Abstract
Strontium (Sr2+) can be selectively extracted from aqueous solutions into supercritical fluid CO2 at 60 °C and 100 atm with dicyclohexano-18-crown-6 (DC18C6) using CF3(CF2)6CO2− (PFOA−) or CF3(CF2)6CF2SO3− (PFOSA−) as a counter anion; at a mole ratio of Sr2+ : DC18C6 : PFOA− = 1:10:50, the extraction of Sr (5.6 × 10−5 M) from water at pH 3 is near quantitative whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ at equal concentration are only extracted to a level of 7 and 1%, respectively; PFOSA− is an effective counter anion for selective extraction of Sr2+ from 1.3 M HNO3 with DC18C6 in supercritical CO2.
Research in selective transport of metal ions in supercritical (sc)-CO2 is of considerable current interest because of its potential applications in a variety of chemical processes which may be carried out in this environmentally friendly solvent.1,2 Selective extraction of alkali metal and alkaline earth metal ions from aqueous solutions to organic solvents with crown ethers is well established in the literature. Extraction of these hard metal ions with crown ethers in scCO2 is expected to be difficult because of limited solubilities of the resulting metal complexes in CO2.3 It is known that fluorinated metal chelates are CO2-philic.4 Thus, fluorination of ligands is one method of increasing solubility of metal complexes in CO2. This approach requires the design and synthesis of specific fluorinated macrocyclic compounds. Another method is to extract crown ether-metal complexes as ion-pairs into scCO2 utilizing fluorinated counteranions. We report for the first time the successful extraction of Sr2+ from aqueous media into scCO2 utilizing a macrocyclic compound and a fluorinated counter anion.
It is known that 18-membered crown ethers with cavity diameters in the range 2.6–2.8 Å are the most suitable hosts for Sr2+ (2.2 Å).5 For example, 90Sr can be selectively extracted from nitric acid solutions with dicyclohexano-18-crown-6 (DC18C6) dissolved in a paraffinic or halogenated solvent, where nitrate serves as the counter anion.6 This macrocyclic system is currently being evaluated for removing 90Sr (t½ = 30 years), a major uranium fission product, from the high level acidic nuclear wastes stored at the Idaho DOE site. However, disposal of organic liquid wastes generated from any solvent extraction process is a problem of environmental concern today because of changing government regulations. Supercritical fluid extraction provides several advantages over conventional solvent extraction including minimization of waste generation, allowing rapid separation of extracted metal complexes, and enhancement of transport speed due to high diffusivity of the supercritical fluid.
The high-pressure apparatus for supercritical fluid extraction of aqueous systems has been described previously.7 A measured amount of DC18C6 and a fluorinated counter anion, both dissolved in chloroform, was loaded into a 10 mL stainless steel extraction vessel and evaporated to dryness on a water bath at 60 °C with flowing nitrogen gas. 5 mL of an aqueous solution containing a mixture of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ at 5.6 × 10−5 M each were then added to the vessel. The vessel was pressurized with CO2 and heated to the desired temperature. After 20 min of static extraction, the exit valve was opened and the system was flushed with scCO2 for 20 min. The aqueous solution before and after extraction was analyzed by an ICP/AES instrument for metal contents.
DC18C6 is quite soluble in scCO2, with a solubility estimated to be > 10−2 mol L−1 at 60 °C and 100 atm, according to our experiments. Direct extraction of Sr2+ (5.6 × 10−5 M) with an excess of DC18C6 (5.4 × 10−4 M) in supercritical CO2 showed virtually no detectable extraction of Sr2+ from water (Table 1) or from a 1.3 M nitric acid solution (Table 2). With the addition of a fluorinated carboxylic acid such as pentadecafluoro-n-octanoic acid (HPFOA), extraction of Sr2+ from water with DC18C6 in scCO2 became significant. The pH of water in equilibrium with scCO2 under the experimental conditions should be ca. 2.9 according to a previous study.8 Because of the inductive effect of the fluorinated group in HPFOA, the pKa value of this perfluorinated acid is ca. 1. Therefore, HPFOA is expected to exist as the anionic form PFOA− under the specified experimental conditions of this water/scCO2 system. With a concentration of Sr2+ = 5.6 × 10−5 M and a mol ratio of Sr2+: DC18C6:PFOA− = 1:5:10, ca. 36% of the Sr2+ was removed from the water after 20 min of static extraction followed by 20 min of dynamic flushing at 60 °C and 100 atm. The percentage extraction of Ca2+ and Mg2+ (at equal concentration as Sr2+) under the same conditions was negligible (3% or less). By doubling the concentration of DC18C6 (i.e. at a mol ratio of Sr2+: DC18C6: PFOA− = 1:10:10), ca. 52% of the Sr2+ in the water phase was removed at 60 °C and 100 atm. Assuming the percentage Sr extraction from water represents equilibrium partition, we may estimate the distribution coefficient DSr (concentration of Sr in the CO2 phase over that in the aqueous phase) from the extraction data using the relationship DSr = (Ci − Cf)/Cf, where Ci and Cf are the concentration of Sr in water before and after the extraction, respectively. The DSr value appears to double (from 0.56 to 1.08) when the Sr2+: DC18C6: PFOA− ratio is increased from 1:5:10 to 1:10:10, suggesting the stoichiometry of Sr to DC18C6 in the complex is most likely 1:1. In the absence of DC18C6, extraction of Sr2+ was negligible at 60 °C and 100 atm (Sr2+: PFOA− = 1:10). Pressure has a minor effect on Sr2+ extraction. At 60 °C and 300 atm, the percentage extraction of Sr2+ was increased to 58% at a mol ratio of Sr2+: DC18C6: PFOA− = 1:10:10.
Table 1.
Extraction of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ from water by sc fluid CO2 containing DC18C6 and perfluorinated counter anion PFOA− or PFOSA− at 60 °C and 100 atma
| Mol ratio |
Extraction (%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2+:DC18C6:HPFOA | Sr2+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | ||
| 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 10 | 4 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 36 ± 2 | 1 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 52 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| 1 | 10 | 50 | 98 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 |
| NEt4PFOSA | |||||
| 1 | 0 | 10 | 12 ± 2 | 6 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 98 ± 2 | 45 ± 4 | 2 ± 1 |
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 99 ± 1 | 66 ± 5 | 2 ± 1 |
| KPFOSA | |||||
| 1 | 10 | 10 | 97 ± 2 | 8 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 |
The aqueous solution contained a mixture of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ with a concentration of 5.6 × 10−5 M each; pH of water under equilibrium with scCO2 = 2.9; 20 min static followed by 20 min dynamic flushing at a flow rate of 2 mL min−1. HPFOA = CF3(CF2)6CO2H; NEt4PFOSA = NEt4[CF3(CF2)6CF2SO3]; KPFOSA = CF3(CF2)6CF2SO3K.
Table 2.
Extraction of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ from 1.3 M HNO3 by scCO2 containing DC18C6 and HPFOA or PFOSA salt at 35 °C and 200 atma
| Mol ratio |
Extraction (%) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2+:DC18C6:HPFOA | Sr2+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | ||
| 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 10 | 50 | 18 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 |
| KPFOSA | |||||
| 1 | 10 | 50 | 60 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 |
| 1 | 20 | 50 | 76 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | 1 ± 1 |
| NEt4PFOSA | |||||
| 1 | 10 | 50 | 61 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 2 ± 1 |
The acid solution contained a mixture of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ with a concentration of 5.6 × 10−5 M each; 20 min static followed by 20 min dynamic flushing at a flow rate of 2 mL min−1.
The extraction of Sr2+ showed a strong dependence on PFOA− concentration. With a mol ratio of Sr2+: DC18C6:PFOA− = 1:10:50, nearly quantitative extraction (98%) of Sr2+ from water into scCO2 was observed at 60 °C and 100 atm. Under these conditions, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were extracted at 7 and 1%, respectively. Selective transport of Sr2+ in the presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ from an aqueous solution to the scCO2 phase apparently can be achieved using DC18C6 and PFOA− according to the results shown in Table 1. Based on the extraction data, we also estimated the variation of DSr with respect to the HPFOA concentration. Values of DSr increase from 1.1 to ca. 49 when the concentration of the HPFOA is increased by a factor of five. This suggests that the Sr2+–crown complex extracted into the supercritical fluid probably involves 2 PFOA−. Accurate measurement of D values in supercritical fluids requires a different experimental design. The preliminary results obtained from this supercritical fluid extraction study appear consistent with the charge neutralization requirement and the general concept of crown ether extraction.
The rate of extraction of Sr2+ from aqueous phase into scCO2 with DC18C6 and HPFOA is reasonably fast. At 60 °C, 100 atm and with a Sr2+: DC18C6:PFOA− ratio of 1:10:10 in water, the supercritical fluid extraction of Sr was found to be 11, 49, 52 and 51, for 5, 11, 19 and 30 min of static extraction, respectively. The dynamic flushing time for these experiments was fixed at 20 min. Under the specified experimental conditions, 20 min of static extraction appear sufficient to reach equilibrium.
When perfluoro-1-octanesulfonic acid tetraethylammonium salt, NEt4 PFOSA, was used instead of HPFOA, the extraction efficiency for Sr2+ from water became higher but the selectivity for Sr2+ over Ca2+ and Mg2+ was reduced. At a Sr2+: DC18C6:NEt4PFOSA ratio of 1:10:10, the percentage extraction of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were 99, 66, and 2%, respectively. If the potassium salt KPFOSA was used in the extraction instead of the NEt4+ salt, selective extraction of Sr2+ was observed. For KPFOSA, the extraction of Sr2+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were 97, 8 and 2%, respectively (Table 1). The cause of the unusual Ca2+ extraction from water with NEt4PFOSA and DC18C6 in supercritical CO2 is not known.
Selective extraction of Sr2+ by scCO2 with DC18C6 and a fluorinated counter anion was also observed in 1.3 M HNO3 (Table 2). The extraction of Sr2+ in the acid solution with a Sr2+:DC18C6:KPFOSA ratio of 1:10:50 was 60% whereas Ca2+ and Mg2+ were extracted at a level of ca. 8 and 2%, respectively. The extraction efficiency of Sr2+ increased to 76% when the crown ether concentration was doubled (Table 2). NEt4PFOSA did not show unusual Ca2+ extraction from the acid solution when it was used with DC18C6 in scCO2. The fluorinated carboxylic acid HPFOA is less effective than the fluorinated sulfonic acid for Sr2+ extraction in the acid solution. In general, a high selectivity of extracting Sr2+ over Ca2+ and Mg2+ was observed in all the acid solution experiments. It should be pointed out that the high level acidic nuclear wastes stored at the Idaho DOE site is in 1.3 M HNO3.
The experimental results obtained from this study suggest that Sr2+ in water or in 1.3 M nitric acid can be selectively extracted as ion-pairs with DC18C6 and a fluorinated counter anion in supercritical fluid CO2. Utilizing the same principle of synergism, other alkali metal and alkaline earth metal ions probably can also be extracted in supercritical CO2 with proper selection of macrocyclic hosts and perfluorinated counter anions. The possibility of extracting and transporting alkali metals and alkaline earth metals selectively in supercritical CO2 suggests a number of potential applications including removal of major fission products 137Cs and 90Sr from aqueous or acidic nuclear wastes and phase transfer catalysis for specific reactions in supercritical CO2.
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the DOE-EMSP Program and to NRC-Nuclear Waste Management Program for financial support.
Notes and references
- 1.Wai CM, Hunt F, Ji M, Chen X. J Chem Educ. 1998;75:1641. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Smart NG, Phelps CL, Wai CM. Chem Br. 1998;34(8):34. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smart NG, Carleson TE, Kast T, Clifford AA, Burford MD, Wai CM. Talanta. 1997;44:137. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(96)02008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Laintz KE, Wai CM, Yonker CR, Smith RD. J Supercrit Fluids. 1991;4:194. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Blasius E, Klein W, Schoeon UJ. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 1985;89:389. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mohite BS, Khopkar SM. Anal Chem. 1987;59:1200. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lin Y, Smart NG, Wai CM. Environ Sci Technol. 1995;29:2706. doi: 10.1021/es00010a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Toews KL, Shroll RM, Wai CM, Smart NG. Anal Chem. 1995;67:4040. [Google Scholar]
