Abstract
Pregnancy is a time of relative urgency and opportunity for the treatment of substance use disorders in women, yet little is known about modifiable factors that contribute to successful abstinence. We examined self worth, depression, anxiety and novelty seeking in the context of substance use cessation during pregnancy in a sample of women with a high prevalence of substance abuse. Subjects were 448 birth mothers who participated in a prospective adoption study. Discontinuation rates were: tobacco 22.2%, alcohol 64.7%, marijuana 77.2%, and other drugs, 73.7 to 100 %. Depression, anxiety, and novelty seeking were lower among women who discontinued substance use, compared to those who did not. Self worth was higher in women who discontinued substance use. Among 110 polysubstance users, the number of substances discontinued during pregnancy was correlated with depression, anxiety and self worth in the hypothesized direction. Possible clinical implications are discussed.
Introduction
The harm associated with intrauterine exposure to alcohol, nicotine and illicit drugs of abuse is well known, extensive and intergenerational.1–3 Although the prevalence of substance abuse is significantly lower in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant women,4 some groups remain vulnerable to continued use, including those who did not intend to get pregnant5,6 and those who are less educated, unemployed, unmarried and exposed to violence.7 Less is known about modifiable clinical factors that may influence prenatal substance use.
Recent literature suggests that clinical characteristics may be important. For example, increased and persistent substance use during pregnancy is associated with prenatal depression,8 and mood disorders are barriers to successful abstinence in pregnant women in substance abuse treatment.9 Persistent cigarette smoking during pregnancy has been linked to a history of problematic relationships, health behaviors, and adaptive functioning.10 Literature on non-pregnant samples suggests additional areas where clinicians can intervene. In non-pregnant women, positive associations have been found between substance abuse, mood and anxiety disorders.11 The personality trait of novelty seeking has been associated with both a predisposition to developing drug dependence12 and more difficulty in sustaining abstinence.13,14 Finally, self-esteem has been shown to be a mediator between negative life events and substance abuse in adults,15 and interventions aimed at building self-esteem have had positive effects on reducing substance use.16 Understanding the interaction between these clinical characteristics and discontinuing substance use during pregnancy is an important step in designing more targeted and effective interventions.
In this paper we describe a sample of birth mothers participating in an adoption study. Many women reported lifetime tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use and cessation of use during pregnancy. Clinical characteristics (self worth, depression, anxiety and novelty seeking) of women exhibiting various patterns of use and discontinuation during pregnancy were examined.
Methods
Participants
Data were derived from the Early Growth and Development Study (EGDS), an ongoing, longitudinal multi-site study of adopted children, adoptive families, and birth parents. The primary goal of the EGDS is to examine the interplay of genes and environment on social and emotional development during early childhood. The EGDS drew its sample from 33 adoption agencies in 10 states across three regions in the United States: Northwest, Southwest, and Mid-Atlantic. These agencies reflect the full range of U.S. adoption agencies: public, private, religious, secular, those favoring open adoptions, and those favoring closed adoptions. Further information about the sample and recruitment methods have been described in detail elsewhere.17
The current study focused on substance use during pregnancy and therefore examined data from the birth mothers exclusively. Five hundred thirty women were interviewed between February 2003 and August 2006. Four hundred forty-eight provided complete data with respect to substance use, and were included in the analyses. Age at the time of assessment ranged from 14 to 48 years with an average age of 24.1 (SD = 6.3 years). The majority of individuals were single Caucasian women who had completed high school and some type of trade school, and reported an annual household income of less than $20,000. Demographic information is listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Mean | SD | |
---|---|---|
Age (in years) | 24.1 | 6.3 |
Marital status | n | % |
Single | 332 | 62.6 |
Married | 47 | 8.8 |
Divorced | 32 | 6.0 |
Other or did not answer | 119 | 22.5 |
Race and ethnicity | n | % |
White, non-Hispanic | 368 | 69.4 |
Black | 55 | 10.4 |
Hispanic | 10 | 3.8 |
Asian | 7 | 1.3 |
Native American | 5 | 1.0 |
More than one race or ethnicity | 12 | 4.3 |
Did not answer | 52 | 9.8 |
Mean educational level | Completed high school and trade school | |
Mode of educational attainment | High school graduate | |
Mean personal annual income | $7,416 | |
Median household income | < $20,000 |
Procedure
Participants completed in-person assessments at approximately four months postpartum using mailed questionnaires, interview administered questions, and computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI) that were administered privately to facilitate confidentiality and increase the likelihood of candid responses. A trained interviewer met the birth mother at a location convenient to her, most often her home, to conduct the in-person assessment.
Consent
The study was designed to maintain appropriate protection of participants by approaching potential participants after completion of adoption procedures so as not to influence their decision about adoption. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the George Washington University Medical Center.
Measures
Lifetime Alcohol and Illicit Drug Use, Date of Last Use, and Patterns of Use
For the purposes of clarity in this paper, we use the term “substance use” to include tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs and prescription narcotics used other than prescribed. The term, “illicit drug use” describes the use of illicit drugs or prescription medications, specifically opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates or non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, used other than prescribed. Substance use was assessed using a CAPI version of the Composite International Diagnostic Instrument- Short Form (CIDI-SF).18 The modules pertaining to substance use were analyzed to assess the date of last use, frequency, and patterns of use of alcohol, marijuana (marijuana or hashish), painkillers (prescription opiates), sedatives (barbiturates and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics), hallucinogens (LSD, MDMA, mescaline), inhalants, amphetamines (included methamphetamine and prescription psychostimulants), cocaine, heroin, and tranquilizers (benzodiazepines).
Cigarette Smoking During Pregnancy
Information about cigarette smoking was obtained using the Pregnancy History Calendar derived from the Life History Calendar (LHC) method, a well-validated method for obtaining retrospective data.19 Questions were answered by birth mothers using the CAPI method, and their responses were kept private from the interviewer, thereby maximizing participants’ comfort in providing honest responses.
Self Worth
Self worth was assessed using a CAPI version of the Adult Self-Perception Profile (ASPP), a 50-item scale measuring global and domain-specific self worth.20 Each item includes two statements, one reflecting positive self worth, the other reflecting negative self worth. For example, one item reads, "Some adults like the way they are leading their lives BUT other adults don't like the way they are leading their lives." Participants were asked to select which statement was most like them, then rate whether the statement is "really true for me" or "sort of true for me." Each item is then scored from 1 to 4 with 1 indicating lowest self worth and 4 indicating the highest. Only the six-item global self worth subscale was used for analysis in this study (Cronbach’s alpha = .85). Thus, possible scores for this subscale ranged from 6 (lowest self-worth) to 24 (highest possible self worth).
Novelty seeking
Novelty seeking was assessed using the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI),21 which was mailed to participants for completion prior to the in-person interview. Novelty seeking is one of four temperaments measured by the broader 240-item TCI, which assesses several domains of personality. Only the novelty seeking subscale was hypothesized to be associated with substance use cessation; it was found to have adequate internal consistency in the current study (Cronbach’s alpha = .83).
Depression and Anxiety
Depression was assessed using a CAPI version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). This 21-item self-report scale assesses physical and psychological manifestations of depression.22 Anxiety was assessed using a CAPI version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI),23 a 21-item self-report scale, which measures subjective, somatic, and panic-related symptoms of anxiety. Internal consistency for the BDI and BAI were .89 and .88 for the current sample.
Analyses
Discontinuation rates were calculated for tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs. Use of prescription narcotics other than as prescribed was included in the category of “illicit drug use”. Clinical characteristics of nonusers, pregnancy quitters and persistent users were examined. Analyses were performed for both casual users (i.e., women reporting any lifetime use but who did not endorse any DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence) and serious users (i.e., those who reported lifetime use and at least one DSM-IV criteria for substance dependence). Clinical characteristics of women who discontinued some substances, but not others, were examined in terms of specific substance classes (i.e., tobacco versus alcohol versus illicit drugs). Mean scores on the BDI, BAI, TCI (novelty seeking subscale) and ASPP (general self worth subscale) were compared across groups of participants using one-way analysis of variance for each comparison. All analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 17 for Windows, SPSS Inc.
Results
Patterns of substance use and cessation
Lifetime use and discontinuation during pregnancy for each substance are listed in Table 2. Prior to pregnancy, alcohol was most commonly used substance (89.7%), followed by tobacco (70.5%), marijuana (25.4%) and painkillers (12.9%). Women were most likely to discontinue illicit drugs (73.7 – 100%), and least likely to discontinue tobacco (22.2%), with alcohol desistence midway between the two (64.7%).
Table 2.
Use prior to pregnancy | Discontinued during pregnancy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
n | % of total | n | % of users | |
Alcohol | 402 | 89.7 | 260 | 64.7 |
Tobacco | 316 | 70.5 | 70 | 22.2 |
Illicit drugs | ||||
Marijuana | 114 | 25.4 | 99 | 86.8 |
Painkillers (Prescription opiates) |
58 | 12.9 | 57 | 98.3 |
Amphetamines | 38 | 8.5 | 37 | 97.4 |
Sedatives (barbiturates and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics) | 35 | 7.8 | 29 | 82.9 |
Cocaine | 25 | 5.6 | 24 | 96.0 |
Tranquilizers (benzodiazepines) | 19 | 4.2 | 14 | 73.7 |
Hallucinogens | 12 | 2.7 | 12 | 100 |
Inhalants | 8 | 1.8 | 8 | 100 |
Heroin | 5 | 1.1 | 5 | 100 |
Used at least one substance |
422 | 94.2 | ||
Used more than one substance | 337 | 75.2 | ||
Used tobacco, alcohol and at least one other substance | 110 | 24.6 |
Cessation and measured clinical characteristics
In Table 3, women were grouped into the following categories: nonusers (never used any substance during lifetime), pregnancy quitters (lifetime use, with discontinuation during pregnancy) and persistent users (lifetime and pregnancy use). Women who continued any substance were categorized as persistent users, even if some substances were discontinued. Persistent users exhibited significantly higher depression, anxiety and novelty seeking than pregnancy quitters. Furthermore, self worth was higher in pregnancy quitters compared to persistent users. Nonusers reported the lowest anxiety, depression and novelty seeking traits and highest self worth. The differences were statistically significant between all groups as well as between pregnancy quitters and persistent users. Controlling for marital status, household income and highest level of educational achievement did not affect the statistical significance of the results. Correlation coefficients for anxiety, depression, self worth and novelty seeking were: .245*, .230*, −.231*, .160*, respectively (*p < .05).
Table 3.
Self worth* | Depression† | Anxiety‡ | Novelty seeking§ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Nonusers (never used in lifetime) |
26 | 19.4 | 3.5 | 5.3 | 6.4 | 4.4 | 5.1 | 9.2 | 3.5 |
Pregnancy quitters (Lifetime use, quit during pregnancy) |
161 | 18.2 | 3.9 | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.0 | 6.9 | 10.0 | 4.0 |
Persistent users Use throughout pregnancy) |
261 | 17.0 | 4.5 | 12.5 | 10.0 | 11.0 | 9.1 | 11.0 | 3.7 |
F (Nonusers excluded) |
7.876 | 13.890 | 13.291 | 5.096 | |||||
p (Nonusers excluded) |
< .05 | < .001 | < .001 | < .05 |
Adult Self-Perception Profile, Global Self Worth Subscale,
Beck Depression Inventory,
Beck Anxiety Inventory,
Temperament and Character Inventory.
Table 4 focuses on serious users, comparing those who discontinued substance use during pregnancy with those who did not. Differences in depression, anxiety and self worth between pregnancy quitters and persistent users became more pronounced, with persistent users exhibiting higher depression, anxiety, and significantly lower self worth compared to pregnancy quitters. Among serious users, novelty seeking did not differ between pregnancy quitters and persistent users. Controlling for marital status, household income and highest level of educational achievement did not affect the statistical significance of the results. Correlation coefficients for anxiety, depression, self-worth and novelty seeking were: .248*, .240*, −.212*, .021, respectively (*p < .05).
Table 4.
Self wortha | Depression† | Anxiety‡ | Novelty seeking§ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Never exhibited serious use in lifetime | 239 | 18.6 | 3.8 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 6.4 | 9.8 | 3.8 |
Lifetime serious use, quit during pregnancy |
108 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 12.5 | 8.5 | 10.4 | 7.0 | 11.3 | 3.8 |
Lifetime serious use continuing through pregnancy | 101 | 16.1 | 5.0 | 15.5 | 11.9 | 14.2 | 11.1 | 11.4 | 3.8 |
F (serious users only) | 8.522 | 15.262 | 19.406 | .061 | |||||
p (serious users only) | < .01 | < .001 | < .001 | NS |
Adult Self-Perception Profile, Global Self Worth Subscale,
Beck Depression Inventory,
Beck Anxiety Inventory,
Temperament and Character Inventory.
Table 5 describes the analysis of only polysubstance users (used tobacco, alcohol and one or more illicit drugs use prior to pregnancy) (n = 110). In this group, the number of classes of substances discontinued was associated with differences in measured depression and anxiety. Women who discontinued all classes (first row) exhibited the lowest depression and anxiety. The largest group among polysubstance users (n = 60), those who discontinued alcohol and illicit drugs, but continued using tobacco throughout pregnancy, reported higher depression and anxiety. The third group, those who discontinued illicit drugs, but continued using tobacco and alcohol, showed even higher depression and anxiety. Finally, women who continued use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs throughout pregnancy exhibited the highest levels of depression and anxiety. Measured self worth showed a trend in the anticipated direction though differences did not reach statistical significance. Notably, while differences in novelty seeking among all groups did not reach statistical significance, those who did not quit any substances during pregnancy appeared to exhibit higher novelty seeking relative to other groups.
Table 5.
Self worth* | Depression† | Anxiety‡ | Novelty seeking§ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Quit all substances | 21 | 18.6 | 3.8 | 11.0 | 8.1 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 11.5 | 4.1 |
Quit alcohol and illicit drugs only |
60 | 16.5 | 4.5 | 14.4 | 8.8 | 12.7 | 9.4 | 11.2 | 3.8 |
Quit illicit drugs only |
22 | 15.6 | 4.4 | 15.7 | 12.7 | 13.7 | 12.1 | 11.5 | 3.6 |
Quit none | 7 | 13.4 | 6.5 | 24.1 | 14.3 | 22.9 | 11.3 | 15.6 | 2.8 |
Total | 110 | ||||||||
F | 2.819 | 3.146 | 3.166 | 2.823 | |||||
p | NS | < .05 | < .05 | NS |
Adult Self-Perception Profile, Global Self Worth Subscale,
Beck Depression Inventory,
Beck Anxiety Inventory,
Temperament and Character Inventory.
NS = not statistically significant.
Poly-substance users were women who reported use of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs prior to pregnancy.
Discussion
In this study of birth mothers completed an adoption plan, we examined discontinuation of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use during pregnancy among several measures with established relevance to cessation of abused substances: self worth, depression, anxiety and novelty seeking. Using computer-assisted personal interviews (CAPI) and the Life History Calendar (LHC) method, this study found that many women discontinued substance use during pregnancy, and statistically significant associations were observed between cessation of substances and the risk factors measured. Associations between discontinuation and self worth, depression, and anxiety were more pronounced when serious substance users were examined separately, suggesting that these factors may be more important in individuals with substance dependence. Furthermore, the severity of depression and anxiety was indirectly proportional to the number of substance classes discontinued, suggesting that depression and anxiety symptoms may have interfered with attempts to discontinue tobacco, alcohol or illicit drug use during pregnancy.
The higher prevalence of persistent prenatal tobacco use compared to alcohol and illicit drug use observed in our sample mirrors reports patterns of prenatal substance use nationally.24 While actual cessation rates of alcohol and tobacco use were lower in our sample (64.7% and 22.2%, respectively) than in the general population of pregnant women (69% and 58%, respectively),24 they are similar to those reported in other samples of low-income pregnant women who did not choose adoption placement (50–80% for alcohol and 12.6–28 % for tobacco, respectively).25–27 The prevalence of marijuana use during pregnancy in our sample was at least 3% (i.e., 15 out of 448 women did not discontinue use during pregnancy), similar to the prevalence reported in two large multi-site studies.28 Thus, despite the fact that women in this study chose adoption placement, cessation rates are consistent with those observed in women with otherwise similar sociodemographic characteristics who chose parenting.
Observations of novelty seeking were difficult to interpret. In our sample, novelty seeking distinguished users from nonusers (Table 3), and casual from serious users (Table 4). These patterns were not surprising, as novelty seeking may increase the risk of substance use disorders.12 However, its association with substance cessation during pregnancy was less robust for casual users, and not significant in serious users. Furthermore, among the polysubstance users (Table 5), novelty seeking appeared to distinguish between women who did not discontinue illicit drug use during pregnancy from those who did. It has been suggested that novelty seeking may be associated with more socially deviant behavior, and may mediate the association between affective disorders and the development of substance use disorders.29 Our observations support this hypothesis. However, with regards to cessation during pregnancy, particularly for those with substance dependence, other factors may be more important.
Patterns of discontinuation of substances and the effects of social pressure
The patterns of use and discontinuation observed in this study raise some interesting questions about what factors may be important in behavior change during pregnancy. Women were most likely to discontinue illicit drugs, followed by alcohol, and were least likely to discontinue tobacco use. In fact, illicit drug use cessation occurred in women who had relatively high levels of depression and anxiety, whereas smoking cessation failed to occur in women with significantly lower levels. Our findings mirror other studies of pregnant substance abusers25–27 as well as epidemiologic data on substance use during pregnancy showing the greatest prevalence of cigarette smoking in pregnant women, followed by alcohol use, with illicit drug use being the least common.7,24
These results seem contrary to commonly held notions of the “addictive potential” of different substances. The World Health Organization (WHO) uses animal self-administration data as a baseline for assessing a drug's abuse liability.30 By WHO animal-testing criteria, cocaine is most highly addictive, with alcohol less addictive, and nicotine even less addictive. One would expect, then, that women in the study would be least likely to quit cocaine and amphetamines, and most likely to quit smoking. However, the opposite was true. In addition to the physiological issues that affect the application of animal models to human behavior, it is likely that psychological factors and social pressure influenced women to discontinue one drug class versus another. For example, there may have been differences in perceived harm to the fetus between different substances, with more stigmatized substances such as illicit drugs seeming more harmful than legal substances such as tobacco and alcohol. While it is also possible that factors related to pregnancy itself such as changes in energy, appetite, or other physiologic symptoms contributed to a preference of licit versus illicit substances, it is likely that social expectations contributed to motivation to change drug use behavior. The importance of social pressures is further supported by the observation that women who continued illicit drug use throughout pregnancy exhibited higher levels of novelty seeking, which has been associated with greater social deviance29 compared to women who continued cigarette smoking and alcohol use only.
Another result that suggests social pressure was important in cessation during pregnancy is the observation the majority of women who discontinued substance use did so during the second and third trimesters, when the pregnancy became increasingly physically apparent to others. While it is difficult to determine whether their cessation coincided with knowledge of pregnancy alone, it is possible that as the pregnancy progressed and became more physically apparent, motivation to quit was affected by how they were perceived by themselves and others. Continued use of cocaine, for example, may be felt by women, and viewed by others, as a sign of flagrant disregard for the health a growing fetus, whereas drinking alcohol or smoking cigarettes may evoke milder forms of social condemnation. These social pressures during pregnancy make this time particularly opportune for intervention and treatment of substance use disorders in women.
Prenatal drug exposure versus genetic transmission
In addition to the contribution to the prevention of various sequelae of prenatal drug exposure to tobacco, alcohol and illicit drugs, our findings may also have methodological implications. While the association of prenatal drug exposure and internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in offspring has been widely documented,31–33 the mechanism of causality remains unclear. It can be tempting to ascribe offspring behavioral problems to the effects of in utero exposure. However, our findings suggest that women who use drugs during pregnancy differ in important ways from those who do not. That is, they may carry inherited traits that, when passed on to their offspring, may contribute to the development of such problems as ADHD and substance use disorders, both of which have been associated with prenatal drug exposure.34,35 Stated differently, in utero exposure to substances is confounded with genetic risk factors in maternal substance abusers which themselves may increase the risk for child behavior problems through both genetic and gene-environment interactions both prenatally and postnatally.36,37
Implications for intervention
Pregnancy may be a time during which better substance abuse treatment outcomes can be achieved because of the emergence of new motivating factors that have the potential to support positive behavior change.38 It has been suggested that cessation of substance use during pregnancy involves different correlates than cessation in non-pregnant adult populations10 and that pregnancy itself may represent a teachable moment in a substance abuser’s life.39 Thus, public health efforts and current obstetrical screening and interventions have focused on a substantial minority of women who are responsive to brief prenatal interventions, based on the assumption that knowledge of the deleterious effects of substance use on a growing fetus provides motivation to abstain during pregnancy.39,40 However, the prevalence of continued use during pregnancy, especially of cigarette smoking,4,7,24 highlights the need for a better understanding of motivational factors during pregnancy.
Beyond general intrinsic factors (sense of self-control, concern about individual health) and general extrinsic factors (social pressure, threat of legal problems), pregnancy may be associated with pregnancy-specific motivation (concern for fetal health) and parenthood motivation (being a good role model to children).41 The observation that many women in this study made significant changes despite making an adoption plan for their child suggests that there may be advantages to delivering interventions specifically designed to build upon the motivating aspects of pregnancy. As motivational interviewing techniques have been successful in the treatment of adult substance abusers42 and family-based motivational interviewing techniques capitalize on the investment parents have for their children in bringing about changes in parenting style,43,44 such approaches also may be particularly effective for motivating women to stop substance use during pregnancy.
Limitations
While substance use versus discontinuation was associated with measured characteristics in the hypothesized direction, causality cannot be inferred. Depression, anxiety, and lower self worth may have interfered with active attempts to quit, or diminished interest in making an attempt. Alternatively, failure to quit may have increased vulnerability to anxiety or depression and diminished self-esteem. There may have been other factors that were not examined in this study that affected substance use.
Next, data collected in this study depended on the accuracy of subjects’ memories, which does not permit the same degree of accuracy as could be achieved with a prospective design. Furthermore, as participants reported on all measures, reporting bias may have inflated the associations between self worth, depression, anxiety and substance use. However, the use of computer-assisted personal interviews,45 combined with the well-validated life history calendar method for obtaining retrospective data19 promoted optimal accuracy given the ethical and methodological constraints of the adoption design. Furthermore, the rates of discontinuation (greatest with illicit drugs, lowest with cigarette smoking) as well as timing of discontinuation (greater rate of discontinuation as pregnancy progressed) are both consistent with those observed in other, larger samples to date7,24 lending validity to our findings. While corroboration of substance use reports by a household member could have strengthened our results, retrospective reports by pregnant smokers have been shown to be quite accurate when compared to family reports.46
Finally, while examination of birth mothers in an adoption study allowed for a sample in which substance use and the clinical characteristics measured were prevalent, there may have been factors unique to these women that impacted substance use, and generalizeability of findings to all pregnant women may be limited. For example, reasons given by women who choose adoption placement over parenthood include financial constraints, unreadiness for parenthood, desire to finish school, pressure from family, and the desire to provide their babies with families.47 Any or all of these reasons may have affect the variables examined in this study.
Conclusion
Pregnancy is a time of both urgency and opportunity for the treatment of substance use disorders in women. The present and future health of both mother and fetus are at stake. The association between cessation rates and clinical characteristics observed in this study raises the possibility that by specifically intervening to reduce anxiety and depression while supporting self worth, the process of behavior change in this important time may be facilitated.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by Grant R01 HD042608 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIDA, and the Office of the Director, NIH, U.S. PHS, Bethesda, MD (PI Years 1–5: Dr. Reiss; PI Years 6–10: Dr. Leve). The writing of this manuscript was partially supported by grant DA020585 from NIDA, NIMH, and the Office of the Director, U.S. PHS, Bethesda, MD (Dr. Neiderhiser).
Footnotes
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.
Declaration of Interest
Dr. Massey has received research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, CeNeRx BioPharma, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and serves on the speaker’s bureau for Reckitt Benckiser. Dr. Lieberman has received research grants from the Dalio Family Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CeNeRx BioPharma, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and speaker’s honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs. Reiss, Leve, Shaw and Neiderhiser report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.
References
- 1.Kuczkowski KM. The effects of drug abuse on pregnancy. Curr Opin in Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:578–585. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f1bf17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaltenbach K. Addiction in pregnancy-consequences for the child. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:38–41. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pratt TC, McGloin JM, Fearn NE. Maternal cigarette smoking during pregnancy and criminal/deviant behavior: a meta-analysis. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006;50:672–690. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06286623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Substance Use During Pregnancy 2008. [Accessed September 10, 2008];Office of Applied Studies Web site. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh.htm.
- 5.Trussell J. The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception. 2007;75:168–170. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hellerstedt WL, Pirie PL, Lao HA, et al. Differences in preconceptional and prenatal behaviors in women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:663–666. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bailey JA, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Abbott RD. Men’s and Women’s Patterns of Substance Use Around Pregnancy. Birth. 2008;35:50–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marcus SM. Depression during pregnancy: rates, risks and consequences. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;16:15–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fitzsimons H, Tuten M, Vaidya H, Jones H. Mood disorders affect drug treatment success of drug-dependent pregnant women. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;32:19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wakschlag LS, Pickett KE, Middlecamp MK, Walton LL, Tenzer P, Leventhal BL. Pregnant smokers who quit, pregnant smokers who don’t; does history of problem behavior make a difference? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2449–2460. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, et al. Prevalence and Co-occurrence of Substance Use Disorders and Independent Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:807–816. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.8.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lukasiewicz M, Neveu X, Blecha L, Falissard B, Reynaud M, Gasquet I. Pathways to substance-related disorder: a structural model approach exploring the influence of temperament, character, and childhood adversity in a national cohort of prisoners. Alcohol Alcohol. 2008;43:287–295. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agm183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Howard MO, Kivlahan D, Walker RD. Cloninger’s tridimensional theory of personality and psychopathology: applications to substance use disorders. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:48–66. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Helmus TC, Downey KK, Arfken CL, Henderson MJ, Schuster CR. Novelty seeking as a predictor of treatment retention for heroin dependent cocaine users. Drug Alc Depend. 2001;61:287–295. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00153-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stein JA, Leslie MB, Nyamathi A. Relative contributions of parent substance use and childhood maltreatment to chronic homelessness, depression, and substance abuse problems among homeless women: mediating roles of self-esteem and abuse in adulthood. Child Abuse Negl. 2002;26:1011–1027. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00382-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EM, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995;273:1106–1112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Leve LD, Neiderhiser JM, Ge X, et al. The Early Growth and Development Study: A prospective adoption design. Twin Research. 2007;10:84–95. doi: 10.1375/twin.10.1.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen H-U. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short-Form (CIDI-SF) Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7:171–185. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Caspi A, Moffit TE, Thornton A, et al. The Life History Calendar: A research and clinical assessment method for collecting retrospective event-history data. Int J Methods in Psychiatr Res. 1995;6:101–114. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Messner J, Harter S. Manual for the Adult Self-Perception Profile. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e348–e359. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cloninger CR, Pryzbeck TR, Svrakic DM, Wetzel RD. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A Guide to Its Development and Use. St. Louis: Center for Psychobiology of Personality, Washington University; 1994. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beck AT. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Substance Use During Pregnancy 2002–2007. [Accessed March 30, 2010];Office of Applied Studies Web site. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh.htm.
- 25.O’Connor MJ, Whaley SE. Alcohol Use in Pregnant Low Income Women. J Stud Alc. 2003;64:773–783. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2003.64.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Okene JK, Ma Y, Zapka JG, Pbert LA, Goins KV, Stoddard AM. Spontaneous Cessation of Smoking and Alcohol Use Among Low-Income Pregnant Women. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23:150–159. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00492-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Orr ST, Newton E, Tarwater PM, Weismiller D. Factors Associated with Prenatal Smoking Among Black Women in Eastern North Carolina. Matern Child Health J. 2005;9:245–252. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Arria AM, Derauf C, LaGasse LL, et al. Methamphetamine and Other Substance Use During Pregnancy: Preliminary Estimates From the Infant Development, Environment and Lifestyle (IDEAL) Study. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10:293–302. doi: 10.1007/s10995-005-0052-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chakroun N, Doron J, Swendsen J. Substance use, affective problems and personality traits: A test of two association models. Encephale. 2004;30:564–569. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95471-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Addiction-Producing Drugs. WHO Bulletin. 1981;59:225. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Glantz MD, Chambers JC. Prenatal drug exposure effects on subsequent vulnerability to drug abuse. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18:893–922. doi: 10.1017/s0954579406060445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dixon DR, Kurtz PF, Chin MD. A systematic review of challenging behaviors in children exposed prenatally to substances of abuse. Res Dev Disabil. 2008;29:483–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ashford J, Van Lier PAC, Timmermans M, Cuipers P, Koot HM. Prenatal Smoking and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems in Children Studied from Childhood to Late Adolescence. J Am Acad Chil Adol Psychiatr. 2008;47:779. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318172eefb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chapman K, Tarter R, Kirisci L, Cornelius MD. Childhood Neurobehavior Disinhibition Amplifies Risk of Substance Use Disorder: Interaction of Parental History and Prenatal Alcohol Exposure. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007;18:219–224. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3180327907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ebstein RP, Novick O, Umansky R, et al. Dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of Novelty Seeking. Nature Genetics. 1996;12:78–80. doi: 10.1038/ng0196-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ge X, Conger RD, Remi J, et al. The developmental interface between nature and nurture: A mutual influence model of child antisocial behavior and parent behaviors. Dev Psychol. 1996;32:574–589. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Leve LD, Harold GT, Ge X, et al. Structured Parenting of Toddlers at High Versus Low Genetic Risk: Two Pathways to Child Problems. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48:1102–1109. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181b8bfc0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM. Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:156–170. doi: 10.1093/her/18.2.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Melvin CL, Dolan-Mullen P, Windsor RA, Whiteside HP, Jr, Goldenberg RL. Recommended cessation counseling for pregnant women who smoke: A review of the evidence. Tobacco Control. 2000;9 Suppl. III:iii80–iii84. doi: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stotts AL, DiClemente CC, Carbonari JP, Mullen PD. Pregnancy smoking cessation: A case of mistaken identity. Addict Behav. 1996;21:459–471. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Curry SJ, McBride C, Grothaus L, Lando H, Pirie P. Motivation for Smoking Cessation among Pregnant Women. Psychol Addict Behav. 2001;15:126–132. doi: 10.1037//0893-164x.15.2.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miller WR. The effectiveness of treatment for substance abuse problems. Reasons for optimism. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9:93–102. doi: 10.1016/0740-5472(92)90075-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gardner F, Connell A, Trentacosta CJ, Shaw DS, Dishion TJ, Wilson MN. Moderators of Outcome in a Brief Family-Centered Intervention for Preventing Early Problem Behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77:543–553. doi: 10.1037/a0015622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dishion TJ, Shaw D, Connell A, Gardner F, Weaver C, Wilson M. The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: Preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Devel. 2008;79:1395–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867–873. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Heath AC, Knopik VS, Madden PA, et al. Accuracy of Mothers' Retrospective Reports of Smoking During Pregnancy: Comparison with Twin Sister Informant Ratings. Twin Res. 2003;6:297–301. doi: 10.1375/136905203322296656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Edwards CE, Williams CL. Adopting Change: Birth Mothers in Maternity Homes Today. Gender Soc. 2000;14:160–183. [Google Scholar]