Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1968 Nov;61(3):909–916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.3.909

The catch property of ordinary muscle.

D M Wilson, J L Larimer
PMCID: PMC305414  PMID: 5246553

Full text

PDF
909

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bittner G. D. Differentiation of nerve terminals in the crayfish opener muscle and its functional significance. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Jun;51(6):731–758. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.6.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:543–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DUDEL J. PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION OF THE EXCITATORY NERVE TERMINAL IN THE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION OF THE CRAYFISH. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1963 Sep 9;277:537–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EDWARDS C., CHICHIBU S., HAGIWARA S. RELATION BETWEEN MEMBRANE POTENTIAL CHANGES AND TENSION IN BARNACLE MUSCLE FIBERS. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:225–234. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagiwara S., Takahashi K., Junge D. Excitation-contraction coupling in a barnacle muscle fiber as examined with voltage clamp technique. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Feb;51(2):157–175. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.2.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hidaka T., Osa T., Twarog B. M. The action of 5-hydroxytryptamine on Mytilus smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):869–877. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LOWY J., MILLMAN B. M., HANSON J. STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN SMOOTH TONIC MUSCLES OF LAMELLIBRANCH MOLLUSCS. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Oct 27;160:525–536. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PENNYCUICK C. J. RESPONSE OF FAST MUSCLE FIBRES TO SERIES OF IMPULSES. J Exp Biol. 1964 Jun;41:291–298. doi: 10.1242/jeb.41.2.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Partridge L. D., Huber F. C., Jr Factors in the interpretation of the electromyogram based on muscle to dynamic nerve signals. Am J Phys Med. 1967 Jun;46(3):1276–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Partridge L. D. Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1966 May;210(5):1178–1191. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.5.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TWAROG B. M. Innervation and activity of a molluscan smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:220–235. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Twarog B. M. Factors influencing contraction and catch in Mytilus smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):847–856. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. USHERWOOD P. N., GRUNDFEST H. PERIPHERAL INHIBITION IN SKELETAL MUSCLE OF INSECTS. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:497–518. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES