Abstract
Mitochondria have their own translational machineries for the synthesis of thirteen polypeptide chains that are components of the complexes that participate in the process of oxidative phosphorylation (or ATP generation). Translation initiation in mammalian mitochondria requires two initiation factors, IF2mt and IF3mt, instead of the three that are present in eubacteria. The mammalian IF2mt possesses a unique 37 amino acid insertion domain, which is known to be important for the formation of the translation initiation complex. We have obtained a three-dimensional cryoelectron microscopic map of the mammalian IF2mt in complex with initiator and the eubacterial ribosome. We find that the 37 amino acid insertion domain interacts with the same binding site on the ribosome that would be occupied by the eubacterial initiation factor IF1, which is absent in mitochondria. Our finding suggests that the insertion domain of IF2mt mimics the function of eubacterial IF1, by blocking the ribosomal aminoacyl-tRNA binding site (A site) at the initiation step.
Keywords: protein synthesis, ribosome–IF2mt complex, cryo-EM structure, molecular modeling
Protein synthesis entails a complex series of events in which the ribosome interacts with a number of ligands and translation factors so as to conduct an efficient, accurate, and well-regulated process (1). The first event in translation is the initiation step, which requires the formation of an initiation complex, composed of the small ribosomal subunit (30S, in eubacteria), mRNA, initiator tRNA () and three initiation factors (IF1, IF2, and IF3) (2). IF3 helps in preparation of the 30S initiation complex by preventing premature docking of the large subunit (50S, in eubacteria) (3, 4). IF2 promotes the binding of the initiator tRNA to the peptidyl (P) site of the 30S subunit and facilitates the association of the 50S subunit to form the 70S initiation complex (5). Initiation factor IF1, together with IF2, stabilizes the 30S initiation complex (6). IF1 also plays a role in translation initiation fidelity in conjunction with IF3 (7–9). The binding site of IF1 overlaps with that of the aminoacyl-tRNA on the 30S subunit (the A site), thereby making this site unavailable for the initiator tRNA during translation initiation (10–13). However, no equivalent of eubacterial IF1 has been detected in mammalian mitochondria (14); mitochondrial protein synthesis requires only two initiation factors, IF2mt and IF3mt.
There is a lack of consensus in the nomenclature used to describe the domains of IF2 by biochemists (15–18) and structural biologists (12, 19). A uniform nomenclature that addresses both structural and functional considerations was used in our previous study (20). According to this nomenclature the approximately 98 kDa Escherichia coli IF2 is composed of six domains (Fig. 1A). Domains I and II are not present in all of the eubacterial factors, are not highly conserved, and are also absent in the mammalian IF2mt. Domain VI is divided into two structural subdomains, VI C1 and VI C2. IF2mt is composed of four domains (III–VI) that are homologous to their eubacterial counterparts (21). In addition, IF2mt possesses an insertion domain of 37 amino acid (aa) residues between domains V and VI that is not present in E. coli IF2 (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1). Mutations in this insertion domain severely affect the ability of IF2mt to bind to the mitochondrial small subunit and to promote formation of the initiation complex (18). Recent studies have indicated that IF2mt can replace both eubacterial IF2 and IF1 in an E. coli strain with IF2 and IF1 gene knockouts (20). However, deletion of the 37-aa insertion from IF2mt necessitates the presence of IF1 in E. coli. This observation suggests that the 37-aa insertion in IF2mt functionally substitutes for eubacterial IF1. As in the case of IF2mt, IF3mt also has significant structural differences when compared to eubacterial IF3. IF3mt shares a central conserved region with eubacterial IF3; in addition, IF3mt possesses unique approximately 30-aa long extensions at the N- and C-termini (22). Biochemical studies have shown that these extensions are important for proper dissociation of IF3mt from the initiation complex (23).
The binding sites of eubacterial initiation factors to eubacterial ribosomes have been studied both by chemical methods (10, 24) and by cryoelectron microscopy [cryo-EM; IF3 (3), IF2 (12, 13, 25)]. The binding site of IF1, smallest of the three, has also been determined by X-ray crystallography (11). IF1 binds to the 30S ribosomal subunit; it sits in a pocket formed by the components of the 16S rRNA helices 18 and 44, and ribosomal protein S12 (11). IF2 makes extensive contacts with both ribosomal subunits. The G domain of IF2 interacts with the GTPase-associated center in the 50S ribosomal subunit, whereas the factor’s domain VI interacts with proteins L14 and L16 on the 50S ribosomal subunit (12). IF2 also interacts with a large area of the 30S subunit through domain V. In addition, domain VI interacts with the CCA region of the initiator tRNA within the initiation complex. Here we show, using cryo-EM and 3D image reconstruction techniques that a 37 amino acid insertion present in the sequence of IF2mt interacts with the same binding site on the small subunit of the ribosome that would be occupied by the eubacterial initiation factor IF1. Our finding suggests that the insertion domain of IF2mt mimics the function of eubacterial IF1 by structurally occupying the same binding site.
Results and Discussion
Structure of the Complex.
To determine how the 37-aa insertion domain of IF2mt can mimic the function of eubacterial IF1 (20), we prepared an initiation complex of E. coli 70S ribosomes in which the eubacterial IF1 and IF2 were replaced by IF2mt, and then obtained the 3D structure of the complex by single-particle cryo-EM technique (26) (see Materials and Methods). A comparison of the cryo-EM map of the initiation complex (Fig. 1B and Fig. S2 for stereo viewing) with that of the control 70S ribosome revealed several distinct extra densities of mass in the intersubunit space that can be readily assigned to IF2mt, the initiator (in the P/I position, see below) (12), and a deacylated tRNA at the ribosomal exit (E) site. The density corresponding to IF2mt makes extensive contacts with the ribosome, spanning major portions of the intersubunit surfaces of both ribosomal subunits (Fig. 1 C and D). On the interface side of the 30S subunit, the IF2mt density extends from the lower body region up to the decoding center, with a protruding mass occupying the position of the A-site tRNA. On the 50S subunit, the IF2mt density spans the GTPase-associated center and extends slightly beyond the ribosomal P site, where it maintains its interaction with the acceptor end of the initiator tRNA. The overall binding position of IF2mt on the 70S ribosome (Fig. 1B) closely matches to that of eubacterial IF2 (12), EF-G (27, 28), and EF-Tu (29, 30).
Structure of the Complex.
To analyze the molecular interactions between different domains of IF2mt and the ribosome, we built a composite homology model of bovine IF2mt based on: the X-ray crystallographic structure of an archaeal IF2 (aIF5B) from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID code 1G7T] (19), the NMR structures of the C1 (PDB ID code 1Z9B) (31), and C2 (PDB ID code 1D1N) (32) portions of the IF2’s domain VI from Bacillus stearothermophilus. The model took into account the corresponding sequence alignments between IF2mt and the homologous archaeal and eubacterial IF2 sequences and the cryo-EM density map (see Materials and Methods and SI Text for additional details). Our model of IF2mt shows a close structural resemblance to the corresponding regions in the atomic structures of the archaeal and eubacterial IF2 (Fig. S3), with the only major exception being the structure of the 37-aa insert that extends between domain V and the C1 portion of Domain VI (Fig. 2). This 37 aa insert was modeled separately, using the program I-TASSER (33). The compact structural domain formed by 3 α-helices of the insertion segment does not match the OB fold β-strand-rich X-ray crystallographic structure of the nonhomologous IF1 from Thermus thermophilus (11) (see SI Text). The N-terminal fragment (domain III, corresponding to aa 78–176) of the protein could not be modeled in the final structure. (Note that aa 1–77 constitute the signal sequence, which is cleaved off when IF2mt is imported into the mitochondrion; consequently, they are not present in the mature protein.) However, our cryo-EM map does show an extra mass (marked by an * in Fig. 2), which extends from the lower part of the IF2mt and its long axis is directed toward the small ribosomal subunit; that feature can snugly accommodate the 99-aa domain III, and is therefore tentatively assigned to domain III of IF2mt. The final atomic model of IF2mt was obtained by flexible fitting into the cryo-EM density corresponding to IF2mt (Fig. 2) using the Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting (MDFF) protocol (34). An atomic structure of the tRNA (PDB code 1ZO3) (12) was fit into the densities that correspond to the initiator and E-site tRNAs. The fitting of the atomic model of the initiator tRNA () into the corresponding cryo-EM density revealed a distortion in the ribosome-bound tRNA, the anticodon stem-loop occupied the P-site position on the 30S subunit, whereas the CCA end occupied a position between the canonical P and E sites, referred to as the initiator tRNA binding position [or P/I position (12)], on the large ribosomal subunit. The C2 portion of IF2mt’s domain VI interacts with the CCA end of the initiator tRNA, and apparently helps dock the tRNAi in its proper orientation on the ribosome. Because the CCA end of the initiator tRNA is not positioned in the canonical P site, and the A site on the 30S subunit is still occupied by the insertion domain of IF2mt, the present complex corresponds to a functional intermediate state between the 30S and 70S initiation complexes.
Interaction Between IF2mt and the Ribosome.
The crystal structure of the E. coli large ribosomal subunit (PDB code 2AW4) (35) and the crystal structure of the T. thermophilus small ribosomal subunit in complex with IF1 (11) (PDB code 1HR0) were fit into the corresponding portions of the cryo-EM map and used to identify (i) segments of the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and (ii) ribosomal proteins that interact with various structural domains of IF2mt. Dockings of all molecular structures into the cryo-EM map showed that domains V and VI C1 of IF2mt interact with the 30S ribosomal subunit (Fig. 3A), mainly through its two 16S rRNA helices: h5 [nucleotides (nt) 55–56] and h15 (nt 368). Domain V is also in close proximity, within 5–10 Å, to 16S rRNA helix h14. The 37-aa insertion present in IF2mt fits tightly into the cryo-EM density feature that is close to the decoding region of the 30S subunit (Fig. 2). This region of the subunit is a pocket formed by the 530 loop (h18) and the tip of h44 of the 16S rRNA, and protein S12. We find that the above ribosomal components each undergo relative shifts to interact with the 37-aa insertion domain of IF2mt (Fig. S4). Therefore, atomic structures of each of the binding-pocket components (11) were individually fit into the cryo-EM density map, to allow us to delineate interactions. The insertion domain interacts with nts 517–519 and 530–531 of h18; nts 1397, 1411, and 1492–1493 of h44; and aa residue Leu52 of protein S12. The aa residues that form the linker between the insert and the rest of IF2mt interact with Arg41-Thr44, whereas domain VI CI contacts Arg59 and Glu79-His80 of S12. Because each of the above ribosomal components are conserved between E. coli and mammalian mitochondria (36), it is likely that the mode of interaction of the insertion domain is the same with small mitoribosomal subunit. IF2mt makes extensive contacts with the 50S ribosomal subunit as well (Fig. 3B). The G and VI C1 domains of IF2mt interact with the sarcin/ ricin loop (H95) of the 23S rRNA at nts 2660–2661 and 2662–2663, respectively. Domain VI C2 contacts nts 2482-2483 of H89. In addition, the insertion and VI C1 domains are in close proximities (within 4–6 Å) to the 23S rRNA helix H69 (nts 1913–1915) and protein L14 (Lys51), respectively.
Role of the 37 Amino Acid Insert in IF2mt.
As mentioned earlier, for interpretation of the 30S subunit portion of the cryo-EM map, we used the X-ray crystallographic structure of the 30S•IF1 complex (11), to enable assessment of the relative positions of IF1 and IF2mt. This analysis revealed that the eubacterial IF1 and the 37-aa insertion domain of IF2mt occupy the same binding pocket on the 30S subunit (11) (Fig. 4 and Table S1). Despite the fact that the length of the IF2mt insertion is only about half of that of eubacterial IF1 (37 aa vs. 72 aa), their overlapping binding positions on the ribosome suggest that the insert plays a functional role similar to that of IF1 in eubacteria. Furthermore, there is no significant similarity between the sequences of the 37-aa insertion and IF1 (Fig. S5). However, surfaces of both IF1 and the 37-aa insertion that interact with the 30S subunit show resemblance in their overall charge distribution; i.e., both surfaces have strong patches of electropositive charge (Fig. 5 A and B). Our study suggests that the functional similarity between the IF1 and the 37-aa insertion (20) is likely because they both sterically block the ribosomal A site (Fig. 4), thereby promoting binding of the initiator tRNA to the ribosomal P site during translation initiation.
Notably, the smallest of the eubacterial initiation factors has been physically integrated into IF2mt. The mitochondrial matrix is densely crowded (approximately 800 mg/mL of protein) compared to the cytoplasm of an E. coli cell (approximately 300 mg/mL of proteins) (37). In addition, the structure of the mitochondrion is characterized by the convoluted cristae that form the inner membrane (38). Such topologically intricate structural organization, combined with the matrix density, could hinder smaller factors of the size of eubacterial IF1 from finding their target sites. Furthermore, because mitochondrial initiation factors are present in very low amounts [less than 20 copies per mitochondrion (39)], diffusion restrictions could pose problems for efficient initiation of translation. We hypothesize that, over the course of evolution, the mitochondrial version of IF1 was eliminated; instead, a smaller peptide bearing its function became an integral part of the larger IF2mt factor. Such transfer of structural and functional characteristics of IF1 to the IF2mt molecule would eliminate the necessity to import a very small polypeptide such as IF1, which is as small as some of the import (signal) sequences, from the cytoplasm into the mitochondrial inner matrix.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of the Complex.
Reassociated 70S ribosomes were prepared as described by Blaha and coworkers (41), using crude ribosomes prepared from E. coli. The 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits were purified by dissociation of crude ribosomes on 10–30% sucrose gradients in a buffer containing 1 mM MgAc2. Ribosomal subunits were reassociated by incubation for 20 min at 25 °C in reassociation buffer (20 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.6, 10 mM MgAc2, 30 mM KCl, and 4 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and subsequently purified on 10–30% sucrose gradients containing 10 mM MgAc2. Reassociated 70S ribosomes were pelleted at 40,000 × g for 27 h and resuspended in reassociation buffer. Mammalian mitochondrial translation initiation factors were expressed and purified as described previously (42). Ribosome activity was quantified by in vitro binding assays (18), using 0.2 μM 70S ribosomes and 1 μM in the presence of saturating levels of initiation factors (1 μM). Formation of the complex was optimized by testing binding with various buffer conditions. Assays showed that IF3mt is necessary to stimulate binding of IF2mt. The optimal magnesium ion concentration for activity with the nonhydrolyzable GTP-analog (GDPNP) was 5 mM. Microcon (100 kDa cut-off) centrifugation (23) using 0.2 μM 70S ribosomes with 0, 0.32, and 0.64 μM IF2mt, followed by SDS-PAGE analysis confirmed that 80% of the ribosomes contained IF2mt. A complex in 25 μL was prepared containing 70S reassociated ribosomes (1 μM) with a 10-fold excess of the mitochondrial initiation factors (10 μM) in the presence of 5 μM (43), 10 μM mRNA including a Shine–Dalgarno sequence GGCAAGGAGGAAUAAAAAUGUUCGCACGU (obtained from Dharmacon), 0.5 mM GDPNP, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl2, 80 mM KCl, and 1 mM dithiothreitol, by incubation at 25 °C for 20 min. The 70S ribosomes used for complex formation were 60% active in initiation complex formation. The complex was fast-frozen in a dry-ice isopropanol bath and stored at -80 °C.
Cryo-Electron Microscopy, Image Processing, and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.
Cryo-EM grids were prepared according to standard procedures (44). Data were collected on a Philips FEI Tecnai F20 field emission gun electron microscope with a magnification of 50,760. 392 micrographs were scanned on a Zeiss flatboard scanner with a step size of 14 μm, corresponding to 2.76 Å on the object scale and were sorted into 43 defocus groups. A total of 426,091 images were manually selected. SPIDER (45) was used for all image processing, including 2D image classification, reconstruction, and refinement. A previously determined cryo-EM structure of the 70S ribosome was used as the reference to align images for an initial reconstruction from fewer images, using projection matching procedure. The 3D volume so obtained was low pass filtered and used subsequently for alignment of a larger dataset. The original reconstruction and subsequent refinement yielded a weak mass of density corresponding to IF2mt, as expected from the biochemical data showing partial occupancy of the factor on the ribosome. To enhance the density of the factor in the 70S ribosome complex, the method of supervised classification was applied (46). In supervised classification, the experimental images are realigned using 2D projections generated from two different reference maps, which in this case were the maps of a vacant 70S ribosome and a complex of the 70S ribosome in complex with IF1, IF2, IF3, , and mRNA (12). 313,315 particle images (approximately 70% of the original total population, after removing images with poorer cross-correlation coefficient values with respect to reference projection images) were used in the supervised classification. 256,191 particle images classified with the projection images generated from the map of the IF2-bound 70S ribosome. The 3D map determined from these images showed an enhanced density for IF2mt. However, our IF2mt cryo-EM density did not show the mass assigned by Allen and coworkers (12) to the N-terminus of E. coli IF2, thereby excluding the possibility of any reference bias due to use of the map of the E. coli 70S initiation complex (12) as a reference. To further enhance the structure of the complex, another round of supervised classification was applied using the particles that had aligned to the projection images of the map of the IF2-bound 70S ribosome. In the next and final round, the newly reconstructed structure from the previous round was used as one of the two references. The other reference was a map of a factor-free, vacant ribosome. 121,742 particles classified with the complex, and 135,323 particles classified with the vacant ribosome. After this round of classification of the dataset, the resolution of the cryo-EM map of the complex improved slightly to 10.8 Å (at 0.5 cutoff of FSC), or 9.0 Å (using 0.143 cutoff of FSC) (47); however, the map showed much stronger density for IF2mt, explaining all of the structural domains of the factor and the bound tRNAs. Modeling and fitting were done using O (48) and visualization was done using Chimera software (49).
Construction of the Atomic Model of IF2mt.
The IF2mt sequence shows an additional 37 aa between domains V and VI when compared to the E. coli IF1 sequence, but shows an additional 49 aa when compared to the archaeal M. thermautotropicum IF2 (aIF5B) sequences (Fig. S1). This 49-aa insert includes the 37-aa insert obtained by comparison to the E. coli IF2 sequence, with additional 3 N-terminal and 9 C-terminal flanking aa residues. Therefore, the initial homology model for IF2mt was constructed using MODELLER (50) and the M. thermautotrophicum IF2 X-ray crystallographic structure (PDB ID 1G7T) (19) as the structural template, by excluding this 49 aa insert. The sequence alignment between M. thermautotrophicum and IF2mt sequences is weaker for the C1 and C2 portions of domain VI. Better sequence alignment for these two regions is obtained with the B. stearothermophilus IF2 domains VI C1 and C2, for which solution NMR structures [PDB IDs 1Z9B (31) and 1D1N (32)] have been solved (Table S2). Homology models were constructed separately using MODELLER for these domain VI regions based on alignments for the IF2mt sequence with defined secondary structure regions of the NMR structures (Figs. S1 and S3). These homology models for the VI C1 and VI C2 domains were structurally aligned with the model constructed using the M. thermautotrophicum IF2 using the program RAPIDO (51) and then incorporated to create a continuous composite model.
The 49 aa residues, present in the IF2mt sequence but absent in the archael IF2 sequence and crystal structure, were modeled separately using the I-TASSER server (33), which predicted a compact structure with 3 α-helices. This helical nature agrees with the secondary structure prediction for this sequence using JPred (52). This 49-residue model was then covalently linked to the rest of the modeled IF2 using the program loopy (53) to predict a structure for linker regions with a minimal number of residues to obtain a complete continuous structure. The binding site densities of this 49 residue region and the remainder of the IF2 are spatially separated in the cryo-EM map and required linker loops of 11 residues on the N-terminal side and 6 residues on the C-terminal side of the insert sequence, resulting in melting some of the helical structure of the 49 residue I-TASSER model. It is certainly possible that some of the secondary structure elements seen in the homologous M. thermautotrophicum or B. stearothermophilus IF2 structures refold into a different topology in IF2mt to accommodate the additional 49 residues, but we chose to preserve the known folds as much as possible by minimizing the number of residues assigned to the linker regions.
The resulting composite homology model (Fig. S3, Center) of the entire IF2mt was minimized using the Steepest Descent minimization algorithm in the program CHARMM (54) until an energy gradient convergence criterion of 0.01 was met. This minimized model was initially fit as a rigid body into the cryo-EM density corresponding to IF2mt and then flexibly fit using the SCX module of the Yup program (55), with a step factor of 1.0 and a temperature of 2 °K to an average goodness of fit of 0.62, and then minimized again using the above criteria. The fit of the model was further refined by flexible fitting using MDFF (34). This final model fits extremely well into the excised IF2mt cryo-EM density, as judged by high cross-correlation coefficient (CCC) value of 0.85 calculated between the cryo-EM density corresponding to IF2mt and the fitted IF2mt model (Table S2). The CCC values between the fitted X-ray coordinates and the corresponding cryo-EM density maps were determined after conversion of the fitted coordinates into the density map, through computation of averaged densities within volume elements scale-matched to those of the cryo-EM map (i.e., with a pixel size of 2.76 Å) and after filtration of the atomic model to the resolution of the cryo-EM density map (27). The achievable accuracy of fittings of atomic models into cryo-EM maps has been estimated to be in the range of 1/6 to 1/10 of the resolution of the cryo-EM map (see ref. 56); this would yield approximately 1.8 Å in our case.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Timothy Booth for some of the cryo-EM data collection, and Tanvir Shaikh for help with image processing. We also thank Manjuli Sharma and Takeshi Yokoyama for helpful discussions. N.K.B. gratefully acknowledges Wadsworth Center new investigator funds for equipment support. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 GM61576 (R.K.A.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data deposition: The cryo-EM map of the complex and the extracted density corresponding to the tRNA•IF2mt complex have been deposited in the EM database, http://emdep.rutgers.edu (accession codes EMD-1854 and EMD-1855). The modeled and fitted coordinates of IF2mt and relevant components of the ribosome structure have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.rcsb.org (PDB ID codes 3IZY and 3IZZ).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1017425108/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Ramakrishnan V. Ribosome structure and the mechanism of translation. Cell. 2002;108:557–572. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00619-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gualerzi CO, Pon CL. Initiation of mRNA translation in prokaryotes. Biochemistry. 1990;29:5881–5889. doi: 10.1021/bi00477a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McCutcheon JP, et al. Location of translational initiation factor IF3 on the small ribosomal subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4301–4306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grigoriadou C, Marzi S, Pan D, Gualerzi CO, Cooperman BS. The translational fidelity function of IF3 during transition from the 30 S initiation complex to the 70 S initiation complex. J Mol Biol. 2007;373:551–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.La Teana A, Gualerzi CO, Dahlberg AE. Initiation factor IF 2 binds to the alpha-sarcin loop and helix 89 of Escherichia coli 23S ribosomal RNA. RNA. 2001;7:1173–1179. doi: 10.1017/s1355838201010366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wintermeyer W, Gualerzi C. Effect of Escherichia coli initiation factors on the kinetics of N-Acphe-tRNAPhe binding to 30S ribosomal subunits. A fluorescence stopped-flow study. Biochemistry. 1983;22:690–694. doi: 10.1021/bi00272a025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pon CL, Gualerzi CO. Mechanism of protein biosynthesis in prokaryotic cells. Effect of initiation factor IF1 on the initial rate of 30 S initiation complex formation. FEBS Lett. 1984;175:203–207. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(84)80737-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Milon P, Konevega AL, Gualerzi CO, Rodnina MV. Kinetic checkpoint at a late step in translation initiation. Mol Cell. 2008;30:712–720. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qin D, Fredrick K. Control of translation initiation involves a factor-induced rearrangement of helix 44 of 16S ribosomal RNA. Mol Microbiol. 2009;71:1239–1249. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06598.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moazed D, Samaha RR, Gualerzi C, Noller HF. Specific protection of 16 S rRNA by translational initiation factors. J Mol Biol. 1995;248:207–210. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(95)80042-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Carter AP, et al. Crystal structure of an initiation factor bound to the 30 S ribosomal subunit. Science. 2001;291:498–501. doi: 10.1126/science.1057766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Allen GS, Zavialov A, Gursky R, Ehrenberg M, Frank J. The cryo-EM structure of a translation initiation complex from Escherichia coli. Cell. 2005;121:703–712. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simonetti A, et al. Structure of the 30S translation initiation complex. Nature. 2008;455:416–420. doi: 10.1038/nature07192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Koc EC, Spremulli LL. Identification of mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3 and examination of its role in initiation complex formation with natural mRNAs. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:35541–35549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202498200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gualerzi CO, Severini M, Spurio R, La Teana A, Pon CL. Molecular dissection of translation initiation factor IF2. Evidence for two structural and functional domains. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:16356–16362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Caserta E, et al. Translation initiation factor IF2 interacts with the 30 S ribosomal subunit via two separate binding sites. J Mol Biol. 2006;362:787–799. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Caserta E, et al. Ribosomal interaction of Bacillus stearothermophilus translation initiation factor IF2: characterization of the active sites. J Mol Biol. 2010;396:118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spencer AC, Spremulli LL. The interaction of mitochondrial translational initiation factor 2 with the small ribosomal subunit. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1750:69–81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Roll-Mecak A, Cao C, Dever TE, Burley SK. X-Ray structures of the universal translation initiation factor IF2/eIF5B: Conformational changes on GDP and GTP binding. Cell. 2000;103:781–792. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00181-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gaur R, et al. A single mammalian mitochondrial translation initiation factor functionally replaces two bacterial factors. Mol Cell. 2008;29:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee JH, Choi SK, Roll-Mecak A, Burley SK, Dever TE. Universal conservation in translation initiation revealed by human and archaeal homologs of bacterial translation initiation factor IF2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4342–4347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haque ME, Spremulli LL. Roles of the N- and C-terminal domains of mammalian mitochondrial initiation factor 3 in protein biosynthesis. J Mol Biol. 2008;384:929–940. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haque ME, Grasso D, Spremulli LL. The interaction of mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 3 with ribosomes: Evolution of terminal extensions in IF3mt. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:589–597. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dallas A, Noller HF. Interaction of translation initiation factor 3 with the 30S ribosomal subunit. Mol Cell. 2001;8:855–864. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00356-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Myasnikov AG, et al. Conformational transition of initiation factor 2 from the GTP- to GDP-bound state visualized on the ribosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005;12:1145–1149. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Frank J, Penczek P, Agrawal RK, Grassucci RA, Heagle AB. Three-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy of ribosomes. Methods Enzymol. 2000;317:276–291. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)17020-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Agrawal RK, Penczek P, Grassucci RA, Frank J. Visualization of elongation factor G on the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome: The mechanism of translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6134–6138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao YG, et al. The structure of the ribosome with elongation factor G trapped in the posttranslocational state. Science. 2009;326:694–699. doi: 10.1126/science.1179709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stark H, et al. Visualization of elongation factor Tu on the Escherichia coli ribosome. Nature. 1997;389:403–406. doi: 10.1038/38770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schmeing TM, et al. The crystal structure of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA. Science. 2009;326:688–694. doi: 10.1126/science.1179700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wienk H, et al. Solution structure of the C1-subdomain of Bacillus stearothermophilus translation initiation factor IF2. Protein Sci. 2005;14:2461–2468. doi: 10.1110/ps.051531305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meunier S, et al. Structure of the fMet-tRNA(fMet)-binding domain of B. stearothermophilus initiation factor IF2. EMBO J. 2000;19:1918–1926. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.8.1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Trabuco LG, Villa E, Schreiner E, Harrison CB, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: a practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Methods. 2009;49:174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schuwirth BS, et al. Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 A resolution. Science. 2005;310:827–834. doi: 10.1126/science.1117230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sharma MR, et al. Structure of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome reveals an expanded functional role for its component proteins. Cell. 2003;115:97–108. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00762-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Srere PA. The infrastructure of the mitochondrial matrix. Trends Biochem Sci. 1980;5:120–121. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mannella CA, Marko M, Buttle K. Reconsidering mitochondrial structure: new views of an old organelle. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22:37–38. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(96)30050-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liao HX, Spremulli LL. Identification and initial characterization of translational initiation factor 2 from bovine mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:13618–13622. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Selmer M, et al. Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science. 2006;313:1935–1942. doi: 10.1126/science.1131127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blaha G, et al. Preparation of functional ribosomal complexes and effect of buffer conditions on tRNA positions observed by cryoelectron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 2000;317:292–309. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)17021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Grasso DG, Christian BE, Spencer A, Spremulli LL. Overexpression and purification of mammalian mitochondrial translational initiation factor 2 and initiation factor 3. Methods Enzymol. 2007;430:59–78. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)30004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Graves MC, Spremulli LL. Activity of Euglena gracilis chloroplast ribosomes with procaryotic and eucaryotic initiation factors. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983;222:192–199. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90516-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grassucci RA, Taylor DJ, Frank J. Preparation of macromolecular complexes for cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:3239–3246. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shaikh TR, et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1941–1974. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Valle M, et al. Cryo-EM reveals an active role for aminoacyl-tRNA in the accommodation process. EMBO J. 2002;21:3557–3567. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rosenthal PB, Henderson R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J Mol Biol. 2003;333:721–745. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jones TA, Zou JY, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr A. 1991;47:110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993;234:779–815. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mosca R, Brannetti B, Schneider TR. Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins. 1999;34:508–519. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990301)34:4<508::aid-prot10>3.0.co;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:7432–7437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102179699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Brooks BR, et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem. 2009;30:1545–1614. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tan RKZ, Petrov AS, Harvey SC. YUP: A molecular simulation program for coarse-grained and multiscaled models. J Chem Theor Comput. 2006;2:529–540. doi: 10.1021/ct050323r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rossmann MG. Fitting atomic models into electron-microscopy maps. Acta Crystallogr D. 2000;56:1341–1349. doi: 10.1107/s0907444900009562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.