Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 19;32(3):351–358. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq251

Table IV.

Histopathological analysis of forestomach lesions

Genotype Treatment Total mice Incidence
Missing sample Normal Mild hyperplasia Severe hyperplasia Hyperplasia with dysplasiaa Carcinoma
B6 No Zn 24 0 0 1 (4%) 19 (79%) 11 (46%) 4 (17%)
Zn 29 1 3 (11%) 17 (61%) 8 (29%) 6 (21%) 0
Fhit−/− No Zn 34 1 4 (12%) 25 (76%) 4 (12%) 7 (21%) 0
Zn 29 0 6 (21%) 18 (62%) 5 (17%) 2 (7%) 0
Fhit−/−Nit1−/− No Zn 24 2 0 2 (9%) 16 (73%) 8 (36%) 4 (18%)
Zn 26 1 2 (8%) 6 (24%) 17 (68%) 3 (12%) 0
Fhit−/−Rassf1a−/− No Zn 26 0 0 7 (27%) 17 (65%) 7 (27%) 2 (8%)
Zn 27 0 1 (4%) 13 (48%) 12 (44%) 6 (22%) 1 (4%)
a

The hyperplasia with dysplasia column lists the number of mice with mild or severe hyperplasia, that also exhibited dysplasia. chi-square test showed significant differences between Zn and no Zn treatment for B6 (P = 0.003) and Fhit−/−Nit1−/− (P = 0.002) mice in terms of the number of mice with carcinoma and dysplasia (hyperplasia w dysplasia + carcinoma) versus those without dysplasia (normal + mild + severe hyperplasia—hyperplasia w dysplasia), and the P values for Fhit−/− and Fhit−/−Rassf1a−/− mice were 0.11 and 0.491, respectively.