Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Feb 12;67(Pt 3):m333. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811004636

4-s-cis-1,3-Butadiene)tetra­carbonyl­chromium(0)

Guido J Reiss a,*, Maik Finze a
PMCID: PMC3052012  PMID: 21522264

Abstract

In the title complex, [Cr(C4H6)(CO)4], the Cr0 atom shows a distorted octa­hedral environment from four C atoms of the carbonyl ligands and the two π-bonds of the s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand. The complex has an approximate non-crystallographic mirror symmetry m passing through the chromium atom, two carbonyl ligands and the mid-point of the central C—C bond of the s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand. The C—C bond lengths in the s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand alternate, the terminal distances being shorter than the central distance.

Related literature

For experimental and theoretical data for the title compound, see: Fischler et al. (1976); Kotzian et al. (1982); Kreiter & Özkar (1978); Okamoto et al. (1991); von Ragué Schleyer et al. (2000). For related chromium complexes, see: Pavkovic & Zaluzec (1989), Betz et al. (1993), Wang et al. (1990), Konietzny et al. (2010). For related s-cis-butadiene complexes, see: Reiss (2010), Reiss & Konietzny (2002).graphic file with name e-67-0m333-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cr(C4H6)(CO)4]

  • M r = 218.13

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.4011 (8) Å

  • b = 6.7666 (8) Å

  • c = 11.0642 (10) Å

  • α = 84.728 (7)°

  • β = 81.840 (8)°

  • γ = 69.127 (8)°

  • V = 442.80 (8) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.27 mm−1

  • T = 137 K

  • 0.38 × 0.26 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) T min = 0.711, T max = 0.946

  • 2829 measured reflections

  • 1735 independent reflections

  • 1498 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.020

  • 3 standard reflections every 60 min intensity decay: none

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.028

  • wR(F 2) = 0.068

  • S = 1.05

  • 1735 reflections

  • 140 parameters

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004636/si2332sup1.cif

e-67-0m333-sup1.cif (14.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004636/si2332Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m333-Isup2.hkl (85.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Cr1—C5 1.852 (2)
Cr1—C6 1.887 (2)
Cr1—C7 1.873 (2)
Cr1—C8 1.914 (2)
Cr1—C1 2.312 (2)
Cr1—C2 2.184 (2)
Cr1—C3 2.190 (2)
Cr1—C4 2.325 (2)
C1—C2 1.379 (3)
C2—C3 1.436 (3)
C3—C4 1.371 (3)

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Simple butadiene complexes of transition metals are of general interest because they are model systems that allow a deeper understanding of the bonding situation between transition metal centers and olefins that play an important role for example in catalysis. [Cr(C4H6)(CO)4] that was first described in the 70s of the last century (Fischler et al. 1976) was subject to a number of spectroscopic (Kotzian et al. 1982) as well as theoretical studies (von Ragué Schleyer et al. 2000) and its chemistry was investigated (Kreiter & Özkar, 1978; Okamoto et al. 1991) with the focus on photochemical ligand exchange reactions (Fischler et al. 1976).

The coordination at Cr(0) in the title compound is best described as a distorted octahedron formed by four carbonyl ligands and one s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand. The Cr–CO distances of the carbonyl ligands that are trans to the s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand are slightly shorter than the two other Cr–CO distances (Table 1). This finding is in good agreement to Cr—CO distances in the structure of the related tetracarbonyl chromium(0) complex [Cr(C19H23NO2)(CO)4]: d(Cr–COtrans) = 1.884 (4), 1.887 (6) Å and d(Cr–CO) = 1.847 (5), 1.837 (4) Å (Pavkovic & Zaluzec, 1989). In the structure of the title complex the Cr–C distances to the terminal carbon atoms of the s-cis-1,3-butadiene ligand are longer compared to the respective distances to the central carbon atoms of the diene ligand. A similar trend to longer Cr–C distances for the terminal carbon atoms was found for example for the s-cis-1,3-butadiene chromium(1) complex [CrCp*(C4H6)(CO)] (Betz et al. 1993). As known from a few other chromium(0) complexes of s-cis-1,3-butadiene and related coordination compounds (Pavkovic & Zaluzec, 1989; Betz et al. 1993; Wang et al. 1990; Konietzny et al. 2010) in [Cr(C4H6)(CO)4] the terminal C–C distances are significantly shorter than the central d(C–C) Δ(d(C–C)) = 0.057–0.065 Å. In contrast, for comparable iron(0) and manganese(0) complexes almost equilibrated C–C distances have been reported (Reiss, 2010; Reiss & Konietzny 2002), e. g. in the structure of the s-cis-1,3-butadiene iron(0) complex [Fe(C4H6)(CO)3] Δ(d(C–C)) = 0.005 Å [d(C–C)central = 1.4142 (19) Å, d(C–C)terminal = 1.4194 (14) Å] (Reiss, 2010).

Experimental

Synthesis

[Cr(C4H6)(CO)4] was synthesized according to a published procedure (Fischler, 1976). The crystal was obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of pentane.

Refinement

All hydrogen atoms were located from difference Fourier synthesis. For the terminal H atom pairs of the CH2 groups common Uiso(H) = 0.031 (4)/0.027 (4) Å2 and individual Uiso(H) = 0.027 (6) and 0.019 (5) Å2 for the two central H atoms were refined freely with distances in the range 0.90 (2) - 0.98 (3) Å.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Hydrogen atoms are drawn with an arbitrary radius and the displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

Crystal data

[Cr(C4H6)(CO)4] Z = 2
Mr = 218.13 F(000) = 220
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.636 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.4011 (8) Å Cell parameters from 2257 reflections
b = 6.7666 (8) Å θ = 3.4–28.7°
c = 11.0642 (10) Å µ = 1.27 mm1
α = 84.728 (7)° T = 137 K
β = 81.840 (8)° Platelet, yellow
γ = 69.127 (8)° 0.38 × 0.26 × 0.04 mm
V = 442.80 (8) Å3

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer 1498 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.020
graphite θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 4.1°
ω scans h = −7→7
Absorption correction: gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009) k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.711, Tmax = 0.946 l = −13→13
2829 measured reflections 3 standard reflections every 60 min
1735 independent reflections intensity decay: none

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.068 All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.04P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1735 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
140 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.38 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. A single-crystal suitable for structure determination was harvested under a dry nitrogen atmosphere and was directly transferred into the cooling stream of an Oxford-Xcalibur diffractometer equipped with an EOS-CCD detector. CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.33.52 (release 06–11-2009). Numerical absorption correction based on Gaussian integration over a multifaceted crystal model.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cr1 0.66351 (5) 0.59871 (5) 0.74506 (3) 0.01600 (12)
O6 0.8591 (3) 0.2852 (3) 0.94893 (13) 0.0342 (4)
C6 0.7852 (3) 0.4125 (3) 0.87540 (17) 0.0212 (4)
O5 0.3023 (3) 0.4055 (2) 0.79702 (16) 0.0342 (4)
O8 0.4722 (3) 0.7542 (3) 0.50255 (13) 0.0329 (4)
C8 0.5444 (3) 0.7032 (3) 0.59328 (18) 0.0222 (4)
C5 0.4434 (3) 0.4763 (3) 0.77460 (18) 0.0216 (4)
O7 1.0248 (3) 0.2629 (3) 0.59598 (14) 0.0329 (4)
C7 0.8870 (3) 0.3908 (3) 0.65151 (18) 0.0222 (4)
C3 0.8024 (4) 0.8098 (3) 0.81772 (19) 0.0258 (5)
H3 0.921 (4) 0.746 (4) 0.864 (2) 0.027 (6)*
C2 0.5762 (4) 0.8487 (3) 0.8746 (2) 0.0269 (5)
H2 0.556 (3) 0.811 (3) 0.955 (2) 0.019 (5)*
C1 0.3978 (4) 0.9184 (4) 0.8059 (2) 0.0287 (5)
H12 0.403 (4) 1.009 (4) 0.732 (2) 0.031 (4)*
H11 0.261 (4) 0.918 (4) 0.846 (2) 0.031 (4)*
C4 0.8493 (4) 0.8394 (4) 0.6940 (2) 0.0282 (5)
H41 0.748 (4) 0.940 (4) 0.647 (2) 0.027 (4)*
H42 0.995 (4) 0.789 (4) 0.655 (2) 0.027 (4)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cr1 0.01916 (18) 0.01729 (18) 0.01228 (17) −0.00607 (13) −0.00425 (11) −0.00170 (12)
O6 0.0401 (9) 0.0363 (10) 0.0225 (8) −0.0080 (8) −0.0115 (7) 0.0083 (7)
C6 0.0233 (10) 0.0242 (11) 0.0161 (10) −0.0078 (9) −0.0006 (8) −0.0052 (9)
O5 0.0282 (8) 0.0266 (9) 0.0510 (10) −0.0139 (7) −0.0031 (7) −0.0027 (8)
O8 0.0432 (9) 0.0350 (9) 0.0230 (8) −0.0128 (8) −0.0179 (7) 0.0042 (7)
C8 0.0234 (10) 0.0225 (11) 0.0223 (11) −0.0089 (9) −0.0038 (8) −0.0034 (9)
C5 0.0233 (10) 0.0165 (10) 0.0222 (10) −0.0017 (9) −0.0065 (8) −0.0023 (8)
O7 0.0317 (9) 0.0334 (9) 0.0260 (8) −0.0027 (7) 0.0040 (7) −0.0098 (7)
C7 0.0258 (11) 0.0263 (11) 0.0171 (10) −0.0113 (9) −0.0066 (8) 0.0025 (9)
C3 0.0335 (12) 0.0233 (11) 0.0266 (11) −0.0133 (10) −0.0142 (9) −0.0010 (9)
C2 0.0429 (13) 0.0194 (11) 0.0200 (11) −0.0111 (10) −0.0045 (9) −0.0073 (9)
C1 0.0309 (12) 0.0188 (11) 0.0339 (13) −0.0047 (9) −0.0013 (10) −0.0080 (10)
C4 0.0312 (13) 0.0305 (13) 0.0302 (12) −0.0189 (11) −0.0080 (10) 0.0021 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cr1—C5 1.852 (2) O8—C8 1.138 (2)
Cr1—C6 1.887 (2) C1—C2 1.379 (3)
Cr1—C7 1.873 (2) C2—C3 1.436 (3)
Cr1—C8 1.914 (2) C3—C4 1.371 (3)
Cr1—C1 2.312 (2) C1—H11 0.92 (2)
Cr1—C2 2.184 (2) C1—H12 0.98 (3)
Cr1—C3 2.190 (2) C2—H2 0.90 (2)
Cr1—C4 2.325 (2) C3—H3 0.92 (2)
O5—C5 1.153 (3) C4—H41 0.93 (3)
O6—C6 1.148 (3) C4—H42 0.93 (3)
O7—C7 1.142 (3)
C5—Cr1—C6 83.10 (9) C2—C3—C4 121.6 (2)
C5—Cr1—C7 99.88 (9) C2—C1—H11 116.0 (15)
C7—Cr1—C6 82.30 (8) C2—C1—H12 120.2 (14)
C5—Cr1—C8 85.80 (9) C1—C2—H2 120.7 (14)
C7—Cr1—C8 84.94 (9) C3—C2—H2 118.0 (14)
C6—Cr1—C8 161.38 (9) C4—C3—H3 118.6 (15)
O6—C6—Cr1 174.03 (18) C2—C3—H3 119.2 (15)
O8—C8—Cr1 176.01 (19) C3—C4—H41 122.7 (15)
O5—C5—Cr1 177.16 (18) C3—C4—H42 121.8 (15)
O7—C7—Cr1 178.99 (18) H12—C1—H11 120 (2)
C1—C2—C3 120.8 (2) H41—C4—H42 114 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C1 −0.3 (3)

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: SI2332).

References

  1. Betz, P., Döhring, A., Emrich, R., Goddard, R., Jolly, P. W., Krüger, C., Romão, C. C., Schönfelder, K. U. & Tsay, Y.-H. (1993). Polyhedron, 12, 2651–2662.
  2. Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Fischler, M., Budzwait, M. & Koerner von Gustorf, E. A. (1976). J. Organomet. Chem. 105, 325–330.
  4. Konietzny, S., Finze, M. & Reiss, G. J. (2010). J. Organomet. Chem. 695, 2089–2092.
  5. Kotzian, M., Kreiter, C. G. & Özkar, S. (1982). J. Organomet. Chem. 229, 29–42.
  6. Kreiter, C. G. & Özkar, S. (1978). J. Organomet. Chem. 152, C13–C18.
  7. Okamoto, Y., Inui, Y., Onimatsu, H. & Imanaka, T. (1991). J. Phys. Chem. 95, 4596–4598.
  8. Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.
  9. Pavkovic, S. F. & Zaluzec, E. J. (1989). Acta Cryst. C45, 18–21.
  10. Ragué Schleyer, P. von, Kiran, B., Simion, D. V. & Sorensen, T. S. (2000). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 510–513.
  11. Reiss, G. J. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Reiss, G. J. & Konietzny, S. (2002). Dalton Trans. pp. 862–864.
  13. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, N.-F., Wink, D. J. & Dewan, J. C. (1990). Organometallics, 9, 335–340.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004636/si2332sup1.cif

e-67-0m333-sup1.cif (14.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004636/si2332Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m333-Isup2.hkl (85.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES