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199606)17:2<160::AID-GLIA7>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yudkoff M, Daikhin Y, Nissim I, Horyn O, Lazarow A, Luhovyy B, Wehrli S. Response of brain amino acid metabolism to ketosis. Neurochem. Int. 2005;47:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McKenna MC, Stevenson JH, Huang X, Hopkins IB. Differential distribution of the enzymes glutamate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase in cortical synaptic mitochondria contributes to metabolic compartmentation in cortical synaptic terminals. Neurochem. Int. 2000;37:229–241. doi: 10.1016/s0197-0186(00)00042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schousboe A, Westergaard N, Sonnewald U, Petersen SB, Huang R, Peng L, Hertz L. Glutamate and glutamine metabolism and compartmentation in astrocytes. Dev. Neurosci. 1993;15:359–366. doi: 10.1159/000111356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hertz L, Drejer J, Schousboe A. Energy metabolism in glutamatergic neurons, GABAergic neurons and astrocytes in primary cultures. Neurochem. Res. 1988;13:605–610. doi: 10.1007/BF00973275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McKenna MC, Tildon JT, Stevenson JH, Boatright R, Huang S. Regulation of energy metabolism in synaptic terminals and cultured rat brain astrocytes: differences revealed using aminooxyacetate. Dev. Neurosci. 1993;15:320–329. doi: 10.1159/000111351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sonnewald U, Westergaard N, Schousboe A. Glutamate transport and metabolism in astrocytes. Glia. 1997;21:56–63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(199709)21:1<56::aid-glia6>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McKenna MC, Tildon JT, Stevenson JH, Huang X. New insights into the compartmentation of glutamate and glutamine in cultured rat brain astrocytes. Dev. Neurosci. 1996;18:380–390. doi: 10.1159/000111431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Palaiologos G, Hertz L, Schousboe A. Role of aspartate aminotransferase and mitochondrial dicarboxylate transport for release of endogenously and exogenously supplied neurotransmitter in glutamatergic neurons. Neurochem. Res. 1989;14:359–366. doi: 10.1007/BF01000039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Palaiologos G, Hertz L, Schousboe A. Evidence that aspartate aminotransferase activity and ketodicarboxylate carrier function are essential for biosynthesis of transmitter glutamate. J. Neurochem. 1988;51:317–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb04872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fitzpatrick SM, Cooper AJ, Duffy TE. Use of beta-methylene-D,L-aspartate to assess the role of aspartate aminotransferase in cerebral oxidative metabolism. J. Neurochem. 1983;41:1370–1383. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1983.tb00835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cheeseman AJ, Clark JB. Influence of the malate-aspartate shuttle on oxidative metabolism in synaptosomes. J. Neurochem. 1988;50:1559–1565. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb03044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McKenna MC, Waagepetersen HS, Schousboe A, Sonnewald U. Neuronal and astrocytic shuttle mechanisms for cytosolic-mitochondrial transfer of reducing equivalents: current evidence and pharmacological tools. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006;71:399–407. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.McKenna MC, Hopkins IB, Lindauer SL, Bamford P. Aspartate aminotransferase in synaptic and nonsynaptic mitochondria: differential effect of compounds that influence transient hetero-enzyme complex (metabolon) formation. Neurochem. Int. 2006;48:629–636. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2005.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Stremmel W, Strohmeyer G, Borchard F, Kochwa S, Berk PD. Isolation and partial characterization of a fatty acid binding protein in rat liver plasma membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1985;82:4–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Berk PD, Wada H, Horio Y, Potter BJ, Sorrentino D, Zhou SL, Isola LM, Stump D, Kiang CL, Thung S. Plasma membrane fatty acid-binding protein and mitochondrial glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase of rat liver are related. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1990;87:3484–3488. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bradbury MW, Berk PD. Mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase: direction of a single protein with two distinct functions to two subcellular sites does not require alternative splicing of the mRNA. Biochem. J. 2000;345(Pt 3):423–427. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Stump DD, Zhou SL, Berk PD. Comparison of plasma membrane FABP and mitochondrial isoform of aspartate aminotransferase from rat liver. Am. J. Physiol. 1993;265:G894–902. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1993.265.5.G894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Glatz JF, Luiken JJ, Bonen A. Membrane fatty acid transporters as regulators of lipid metabolism: implications for metabolic disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010;90:367–417. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang L, Keung W, Samokhvalov V, Wang W, Lopaschuk GD. Role of fatty acid uptake and fatty acid beta-oxidation in mediating insulin resistance in heart and skeletal muscle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010;1801:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Roepstorff C, Helge JW, Vistisen B, Kiens B. Studies of plasma membrane fatty acid-binding protein and other lipid-binding proteins in human skeletal muscle. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004;63:239–244. doi: 10.1079/PNS2004332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





