Abstract
Schistosomiasis (bilharzia) is a tropical disease caused by trematode parasites (Schistosoma) that affects hundreds of millions of people in the developing world. Currently only a single drug (praziquantel) is available to treat this disease, highlighting the importance of developing new techniques to study Schistosoma. While molecular advances, including RNA interference and the availability of complete genome sequences for two Schistosoma species, will help to revolutionize studies of these animals, an array of tools for visualizing the consequences of experimental perturbations on tissue integrity and development needs to be made widely available. To this end, we screened a battery of commercially available stains, antibodies and fluorescently labeled lectins, many of which have not been described previously for analyzing schistosomes, for their ability to label various cell and tissue types in the cercarial stage of S. mansoni. This analysis uncovered more than 20 new markers that label most cercarial tissues, including the tegument, the musculature, the protonephridia, the secretory system and the nervous system. Using these markers we present a high-resolution visual depiction of cercarial anatomy. Examining the effectiveness of a subset of these markers in S. mansoni adults and miracidia, we demonstrate the value of these tools for labeling tissues in a variety of life-cycle stages. The methodologies described here will facilitate functional analyses aimed at understanding fundamental biological processes in these parasites.
Author Summary
Schistosomes are parasitic flatworms that infect hundreds of millions of people worldwide. The development of genomic resources and recent application of functional genomic tools (e.g., global gene expression studies, inhibition of gene expression by RNA interference, and transgenesis) hold the promise of revolutionizing the study of schistosome biology. These advances necessitate the introduction of molecular markers for examining the consequences of manipulating schistosome genes. In this manuscript we report the use of several cell type-specific markers and confocal microscopy for visualizing various schistosome tissues in a variety of life-cycle stages. Our analysis provides an atlas of the major organ systems in three different life-cycle stages in these important parasites. The tools and methodologies reported here are widely available and can be readily adopted by researchers interested in more detailed studies of these organisms. We anticipate that these resources will be particularly useful for detailed phenotypic characterization following gene inhibition or over-expression studies.
Introduction
Flatworms of the genus Schistosoma are parasites (Phylum Platyhelmithes) that currently infect over 200 million people worldwide [1]. Similar to other trematodes, Schistosoma have complex life cycles consisting of both free-living and parasitic forms [2]. Upon passage from a vertebrate, schistosome eggs that reach freshwater will hatch and produce miracidia, that swim by ciliary movement to locate and penetrate a suitable snail host. Following entry into the snail, miracidia undergo a dramatic developmental conversion, resulting in the production of primary and then secondary sporocysts, which have the capacity to generate thousands of cercariae. Cercariae are then liberated from the snail into freshwater where they can penetrate the epidermis of a vertebrate host. These animals (now called schistosomula) enter the host's circulatory system, eventually migrating to the liver where they feed on blood and develop to adulthood as either male or female worms. Separate sexed worms then pair, begin reproducing, and complete the life cycle by laying eggs that are passed via the urine or feces depending on the schistosome species.
Despite the daunting complexity of the schistosome life cycle, great strides have been made in developing modern tools to study these parasites. RNA interference has been used to disrupt gene function in eggs [3], [4], transforming cercariae [5], schistosomula [6], [7], [8], and adults [3], [9]. Such breakthroughs have opened the possibility for large-scale RNAi-based screens [8], [10]. Furthermore, transgenic approaches [11], and whole-mount in situ hybridization [15] techniques have been described, providing additional avenues to analyze gene function. These tools, combined with access to complete genome sequences for S. mansoni [16] and S. japonicum [17], will facilitate a greater understanding of these parasites, making this an exciting time for schistosome research. To fully realize the potential of these newly developed functional genomic tools, however, methods for analyzing changes in cell/tissue morphology following experimental perturbations will need to be developed. Furthermore, a collection of reagents to label distinct organ systems in a variety of life-cycle stages will facilitate a greater understanding of the complex developmental transitions these animals experience. One successful methodology for examining schistosome anatomy has been the combination of fluorescence microscopy with histological stains, such as carmine red or phalloidin. For example, carmine staining has been used to describe the reproductive anatomy of paired vs. unpaired adult females [18], [19] and phalloidin has been utilized to describe the musculature of a number of life-cycle stages [20], [21], [22]. Although these reagents will continue to be valuable tools, they are limited by their individual specificities; thus, there is a need to identify additional markers that will allow high-resolution analyses of distinct schistosome cell types and tissues.
Immunofluorescence microscopy has become an indispensable tool for detailed examination of tissue morphology during development and following experimental perturbation. Although species-specific antibodies are widely available for classic model organisms (e.g. Drosophila and mouse), only a limited set of these reagents have been generated for organisms with smaller research communities (e.g. Schistosoma). In emerging model systems such as planarians, a free-living relative of parasitic trematodes, systematic examination of cross-reactivity with commercially available antibodies from other species [23], [24] has been used to overcome the limited access to species-specific immunological resources. Such analyses identified markers for the planarian nervous system, stem cells, protonephridia, intestine, and reproductive system. A similar approach has been used to identify antibodies that label the schistosome nervous system (e.g. [25], [26], [27]); however, this approach has not yielded useful markers for other cell and tissue types. Lectins are proteins that recognize specific carbohydrate moieties, and when conjugated to reporter molecules (e.g. enzymes or fluorophores) can be useful for labeling specific vertebrate [27] and invertebrate [28], [29] tissues. Although some lectins have been used previously to label schistosome tissues [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], detailed descriptions of their labeling have not been reported using modern methodologies such as confocal microscopy.
Here we identify and characterize a collection of antibodies and lectins that label specific tissues of S. mansoni cercariae and use these stains to provide a detailed description of cercarial anatomy. We also examined both adults and miracidia and present a description of the protonephridial, reproductive and nervous systems in these stages using these tools. Together, these studies provide new tools and methods for studying these important parasites.
Materials and Methods
Obtaining free-living stages of S. mansoni
Schistosome-infected (Puerto Rican strain NMRI) Swiss-Webster mice were provided by the Schistosome Resource Center. S. mansoni eggs were obtained from mouse livers essentially as previously described [35]. To obtain miracidia, eggs were resuspended in artificial pond water (0.46 µM FeCl3 ⋅6 H2O, 220 µM CaCl2 ⋅2 H2O, 100 µM MgS04 ⋅7 H2O, phosphate buffer [313 µM KH2PO4, 14 µM (NH4)2SO4] pH 7.2) and exposed to light either in a darkened side-arm flask [35] or a 24-well tissue culture plate [36]. S. mansoni cercariae were obtained from Biomphalaria glabrata snails (Schistosome Resource Center) by exposing snails to direct light at 28°C for ∼1–2 hours. B. glabrata snails were maintained in artificial pond water and fed Layer Crumbles (chicken feed) (Rural King, Mattoon, IL). In adherence to the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, all experiments with and care of vertebrate animals were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (protocol approval number 10035).
Fixation and staining of miracidia and cercariae
For fixation of miracidia and cercariae, an 8% formaldehyde solution was prepared by diluting 36% formaldehyde (EMD Chemical, Darmstadt, Germany) in artificial pond water. This solution was added to an equal volume of miracidia or cercariae (also in artificial pond water), agitated vigorously, and incubated for 20–25 m, except for staining with anti-synapsin where samples were fixed for 2 h. Typical volumes for fixation were >20 ml. Fixed animals either settled by gravity or were pelleted by a brief spin (∼5–10 s) in an Eppendorf 5810R centrifuge (Hamburg, Germany) with brake settings on 0 or 1. Following fixation, samples were rinsed in PBSTx (PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100). For subsequent steps, we found two convenient methods for specimen handing. First, samples were aliquoted to a 96-well microtiter plates and allowed to settle by gravity between liquid exchange steps. Alternatively, samples could be processed in 1.7 ml microcentifuge tubes and liquid exchanges could be performed either after gravity settling of the samples or following a brief spin (<5 sec.) in a benchtop microfuge.
The staining with some reagents was significantly improved by a brief Proteinase K digestion. For this treatment, samples were incubated in Proteinase K solution (2 µg/mL (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 0.5% SDS, in 1X PBSTx) for 5 min, allowed to settle by gravity, and post-fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBSTx for 10 min. Since staining with the anti-synapsin antibody was sensitive to permeabilization with Proteinase K treatment, samples were permeabilized for 20 min in 1x PBS + 1% SDS. Permeabilization techniques for specific stainings are listed in Table S1.
Following permeabilization, animals were rinsed in PBSTx, incubated in blocking solution (5% horse serum, 0.45% fish elatin, 0.3% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween 20 in 1x PBS) for ∼2 hours and then incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking solution (concentrations indicated in Table S1) for >6 h at 4°C. Following >2 h of washing in PBSTx, samples were incubated in goat anti-mouse Alexa fluor 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Ca; 1∶400–1∶500) for 6 hours to overnight at 4°C. Occasionally, DAPI (1 µg/mL final in PBSTx) and phalloidin conjugated to either rhodamine or Alexa fluor 633 (66 nM final in PBSTx) were added during secondary antibody incubations or wash steps. As an alternative, we experimented with tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to detect antibody staining. For TSA detection, a goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was diluted (1∶100) in blocking solution and incubated with samples for 2 hr at room temperature. Samples were washed for 2 hrs in PBSTx and incubated in Amplification Diluent containing fluorescein tyramide (1∶50; TSA-Plus, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). For anti-synapsin staining, TSA resulted in superior signal-to-noise ratios when compared to detection with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (data not shown). Although this methodology was optimized for anti-synapsin staining, it is anticipated that similar results would be obtained with other murine antibodies.
For lectin staining, animals were fixed and blocked as described above and then incubated overnight at 4°C with a fluorophore-conjugated lectin diluted 1∶500 in blocking solution. Lectins were obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA) and diluted from 2 mg/mL stocks. Samples were washed in PBSTx and stained with a combination of DAPI and Alexa fluor 633 phalloidin.
Fixation and staining of adult S. mansoni
Adult S. mansoni perfused from mice [35] were fixed for 30 minutes at room temperature in 4% formaldehyde diluted in PBSTx. Following brief rinses in 1x PBSTx samples were dehydrated through a methanol/PBSTx series (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% MeOH) and stored at −20°C until use. Samples were rehydrated by incubation in 1∶1 MeOH:PBSTx followed by incubation in PBSTx. Rehydrated samples were treated with Proteinase K (2 µg/mL) for 10 minutes at room temperature and then post-fixed for 10 minutes in 4% formaldehyde in PBSTx. Samples were processed for immunohistochemistry and lectin staining similar to cercariae and miracidia. For staining with phalloidin, methanol dehydration and Proteinase K treatments were omitted.
Imaging
Samples were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or a mixture of Vectashield and 80% glycerol and imaged on a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) (Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 Oil DIC objective). Alexa 488/FITC, Alexa 568/Rhodamine, and Alexa 633 flours were excited with 488 nm, 561 nm, and 633 nm lasers, respectively. Images were processed either using Zen 2009 (Carl Zeiss, Germany), ImageJ [37], or Imaris (Bitplane AG Zurich, Switzerland). Movies were made using iMovie '09 (Apple, Cupertino, CA).
Results
To elucidate cell- and tissue-specific markers useful for anatomical analyses of Schistosoma, we examined a panel of antibodies, lectins and histological stains in S. mansoni cercariae. We chose cercariae over other stages because these animals are easily maintained in the laboratory and can be obtained in large numbers, facilitating the optimization of fixation and permeabilization conditions. Furthermore, since the cercariae possess many tissues present in other life-cycle stages (e.g. protonephridial and nervous systems), we predicted that cercarial markers would have utility in other stages. Below we report the results of these studies with our observations reported by organ system.
Surface structures and musculature
Cercaria are covered by a sugar-rich layer, called the glycocalyx, that sits upon the tegument, a modified syncytial epidermis characterized by a trilaminate membrane system [2], [38], [39]. In S. mansoni cercariae spines that face posterior and cover nearly the entire surface of the animal are prominent features of the tegument [20], [38]. Similar to previous reports [20], we find that these spines can be labeled with phalloidin (Figure 1A), consistent with these spines being rich in filamentous actin. Because the goal of this life-cycle stage is to locate and penetrate a suitable host, cercariae also possess a variety of ciliated sensory papillae [38]. We observed ciliated regions of unsheathed papillae scattered along the entire length of the animal by staining with antibodies specific to β-tubulin (Figure 1A, B) and acetylated α-tubulin (Table S1). Additionally, the openings of these ciliated papillae could be visualized as phalloidin-stained discs (Figure 1 A, B) that encircle cilia projecting through the tegument(Figure 1A, B).
The cercarial basement membrane serves as the interface for the attachment of the exterior tegument and the underlying body wall musculature. In cercariae this structure stained with a variety of lectins such as Pisum sativum lectin (PSA) (Figure 1C, D, E and Table S1). Double labeling with PSA and Peanut lectin agglutinin (PNA), revealed that PNA marked a layer of material outside the basement membrane at the level of the actin-rich spines embedded in the tegument. This PNA labeling could represent the tegument itself or the sugar-rich glycocalyx coating the outside of the cercarial tegument [38].
Similar to free-living flatworms, the body wall musculature of the cercariae consists of an external layer of circular muscles situated above longitudinal muscles that are interweaved with diagonal fibers [39]. Phalloidin stained all three muscle layers within the animal (Figure 1F and Movie S1) as well as other structures such as the acetabulum (ventral sucker) (Figure 1G and H), mouth, esophagus, and flame cells of the protonephridial system (described below). Since a previous study used phalloidin staining to describe the cercarial musculature [20], we refer readers to this reference for a detailed description of phalloidin staining. In addition to phalloidin staining, we were able to visualize the longitudinal muscles of the tail with an antibody that recognizes phosphorylated serine and threonine (anti-phospho S/T) residues (Figure 1I). Since we failed to observe anti-phospho S/T labeling in other cercarial muscle fibers, it is possible that these muscles are physiologically distinct from other muscles in the animal.
Cercarial glands
The five pairs of acetabular glands (three pairs of post-acetabular and two pairs of pre-acetabular) are prominent features of the cercarial anatomy, occupying nearly two-thirds of the volume of the cercarial head [38], [40]. The fundi of these unicellular glands fill the body cavity beneath the acetabulum and project anteriorly through the muscle cone, terminating at the anterior apex of the animal. Although the precise function of these glands has yet to be resolved, the secretion of proteinases rom the pre-acetabular glands [41] and mucus-like substances from the post-acetabular glands [42] suggests roles in host penetration and adhesion. Consistent with previous observations of live cercariae [34], a number of fluorescently labeled lectins stained the acetabular glands (Table S1, Figure 2A, Movie S2), both at their base and along their projections. While most of these lectins labeled the post-acetabular fundi, a subset stained both the pre- and post-acetabular glands. Among these was PNA, which labeled the pre- and post-acetabular glands as well as all ten of their projections (Figure 2A, B, C). Co-labeling with lectins (e.g. PSA or PNA) and phalloidin revealed a ring of musculature surrounding the acetabular ducts just posterior to the muscle cone (Figure 2A and Movie S2). Given the position of these muscles, they may act to initiate contractile forces that expel secretions from the ducts or to control secretion release.
Double labeling with lectins PSA and PNA showed that these individual lectins label unique sub-cellular regions of the post-acetabular glands (Figure 2A). This was most obvious in the ducts, in which PNA staining was concentrated towards the periphery and PSA staining was detected throughout the duct (Movie S2). Furthermore, secretory globules [38], [40] scattered throughout the posterior regions of the glands were labeled to varying extents with either PSA and/or PNA (Figure 2D). This heterogeneous labeling might reflect individual differences in the content of these secretory globules. Ultrastructural studies describe a microtubule network surrounding the entire acetabular gland system [38], [40]. Consistent with these studies we were able to label the fundi and ducts of these glands with anti-acetylated α-tubulin (Figure 2E).
In addition to the acetabular glands, cercariae possess a unicellular gland at the anterior end called the "head gland". This gland has been suggested to provide membrane material required during the cercariae-schistosomula transition following host penetration [43]. Similar to other cercarial glands, the head gland was readily visualized with a variety of lectins (Table S1, Figure 2F).
The protonephridial system
After being shed from their snail host and before locating and penetrating a mammal, cercariae spend a substantial portion of their short lives in freshwater. Cercaria may regulate water balance by controlling permeability through their outer surface (e.g. the tegument and/or glycocalyx) and by excretion of excess fluid by a network of osmoregulatory tubules called protonephridia [44], [45]. Proximally the protonephridia begin as a heavily ciliated cell called a flame cell. Staining of cercariae with antibodies that recognize various tubulin isoforms and modifications showed labeling of the ciliary tufts of flame cells (Figure 3A and C). Anti-tubulin antibodies also labeled several other structures, including portions of the nervous system (see below); proteinase K treatment often abolished this labeling, leaving predominantly protonephridial labeling (Table S1). For example, staining with the anti-β tubulin antibody following Proteinase K treatment provided robust and specific labeling of the flame cells (Figure 3A arrowheads) and ciliated secondary protonephridial tubules (Figure 3A arrows), allowing for easy identification of these cells even by epifluorescence. In contrast to a previous report stating that cercariae have six pairs of flame cells [38], we find that cercariae typically have 5 pairs of flame cells: an anterior-body dorsal pair, a mid-body ventral pair, posterior-body dorsal and ventral pairs, and a pair in the anterior tail (Figure 3A) similar to that described by Skelly and Shoemaker [46]. The base of the flame cell contains a region of tightly packed ciliary rootlets, which label strongly with an anti-phospho S/T antibody, and a nucleus, which is readily identified by DIC microscopy or DAPI staining (Figure 3C). The ciliary tuft of the flame cells sits in a barrel or basket-like structure formed by interdigitation between the flame cell and first tubule cell [38] and labels strongly with an anti-phospho tyrosine (anti-phospho Y) antibody (Figure 3B and 3C). In addition to labeling the flame cell and first tubule cell, anti-phospho Y also strongly labels the protonephridial tubule extending from the bladder to the nephridiopores located at the tips of the tail furci (Figure 3B). The protonephridial tubule splits anterior to the bifurcation of the tail (Figure 3B; blue inset). Although flame cells in the head were labeled by the anti-phospho Y antibody, it was unclear whether the protonephridial tubules were also labeled, since this antibody marked a variety of structures in the head (Table S1 and Movie S3).
Both the flame cells and first tubule cells contain an actin-rich network that is easily visualized using fluorescently labeled phalloidin (Figure 3C). Interestingly, several fluorescently labeled lectins showed differential staining of the extracellular matrix (ECM) surrounding the flame cells (Figure 3C). Lens culinaris agglutinin (LCA) labeled the ECM surrounding the first tubule cell down to the level where this cell interdigitates with the flame cell (Figure 3C). PNA showed labeling of the entire ECM surrounding the first tubule cell and flame cell. PSA labeling was restricted to the ECM surrounding the junction between the first tubule cell and flame cell. It has long been appreciated from ultrastructural observations that platyhelminth flame cells are surrounded by a significant amount of ECM [44]; our findings indicate surprising complexity in the composition of this material. We also observed lectin staining of portions of the protonephridial ducts in the cercarial head (Figure 3D and E and Table S1).
The nervous system
The stereotypical flatworm central nervous system consists of paired cephalic ganglia that connect to nerve cords which extend through the body longitudinally [39], [47]. These nerve cords are often connected by transverse commissures, giving the flatworm nervous system a "ladder" or "orthogonal" appearance. Antibodies that recognize various neurochemical signaling molecules (e.g. neuropeptides) have been invaluable reagents for describing the neural anatomy of a variety of free-living and parasitic flatworms [47]. However, since the neurosignaling molecules recognized by these antibodies are often expressed in restricted cell types in flatworms [48], we explored additional markers that recognize features found more generally in neurons. A monoclonal antibody raised against the D. melanogaster Synapsin-1 protein, that is concentrated in nerve terminals of the fly [49], has been used to label the neuropil of the cephalic ganglia, the nerve cords, the transverse commissures, and the sub-muscular plexus of the planarian S. mediterranea [24]. We find this antibody labels similar structures in the central nervous system of cercariae. Specifically, anti-synapsin staining allowed visualization of the neuropil of the cephalic ganglia (Figure 4A, B, C, D and Movie S4), the six-pairs of longitudinal nerve cords (Figure 4A, B, C), and transverse commissures in the head (Figure 4A, B, C). Additionally, anti-synapsin labeled anterior sensory structures, nerves surrounding the acetabulum, and a pair of nerve cords below the longitudinal muscles of the tail. Of particular interest, we observed projections from the cephalic ganglia innervating muscles surrounding the ducts of the acetabular glands (Figure 4E and Movie S4). This innervation suggests that signals directly from the cephalic ganglia may be involved in controlling secretion from the acetabular glands during penetration.
In addition to anti-synapsin staining, we found that anti-β-tubulin was useful for detecting the nervous system within the tail (Figure 5A, B, C). However, unlike anti-synapsin that labels synaptic regions, anti-β-tubulin stained microtubule-rich neural projections throughout the tail. These fine projections could be observed transversely projecting through the interior of the tail (Figure 5A), superficially between the tegument and the muscles (Figure 5B), and within a pair of cords beneath the longitudinal muscle fibers (Figure 5C).
Reagents useful for analyzing cercaria anatomy can also be used in adults and miracidia
Following host penetration, S. mansoni cercariae (now schistosomula) enter the circulatory system and develop within the lungs before ultimately residing in the vessels of the hepatic portal system. Because cercariae are essentially the template from which the adult animals develop, we examined markers particularly useful for labeling cercariae (Lectins sWGA and PNA and the anti-acetylated α-tubulin antibody) in adult S. mansoni. Consistent with PNA labeling of secretory glands in cercariae (Figure 2A), we observed intense PNA staining of secretory glands surrounding the esophagus in the anterior of male and female worms (Table S1 and Figure 6A). Also similar to cercariae (Table S1), we observed sWGA labeling in the neuropil of the cephalic ganglia (Figure 6A, B) and the extracellular matrix/basement membrane of both sexes. Although adult schistosomes likely rely on the host for regulating fluid balance [44], these animals possess an extensive protonephridial system that consists of flame cells and an elaborate system of ciliated and unciliated ducts [50]. Like cercariae, the ciliated flame cells were detected with anti-acetylated α-tubulin and the ECM of the unciliated ducts stained with sWGA (Figure 6A–D, and Movie S5). Furthermore, anti-acetylated α-tubulin labeled the extensive network of ciliated collecting ducts (Figure 6B–D). Double labeling with sWGA and anti-acetylated α-tubulin allowed for staining of the complete protonephridial system (Figure 6B and D, and Movie S5).
We also found sWGA, PNA and anti-acetylated α-tubulin to be useful for visualizing the male and female reproductive organs. The S. mansoni male reproductive system consists of four to nine testes [2], [51]; the sperm they produce are passed to the female via a cirrus at the anterior end of the gynecophoral canal (Figure 7A). Cortical microtubules surrounding the sperm head and within the sperm flagella were visualized within testes lobes by staining with anti-acetylated α-tubulin (Figure 7B, C). Additionally, we observed sWGA labeling tubular (doughnut shaped) structures between a subset of nuclei in the testes (Figure 7B, C). Because developing germ cells in other animals often remain attached to one another by cytoplasmic bridges (e.g. ring canals [52]), we speculate that these structures could represent canals connecting the cytoplasm of germ cells undergoing spermatogenesis. Spermatozoa passed to a female migrate up the female reproductive tract and are stored in the seminal receptacle located posterior to the ovary; tightly packed sperm were observed in this receptacle by staining with DAPI and anti-acetylated α-tubulin (Figure 8A, B). Occasionally, we also observed “packets” of sperm within the oviduct en route to the seminal receptacle (data not shown). From the seminal receptacle sperm are able to begin the fertilization process as oocytes emerge from the ovary. Oocytes then pass anteriorly though the oviduct (Figure 8A), which merges with the vitelline duct (now the ovo-vitelline duct), before reaching a mass of secretory cells collectively referred to as Mehlis' gland. A variety of functions have been proposed for Mehlis' gland, including providing lubrication for the reproductive tract, activating sperm, and providing aterials for egg shell biosynthesis [53], [54]. Similar to histological [51] and ultrastructural descriptions [55], [56], we observe this gland directly posterior to the ootype (Figure 8C). This observation contrasts that of Neves et al. (2005) [18] who describe the columnar epithelium of the ootype (described by Erasmus [55] and Gönnert [51]) as Mehlis' gland. We found the projections of Mehils' gland cells to label with both sWGA and PNA (Figure 8C, D and Movie S6). Furthermore, we observed anti-acetylated α-tubulin to label microtubules (described previously by Erasmus [55]) at the distal projections of these cells before they enter the ootype (Figure 8C and Movie S6). In cross section the cells of Mehlis' Gland labeled with sWGA, PNA, and anti-acetylated α-tubulin can be seen projecting radially into the posterior ootype (Movie S6). Within the ootype the eggshell coalesces to surround a single fertilized egg and 30–40 vitelline cells [57] (Shown in Figure 8C and Movie S6). This egg is passed anteriorly through the uterus and out the female genital pore.
Upon release into freshwater, eggs generated by the adult schistosome hatch, giving rise to free-living miracidia. Following hatching, miracidia must locate and infect an appropriate snail host. Like the cercariae, miracidia contain a number of ciliated sensory structures on their surface [58]; these can also be labeled with anti-tubulin antibodies (Figure 9A, arrowheads). In addition to labeling the multiciliated sensory papilla, anti-tubulin antibodies also label the numerous motile cilia of the epidermal plates that cover the animal. Interestingly, anti-β-tubulin also showed strong labeling of a cytoplasmic meshwork of microtubules in the germ cells (Figure 9B). Previous ultrastructural analysis of miracidial germ cells suggest that these cells may be anchored through several small projections that extend into the intercellular space [58]. It is possible that the microtubule meshwork we observed functions to generate or maintain these cellular projections.
Phalloidin staining of miracidia facilitates analysis of the elaborate body wall musculature and flame cells (Figure 9C–E, and Movie S7). A detailed description of phalloidin staining has previously been reported, and we refer readers to that work [59]. In cercariae we observed anti-phospho S/T staining of the longitudinal muscles in the tail (Figure 1I). Similarly we observed anti-phospho S/T staining in the miracidia in a circumferential banding pattern similar to that observed for phalloidin staining of the muscle (Figure 9D). It was difficult to ascertain whether this labeling was in the muscle layer itself or in the overlying epidermal plates and ridges. In addition to the superficial banding pattern, we observed anti-phospho S/T labeling of the base of flame cells (Figure 9E bottom arrowheads).
The central nervous system of miracidia resembles that observed in cercariae. The neural mass is centrally located, stains with the anti-synapsin antibody, and is surrounded by neuronal cell bodies that are identifiable by their small ovoid nuclei which stain intensely with DAPI (Figure 9F and Movie S7). Several nerve cords project anteriorly while only a dorsal and ventral nerve cord project posteriorly (Figure 9F, G).
Miracidia contain three glands, an apical gland and two lateral glands [58]. Although we observed staining of the lateral glands with a number of the lectins (Figure 9H and Table S1), only a few lectins were observed staining the apical gland (Table S1). This suggests that the products of the apical gland are likely different than those of the lateral glands, an observation consistent with ultrastructural studies demonstrating differences in size of secretory vesicles in these glands [58]. While several lectins stained ECM and other non-secretory cells in cercariae and adults, we failed to observe significant staining of other cell types in miracidia. While this may reflect real biological differences in miracidial tissues compared to cercarial or adult tissues, it is also possible that our fixation protocol for miracidia either blocked epitopes or failed to fix them sufficiently.
Discussion
These studies describe a number of robust cell-specific labels for three life-cycle stages of S. mansoni. One interesting observation from these studies was that a diverse collection of fluorescently labeled lectins stained secretory glands in all life-cycle stages observed. Specifically, lectins stained the acetabular and head glands of cercariae, the esophageal and Mehlis' gland of adults, and the apical and lateral glands of miracidia. These observations are consistent with previous studies describing lectins, including PNA and WGA, labeling glands, or their secretions [31], in live miracidia and cercariae [34]. Because many of these same lectins label secretory cell types in planarians [29], it is possible these types of cells share a common evolutionary origin and their functions have diverged to accommodate the free-living or parasitic lifestyles of these animals.
Many of the reagents we examined labeled portions of the protonephridial system at a number of life-cycle stages. While one of the major functions ascribed to protonephridia is osmoregulation, the system is not only maintained but becomes elaborated in adults when the parasite conforms to the osmolarity of its host [44]. Recent studies demonstrating uptake of molecules including fluorescent analogs of Pgp/MRP substrates and a fluorescent derivative of praziquantel [60], [61], [62], [63] suggests that the protonephridial system is likely important in drug metabolism and excretion. The combination of morphological markers we have identified, along with fluorescent dye labeling experiments, will be instrumental in analyzing protonephridial phenotypes in future drug and RNA interference studies.
Since egg-induced granuloma formation is the principle cause of the pathology of schistosomiasis, understanding reproductive processes in schistosomes could illuminate new therapeutic opportunities. Using lectins, an antibody against acetylated α-tubulin, and two common fluorescent stains (DAPI and phalloidin, which has been described previously [21]) we were able to clearly visualize the gonads (testes and ovaries) and most accessory reproductive structures (e.g. ootype and Mehlis' gland) in adult schistosomes. The combination of these reagents provides a step forward from more general fluorescence-based approaches previously used to describe the schistosome reproductive system (e.g. carmine red staining [18]), and should provide a useful tool for accessing reproductive development in these parasites.
Collectively, these studies show the utility of this approach for identifying robust markers of schistosome tissues. We anticipate that similar studies focused on other life-cycle stages (e.g. schistosomula and sporocysts) will yield comparable results and will provide additional tools that will enable researchers to dissect the many fascinating biological questions raised by these important parasites.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank David Forsthoefel and Labib Rouhana for comments on the manuscript and Fred Lewis for his help with getting JJC and PAN started on schistosome work. Schistosome life-cycle stages were provided by the NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center and the Biomedical Research Institute (Rockville, MD, USA) through NIAID Contract N01-A1-30026.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (www.nih.gov) F32 HD062124 (JJC). PAN is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (www.hhmi.org). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Chitsulo L, Engels D, Montresor A, Savioli L. The global status of schistosomiasis and its control. Acta Trop. 2000;77:41–51. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00122-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Basch PF. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. Schistosomes: Development, Reproduction, and Host Relations.248 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freitas TC, Jung E, Pearce EJ. TGF-beta signaling controls embryo development in the parasitic flatworm Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e52. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rinaldi G, Morales ME, Alrefaei YN, Cancela M, Castillo E, et al. RNA interference targeting leucine aminopeptidase blocks hatching of Schistosoma mansoni eggs. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009;167:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Skelly PJ, Da'dara A, Harn DA. Suppression of cathepsin B expression in Schistosoma mansoni by RNA interference. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33:363–369. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00030-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morales ME, Rinaldi G, Gobert GN, Kines KJ, Tort JF, et al. RNA interference of Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin D, the apical enzyme of the hemoglobin proteolysis cascade. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2008;157:160–168. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kuntz AN, Davioud-Charvet E, Sayed AA, Califf LL, Dessolin J, et al. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase from Schistosoma mansoni: an essential parasite enzyme and a key drug target. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stefanic S, Dvorak J, Horn M, Braschi S, Sojka D, et al. RNA Interference in Schistosoma mansoni Schistosomula: Selectivity, Sensitivity and Operation for Larger-Scale Screening. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Swierczewski BE, Davies SJ. A schistosome cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is essential for parasite viability. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mourao MM, Dinguirard N, Franco GR, Yoshino TP. Phenotypic screen of early-developing larvae of the blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni, using RNA interference. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3:e502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kines KJ, Mann VH, Morales ME, Shelby BD, Kalinna BH, et al. Transduction of Schistosoma mansoni by vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein-pseudotyped Moloney murine leukemia retrovirus. Exp Parasitol. 2006;112:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morales ME, Mann VH, Kines KJ, Gobert GN, Fraser MJ, Jr, et al. piggyBac transposon mediated transgenesis of the human blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni. FASEB J. 2007;21:3479–3489. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8726com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kines KJ, Morales ME, Mann VH, Gobert GN, Brindley PJ. Integration of reporter transgenes into Schistosoma mansoni chromosomes mediated by pseudotyped murine leukemia virus. FASEB J. 2008;22:2936–2948. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-108308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kines KJ, Rinaldi G, Okatcha TI, Morales ME, Mann VH, et al. Electroporation facilitates introduction of reporter transgenes and virions into schistosome eggs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dillon GP, Illes JC, Isaacs HV, Wilson RA. Patterns of gene expression in schistosomes: localization by whole mount in situ hybridization. Parasitology. 2007;134:1589–1597. doi: 10.1017/S0031182007002995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Berriman M, Haas BJ, LoVerde PT, Wilson RA, Dillon GP, et al. The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Nature. 2009;460:352–358. doi: 10.1038/nature08160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu F, Zhou Y, Wang ZQ, Lu G, Zheng H, et al. The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host-parasite interplay. Nature. 2009;460:345–351. doi: 10.1038/nature08140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Neves RH, de Lamare Biolchini C, Machado-Silva JR, Carvalho JJ, Branquinho TB, et al. A new description of the reproductive system of Schistosoma mansoni (Trematoda: Schistosomatidae) analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Parasitol Res. 2005;95:43–49. doi: 10.1007/s00436-004-1241-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Beckmann S, Quack T, Burmeister C, Buro C, Long T, et al. Schistosoma mansoni: signal transduction processes during the development of the reproductive organs. Parasitology. 2010;137:497–520. doi: 10.1017/S0031182010000053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mair GR, Maule AG, Fried B, Day TA, Halton DW. Organization of the musculature of schistosome cercariae. J Parasitol. 2003;89:623–625. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2003)089[0623:OOTMOS]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mair GR, Maule AG, Day TA, Halton DW. A confocal microscopical study of the musculature of adult Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2000;121(Pt 2):163–170. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099006174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wu XJ, Sabat G, Brown JF, Zhang M, Taft A, et al. Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni proteins released during in vitro miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009;164:32–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Robb SM, Sánchez Alvarado A. Identification of immunological reagents for use in the study of freshwater planarians by means of whole-mount immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Genesis. 2002;32:293–298. doi: 10.1002/gene.10087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cebrià F. Organization of the nervous system in the model planarian Schmidtea mediterranea: an immunocytochemical study. Neurosci Res. 2008;61:375–384. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gustafsson MK. Immunocytochemical demonstration of neuropeptides and serotonin in the nervous systems of adult Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitol Res. 1987;74:168–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00536029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basch PF, Gupta BC. Immunocytochemical localization of regulatory peptides in six species of trematode parasites. Comp Biochem Physiol C. 1988;91:565–570. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(88)90078-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gupta BC, Basch PF. Human chorionic gonadotropin-like immunoreactivity in schistosomes and Fasciola. Parasitol Res. 1989;76:86–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00931078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Callaerts P, Vulsteke V, Peumans W, De Loof A. Lectin binding sites during Drosophila embryogenesis. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1995;204:229–243. doi: 10.1007/BF00208490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zayas R, Cebrià F, Guo T, Feng J, Newmark P. Developemental Dynamics In Press; 2010. The use of lectins as markers for differentiated secretory cells in planarians. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayunga EG, Sumner MP. Expression of lectin-binding surface glycoproteins during the development of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. J Parasitol. 1986;72:913–920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Linder E. Schistosoma mansoni: visualization with fluorescent lectins of secretions and surface carbohydrates of living cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1985;59:307–312. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(85)90085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Linder E, Huldt G. Distribution of exposed and hidden carbohydrates of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms demonstrated by selective binding of fluorochrome-conjugated lectins. Parasitology. 1982;85(Pt 3):503–509. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000056286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nanduri J, Dennis JE, Rosenberry TL, Mahmoud AA, Tartakoff AM. Glycocalyx of bodies versus tails of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Lectin-binding, size, charge, and electron microscopic characterization. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:1341–1347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Coles G, Jansson H, Zuckerman B. Lectin studies of surface carbohydrates and induction of gland secretion in the free-living stages of Schistosoma mansoni. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1988;14:691–700. doi: 10.1007/BF01013916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lewis F. Schistosomiasis. Curr Protoc Immunol Chapter. 2001;19:Unit 19 11. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1901s28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mann VH, Morales ME, Rinaldi G, Brindley PJ. Culture for genetic manipulation of developmental stages of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2009;137:451–462. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image Processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International. 2004;11:36–42. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dorsey CH, Cousin CE, Lewis FA, Stirewalt MA. Ultrastructure of the Schistosoma mansoni cercaria. Micron. 2002;33:279–323. doi: 10.1016/s0968-4328(01)00019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hyman L. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc; 1951. The Invertebrates: Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela The Acoelomate Bilateria.550 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dorsey CH, Stirewalt MA. Schistosoma mansoni: fine structure of cercarial acetabular glands. Exp Parasitol. 1971;30:199–214. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(71)90084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stirewalt MA, Austin BE. Collection of secreted protease from the preacetabular glands of cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni. J Parasitol. 1973;59:741–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stirewalt MA, Walters M. Schistosoma mansoni: histochemical analysis of the postacetabular gland secretion of cercariae. Exp Parasitol. 1973;33:56–72. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(73)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dorsey CH. Schistosoma mansoni: description of the head gland of cercariae and schistosomules at the ultrastructural level. Exp Parasitol. 1976;39:444–459. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(76)90049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wilson RA, Webster LA. Protonephridia. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1974;49:127–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1974.tb01572.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Faghiri Z, Skelly PJ. The role of tegumental aquaporin from the human parasitic worm, Schistosoma mansoni, in osmoregulation and drug uptake. FASEB J. 2009;23:2780–2789. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-130757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Skelly PJ, Shoemaker CB. Schistosoma mansoni proteases Sm31 (cathepsin B) and Sm32 (legumain) are expressed in the cecum and protonephridia of cercariae. J Parasitol. 2001;87:1218–1221. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[1218:SMPSCB]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Halton DW, Maule AG. Flatworm nerve-muscle: structural and functional analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2004;82:316–333. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Collins JJ, III, Hou X, Romanova EV, Lambrus BG, Miller CM, et al. Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal a Role for Peptide Hormones in Planarian Germline Development. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Klagges BR, Heimbeck G, Godenschwege TA, Hofbauer A, Pflugfelder GO, et al. Invertebrate synapsins: a single gene codes for several isoforms in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3154–3165. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03154.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bogers JJ, Nibbeling HA, van Marck EA, Deelder AM. Immunofluorescent visualization of the excretory and gut system of Schistosoma mansoni by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994;50:612–619. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.50.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gönnert R. Schistosomiasis studies. I. Contributions to the anatomy and histology of Schistosoma mansoni. Z Tropenmed Parasitol. 1955;6:18–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Robinson DN, Cant K, Cooley L. Morphogenesis of Drosophila ovarian ring canals. Development. 1994;120:2015–2025. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Smyth JD, Halton DW. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983. The Physiology of Trematodes. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wells KE, Cordingley JS. Schistosoma mansoni: eggshell formation is regulated by pH and calcium. Exp Parasitol. 1991;73:295–310. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(91)90101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Erasmus DA. A comparative study of the reproductive system of mature, immature and "unisexual" female Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 1973;67:165–183. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000046394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Spence IM, Silk MH. Ultrastructural studies of the blood fluke—Schistosoma mansoni. V. The female reproductive system—a preliminary report. S Afr J Med Sci. 1971;36:41–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gönnert R. Schistosomiasis studies. II. Oogenesis of Schistosoma mansoni and the development of the eggs in the host organism. Z Tropenmed Parasitol. 1955;6:33–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pan SC. The fine structure of the miracidium of Schistosoma mansoni. J Invertebr Pathol. 1980;36:307–372. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(80)90040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bahia D, Avelar LG, Vigorosi F, Cioli D, Oliveira GC, et al. The distribution of motor proteins in the muscles and flame cells of the Schistosoma mansoni miracidium and primary sporocyst. Parasitology. 2006;133:321–329. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006000400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sato H, Kusel JR, Thornhill J. Excretion of fluorescent substrates of mammalian multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) in the Schistosoma mansoni excretory system. Parasitology. 2004;128:43–52. doi: 10.1017/s0031182003004177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sato H, Kusel JR, Thornhill J. Functional visualization of the excretory system of adult Schistosoma mansoni by the fluorescent marker resorufin. Parasitology. 2002;125:527–535. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002002536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kusel JR, Oliveira FA, Todd M, Ronketti F, Lima SF, et al. The effects of drugs, ions, and poly-l-lysine on the excretory system of Schistosoma mansoni. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101(Suppl 1):293–298. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762006000900046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tan HH, Thornhill JA, Al-Adhami BH, Akhkha A, Kusel JR. A study of the effect of surface damage on the uptake of Texas Red-BSA by schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology. 2003;126:235–240. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002002846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.