Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics Clin Appl. 2009 Nov 11;4(1):4–16. doi: 10.1002/prca.200900050

Proteomic examination of Leishmania chagasi plasma membrane proteins: contrast between avirulent and virulent (metacyclic) parasite forms

Chaoqun Yao 1,7,8,*, Yalan Li 5, John E Donelson 2,6, Mary E Wilson 1,3,4,6,7
PMCID: PMC3049999  NIHMSID: NIHMS270185  PMID: 21137013

Abstract

Leishmaniasis annually leads to two million new cases with 59 thousand deaths worldwide. Promastigotes of the causative Leishmania spp. develop from procyclic (log) to the highly virulent metacyclic stage within the sand fly vector. We hypothesized that proteins important for promastigote virulence might be uniquely represented in the plasma membrane of metacyclic, but not log, promastigotes. Purified metacyclic promastigotes from stationary phase cultures of Leishmania chagasi were applied to prepare membrane preparations either by surface biotinylation-streptavidin affinity separation or by octyl glucoside detergent extraction. These membrane fractions were enriched over 130 and 250 fold, respectively, estimated by western blotting for the plasma membrane marker MSP. A total of 447 or 33 proteins were identified by surface biotinylation or detergent extraction, respectively, by LC-MS/MS. Confocal microscopy suggested the difference between the lists was due to the fact that proteins localized both on the surface membrane and within the flagellar pocket were accessible to surface biotinylation. Using detergent extraction, we found different proteins were present in membrane proteins of logarithmic stage compared to metacyclic stage promastigotes. Several dozens were stage specific. These data provide a foundation for identifying virulence factors in the plasma membranes of Leishmania spp. promastigotes during metacyclogenesis.

Keywords: Leishmania, metacyclic promastigotes, plasma membrane proteins, proteomics

Introduction

The digenetic Leishmania spp. protozoa shuttle between a sand fly vector, where they exist as flagellated promastigotes, and a mammalian host, in which they survive as non-flagellated amastigotes. Aflagellate intracellular amastigotes ingested by the sand fly during its blood meal transform to flagellated procyclic promastigotes in the midgut of the sand fly. Procyclic promastigotes transform through the nectomonad, leptomonad and haptomonad stages and eventually develop to metacyclic promastigotes, in a developmental process that is called metacyclogenesis [1]. Some aspects of metacyclogenesis can be approximated in vitro during growth of promastigotes in liquid cell culture [2, 3]. Methods to purify culture-derived metacyclic-like promastigotes have been developed for Leishmania major [4], L. donovani [5] and L. chagasi [6]. Metacyclic promastigotes appear in large numbers behind the stomodeal valve of the sand fly and migrate freely, resulting in some organisms moving anteriorly to the foregut and mouth parts. From here the promastigotes are inoculated into a pool of blood in the skin of humans and other mammals when the fly takes another blood meal. Metacyclic promastigotes are then phagocytosed by host macrophages and transform into aflagellate amastigotes [7, 8].

During metacyclogenesis, promastigote virulence for experimental mammalian models increases significantly. The expression of a number of surface-exposed virulence factors is increased during metacyclogenesis, including lipophosphoglycan [911], major surface protease (MSP, also called GP63), and GP46 (also called promastigote surface antigen protein 2) [12, 13]. The goal of the current study was to use the tools of proteomics to contrast between avirulent and virulent promastigotes and thereby identify as yet unrecognized potential virulence factors amongst the plasma membrane proteins of Leishmania spp. metacyclic promastigotes. We identified dramatically different numbers of proteins with different protocols to prepare membrane-associated proteins, differences that were attributable to whether or not proteins from the flagellar pocket were included in the preparation. Using the more stringent method, which identified only surface and microsomal membrane proteins, we found that several dozen proteins were specific to promastigotes in either their logarithmic or their metacyclic stages of growth. This study provides a solid foundation for further investigation of virulence factors in these trypanosomatid protozoa.

Materials and Methods

Parasites

The Brazilian strain MHOM/BR/00/1669 of L. chagasi, originating from a patient with visceral leishmaniasis [14], was continuously passaged by intracardiac injection of amastigotes in golden hamsters to maintain virulence. Amastigotes were isolated from the spleens of infected hamsters and transformed to promastigotes at 26°C in hemoflagellate-modified minimal essential medium (HOMEM; reagents from GIBCO, Rockville, MO) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. Promastigote cultures were started at a density of 1 × 106 cell/ml at day 0 of cultivation using virulent promastigotes within five passages. Metacyclic promastigotes were isolated to homogeneity from day 8 stationary cultures by a discontinuous Ficoll gradient as previously described [4, 6].

Plasma-membrane protein isolation

Two protocols to isolate promastigote surface membrane proteins were compared. (1) Surface biotinylation. Metacyclic promastigotes were surface biotinylated by incubation at room temperature (RT) for 1 h in 1 mM Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS, GIBCO) as described [15, 16]. Subsequent steps were all performed at 4°C. The surface biotinylated metacyclic promastigotes were lysed by agitation in 2% NP-40/HBSS for 16 h. More than 95% lysis was consistently achieved, according microscopic monitoring. The lysates were subjected to two sequential centrifugation steps at 3,000 and 10,000 ×g (10 min each). The resultant supernatants were agitated with streptavidin agarose beads (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for a minimum of 1 h. The biotinylated proteins were collected and washed twice in 0.5% Triton X-100 in TBS (10 mM Tris/HCl, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and twice in TBS by centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 1 min. Proteins were released from the agarose beads by heating at 100°C for 5 min in SDS-PAGE sample buffer with β-mercaptoethanol (βME) as a reducing reagent to break disulfide bonds bridging the labeled proteins and biotin [15, 16]. For 2DE, the beads were incubated in an IEF lysis buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 5% βME and 6% ampholytes with non-ionic detergent 2% NP-40, 4% CHAPS or 1% ASB-14 [17].

(2) Freeze thaw in hypotonic buffer. As an alternative approach to collecting membrane-enriched fractions, metacyclic or procyclic promastigotes were lysed by incubation in a hypotonic buffer (1 mM K acetate, 1.5 mM Mg acetate, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.2) on ice with DNase/RNase and protease inhibitor cocktails (Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ) at 4°C for 30 min, followed by five cycles of freezing in −80°C and thawing in a RT water bath. Cell lysis was microscopically monitored, and more than 90% cell lysis was consistently achieved. After removal of non-lysed cells from total cell lysates by 1,000 ×g centrifugation (6 min, 4°C), samples were subjected to 100,000 ×g centrifugation (1 h, 4°C) and the pellets containing both microsomes and membranes were collected. Pellets were resuspended in 2% octyl glucoside (Sigma) in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5 with DNase/RNase followed by incubation on ice for 20 min. Membrane proteins were recovered from the supernatants of 178,000 ×g centrifugation (20 min, 4°C) [18, 19], and boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer with βME and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Some preparations of membrane proteins were precipitated with 10% TCA, and directly subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis.

Electrophoresis and western blots

Proteins for IEF were solubilized in 300 µl of IEF lysis buffer and applied directly to rehydrated 11 cm gel strips of Immobiline™ DryStrip pH 3–10 (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) for 16 h at RT. The strips were subjected to 50,000 V-hours for IEF at 20°C. SDS-PAGE was carried out on 5–15% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins in SDS-PAGE gels were either directly visualized by silver staining following the manufacturer’s protocol (SilverQuest Silver Staining Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), or were blotted onto nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuell BioSciences, Keene, NH) followed by western blotting. Filters were alternately incubated with sheep polyclonal antiserum (1:10,000 dilution) directed against purified L. chagasi MSP [19], goat polyclonal antiserum (1:5,000 dilution) against recombinant P36, a cytosolic protein of Leishmania spp. [6, 20], rabbit polyclonal antibody to ER luminal protein BiP (1:1,000 dilution, kindly provided by Dr. J. Bangs of the University of Wisconsin), and a monoclonal antibody against α-tubulin (AB-1, 0.1 µg/ml, Oncogene, San Diego, CA). Peroxidase conjugated anti-sheep and anti-goat antisera were purchased from Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MA), whereas anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antisera were from CalBioChem, and Bio-Rad Laboratories (Richmond, CA), respectively. All secondary antibodies were used at a 1:10,000 dilution.

LC-MS/MS

Gel slices from silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels were incubated in destain solution (Invitrogen SilverQuest Silver Staining Kit), followed by rehydration in water. The gel slices were washed once each in 25 mM NH4HCO3 and 50% ACN dissolved in 25 mM NH4HCO3. Dried gels were sequentially treated in 10 mM DTT for one hour at 56°C, and 55 mM iodoacetamide at RT in the dark with occasional agitation for 45 min for reduction and alkylation, respectively. After another round of rehydration and dehydration followed by complete drying, gels were rehydrated in appropriate volumes of 8 ng/µl sequencing-grade trypsin solution (Promega, Madison, WI) on ice for 10 min, followed by incubation at 37°C for 16 h.

Tryptic peptides were extracted from gels by sonication and incubation in 50% ACN with 0.1% formic acid. This was repeated once and the supernatants were combined. The supernatant volumes were reduced by Speedvac. The samples along with the washes in a total volume of 15 µl were then transferred to 200 µl inserts and 3 µl of each sample were injected into a Thermo Scientific LTQ XL linear ion trap mass spectrometer equipped with ETD and Eksigent NanoLC-1D using a C18 column (75 µm × 10 cm, New Objective, Woburn, MA). Flow rates were set at 200 nl/min with standard gradients composed of mixtures of ACN and water with 0.1% formic acid. A data-dependent MS survey scan between 400 and 2000 was performed followed by 10 MS/MS scans to detect the 10 most abundant ions with CID. Mass dynamic exclusion was applied.

For protein identification, LC-MS/MS data were searched against a database using the SEQUEST algorithm of BioWorks 3.3.1 software (Thermo Fisher scientific Inc., San Jose, CA). The database was created using a local computer on August 2007 by downloading 24,750 entries deposited in GenBank and the published genomes containing the key words Leishmania, Trypanosoma or trypanosomatid. The published genomes of trypanosomatids include L. major, L. infantum, L. braziliensis, Trypanosoma brucei and T. cruzi [2124]. The search parameters were: enzyme specificity considered, trypsin (KR), fully enzymatic cleavage at both ends; number of missed cleavages permitted, 1; fixed modifications including residue specificity, 1 PTM per peptide at cysteine for carboxyamidomethylation; no variable modifications; mass tolerance for precursor ions, 1 AMU; mass tolerance for fragment ion, 1 AMU. The final filter parameters were: 0.100 for Delta CN; and 1.90 (+1), 2.70 (+2), and 3.5 (+3) for Xcorr charge state of each peptide. For each positively identified protein, a minimum of two individual peptides had to satisfy these criteria with a protein score cutoff at e−6. Each protein was checked for a transmembrane domain (TMD) and a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor using TMpred-Prediction of Transmembrane Regions and Orientation (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html), and big-PI Predictor GPI Modification Site Prediction (http://mendel.imp.ac.at/gpi/gpi_server.html), respectively. The defaulted parameters were used during the search processes.

Confocal microscopy

Surface-biotinylated metacyclic promastigotes, or non-biotinylated control promastigotes, were fixed in 10% PBS-buffered formalin for 16 h. Permeabilized cells were incubated in 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS, whereas non-permeabilized cells were incubated in PBS alone. After blocking in 10% goat serum/PBS, cells were incubated in 1:200 diluted FITC-conjugated extravidin (Sigma) in blocking solution. The cells were suspended in VECTASHIELD® mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and examined using a Zeiss 510 confocal microscope (Thornwood, NY). Z-series images were recorded for 0.3 µm thick slices.

Results

Plasma membrane proteins of metacyclic promastigotes isolated by surface biotinylation-streptavidin affinity purification

Metacyclic promastigotes were isolated from stationary phase promastigotes according to density, using our published modification of a method developed for L. major. The method yields a > 95% pure metacyclic population of the cells [4, 6]. Surface biotinylation-streptavidin affinity purification yielded a preparation of the exposed proteins available for surface biotinylation in live metacyclic L. chagasi promastigotes (Figure 1A). The GPI-anchored MSP proteins were used as markers for plasma membrane proteins on western blots, whereas cytoskeletal α-tubulin, cytosolic P36 and the ER luminal protein BiP were used to assess the degree of contamination with non-plasma membrane proteins. As clearly shown in Figure 1A, the abundant MSP proteins were presented in the bead pulldown fraction (lane 4), whereas markers for contaminating cytoskeletal (α-tubulin), cytosol (P36) and organelles (BiP in the endoplasmic reticulum) were below the detectable levels in this lane. In a densitometric analysis no MSP enrichment was found in the lanes 2 and 5. Enrichment indexes calculated from a ratio of cell fractions to the total cell lysates were 0.8, 1.4 and 0.9, respectively, when α-tubulin, P36 and BiP were used as denominators. In contrast, enrichment indexes for lane 4 were 200.4, 208.9 and 251.4, respectively. Furthermore, an average of 134.3 fold enrichment was observed using α-tubulin as the denominator (SD=66.4, n=6). These data suggest that plasma-membrane proteins were substantially separated from cytosol, cytoskeleton and internal organelles in the parasite cell by biotin-avidin affinity purification.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Identification of plasma membrane proteins by biotin-avidin affinity purification and LC-MS/MS. A. A flow chart of surface biotinylation and streptavidin isolation of plasma membrane proteins (top panel), and western blots showing the abundances of the major surface proteases (MSP) and cleanness of the preparation (lane 4) without detectable contaminants of cytoskeletal α-tubulin (α-T), cytosolic protein 36 (P36) and the luminal protein BiP of the endoplasmic reticulum. B. Numbers of protein identified (vertical bars) and the average molecular sizes in kDa (solid line) from each gel slice by LC-MS/MS. The 40 gel slices were generated from a silver-stained 5–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gel strip loaded with the plasma-membrane proteins (Same as lane 4 in A) of 2 × 109 cell equivalence.

Surface biotinylated parasite proteins were separated on 5–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gels and detected by silver staining. No discrete bands could be visualized, an observation that is not unusual for amphipathic membrane proteins. A representative gel was sliced into 40 segments covering the entire lane from top to bottom. After in-gel trypsin digestion and elution followed by LC-MS/MS, up to several dozen proteins were detected in each gel slice. There was good correlation between protein sizes and electrophoretic mobility (Figure 1B). Surprisingly, a total of 447 proteins were detected throughout the 40 gel slices (supplemental Table 1). Similar protein preparations were also subjected to 2DE, which separates proteins sequentially by pI and molecular size. Three different non-ionic detergents, NP-40, CHAPS, and ASB-14, were individually used in the first dimension to enhance protein solubility during IEF. Hundreds of proteins were revealed by silver staining. The resolution capacity of the detergents, listed from the best to worst, was NP-40, CHAPS, and ASB-14 (data not shown).

Peptide coverage of the 447 proteins identified by LC-MS/MS was as follows. One-sixth were identified by peptides covering less than 5% of the amino acid residues of the corresponding proteins, one third had 5–10% coverage, and the remainder had more than 10% of the protein covered by peptides, amongst which a few had more than 40% coverage (Figure 2A). In the trypanosomatid protozoa including Leishmania spp., many plasma membrane proteins are attached to the parasite surface via a GPI anchor. Others are attached via a TMD or through binding to other membrane-associated molecules. Thus, we further analyzed these 447 proteins for a GPI anchor and a TMD using bioinformatics (see Materials and Methods). Five proteins were found to have a signal for GPI anchor addition, all of which were different MSP proteins. This is consistent with published experimental data indicating that most MSPs possess GPI anchors [13]. More than two-thirds of the 447 proteins were predicted to have at least one TMD with 22 proteins having more than 5 TMDs (Figure 2B and supplemental Table 1). The remaining one-third were not predicted to have a TMD. Although the lack of a predicted TMD does not eliminate a protein from being a plasma membrane protein, these data led us to suspect that the method identified more proteins than those merely associated with the plasma membrane. We chose a microscopic approach to investigate this possibility, described below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Percentage coverage (% amino acid) (A) and number of predicted transmembrane domains (TMD) and GPI anchors (B) of the 447 proteins detected using surface biotinylation-streptavidin affinity purification and LC-MS/MS.

Proteins in the flagellar pockets were readily surface biotinylated

To examine why so many proteins were included in surface biotinylated fractions we queried which proteins in live promastigotes were accessible to surface biotinylation. We approached this question using confocal microscopy. Surface biotinylated metacyclic promastigotes showed identical staining patterns whether permeabilized or not (Figure 3). As expected, the surface of the cell body and flagellum stained with FITC-avidin with no appreciable intracellular staining. However, staining was stronger in the flagellar pocket than at the cell surface. In contrast, there was no FITC staining of non-biotinylated controls. The flagellar pocket is a unique organelle found in all Trypanosomatid protozoa, that is formed by the invagination of the plasma membrane at the base of flagellum. The flagellar pocket is the sole site of endocytosis and exocytosis in these protozoa. The confocal images show that proteins in the flagellar pocket of trypanosomatids were readily accessible to the membrane-impermeable biotinylation reagents. This provides an explanation for why so many proteins were isolated by surface biotinylation. We surmise that many of the proteins listed in Supplemental Table 1 likely represent proteins in the flagellar pocket trafficking through endocytic/exocytic pathways.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Proteins in the flagellar pockets of metacyclic promastigotes are accessible to surface biotinylation. Metacyclic promastigotes were surface biotinylated in 1 mM Sulfo-NHS-biotin/HBSS (Panels a and b) or in HBSS alone (Panels c-c’ and d-d’), followed by fixation in 10% PBS-buffered formalin. Afterwards, the cells were incubated in 0.2% Triton X-100 (+Tx)/PBS or in PBS alone (−Tx). Cells were then incubated in FITC-conjugated extravidin and observed by confocal microscopy at 0.3 µm for z-section. Panels a and b shown stacked z-sections generated by the open access ImageJ software (rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). Biotinylated flagellar pockets are marked by arrows. No background staining is observed from non-biotinylated cells (c and d) with DIC (c’ and d’) to show the cells.

Membrane proteins isolated by octyl glucoside extraction

Because the above data indicate that proteins identified through surface biotinylation and LC-MS/MS included protein contents of the flagellar pocket, an alternative approach to isolate membrane proteins was employed. Membranes were isolated by high speed centrifugation from the whole cellular lysates of metacyclic promastigotes. Afterwards, membrane-associated proteins were extracted with the detergent octyl glucoside, which has the advantage that its low critical micelle concentration allows its removal from membrane protein preparations by dialysis [14, 18, 19]. Both P36 and BiP were found in the non-membranous fractions (Figure 4A, lane 3). MSP proteins were mostly found in the membrane fraction (lanes 4–5). After extraction with octyl glucoside, membrane fractions contained no detectable contaminants from cytosolic (P36) or ER (BiP) proteins (Figure 4A, lane 5). By densitometric analysis, an enrichment index for this lane was 253.0 (SD=3.7, n=4) and 286.3 (SD=17.3) when P36 and BiP were used as the denominator, respectively. These data demonstrated that highly enriched preparations of membrane proteins were achieved. Membrane proteins were also visualized by silver staining. A smear appeared at the top of the gel covering the protein sizes of 70–150 kDa and three additional bands were observed at 63, 40 and 22 kDa (Figure 4B). In 40 gel slices spanning the entire lane and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis following trypsin digestion, 33 proteins were identified (supplemental Table 2), of which sixteen were also isolated by surface biotinylation (Table 1, Figure 5). Among these were 5 MSPs, four of which are predicted to have a GPI anchor.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A. Isolation of membrane proteins by detergent octyl glucoside extraction. Flow chart (top panel), and western blots showing abundance of MSP and cleanness of the preparation (lane 5) without detectable contaminants of P36 and BiP. B. Silver-stained gel strip loaded with plasma-membrane proteins (same as lane 5 in A). 2 × 109 cell equivalence was loaded onto a 5–15% gradient SDS-PAGE gel. Forty gel slices were excised from the lane and subjected to LC-MS/MS for protein identification. Locations of standard marker proteins in kDa are shown on the right.

Table 1.

Common proteins identified by LC-MS/MS in the membrane fractions prepared by live cell biotinylation or octyl glucoside extraction.

FUNCTION ACCESSION Da pI TMD %AA Peptides
found
Alpha tubulin A4H727 53521.4 5.03 1 22.06 7
Beta tubulin P21148 50020.8 4.57 2 24.49 8
CPC cysteine peptidase A4I4D6 36995.8 5.10 3 20.00 5
Cytoskeleton-associated protein
CAP5.5
A4I6E4 79917.3 5.39 1 11.33 7
Enolase A4HW62 46008.1 5.20 1 41.19 12
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase A4ICK8 40694.6 8.68 1 18.60 6
MSP# P23223 62911.0 6.42 4 5.76 2
MSP# Q27673 63013.1 6.91 2 3.93 3
MSP# A4HUF6 63517.4 6.96 5 15.05 6
MSP# P15706 63808.6 6.83 4 37.40 21
MSP A4I3D1 60546.0 7.41 4 15.34 6
Nucleoside diphosphate kinase Q9GP00 16614.5 8.18 1 59.60 8
Proteasome alpha 1 subunit A4HP20 29725.7 5.04 0 15.09 3
Proteasome alpha 7 subunit A4H9T4 34861.8 7.39 0 14.61 3
Vacuolar ATP synthase catalytic
subunit a
A4IAD4 67676.0 4.97 2 3.77 2
Vacuolar ATP synthase catalytic
subunit a
A4HB86 67370.9 5.06 2 8.85 4
#

Predicted to have a GPI anchor

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Plasma membrane proteins detected by LC-MS/MS in the samples prepared by methods of biotin-avidin affinity purification and detergent extraction. A total of 447 and 33 proteins were identified, respectively. Of these, only 16 proteins were found in samples prepared by both methods.

Differential expression of plasma membrane proteins during metacyclogenesis

Metacyclogenesis refers to the process through which noninfectious procyclic promastigotes develop into the infectious metacyclic promastigotes in the sand fly vector [2, 3]. We hypothesized that plasma membrane proteins expressed uniquely by metacyclic promastigotes represent potentially important virulence factors. Membrane proteins were isolated by octyl glucoside extraction of either metacyclic or logarithmic growth phase promastigotes; the latter contain a low content of virulent metacyclic parasites. These proteins were subjected to either denaturing and reducing by heating to 100°C in SDS-PAGE sample buffer prior to trypsin digestion, or directly subjected to trypsin digestion followed by LC-MS/MS. Both types of samples yielded similar proteomic results in multiple preparations. Even though the membrane preparations were achieved by the same approach of octyl glucoside extraction, 33 proteins were identified in gel slices from protein preparations that were separated by SDS-PAGE and excised. In contrast, 60 proteins were identified from the samples that were directly subjected to LC-MS/MS with no prior separation step. With the first approach, it is possible that some proteins were lost between gel slices, and/or that some proteins were left in the gel matrix. As showed in Table 2, 60 and 82 proteins were identified in the membrane of the metacyclic and logarithmic growth phase promastigotes, respectively. Among these, 36 and 58 were stage specific, and only 24 proteins were expressed in both stages.

Table 2.

Differential expression of plasma membrane proteins in logarithmic (Log) versus metacyclic (Meta) promastigotes of L. chagasi.

FUNCTION ACCESSION Da pI TMD Log
(AA%)
Meta
(AA%)
Peptides
found
ADP,ATP carrier protein
1, mitochondrial precursor
A4H9X7 35545.00 10.05 5 4.98 9.35 2
Alpha tubulin A4H727 53521.40 5.03 1 6.39 10.10 4
Beta tubulin P21148 50020.80 4.57 2 7.19 6.53 3
Enolase A4HW62 46008.10 5.20 1 7.46 3.77 2
Gim5A protein, putative;
glycosomal membrane
A4HN41 24812.8 8.51 3 11.56 12.44 2
Histone H4 A4HSP4 11418.20 10.89 0 18.00 18.00 2
Kinesin A4I0A6 75199.00 9.84 1 5.03 3.81 3
Kinetoplastid membrane
protein 11B
Q25297 11170.40 6.25 0 46.74 27.17 5
Lanosterol 14-alpha-
demethylase
A2TEF2 54119.70 7.62 3 6.46 6.46 2
MSP# P15706 63808.60 6.83 4 5.34 6.84 4
Paraflagellar rod
component
A4HU55 68098.33 5.09 1 4.79 7.60 4
Paraflagellar rod protein
1D
A4HIY0 69219.20 5.29 0 17.48 21.01 15
Paraflagellar rod protein
2C
A4HX39 68860.50 5.28 0 8.51 15.53 9
Paraflagellar rod protein
2C
A4H8S1 68544.30 5.35 0 8.85 9.02 5
Putative A4H8W1 36235.20 5.87 1 8.83 6.94 2
Putative A4HYD4 41395.10 4.88 1 9.70 9.43 3
Putative A4HZV8 49801.80 5.49 0 22.78 5.69 8
Putative A4I0B5 62548.10 6.59 3 14.21 8.45 7
Putative A4I0F1 14558.30 4.07 0 24.43 24.43 2
Putative A4IDT7 71114.90 5.63 1 7.52 5.76 5
Soluble n-ethylmaleimide
sensitive factor
A4HYZ8 32034.60 4.99 0 14.89 9.57 4
Ubiquitin Q05550 8544.60 7.58 0 32.89 44.74 2
Vacuolar ATPase subunit-
like protein
A4H4F9 41620.60 4.89 0 13.45 7.00 4
Vacuolar ATPase subunit-
like protein
A4HSN6 41528.50 4.70 0 13.45 5.04 4
19S proteasome regulatory
subunit
A4HBS3 54334.20 6.01 0 5.49 2
22 kDa potentially
aggravating protein
papLe22
Q9NJS2 22098.40 9.32 3 6.60 2
Acyl carrier protein A4HFE7 16705.60 5.93 0 21.33 2
ATP-dependent RNA
helicase
A4HMX7 94335.70 6.13 1 5.47 4
Calmodulin Q25420 15481.50 4.09 0 24.29 2
Cytochrome b5-like A4H5X6 13146.60 4.70 1 24.79 2
Cytochrome C oxidase
subunit VI
A4HZH7 19241.30 7.96 0 19.75 2
DNAJ domain protein A4I0P2 88800.40 5.93 4 4.16 2
Dynein arm light chain A4I0S3 27254.10 5.63 0 10.13 2
Eukaryotic translation
initiation factor
A4HGT5 46318.30 4.92 1 21.48 6
Gim5A protein A4IBQ9 24783.70 8.63 3 12.44 2
Heat shock protein Q4QDQ2 91746.30 5.02 1 3.52 2
Heat shock protein 83 P27890 52658.60 5.54 0 7.08 3
Heat shock protein 83-1 A4HL69 41393.60 4.80 0 6.96 2
Heat shock protein 83 P27741 80534.30 4.85 1 5.28 3
Long chain fatty Acyl
CoA synthetase
A4HRT4 78855.60 7.63 3 3.84 2
Methionyl-tRNA
synthetase
A4HZ82 84145.70 5.63 1 3.61 2
n-Acyl-L-amino acid
amidohydrolase
A4HZ04 42737.60 5.02 2 7.34 2
Phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase
Q18L02 51912.10 5.74 4 6.89 2
Poly(a)-binding protein A4HDV5 62023.60 9.42 0 3.62 2
Probable citrate synthase A4HXU4 52159.60 7.89 2 7.02 2
Probable proton ATPase
1A
P11718 107410.60 5.29 9 6.98 6
Proteasome activator
protein pa26
A4IAX3 23945.40 5.23 0 18.39 3
Proteasome alpha 7
subunit
A4H9T4 34861.80 7.39 0 7.14 2
Pteridine transporter ft3 A4HUE7 76188.40 6.10 14 4.43 2
Pteridine transporter ft6 A4HUE5 76005.20 5.63 14 1.88 2
Putative A4H5E9 39862.50 6.41 0 7.02 3
Putative A4H6H3 53945.60 8.43 4 6.22 3
Putative A4H9P7 26979.60 7.33 0 10.64 2
Putative A4HKK8 26364.00 5.46 0 11.64 2
Putative A4HM53 14448.20 10.06 1 26.89 4
Putative A4HQC5 84125.60 5.57 2 2.92 2
Putative A4HTP3 42020.60 7.28 1 6.30 2
Putative A4HTX5 93405.40 8.82 4 2.83 2
Putative A4HWV0 36798.80 7.02 0 7.93 2
Putative A4HXA8 36292.30 5.64 1 17.03 5
Putative A4HZ55 11111.80 4.81 1 11.46 2
Putative A4I0T3 13296.80 6.52 1 19.13 2
Putative A4I1A0 11161.60 9.20 0 24.24 2
Putative A4I1Q2 43111.40 6.44 3 9.14 2
Putative A4I465 46343.40 5.84 2 15.88 5
Putative A4I535 56359.60 4.82 0 36.48 12
Putative A4I551 56465.1.0 8.08 0 5.34 2
Putative A4I683 36279.50 6.32 5 7.78 2
Putative A4I6L1 93786.00 8.92 6 2.38 2
Putative A4I8B0 32807.20 4.92 1 11.00 2
Putative A4IAY6 17953.00 7.24 0 16.97 2
Putative A4IDM5 17414.60 8.55 0 24.38 3
Putative A4IDN1 114046.50 7.16 7 2.18 2
Putative A4IDT2 103400.70 6.83 4 3.01 2
Radial spoke protein 3 A4HFH8 42091.30 6.62 0 7.84 2
Ribonucleoprotein p18,
mitochondrial precursor
A4HWC9 21275.50 6.93 0 16.58 3
Ribonucleoprotein p18,
mitochondrial precursor
A4HWD0 21305.50 6.93 0 8.56 2
Stress-induced protein sti1 A4H5F0 62414.10 6.11 0 6.22 3
Stress-induced protein sti1 A4HTP4 62201.10 5.84 0 5.13 2
Translation elongation
factor 1-beta
A4I9P1 25920.50 5.00 0 12.13 2
Vacuolar-type proton
translocating
pyrophosphatase 1
A4HJA5 83592.20 4.86 16 5.36 3
Zinc transporter-like
protein
A4I745 48193.60 5.92 7 5.10 2
Adenylate nucleotide
translocase
A7LBL5 36215.2 9.82 5 5.52 2
Calpain-like cysteine
peptidase
A4HYX4 14987.30 5.18 0 16.03 2
CPC cysteine peptidase A4I4D6 36995.8 5.10 3 20.00 5
Cysteine protease Q8WT30 37009.8 5.10 3 15.88 4
Cytochrome C oxidase
subunit VI
A4HD57 22258.30 6.24 0 14.80 2
Cytoskeleton-associated
protein CAP5.5
A4I6E4 79917.3 5.39 1 7.87 4
Dehydrogenase-like
protein
A4HUB6 44901.5 8.38 3 6.55 2
Enolase A4H7T5 53692.20 7.89 3 6.81 2
Flagellar glycoprotein-like
protein
A4HUH5 62330.0 7.66 5 6.24 3
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate
aldolase
A4ICK8 40694.6 8.68 1 7.01 2
Glycosomal membrane
protein
A4I3V7 23759.8 10.25 2 13.96 2
Membrane-bound acid
phosphatase precursor
A4ICG3 57288.5 7.67 3 5.45 3
MSP# A4HUF6 63517.4 6.96 5 7.02 3
MSP# P23223 62911.0 6.42 4 4.24 2
MSP# Q27673 63013.1 6.91 2 2.51 2
MSP A4I3D1 60546.0 7.41 4 15.34 5
Paraflagellar rod protein
1D
A4I4N5 69017.00 5.17 0 5.71 4
Proteasome alpha 1
subunit
A4HP20 29725.7 5.04 0 10.57 2
Proteasome alpha 7
subunit
A4H9T4 34861.8 7.39 0 7.14 2
Putative A4H5E1 63469.70 4.58 2 3.51 2
Putative A4HRM8 72826.10 5.40 2 3.33 2
Putative A4HUH4 81190.5 5.94 9 2.91 2
Putative A4I077 14107.10 7.84 0 17.80 2
Putative A4I0D6 57285.50 7.76 3 5.88 2
Putative A4I4S8 155409.8 5.24 10 3.48 4
Putative A4I6U4 31523.70 8.19 0 9.93 2
Putative A4I7J1 140540.3 5.01 6 4.22 5
Putative A4I9W1 37830.4 7.75 3 15.34 4
Putative A4IBR6 71206.1 6.39 5 3.84 2
Reiske iron-sulfur protein
precursor
A4HMH5 33752.8 6.15 2 8.42 2
Reticulon domain protein Q4Q737 22145.70 9.79 3 14.21 2
Surface Antigen Protein 2# A4HV45 43941.8 5.31 3 5.04 2
Vacuolar ATP synthase
catalytic subunit a
A4HB86 67370.9 5.06 2 3.93 2
Vacuolar ATP synthase
catalytic subunit a
A4IAD4 67676.0 4.97 2 3.77 2
Vacuolar proton
translocating ATPase
subunit A
A4I0M2 87674.00 4.92 7 4.26 2
Vesicle-associated
membrane protein
A4H570 24223.40 8.24 1 11.63 2
#

Predicted to have a GPI anchor

Discussion

The plasma membrane of protozoan parasites is a unique cell structure that plays vital roles in maintaining cellular integrity and in facilitating parasite interactions with its different environments. The goal of this study was to characterize plasma membrane proteins uniquely expressed in virulent metacyclic L. chagasi promastigotes. We hypothesize that these proteins might play important roles in parasite virulence.

Recent advances in technology have led to the capacity to both quantitative and qualitative proteomics in samples ranging from organs, tissues and cells to subcellular organelles [2530]. We used the same approach to identify plasma membrane proteins of Leishmania promastigotes. Two approaches were attempted to isolate plasma membrane molecules. First, we used avidin affinity purification of proteins that were biotinylated on the surface of intact live promastigotes, a method that has been successfully used to isolate plasma membrane proteins from many different cell types [3136]. Western blotting demonstrated more than 130 fold enrichment in MSP proteins, markers for plasma-membrane proteins in these biotinylated membrane preparations (Figure 1).

Second, membrane-enriched cellular fractions were separated by centrifugation and membrane proteins were extracted with the detergent octyl glucoside. MSP proteins were enriched over 250 fold, making this method superior to the biotinylation-streptavadin affinity purification approach (Figure 4). Furthermore, a very large number of proteins (447) were identified by biotinylation of live non-permeabilized metacyclic promastigotes, whereas only 33 were present in detergent extracted samples. Microscopic investigation led to the discovery that the contents of the flagellar pocket were strongly labeled by “surface” biotinylation. We conclude that the detergent extraction method yielded a more accurate view of parasite surface exposed molecules. Therefore, membrane proteins were isolated from, and contrasted between, avirulent logarithmic growth phase and virulent metacyclic promastigotes by octyl glucoside extraction. LC-MS/MS identified 58 and 36 stage-specific membrane proteins, respectively.

Sixteen proteins were identified by both live cell biotinylation and detergent extraction (Table 1). This list included five MSPs, of which four have a GPI membrane anchor [12, 13], and two vacuolar ATP synthases. The latter are transporters localized in the plasma membrane [37]. Enolase was commonly identified by both approaches. Several groups have published data showing that this protein is localized to the plasma membranes of several types of cells including L. mexicana promastigotes, using diverse approaches including biochemistry, genetics, proteomics, cellular fraction, and confocal and immunoelectron microscopy [3842]. Unexpectedly, both cytoskeletal α- and β-tubulin were also commonly found, even though they were below the detectable levels by western blotting. The list also contained the cytoskeleton-associated protein CAP5.5. One plausible explanation is that some cytoskeletal proteins are tightly associated with plasma membrane proteins, and therefore are co-isolated with the latter. This could reflect the extensive subpellicular microtubules in Leishmania closely apposed to the inner surface of the plasma membrane, possible through a link corresponding to the cytoplasmic portion of integral membrane proteins such as P60 in T. brucei [43, 44].

CAP5.5 was one protein identified uniquely in membrane preparations of virulent metacyclic, but not avirulent logarithmic promastigotes (see Table 2). A possible homologue was detected in the membrane skeleton of Crithidia fasciculata [44] but this is the first report of its presence in Leishmania spp. CAP5.5 in T. brucei is both myristoylated and palmitoylated, this type of doubly acylation is exclusively found in membrane associated proteins [45]. Furthermore, acylation has been found as a unique method for protein export in Leishmania spp. [46], indicating it may signal unique trafficking within the parasite cell. Similar to our findings in L. chagasi, CAP5.5 of T. brucei is stage specific, only expressed in procyclic form but not in the long slender and short stumpy blood forms of trypanosomes [45]. This protein might be a virulence factor and marker for metacyclic leishmania promastigotes.

Metacyclogenesis is a vital process in the life cycle of Leishmania spp. Metacyclic promastigotes are highly resistant to complement-mediated lysis, and are capable of evading killing by professional microbicidal macrophages in mammalian hosts. Metacyclogenesis is accompanied by a dramatic thickening of the parasite’s cell coat. An approximately 10 nm thickening occurs during metacyclogenesis in L. braziliensis promastigotes, primarily due to a 2–3 fold increase in the size of the surface lipophosphoglycan [911]. There is incomplete information on the changes to the protein components of the plasma membrane that accompany metacyclogenesis.

Using a proteomic approach we identified several dozen L. chagasi proteins in the membranes of logarithmic growth phase and metacyclic promastigotes, most of which were stage-specific. Notably, several nutrient or proton transporters were uniquely present in the membrane fractions of avirulent logarithmic growth phase promastigotes. These included proton ATPase, pteridine transporter 3 and 6, vacuolar-type proton translocating pyrophophatase 1 and zinc transporter-like protein. Furthermore, four heat shock proteins, two stress-induced proteins and several metabolic enzymes were also found exclusively in these cells. The latter included long-chain fatty acyl CoA synthetase, methionyl-tRNA synthetase, n-acyl-L-amino acid amidohydrolase, phosphoglyconate dehydrogenase, and probable citrate synthase. It is worth recalling that the metacyclic stage does not expend energy to undergo cell division, possibly explaining the presence of these proteins in membrane preparations from actively growing logarithmic cells. In contrast, well-characterized virulence factors including four MSP proteins and one GP46 were exclusively identified in the membranes of metacyclic promastigotes. Additionally, there were 24 and 10 putative proteins identified uniquely in logarithmic and metacyclic promastigotes, respectively. These deserve further investigation to determine their function and roles in pathogenesis as well as their usage as stage-specific markers.

We conclude from our proteomic approach that cellular fractionation and detergent extraction is an efficient means of obtaining enriched plasma membrane fractions. Plasma membrane proteins from logarithmically growing, metabolically active L. chagasi promastigotes contained stage-specific proteins required for nutrient acquisition or proton transport, as well as stress-related proteins and metabolic enzymes. In contrast, some well-characterized virulence factors were detected exclusively in plasma membrane preparations from metacyclic promastigotes. The largely non-overlapping lists of membrane proteins demonstrate the dramatic extent to which plasma membrane proteins undergo stage-specific modifications during developmental changes in the life cycle of the Leishmania spp. parasites.

Supplementary Material

Table 1
Table 2

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Dr. Donald L. Montgomery of the University of Wyoming for critical reviewing the manuscript and Dr. James D. Bangs of the University of Wisconsin for providing the rabbit polyclonal antibody to ER BiP protein. This work was supported by grants AI32135 and AI059451 (JED and MEW), and AI45540 and AI048822 (MEW) from the National Institutes of Health, two Merit Review grants (CY and MEW), an MERP (CY) and a Persian Gulf RFP (MEW) from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, and a start-up package from the University of Wyoming (CY).

Abbreviations

βME

β-mercaptoethanol

GPI

glycosylphosphatidylinositol

HBSS

Hanks’ balanced salt solution

MSP

major surface proteases

RT

room temperature

TMD

transmembrane domain

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Bates PA. Transmission of Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by phlebotomine sand flies. Int. J. Parasitol. 2007;37:1097–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.da Silva R, Sacks DL. Metacyclogenesis is a major determinant of Leishmania promastigote virulence and attenuation. Infect. Immun. 1987;55:2802–2806. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.11.2802-2806.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sacks DL. Metacyclogenesis in Leishmania promastigotes. Exp. Parasitol. 1989;69:100–103. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(89)90176-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Spath GF, Beverley SM. A lipophosphoglycan-independent method for isolation of infective Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by density gradient centrifugation. Exp. Parasitol. 2001;99:97–103. doi: 10.1006/expr.2001.4656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Svensjo E, Batista PR, Brodskyn CI, Silva R, et al. Interplay between parasite cysteine proteases and the host kinin system modulates microvascular leakage and macrophage infection by promastigotes of the Leishmania donovani complex. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:206–220. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yao C, Chen Y, Sudan B, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. Leishmania chagasi: Homogenous metacyclic promastigotes isolated by buoyant density are highly virulent in a mouse model. Exp. Parasitol. 2008;118:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garcia LS. Diagonstic Medical Parasitology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sacks D, Lawyer P, Kamhawi S. In: Leishmania After the Genome. Myler P, Fasel N, editors. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press; 2008. pp. 205–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McConville MJ, Turco SJ, Ferguson MA, Sacks DL. Developmental modification of lipophosphoglycan during the differentiation of Leishmania major promastigotes to an infectious stage. EMBO J. 1992;11:3593–3600. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05443.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pinto-da-Silva LH, Camurate M, Costa KA, Oliveira SM, et al. Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis metacyclic promastigotes purified using Bauhinia purpurea lectin are complement resistant and highly infective for macrophages in vitro and hamsters in vivo. Int. J. Parasitol. 2002;32:1371–1377. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00137-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sacks DL, Pimenta PF, McConville MJ, Schneider P, Turco SJ. Stage-specific binding of Leishmania donovani to the sand fly vector midgut is regulated by conformational changes in the abundant surface lipophosphoglycan. J. Exp. Med. 1995;181:685–697. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.2.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Handman E, Papenfuss AT, Speed TP, Goding JW. In: Leishmania After the Genome. Myler P, Fasel N, editors. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press; 2008. pp. 177–204. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yao C, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. The major surface protease (MSP or GP63) of Leishmania sp. Biosynthesis, regulation of expression, and function. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003;132:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilson ME, Hardin KK. The major concanavalin A-binding surface glycoprotein of Leishmania donovani chagasi promastigotes is involved in attachment to human macrophages. J. Immunol. 1988;141:265–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yao C, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. Internal and surface-localized MSP of Leishmania and their differential release from promastigotes. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007;6:1905–1912. doi: 10.1128/EC.00073-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yao C, Luo J, Hsiao C, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. Internal and surface subpopulations of the major surface protease (MSP) of Leishmania chagasi. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2005;139:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yao C, Luo J, Storlie P, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. Multiple products of the Leishmania chagasi major surface protease (MSP or GP63) gene family. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004;135:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Russell DG, Wilhelm H. The involvement of the major surface glycoprotein (gp63) of Leishmania promastigotes in attachment to macrophages. J. Immunol. 1986;136:2613–2620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wilson ME, Hardin KK, Donelson JE. Expression of the major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania donovani chagasi in virulent and attenuated promastigotes. J. Immunol. 1989;143:678–684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu X, Chang KP. Identification by extrachromosomal amplification and overexpression of a zeta-crystallin/NADPH-oxidoreductase homologue constitutively expressed in Leishmania spp. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1994;66:201–210. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berriman M, Ghedin E, Hertz-Fowler C, Blandin G, et al. The genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Science. 2005;309:416–422. doi: 10.1126/science.1112642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.El-Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Nilsson D, et al. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science. 2005;309:409–415. doi: 10.1126/science.1112631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ivens AC, Peacock CS, Worthey EA, Murphy L, et al. The genome of the kinetoplastid parasite, Leishmania major. Science. 2005;309:436–442. doi: 10.1126/science.1112680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Peacock CS, Seeger K, Harris D, Murphy L, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of three Leishmania species that cause diverse human disease. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:839–847. doi: 10.1038/ng2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Silverman JM, Chan SK, Robinson DP, Dwyer DM, et al. Proteomic analysis of the secretome of Leishmania donovani. Genome Biol. 2008;9:R35. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pshezhetsky AV, Fedjaev M, Ashmarina L, Mazur A, et al. Subcellular proteomics of cell differentiation: Quantitative analysis of the plasma membrane proteome of Caco-2 cells. Proteomics. 2007;7:2201–2215. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clifton JG, Li X, Reutter W, Hixson DC, Josic D. Comparative proteomics of rat liver and Morris hepatoma 7777 plasma membranes. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007;849:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.08.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Berro R, de la Fuente C, Klase Z, Kehn K, et al. Identifying the membrane proteome of HIV-1 latently infected cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:8207–8218. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M606324200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Delvecchio VG, Connolly JP, Alefantis TG, Walz A, et al. Proteomic profiling and identification of immunodominant spore antigens of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:6355–6363. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00455-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xie J, Techritz S, Haebel S, Horn A, et al. A two-dimensional electrophoretic map of human mitochondrial proteins from immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines: a prerequisite to study mitochondrial disorders in patients. Proteomics. 2005;5:2981–2999. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200401191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coonrod SA, Wright PW, Herr JC. Oolemmal proteomics. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002;53:55–65. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(01)00102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jang JH, Hanash S. Profiling of the cell surface proteome. Proteomics. 2003;3:1947–1954. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sabarth N, Lamer S, Zimny-Arndt U, Jungblut PR, et al. Identification of surface proteins of Helicobacter pylori by selective biotinylation, affinity purification, and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:27896–27902. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204473200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shin BK, Wang H, Yim AM, Le Naour F, et al. Global profiling of the cell surface proteome of cancer cells uncovers an abundance of proteins with chaperone function. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:7607–7616. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210455200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang W, Zhou G, Zhao Y, White MA. Affinity enrichment of plasma membrane for proteomics analysis. Electrophoresis. 2003;24:2855–2863. doi: 10.1002/elps.200305569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao Y, Zhang W, Kho Y. Proteomic analysis of integral plasma membrane proteins. Anal. Chem. 2004;76:1817–1823. doi: 10.1021/ac0354037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bridges DJ, Pitt AR, Hanrahan O, Brennan K, et al. Characterisation of the plasma membrane subproteome of bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. Proteomics. 2008;8:83–99. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lopez-Villar E, Monteoliva L, Larsen MR, Sachon E, et al. Genetic and proteomic evidences support the localization of yeast enolase in the cell surface. Proteomics. 2006;(6 Suppl 1):S107–S118. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Miles LA, Dahlberg CM, Plescia J, Felez J, et al. Role of cell-surface lysines in plasminogen binding to cells: identification of alpha-enolase as a candidate plasminogen receptor. Biochemistry. 1991;30:1682–1691. doi: 10.1021/bi00220a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pancholi V. Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001;58:902–920. doi: 10.1007/PL00000910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pancholi V, Fischetti VA. alpha-enolase, a novel strong plasmin(ogen) binding protein on the surface of pathogenic streptococci. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:14503–14515. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.23.14503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Quinones W, Pena P, Domingo-Sananes M, Caceres A, et al. Leishmania mexicana: molecular cloning and characterization of enolase. Exp. Parasitol. 2007;116:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hou WY, Pimenta PF, Shen RL, Da Silva PP. Stereo views and immunogold labeling of the pellicular microtubules at the inner surface of the plasma membrane of Leishmania as revealed by fracture-flip. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1992;40:1309–1318. doi: 10.1177/40.9.1506668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Seebeck T, Kung V, Wyler T, Muller M. A 60-kDa cytoskeletal protein from Trypanosoma brucei brucei can interact with membranes and with microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85:1101–1104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hertz-Fowler C, Ersfeld K, Gull K. CAP5.5, a life-cycle-regulated, cytoskeleton-associated protein is a member of a novel family of calpain-related proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2001;116:25–34. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(01)00296-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Denny PW, Gokool S, Russell DG, Field MC, Smith DF. Acylation-dependent protein export in Leishmania. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:11017–11025. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table 1
Table 2

RESOURCES