Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Feb 23;67(Pt 3):m357–m358. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811005447

Poly[[triaqua­(μ3-4-oxidopyridine-2,6-dicarboxyl­ato)terbium(III)] monohydrate]

Dong-Yu Lv a,*, Zhu-Qing Gao b, Jin-Zhong Gu a
PMCID: PMC3052142  PMID: 21522284

Abstract

In the title coordination polymer, {[Tb(C7H2NO5)(H2O)3]·H2O}n, the TbIII atom is eight-coordinated by a tridentate 4-oxidopyridine-2,6-dicarboxyl­ate trianion, two adjacent monodentate anions and three water mol­ecules, forming a distorted bicapped trigonal–prismatic TbNO7 coordination environment. The anions bridge adjacent TbIII ions into double chains. Adjacent chains are further connected into sheets parallel to (10Inline graphic). O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving both coordinated and uncoordinated water mol­ecules generate a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For structures and properties of luminescent lanthanide coordination compounds, see: Kustaryono et al. (2010 ▶); He et al. (2010 ▶); Li et al. (2008 ▶); Luo et al. (2008 ▶). For the use of multi-carboxyl­ate and heterocyclic acids in coordination chemistry, see: Li et al. (2008 ▶); Luo et al. (2008 ▶). For the dicarboxyl­ate ligand 4-oxido-pyridine-2,6-dicarboxyl­ate, see: Gao et al. (2008 ▶). For the isotypic structures of the Dy and Eu analogues, see: Gao et al. (2006 ▶) and Lv et al. (2010 ▶), respectively. For bond lengths and angles in other complexes with eight-coordinate TbIII, see: Chen et al. (2008 ▶); Ramya et al. (2010 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0m357-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Tb(C7H2NO5)(H2O)3]·H2O

  • M r = 411.08

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.953 (2) Å

  • b = 7.5454 (16) Å

  • c = 15.461 (3) Å

  • β = 105.126 (2)°

  • V = 1120.9 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 6.35 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.22 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.162, T max = 0.247

  • 7828 measured reflections

  • 2080 independent reflections

  • 1929 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.032

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.019

  • wR(F 2) = 0.051

  • S = 1.10

  • 2080 reflections

  • 196 parameters

  • 12 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 1.34 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005447/wm2449sup1.cif

e-67-0m357-sup1.cif (16.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005447/wm2449Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m357-Isup2.hkl (102.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected bond lengths (Å).

Tb1—O5i 2.3035 (19)
Tb1—O8 2.368 (2)
Tb1—O6 2.383 (2)
Tb1—O4ii 2.4106 (19)
Tb1—O3 2.415 (2)
Tb1—O7 2.416 (2)
Tb1—O1 2.424 (2)
Tb1—N1 2.471 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Table 2. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O6—H1W⋯O1iii 0.85 (4) 2.10 (3) 2.799 (3) 139 (3)
O6—H2W⋯O5iv 0.86 (4) 1.93 (3) 2.725 (3) 154 (3)
O7—H3W⋯O9v 0.88 (2) 1.84 (2) 2.687 (3) 162 (4)
O7—H4W⋯O9 0.85 (4) 2.23 (3) 2.995 (4) 151 (3)
O8—H5W⋯O2vi 0.85 (2) 1.85 (2) 2.693 (3) 175 (4)
O8—H6W⋯O3ii 0.85 (4) 1.85 (4) 2.680 (3) 167 (4)
O9—H7W⋯O2vii 0.86 (4) 1.84 (2) 2.699 (3) 175 (4)
O9—H8W⋯O4i 0.85 (4) 2.37 (4) 3.073 (4) 141 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic; (v) Inline graphic; (vi) Inline graphic; (vii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The design and synthesis of luminescent lanthanide coordination polymers have achieved great progress during the last years owing to their potential applications in biomedical imaging, as luminescent sensors or as fluorescent probes (Kustaryono et al., 2010; He et al., 2010). Eu and Tb are the most useful lanthanides due to their good fluorescence properties (Li et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2008). Many multi-carboxylate or heterocylic carboxylic acids are used for designing such materials (Li et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2008). For lanthanide coordination polymers, 4-hydroxy-pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid is an excellent bridging pyridine dicarboxylate ligand (Lv et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2008), which can provide at most one nitrogen atom and five O coordination sites. In order to extend the investigation in this field, we synthesized the lanthanide coordination polymer {[Tb(C7H2NO5)(H2O)3].H2O}, and report its structure here.

The title compound is isotypic with its Dy (Gao et al., 2006) and Eu (Lv et al., 2010) analogues. As shown in Fig.1, the asymmetric unit contains one Tb(III) ion, one 4-oxidopyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate anion, three coordinated water molecules, and one water molecule of crystallisation. The Tb atom is eight-coordinated by seven oxygen atoms from three anions and three coordinated water molecules and by one nitrogen atom from one tridentate anion (the other two anions are monodentate), forming a distorted bicapped trigonal-prismatic coordination environment.

Important bond distances and angles are presented in Table 1. The Tb—O bond lengths [2.3035 (19) to 2.424 (2) Å] are shorter than the Tb—N bond length [2.471 (2) Å], which is in agreement with the bond lengths observed in other Tb(III) complexes (Chen et al., 2008; Ramya et al., 2010). The anion adopts a µ3-pentadentate coordination mode, as shown in Fig. 1. The anions bridge adjacent TbIII ions to form infinite double chains (Fig. 2). Adjacent chains are further connected by the coordination of the anions and Tb(III) ions into a two-dimensional sheet parallel to (101) (Fig. 3), which are further extended into a three-dimensional framework through O—H···O hydrogen-bonding interactions including both coordinated and uncoordinated water molecules (Table 2).

Experimental

To a solution of terbium(III) nitrate hexahydrate (0.136 g, 0.3 mmol) in water (5 ml) was added an aqueous solution (5 ml) of the ligand (0.060 g, 0.3 mmol) and a drop of triethylamine. The reactants were sealed in a 25-ml Teflon-lined stainless-steel Parr bomb. The bomb was heated at 433 K for 3 days. The cool solution contained single crystals in ca 60% yield. Anal. Calcd for C7H10TbNO9: C, 20.45; H, 2.45; N, 3.41. Found: C, 20.16; H, 2.17; N, 3.74.

Refinement

The coordinated water H atoms were located in a different Fourier map and refined with distance constraints of O–H = 0.83 (3) Å. The free water H atoms were placed at calculated positions and refined with a riding model, considering the position of oxygen atoms and the quantity of H atoms. The carbon-bound H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions, with C—H = 0.93 Å and constrained to ride on their respective parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). The two highest remaining electron denstity peaks greater than one electron per Å3 are located at (0.4907 0.8249 0.2004) and (0.5006 0.8231 0.3054), repectively. The corresponding distances to the nearest atom (heavy atom Tb1) are ca 0.80 Å.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Drawing of the asymmetric unit of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

View along the b axis of the title compound, showing the double chain.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

View approximately along the a axis, showing the sheet structure of {[Tb(C7H2NO5)(H2O)3].H2O}.

Crystal data

[Tb(C7H2NO5)(H2O)3]·H2O F(000) = 784
Mr = 411.08 Dx = 2.436 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 5700 reflections
a = 9.953 (2) Å θ = 2.2–28.3°
b = 7.5454 (16) Å µ = 6.35 mm−1
c = 15.461 (3) Å T = 293 K
β = 105.126 (2)° Block, colorless
V = 1120.9 (4) Å3 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.22 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2080 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1929 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.032
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) h = −12→11
Tmin = 0.162, Tmax = 0.247 k = −9→8
7828 measured reflections l = −18→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.051 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0227P)2 + 0.941P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2080 reflections Δρmax = 1.34 e Å−3
196 parameters Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3
12 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0244 (6)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Tb1 0.499147 (11) 0.823001 (18) 0.253250 (7) 0.01168 (10)
C1 0.5913 (3) 0.8297 (4) 0.06235 (18) 0.0145 (6)
C2 0.4542 (3) 0.7331 (4) 0.03360 (17) 0.0137 (6)
C3 0.3928 (3) 0.6833 (4) −0.05345 (18) 0.0157 (6)
H3 0.4367 0.7069 −0.0984 0.019*
C4 0.2628 (3) 0.5961 (4) −0.07393 (17) 0.0150 (6)
C5 0.2059 (3) 0.5615 (4) −0.00148 (17) 0.0166 (6)
H5 0.1218 0.5012 −0.0109 0.020*
C6 0.2739 (3) 0.6163 (4) 0.08284 (17) 0.0149 (6)
C7 0.2160 (3) 0.5940 (4) 0.16200 (17) 0.0176 (6)
H1W 0.685 (3) 0.519 (5) 0.3081 (14) 0.033 (10)*
H2W 0.678 (4) 0.555 (5) 0.2179 (17) 0.049 (12)*
H3W 0.507 (4) 0.547 (2) 0.394 (2) 0.049 (13)*
H4W 0.477 (4) 0.706 (4) 0.433 (2) 0.039 (12)*
H5W 0.378 (3) 1.090 (5) 0.1149 (12) 0.032 (10)*
H6W 0.339 (4) 1.121 (5) 0.196 (2) 0.051 (13)*
H7W 0.348 (2) 0.664 (5) 0.544 (3) 0.051 (14)*
H8W 0.457 (5) 0.756 (7) 0.608 (3) 0.11 (2)*
N1 0.3970 (3) 0.7017 (3) 0.10190 (15) 0.0144 (5)
O1 0.6315 (2) 0.8714 (3) 0.14414 (12) 0.0198 (5)
O2 0.6576 (2) 0.8598 (3) 0.00587 (13) 0.0232 (5)
O3 0.2780 (2) 0.6745 (3) 0.23225 (14) 0.0273 (6)
O4 0.1088 (2) 0.5009 (3) 0.15414 (12) 0.0222 (5)
O5 0.1971 (2) 0.5510 (3) −0.15625 (12) 0.0191 (5)
O6 0.6360 (2) 0.5619 (3) 0.25964 (14) 0.0286 (5)
O7 0.5014 (3) 0.6624 (3) 0.38879 (14) 0.0254 (5)
O8 0.3974 (3) 1.0761 (3) 0.17129 (14) 0.0294 (6)
O9 0.4360 (3) 0.6777 (3) 0.5670 (2) 0.0376 (6)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Tb1 0.00900 (13) 0.01520 (14) 0.01068 (12) −0.00006 (5) 0.00229 (7) −0.00069 (4)
C1 0.0132 (15) 0.0153 (15) 0.0153 (13) 0.0025 (11) 0.0043 (11) 0.0017 (10)
C2 0.0126 (15) 0.0137 (14) 0.0153 (12) 0.0009 (12) 0.0044 (11) 0.0017 (11)
C3 0.0146 (16) 0.0195 (16) 0.0137 (13) 0.0016 (11) 0.0047 (11) 0.0008 (10)
C4 0.0133 (15) 0.0159 (15) 0.0145 (12) 0.0045 (12) 0.0013 (10) −0.0021 (10)
C5 0.0121 (15) 0.0184 (15) 0.0186 (13) −0.0034 (12) 0.0030 (11) −0.0012 (11)
C6 0.0113 (14) 0.0165 (15) 0.0168 (13) −0.0007 (12) 0.0036 (11) 0.0023 (11)
C7 0.0136 (15) 0.0219 (16) 0.0170 (13) 0.0004 (13) 0.0035 (11) 0.0018 (11)
N1 0.0099 (13) 0.0182 (13) 0.0148 (11) −0.0016 (10) 0.0027 (9) −0.0013 (9)
O1 0.0145 (11) 0.0288 (12) 0.0164 (10) −0.0054 (9) 0.0048 (8) −0.0030 (8)
O2 0.0189 (12) 0.0352 (13) 0.0178 (10) −0.0049 (10) 0.0087 (8) 0.0022 (9)
O3 0.0229 (13) 0.0446 (16) 0.0165 (10) −0.0167 (10) 0.0087 (9) −0.0084 (9)
O4 0.0184 (12) 0.0307 (13) 0.0178 (9) −0.0134 (10) 0.0050 (8) −0.0016 (8)
O5 0.0155 (11) 0.0272 (12) 0.0126 (9) 0.0033 (9) −0.0001 (8) −0.0052 (8)
O6 0.0329 (14) 0.0328 (14) 0.0226 (11) 0.0189 (11) 0.0118 (10) 0.0066 (10)
O7 0.0338 (15) 0.0226 (14) 0.0218 (11) 0.0025 (10) 0.0107 (10) 0.0009 (9)
O8 0.0394 (15) 0.0339 (14) 0.0198 (11) 0.0178 (11) 0.0163 (10) 0.0098 (10)
O9 0.0222 (15) 0.0273 (15) 0.0595 (18) 0.0038 (11) 0.0041 (13) 0.0031 (12)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Tb1—O5i 2.3035 (19) C5—C6 1.367 (4)
Tb1—O8 2.368 (2) C5—H5 0.9300
Tb1—O6 2.383 (2) C6—N1 1.347 (4)
Tb1—O4ii 2.4106 (19) C6—C7 1.492 (4)
Tb1—O3 2.415 (2) C7—O4 1.256 (3)
Tb1—O7 2.416 (2) C7—O3 1.257 (3)
Tb1—O1 2.424 (2) O4—Tb1iii 2.4106 (19)
Tb1—N1 2.471 (2) O5—Tb1iv 2.3035 (19)
C1—O2 1.245 (3) O6—H1W 0.85 (4)
C1—O1 1.263 (3) O6—H2W 0.86 (4)
C1—C2 1.508 (4) O7—H3W 0.875 (16)
C2—N1 1.345 (4) O7—H4W 0.85 (4)
C2—C3 1.377 (4) O8—H5W 0.849 (16)
C3—C4 1.412 (4) O8—H6W 0.85 (4)
C3—H3 0.9300 O9—H7W 0.86 (4)
C4—O5 1.315 (3) O9—H8W 0.85 (4)
C4—C5 1.405 (4)
O5i—Tb1—O8 99.83 (8) C3—C2—C1 123.8 (2)
O5i—Tb1—O6 85.81 (8) C2—C3—C4 119.5 (3)
O8—Tb1—O6 148.11 (7) C2—C3—H3 120.2
O5i—Tb1—O4ii 81.52 (7) C4—C3—H3 120.2
O8—Tb1—O4ii 70.97 (7) O5—C4—C5 121.4 (3)
O6—Tb1—O4ii 140.77 (7) O5—C4—C3 122.2 (2)
O5i—Tb1—O3 151.44 (7) C5—C4—C3 116.4 (2)
O8—Tb1—O3 93.13 (9) C6—C5—C4 120.1 (3)
O6—Tb1—O3 96.50 (8) C6—C5—H5 120.0
O4ii—Tb1—O3 78.83 (7) C4—C5—H5 120.0
O5i—Tb1—O7 82.37 (8) N1—C6—C5 123.3 (3)
O8—Tb1—O7 140.75 (8) N1—C6—C7 113.5 (2)
O6—Tb1—O7 70.95 (8) C5—C6—C7 123.2 (3)
O4ii—Tb1—O7 70.65 (7) O4—C7—O3 124.5 (3)
O3—Tb1—O7 71.68 (8) O4—C7—C6 118.9 (2)
O5i—Tb1—O1 80.00 (7) O3—C7—C6 116.5 (3)
O8—Tb1—O1 74.95 (7) C2—N1—C6 117.4 (2)
O6—Tb1—O1 75.22 (8) C2—N1—Tb1 121.61 (19)
O4ii—Tb1—O1 137.48 (7) C6—N1—Tb1 120.69 (18)
O3—Tb1—O1 128.19 (7) C1—O1—Tb1 124.88 (18)
O7—Tb1—O1 142.73 (8) C7—O3—Tb1 124.41 (18)
O5i—Tb1—N1 143.47 (8) C7—O4—Tb1iii 138.84 (17)
O8—Tb1—N1 77.25 (8) C4—O5—Tb1iv 127.69 (17)
O6—Tb1—N1 79.77 (8) Tb1—O6—H1W 123 (2)
O4ii—Tb1—N1 129.18 (8) Tb1—O6—H2W 114 (3)
O3—Tb1—N1 64.24 (7) H1W—O6—H2W 112 (3)
O7—Tb1—N1 122.96 (8) Tb1—O7—H3W 124 (2)
O1—Tb1—N1 63.95 (7) Tb1—O7—H4W 125 (2)
O2—C1—O1 124.7 (3) H3W—O7—H4W 110 (3)
O2—C1—C2 119.1 (2) Tb1—O8—H5W 127 (2)
O1—C1—C2 116.2 (2) Tb1—O8—H6W 109 (3)
N1—C2—C3 123.2 (3) H5W—O8—H6W 115 (3)
N1—C2—C1 112.9 (2) H7W—O9—H8W 114 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O6—H1W···O1v 0.85 (4) 2.10 (3) 2.799 (3) 139 (3)
O6—H2W···O5vi 0.86 (4) 1.93 (3) 2.725 (3) 154 (3)
O7—H3W···O9vii 0.88 (2) 1.84 (2) 2.687 (3) 162 (4)
O7—H4W···O9 0.85 (4) 2.23 (3) 2.995 (4) 151 (3)
O8—H5W···O2viii 0.85 (2) 1.85 (2) 2.693 (3) 175 (4)
O8—H6W···O3ii 0.85 (4) 1.85 (4) 2.680 (3) 167 (4)
O9—H7W···O2ix 0.86 (4) 1.84 (2) 2.699 (3) 175 (4)
O9—H8W···O4i 0.85 (4) 2.37 (4) 3.073 (4) 141 (5)

Symmetry codes: (v) −x+3/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (vi) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (vii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (viii) −x+1, −y+2, −z; (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ix) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (i) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: WM2449).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2004). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Chen, Z., Fang, M., Ren, P., Li, X. H., Zhao, B., Wei, S. & Cheng, P. (2008). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 634, 382–386.
  4. Gao, H. L., Yi, L., Zhao, B., Zhao, X. Q., Cheng, P., Liao, D. Z. & Yan, S. P. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 5980–5988. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Gao, H. L., Zhao, B., Zhao, X. Q., Zhao, X. Q., Song, Y., Cheng, P., Liao, D. Z. & Yan, S. P. (2008). Inorg. Chem. 47, 11057–11061. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. He, H. Y., Yuan, D. Q., Ma, H. Q., Sun, D. F., Zhang, G. Q. & Zhou, H. C. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 7605–7607. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Kustaryono, D., Kerbellec, N., Calvez, G., Freslon, S., Daiguebonne, C. & Guillou, O. (2010). Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 775–781.
  8. Li, X., Zhang, Y. B., Shi, W. & Li, P. Z. (2008). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 11, 869–872.
  9. Luo, F., Che, Y. X. & Zheng, J. M. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 2006–2010.
  10. Lv, D.-Y., Gao, Z.-Q. & Gu, J.-Z. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1694–m1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Ramya, A. R., Reddy, M. L. P., Cowley, A. H. & Vasudevant, K. V. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 2407–2415. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005447/wm2449sup1.cif

e-67-0m357-sup1.cif (16.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005447/wm2449Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m357-Isup2.hkl (102.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES