Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Feb 19;67(Pt 3):m352. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811005563

(2,2′-Bipyridine-κ2 N,N′)bis­(3-meth­oxy­benzoato-κ2 O 1,O 1′)copper(II) mono­hydrate

Ming-Hao Lin a, Jing-Fan Zhou a, Bin-Bin Liu a, Jian-Li Lin a,*
PMCID: PMC3052164  PMID: 21522281

Abstract

The title compound, [Cu(C8H7O3)2(C10H8N2)]·H2O, is comprised of a CuII ion, two 3-meth­oxy­benzoate ligands, a 2,2′-bipyridine (bipy) ligand and one uncoordinated water mol­ecule. The CuII ion and the water O atom lie on a twofold axis. The CuII ion exhibits a six-coordinate distorted octa­hedral geometry, with two N atoms from the bipy ligand [Cu—N = 1.9996 (16) Å] and four O atoms from two 3-meth­oxy­benzoate ligands [Cu—O = 1.9551 (15) and 2.6016 (16) Å]. The mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For hydrogen bonds and crystal engineering, see: Aakeröy & Seddon (1993 ▶). For potential applications of transition metal complexes, see: Liu et al. (2007 ▶); Shibasaki & Yoshikawa (2002 ▶). For carboxylate compounds with six-coordinate metal atoms, see: Liu et al. (2010 ▶); Su et al. (2005 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0m352-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(C8H7O3)2(C10H8N2)]·H2O

  • M r = 540.01

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 19.888 (4) Å

  • b = 10.887 (2) Å

  • c = 11.612 (2) Å

  • β = 103.62 (3)°

  • V = 2443.5 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.94 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

  • Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.710, T max = 0.780

  • 12080 measured reflections

  • 2796 independent reflections

  • 2391 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.054

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F 2) = 0.113

  • S = 1.05

  • 2796 reflections

  • 165 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) ▶; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005563/rn2078sup1.cif

e-67-0m352-sup1.cif (16.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005563/rn2078Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m352-Isup2.hkl (137.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O4—H41⋯O1 0.88 2.24 3.023 (3) 147
C12—H12A⋯O4ii 0.93 2.41 3.339 (3) 178
C11—H11A⋯O3ii 0.93 2.57 3.483 (3) 166
C10—H10A⋯O2iii 0.93 2.66 3.342 (3) 131

Symmetry codes: (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Education Department of Zhejiang Province and the scientific research fund of Nibong University (grant No. XKL069). Thanks are also extended to the K. C. Wong Magna Fund, Ningbo University.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the past decade, a variety of supramolecular architectures based on hydrogen bonds, π···π interactions have been achieved by using transition metal centers and organic ligands (Aakeroy et al., 1993), they have potential application in catalysis, gas storage, and in molecular–based magnetic materials (Liu et al., 2007, Shibasaki et al., 2002). Herein, we are interested in self-assemblies of Cu2+ ions and bipy with 3–methoxybenzoic acid, which led to the preparation of [Cu(bipy)2(C8H8O3)2].H2O.

The title compound, [Cu(bipy)2(C8H8O3)2].H2O, is comprised of a CuII ion, two 3–methoxybenzoate ligands, a 2,2'–bipyridine(bipy) ligand and one lattice H2O molecule. As illustrated in Fig.1, the Cu ion and water O atom lie on a two fold axis. The CuII ion has a six–coordinate distorted octahedral geometry with two N atoms from the bipy ligand [Cu–N = 1.9996 (16) Å] and four O atoms from two 3–methoxybenzoate ligands [Cu–O = 1.9551 (15) and 2.6016 (16) Å]. Owing to geometric constraints and the Jahn–Teller effect, the Cu–O bonds in the axial direction are longer than in the equatorial plane. Two O atoms and two N atoms occupy the equatorial plane position with the r.m.s. deviation from the ideal plane of 0.214 Å, while two O atoms lie in the apical positions with an axis angle of 140.53 (5)° showing a large deviation from the normal 180°,which is also seen in similar carboxylate complexes (Liu et al., 2010; Su et al., 2005). For 3–methoxybenzoate anions, the plane of benzene ring and carboxylate group are nearly co–planar where the dihedral angle between the benzene ring and carboxylate plane is 5.2 (3)°. The water molecules are not coordinated to Cu and the distance between copper and water oxygen atoms is 4.019 (2) Å.

The molecules are linked via hydrogen bonds (O4–H41···O1, C12–H12A···O4, C11–H11A···O3) into one-dimensional supramolecular chains extending along the [100] direction, which are linked by hydrogen bonds (C5–H5A···O2) into two dimensional layers parallel to (100) (Fig. 2). The layers are arranged alternately in an ···ABAB···sequence and further assembled into there–dimensional network by hydrogen bonds (C10–H10A···O2).

Experimental

CuCl2.2H2O (0.1705 g, 1.000 mmol) was successively added to 20 ml C2H5OH–H2O(1:1, v/v), 3–methoxybenzoate (0.1520 g, 1.000 mmol) and bipy (0.1569 g, 1.004 mmol) were subsequently added, then 1.4 ml (1 M) NaOH was added dropwise and stirred continuously for 1 h to give a blue suspension. After filtration, the blue filtrate (pH = 5.80) was allowed to stand at room temperature for several weeks to give blue block–shaped crystals

Refinement

H atoms bonded to C atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and were refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). H atoms attached to O atoms were found in a difference Fourier synthesis and were refined using a riding model, with the O—H distances fixed as initially found and with Uiso(H) values set at 1.2 Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound,with atom labels and 45% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms. Symmetry code for the symbol 'A': -x, y + 1, 0.5 - z.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The two-dimensional supramolecular layers of the title compound parallel to (100) showing O–H···O, C–H···O hydrogen bonds.

Crystal data

[Cu(C8H7O3)2(C10H8N2)]·H2O F(000) = 1116
Mr = 540.01 Dx = 1.468 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 12080 reflections
a = 19.888 (4) Å θ = 3.6–27.5°
b = 10.887 (2) Å µ = 0.94 mm−1
c = 11.612 (2) Å T = 293 K
β = 103.62 (3)° Block, blue
V = 2443.5 (8) Å3 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer 2796 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2391 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.054
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.6°
ω scans h = −25→25
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995) k = −14→14
Tmin = 0.710, Tmax = 0.78 l = −15→14
12080 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.113 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0638P)2 + 0.7842P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2796 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
165 parameters Δρmax = 0.35 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.39 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu 0.0000 0.52776 (3) 0.7500 0.04304 (15)
O1 −0.04555 (7) 0.40392 (14) 0.82712 (14) 0.0539 (4)
O2 −0.12489 (8) 0.44707 (15) 0.66421 (15) 0.0598 (4)
O3 −0.15000 (9) 0.11263 (17) 1.05759 (15) 0.0669 (5)
N1 −0.03034 (8) 0.66715 (15) 0.83787 (14) 0.0426 (4)
C1 −0.10582 (10) 0.39069 (18) 0.75900 (19) 0.0470 (5)
C2 −0.15286 (10) 0.30133 (18) 0.79947 (19) 0.0475 (5)
C3 −0.21724 (12) 0.2726 (2) 0.7265 (2) 0.0611 (6)
H3A −0.2317 0.3089 0.6523 0.073*
C4 −0.25923 (13) 0.1895 (3) 0.7658 (3) 0.0724 (7)
H4A −0.3021 0.1702 0.7170 0.087*
C5 −0.23949 (12) 0.1344 (2) 0.8754 (3) 0.0646 (6)
H5A −0.2688 0.0790 0.9003 0.078*
C6 −0.17571 (11) 0.16247 (19) 0.9479 (2) 0.0534 (5)
C7 −0.13269 (10) 0.24562 (19) 0.9099 (2) 0.0498 (5)
H7A −0.0898 0.2643 0.9590 0.060*
C8 −0.19197 (18) 0.0270 (3) 1.1014 (3) 0.0818 (9)
H8A −0.1674 −0.0022 1.1777 0.123*
H8B −0.2028 −0.0410 1.0476 0.123*
H8C −0.2340 0.0664 1.1085 0.123*
C9 −0.06227 (11) 0.6578 (2) 0.92759 (18) 0.0492 (5)
H9A −0.0705 0.5802 0.9549 0.059*
C10 −0.08304 (12) 0.7594 (2) 0.97979 (19) 0.0557 (5)
H10A −0.1055 0.7507 1.0411 0.067*
C11 −0.07033 (13) 0.8737 (2) 0.9407 (2) 0.0599 (6)
H11A −0.0838 0.9434 0.9757 0.072*
C12 −0.03730 (12) 0.8849 (2) 0.8490 (2) 0.0552 (5)
H12A −0.0282 0.9619 0.8215 0.066*
C13 −0.01811 (10) 0.77943 (18) 0.79901 (17) 0.0426 (4)
O4 0.0000 0.1586 (2) 0.7500 0.0842 (8)
H41 −0.0138 0.2109 0.7975 0.126*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu 0.0395 (2) 0.0333 (2) 0.0560 (2) 0.000 0.01071 (15) 0.000
O1 0.0423 (8) 0.0427 (8) 0.0740 (10) −0.0074 (6) 0.0083 (7) 0.0071 (7)
O2 0.0532 (9) 0.0576 (9) 0.0692 (10) 0.0083 (7) 0.0159 (8) 0.0082 (8)
O3 0.0646 (10) 0.0641 (11) 0.0774 (11) −0.0110 (8) 0.0277 (9) 0.0081 (8)
N1 0.0407 (9) 0.0405 (9) 0.0468 (9) −0.0013 (7) 0.0108 (7) 0.0020 (6)
C1 0.0435 (11) 0.0356 (10) 0.0642 (12) 0.0055 (8) 0.0174 (9) −0.0021 (9)
C2 0.0367 (10) 0.0361 (10) 0.0696 (13) 0.0015 (8) 0.0125 (9) −0.0064 (9)
C3 0.0457 (12) 0.0546 (13) 0.0777 (15) −0.0014 (10) 0.0040 (11) −0.0038 (11)
C4 0.0400 (12) 0.0667 (16) 0.103 (2) −0.0126 (11) 0.0024 (12) −0.0111 (15)
C5 0.0459 (13) 0.0512 (13) 0.1009 (19) −0.0111 (10) 0.0258 (12) −0.0081 (12)
C6 0.0478 (12) 0.0425 (11) 0.0754 (14) −0.0041 (9) 0.0254 (10) −0.0069 (10)
C7 0.0383 (10) 0.0447 (11) 0.0671 (13) −0.0052 (8) 0.0135 (9) −0.0048 (9)
C8 0.093 (2) 0.0693 (19) 0.098 (2) −0.0154 (15) 0.0526 (19) 0.0040 (14)
C9 0.0461 (11) 0.0513 (12) 0.0508 (11) −0.0028 (9) 0.0127 (9) 0.0042 (9)
C10 0.0557 (13) 0.0657 (14) 0.0502 (11) 0.0017 (11) 0.0211 (10) −0.0018 (10)
C11 0.0696 (15) 0.0536 (13) 0.0614 (13) 0.0079 (11) 0.0255 (11) −0.0082 (10)
C12 0.0679 (14) 0.0386 (11) 0.0629 (13) 0.0042 (10) 0.0232 (11) −0.0006 (9)
C13 0.0430 (10) 0.0384 (10) 0.0462 (10) 0.0013 (8) 0.0100 (8) −0.0011 (7)
O4 0.124 (3) 0.0464 (14) 0.0887 (18) 0.000 0.0370 (17) 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu—O1i 1.9551 (15) C5—C6 1.381 (3)
Cu—O1 1.9551 (15) C5—H5A 0.9300
Cu—N1i 1.9996 (16) C6—C7 1.387 (3)
Cu—N1 1.9996 (16) C7—H7A 0.9300
O1—C1 1.279 (3) C8—H8A 0.9600
O2—C1 1.239 (3) C8—H8B 0.9600
O3—C6 1.368 (3) C8—H8C 0.9600
O3—C8 1.423 (3) C9—C10 1.371 (3)
N1—C13 1.345 (2) C9—H9A 0.9300
N1—C9 1.346 (3) C10—C11 1.369 (3)
C1—C2 1.500 (3) C10—H10A 0.9300
C2—C7 1.390 (3) C11—C12 1.382 (3)
C2—C3 1.395 (3) C11—H11A 0.9300
C3—C4 1.380 (4) C12—C13 1.380 (3)
C3—H3A 0.9300 C12—H12A 0.9300
C4—C5 1.378 (4) C13—C13i 1.483 (4)
C4—H4A 0.9300 O4—H41 0.8800
O1i—Cu—O1 92.80 (10) O3—C6—C7 115.6 (2)
O1i—Cu—N1i 93.53 (7) C5—C6—C7 119.8 (2)
O1—Cu—N1i 170.12 (6) C6—C7—C2 120.8 (2)
O1i—Cu—N1 170.12 (6) C6—C7—H7A 119.6
O1—Cu—N1 93.53 (7) C2—C7—H7A 119.6
N1i—Cu—N1 81.25 (9) O3—C8—H8A 109.5
C1—O1—Cu 105.20 (13) O3—C8—H8B 109.5
C6—O3—C8 118.1 (2) H8A—C8—H8B 109.5
C13—N1—C9 118.97 (17) O3—C8—H8C 109.5
C13—N1—Cu 114.74 (12) H8A—C8—H8C 109.5
C9—N1—Cu 126.27 (14) H8B—C8—H8C 109.5
O2—C1—O1 122.66 (19) N1—C9—C10 121.83 (19)
O2—C1—C2 121.1 (2) N1—C9—H9A 119.1
O1—C1—C2 116.23 (18) C10—C9—H9A 119.1
C7—C2—C3 119.2 (2) C11—C10—C9 119.26 (19)
C7—C2—C1 120.43 (19) C11—C10—H10A 120.4
C3—C2—C1 120.4 (2) C9—C10—H10A 120.4
C4—C3—C2 119.1 (2) C10—C11—C12 119.6 (2)
C4—C3—H3A 120.4 C10—C11—H11A 120.2
C2—C3—H3A 120.4 C12—C11—H11A 120.2
C5—C4—C3 121.9 (2) C13—C12—C11 118.6 (2)
C5—C4—H4A 119.1 C13—C12—H12A 120.7
C3—C4—H4A 119.1 C11—C12—H12A 120.7
C4—C5—C6 119.2 (2) N1—C13—C12 121.68 (17)
C4—C5—H5A 120.4 N1—C13—C13i 114.60 (10)
C6—C5—H5A 120.4 C12—C13—C13i 123.71 (12)
O3—C6—C5 124.6 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+3/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O4—H41···O1 0.88 2.24 3.023 (3) 147
C12—H12A···O4ii 0.93 2.41 3.339 (3) 178
C11—H11A···O3ii 0.93 2.57 3.483 (3) 166
C10—H10A···O2iii 0.93 2.66 3.342 (3) 131

Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, −y+1, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: RN2078).

References

  1. Aakeröy, C. B. & Seddon, K. R. (1993). Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 397–407.
  2. Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
  4. Liu, Y. L., Eubank, J. F., Cairns, A. J., Eckert, J., Kravtsov, V. C., Luebke, R. & Eddaoudi, M. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 3278–3283. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y., Sun, J. & Niu, X. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Rigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Rigaku/MSC (2004). CrystalStructure Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Shibasaki, M. & Yoshikawa, N. (2002). Chem. Rev. 102, 2187–2209. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Su, J.-R., Gu, J.-M. & Xu, D.-J. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m379–m381.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005563/rn2078sup1.cif

e-67-0m352-sup1.cif (16.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811005563/rn2078Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m352-Isup2.hkl (137.4KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES