Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2011 Feb 11;108(6):96. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0096a

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Incorrect Causes of Death

Volker Sartorti *
PMCID: PMC3047723  PMID: 21373281

Problems are repeatedly caused by pressure at the scene from the police or detectives who want the death certificate filled out on the spot. This does not allow one to have another look at a more detailed patient medical file, nor to refer to other colleagues who were involved in treatment either previously or concurrently. This alone, especially in cases where death occurs at an awkward time, must lead to incorrect statements of causes of death and chains of causality. In Schleswig-Holstein, the only permitted entries on the death certificate for manner of death are “yes” or “no” with reference to “indication to suspect unnatural event”—“unexplained” is not an option—so one has to commit oneself to an opinion. If you check the “unnatural” box, e.g., postoperatively or immediately after discharge from hospital, you are regularly put under strong pressure to reconsider this.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that no conflict of interest exists according to the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

References

  • 1.Madea B, Rothschild M. The post mortem examination—determination of the cause and manner of death. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(33):575–588. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES