Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Feb 9;67(Pt 3):o590. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811004004

5-Fluoro­isophthalic acid

Jin-Ling Mi a, Le Chen a, Ming-Yang He a,*
PMCID: PMC3052173  PMID: 21522351

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C8H5FO4, the complete molecule is generated by crystallographic twofold symmetry with two C atoms and the F atom lying on the axis. The mol­ecule is almost planar with the carboxyl group twisted with respect to the mean plane of the benzene ring by a dihedral angle of 2.01 (1)°. In the crystal, inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯F inter­actions connect the mol­ecules into a two-dimensional supra­molecular array.

Related literature

For isophthalic acid, see: Bhogala et al. (2005 ▶); Derissen (1974 ▶). For the use of the title compound in crystal engin­eering, see: Zhang et al. (2010 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0o590-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C8H5FO4

  • M r = 184.12

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 3.7736 (8) Å

  • b = 16.292 (4) Å

  • c = 6.2753 (14) Å

  • β = 91.871 (5)°

  • V = 385.60 (14) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.14 mm−1

  • T = 297 K

  • 0.22 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.969, T max = 0.979

  • 2201 measured reflections

  • 743 independent reflections

  • 603 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.018

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F 2) = 0.161

  • S = 1.04

  • 743 reflections

  • 64 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002sup1.cif

e-67-0o590-sup1.cif (12.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o590-Isup2.hkl (37KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.82 1.81 2.625 (2) 174
C5—H5⋯F1ii 0.93 2.52 3.404 (2) 160

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Jiangsu Province Outstanding Science and Technology Innovation Team and Changzhou University for financial support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

As an analogue of isophthalic acid (Bhogala et al. 2005; Derissen, 1974), 5-fluoroisophthalic acid has been seldom used in the crystal engineering of organic or inorganic-organic systems (Zhang et al. 2010). The fluorinated group may participate in hydrogen-bonding and may also induce luminescence properties. Herein we report the crystal structure of the title compound, C8H5FO4, to further investigate the supramolecular interactions involving the fluorine atom. The structure of the title compound, is shown below. The molecule presents C2 symmetry with the fundamental unit lying on a C2-axis at [x, 3/4, z]. Intermolecular O—H···O interactions between adjoining centrosymmetry-related carboxylic groups form a hydrogen-bonded ribbon running along the [010] direction. C—H···F interactions connect the ribbons into a two-dimensional supramolecular array.

Experimental

5-Fluoroisophthalic acid and solvents for synthesis and analysis were commercially available and used as received. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of the methanol solution of the title compound.

Refinement

Benzene H atoms were assigned to calculated positions with C—H = 0.93 Å, and refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). H atoms bound to carboxylic O atoms were located in difference maps and refined as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound drawn with 30% probability ellipsoids.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Two-dimensional hydrogen-bonded layer of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are indicated as dashed lines.

Crystal data

C8H5FO4 F(000) = 188
Mr = 184.12 Dx = 1.586 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/m Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yb Cell parameters from 1020 reflections
a = 3.7736 (8) Å θ = 2.5–28.0°
b = 16.292 (4) Å µ = 0.14 mm−1
c = 6.2753 (14) Å T = 297 K
β = 91.871 (5)° Block, colourless
V = 385.60 (14) Å3 0.22 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 743 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 603 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.018
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) h = −4→4
Tmin = 0.969, Tmax = 0.979 k = −17→19
2201 measured reflections l = −7→5

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.161 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1244P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
743 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
64 parameters Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.6268 (4) 0.59855 (9) 0.8588 (3) 0.0524 (5)
C2 0.7105 (4) 0.67633 (9) 0.7484 (2) 0.0487 (5)
C3 0.8602 (4) 0.67563 (10) 0.5486 (3) 0.0529 (5)
H3 0.9107 0.6265 0.4806 0.063*
C4 0.9312 (5) 0.7500 0.4549 (3) 0.0540 (6)
C5 0.6370 (5) 0.7500 0.8476 (3) 0.0477 (6)
H5 0.5379 0.7500 0.9813 0.057*
F1 1.0787 (4) 0.7500 0.2629 (2) 0.0744 (6)
O1 0.7073 (4) 0.53205 (8) 0.7622 (2) 0.0775 (6)
H1 0.6348 0.4905 0.8205 0.116*
O2 0.4837 (4) 0.60037 (7) 1.0328 (2) 0.0722 (6)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0490 (9) 0.0612 (10) 0.0474 (10) −0.0023 (6) 0.0088 (7) −0.0080 (7)
C2 0.0385 (8) 0.0652 (11) 0.0424 (9) −0.0012 (6) 0.0022 (6) −0.0051 (6)
C3 0.0420 (9) 0.0726 (12) 0.0441 (10) −0.0006 (6) 0.0027 (7) −0.0087 (7)
C4 0.0426 (11) 0.0852 (16) 0.0346 (11) 0.000 0.0069 (9) 0.000
C5 0.0400 (10) 0.0642 (14) 0.0395 (11) 0.000 0.0072 (8) 0.000
F1 0.0745 (10) 0.1105 (12) 0.0393 (8) 0.000 0.0190 (7) 0.000
O1 0.1022 (11) 0.0610 (8) 0.0715 (10) −0.0050 (6) 0.0359 (8) −0.0121 (6)
O2 0.0938 (10) 0.0622 (9) 0.0628 (9) −0.0038 (6) 0.0355 (7) −0.0032 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—O2 1.235 (2) C3—H3 0.9300
C1—O1 1.2826 (19) C4—F1 1.343 (2)
C1—C2 1.483 (2) C4—C3i 1.377 (2)
C2—C5 1.3841 (18) C5—C2i 1.3841 (19)
C2—C3 1.392 (2) C5—H5 0.9300
C3—C4 1.377 (2) O1—H1 0.8201
O2—C1—O1 123.73 (15) C2—C3—H3 121.1
O2—C1—C2 119.91 (13) F1—C4—C3 118.37 (11)
O1—C1—C2 116.35 (15) F1—C4—C3i 118.36 (11)
C5—C2—C3 120.34 (15) C3—C4—C3i 123.3 (2)
C5—C2—C1 118.83 (15) C2—C5—C2i 120.3 (2)
C3—C2—C1 120.83 (14) C2—C5—H5 119.9
C4—C3—C2 117.89 (16) C2i—C5—H5 119.9
C4—C3—H3 121.1 C1—O1—H1 113.5
O2—C1—C2—C5 2.3 (3) C1—C2—C3—C4 179.97 (14)
O1—C1—C2—C5 −178.51 (16) C2—C3—C4—F1 179.40 (14)
O2—C1—C2—C3 −177.68 (14) C2—C3—C4—C3i −0.3 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3 1.5 (3) C3—C2—C5—C2i 0.3 (3)
C5—C2—C3—C4 0.0 (3) C1—C2—C5—C2i −179.72 (12)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+3/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1···O2ii 0.82 1.81 2.625 (2) 174
C5—H5···F1iii 0.93 2.52 3.404 (2) 160

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (iii) x−1, y, z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GO2002).

References

  1. Bhogala, B. R., Basavoju, S. & Nangia, A. (2005). CrystEngComm, 7, 551–562.
  2. Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Bruker (2001). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Bruker (2003). APEX2 Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Derissen, J. L. (1974). Acta Cryst. B30, 2764–2765.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Z.-H., Chen, S.-C., Mi, J.-L., He, M.-Y., Chen, Q., Wu, Z.-H. & Hu, Z.-J. (2010). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 13, 1435–1438.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002sup1.cif

e-67-0o590-sup1.cif (12.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811004004/go2002Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o590-Isup2.hkl (37KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES