Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 2.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2009 Oct 15;11(20):4672–4675. doi: 10.1021/ol901948d

Silyl-Substituted Spirodiepoxides: Stereoselective Formation and Regioselective Opening

Partha Ghosh 1,, Joseph R Cusick 1,, Jennifer Inghrim 1, Lawrence J Williams 1,*
PMCID: PMC3047402  NIHMSID: NIHMS147475  PMID: 19810767

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms147475u1.jpg

A short synthesis of the natural product epi-citreodiol and the method developed to gain access to this target are described. Key advances focus on silyl substituted allenes. Upon exposure to dimethyldioxirane, spirodiepoxides form with high face selectivity and subsequently react at the silyl terminus.


Here we report direct entry to enantioenriched α′-hydroxy enones and its derivative enediols. These motifs are widely distributed among natural products, especially polyketides, such as gabosine A,1 hypothemycin,2 picromycin,3 incednine,4 and epi-citreodiol,5 among others. In principle, spirodiepoxide methodology offers a means by which to access such motifs.6 The efficiency of the transformation from allene to derivatized spirodiepoxide has been limited by the selectivity of allene epoxidation. In other studies we described the challenges associated with epoxidation of 1,3 disubstituted allenes.7 As briefly shown in Scheme 1, the stereoselectivity of the first epoxidation of an allene of type I (R1 = R2) is excellent [III (major) and III (minor), dr > 20:1]. Epoxidation of allene oxides (e.g. II and III) is usually less selective. For example, linear, unfunctionalized substituents lead to low ratios of spirodiepoxide products [IIIV (major) and V (minor), dr ∼ 2:1]. The situation is complicated by issues of site selectivity as well. In cases for I where R1 ≠ R2 two different allene oxides could form, each with high facial selectively, and thereby lead to a total of three spirodiepoxides (IIV-VI).7 Moreover, there is an additional problem: subsequent nucleophilic or eliminative opening would generate two regioisomeric products from each spirodiepoxide (e.g. IVVII and VIII). We wondered whether the presence of a silyl substituent would address each of these issues simultaneously and in so doing achieve the selective conversion of allenes to substituted ketone derivatives.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Model for stereoselective spirodiepoxidation.

It was not clear at the outset that the presence of a silyl substituent would successfully address the issues of regio and stereoselective allene epoxidation (Scheme 1). The concern was that the first oxidation of an allene of type IX might take place at the double bond distal to the silyl group (IXX). Since face selectivity in these systems is governed by steric factors of the non-reacting terminus, the bulk of the silyl substituent could well render the oxidation face-selective. However, the second oxidation of the resulting allene oxide would be expected to be low (XXII and XIII), in analogy to the conversion of II to IV and V – compare this with the alternative scenario wherein the first oxidation takes place on the double bond bearing the silyl group (IXXI). This oxidation should be highly selective in analogy to III, and the second oxidation, XIXII, could well be selective due to the bulk of the silyl substituent.

The electronic effects of silyl substitution are well documented.8 In the context of allene epoxidation, the α-effect favors the desired outcome (IXXI), whereas the β-effect does not. We evaluated the possibilities computationally. Density functional calculations9 of silyl substituted allenes 1–4 indicate that the position of the HOMO depends upon the substitution pattern (Figure 1). For trisubstituted silyl allene 3, the HOMO resides at the double bond adjacent to the silyl group and suggests that in the absence of overriding factors epoxide formation for this type of allene will be selective for this site as desired.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

DFT calculated position of the HOMO of silyl substituted allenes.

A preliminary assessment of silyl substituted allenes and the resultant spirodiepoxides is presented in Scheme 2 and Table 1. Consistent with the above computational and stereochemical analysis, exposure of silyl substituted allene 5 to DMDO/chloroform solutions7 gave spirodiepoxide 6 along with a minor diastereomer (dr = 10:1) as indicated by 400 mHz 1H NMR analysis. This highly selective formation of a spirodiepoxide strongly suggests that the silyl group dictates site-selective epoxidation of the proximal allene double bond (dr > 20:1) and the stereoselective epoxidation of the resultant allene oxide (dr ≈ 10:1). Such spirodiepoxides appear stable towards many nucleophiles that are known to react readily with non-silyl spirodiepoxides, such as water, alcohol, and azide (data not shown). Interestingly, treatment of 6 with benzoic acid resulted in the selective formation of α-hydroxy-α′-benzoyl ketone 7 in an overall yield of 82%. The efficiency of this reaction was unexpected, since acids effect decomposition of non-silyl spirodiepoxides to many products.6f,10 Structural analysis (1H NMR) supports the assignment shown and indicates that benzoate added to the carbon bearing the silyl substituent. Recently, we reported a method for synthesizing carbinol-functionalized azoles from spirodiepoxides.6e Accordingly, treatment of the epoxidation product derived from allene 5 with thiobenzamide in chloroform gave a 1:1 ratio of carbinol-functionalized thiazolines 8a and 8b. Under these conditions the silyl group migrated to the adjacent oxygen. Use of methanol instead of chloroform gave a 1:1 ratio of non-silyl thiazolines 9a and 9b. Dehydrative aromatization of thiazolines 8 and 9 gave a single thiazole (10). Crystallographic analysis of 8a confirmed the structure of the thioamide and by analogy 6-10, 12, and 13 (Table 1). Thus, silyl substitution dictates both regio- and stereoselective allene epoxidation and subsequent regioselective opening of the spirodiepoxide intermediate.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Silyl-directed spirodiepoxidation.

Table 1.

Single flask preparation of functionalized azoles.

graphic file with name nihms147475u2.jpg

entry allene amide product time (h) condition yield (%) era
1 5 C6H6CSNH2 10 12 A 80 97%
2 5 C6H6CONH2 12 48 A 52 95%
3 5 C6H6CNHNH2 13 48 B 72 >95%
4 11 C6H6CSNH2 10 24 A 76 98%
5 11 C6H6CNHNH2 13 48 B 78 >95%

Condition A: DMDO/CHCl3, -40 °C to rt, 2 h; 3 equiv amide, MeOH, rt, then 10 mol % p-TSOH, reflux. Conditon B: DMDO/CHCl3, -40 °C to rt, 2 h; 5 equiv amide, MeOH, rt. a) er (enantiomeric ratio) was determined by chiral HPLC except for entries 3 and 5, which were based on the dr (diastereomeric ratio) assessed by Mosher ester analysis.

Table 1 catalogs data related to the behavior of enantioentriched allenes 5 and 11 and their stereoselective, single flask conversion to azoles of type 10, 12, and 13. The enantiomeric ratios of the products are excellent and reflect the stereoselectivity of spirodiepoxide formation. Addition of thiobenzamide and benzamidine gave good yields of thiazole and imidazole. Benzamide reacted, albeit slowly, with the spirodiepoxide derived from 5 to give oxazole 12 in modest yield but did not react under these conditions with the spirodiepoxide derived from 11. The addition is slow in comparison to addition to non-silyl spirodiepoxides. This is despite the presense of methanol, an additive known to facilitate spirodiepoxide opening.6b,d,11

In all cases studied, silyl migration occurred rapidly, and the use of methanol promoted the loss of silyl altogether. The conditions for migration leading to 8 and 9 are remarkably mild. Regardless of solvent, there was no evidence of the formation of intermediate structures. Although silyl migration is known,12 in this case it appears to be facilitated by the combination of the geminally positioned sulfur, nitrogen, or oxygen and the vicinal hydroxyl.

Encouraged by the above results, we set out to realize the eliminative opening of spirodiepoxides (XIVXVII, Scheme 3). Proteodesilylation of α-hydroxy silylenones12,13 and site-selective eliminative opening of silyl substituted epoxides are known.14,15 We examined this type of elimination for spirodiepoxides derived from 5, 14 and 15 (Table 2). Brønsted and Lewis acids in polar solvent were found to effect enone formation (entries 1-3). Interestingly, so did cyclopentadienyl titanium (IV) chloride in combination with zinc dust, (compare entries 1-3 with 4-6).16,17

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Silyl-directed eliminative opening

Table 2.

Spirodiepoxide eliminative opening.

graphic file with name nihms147475u3.jpg

entry allene reagent conditions product (E:Z) yield (%)
1 14 PTSA CHCl3, -78 °C, 1 h 17 58
2 14 MgBr2, Et3N DCM, -40 °C, 2 h 17 54
3 14 SiO2 CHCl3, rt, 6 h 17 60
4 14 Cp2TiCI2, Zn THF, -60 °C, 10 min 17 66
5 5 Cp2TiCI2, Zn THF, -60 °C, 10 min 16 (1:1) 72
6 15 Cp2TiCI2, Zn THF, -60 °C, 10 min 18 (1:5) 74
7 14 CH3Li Et2O, -40 °C to rt, 2 h 20 85
8 5 CH3Li Et2O, -40 °C to rt, 2 h 19 (2.2:1) 83
9 15 CH3Li Et2O, -40 °C to rt, 2 h 21 (16:1) 86
10 14 CH3MgBr Et2O, -78 °C to 0 °C, 2 h 20 48
11 5 CH3MgBr Et2O, -78 °C to 0 °C, 2 h 19 (1:3.4) 40
12 15 CH3MgBr Et2O, -78 °C to 0 °C, 2 h 21 (1:12) 38

In contrast to the titanium mediated reaction, which favors the α′-hydroxy-Z-enone product (16–18), the organolithium and Grignard reagents gave α,β-dihydroxy olefins directly (19–21 entries 7–12). Athough difficult to rationalize, the E/Z selectivity appears to depend on both the substrate structure and the reagents employed. When methyllithium was used 21 was isolated in excellent yield (entry 9). The E/Z geometry strongly favored the E product. No evidence of the isomeric tertiary alcohol was obtained as only the chelation controlled addition product was observed. Crystallographic analysis of this product established the relative stereochemistry and confirmed the olefin geometry assignment. Methyl magnesium bromide, however, gave 21 favoring Z enone albeit in lower yield.

Lastly, we used silyl-substituted allenes to the first total synthesis of epi-citreodiol (22, Scheme 4). This natural product was isolated, along with citreodiol, from the mycelium of Penicillium citreo-viride B. (IFO 6050)5 and is related to the potent inhibitor of ATP-synthesis and ATP-hydrolysis, citreoviridin (23).18 Our synthesis began with known allene 24.19 Exposure of 24 to DMDO in chloroform, treatment with methyllithium in ether, and then proteodesilation13 in acetonitrile gave 25 as a single isomer in 69% yield. This sequence was run in a single flask. Although direct olefin cross metathesis of 25 with 28 failed to give the desired product, the synthesis was nevertheless completed in a second single flask procedure. Olefin metathesis with acrolein and catalyst 2620 (→27) followed by Wittig olefination21 gave 22 as a single isomer in excellent overall yield. The structural characteristics of synthetic 22 were identical to the published NMR and optical rotation data for natural epi-citreodiol, e.g. [α]D23 -7.5° (c = 2.3, CHCl3), lit5: [α]D21 -7.1° (c = 2.3, CHCl3). Thus direct entry to this natural product was realized without recourse to protecting group strategies with high efficiency and selectively via the silyl subsituted spirodiepoxide.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of epi-citreodiol

In summary, preliminary assessment of silyl substituted allenes reveals that this arrangement is an excellent means by which to control regio and stereoselective spirodiepoxide formation. Moreover, silyl-substituted spirodiepoxides are shown to undergo subsequent site-selective nucleophilic and eliminative opening. Further studies are ongoing and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

NIH (GM-078145) is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available Synthetic methods and characterization data (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Bach G, Breiding-Mack S, Grabley S, Hammann P, Huetter K, Thiericke R, Uhr H, Wink J, Zeeck A. Liebigs Ann Chem. 1993:241. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agatsuma T, Takahashi A, Kabuto C, Nozoe S. Chem Pharm Bull. 1993;41:373. doi: 10.1248/cpb.41.1726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Brockmann H, Henkel W. Naturwissenschaften. 1950;37:138. [Google Scholar]; (b) Muxfeldt H, Shrader S, Hansen P, Brockmann H. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90:4748. doi: 10.1021/ja01019a055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Futamura Y, Sawa R, Umezawa Y, Igarashi M, Nakamura H, Hasegawa K, Yamasaki M, Tashiro E, Takahashi Y, Akamatsu Y, Imoto M. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:1822. doi: 10.1021/ja710124p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shizuri Y, Nishiyama S, Imai D, Yamamura S, Furukawa H, Kawai K, Okada N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:4771. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Katukojvala S, Barlett KN, Lotesta SD, Williams LJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15348. doi: 10.1021/ja044563c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lotesta SD, Hou Y, Williams LJ. Org Lett. 2007;9:869. doi: 10.1021/ol063087n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ghosh P, Lotesta SD, Williams LJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2438. doi: 10.1021/ja068813w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Shangguan N, Kiren S, Williams LJ. Org Lett. 2007;9:1093. doi: 10.1021/ol063143k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Lotesta SD, Kiren S, Williams LJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:7108. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Wang Z, Shangguan N, Cusick JR, Williams LJ. Synlett. 2008;2:213. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y, Cusick JR, Shangguan N, Katukojvala S, Inghrim J, Emge TJ, Williams LJ. J Org Chem. accepted. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.For a review of the electronic effects of silyl groups see: Brook MA. Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry. 1st. Wiley; New York: 2000. pp. 480–510. and references therein.
  • 9.Geometry optimizations were performed using B3LYP/6-31G* and the Gaussian 03 program suite. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA, Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, et al. Gaussian 03, Revision C. 02. Gaussian, Inc.; Wallingford, CT: 2004. (see Supporting Information for full citation). Becke AD. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5648.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys Rev B. 1988;37:785. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785.
  • 10.(a) Crandall JK, Machleder WH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966;48:6037. [Google Scholar]; (b) Crandall JK, Machleder WH. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90:7292. [Google Scholar]; (c) Crandall JK, Machleder WH, Thomas MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1968;90:7346. [Google Scholar]; (d) Crandall JK, Conover WW, Komin JB, Machleder WH. J Org Chem. 1974;39:1723. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Even though methanol was used as solvent no detectable addition of benzamide – or methanol – was observed (entry 1, Table 1). Solvolytic spirodiepoxide opening is known for non-silyl substituted spirodiepoxides; however, silyl-substituted spirodiepoxides do not undergo ring opening in alcohols even upon exposure for several days.
  • 12.Brook AG. Acc Chem Res. 1974;7:77.Moser WH. Tetrahedron. 2001;57:2065. and references therein. Hudrlik PF, Misra RN, Withers GP, Hudrlik AM, Rona RJ, Arcoleo JP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976:1453.Hudrlik PF, Schwartz RH, Kulkarni AK. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979:2233.Hudrlik PF, Nagendrappa G, Kulkarni AK, Hudrlik AM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979:2237.
  • 13.(a) Hudrlik PF, Schwartz RH, Hogan JC. J Org Chem. 1979;44:155. [Google Scholar]; (b) Hudrlik PF, Hudrlik AM, Kulkarni AK. J Am Chem Soc. 1982;104:6809. [Google Scholar]; (c) Simpson GL, Heffron TP, Merino E, Jamison TF. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:1056. doi: 10.1021/ja057973p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Of special note is the work by Marshall, which constitutes the only example of eliminative opening of silyl spirodiepoxides. Marshall JA, Tang Y. J Org Chem. 1993;58:3233.Marshall JA, Tang Y. J Org Chem. 1994;59:1457.
  • 15.Hudrlik PF, Tafesse L, Hudrlik AM. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:11689. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Nugent WA, RajanBabu TV. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:8561. [Google Scholar]; (b) Barrero AF, Oltra JE, Cuerva JM, Rosales A. J Org Chem. 2002;67:2566. doi: 10.1021/jo016277e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Cuerva JM, Justicia J, Oller-López JL, Bazdi B, Oltra JE. Mini-Rev Org Chem. 2006;3:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Other reagents surveyed for the eliminative opening, DBU, Et3N, DIPEA, LDA, NaOH, KOt-Bu, NaOAc, AcOH, HCl, Cy2BCl, PTSA, LiCl and LiClO4, failed to give the desired product or gave inferior results to those shown in the Table.
  • 18.Sakabe N, Goto T, Hirata Y. Tetrahedron. 1977;33:3077. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Available in three steps from commercial reagents. See: Buckle MJC, Fleming I, Gil S, Pang KLC. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:749. doi: 10.1039/b313446f.
  • 20.Garber SB, Kingsbury JS, Gray BL, Hoveyda AH. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122:8168. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kishi Y, Johnson MR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979;20:4347. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES