Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Feb 5;67(Pt 3):o575. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811003941

2-[(Meth­oxy­carbonothio­yl)sulfan­yl]acetic acid

Shude Xiao a, Paul A Charpentier a,*
PMCID: PMC3051980  PMID: 21522337

Abstract

The title compound, C4H6O3S2, features a characteristic xanthate group; the C=S double bond is shorter than the C—S single bond, and the methyl group is coplanar with the xanthate group. In the crystal pairs of mol­ecules form dimers through inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding.

Related literature

For a related structure, see: Xiao & Charpentier (2010 ▶). For the design and applications of the title compound, see: Moad et al. (2005 ▶, 2008 ▶); Stenzel et al. (2003 ▶); Coote & Radom (2004 ▶); Coote et al. (2006 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0o575-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C4H6O3S2

  • M r = 166.21

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.1009 (3) Å

  • b = 10.6485 (5) Å

  • c = 9.2022 (4) Å

  • β = 93.370 (1)°

  • V = 694.61 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.70 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.10 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.931, T max = 0.963

  • 33976 measured reflections

  • 1723 independent reflections

  • 1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.038

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021

  • wR(F 2) = 0.056

  • S = 1.05

  • 1723 reflections

  • 84 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811003941/ng5085sup1.cif

e-67-0o575-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811003941/ng5085Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o575-Isup2.hkl (84.9KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O3i 0.84 1.82 2.6540 (12) 175

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Idea to Innovation (I2I) Program. The authors are grateful to Dr Guerman Popov of the Department of Chemistry, the University of Western Ontario, for the XRD data acquisition and inter­pretation.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Carbonothioylthio (S=C—S) compounds are used as chain transfer agents (CTA) in addition-fragmentation chain-transfer (RAFT) polymerization. In the addition-fragmentation equilibria, addition of the propagating radicals to the S=C group followed by fragmentation of the intermediate radical at the C—S bond generates a new radical and a polymeric carbonothioylthio compound (Moad et al., 2005, 2008). O-alkyl xanthates show low reactivity in RAFT equilibria due to the conjugation of the O lone pair electrons and the C=S bond which is favorable to the zwitterionic canonical forms of xanthates (Moad et al., 2005; Coote et al., 2006). However, xanthates can promote fragmentation of unstable radicals, such as vinyl acetate radicals that undergo fast addition and slow fragmentation (Coote et al., 2006). Though studies have been done on RAFT polymerization of vinyl acetate with methyl 2-(methoxycarbonothioylthio)acetate (Stenzel et al., 2003; Coote & Radom, 2004), 2-(methoxycarbonothioylthio)acetic acid has not been used in RAFT polymerization. Therefore, efforts were made to use 2-(methoxycarbonothioylthio)acetic acid as the CTA in RAFT polymerization, and poly(vinyl acetate)s containing carboxylic acid end groups were successfully prepared. A similar compound, 2-(isopropoxycarbonothioylthio)acetic acid, has been reported for the same application (Xiao & Charpentier, 2010).

Experimental

Potassium hydroxide 5.6 g (50 mmol) was dissolved in methanol 30 ml at room temperature. The solution was cooled with an ice bath when carbon disulfide 20 ml was charged into the flask dropwise. After 1 day reaction at room temperature, a solution of 2-bromoacetic acid 6.9 g (50 mmol) / methanol 20 ml was added into the flask dropwise in an ice bath. The precipitates were removed by filtration after 2 days reaction at room temperature, and the solvent was evaporated with a rotary evaporator. The crude product was run through a silica gel column with a mixture of ethyl ether / hexanes (5:1). Colorless crystals were obtained from crystalization in hexanes/ cyclohexane (4:1). m.p.: 112.6 °C (DSC). MS: 165.9764.

Refinement

The structure was solved and refined using the Bruker SHELXTL Software Package, using the space group P 1 21/c 1, with Z = 4 for the formula unit, C4H6O3S2. All of the non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal parameters. The hydrogen atom positions were calculated geometrically and were included as riding on their respective carbon/oxygen atoms. The final anisotropic full-matrix least-squares refinement on F2 with 84 variables converged at R1 = 2.13%, for the observed data and wR2 = 5.55% for all data. The goodness-of-fit was 1.047. The largest peak in the final difference electron density synthesis was 0.288 e-/Å3 and the largest hole was -0.195 e-/Å3 with an RMS deviation of 0.040 e-/Å3. On the basis of the final model, the calculated density was 1.589 g/cm3 and F(000), 344 e-.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

View of the title compound (50% probability displacement ellipsoids).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the structure with H-bonds.

Crystal data

C4H6O3S2 F(000) = 344
Mr = 166.21 Dx = 1.589 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 9941 reflections
a = 7.1009 (3) Å θ = 2.9–30.2°
b = 10.6485 (5) Å µ = 0.70 mm−1
c = 9.2022 (4) Å T = 150 K
β = 93.370 (1)° Block, colourless
V = 694.61 (5) Å3 0.10 × 0.07 × 0.06 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1723 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1517 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.038
φ and ω scans θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.931, Tmax = 0.963 k = −14→13
33976 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.056 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0234P)2 + 0.2541P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1723 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
84 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.15918 (5) 0.31498 (3) 0.78725 (4) 0.02980 (9)
S2 −0.11784 (5) 0.12843 (3) 0.90015 (4) 0.03122 (9)
O1 −0.10815 (13) 0.37609 (8) 0.93394 (10) 0.0311 (2)
O2 0.41851 (14) −0.01297 (9) 0.81022 (10) 0.0319 (2)
H2 0.4754 −0.0511 0.8797 0.048*
O3 0.38409 (12) 0.13435 (8) 0.98001 (9) 0.02570 (19)
C1 −0.2814 (2) 0.36782 (14) 1.00825 (15) 0.0354 (3)
H1A −0.3839 0.3404 0.9395 0.053*
H1B −0.3120 0.4504 1.0476 0.053*
H1C −0.2659 0.3070 1.0880 0.053*
C2 −0.03785 (16) 0.27021 (11) 0.88181 (13) 0.0233 (2)
C3 0.25018 (18) 0.16615 (12) 0.73538 (13) 0.0279 (3)
H3A 0.1438 0.1134 0.6969 0.034*
H3B 0.3354 0.1794 0.6554 0.034*
C4 0.35645 (16) 0.09552 (11) 0.85644 (13) 0.0224 (2)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.03072 (17) 0.02100 (15) 0.03800 (18) 0.00050 (12) 0.00457 (13) 0.00871 (12)
S2 0.03306 (17) 0.02151 (16) 0.03927 (19) −0.00432 (12) 0.00377 (13) 0.00243 (12)
O1 0.0293 (5) 0.0230 (4) 0.0407 (5) 0.0011 (3) 0.0005 (4) −0.0062 (4)
O2 0.0404 (5) 0.0291 (5) 0.0252 (4) 0.0120 (4) −0.0050 (4) −0.0049 (4)
O3 0.0264 (4) 0.0255 (4) 0.0248 (4) 0.0046 (3) −0.0011 (3) −0.0034 (3)
C1 0.0337 (7) 0.0385 (7) 0.0339 (7) 0.0061 (6) 0.0026 (6) −0.0058 (6)
C2 0.0245 (6) 0.0223 (6) 0.0224 (5) 0.0007 (4) −0.0060 (4) 0.0009 (4)
C3 0.0317 (6) 0.0281 (6) 0.0242 (6) 0.0041 (5) 0.0040 (5) 0.0041 (5)
C4 0.0195 (5) 0.0226 (5) 0.0254 (6) −0.0001 (4) 0.0040 (4) 0.0005 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C2 1.7564 (13) O3—C4 1.2150 (14)
S1—C3 1.7870 (13) C1—H1A 0.9800
S2—C2 1.6253 (12) C1—H1B 0.9800
O1—C2 1.3336 (15) C1—H1C 0.9800
O1—C1 1.4451 (17) C3—C4 1.5091 (16)
O2—C4 1.3159 (14) C3—H3A 0.9900
O2—H2 0.8400 C3—H3B 0.9900
C2—S1—C3 101.69 (6) S2—C2—S1 126.65 (7)
C2—O1—C1 117.76 (10) C4—C3—S1 114.70 (9)
C4—O2—H2 109.5 C4—C3—H3A 108.6
O1—C1—H1A 109.5 S1—C3—H3A 108.6
O1—C1—H1B 109.5 C4—C3—H3B 108.6
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 S1—C3—H3B 108.6
O1—C1—H1C 109.5 H3A—C3—H3B 107.6
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 O3—C4—O2 124.23 (11)
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 O3—C4—C3 124.58 (11)
O1—C2—S2 127.40 (10) O2—C4—C3 111.18 (10)
O1—C2—S1 105.94 (8)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2···O3i 0.84 1.82 2.6540 (12) 175

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG5085).

References

  1. Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Coote, M. L., Izgorodina, E. I., Cavigliasso, G. E., Roth, M., Busch, M. & Barner-Kowollik, C. (2006). Macromolecules, 39, 4585–4591.
  3. Coote, M. L. & Radom, L. (2004). Macromolecules, 37, 590–596.
  4. Moad, G., Rizzardo, E. & Thang, S. H. (2005). Aust. J. Chem. 58, 379–410.
  5. Moad, G., Rizzardo, E. & Thang, S. H. (2008). Polymer, 49, 1079–1131.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Stenzel, M. H., Cummins, L., Roberts, G. E., Davis, T. P., Vana, P. & Barner-Kowollik, C. (2003). Macromol. Chem. Phys. 204, 1160–1168.
  9. Xiao, S. & Charpentier, P. A. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o3103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811003941/ng5085sup1.cif

e-67-0o575-sup1.cif (12.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811003941/ng5085Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o575-Isup2.hkl (84.9KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES