Abstract
The cation of the title salt, C8H10NO+·Cl−, is essentially planar [C—C—C—C torsion angle = 4.6 (2)°], the conformation being stabilized by an intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond. In the crystal, centrosymmetric aggregates are formed via N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds. These dimeric aggregates are sustained in the crystal packing by a combination of C—H⋯Cl, C—H⋯O and C—O⋯π [O⋯ring centroid(benzene ring) = 3.1871 (13) and 3.3787 (13) Å] interactions.
Related literature
For background to structural studies of quinoline derivatives, see: Kaiser et al. (2009 ▶).
Experimental
Crystal data
C8H10NO+·Cl−
M r = 171.62
Monoclinic,
a = 4.8979 (1) Å
b = 15.8136 (4) Å
c = 10.8203 (3) Å
β = 102.569 (3)°
V = 817.98 (3) Å3
Z = 4
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.41 mm−1
T = 100 K
0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection
Agilent Supernova Dual diffractometer with an Atlas detector
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.920, T max = 1.000
3262 measured reflections
1436 independent reflections
1256 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R int = 0.019
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029
wR(F 2) = 0.080
S = 1.07
1436 reflections
113 parameters
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3
Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004739/hg2797sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004739/hg2797Isup2.hkl
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).
| D—H⋯A | D—H | H⋯A | D⋯A | D—H⋯A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1—H1n⋯Cl1 | 0.95 (2) | 2.23 (2) | 3.1463 (15) | 163 (2) |
| N1—H2n⋯Cl1i | 0.92 (2) | 2.24 (2) | 3.1366 (15) | 165 (2) |
| N1—H3n⋯O1 | 0.87 (2) | 1.95 (2) | 2.6778 (18) | 140 (2) |
| C5—H5⋯Cl1ii | 0.95 | 2.73 | 3.5332 (18) | 142 |
| C6—H6⋯O1iii | 0.95 | 2.59 | 3.2496 (19) | 127 |
Symmetry codes: (i)
; (ii)
; (iii)
.
Acknowledgments
PB acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, for a research grant (SR/FTP/CS-57/2007). The authors thank the University of Malaya for supporting this study.
supplementary crystallographic information
Comment
The title salt, (I), was obtained as an unexpected product during the attempted synthesis of a quinoline derivative, investigated as a part of an on-going programme into the synthesis and structural chemistry of quinolines of interest owing to their putative anti-malarial activity (Kaiser et al., 2009).
Ionic (I), Fig. 1, comprises a 2-acetylanilinium cation and a chloride anion. The cation is essentially planar with the acetyl group only slightly twisted out of the plane of the benzene ring to which it is connected, the C1–C2–C3–C4 torsion angle = 4.6 (2) °. The observed conformation is stabilized by an intramolecular N–H···O hydrogen bond, Table 1.
In the crystal packing, centrosymmetrically related molecules are connected into a supramolecular dimer via N–H···Cl hydrogen bonds, Table 1 and Fig. 2. The dimeric aggregates are arranged into layers in the ac plane via a combination of C–H···O, Table 1, and C—O···π contacts [C2–O1···Cg(C3—C8)i = 3.1871 (13) Å with the angle at O1 = 96.44 (10) ° for i: 1 + x, y, z; and C2–O1···Cg(C3—C8)ii = 3.3787 (13) Å with the angle at O1 = 98.36 (9) ° for ii: x, 1/2 - y, -1/2 + z]. The presence of C–H···Cl interactions, Table 1, contributes to the stability of the structure along the b axis, Fig. 3.
Experimental
A mixture of 2-aminoacetophenone (0.01 M), acetophenone (0.01 M) and a catalytic amount of conc. HCl was heated on a water bath for 10 min. The resultant solid was filtered, dried and purified by column chromatography using a 1:5 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane. Re-crystallization was by slow evaporation of an acetone solution of (I) which yielded colourless needles. M.pt. 421–423 K. Yield: 66%. The X-ray study showed that the original 2-aminoacetophenone had been protonated and crystallized as a chloride salt.
Refinement
Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H 0.95 to 0.98 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2 to 1.5Uequiv(C). The N-bound H-atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely.
Figures
Fig. 1.
The constituent ions of salt (I) showing the atom-labelling scheme and displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.
Fig. 2.

Supramolecular dimer in (I) mediated by N–H···Cl hydrogen bonding, shown as orange dashed lines.
Fig. 3.
Unit-cell contents shown in projection down the a axis in (I). The N–H···Cl hydrogen bonding, and C–H···Cl, C–H···O and C–O···π contacts are shown as orange, blue, pink, and purple dashed lines, respectively.
Crystal data
| C8H10NO+·Cl− | F(000) = 360 |
| Mr = 171.62 | Dx = 1.394 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 2016 reflections |
| a = 4.8979 (1) Å | θ = 2.3–29.1° |
| b = 15.8136 (4) Å | µ = 0.41 mm−1 |
| c = 10.8203 (3) Å | T = 100 K |
| β = 102.569 (3)° | Pris,, colourless |
| V = 817.98 (3) Å3 | 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm |
| Z = 4 |
Data collection
| Agilent Supernova Dual diffractometer with an Atlas detector | 1436 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: SuperNova (Mo) X-ray Source | 1256 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Mirror | Rint = 0.019 |
| Detector resolution: 10.4041 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3° |
| ω scans | h = −5→5 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010) | k = −18→17 |
| Tmin = 0.920, Tmax = 1.000 | l = −10→12 |
| 3262 measured reflections |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.080 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
| S = 1.07 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0393P)2 + 0.2093P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 1436 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| 113 parameters | Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 |
Special details
| Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Cl1 | 0.10927 (9) | 0.47141 (2) | 0.83017 (4) | 0.02647 (17) | |
| O1 | 0.8706 (2) | 0.23737 (7) | 0.91735 (11) | 0.0277 (3) | |
| N1 | 0.6529 (3) | 0.38178 (9) | 0.98223 (14) | 0.0210 (3) | |
| H1N | 0.508 (4) | 0.4081 (12) | 0.9220 (19) | 0.036 (5)* | |
| H2N | 0.753 (4) | 0.4233 (13) | 1.0322 (19) | 0.033 (5)* | |
| H3N | 0.759 (4) | 0.3532 (12) | 0.9418 (19) | 0.034 (5)* | |
| C1 | 0.7572 (5) | 0.10071 (11) | 0.97971 (19) | 0.0377 (5) | |
| H1A | 0.8665 | 0.0826 | 0.9186 | 0.057* | |
| H1B | 0.5674 | 0.0776 | 0.9552 | 0.057* | |
| H1C | 0.8466 | 0.0800 | 1.0642 | 0.057* | |
| C2 | 0.7435 (3) | 0.19573 (10) | 0.98154 (15) | 0.0233 (4) | |
| C3 | 0.5701 (3) | 0.23753 (10) | 1.06204 (15) | 0.0197 (4) | |
| C4 | 0.4392 (4) | 0.18953 (10) | 1.14121 (16) | 0.0238 (4) | |
| H4 | 0.4639 | 0.1299 | 1.1444 | 0.029* | |
| C5 | 0.2751 (4) | 0.22678 (11) | 1.21474 (16) | 0.0253 (4) | |
| H5 | 0.1875 | 0.1928 | 1.2673 | 0.030* | |
| C6 | 0.2381 (3) | 0.31345 (10) | 1.21206 (16) | 0.0240 (4) | |
| H6 | 0.1249 | 0.3391 | 1.2626 | 0.029* | |
| C7 | 0.3663 (3) | 0.36268 (10) | 1.13559 (15) | 0.0219 (4) | |
| H7 | 0.3423 | 0.4223 | 1.1337 | 0.026* | |
| C8 | 0.5289 (3) | 0.32504 (10) | 1.06211 (15) | 0.0185 (4) |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Cl1 | 0.0285 (3) | 0.0215 (3) | 0.0298 (3) | 0.00177 (17) | 0.00704 (19) | −0.00224 (17) |
| O1 | 0.0280 (7) | 0.0299 (7) | 0.0275 (7) | 0.0043 (5) | 0.0113 (6) | −0.0002 (5) |
| N1 | 0.0222 (8) | 0.0193 (8) | 0.0235 (8) | −0.0005 (7) | 0.0091 (7) | 0.0013 (7) |
| C1 | 0.0527 (13) | 0.0241 (10) | 0.0401 (12) | 0.0081 (9) | 0.0182 (10) | −0.0017 (9) |
| C2 | 0.0230 (9) | 0.0236 (9) | 0.0212 (9) | 0.0040 (7) | 0.0003 (7) | −0.0008 (7) |
| C3 | 0.0173 (8) | 0.0210 (9) | 0.0199 (8) | 0.0010 (7) | 0.0016 (7) | 0.0006 (7) |
| C4 | 0.0251 (9) | 0.0188 (9) | 0.0262 (9) | 0.0001 (7) | 0.0027 (7) | 0.0048 (7) |
| C5 | 0.0226 (9) | 0.0300 (10) | 0.0238 (9) | −0.0034 (8) | 0.0060 (7) | 0.0067 (8) |
| C6 | 0.0196 (9) | 0.0304 (10) | 0.0232 (9) | 0.0015 (7) | 0.0073 (7) | −0.0005 (8) |
| C7 | 0.0205 (9) | 0.0191 (9) | 0.0264 (9) | 0.0015 (7) | 0.0058 (7) | −0.0005 (7) |
| C8 | 0.0158 (8) | 0.0205 (8) | 0.0190 (8) | −0.0017 (6) | 0.0031 (7) | 0.0017 (7) |
Geometric parameters (Å, °)
| O1—C2 | 1.221 (2) | C3—C8 | 1.399 (2) |
| N1—C8 | 1.466 (2) | C3—C4 | 1.400 (2) |
| N1—H1N | 0.95 (2) | C4—C5 | 1.380 (2) |
| N1—H2N | 0.92 (2) | C4—H4 | 0.9500 |
| N1—H3N | 0.87 (2) | C5—C6 | 1.382 (2) |
| C1—C2 | 1.504 (2) | C5—H5 | 0.9500 |
| C1—H1A | 0.9800 | C6—C7 | 1.383 (2) |
| C1—H1B | 0.9800 | C6—H6 | 0.9500 |
| C1—H1C | 0.9800 | C7—C8 | 1.377 (2) |
| C2—C3 | 1.496 (2) | C7—H7 | 0.9500 |
| C8—N1—H1N | 109.3 (12) | C4—C3—C2 | 120.68 (15) |
| C8—N1—H2N | 108.9 (12) | C5—C4—C3 | 121.54 (15) |
| H1N—N1—H2N | 108.2 (16) | C5—C4—H4 | 119.2 |
| C8—N1—H3N | 110.2 (13) | C3—C4—H4 | 119.2 |
| H1N—N1—H3N | 108.7 (18) | C4—C5—C6 | 120.10 (16) |
| H2N—N1—H3N | 111.5 (18) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.0 |
| C2—C1—H1A | 109.5 | C6—C5—H5 | 120.0 |
| C2—C1—H1B | 109.5 | C5—C6—C7 | 119.76 (16) |
| H1A—C1—H1B | 109.5 | C5—C6—H6 | 120.1 |
| C2—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C7—C6—H6 | 120.1 |
| H1A—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C8—C7—C6 | 119.82 (15) |
| H1B—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C8—C7—H7 | 120.1 |
| O1—C2—C3 | 121.12 (15) | C6—C7—H7 | 120.1 |
| O1—C2—C1 | 120.10 (16) | C7—C8—C3 | 121.98 (15) |
| C3—C2—C1 | 118.77 (15) | C7—C8—N1 | 116.21 (14) |
| C8—C3—C4 | 116.80 (15) | C3—C8—N1 | 121.80 (14) |
| C8—C3—C2 | 122.52 (14) | ||
| O1—C2—C3—C8 | 4.3 (2) | C5—C6—C7—C8 | 0.3 (2) |
| C1—C2—C3—C8 | −175.12 (16) | C6—C7—C8—C3 | −0.1 (2) |
| O1—C2—C3—C4 | −176.05 (15) | C6—C7—C8—N1 | 178.95 (14) |
| C1—C2—C3—C4 | 4.6 (2) | C4—C3—C8—C7 | −0.4 (2) |
| C8—C3—C4—C5 | 0.7 (2) | C2—C3—C8—C7 | 179.28 (15) |
| C2—C3—C4—C5 | −179.04 (15) | C4—C3—C8—N1 | −179.37 (15) |
| C3—C4—C5—C6 | −0.4 (3) | C2—C3—C8—N1 | 0.3 (2) |
| C4—C5—C6—C7 | −0.1 (3) |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N1—H1n···Cl1 | 0.95 (2) | 2.23 (2) | 3.1463 (15) | 162.9 (17) |
| N1—H2n···Cl1i | 0.92 (2) | 2.24 (2) | 3.1366 (15) | 165.0 (17) |
| N1—H3n···O1 | 0.87 (2) | 1.946 (19) | 2.6778 (18) | 140.3 (18) |
| C5—H5···Cl1ii | 0.95 | 2.73 | 3.5332 (18) | 142 |
| C6—H6···O1iii | 0.95 | 2.59 | 3.2496 (19) | 127 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x−1, −y+1/2, z+1/2.
Footnotes
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HG2797).
References
- Agilent (2010). CrysAlis PRO Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England.
- Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
- Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
- Kaiser, C. R., Pais, K. C., de Souza, M. V. N., Wardell, J. L., Wardell, S. M. S. V. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 1133–1140.
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004739/hg2797sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004739/hg2797Isup2.hkl
Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


