Although the optic nerve head is the likely site of axonal injury in glaucoma, little is known about the initial cellular responses to elevated intraocular pressure exposure. The authors used microarray analysis and their rat glaucoma model to identify cell proliferation and potential interleukin-6 type cytokine signaling as important early nerve head responses.
Abstract
Purpose.
In glaucoma, the optic nerve head (ONH) is the principal site of initial axonal injury, and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the predominant risk factor. However, the initial responses of the ONH to elevated IOP are unknown. Here the authors use a rat glaucoma model to characterize ONH gene expression changes associated with early optic nerve injury.
Methods.
Unilateral IOP elevation was produced in rats by episcleral vein injection of hypertonic saline. ONH mRNA was extracted, and retrobulbar optic nerve cross-sections were graded for axonal degeneration. Gene expression was determined by microarray and quantitative PCR (QPCR) analysis. Significantly altered gene expression was determined by multiclass analysis and ANOVA. DAVID gene ontology determined the functional categories of significantly affected genes.
Results.
The Early Injury group consisted of ONH from eyes with <15% axon degeneration. By array analysis, 877 genes were significantly regulated in this group. The most significant upregulated gene categories were cell cycle, cytoskeleton, and immune system process, whereas the downregulated categories included glucose and lipid metabolism. QPCR confirmed the upregulation of cell cycle-associated genes and leukemia inhibitory factor (Lif) and revealed alterations in expression of other IL-6–type cytokines and Jak-Stat signaling pathway components, including increased expression of IL-6 (1553%). In contrast, astrocytic glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap) message levels were unaltered, and other astrocytic markers were significantly downregulated. Microglial activation and vascular-associated gene responses were identified.
Conclusions.
Cell proliferation and IL-6–type cytokine gene expression, rather than astrocyte hypertrophy, characterize early pressure-induced ONH injury.
Experimentally elevated IOP in animals produces glaucoma-like retinal ganglion cell (RGC) and optic nerve axonal loss and a characteristic remodeling of the optic nerve head (ONH) that includes the rearrangement of glial cells and the deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Although experimental glaucoma models have been produced in a number of species, primate and rodent models are the most extensively used. In both human and experimental glaucoma, there is a general consensus that the ONH is the primary site of initial glaucomatous injury to RGC axons.1,2 Recently, sophisticated 3-D histomorphometric and biomechanical studies have been used to examine some of the earliest morphologic and structural ONH responses in experimental glaucoma attributed to elevated IOP in primates.3–11 However, relatively few studies have examined the early cellular responses of the ONH to elevated IOP exposure. Such studies should help us understand how the ONH cells respond to an environment altered by elevated IOP and how these responses might affect axonal integrity.
To examine the response to acute IOP elevation, the anterior chamber can be cannulated to allow IOP to be elevated for up to a few hours without altering retinal perfusion. After these acute elevations, abnormalities in axonal transport, including the accumulation of mitochondria, dynein, neurotrophins and their receptors, and the distribution of axonal and astrocytic proteins have been observed.12–17
For longer IOP elevation, a number of techniques are available to obstruct aqueous outflow and produce glaucoma-like optic nerve degeneration.18–23 In initial studies using our chronic, hypertonic, saline-induced rat glaucoma model and immunohistochemistry, we found characteristic glaucoma-like changes in the rat ONH ECM. As early as 11 days after IOP elevation, we observed depositions of collagen IV, collagen VI, and laminin.24 Next, we used immunohistochemistry to study the chronology of morphologic and protein distribution changes in the ONH. At 3 days after IOP elevation, we observed decreased labeling in ONH glial columns for gap junction protein alpha 1 (connexin 43, Gja1) and increases in a cell proliferation marker.25 These changes were followed at 1 week by decreased labeling for neurotrophins and Gfap, increased vascular labeling of collagen VI, and the appearance of swollen, degenerating axons in the ONH and focal lesions in optic nerve cross-sections. In a separate study using laser-induced IOP elevation, an accumulation of the retrograde transport motor dynein was observed in the ONH at approximately the same duration of IOP elevation.26
More recently, we have used our glaucoma model to determine gene expression changes in extensively injured ONH.27 As part of that study, we also reported expression changes in a few specific genes in ONH from eyes with focal optic nerve injuries (<50% axon degeneration). These genes had all been found to be highly regulated in ONH with extensive nerve injury. Among these, we found significant upregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (Timp1), fibulin 2 (Fbln2), and tenascin c (Tnc) as well as downregulation of aquaporin 4 (Aqp4) in these focally injured ONH. In the study presented here, we greatly expand these initial findings by using microarray analysis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) to identify the gene expression changes in glaucoma model ONH from eyes with <15% optic nerve axon degeneration attributed to elevated IOP exposure.
Methods
Glaucoma Model
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by the Oregon Health and Sciences University (OHSU) Animal Care and Use Committee. Unilateral IOP elevation was produced in 8-month-old, male Brown Norway rats by episcleral vein injection of hypertonic saline.28 Rats were housed in low-level constant light to minimize circadian IOP fluctuation.29,30 IOP was measured frequently in anesthetized animals, primarily using a tonometer (Tono-PenXL; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).29,31 For some glaucoma model eyes included in the PCR studies, IOP history was collected using a rebound tonometer (TonoLab; Colonial Medical Supply, Franconia, NH), as described.32 Except where noted, tissues were collected at 5 weeks after injection.
Optic Nerve Grading
Retrobulbar optic nerves were collected, postfixed, embedded in Spurr's resin, and cross-sectioned for light microscopic evaluation.27 Each nerve was graded for injury, on a scale from 1 (normal nerve) to 5 (extensive degeneration affecting nearly all axons), by at least five independent observers, and the mean was defined as the injury grade for that nerve. Previous studies using transmission electron microscopy have demonstrated that each unit increase in the injury grade is equivalent to degeneration affecting approximately 12% to 15% of the optic nerve axons.30
ONH Dissection
Enucleated globes were rapidly chilled in cold phosphate-buffered saline, and the anterior segment, lens, and retina were removed. Using a trephine, the ONH, including the initial portion of myelinated optic nerve, was dissected from the posterior pole of the globe. The ONH was then shortened to a uniform 0.4 mm in length using a razor blade and custom-designed matrix. This initial, largely unmyelinated ONH segment included the pia and pigmented peripapillary border tissue. The dissected ONH was then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C before RNA extraction.
RNA Purification and Amplification
RNA was isolated by first sonicating the frozen nerve heads in 30 μL extraction buffer (Pico-Pure RNA Isolation Kit; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) using an MS 0.5 probe (UP50H Ultrasonic Processor; Hielscher USA., Inc., Ringwood, NJ) in accordance with the manufacturer's directions, including DNase treatment. The purified RNA was quantified (RiboGreen RNA Quantitation Kit; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 25-ng aliquots underwent two rounds of linear amplification (MessageAmp aRNA Amplification Kit; Ambion, Austin, TX) yielding ample aRNA for both microarray analysis and QPCR. The integrity of the amplified RNA was verified (2100 Bioanalyzer; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).
cDNA Microarrays
Aliquots of amplified RNA were reverse transcribed and dye-labeled at the OHSU Gene Microarray Shared Resource (http://www.ohsu.edu/gmsr/), which also prepared and processed the cDNA arrays and compiled the data. For each sample, two cDNA arrays (SMCmou8400A and SMCmou6600A) were used, containing a combined total of 15,400 probes. These are listed in Supplementary Table S1, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental, and represent the entire initial release of the National Institute on Aging mouse library (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/cDNA/15k.html). The length of the cDNA probes on these arrays makes them relatively insensitive to sequence differences between closely related species (Morrison JC, et al. IOVS 2005;46:ARVO E-Abstract 1250).33,34 The probes correspond to approximately 8000 individual Entrez gene IDs, 1000 additional transcripts with Unigene designations, and 4000 expressed sequence tags (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez). Each data point is the mean of four technical replicates. Gene expression data from each array were normalized at the facility using a modified Lowess procedure.35 Expression patterns in each ONH were independently determined relative to an ONH RNA reference standard, derived by pooling aliquots from all samples.
In addition to six control (uninjected, fellow eye) ONH, ONH was collected from 21 eyes with cumulative IOP above the control eye ranging from 34 mm Hg to 490 mm Hg. Mean IOP in control eyes, as measured by tonometer (Tono-PenXL; Medtronic), was 28.6 mm Hg. Although most of the glaucoma model ONH was collected at 5 weeks after episcleral vein injection, the analysis included eight ONH from eyes collected at 10 days after the first IOP reading of 35 mm Hg or more, so that gene expression changes that occurred early in the injury process would be enriched in the analysis.
Physiological IOP Elevation Group
In an additional microarray analysis, gene expression changes with physiological IOP elevation were evaluated to enhance the interpretation of the glaucoma model results. These samples were processed simultaneously with the glaucoma model samples from initial RNA amplification through microarray data preprocessing and normalization in a single experiment at the OHSU Microarray Resource. For this group, animals were housed in standard 12-hour light/12-hour dark conditions. Tissues were collected from normal eyes during the dark-phase peak in circadian IOP elevation, when IOP is approximately 10 mm Hg above the light-phase IOP measurement of approximately 21 mm Hg and 2 to 3 mm Hg above the mean IOP of eyes in animals housed in constant, low-level light.29,36 Gene expression alterations in these ONH were independently compared with the control ONH data, described here using the Two Class Unpaired Module of Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM, version 3.02; http://www-stat.stanford.edu/∼tibs/SAM/ provided in the public domain by Stanford University, Stanford, CA). Potential gene expression changes in these eyes do not result in significant axon loss over the lifespan of the rat37 and, therefore, represent noninjurious, physiological circadian responses. Significant changes in expression attributed to physiological IOP elevation (1.3-fold change; 2% false discovery rate [FDR]) were noted and used to assist in interpreting the gene expression changes seen in our glaucoma model.
Definition of the Early ONH Injury Group
We reasoned that the ONH from glaucoma model eyes with minimal optic nerve axon degeneration would most consistently display changes in gene expression associated with the earliest phases of axonal injury. Rather than arbitrarily dividing the experimental ONH into injury groups, we used the following visualization strategy to identify a group of ONH with early injury. First, we ordered the microarray data sets by increasing optic nerve injury grade, including all data from the 6 control and 21 glaucoma model ONH, with nerve injury grades ranging from 1.025 to 5. Then we used the Pattern Discovery module in SAM to identify the significant eigengenes (principal components). The SMCmou8400A and SMCmou6600A array data sets were separately analyzed and significant eigengenes (P < 0.05) from both were plotted against ONH injury grade. Curve fitting and regression analysis were used to determine the statistically significant best fit line for each eigengene. From this analysis, the Early and Advanced Injury groups of arrays were defined (see Results and Fig. 1)
Figure 1.
Definition of the Early and Advanced ONH Injury groups. The Pattern Discovery module in SAM was used to identify the significant eigengenes (principal components) in the microarray data sets arrayed by increasing optic nerve injury grade (6 controls, 21 glaucoma model ONH from eyes with optic nerve injury grades from 1.025 to 5.) Each array data set (SMCmou6600A and SMCmou8400A) was separately analyzed, and significant eigengenes (P < 0.05) from both were plotted. Curve-fitting and regression analysis were used to determine the statistically significant best-fit line for each eigengene, as plotted here. The two array sets yielded nearly identical eigengene patterns for the first two eigengenes. The most significant pattern (Eigengene 1, red lines) on both arrays was a linear response, with maximal change in the most severely injured ONH. The second most significant pattern (Eigengene 2) for both array sets was a fourth-order polynomial curve, with peak changes below injury grade 2 (approximately 15% axons degenerating). This pattern indicated that a large number of significantly affected ONH genes responded maximally to early pressure-induced damage. Based on nerve injury grade and these two eigengene patterns, data from each sample was assigned to 1 of 3 groups for further analysis: Control ONH (untreated eyes), Early ONH Injury (glaucoma model ONH with optic nerve injury grades <2.0, n = 9), and Advanced ONH Injury (glaucoma model ONH with optic nerve injury grades >2.0, n = 12).
Determination of Genes Significantly Changed in Expression by ONH Injury Group
Next the Multiclass Analysis module of SAM (2% FDR) was used to compare the data from the Early Injury group to both the Control and the Advanced Injury group. This analysis identified all genes that were significantly altered in any group comparison. Then ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer posttest were used to identify genes that differed significantly (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons) and were changed in expression by 1.3-fold between groups so that our early injury group analysis identified all genes significantly regulated in early injury compared with the control group. Finally, DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 2008 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) was used to determine significantly regulated functional classes of these genes, using the array probes as background. Official Entrez and Rat genome database (http://rgd.mcw.edu/) gene symbols are used throughout the manuscript to refer to specific genes and their protein products.
QPCR Analysis
QPCR was used to verify microarray analysis findings and to examine the expression of genes not included on our microarrays. In addition to aRNA from all the samples analyzed by microarray, aRNA was also prepared from additional control and glaucoma model ONH to increase the final group sizes (12 control, 20 Early Injury, and 24 Advanced Injury). Mean injury grades for these groups were comparable to those in the microarray study (1.0 ± 0.0, 1.4 ± 0.1, and 3.9 ± 0.3, respectively). ONH aRNA (25 ng) from each experimental sample, along with a standard curve ranging from 1.5 to 200 ng pooled control and experimental ONH aRNA, was reverse transcribed to cDNA for QPCR using a kit (SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Primers for the 60 messages measured by QPCR were designed from rat nucleotide sequences (National Center for Biotechnology Information, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez and Ensembl http://www.ensembl.org/index.html) for products within 350 bases of the target mRNA 3′ polyadenlyation site using appropriate software (Clone Manager, version 9.0; Sci Ed Software, Cary, NC). Primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental. QPCR was performed (LightCycler DNA Master SYBR Green 1 Kit; Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN), and products were verified by sequencing. Each target message was normalized to the average of three glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) measurements on each sample. Gapdh was chosen for normalization because the levels of this message did not differ among groups and there was no significant correlation between ONH Gapdh level and IOP level or optic nerve injury grade. ONH gene expression was compared among three groups: controls (n = 12), Early Injury (optic nerve injury grade <2, n = 20), and Advanced Injury (optic nerve injury grade >2, n = 24). This analysis was designed to specifically examine gene expression changes associated with the earliest injury. Statistical analyses were performed using statistical software packages (Excel [Microsoft, Redmond WA] and Prism [GraphPad, San Diego, CA]).
ONH DNA Quantitation
To determine whether injury from elevated IOP resulted in increased total ONH DNA content, DNA was extracted from comparable whole control and glaucoma model ONH with injury grades in a range similar to those used in the gene expression studies (PicoPure DNA Extraction Kit; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) and was quantitated using an assay kit (Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols.
Results
The Early ONH Injury Group
Optic nerve injury grades were obtained for all samples, and eigengene analysis was used for data visualization to aid in the separation of glaucoma model sample array data, ordered by injury grade, into Early Injury and Advanced Injury groups for further analysis. The results of this eigengene analysis are shown in Figure 1. Note that the two array sets yielded nearly identical eigengene patterns for the first two eigengenes and that four significant patterns were found for each set. The most significant pattern (Eigengene 1) on both arrays was a linear response, with maximal change in the most severely affected ONH. We found that 52% of array probes were significantly correlated to Eigengene 1 (FDR <2%). This eigengene pattern is representative of genes that are regulated, either up or down in proportion to increasing optic nerve injury, likely reflecting changes related to early injury responses as optic nerve involvement becomes more widespread, and of many genes reflecting all the processes secondary to ongoing axon loss. Regression analysis showed that genes upregulated in proportion to injury grade were associated with the gene ontology (GO) categories of extracellular matrix, humoral immune response, lysosome, ribosome, cytoskeleton, cell differentiation, and signaling cascades. Genes that were downregulated in proportion to nerve injury grade included those regulating lipid biosynthesis, glucose metabolism, and mitochondria.
The second most significant pattern (Eigengene 2) for both array sets was a fourth-order polynomial curve, with peak changes in expression below injury grade 2. Fifteen percent of array probes were significantly correlated to this Eigengene pattern, suggesting that a large group of genes demonstrated near maximal changes in expression in ONH from eyes with pressure-induced optic nerve damage of less than grade 2.
Therefore, each sample was assigned to 1 of 3 groups for further analysis: Control ONH (untreated eyes, n = 6) and, based on injury grade and the two most significant eigengene patterns, Early ONH Injury (glaucoma model ONH, injury grades <2.0, n = 9) and Advanced ONH Injury (glaucoma model ONH, injury grade >2.0, n = 12). Table 1 summarizes the injury grade and the cumulative IOP elevation data for the two glaucoma model groups. In the Early Injury group, the mean interval between hypertonic saline injection and tissue collection was 21 ± 9 days. The mean interval between documented IOP elevation (5 mm above mean control eye IOP) and tissue collection was 12 ± 8 days. This group included six of the eyes that were collected at 10 days after the first tonometer (Tono-PenXL; Medtronic) IOP reading of 35 or greater. The peak IOP in the Early Injury group averaged 38.3 ± 1.9 mm Hg. Figure 2 illustrates a typical IOP history for a glaucoma model in the Early Injury group. Figure 3 illustrates an Early Injury group optic nerve lesion. These very early lesions are restricted to, at most, one or a few small, focal areas of the nerve cross-section, with a few degenerating axons intermingled with morphologically normal ones.
Table 1.
Microarray Study: IOP Histories by Experimental Group
| Group | n | Optic Nerve Injury Grade (Mean ± SD) | Cumulative Elevated IOP mm Hg (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | 6 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Early injury (1 < grade < 2) | 9 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 69 ± 25 |
| Advanced injury (2 < grade ≤ 5) | 12 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 251 ± 164 |
Figure 2.
IOP history of a glaucoma model eye in the Early Injury group. On day 0, hypertonic saline was injected into an episcleral vein to induce elevated IOP, which became apparent at day 20.
Figure 3.
The area of lesion in a glaucoma model optic nerve with an injury grade of 1.4. Dark condensed degenerating axons (white arrows) occur in a few small, focal areas of the superior portion of the nerve cross-section, and a swollen axon (white arrowhead) is present. These degenerating axons are intermingled with many morphologically intact axons. The remaining optic nerve appears normal. Scale bar, 50 μm.
Genes Significantly Regulated by Early Injury
The SAM Multiclass and ANOVA analysis yielded a combined total of 877 significantly regulated genes with unique Entrez Gene IDs in the Early Injury group, with 596 upregulated and 281 downregulated genes compared with the control group (Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental). Fifty-four genes were upregulated to greater than 250% of control ONH levels (Table 2), two-thirds of which have functions associated with the cell cycle and cell proliferation. Table 3 lists genes decreased in expression by at least 50% in the Early Injury group. Supplementary Tables S4 and S5, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental, list genes significantly changed in expression in the other between-group comparisons.
Table 2.
Microarray Analysis Genes Most Upregulated in the Early ONH Injury Group Compared with Control Values
| Accession No. | Entrez Gene | Gene Name* | Gene Symbol | Percentage of Control Mean† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG087390 | 21973 | Topoisomerase IIA | Top2a | 1424 |
| BG069098 | 228421 | Kinesin family member 18A | Kif18a | 970 |
| AW547246 | 70021 | 5′-Nucleotidase domain containing 2 | Nt5dc2 | 808 |
| AW550270 | 21923 | Tenascin C | Tnc | 762 |
| BG088644 | 233406 | Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 | Prc1 | 720 |
| BG063624 | 52033 | PDZ binding kinase | Pbk | 698 |
| BG074248 | 110033 | Kinesin family member 22 | Kif22 | 651 |
| BG069168 | 30939 | Pituitary tumor-transforming 1 | Pttg1 | 622 |
| BG073145 | 80986 | Cytoskeleton associated protein 2 | Ckap2 | 608 |
| AW553739 | 22137 | Ttk protein kinase | Ttk | 598 |
| BG065692 | 11504 | Adamts1 | Adamts1 | 593 |
| AU018403 | 51945 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 5, A, 2 | Nr5a2 | 591 |
| BG086805 | 12235 | Budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 | Bub1 | 559 |
| BG088110 | 26934 | Rac GTPase-activating protein 1 | Racgap1 | 555 |
| BG072398 | 14284 | Fos-like antigen 2 (Fosl2), mRNA | Fosl2 | 530 |
| AW553287 | 50706 | Periostin | Postn | 521 |
| BG070106 | 16819 | Lipocalin 2 | Lcn2 | 509 |
| BG079289 | 77022 | RIKEN cDNA 2700099C18 | 2700099C18Rik | 499 |
| BG070105 | 105387 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14 | Akr1c14 | 451 |
| BG072904 | 19361 | RAD51 homolog | Rad51 | 436 |
| BG078299 | 52276 | Cell division cycle associated 8-Borealin | Cdca8 | 429 |
| BG068666 | 71819 | Kinesin family member 23 | Kif23 | 407 |
| BG065826 | 18005 | NIMA-related expressed kinase 2 | Nek2 | 405 |
| BG068948 | 66442 | Spindle pole body component 25 homolog | Spc25 | 385 |
| BG086343 | 56419 | Diaphanous homolog 3 | Diap3 | 376 |
| BG076991 | 12702 | Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 | Socs3 | 371 |
| BG073234 | 211770 | Tribbles homolog 1 | Trib1 | 360 |
| BG073047 | 72119 | TPX2, microtubule-associated protein | Tpx2 | 356 |
| BG088567 | 16009 | Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 | Igfbp3 | 354 |
| BG076937 | 16906 | Lamin B1 | Lmnb1 | 349 |
| BG071031 | 17393 | Matrix metallopeptidase 7, matrylisn | Mmp7 | 336 |
| BG066442 | 16647 | Karyopherin (importin) α2 | Kpna2 | 334 |
| BG080700 | 27279 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12A | Tnfrsf12a | 329 |
| BG079311 | 238076 | Potassium voltage-gated channel, delayed-rectifier, S, 3 | Kcns3 | 328 |
| BG085472 | 12580 | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2C | Cdkn2c | 318 |
| BG073518 | 12428 | Cyclin A2 | Ccna2 | 307 |
| BG068045 | 14425 | UDP-N-acetyl-α-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 | Galnt3 | 304 |
| BG066443 | 11806 | Apolipoprotein A-I | Apoa1 | 303 |
| BG072979 | 108907 | Nucleolar and spindle-associated protein 1 | Nusap1 | 292 |
| BG085966 | 14115 | Fibulin 2 | Fbln2 | 288 |
| BG075693 | 69219 | Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 | Ddah1 | 284 |
| BG067382 | 74107 | Centrosomal protein 55 | Cep55 | 282 |
| BG075357 | 17219 | Minichromosome maintenance deficient 6 | Mcm6 | 281 |
| BG080268 | 14825 | Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 | Cxcl1 | 271 |
| BG069808 | 73710 | Tubulin, β2B | Tubb2b | 269 |
| BG085649 | 216161 | Strawberry notch homolog 2 | Sbno2 | 261 |
| BG080666 | 15937 | Immediate early response 3 | Ier3 | 260 |
| AW537534 | 326618 | Tropomyosin 4 | Tpm4 | 259 |
| BG086929 | 56449 | Cold shock domain protein A | Csda | 255 |
| BG063171 | 76448 | Phostensin RIKEN cDNA 2310014H01 | 2310014H01Rik | 253 |
| BG080690 | 20419 | Shc SH2-domain binding protein 1 | Shcbp1 | 252 |
| BG081419 | 229841 | Centromere protein E | Cenpe | 251 |
| BG071607 | 12457 | CCR4 carbon catabolite repression 4-like | Ccrn4l | 251 |
| BG084556 | 17919 | Myosin Vb | Myo5b | 250 |
Italic gene names indicate functions associated with cell proliferation and mitosis.
Values indicated as percentage of control eye mean, the average of six biologically independent sample values from six separate, independent arrays.
Table 3.
Microarray Analysis Genes Most Downregulated in the Early ONH Injury Group Compared with Control Values
| Accession No. | Entrez Gene | Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Percentage of Control Mean* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG086656 | 11668 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, subfamily A1 | Aldh1a1 | 15 |
| BG073126 | 15902 | Inhibitor of DNA binding 2 | Id2 | 21 |
| BG071519 | 223227 | HMG-box protein (Sox21) | Sox21 | 22 |
| BG080229 | 11676 | Aldolase 3, C isoform-L | Aldoc | 22 |
| BG067929 | 75104 | Monocyte to macrophage differentiation-associated 2-L | Mmd2 | 25 |
| BG087678 | 15360 | 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 2 | Hmgcs2 | 29 |
| BG074398 | 13602 | SPARC-like 1 (hevin) | Sparcl1 | 33 |
| BG080206 | 20255 | Secretogranin III | Scg3 | 34 |
| BG067564 | 21808 | Transforming growth factor, β2 | Tgfb2 | 34 |
| BG073115 | 18027 | Nuclear factor I/A | Nfia | 34 |
| BG080743 | 54418 | Formin 2 | Fmn2 | 35 |
| C85331 | 98582 | KH domain containing 1B | Khdc1b | 35 |
| C77281 | 12388 | Catenin, delta 1 transcript variant 1 | Ctnnd1 | 36 |
| BG069709 | 332175 | Zinc finger, DHHC domain containing 23 | Zdhhc23 | 36 |
| AW543487 | 105727 | Solute carrier family 38, member 1 | Slc38a1 | 38 |
| BG080988 | 244867 | Rho GTPase activating protein 20 | Arhgap20 | 38 |
| BG087491 | 83965 | Ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 5 | Enpp5 | 39 |
| BG078755 | 76267 | Fatty acid desaturase 1-L | Fads1 | 39 |
| BG065883 | 52225 | DNA segment, Chr 4, ERATO Doi 103 | D4Ertd103e | 39 |
| BG082257 | 106861 | Abhydrolase domain containing 3 | Abhd3 | 39 |
| BG086781 | 84505 | SET domain, bifurcated 1 | Setdb1 | 39 |
| BG080351 | 75712 | Transmembrane protein 14A | Tmem14a | 40 |
| BG070174 | 14866 | Glutathione S-transferase, mu 5 | Gstm5 | 41 |
| BG084015 | 107272 | Phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 | Psat1 | 41 |
| BG084178 | 19049 | Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 1B | Ppp1r1b | 41 |
| BG067863 | 70757 | Protein tyrosine phosphatase-like-L | Ptplb | 42 |
| BG073601 | 13167 | Diazepam binding inhibitor | Dbi | 42 |
| BG074397 | 14862 | Glutathione S-transferase, mu 1 | Gstm1 | 42 |
| BG087831 | 16508 | Potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related family, member 2 | Kcnd2 | 42 |
| BG066209 | 231051 | Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed-lineage leukemia 3 | MII3 | 42 |
| BG082752 | 12411 | Cystathionine beta-synthase L | Cbs | 42 |
| BG073940 | 228839 | TGFB-induced factor 2 | Tgif2 | 43 |
| BG073190 | 14860 | Glutathione S-transferase, α4 | Gsta4 | 43 |
| BG064512 | 18631 | Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 11a | Pex11a | 44 |
| AU018835 | 58187 | Claudin 10A | Cldn10a | 44 |
| BG072429 | 226025 | Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 3 | Trpm3 | 44 |
| BG069624 | 234593 | N-myc downstream regulated gene 4 | Ndrg4 | 44 |
| BG088903 | 235180 | Fasciculation and elongation protein zeta 1 | Fez1 | 45 |
| BG069040 | 215821 | D10Bwg1379e | D10Bwg1379e | 45 |
| BG086971 | 11487 | A disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 10 | Adam 10 | 45 |
| AW557873 | 15903 | Inhibitor of DNA binding 3 | Id3 | 45 |
| BG088107 | 50781 | Dickkopf homolog 3 | Dkk3 | 46 |
| BG062997 | 67080 | RIKEN cDNA 1700019D03 gene | 1700019D03Rik | 46 |
| BG076141 | 108699 | Chimerin (chimaerin) 1 | Chn1 | 46 |
| BG087940 | 223649 | Nuclear receptor binding protein 2 | Nrbp2 | 46 |
| BG079962 | 236539 | 3-Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase | Phgdh | 47 |
| BG075920 | 217480 | Diacylglycerol kinase, beta | Dgkb | 47 |
| BG069750 | 17769 | 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase | Mthfr | 47 |
| BG073197 | 195434 | UTP14, U3 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein, homolog B (yeast) | Utp14b | 47 |
| BG075567 | 259302 | SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 3 | Srgap3 | 48 |
| BG075594 | 384061 | Fibronectin type III domain containing 5 | Fndc5 | 48 |
| BG070737 | 20512 | Solute carrier family 1 (glial high-affinity glutamate transporter) | Slc1a3 | 48 |
| BG087565 | 54151 | Cysteine and histidine rich 1 | Cyhr1 | 48 |
| BG066372 | 17762 | Microtubule-associated protein tau | Mapt | 48 |
| BG088467 | 71833 | WD repeat domain 68 | Wdr68 | 48 |
| BG087239 | 226970 | Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) 4 | Arhgef4 | 49 |
| BG074754 | 14081 | Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 1 | Acsl1 | 49 |
| BG087975 | 14183 | Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 | Fgfr2 | 49 |
| BG081752 | 19791 | Rn18s ribosomal RNA | Rn18s | 49 |
| BG064101 | 14897 | Thyroid hormone receptor interactor 12 | Trip12 | 49 |
| BG072359 | 14085 | Fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase | Fah | 49 |
| BG065128 | 26399 | Mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 6 | Map2k6 | 49 |
| BG073314 | 16515 | Potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 12 | Kcnj12 | 49 |
| C87546 | 20869 | Serine/threonine kinase 11 | Stk11 | 49 |
Values indicated as percentage of control eye mean, the average of six biologically independent sample values from six separate, independent arrays.
Identification of Functional Gene Categories Significantly Regulated in Early ONH Injury
The most significantly upregulated gene categories by DAVID analysis in the Early Injury group are listed in Table 4. The cell cycle was the most significantly upregulated category and included approximately 14% of all upregulated genes. Among the most upregulated genes in this category were protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 (Prc1, 720%), pituitary tumor-transforming 1 (securin, Pttg, 622%), and budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 (Bub1, 559%), three genes with specific functions in chromosome separation during cytokinesis, suggesting completion of the cell cycle. Note that the most upregulated gene in Table 2 was topoisomerase 2a (Top2a, 1424%). Although not a component of the cell cycle GO category, this enzyme is essential for DNA replication and a component of the related category of cell proliferation. The second most upregulated GO category in Early Injury was the cytoskeleton. Several of the most upregulated genes in this category were kinesins with specific mitotic and spindle-associated functions (Kif18a, Kif22, Kif23, Nek2, Tpx2, and Nusap1; 970%–292%), also suggesting cell proliferation. The third category was immune process genes. Among the most affected of these genes were the cytokines chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (Cxcl1, 271%) and Lif (223%), both of which reached peak levels in the Early Injury group. The immune process category also included components of the complement cascade (C1qc, C1qa, Cfi, Cfh, and C1r) that were upregulated to between 215% and 150% of control values in Early Injury.
Table 4.
Upregulated Gene Ontology Categories in Early ONH Injury
| Significantly Upregulated Gene Categories | Genes (n) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Cell component or biological function* | ||
| Cell cycle | 82 | <0.00001 |
| Cytoskeleton | 77 | <0.00001 |
| Immune system process | 42 | <0.00005 |
| Cell motility | 25 | <0.005 |
| Extracellular matrix | 19 | <0.005 |
| Lysosome | 16 | <0.005 |
| Plasma membrane | 65 | <0.001 |
| Cell adhesion | 32 | <0.05 |
| Proteolysis | 35 | <0.05 |
| Cell differentiation | 80 | <0.05 |
| Blood vessel development | 16 | <0.05 |
| Generation of neurons | 19 | <0.05 |
| Phosphorylation | 42 | <0.05 |
To simplify the table, closely related subcategories are not listed. For example, cell cycle includes 23 significantly affected subcategories of the same genes, grouped by their relationship to different aspects of the cycle.
Table 5 summarizes the significant GO categories of the 271 genes downregulated in the Early Injury group. Most affected were GO categories related to glucose and lipid metabolism. However, the largest category was that for integral membrane proteins. Among the most downregulated genes with known functions in this class were the astrocyte glutamine and glutamate transporters Slc38a1 (38%) and Slc1a3 (48%) and the potassium channels Kcnd2 (42%) and Kcnj12 (50%).
Table 5.
Downregulated Gene Ontology Categories in Early ONH Injury
| Significantly Downregulated Gene Categories | Genes (n) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Cell component or biological function | ||
| Glucose metabolic process | 9 | <0.0005 |
| Peroxisome | 7 | <0.005 |
| Lipid metabolic process | 20 | <0.005 |
| Epithelial cell proliferation | 4 | <0.01 |
| Serine family amino acid biosynthetic process | 3 | <0.05 |
| Intrinsic membrane protein | 64 | <0.05 |
| Positive regulation of progression through cell cycle | 3 | <0.05 |
Inclusion of the few arrays available in the range of 2 to 4 did not have a substantial effect on the identification of genes significantly affected in the Early Injury Group. When we repeated our analysis excluding the data from these intermediate arrays, the probes identified as changed were 96% identical with those identified by the original analysis (Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental). With the exception of the addition of Bcas1 as among the most downregulated (41%), there was no change in the genes identified as most significantly affected (Tables 2, 3) or significant GO categories (Tables 4, 5).
Changes in Axonal mRNA Levels as Indicators of Early ONH Injury
In our previous array analysis of extensively injured ONH, we found significant downregulation of several retinal ganglion cell–specific messages that are present in optic nerve axons.27 In the present study, we examined two of these axonal messages, growth-associated protein 43 (Gap43) and neurofilament L (Nefl) by QPCR. Although both were significantly downregulated in the Advanced Injury group (to 26% ± 5% and 22% ± 5% of control values, respectively), only Gap43 was significantly reduced in Early Injury (65% ± 10%).
The brain-specific isoform of aldolase, Aldoc, was among the most downregulated genes in Early Injury by array analysis (Table 3). Aldoc is a component of axonal mRNA,38,39 but it is also expressed by astrocytes. By QPCR, Aldoc was confirmed to be significantly reduced in both Early (50% ± 9%) and Advanced (24% ± 4%) injury groups. In our arrays, the only distinctly axonal mRNA that was significantly downregulated in the Early Injury group was microtubule-associated protein tau (Mapt, 49%). Therefore, as expected based on the small amount of optic nerve degeneration in the Early Injury group, the axonal mRNA changes in Early Injury ONH were not dramatic.
Confirmation of Upregulation of Cell Proliferation Genes in Glaucoma Model ONH
Our microarray studies identified the cell cycle as the most upregulated biological process in Early Injury. To confirm these observations, we used QPCR to examine expression levels for several genes associated with cell proliferation (Fig. 4). During DNA replication and transcription, Top2a controls the topological states of DNA by transient breakage and subsequent rejoining of DNA strands. By QPCR, Early Injury group Top2a values were 610% ± 153% of control. Prc1 regulates the mitotic spindle midzone formation during cytokinesis. Extra spindle pole bodies homolog 1 (Espl1 or separase) acts together with Pttg1 (622% in Early Injury on arrays) to regulate chromatid separation at anaphase. By QPCR, Prc1 and Espl1 levels were found to be 838% ± 213% and 438% ± 120% of control values in the Early Injury group.
Figure 4.
Verification of upregulation of selected cell proliferation associated genes in Early and Advanced ONH Injury groups by QPCR. Top2a plays a role in DNA replication, whereas Prc1 and Espl1 function in cytokinesis. *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, and †P < 0.001 compared with the control group.
Increased DNA Content with Pressure-Induced ONH Injury
To confirm that cell cycle progression occurs early in ONH injury, total DNA content was measured in groups of glaucoma model ONH with optic nerve injury grades similar to those in the microarray and QPCR studies. ONH DNA content in the Early Injury group was increased to 117% (P < 0.05, one way t-test) compared with controls, whereas the DNA content was nearly doubled in ONH with Advanced Injury (Table 6).
Table 6.
Total ONH DNA Content
| Group | DNA Content (Percentage of Control Mean) | Grade | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 100 ± 8 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 10 |
| Early injury | 117 ± 6* | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 11 |
| Advanced injury | 184 ± 12† | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 13 |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.00001, one-tailed t-test.
Gene Expression Analysis of IL-6–type Cytokines and Janus Kinase-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription Signaling in Early ONH Injury
Our array analysis had demonstrated the upregulation of the cytokine Lif (223%) in Early Injury. Lif is known to promote glial cell proliferation and astrocytic differentiation.40–42 Lif signaling by way of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (Jak-Stat) pathway can lead to the upregulation of the feedback inhibitor suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3), which was increased to 373% in the Early Injury group (Table 2). Another gene highly upregulated in this group is Racgap1 (556%), a gene associated with cytokinesis. Interestingly, Racgap1 has recently been shown to be essential for the Jak phosphorylation of transcription factor, Stat3 protein, and its entry into the nucleus.43 Lif is a member of the IL-6–type cytokine family, all which share a common receptor component (IL-6 signal transducer, IL-6st, aka Gp130) to initiate signaling, primarily through Jak-Stat signaling pathways.44
Observation of Lif, Socs3, and Racgap1 among the most upregulated genes suggested Jak-Stat pathway activation in early ONH injury. Because members of this family play important roles in glial responses to injury, including glial progenitor cell proliferation and differentiation to astrocytes,42,45,46 we used QPCR to determine the responses of all IL-6–type cytokines in glaucoma model ONH, many of which were not on our arrays. These studies not only confirmed the upregulation of Lif, they also revealed a significant and dramatic upregulation of IL-6 (1553%), coupled with significant responses by cardiotrophin-like cytokine factor 1 (Clcf1, 325%) and downregulation of ciliary neurotrophic factor (Cntf, 40%) in the Early Injury group (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.
IL-6–type cytokine, Lifr, and Socs3 expression in glaucomatous ONH injury examined by QPCR. This demonstrates the dramatic upregulation of IL-6 in early ONH injury. In addition, it confirms the upregulation of Lif identified by array analysis and reveals significant regulation of 2 of 4 other members of this family that are expressed in the ONH, Clcf1 and Cntf. Lifr, the common receptor component for Lif, Clcf1, and Cntf were significantly downregulated in both injury groups. Upregulation of a target of Jak-Stat signaling, Socs3, in both injury groups was significant, confirming array results. Note that the scale of the y-axis is log2 and that Control group variation is indicated by thicker SEM bars. *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, †P < 0.001 compared with Controls.
Cellular receptor expression will determine the functional responses to IL-6 family cytokines. We used both our microarray data and QPCR to determine expression levels of the components of all the IL-6–type cytokine receptor components in glaucoma model ONH. By QPCR, we found that Lif receptor (Lifr) was downregulated to 35% ± 11% in Early Injury (Fig. 5), whereas the other IL-6 family receptor components (II6st and Cntfr, array data, II6ra by QPCR; Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental) were not significantly altered in expression in any experimental group. Lifr is the common receptor for Lif, Clcf1, Cntf, and two other cytokines that were unchanged in ONH mRNA expression, oncostatin M (Osm) and cardiotrophin 1 (Ctf 1; Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
Among the Jak-Stat pathway components on our arrays, we found moderate, but significant, upregulation of Jak2 (146%) and Stat3 (147%) in Early Injury, whereas Jak1, Stat1, and Stat2 levels were not significantly affected. We also used QPCR to confirm the upregulation of Socs3, finding an increase to 402% ± 96% in the Early Injury group (Fig. 5). Socs3 can inhibit signaling through other receptors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr).47 Socs4, another inhibitor of Egfr signaling, was significantly upregulated (175%) as well by array analysis. By QPCR, Egfr levels were unchanged by Early Injury (95% ± 17%), whereas epidermal growth factor levels fell significantly to 38% ± 7% (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
Cytokine Cxcl1 in Early Injury
Cytokine Cxcl, also highly expressed in the Early Injury group (273%), is expressed by injured astrocytes,48 microglia, and oligodendroglial precursors,49 is a mitogen for both endothelial cells and oligodendroglia,49,50 and may recruit progenitor cells to areas of injury.51
Other Growth Factors in Early Injury
A number of growth factors have been suggested to play important roles in ONH responses to IOP-induced injury. Transforming growth factor β2 (Tgfb2) is upregulated in the aqueous humor in glaucoma, exerts significant effects in the anterior segment, and may play a role in ONH ECM remodeling in glaucoma.52–54 However, our studies show that Tgfb2 is downregulated in Early Injury ONH (34%, Table 3; QPCR, Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental), confirming our earlier observation.27 In contrast, our QPCR analyses demonstrated that Early Injury had no significant effect on mRNA levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin 4/5, nerve growth factor, neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor Trkb, or p75 neurotrophin receptor (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
ECM Gene Expression Changes in Glaucoma Model ONH Injury
Human glaucomatous optic neuropathy involves extensive remodeling of the ECM of the lamina cribrosa, the network of connective, glial, and vascular tissue that spans the scleral opening and supports optic nerve axons as they exit the globe.55,56 Our previous studies demonstrate that changes in ECM gene expression and protein deposition also occur early during IOP-induced injury in rat glaucoma model ONH,24,25,27 an observation further supported by the DAVID analysis used in this study (Table 4). By QPCR, we confirmed increased expression levels of four of these ECM genes: Postn, Tnc, Fbln2, and matrix gla protein (Mgp; Fig. 6). All four are matricellular proteins, proteins that modulate cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions and are implicated in processes such as cell proliferation and migration.57 Other matricellular proteins significantly affected in early injury were secreted phosphoprotein 1(osteopontin, Spp1 204%) and SPARC-like 1 (hevin, Sparcl1 (33%). Spp1 upregulation is associated with microglial activation and stimulates astrocyte migration.58 Sparcl1 has antiadhesion, antiproliferation properties and is present in differentiated astrocytes and endothelial venules.59–61
Figure 6.
Pressure-induced changes in ONH ECM gene expression verified and determined by QPCR. Although changes began in early injury, upregulated gene expression of four matricellular ECM proteins (Postn, Tnc, Fbln2, and Mgp) became significant in the Advanced Injury group. In contrast, the integrin component Itgav was downregulated in the Early Injury group. Timp1, the ECM metalloproteinase inhibitor, was significantly upregulated in both injury groups. Note that the scale of the y-axis is log2 and that the variation of the Control group is indicated by thicker SEM bars. *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, and †P < 0.001 compared with Control group. For Postn, Fbln2, and Mgp, differences between Early and Advanced injury group values are also significant (P < 0.01).
Increased collagen expression, a characteristic of human and experimental glaucomatous ONH remodeling,24,62–64 was indicated in our array study by modest upregulation of collagens Col4a1 (231%), Col6a2 (169%), and Col5a2 (168%) in the Early Injury group.
Integrins are important mediators of cell ECM adhesion.56 Among integrin probes on our arrays (α1, α3, α5, αV, and α9; β1, β3, β4, β5, and β7), only integrins β1 (Itgb1) and αV (Itgav) were significantly altered by Early Injury to 197% and 64% of controls, respectively. Intgb1 is a common receptor component for many ECM proteins, whereas Itgav receptors are somewhat more selective, linking the cellular cytoskeleton to fibronectin, laminins, tenascins, Spp1, vitronectin, L1 cell adhesion molecule, Postn, and various RGD-containing proteins.65 In neural tissues, Itgav is expressed by glia and is often involved in the mediation of vascular interactions.66 QPCR confirmed Itgav downregulation in the Early Injury group (Fig. 6).
In an earlier study of retinal gene expression changes in our glaucoma model,67 Timp1 was the most upregulated gene. Because probes for this protease inhibitor were not present on the arrays used in the present study, we determined its expression by QPCR, finding it significantly upregulated in the Early (437%) and Advanced ONH Injury group (Fig. 6).
Astrocyte-Specific Marker Expression in Early IOP-Induced ONH Injury
As in our previous report,27 QPCR demonstrated that the expression of the common marker for activated astrocytes, Gfap, was not increased in glaucoma model ONH (Fig. 7). Additionally, levels of five other astrocyte-associated messages associated with mature ONH astrocytes were evaluated and found to be either decreased or not significantly changed by QPCR: Aqp4, Gja1, multiple EGF-like-domains 10 (Megf10), and paired box 2 (Pax2). Aqp4 is a water channel associated with astrocytic endfeet and the blood brain/cerebral spinal fluid barrier.68,69 Gja1 is a key component of astrocytic gap junctions.70 Megf10 is associated with astrocytic phagocytosis.40 The transcription factor Pax2 is specifically expressed by optic nerve astrocytes71–73 and associated with proliferative capacity.71,74,75 Nestin (Nes) and vimentin (Vim) are expressed in immature or proliferating astrocytes.76 Vim levels were increased only in the Advanced Injury group (145% ± 8%). Additionally, microarray analysis showed that expression of the glial glutamate transporter Slc1a3 was significantly reduced in both injury groups (Table 3). Finally, S100b, a macroglial marker, was significantly downregulated in both injury groups (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
Figure 7.
Pressure-induced changes in astrocyte-associated ONH messages determined by QPCR. Levels of four messages associated with mature astrocytes (Gfap, Aqp4, Gja1, and Megf10) either were unchanged or were significantly downregulated. Also significantly downregulated was transcription factor Pax2, associated with astrocytic proliferative capacity. Nes and Vim are intermediate proteins expressed in immature astrocytes. Moderate Vim upregulation was found in the Advanced Injury group. *P < 0.05, ‡P < 0.01, †P < 0.001.
Microglial-Specific Marker Expression in Early IOP-Induced ONH Injury
Expression levels of some microglial activation markers not present on our arrays were determined by QPCR (Fig. 8). Allograft inflammatory factor (Aif1, or IBA1), a calcium channel associated with microglial hypertrophy and proliferation, was significantly upregulated, but only in the Advanced Injury group (298% ± 45%). Elevation of Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (Csf1r), which plays a key role in microglial activation, in the Advanced Injury group did not reach statistical significance. Purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2ry12) is an adenine nucleotide receptor abundant in microglia in the brain,77 although it is also present in endothelial cells.78 P2ry12 downregulation is associated with microglial activation and process retraction79 and was significant in the Early ONH injury group (Fig. 8).
Figure 8.
Microglial marker message levels determined by QPCR. Upregulation of calcium channel Aif1 and growth factor receptor Csf1r and downregulation of purine receptor P2ry12 are all associated with microglial activation. Of these messages, only the downregulation of P2ry12 was significant in the Early Injury group, whereas Aif1 levels reached significance only in the Advanced Injury group. *P < 0.05; ‡P < 0.01.
Other messages present on our arrays that are enriched in microglia include cd34 antigen,80 ferritin light chain (Ftl1), translocator protein (peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, Tspo), TGFβ1 receptor 1 (Tgfb1r1), and milk fat globule EGF factor 8 protein (Mfge8). Of these, only Cd34 was significantly upregulated in the Early Injury group (Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
Oligodendroglia-Specific Marker Expression in Early IOP-Induced ONH Injury
In this study, though we limited our analysis to the initial 0.4-mm portion of the optic nerve, some axons in the distal portion of this segment were partially myelinated; therefore, our analysis includes a population of oligodendroglia. By QPCR, we found that chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (Cspg4, or NG2), an oligodendroglial precursor marker,81 was not significantly altered in expression in glaucoma model ONH (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental). By array analysis, platelet-derived growth factor α (Pdgfa) was unchanged, and myelin basic protein (Mbp) was significantly increased only in the Advanced Injury group (150%, Supplementary Table S4, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
Vascular-Specific Marker Expression in Early IOP-Induced ONH Injury
In addition to neural tissues, vascular components of the ONH are likely to play critical roles in the tissue response to elevated IOP, as confirmed by our DAVID analysis of upregulated gene categories (Table 4). The upregulated genes specifically associated by array analysis with the vasculature in the early ONH injury group most frequently were Adamts1 (593%), tweak receptor (Tnfrsf12a, 329%), non-muscle myosin Myh9 (244%), and the Vegfb binding protein neuropilin1 (Nrp1, 171%). In addition, among significantly downregulated genes were the endothelin b receptor (Ednrb, 55%) and vascular-associated Itgav (Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental).
To better evaluate the potential contribution of vascular cells to the dramatic gene expression in early pressure-induced ONH injury, we examined some vascular-associated messages by QPCR (Fig. 9). Endothelin 1 (Edn1) and adrenomedullin (Adm) are potent vasoconstrictor and vasodilator proteins, respectively. Heavy chain myosin 11 (Myh11) is a marker for vascular smooth muscle. Vegfa and Vegfb regulate angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier permeability. The transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor 1α (Hif1a) as well as erythropoietin (Epo) and heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1) are frequently upregulated under hypoxic conditions (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5317/-/DCSupplemental). Of these, the only significant change in the Early Injury group was a downregulation of Vegfb to 61% ± 5%.
Figure 9.
Vascular-associated message levels determined by QPCR. Message levels for the vasoactive compounds, End1 and Adm, were not significantly altered, Vegf isoforms were not upregulated, and message levels of Hif1a remained unchanged. The smooth muscle myosin Myh11 was significantly downregulated in the Advanced Injury group. *P < 0.05.
ONH Gene Expression Change with Physiological IOP Elevation
The physiological IOP elevation associated with the dark phase of the light cycle resulted in moderate, but significant, expression changes in many ONH genes. DAVID analysis indicated that upregulated genes primarily affected signal transduction and the cytoskeleton, whereas downregulated genes were primarily associated with ribosomal protein synthesis. Of the genes significantly regulated by physiological IOP elevation, 170 genes were significantly regulated in the same direction as in the Early Injury group. The magnitude of change was generally greater in Early Injury. For example, of the genes listed in Table 2, only five genes (Fosl2, Trib1, Ddah1, Tubb2b, and Tpm4) were also upregulated by physiological IOP elevation. For these five, the magnitude was <50% of the level reached in the Early Injury group. Similarly, for the genes downregulated by Early Injury listed in Table 3, Physiological IOP elevation downregulated only D4Ertd103e and Ctnnd1 by >50%.
Discussion
Microarray analysis of gene expression is a powerful tool for evaluating tissue responses to injury, such as elevated IOP in the eye. However, the contribution of array analysis to the understanding of disease processes may be limited by a number of factors, including the quality and relevance of the samples analyzed, the adequacy of the study design, the array platform and the probe spectrum it contains, the quality of the technical procedure, and the statistical analysis. Additionally, key messages or pathway components may not be present at a level of abundance that allows their detection, or, perhaps more important, pathways may be regulated at the protein level rather than the gene expression level. With these caveats, the microarray analysis and supportive studies reported here lead to the following observations about the earliest ONH responses to elevated IOP exposure.
The ONH Genomic Response to Minimal Pressure-Induced Injury Is Dominated by the Upregulation of Cell Proliferation Genes
Minimal exposure to elevated IOP (cumulative exposure of <100 mm Hg above controls over a 2-week period) results in the significant regulation of a large number of ONH genes. These Early Injury genes are dominated by the increased expression of genes associated with all phases of the cell cycle, indicating that cell cycle progression and mitosis are early and significant events in ONH injury. This study also shows that for most of these cell cycle genes, peak ONH levels are reached when optic nerve axon degeneration is <15%. Our findings of increased DNA content in these minimally injured ONH support these observations. These studies also confirm similar observations made in our earlier study of longer (1-mm) segments of glaucoma model ONH from eyes with extensive optic nerve axon degeneration.27
Altered IL-6–type Cytokine Signaling Is Implicated in the ONH Response to Early Elevated IOP-Induced Injury
This study demonstrates significant upregulation of three IL-6–type cytokines (IL-6, Lif, and Clcf1) and implicates altered Jak-Stat pathway signaling, as evidenced by Socs3 upregulation, as early ONH responses to elevated IOP exposure. IL-6 and Lif can be produced by all the major cellular components of the ONH (Lambert WS, et al. IOVS 2009;50:E-Abstract 2792),41,42,82–87 and both can exert axonal neuroprotective, regenerative,88–92 and proliferative responses.45,93 All three cytokines can induce astrocytic differentiation from precursor cells.42,94–96 Lif may also promote microglial proliferation.97 In addition, these cytokines may act on ONH vascular components because IL-6 can stimulate smooth muscle cell proliferation,98 although Lif has been shown to inhibit retinal endothelial cell proliferation.99 Although less is known about Clcf1, this cytokine does have both growth factor100 and neuroprotective properties,101 and its expression is associated with response to stress.102 In contrast to the other three, Cntf was significantly downregulated in Early Injury, as has been observed after nerve crush.103 ONH astrocytes express Cntf and its tripartite receptor components,104 and, in retina, Cntf represses glial proliferation.105 Therefore, the downregulation of Cntf may complement the proliferation-promoting actions of the upregulated cytokines in this family. Together, these observations suggest that altered expression of these cytokines may contribute to proliferative responses in the ONH to elevated IOP exposure.
In Early Injury ONH, expression levels for the receptor components of the IL-6-family cytokines were unchanged, except for the downregulation of Lifr, the common receptor component for Lif, Clcf1, and Cntf. Lifr is expressed by most ONH cellular components106–112,113 and is important for astrocyte precursor differentiation, including Jak-Stat pathway-regulated Gfap expression.114–117 Therefore, the downregulation of this receptor is consistent with the lack of increased Gfap expression. In addition, in the retina, Lifr plays an essential role in endogenous neuroprotective mechanisms triggered by preconditioning-induced stress,118 suggesting that Lifr downregulation in the ONH may decrease the effectiveness of potential protective signaling by this receptor.
These observations suggest the involvement of IL-6–type cytokines in early ONH injury; however, we fully realize that the cell-specific locations and impact on ONH integrity of potential activated receptor pathway signaling remains to be determined.
Upregulation of GFAP or Other Astrocyte-Specific Genes Is Not a Characteristic of Early ONH Responses to Elevated IOP Exposure
Upregulation of Gfap is such a common marker for astrocytes responding to, or “activated” by, neural injury that the increased expression of this intermediate filament protein is often considered necessary and sufficient evidence of an astrocytic reaction. In glaucoma model retinas and the RGC layer, Gfap upregulation is readily observed.67,119–121 However, in the ONH, early injury from elevated IOP exposure is not associated with the significant upregulation of Gfap or any other astrocyte-specific gene we examined. Rather, a number of unique astrocytic genes were significantly downregulated. This finding is consistent with the expected downregulation of differentiated cellular functions that would be anticipated if astrocytic mitosis were a major component of the proliferative responses observed in these minimally injured ONH. This finding also suggests an initial passive, rather than active, contribution of astrocytes to further nerve injury because a reduction in differentiated astrocytic functions is likely to include compromised astrocyte-mediated metabolic and functional support for axons. In the ONH, where the metabolic demands of unmyelinated axons are much greater than those of the myelinated nerve122 and individual astrocytes are in functional contact with many axons,123–125 such a compromise is likely to contribute significantly to further axonal vulnerability to elevated IOP.
Activation and Potential Proliferation of Other Glia Cell Types
In early injury, a purine receptor abundant in brain microglia,77 P2ry12, was significantly downregulated, a characteristic of microglial activation.79,126,127 Additionally, our array data showed that Nrp1 was significantly upregulated by early injury, and Nrp1 upregulation has been localized to activated microglia.128 Further evidence of microglial activation became apparent in eyes with more advanced injury as Aif1 expression was significantly increased. However, additional studies are needed to determine specifically whether both microglial proliferation and activation occur early in the time course of pressure-induced ONH injury.
Early Injury and Vasculature-Associated Genes
Our array GO analysis and our QPCR studies indicate that early pressure-induced ONH injury is associated with altered expression of some genes associated with the vascular component of the ONH. Similar Myh9 and Myh11 responses are observed in carotid artery injury,129 and Tnfrsf12a upregulation is associated with endothelial cell proliferation and migration. Nrp1 is localized to the perivascular region of injured neural tissues,130 in proximity to its binding partner, Vegfb, which was downregulated in the ONH in early injury. Although the specific functions of Vegfb protein are not well understood, it is abundant in brain and retina and is thought to play a critical role in the survival, rather than growth, of vascular cells.131–133
ECM Matricellular Protein Gene Expression
Expression levels of a number of ECM matricellular proteins were significantly altered in early ONH injury. The upregulation of one of these messages, Postn, begins in early injury and is one of the most dramatically upregulated genes in advanced injury. In our study of extensively injured ONH, Postn was the most upregulated gene.27 Postn is expressed in cells subjected to mechanical stress, particularly vascular smooth muscle cells.134 Postn and the other affected matricellular genes are expressed by astrocytes39,59,135,136 and are altered in expression during injury-induced vascular remodeling and repair.137–142 These observations suggest that modification of astrocyte-ECM, and possibly vascular cell-ECM, interactions begins early in pressure-induced ONH injury, implying that the interface between astrocyte processes and the vasculature may be particularly vulnerable.
Further Directions
Currently, we are using immunohistochemistry to identify proliferating ONH cells and those that express the IL-6–type cytokines as well as the protein products of other affected genes identified in this study. In addition, we are in the process of developing a model of glaucomatous ONH injury in which the level and duration of elevated IOP exposure can be precisely controlled. Such a model will allow us to determine the exact onset and time course of these ONH gene expression responses, with the goal of understanding their relationship to the development of glaucomatous axon loss.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY016866 and EY010145 and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Disclosure: E.C. Johnson, None; T.A. Doser, None; W.O. Cepurna, None; J.A. Dyck, None; L. Jia, None; Y. Guo, None; W.S. Lambert, None; J.C. Morrison, None
References
- 1. Howell GR, Libby RT, Marchant JK, et al. Absence of glaucoma in DBA/2J mice homozygous for wild-type versions of Gpnmb and Tyrp1. BMC Genet. 2007;8:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, II: the site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:635–649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Burgoyne CF, Quigley HA, Thompson HW, Vitale S, Varma R. Early changes in optic disc compliance and surface position in experimental glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1800–1809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bellezza AJ, Rintalan CJ, Thompson HW, Downs JC, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. Deformation of the lamina cribrosa and anterior scleral canal wall in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:623–637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Downs JC, Ensor ME, Bellezza AJ, Thompson HW, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. Posterior scleral thickness in perfusion-fixed normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3202–3208 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yang H, Downs JC, Bellezza A, Thompson H, Burgoyne CF. 3-D histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: prelaminar neural tissues and cupping. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5068–5084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yang H, Downs JC, Girkin C, et al. 3-D histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: lamina cribrosa and peripapillary scleral position and thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4597–4607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Downs JC, Yang H, Girkin C, et al. Three-dimensional histomorphometry of the normal and early glaucomatous monkey optic nerve head: neural canal and subarachnoid space architecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3195–3208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Downs JC, Suh JK, Thomas KA, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT, Burgoyne CF. Viscoelastic material properties of the peripapillary sclera in normal and early-glaucoma monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:540–546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Hart RT. Three-dimensional reconstruction of normal and early glaucoma monkey optic nerve head connective tissues. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4388–4399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Yang H, Downs JC, Burgoyne CF. Physiologic intereye differences in monkey optic nerve head architecture and their relation to changes in early experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:224–234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Balaratnasingam C, Morgan WH, Bass L, Cringle SJ, Yu DY. Time-dependent effects of elevated intraocular pressure on optic nerve head axonal transport and cytoskeleton proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:986–999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Balaratnasingam C, Morgan WH, Bass L, Matich G, Cringle SJ, Yu DY. Axonal transport and cytoskeletal changes in the laminar regions after elevated intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3632–3644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Balaratnasingam C, Morgan WH, Bass L, et al. Elevated pressure induced astrocyte damage in the optic nerve. Brain Res. 2008;1244:142–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pease ME, McKinnon SJ, Quigley HA, Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Zack DJ. Obstructed axonal transport of BDNF and its receptor TrkB in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:764–774 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Anderson DR, Hendrickson A. Effect of intraocular pressure on rapid axoplasmic transport in monkey optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol. 1974;13:771–783 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ou B, Ohno S, Tsukahara S. Ultrastructural changes and immunocytochemical localization of microtubule-associated protein 1 in guinea pig optic nerves after acute increase in intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:963–971 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Morrison JC, Cepurna WO, Johnson EC. Modeling glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1999;39:29–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Levkovitch-Verbin H. Animal models of optic nerve diseases. Eye. 2004;18:1066–1074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rasmussen CA, Kaufman PL. Primate glaucoma models. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:311–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Weinreb RN, Lindsey JD. The importance of models in glaucoma research. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:302–304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pang IH, Clark AF. Rodent models for glaucoma retinopathy and optic neuropathy. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:483–505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. McKinnon SJ, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. Mouse models of retinal ganglion cell death and glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:816–824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Johnson EC, Morrison JC, Farrell S, Deppmeier L, Moore CG, McGinty MR. The effect of chronically elevated intraocular pressure on the rat optic nerve head extracellular matrix. Exp Eye Res. 1996;62:663–674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Johnson EC, Deppmeier LM, Wentzien SK, Hsu I, Morrison JC. Chronology of optic nerve head and retinal responses to elevated intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:431–442 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Martin KR, Quigley HA, Valenta D, Kielczewski J, Pease ME. Optic nerve dynein motor protein distribution changes with intraocular pressure elevation in a rat model of glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:255–262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Johnson EC, Jia L, Cepurna WO, Doser TA, Morrison JC. Global changes in optic nerve head gene expression after exposure to elevated intraocular pressure in a rat glaucoma model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3161–3177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Morrison JC, Moore CG, Deppmeier LM, Gold BG, Meshul CK, Johnson EC. A rat model of chronic pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Exp Eye Res. 1997;64:85–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jia L, Cepurna WO, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Patterns of intraocular pressure elevation after aqueous humor outflow obstruction in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1380–1385 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Cepurna W, Jia L. Understanding mechanisms of pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:217–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jia L, Cepurna WO, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Effect of general anesthetics on IOP in rats with experimental aqueous outflow obstruction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3415–3419 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Morrison JC, Jia L, Cepurna W, Guo Y, Johnson E. Reliability and sensitivity of the TonoLab rebound tonometer in awake Brown Norway rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2802–2808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Evertsz EM, Au-Young J, Ruvolo MV, Lim AC, Reynolds MA. Hybridization cross-reactivity within homologous gene families on glass cDNA microarrays. BioTechniques. 2001;31:1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Oshlack A, Chabot AE, Smyth GK, Gilad Y. Using DNA microarrays to study gene expression in closely related species. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1235–1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Pang IH, Wang WH, Clark AF. Acute effects of glaucoma medications on rat intraocular pressure. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:207–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Cepurna WO, Kayton RJ, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Age related optic nerve axonal loss in adult Brown Norway rats. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:877–884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Willis D, Li KW, Zheng JQ, et al. Differential transport and local translation of cytoskeletal, injury-response, and neurodegeneration protein mRNAs in axons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:778–791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cahoy JD, Emery B, Kaushal A, et al. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J Neurosci. 2008;28:264–278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bauer S, Patterson PH. Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes neural stem cell self-renewal in the adult brain. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12089–12099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Nakanishi M, Niidome T, Matsuda S, Akaike A, Kihara T, Sugimoto H. Microglia-derived interleukin-6 and leukaemia inhibitory factor promote astrocytic differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:649–658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mi H, Haeberle H, Barres BA. Induction of astrocyte differentiation by endothelial cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1538–1547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kawashima T, Bao YC, Minoshima Y, et al. A Rac GTPase-activating protein, MgcRacGAP, is a nuclear localizing signal-containing nuclear chaperone in the activation of STAT transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:1796–1813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Heinrich PC, Behrmann I, Haan S, Hermanns HM, Muller-Newen G, Schaper F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem J. 2003;374:1–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bauer S. Cytokine control of adult neural stem cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1153:48–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Bauer S, Kerr BJ, Patterson PH. The neuropoietic cytokine family in development, plasticity, disease and injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:221–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Xia L, Wang L, Chung AS, et al. Identification of both positive and negative domains within the epidermal growth factor receptor COOH-terminal region for signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) activation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:30716–30723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Katayama T, Tanaka H, Yoshida T, Uehara T, Minami M. Neuronal injury induces cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1) production in astrocytes. J Pharmacol Sci. 2009;109:88–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Filipovic R, Zecevic N. The effect of CXCL1 on human fetal oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Glia. 2008;56:1–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Fujisawa N, Hayashi S, Kurdowska A, Carr FK, Miller EJ. Inhibition of GROalpha-induced human endothelial cell proliferation by the alpha-chemokine inhibitor antileukinate. Cytokine. 1999;11:231–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gordon RJ, McGregor AL, Connor B. Chemokines direct neural progenitor cell migration following striatal cell loss. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009;41:219–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tamm ER, Fuchshofer R. What increases outflow resistance in primary open-angle glaucoma? Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(suppl 2):S101–S104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fuchshofer R, Birke M, Welge-Lussen U, Kook D, Lutjen-Drecoll E. Transforming growth factor-beta 2 modulated extracellular matrix component expression in cultured human optic nerve head astrocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:568–578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Fukuchi T, Ueda J, Hanyu T, Abe H, Sawaguchi S. Distribution and expression of transforming growth factor-beta and platelet-derived growth factor in the normal and glaucomatous monkey optic nerve heads. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45:592–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hernandez MR. The optic nerve head in glaucoma: role of astrocytes in tissue remodeling. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:297–321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Morrison JC. Integrins in the optic nerve head: potential roles in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:453–477 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Bornstein P. Matricellular proteins: an overview. J Cell Commun Signal. 2009;3:163–165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ellison JA, Barone FC, Feuerstein GZ. Matrix remodeling after stroke: de novo expression of matrix proteins and integrin receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;890:204–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wilczynska KM, Singh SK, Adams B, et al. Nuclear factor I isoforms regulate gene expression during the differentiation of human neural progenitors to astrocytes. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1173–1181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Chittka A, Arevalo JC, Rodriguez-Guzman M, Perez P, Chao MV, Sendtner M. The p75NTR-interacting protein SC1 inhibits cell cycle progression by transcriptional repression of cyclin E. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:985–996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Girard JP, Springer TA. Cloning from purified high endothelial venule cells of hevin, a close relative of the antiadhesive extracellular matrix protein SPARC. Immunity. 1995;2:113–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hernandez MR, Ye H, Roy S. Collagen type IV gene expression in human optic nerve heads with primary open angle glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:41–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Morrison JC, Dorman-Pease ME, Dunkelberger GR, Quigley HA. Optic nerve head extracellular matrix in primary optic atrophy and experimental glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1020–1024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hernandez MR, Andrzejewska WM, Neufeld AH. Changes in the extracellular matrix of the human optic nerve head in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109:180–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Gillan L, Matei D, Fishman DA, Gerbin CS, Karlan BY, Chang DD. Periostin secreted by epithelial ovarian carcinoma is a ligand for alpha(V)beta(3) and alpha(V)beta(5) integrins and promotes cell motility. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5358–5364 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. McCarty JH, Lacy-Hulbert A, Charest A, et al. Selective ablation of alphav integrins in the central nervous system leads to cerebral hemorrhage, seizures, axonal degeneration and premature death. Development. 2005;132:165–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ahmed F, Brown KM, Stephan DA, Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Tomarev SI. Microarray analysis of changes in mRNA levels in the rat retina after experimental elevation of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1247–1258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Inoue M, Wakayama Y, Liu JW, Murahashi M, Shibuya S, Oniki H. Ultrastructural localization of aquaporin 4 and alpha1-syntrophin in the vascular feet of brain astrocytes. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2002;197:87–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Verkman AS, Binder DK, Bloch O, Auguste K, Papadopoulos MC. Three distinct roles of aquaporin-4 in brain function revealed by knockout mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758:1085–1093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Brand-Schieber E, Werner P, Iacobas DA, et al. Connexin43, the major gap junction protein of astrocytes, is down-regulated in inflamed white matter in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurosci Res. 2005;80:798–808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Mi H, Barres BA. Purification and characterization of astrocyte precursor cells in the developing rat optic nerve. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1049–1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Chan-Ling T, Chu Y, Baxter L, Weible Ii M, Hughes S. In vivo characterization of astrocyte precursor cells (APCs) and astrocytes in developing rat retinae: differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. Glia. 2009;57:39–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Soukkarieh C, Agius E, Soula C, Cochard P. Pax2 regulates neuronal-glial cell fate choice in the embryonic optic nerve. Dev Biol. 2007;303:800–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Dahl E, Koseki H, Balling R. Pax genes and organogenesis. Bioessays. 1997;19:755–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Mansour H, Chamberlain CG, Weible MW, 2nd, Hughes S, Chu Y, Chan-Ling T. Aging-related changes in astrocytes in the rat retina: imbalance between cell proliferation and cell death reduces astrocyte availability. Aging Cell. 2008;7:526–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wiese C, Rolletschek A, Kania G, et al. Nestin expression—a property of multi-lineage progenitor cells? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:2510–2522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Sasaki Y, Hoshi M, Akazawa C, et al. Selective expression of Gi/o-coupled ATP receptor P2Y12 in microglia in rat brain. Glia. 2003;44:242–250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Simon J, Filippov AK, Goransson S, et al. Characterization and channel coupling of the P2Y(12) nucleotide receptor of brain capillary endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:31390–31400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Haynes SE, Hollopeter G, Yang G, et al. The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1512–1519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Ladeby R, Wirenfeldt M, Dalmau I, et al. Proliferating resident microglia express the stem cell antigen CD34 in response to acute neural injury. Glia. 2005;50:121–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Nishiyama A, Komitova M, Suzuki R, Zhu X. Polydendrocytes (NG2 cells): multifunctional cells with lineage plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:9–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Marz P, Cheng JG, Gadient RA, et al. Sympathetic neurons can produce and respond to interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3251–3256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Sallmann S, Juttler E, Prinz S, et al. Induction of interleukin-6 by depolarization of neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:8637–8642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Cheng JG, Patterson PH. LIF is an autocrine factor for sympathetic neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1997;9:372–380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Chung IY, Norris JG, Benveniste EN. Differential tumor necrosis factor alpha expression by astrocytes from experimental allergic encephalomyelitis-susceptible and -resistant rat strains. J Exp Med. 1991;173:801–811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Aloisi F, Rosa S, Testa U, et al. Regulation of leukemia inhibitory factor synthesis in cultured human astrocytes. J Immunol. 1994;152:5022–5031 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Weglarz L, Dzierzewicz Z, Skop B, et al. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans lipopolysaccharides induce endothelial cell IL-6 and IL-8 secretion and E-selectin and VCAM-1 expression. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2003;8:991–1003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Cafferty WB, Gardiner NJ, Das P, Qiu J, McMahon SB, Thompson SW. Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration fails in interleukin-6 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4432–4443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Cafferty WB, Gardiner NJ, Gavazzi I, et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor determines the growth status of injured adult sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 2001;21:7161–7170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Cao Z, Gao Y, Bryson JB, et al. The cytokine interleukin-6 is sufficient but not necessary to mimic the peripheral conditioning lesion effect on axonal growth. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5565–5573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Leibinger M, Muller A, Andreadaki A, Hauk TG, Kirsch M, Fischer D. Neuroprotective and axon growth-promoting effects following inflammatory stimulation on mature retinal ganglion cells in mice depend on ciliary neurotrophic factor and leukemia inhibitory factor. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14334–14341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Suzuki S, Tanaka K, Suzuki N. Ambivalent aspects of interleukin-6 in cerebral ischemia: inflammatory versus neurotrophic aspects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009;29:464–479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Kang MK, Kang SK. Interleukin-6 induces proliferation in adult spinal cord-derived neural progenitors via the JAK2/STAT3 pathway with EGF-induced MAPK phosphorylation. Cell Prolif. 2008;41:377–392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Taga T, Fukuda S. Role of IL-6 in the neural stem cell differentiation. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2005;28:249–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Uemura A, Takizawa T, Ochiai W, Yanagisawa M, Nakashima K, Taga T. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine induces astrocyte differentiation of fetal neuroepithelial cells via activation of STAT3. Cytokine. 2002;18:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Klein MA, Moller JC, Jones LL, Bluethmann H, Kreutzberg GW, Raivich G. Impaired neuroglial activation in interleukin-6 deficient mice. Glia. 1997;19:227–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Kerr BJ, Patterson PH. Potent pro-inflammatory actions of leukemia inhibitory factor in the spinal cord of the adult mouse. Exp Neurol. 2004;188:391–407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Nabata T, Morimoto S, Koh E, Shiraishi T, Ogihara T. Interleukin-6 stimulates c-myc expression and proliferation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Int. 1990;20:445–453 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. McColm JR, Geisen P, Peterson LJ, Hartnett ME. Exogenous leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) attenuates retinal vascularization reducing cell proliferation not apoptosis. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83:438–446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Forger NG, Prevette D, deLapeyriere O, et al. Cardiotrophin-like cytokine/cytokine-like factor 1 is an essential trophic factor for lumbar and facial motoneurons in vivo. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8854–8858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Schuettauf F, Zurakowski D, Quinto K, et al. Neuroprotective effects of cardiotrophin-like cytokine on retinal ganglion cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:1036–1042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Auernhammer CJ, Isele NB, Kopp FB, et al. Novel neurotrophin-1/B cell-stimulating factor-3 (cardiotrophin-like cytokine) stimulates corticotroph function via a signal transducer and activator of transcription-dependent mechanism negatively regulated by suppressor of cytokine signaling-3. Endocrinology. 2003;144:1202–1210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Kirsch M, Schneider T, Lee MY, Hofmann HD. Lesion-induced changes in the expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptor in rat optic nerve. Glia. 1998;23:239–248 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Liu X, Clark AF, Wordinger RJ. Expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and its tripartite receptor complex by cells of the human optic nerve head. Mol Vis. 2007;13:758–763 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Fischer AJ, Schmidt M, Omar G, Reh TA. BMP4 and CNTF are neuroprotective and suppress damage-induced proliferation of Muller glia in the retina. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27:531–542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Kubota Y, Hirashima M, Kishi K, Stewart CL, Suda T. Leukemia inhibitory factor regulates microvessel density by modulating oxygen-dependent VEGF expression in mice. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2393–2403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Sarup V, Patil K, Sharma SC. Ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptors are differentially expressed in the optic nerve transected adult rat retina. Brain Res. 2004;1013:152–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Ng YP, He W, Ip NY. Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor signaling negatively modulates nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells and sympathetic neurons. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:38731–38739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Scott RL, Gurusinghe AD, Rudvosky AA, et al. Expression of leukemia inhibitory factor receptor mRNA in sensory dorsal root ganglion and spinal motor neurons of the neonatal rat. Neurosci Lett. 2000;295:49–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Morikawa Y, Tohya K, Tamura S, Ichihara M, Miyajima A, Senba E. Expression of interleukin-6 receptor, leukemia inhibitory factor receptor and glycoprotein 130 in the murine cerebellum and neuropathological effect of leukemia inhibitory factor on cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuroscience. 2000;100:841–848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Yamakuni H, Minami M, Satoh M. Localization of mRNA for leukemia inhibitory factor receptor in the adult rat brain. J Neuroimmunol. 1996;70:45–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Ruprecht K, Kuhlmann T, Seif F, et al. Effects of oncostatin M on human cerebral endothelial cells and expression in inflammatory brain lesions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001;60:1087–1098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Taylor AM, Berchtold NC, Perreau VM, Tu CH, Li Jeon N, Cotman CW. Axonal mRNA in uninjured and regenerating cortical mammalian axons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:4697–4707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Richards LJ, Kilpatrick TJ, Dutton R, et al. Leukaemia inhibitory factor or related factors promote the differentiation of neuronal and astrocytic precursors within the developing murine spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:291–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Pitman M, Emery B, Binder M, Wang S, Butzkueven H, Kilpatrick TJ. LIF receptor signaling modulates neural stem cell renewal. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27:255–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Lee HK, Seo IA, Suh DJ, Hong JI, Yoo YH, Park HT. Interleukin-6 is required for the early induction of glial fibrillary acidic protein in Schwann cells during Wallerian degeneration. J Neurochem. 2009;108:776–786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Bartlett PF, Brooker GJ, Faux CH, et al. Regulation of neural stem cell differentiation in the forebrain. Immunol Cell Biol. 1998;76:414–418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Chollangi S, Wang J, Martin A, Quinn J, Ash JD. Preconditioning-induced protection from oxidative injury is mediated by leukemia inhibitory factor receptor (LIFR) and its ligands in the retina. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;34:535–544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Wang X, Tay SS, Ng YK. An immunohistochemical study of neuronal and glial cell reactions in retinae of rats with experimental glaucoma. Exp Brain Res. 2000;132:476–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Guo Y, Johnson E, Cepurna W, Jia L, Dyck J, Morrison JC. Does elevated intraocular pressure reduce retinal TRKB-mediated survival signaling in experimental glaucoma? Exp Eye Res. 2009;89:921–933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Guo Y, Cepurna WO, Dyck J, Doser T, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Retinal cell responses to elevated intraocular pressure: a gene array comparison between the whole retina and retinal ganglion cell layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3003–3018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Barron MJ, Griffiths P, Turnbull DM, Bates D, Nichols P. The distributions of mitochondria and sodium channels reflect the specific energy requirements and conduction properties of the human optic nerve head. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:286–290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Sun D, Lye-Barthel M, Masland RH, Jakobs TC. The morphology and spatial arrangement of astrocytes in the optic nerve head of the mouse. J Comp Neurol. 2009;516:1–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Bussow H. The astrocytes in the retina and optic nerve head of mammals: a special glia for the ganglion cell axons. Cell Tissue Res. 1980;206:367–378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Trivino A, Ramirez JM, Salazar JJ, Ramirez AI, Garcia-Sanchez J. Immunohistochemical study of human optic nerve head astroglia. Vision Res. 1996;36:2015–2028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Avignone E, Ulmann L, Levavasseur F, Rassendren F, Audinat E. Status epilepticus induces a particular microglial activation state characterized by enhanced purinergic signaling. J Neurosci. 2008;28:9133–9144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Orr AG, Orr AL, Li XJ, Gross RE, Traynelis SF. Adenosine A(2A) receptor mediates microglial process retraction. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:872–878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Fujita H, Zhang B, Sato K, Tanaka J, Sakanaka M. Expressions of neuropilin-1, neuropilin-2 and semaphorin 3A mRNA in the rat brain after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Brain Res. 2001;914:1–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Gallagher PJ, Jin Y, Killough G, Blue EK, Lindner V. Alterations in expression of myosin and myosin light chain kinases in response to vascular injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2000;279:C1078–C1087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Beck H, Acker T, Puschel AW, Fujisawa H, Carmeliet P, Plate KH. Cell type-specific expression of neuropilins in an MCA-occlusion model in mice suggests a potential role in post-ischemic brain remodeling. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:339–350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Zhang F, Tang Z, Hou X, et al. VEGF-B is dispensable for blood vessel growth but critical for their survival, and VEGF-B targeting inhibits pathological angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:6152–6157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Li Y, Zhang F, Nagai N, et al. VEGF-B inhibits apoptosis via VEGFR-1–mediated suppression of the expression of BH3-only protein genes in mice and rats. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:913–923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Fischer C, Mazzone M, Jonckx B, Carmeliet P. FLT1 and its ligands VEGFB and PlGF: drug targets for anti-angiogenic therapy? Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:942–956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Lindner V, Wang Q, Conley BA, Friesel RE, Vary CP. Vascular injury induces expression of periostin: implications for vascular cell differentiation and migration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:77–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. He S, Prasanna G, Yorio T. Endothelin-1-mediated signaling in the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in astrocytes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3737–3745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Ajemian A, Ness R, David S. Tenascin in the injured rat optic nerve and in non-neuronal cells in vitro: potential role in neural repair. J Comp Neurol. 1994;340:233–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Cario-Toumaniantz C, Boularan C, Schurgers LJ, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in human varicose veins: involvement of matrix gla protein in extracellular matrix remodeling. J Vasc Res. 2007;44:444–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Abeles D, Kwei S, Stavrakis G, Zhang Y, Wang ET, Garcia-Cardena G. Gene expression changes evoked in a venous segment exposed to arterial flow. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:863–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Chapados R, Abe K, Ihida-Stansbury K, et al. ROCK controls matrix synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells: coupling vasoconstriction to vascular remodeling. Circ Res. 2006;99:837–844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Strom A, Olin AI, Aspberg A, Hultgardh-Nilsson A. Fibulin-2 is present in murine vascular lesions and is important for smooth muscle cell migration. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69:755–763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Maddahi A, Chen Q, Edvinsson L. Enhanced cerebrovascular expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 via the MEK/ERK pathway during cerebral ischemia in the rat. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Brekken RA, Sullivan MM, Workman G, et al. Expression and characterization of murine hevin (SC1), a member of the SPARC family of matricellular proteins. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004;52:735–748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









