Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2010 Dec 18;67(Pt 1):m99–m100. doi: 10.1107/S1600536810051962

Dichlorido(η6-p-cymene)(4-fluoro­aniline-κN)ruthenium(II)

Richard E Sykora a, Andrew G Harris a, Jason W Clements a, Norris W Hoffman a,*
PMCID: PMC3050405  PMID: 21522611

Abstract

The title compound, [RuCl2(C10H14)(C6H6FN)], a pseudo-octa­hedral d 6 complex, has the expected piano-stool geometry around the Ru(II) atom. The fluoro­aniline ring forms a dihedral angle of 19.3 (2)° with the p-cymene ring. In the crystal, two mol­ecules form an inversion dimer via a pair of N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds. Weak inter­molecular C—H⋯Cl inter­actions involving the p-cymene ring consolidate the crystal packing.

Related literature

For applications of (η6-p-cymene)Ru(II) dihalides in organic synthesis, see: Boutadla et al. (2010 ▶). For studies of (η6-arene)Ru(II) dihalides in bioinorganic chemistry, see: den Heeten et al. (2010 ▶). For anti-tumor medical applications of (η6-arene)Ru(II) systems, see: Hanif et al. (2010 ▶). For conversion of [(η6-p-cymene)RuCl2]2 with two molar equivalents of neutral unidentate nitro­gen ligands into monomeric pseudo-octa­hedral piano-stool complexes of general formula (η6-p-cymene)Ru(N-ligand)Cl2, see: Burrell & Steedman (1997 ▶); Govindaswamy & Kollipara (2006 ▶); Begley et al. (1991 ▶). For crystal structures of Ni-triad complexes of 4-fluoro­aniline, see: Randell et al. (2006 ▶); Fawcett et al. (2005 ▶); Padmanabhan et al. (1985 ▶). For applications of 19F-NMR reporter moieties in monitoring ligand-substitution equilibria, see: Hoffman et al. (2009 ▶); Carter et al. (2004 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-00m99-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [RuCl2(C10H14)(C6H6FN)]

  • M r = 417.30

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.6492 (9) Å

  • b = 12.2458 (13) Å

  • c = 15.6471 (16) Å

  • β = 93.271 (8)°

  • V = 1654.6 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.27 mm−1

  • T = 290 K

  • 0.26 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

  • Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968 ▶) T min = 0.635, T max = 0.779

  • 3234 measured reflections

  • 3027 independent reflections

  • 2284 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.048

  • 3 standard reflections every 120 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.090

  • S = 1.00

  • 3027 reflections

  • 193 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.57 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3

Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1993 ▶); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC; data reduction: XCAD-4PC (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995) ▶; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810051962/is2638sup1.cif

e-67-00m99-sup1.cif (18.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810051962/is2638Isup2.hkl

e-67-00m99-Isup2.hkl (148.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N1—H1B⋯Cl2i 0.90 2.39 3.225 (3) 154
C6—H6⋯Cl1ii 0.93 2.72 3.384 (4) 129

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Chemistry and the Univeristy Committee for Undergraduate Research at USA for their generous support and the Department of Energy and Oak Ridge National Laboratory for the diffractometer used in this study.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The (η6-p-cymene)ruthenium(II)-dihalide motif has been used extensively for promotion of organic reactions (Boutadla et al., 2010), bioinorganic studies (den Heeten et al., 2010), and anti-tumor medical trials (Hanif et al., 2010). Treating the commercially available dimer, di-µ-chloridobis-[chlorido(p-cymene)ruthenium(II)], with two molar equivalents of many neutral unidentate ligands (L) generates two moles of (η6-p-cymene)Ru(L)Cl2. The structures of several with aniline ligands (2,6-diisopropylphenyl, Burrell & Steedman, 1997; 4-chloro, Govindaswamy & Kollipara, 2006; 4-methyl, Begley, 1991) have been crystallographically determined. Structures of 4-fluoroaniline complexes have been reported for other late d-transition metals [palladium(II), Randell et al., 2006; Padmanabhan et al., 1985; nickel(II), Fawcett et al., 2005].

Our interest in studying relative binding affinities of soft metal centers for ligands of moderate and weak donor power using 19F and 31P NMR spectroscopy (Hoffman et al., 2009; Carter et al., 2004) to monitor ligand-substitution equilibria led us to prepare the title complex. Single crystals were grown from vapor diffusion of heptane into a benzene solution of the 4-fluoroaniline complex. The nitrogen atom in the 4-fluoroaniline ligand is essentially coplanar with its aromatic ring, whose plane is oriented slightly down and away from the plane of the p-cymene ring. Structural parameters were similar to those reported for the other (η6-p-cymene)Ru(4—X—C6H4NH2)Cl2 piano-stool complexes above. The Ru—Cl, Ru—N, and Ru—C distances are quite ordinary. Somewhat greater differences exist between structural parameters of interest in the 4-fluoroaniline complexes of the divalent Pd and Ni moieties, likely because of their dissimilar combinations of dn configurations, coordination geometry, and ligand sets.

Our standard ligand-substitution reaction to determine relative affinities of neutral ligands (L) of moderate and weak donor power for (η6-p-cymene)RuCl2 employs the equilibrium below (eq. 1), where P* is the very sterically hindered triaryl phosphite, P(O-2,4-But2-C6H3)3. Equilibrium constants are measured for different L employing

(η6-p-cymene)Ru(L)Cl2 + P* = (η6-p-cymene)Ru(P*)Cl2 + L (1)

(i) the integrals of the respective 31P resonances for free P* and Cl2CymRu-P* and also (ii) the integrals of respective 1H resonances (for either free P*/Ru—P* or Cl2CymRu-L/Cl2CymRu-P*). For L = 4-fluoroaniline, the 31P-NMR spectrum of the equilibrium solution afforded by mixing equimolar amounts of (η6-p-cymene)Ru(4—F—C6H4NH2)Cl2 and P* in CDCl3 displayed just the two signals expected for free P* and Ru—P* (Fig. 2). However, the 19F NMR spectrum (Fig. 3) showed three resonances, a quick indication that our standard Cl2CymRu-L experimental design was invalid for use with anilines.

Experimental

All solvents in synthesis were Fisher reagent-grade. To a stirred solution of 0.100 mmol [(η6-p-cymene)RuCl2]2 (Strem Chemicals) in 10 ml benzene in a 100-ml roundbottom flask was added 0.200 mmol neat 4-fluoroaniline (Sigma-Aldrich). Dripped slowly into the resulting dark-orange solution with stirring were 2.0 ml methyl tert-butyl ether and then 50 ml heptane. The yellow-orange crystals afforded were filtered and washed with two 5-ml portions of hexanes and air-dried (88% yield).

NMR analysis of this product in CDCl3 (Cambridge Laboratories) showed the following signals. 1H δ 0.21, 6H (d, 3JH—H=6.9 Hz); δ 2.11, 3H (s); δ 2.82, 1H (sept, 3JH—H=6.9 Hz); δ 4.90, 2H (s); δ 4.97, 2H (d, 3JH—H=6.1 Hz); δ 5.05, 2H (d, 3JH—H=6.0 Hz); δ 7.09, 2H (d of d; 3JF—H~3JH—H~ 8.5 Hz); δ 7.40, 2H (d of d; 3JH—H=8.5 Hz, 4JF—H=4.5 Hz). 13C{1H} δ 18.60(s), δ 22.06(s), δ 30.60(s), δ 79.65(s), δ 81.50(s), δ 95.91(s), δ 103.59(s), δ 116.32 (d, 1JC—F=22.5 Hz), δ 121.66 (d, 2JC—F=8.1 Hz), δ 141.30 (d, 3JC—F=1.7 Hz). 19F δ -115.71 (t of t, 3JF—H=8.5 Hz; 4JF—H=4.5 Hz); triplets overlap to form apparent "septuplet."

Suitable single crystals were grown from vapor diffusion of 30 ml heptane into a benzene solution of the 4-fluoroaniline complex (25 mg in 5 ml) over six days at room temperature. Traces of remaining liquid were removed by disposable glass pipet from the resulting red crystals which were washed twice with 5.0 ml hexanes and air-dried overnight in the dark.

Refinement

Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and allowed to ride during subsequent refinement, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and C—H distances of 0.93 Å for the aromatic H atoms, Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) and C—H distances of 0.96 Å for the methyl H atoms, Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and a C—H distance of 0.98 Å for the methine H atom, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N) and N—H distances of 0.90 Å for the amine H atoms.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A thermal ellipsoid plot (50%) of the title compound showing the labeling scheme.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

31P{1H} NMR Spectrum of the Equilibrium Mixture Prepared by Mixing Equimolar Amounts of (η6-p-cymene)Ru(4—F—C6H4NH2)Cl2 and P(O-2,4-But2-C6H3)3 in CDCl3 at 23 °C.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

19F NMR Spectrum of the Equilibrium Mixture Prepared by Mixing Equimolar Amounts of (η6-p-cymene)Ru(4—F—C6H4NH2)Cl2 and P(O-2,4-But2-C6H3)3 in CDCl3 at 23 °C.

Crystal data

[RuCl2(C10H14)(C6H6FN)] F(000) = 840
Mr = 417.30 Dx = 1.675 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 8.6492 (9) Å θ = 8.5–13.2°
b = 12.2458 (13) Å µ = 1.27 mm−1
c = 15.6471 (16) Å T = 290 K
β = 93.271 (8)° Prism, red
V = 1654.6 (3) Å3 0.26 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Enraf–Nonius CAD-4 diffractometer 2284 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.048
graphite θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.1°
θ/2θ scans h = 0→10
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→14
Tmin = 0.635, Tmax = 0.779 l = −18→18
3234 measured reflections 3 standard reflections every 120 min
3027 independent reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.090 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0435P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3027 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
193 parameters Δρmax = 0.57 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.67 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ru1 0.22499 (3) 0.59291 (3) 0.611377 (18) 0.02585 (12)
Cl1 0.24408 (14) 0.39815 (9) 0.63052 (7) 0.0442 (3)
Cl2 0.29626 (13) 0.56893 (9) 0.46564 (6) 0.0391 (3)
F1 0.8394 (4) 0.9472 (3) 0.6880 (2) 0.0811 (10)
N1 0.4725 (4) 0.5795 (3) 0.6397 (2) 0.0335 (8)
H1A 0.4864 0.5382 0.6871 0.040*
H1B 0.5116 0.5417 0.5966 0.040*
C1 0.0988 (5) 0.6207 (3) 0.7270 (2) 0.0322 (9)
C2 −0.0055 (5) 0.5901 (4) 0.6567 (3) 0.0353 (9)
H2 −0.0712 0.5309 0.6631 0.042*
C3 −0.0120 (5) 0.6456 (4) 0.5792 (3) 0.0381 (10)
H3 −0.0833 0.6247 0.5356 0.046*
C4 0.0905 (5) 0.7347 (3) 0.5664 (3) 0.0359 (10)
C5 0.1936 (5) 0.7656 (3) 0.6343 (3) 0.0377 (10)
H5 0.2593 0.8247 0.6275 0.045*
C6 0.2000 (5) 0.7087 (3) 0.7133 (2) 0.0337 (9)
H6 0.2719 0.7295 0.7568 0.040*
C7 0.1003 (5) 0.5586 (4) 0.8103 (2) 0.0375 (10)
H7 0.0686 0.4832 0.7979 0.045*
C8 −0.0172 (6) 0.6100 (5) 0.8675 (3) 0.0607 (15)
H8A −0.0165 0.5711 0.9208 0.091*
H8B −0.1187 0.6062 0.8395 0.091*
H8C 0.0098 0.6850 0.8783 0.091*
C9 0.2608 (6) 0.5567 (5) 0.8572 (3) 0.0513 (13)
H9A 0.3347 0.5265 0.8203 0.077*
H9B 0.2572 0.5127 0.9078 0.077*
H9C 0.2908 0.6298 0.8729 0.077*
C10 0.0887 (6) 0.7916 (4) 0.4821 (3) 0.0530 (13)
H10A 0.0348 0.8598 0.4858 0.079*
H10B 0.0372 0.7466 0.4390 0.079*
H10C 0.1932 0.8050 0.4671 0.079*
C11 0.5666 (4) 0.6756 (3) 0.6529 (2) 0.0312 (9)
C12 0.6131 (5) 0.7101 (4) 0.7343 (3) 0.0406 (10)
H12 0.5832 0.6705 0.7813 0.049*
C13 0.7024 (6) 0.8016 (4) 0.7471 (3) 0.0510 (13)
H13 0.7326 0.8251 0.8021 0.061*
C14 0.7458 (5) 0.8573 (4) 0.6771 (4) 0.0508 (12)
C15 0.7011 (5) 0.8263 (4) 0.5954 (3) 0.0539 (13)
H15 0.7319 0.8665 0.5489 0.065*
C16 0.6102 (5) 0.7351 (4) 0.5829 (3) 0.0424 (11)
H16 0.5781 0.7133 0.5278 0.051*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ru1 0.02827 (18) 0.02503 (18) 0.02404 (17) 0.00145 (14) −0.00045 (12) −0.00363 (13)
Cl1 0.0591 (7) 0.0273 (5) 0.0457 (6) 0.0016 (5) −0.0001 (5) 0.0026 (4)
Cl2 0.0435 (6) 0.0486 (7) 0.0252 (5) 0.0095 (5) 0.0027 (4) −0.0046 (4)
F1 0.074 (2) 0.057 (2) 0.111 (3) −0.0266 (18) −0.011 (2) 0.001 (2)
N1 0.0335 (18) 0.035 (2) 0.0319 (17) 0.0073 (16) 0.0001 (14) −0.0108 (15)
C1 0.032 (2) 0.034 (2) 0.031 (2) 0.0024 (17) 0.0060 (17) −0.0075 (17)
C2 0.028 (2) 0.040 (2) 0.037 (2) 0.0000 (19) 0.0018 (16) −0.0040 (19)
C3 0.029 (2) 0.045 (3) 0.040 (2) 0.013 (2) −0.0053 (18) −0.006 (2)
C4 0.036 (2) 0.034 (2) 0.038 (2) 0.0137 (19) 0.0031 (18) 0.0016 (18)
C5 0.046 (2) 0.026 (2) 0.041 (2) 0.0058 (19) 0.0048 (19) −0.0049 (18)
C6 0.034 (2) 0.035 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.0024 (18) −0.0010 (17) −0.0111 (18)
C7 0.046 (3) 0.039 (2) 0.028 (2) −0.007 (2) 0.0020 (18) −0.0046 (18)
C8 0.062 (3) 0.082 (4) 0.039 (3) 0.008 (3) 0.013 (2) −0.003 (3)
C9 0.059 (3) 0.057 (3) 0.037 (2) −0.002 (3) −0.007 (2) 0.007 (2)
C10 0.064 (3) 0.049 (3) 0.046 (3) 0.015 (3) 0.001 (2) 0.012 (2)
C11 0.026 (2) 0.036 (2) 0.032 (2) 0.0046 (18) 0.0015 (16) −0.0056 (17)
C12 0.042 (2) 0.046 (3) 0.034 (2) −0.001 (2) −0.0034 (18) −0.003 (2)
C13 0.051 (3) 0.056 (3) 0.044 (3) −0.002 (3) −0.008 (2) −0.017 (2)
C14 0.035 (2) 0.042 (3) 0.074 (4) 0.003 (2) −0.006 (2) −0.007 (3)
C15 0.044 (3) 0.055 (3) 0.063 (3) −0.003 (2) 0.013 (2) 0.015 (3)
C16 0.041 (2) 0.052 (3) 0.034 (2) 0.003 (2) 0.0025 (18) −0.004 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ru1—C2 2.154 (4) C6—H6 0.9300
Ru1—C6 2.154 (4) C7—C8 1.528 (6)
Ru1—C5 2.165 (4) C7—C9 1.533 (6)
Ru1—N1 2.167 (3) C7—H7 0.9800
Ru1—C3 2.180 (4) C8—H8A 0.9600
Ru1—C4 2.184 (4) C8—H8B 0.9600
Ru1—C1 2.192 (4) C8—H8C 0.9600
Ru1—Cl1 2.4082 (11) C9—H9A 0.9600
Ru1—Cl2 2.4138 (10) C9—H9B 0.9600
F1—C14 1.372 (6) C9—H9C 0.9600
N1—C11 1.439 (5) C10—H10A 0.9600
N1—H1A 0.9000 C10—H10B 0.9600
N1—H1B 0.9000 C10—H10C 0.9600
C1—C6 1.412 (6) C11—C12 1.381 (5)
C1—C2 1.433 (6) C11—C16 1.384 (6)
C1—C7 1.508 (6) C12—C13 1.369 (6)
C2—C3 1.388 (6) C12—H12 0.9300
C2—H2 0.9300 C13—C14 1.361 (7)
C3—C4 1.427 (6) C13—H13 0.9300
C3—H3 0.9300 C14—C15 1.367 (7)
C4—C5 1.401 (6) C15—C16 1.374 (7)
C4—C10 1.491 (6) C15—H15 0.9300
C5—C6 1.418 (6) C16—H16 0.9300
C5—H5 0.9300
C2—Ru1—C6 68.48 (15) C5—C4—C3 118.3 (4)
C2—Ru1—C5 80.44 (17) C5—C4—C10 121.3 (4)
C6—Ru1—C5 38.32 (16) C3—C4—C10 120.4 (4)
C2—Ru1—N1 148.59 (14) C5—C4—Ru1 70.5 (2)
C6—Ru1—N1 92.17 (14) C3—C4—Ru1 70.8 (2)
C5—Ru1—N1 99.88 (15) C10—C4—Ru1 129.4 (3)
C2—Ru1—C3 37.34 (16) C4—C5—C6 121.4 (4)
C6—Ru1—C3 80.99 (16) C4—C5—Ru1 72.0 (2)
C5—Ru1—C3 67.91 (17) C6—C5—Ru1 70.4 (2)
N1—Ru1—C3 166.94 (15) C4—C5—H5 119.3
C2—Ru1—C4 68.45 (16) C6—C5—H5 119.3
C6—Ru1—C4 69.00 (15) Ru1—C5—H5 131.2
C5—Ru1—C4 37.57 (16) C1—C6—C5 120.9 (4)
N1—Ru1—C4 128.89 (15) C1—C6—Ru1 72.5 (2)
C3—Ru1—C4 38.16 (16) C5—C6—Ru1 71.2 (2)
C2—Ru1—C1 38.48 (15) C1—C6—H6 119.5
C6—Ru1—C1 37.91 (15) C5—C6—H6 119.5
C5—Ru1—C1 68.81 (16) Ru1—C6—H6 129.1
N1—Ru1—C1 112.05 (14) C1—C7—C8 109.0 (4)
C3—Ru1—C1 68.83 (15) C1—C7—C9 112.6 (4)
C4—Ru1—C1 82.05 (15) C8—C7—C9 109.9 (4)
C2—Ru1—Cl1 90.08 (12) C1—C7—H7 108.4
C6—Ru1—Cl1 124.65 (12) C8—C7—H7 108.4
C5—Ru1—Cl1 162.78 (12) C9—C7—H7 108.4
N1—Ru1—Cl1 80.78 (9) C7—C8—H8A 109.5
C3—Ru1—Cl1 112.26 (13) C7—C8—H8B 109.5
C4—Ru1—Cl1 149.19 (12) H8A—C8—H8B 109.5
C1—Ru1—Cl1 94.86 (11) C7—C8—H8C 109.5
C2—Ru1—Cl2 126.86 (11) H8A—C8—H8C 109.5
C6—Ru1—Cl2 145.24 (12) H8B—C8—H8C 109.5
C5—Ru1—Cl2 108.47 (12) C7—C9—H9A 109.5
N1—Ru1—Cl2 83.19 (9) C7—C9—H9B 109.5
C3—Ru1—Cl2 96.05 (11) H9A—C9—H9B 109.5
C4—Ru1—Cl2 87.26 (11) C7—C9—H9C 109.5
C1—Ru1—Cl2 164.70 (11) H9A—C9—H9C 109.5
Cl1—Ru1—Cl2 88.72 (4) H9B—C9—H9C 109.5
C11—N1—Ru1 120.8 (2) C4—C10—H10A 109.5
C11—N1—H1A 107.1 C4—C10—H10B 109.5
Ru1—N1—H1A 107.1 H10A—C10—H10B 109.5
C11—N1—H1B 107.1 C4—C10—H10C 109.5
Ru1—N1—H1B 107.1 H10A—C10—H10C 109.5
H1A—N1—H1B 106.8 H10B—C10—H10C 109.5
C6—C1—C2 116.8 (4) C12—C11—C16 119.4 (4)
C6—C1—C7 122.7 (4) C12—C11—N1 121.0 (4)
C2—C1—C7 120.4 (4) C16—C11—N1 119.6 (4)
C6—C1—Ru1 69.6 (2) C13—C12—C11 121.1 (4)
C2—C1—Ru1 69.3 (2) C13—C12—H12 119.4
C7—C1—Ru1 130.9 (3) C11—C12—H12 119.4
C3—C2—C1 122.4 (4) C14—C13—C12 118.1 (4)
C3—C2—Ru1 72.4 (2) C14—C13—H13 120.9
C1—C2—Ru1 72.2 (2) C12—C13—H13 120.9
C3—C2—H2 118.8 C13—C14—C15 122.5 (5)
C1—C2—H2 118.8 C13—C14—F1 119.3 (5)
Ru1—C2—H2 129.1 C15—C14—F1 118.2 (5)
C2—C3—C4 120.2 (4) C14—C15—C16 119.2 (5)
C2—C3—Ru1 70.3 (2) C14—C15—H15 120.4
C4—C3—Ru1 71.1 (2) C16—C15—H15 120.4
C2—C3—H3 119.9 C15—C16—C11 119.6 (4)
C4—C3—H3 119.9 C15—C16—H16 120.2
Ru1—C3—H3 131.6 C11—C16—H16 120.2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1B···Cl2i 0.90 2.39 3.225 (3) 154
C6—H6···Cl1ii 0.93 2.72 3.384 (4) 129

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: IS2638).

References

  1. Begley, M. J., Harrison, S. & Wright, A. H. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 318–320.
  2. Boutadla, Y., Davies, D. L., Al-Duaij, O., Fawcett, J., Jones, R. C. & Singh, K. (2010). Dalton Trans. pp. 10447–10457. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Burrell, A. K. & Steedman, A. J. (1997). Organometallics, 16, 1203–1208.
  4. Carter, E. B., Culver, S. L., Fox, P. A., Goode, R. D., Ntai, I., Tickell, M. D., Traylor, R. K., Hoffman, N. W. & Davis, J. H. Jr (2004). Chem. Commun. pp. 630–631. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Heeten, R. den, Munoz, B. K., Popa, G., Laan, W. & Kamer, P. C. J. (2010). Dalton Trans. pp. 8477–8483. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  7. Enraf–Nonius (1993). CAD-4-PC Software. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.
  8. Fawcett, J., Sicilia, F. & Solan, G. A. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m1256–m1257.
  9. Govindaswamy, P. & Kollipara, M. R. (2006). J. Coord. Chem. 59, 131–136.
  10. Hanif, M., Henke, H., Meier, S. M., Martic, S., Labib, M., Kandioller, W., Jakupec, M. A., Arion, V. B., Kraatz, H.-B., Keppler, B. K. & Hartinger, C. G. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 7953–7963. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Harms, K. & Wocadlo, S. (1995). XCAD4 University of Marburg, Germany.
  12. Hoffman, N. W., Stenson, A. C., Sykora, R. E., Traylor, R. K., Wicker, B. F., Reilly, S., Dixon, D. A., Marshall, A. G., Kwan, M.-L. & Schroder, P. (2009). Abstracts, Central Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society, Cleveland, OH, USA, May 20–23, CRM-213.
  13. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  14. Padmanabhan, V. M., Patel, R. P. & Ranganathan, T. N. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 1305–1307.
  15. Randell, K., Stanford, M. J., Clarkson, G. J. & Rourke, J. P. (2006). J. Organomet. Chem. 691, 3411–3415.
  16. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810051962/is2638sup1.cif

e-67-00m99-sup1.cif (18.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810051962/is2638Isup2.hkl

e-67-00m99-Isup2.hkl (148.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES