Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2010 Dec 4;67(Pt 1):m21–m22. doi: 10.1107/S1600536810049792

Poly[diaqua-μ3-4-nitro­phthalato-copper(II)]

Ming-Lin Guo a,*
PMCID: PMC3050255  PMID: 21522547

Abstract

In the title complex, [Cu(C8H3NO6)(H2O)2]n, the two carboxyl­ate groups of the 4-nitro­phthalate dianion ligands have monodentate and 1,3-bridging bonding modes, respectively. The Cu atom shows an approximate square-pyramidal coordination as it is bonded to O atoms from the carboxyl­ate groups of three 4-nitro­phthalate ligands and two O atoms of the non-equivalent coordinated water mol­ecules. Other Cu atoms in the coordination polymer are connected into a two-dimensional layer in the ab plane. The layers are aggregated to a three-dimensional structure through inter­layer hydrogen bonding involving an O atom of a nitro group. The whole three-dimensional structure is further maintained and stabilized by intra­layer hydrogen bonds between the O atoms of the carboxyl­ate groups and the coordinated water mol­ecules.

Related literature

For τ value calculations in a square-pyramidal environment, see: Addison et al. (1984 ▶). For related structures, see: Baca et al. (2003 ▶, 2004 ▶); Biagini Cingi et al. (1978 ▶); Fu et al. (2006 ▶); Guo & Guo (2007 ▶); Ma et al. (2004 ▶); Wang et al. (2009 ▶); Yang et al. (2003 ▶). For hydrogen bonds, see Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶); Brown (1976 ▶). For a comparison of Cu—O distances, see: Pasan et al. (2007 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-00m21-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C8H3NO6)(H2O)2]

  • M r = 308.69

  • Orthorhombic, Inline graphic

  • a = 14.208 (3) Å

  • b = 6.5159 (13) Å

  • c = 21.722 (4) Å

  • V = 2011.0 (7) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.21 mm−1

  • T = 133 K

  • 0.14 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku Saturn diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku/MSC, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.850, T max = 0.917

  • 11779 measured reflections

  • 1974 independent reflections

  • 1609 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.079

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F 2) = 0.144

  • S = 1.07

  • 1974 reflections

  • 163 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.79 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.66 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL .

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810049792/sj5060sup1.cif

e-67-00m21-sup1.cif (16.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810049792/sj5060Isup2.hkl

e-67-00m21-Isup2.hkl (97.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Cu1—O4i 1.917 (3)
Cu1—O1 1.945 (3)
Cu1—O8 1.991 (3)
Cu1—O7 1.991 (4)
Cu1—O3ii 2.263 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O7—H7A⋯O2iii 0.85 2.19 2.862 (5) 136
O7—H7A⋯O3i 0.85 2.30 2.858 (5) 123
O7—H7B⋯O6iv 0.85 2.15 2.959 (6) 158
O8—H8A⋯O1v 0.85 1.98 2.787 (4) 160
O8—H8B⋯O2ii 0.85 1.85 2.692 (5) 170

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Tianjin Polytechnic University for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Aromatic dicarboxylate ligands such as phthalate (phth) and substituted phthalatehave been used in the construction of polymeric metal complexes because they can act as a bis-monodentate, bis-bidentate and combined modes of coordination to form short bridges via one carboxylato end or long bridges via the benzene ring and lead to a great variety of structures (Biagini Cingi et al., 1978; Guo and Guo, 2007; Wang et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2004; Baca et al., 2003, 2004; Yang et al., 2003; Fu et al., 2006). We have used the 4-nitrophthalate dianion as a ligand, and have obtained the title novel five-coordinate 4-nitrophthalate-copper complex, (I), which forms a three-dimensional supramolecular network through O—H···O hydrogen bonding.

The asymmetric unit in the structure of (I) comprises one Cu atom, one complete 4-nitrophthate dianion and two non-equivalent water molecules, and is shown in Fig. 1 in a symmetry-expanded view, which displays the full coordination of the Cu atom. Selected geometric parameters are given in Table 1.

The Cu atom exhibits an approximate square pyramidal environment (the τ value being 0.171, Addison et al., 1984), with atoms O1, O4i (see Fig. 1 for symmetry codes) of two non-equivalent 4-nitrophthalate dianions and O7 and O8 atoms of coordinated water molecules in a planar arrangement, with the mean Cu–O(eq) bond distance being 1.961 (3) Å, which is comparable to that reported for poly[(µ3-methylmalonato-O,O',O'',O''')-aqua-\ copper(II)] (Pasan, et al., 2007). The apical position is occupied by O3ii atom [Cu1–O3ii = 2.263 (3) Å]. The Cu atom is shifted by 0.0889 (5) A° toward the apical position. There is an additional weak Cu–O2 contact in (I), with a Cu···O distance of 2.821 (3) Å.

In the present structure, monodentate, bidentate 1,3-bridging bonding and 1,6-bridging bonding modes via the benzene ring are present (Fig. 2). The O1 atom binds in a monodentate fashion, while the O3 and O4 atoms display both monodentate and bidentate 1,3-bridge bonding to link two Cu atoms. The O1 and O3 (or O4) atoms adopt a 1,6-bridging bonding mode via the benzene ring to connect with two other Cu atoms.

The Cu atoms are further interconnected by three O atoms from three 4-nitrophthalate dianions into a two-dimensional layer in the ab plane. The mean planes of the carboxylate groups of O1/C1/O2 and the benzene ring make a dihedral angle of 72.4 (5)°, and the value of a dihedral angle for the carboxylate groups of O3/C8/O4 is 14.5 (5)°; the two C—O bond distances (O1—C1 and O2—C1) of the monodentate carboxylate group are 1.278 (5) and 1.241 (5) Å, respectively, and the two C—O bond distances (O3—C4 and O4—C4) of the 1,3-bridging bonding carboxylate group are 1.253 (5) and 1.266 (6) Å, respectively. These indicate that the mesomeric effect for the 1,3-bridging bonding carboxylate group is somewhat greater than that of the monodentate carboxylate group.

The two water molecules within the coordination sphere of the Cu atom, and the nitro group (O5/N1/O6) in the present structure engage in distinct hydrogen bonding interactions (see Table 2). Within each layer, the non-coordinated O2 atom is involved in forming strong O8—H8B···O2ii (Brown, 1976) and weak O7—H7A···O2v hydrogen bonds. These play an important role in the propagation of the two-dimensional layer structure, due to the formation of different hydrogen bonded ring graph set motifs (Bernstein et al., 1995), such as an S(8), and two 10-membered R22(10) motifs (Fig.3). The neighbouring layers are linked together via weak O7—H7B···O6vi hydrogen bonding interactions. These also result in the aryl rings of the 4-nitrophthalato ligands stacking weakly in an offset fashion along the c direction with centroid to centroid distances in the range 4.55 (4)Å - 4.97 (2)%A. Thus, the three-dimensional connectivity of the structure is achieved.

Experimental

Copper(II) oxide (0.32 g 4 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of 4-nitrophthalic acid (0.53 g, 2.5 mmol) in boiling water (20.0 ml) over a period of 40 min. After filtration, slow evaporation over a period of a week at room temperature provided green needle-like crystals of (I).

Refinement

All water H atoms were found in difference Fourier maps. However, during refinement, they were fixed at O–H distances of 0.85 Å, with Uiso(H)=1.2 Ueq(O). The H atoms of C–H groups were treated as riding, with C–H = 0.93 Å and Uiso (H) = 1.2 Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A view of the structure of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme and coordination polyhedra for the Cu atoms; displacement ellipsoids were drawn at the 30% probability level [Symmetry codes: (i) x - 1/2, y, -z + 1/2; (ii) -x + 1, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the packing of (I), viewed down the c axis, showing the two-dimensional layer in the ab plane.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Packing diagram for (I), viewed down the b axis, showing the hydrogen bonding interactions as dashed lines.

Crystal data

[Cu(C8H3NO6)(H2O)2] F(000) = 1240
Mr = 308.69 Dx = 2.039 Mg m−3
Orthorhombic, Pbca Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2ab Cell parameters from 3445 reflections
a = 14.208 (3) Å θ = 2.4–26.0°
b = 6.5159 (13) Å µ = 2.21 mm−1
c = 21.722 (4) Å T = 133 K
V = 2011.0 (7) Å3 Needle, green
Z = 8 0.14 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn diffractometer 1974 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode 1609 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
confocal Rint = 0.079
Detector resolution: 26.033 pixels mm-1 θmax = 26.1°, θmin = 2.4°
ω scans h = −17→15
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku/MSC, 2005) k = −6→8
Tmin = 0.850, Tmax = 0.917 l = −26→26
11779 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.144 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0713P)2 + 4.9336P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1974 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
163 parameters Δρmax = 0.79 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.66 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.35209 (4) 0.13735 (8) 0.24112 (3) 0.0228 (2)
O1 0.4485 (2) 0.1048 (4) 0.30394 (14) 0.0225 (7)
O2 0.4281 (2) 0.4401 (5) 0.31949 (14) 0.0268 (7)
O3 0.6351 (2) 0.2964 (5) 0.27688 (14) 0.0230 (7)
O4 0.7598 (2) 0.1491 (5) 0.32317 (15) 0.0274 (7)
N1 0.6821 (4) 0.1444 (7) 0.5486 (2) 0.0398 (11)
O5 0.7673 (3) 0.0995 (8) 0.5446 (2) 0.0547 (12)
O6 0.6397 (3) 0.1487 (6) 0.59882 (18) 0.0476 (11)
C1 0.4654 (3) 0.2731 (7) 0.33201 (19) 0.0226 (9)
C2 0.5298 (3) 0.2557 (6) 0.3875 (2) 0.0227 (9)
C3 0.4867 (4) 0.2677 (6) 0.4447 (2) 0.0266 (10)
H3 0.4226 0.2964 0.4470 0.032*
C4 0.5373 (4) 0.2375 (7) 0.4982 (2) 0.0295 (11)
H4 0.5086 0.2475 0.5366 0.035*
C5 0.6314 (4) 0.1923 (7) 0.4930 (2) 0.0306 (11)
C6 0.6779 (4) 0.1873 (7) 0.4368 (2) 0.0279 (10)
H6A 0.7423 0.1634 0.4350 0.034*
C7 0.6262 (3) 0.2185 (6) 0.3836 (2) 0.0222 (9)
C8 0.6772 (3) 0.2218 (6) 0.3224 (2) 0.0221 (9)
O7 0.2588 (3) 0.1002 (5) 0.30857 (16) 0.0318 (8)
H7A 0.2064 0.0748 0.2912 0.038*
H7B 0.2764 0.0051 0.3328 0.038*
O8 0.4457 (2) 0.2481 (5) 0.18154 (15) 0.0295 (8)
H8A 0.4672 0.3642 0.1921 0.035*
H8B 0.4877 0.1567 0.1770 0.035*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0185 (4) 0.0227 (3) 0.0271 (4) 0.0010 (2) −0.0029 (2) −0.00199 (19)
O1 0.0210 (17) 0.0233 (14) 0.0230 (14) −0.0003 (13) −0.0020 (13) −0.0017 (11)
O2 0.0226 (18) 0.0240 (16) 0.0338 (17) 0.0017 (14) −0.0012 (14) 0.0013 (13)
O3 0.0189 (17) 0.0227 (15) 0.0274 (16) 0.0001 (13) −0.0008 (13) 0.0015 (12)
O4 0.0188 (18) 0.0333 (17) 0.0301 (17) 0.0047 (14) 0.0015 (14) 0.0047 (13)
N1 0.037 (3) 0.043 (3) 0.039 (3) −0.006 (2) 0.000 (2) −0.0008 (18)
O5 0.035 (3) 0.079 (3) 0.050 (3) 0.007 (2) −0.007 (2) 0.002 (2)
O6 0.052 (3) 0.060 (3) 0.031 (2) −0.009 (2) 0.0032 (19) 0.0028 (17)
C1 0.018 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.024 (2) 0.0005 (19) 0.0035 (18) −0.0016 (16)
C2 0.020 (2) 0.0198 (19) 0.028 (2) −0.0007 (18) 0.0003 (18) −0.0004 (16)
C3 0.026 (3) 0.024 (2) 0.030 (2) 0.000 (2) 0.001 (2) −0.0061 (17)
C4 0.034 (3) 0.028 (2) 0.027 (2) −0.002 (2) 0.001 (2) −0.0028 (17)
C5 0.041 (3) 0.025 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.000 (2) −0.007 (2) −0.0001 (17)
C6 0.023 (3) 0.029 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.002 (2) −0.001 (2) −0.0018 (18)
C7 0.022 (2) 0.019 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.0009 (18) −0.0013 (18) 0.0004 (16)
C8 0.021 (2) 0.018 (2) 0.027 (2) −0.0036 (18) −0.0006 (19) −0.0007 (16)
O7 0.0226 (19) 0.0408 (19) 0.0320 (17) 0.0000 (16) −0.0039 (15) −0.0032 (14)
O8 0.0263 (19) 0.0260 (16) 0.0361 (18) −0.0035 (15) −0.0035 (15) 0.0024 (13)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—O4i 1.917 (3) C2—C7 1.393 (7)
Cu1—O1 1.945 (3) C3—C4 1.382 (7)
Cu1—O8 1.991 (3) C3—H3 0.9300
Cu1—O7 1.991 (4) C4—C5 1.373 (7)
Cu1—O3ii 2.263 (3) C4—H4 0.9300
O1—C1 1.278 (5) C5—C6 1.388 (7)
O2—C1 1.241 (5) C6—C7 1.385 (7)
O3—C8 1.253 (5) C6—H6A 0.9300
O4—C8 1.266 (6) C7—C8 1.514 (6)
N1—O6 1.246 (6) O7—H7A 0.8505
N1—O5 1.249 (7) O7—H7B 0.8505
N1—C5 1.441 (7) O8—H8A 0.8477
C1—C2 1.517 (6) O8—H8B 0.8487
C2—C3 1.387 (6)
O4i—Cu1—O1 175.60 (13) C4—C3—H3 119.5
O4i—Cu1—O8 88.20 (14) C2—C3—H3 119.5
O1—Cu1—O8 91.45 (14) C5—C4—C3 117.9 (4)
O4i—Cu1—O7 94.90 (15) C5—C4—H4 121.1
O1—Cu1—O7 86.53 (14) C3—C4—H4 121.1
O8—Cu1—O7 165.32 (14) C4—C5—C6 122.8 (5)
O4i—Cu1—O3ii 88.18 (12) C4—C5—N1 117.6 (5)
O1—Cu1—O3ii 87.58 (12) C6—C5—N1 119.6 (5)
O8—Cu1—O3ii 100.93 (12) C7—C6—C5 118.6 (5)
O7—Cu1—O3ii 93.51 (13) C7—C6—H6A 120.7
C1—O1—Cu1 112.0 (3) C5—C6—H6A 120.7
C8—O3—Cu1iii 118.6 (3) C6—C7—C2 119.7 (4)
C8—O4—Cu1iv 129.7 (3) C6—C7—C8 118.8 (4)
O6—N1—O5 122.4 (5) C2—C7—C8 121.4 (4)
O6—N1—C5 119.2 (5) O3—C8—O4 126.7 (4)
O5—N1—C5 118.4 (5) O3—C8—C7 118.0 (4)
O2—C1—O1 124.6 (4) O4—C8—C7 115.2 (4)
O2—C1—C2 119.8 (4) Cu1—O7—H7A 106.3
O1—C1—C2 115.4 (4) Cu1—O7—H7B 110.4
C3—C2—C7 119.9 (4) H7A—O7—H7B 113.0
C3—C2—C1 116.1 (4) Cu1—O8—H8A 112.9
C7—C2—C1 123.9 (4) Cu1—O8—H8B 106.9
C4—C3—C2 121.0 (5) H8A—O8—H8B 113.8
O8—Cu1—O1—C1 81.6 (3) O5—N1—C5—C6 0.1 (7)
O7—Cu1—O1—C1 −83.9 (3) C4—C5—C6—C7 −3.5 (7)
O3ii—Cu1—O1—C1 −177.6 (3) N1—C5—C6—C7 175.2 (4)
Cu1—O1—C1—O2 −2.7 (6) C5—C6—C7—C2 0.5 (7)
Cu1—O1—C1—C2 172.0 (3) C5—C6—C7—C8 177.5 (4)
O2—C1—C2—C3 70.4 (5) C3—C2—C7—C6 2.0 (6)
O1—C1—C2—C3 −104.5 (5) C1—C2—C7—C6 −174.3 (4)
O2—C1—C2—C7 −113.1 (5) C3—C2—C7—C8 −174.9 (4)
O1—C1—C2—C7 72.0 (6) C1—C2—C7—C8 8.7 (6)
C7—C2—C3—C4 −1.8 (6) Cu1iii—O3—C8—O4 −90.7 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4 174.8 (4) Cu1iii—O3—C8—C7 88.5 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −1.0 (7) Cu1iv—O4—C8—O3 3.5 (7)
C3—C4—C5—C6 3.7 (7) Cu1iv—O4—C8—C7 −175.7 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N1 −175.0 (4) C6—C7—C8—O3 −163.6 (4)
O6—N1—C5—C4 −1.1 (7) C2—C7—C8—O3 13.3 (6)
O5—N1—C5—C4 178.8 (5) C6—C7—C8—O4 15.7 (6)
O6—N1—C5—C6 −179.8 (5) C2—C7—C8—O4 −167.4 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O7—H7A···O2v 0.85 2.19 2.862 (5) 136
O7—H7A···O3i 0.85 2.30 2.858 (5) 123
O7—H7B···O6vi 0.85 2.15 2.959 (6) 158
O8—H8A···O1iii 0.85 1.98 2.787 (4) 160
O8—H8B···O2ii 0.85 1.85 2.692 (5) 170

Symmetry codes: (v) −x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (i) x−1/2, y, −z+1/2; (vi) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: SJ5060).

References

  1. Addison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349–1356.
  2. Baca, S. G., Filippova, I. G., Gherco, O. A., Gdaniec, M., Simonov, Y. A., Gerbeleu, N. V., Franz, P., Basler, R. & Decurtins, S. (2004). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 357, 3419–3429.
  3. Baca, S. G., Simonov, Y. A., Gdaniec, M., Gerbeleu, N., Filippova, I. G. & Timco, G. A. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, 685–689.
  4. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
  5. Biagini Cingi, M., Manotti Lanfredi, A. M., Tiripicchio, A. & Tiripicchio Camellini, M. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 134–137.
  6. Brown, I. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 24–31.
  7. Fu, X.-C., Wang, X.-Y., Li, M.-T., Wang, C.-G. & Deng, X.-T. (2006). Acta Cryst. C62, m343–m345. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, M.-L. & Guo, C.-H. (2007). Acta Cryst. C63, m595–m597. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Ma, C.-B., Wang, W.-G., Zhang, X.-F., Chen, C.-N., Liu, Q.-T., Zhu, H.-P., Liao, D.-Z. & Li, L.-C. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 3522–3532.
  10. Pasan, J., Sanchiz, J., Lloret, F., Julvec, M. & Ruiz-Perez, C. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 478–487.
  11. Rigaku/MSC (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku/MSC, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, F.-Q., Lu, F.-L., Wei, B. & Zhao, Y.-N. (2009). Acta Cryst. C65, m42–m44. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, S.-Y., Long, L.-S., Huang, R.-B., Zheng, L.-S. & Ng, S. W. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, m507–m509. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810049792/sj5060sup1.cif

e-67-00m21-sup1.cif (16.6KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810049792/sj5060Isup2.hkl

e-67-00m21-Isup2.hkl (97.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES