Abstract
Irradiation of 1,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxyquinolinone (DMQ) leads to excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) generating an 3-oxidoquinolinium species which undergoes [3+2] photocycloaddition with dipolarophiles. A parallel, fluorescence quenching assay using a microplate format has been developed to evaluate fluorescence quenching of this species with a range of dipolarophiles.
We have reported excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT)1 of 3-hydroxyflavone (3-HF) derivative 1 and photochemical [3+2] cycloaddition of the derived oxidopyrylium2 species 2 with methyl cinnamate 3 (Figure 1).3 The resulting cycloadduct 4 was subsequently transformed to the natural product methyl rocaglate 5. Nitrogen analogues of 3-hydroxyflavone including 1-methyl-2-methyl-3-hydroxyquinolinone (DMQ) (6)4 have been reported to undergo ESIPT to afford 3-oxidoquinolinium 7.5 This precedent prompted us to investigate the feasibility for photocycloaddition of oxidoquinolinium intermediates such as 7 with a variety of dipolarophiles as reaction partners.
Figure 1.
Photochemical cycloaddition of 3 and 3-hydroxyflavone 1 to access methyl rocaglate 5
In order to study the cycloaddition reactivity of DMQ 6 under UV irradiation in the presence of various dipolarophiles, we considered a parallel screening approach. A number of recent reports have outlined use of fluorescent probes for high throughput reaction development.6 Our initial plan was to take advantage of the inherent photochemical behavior of 6 to implement a parallel, fluorescence quenching assay. Under UV irradiation, 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6 undergoes rapid proton transfer (ns timescale) from its first excited state 6* leading to the formation of phototautomer species 7* which decays to 7 via fluorescence emission at 470 nm (Figure 2). 7 We envisioned that quenching of the fluorescence of transient intermediate 7* in the presence of a selection of dipolarophiles should provide an indication of photocycloaddition reactivity.8 In this paper, we report development of a parallel, fluorescence quenching assay using a microplate format to evaluate fluorescence quenching of this species with a range of dipolarophiles and correlation of the photophysical data with preparative photocycloadditions.
Figure 2.
ESIPT of 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6 (DMQ)
We first investigated the photophysical properties of 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6. UV/Vis spectra of 6 in various solvents showed an absorbance maximum at 370 nm (Figure 3)8 which was well separated from absorbances of most commonly encountered dipolarophiles such that selective light absorption by the heterocycle could be easily accomplished. Upon excitation at 350 nm, dual fluorescence associated with normal excited state 6* (400 nm) and tautomeric excited state 7* (470 nm) was observed. The latter emission related to ESIPT was characterized by an unusually large Stokes shift as expected and previously reported (Figure 3).4d The origin of this ESIPT emission was also confirmed by excitation spectra recorded at 470 nm and were found to be identical to the corresponding absorption spectra.8 The species 7* was also observed to have a fluorescence lifetime of 16.8 ns and a very high quantum yield of 0.65 in 1,4-dioxane.8 The latter lifetime should make 7* a trappable species in comparison to 6* whose lifetime is only 0.23 ns due to a very fast ESIPT rate. 2, 4b,d The relatively long absorption wavelength of DMQ and its inherent fluorescence properties were highly favorable for fluorescence quenching studies.
Figure 3.
Absorption and normalized fluorescence spectra of 6 (concentration is 45 μM; for fluorescence spectra, λex = 350 nm.)
To establish a relationship between photoreactivity and quenching behavior,9 we investigated fluorescence quenching7* by various dipolarophiles using a 96-well glass microtiter plate and a microplate reader. Microplate fluorescence measurements were performed in triplicate in black 96-well plates, using a SpectraMax Gemini XS fluorescence plate reader (Molecular Devices) (excitation wavelength: 350 nm; emission wavelength: 470 nm with a filter cutoff of 455 nm). Addition of 17 quenchers (Figure 4) to 1,4-dioxane solutions of 6 (the final concentration of 6 and quenchers were 0.08 mM and 50 mM, respectively) resulted in quenching of the fluorescence emission of 7* to varying extents.
Figure 4.
List of dipolarophiles used in fluorescence quenching and “heat map” of fluorescence measurements using a microplate reader a
a Fluorescence quenching data presented are an average of three data points,8 and have been normalized to a scale from 0 to 100% where 100% represents the fluorescence emission of DMQ in the absence of dipolarophile. A1 represents the emission of 80 μM DMQ in 200 μL of dioxane: Fluorescence emissions reported in the presence of 0.05 M dipolarophile were normalized according to A1. 3a: B1; 3b: C1; 3c: D1; 3d: E1; 3e: F1; 3f: A2; 3g: B2; 3h: C2; 3i: D2; 3j: E2; 3k: F2; 3l: A3; 3m: B3; 3n: C3; 3o: D3; 3p: E3; 3q: F3; Measurements were performed at an excitation wavelength of 350 nm and an emission wavelength of 470 nm with filter cutoff at 455 nm.
A summary of the fluorescence quenching results provided in the form of a “heat map” (Figure 4) shows that dipolarophiles can be categorized into three categories: strong quenchers (light green, 3a–3e), moderate quenchers, (dark green, 3f–3k) and poor quenchers (brownish red, 3l–3q). The quenching behavior can be roughly considered as an indicator for the efficiency of bimolecular interactions and therefore potential for photocycloaddition. Based on analysis of the quenching rates and considering that there might be a number of pathways to quench fluorescence, our expectation was that “poor quenchers” would not likely show photocycloaddition reactivity. Next, a photochemical reactivity screen with the series of dipolarophiles was conducted.10 We noticed no photoreactivity for poor quenchers and that about two thirds of strong and moderate quenchers showed photoreactivity. It should be noted that a number of strong quenchers (e.g. 3a, b, d, and e) did not afford photocycloadducts. We hypothesized that this poor reactivity may be attributed to quenching via charge-transfer mechansims in which the photoexcited aromatic (6* or 7*) serves as a charge donor to a carbonyl quencher.11 Other electron deficient alkenes which were found as reaction partners including methyl cinnamate 3c, methyl crotonate 3f, and methyl butynoate 3j possess electronic properties similar to methyl cinnamate, a workable dipolarophile in ESIPT-mediated photocycloaddition with 3-hydroxyflavones.3 When subjected to irradiation in 1,4-dioxane, dipolarophiles 3c and 3f showed photoreactivity with 6 (Scheme 1) to afford moderate yields of cycloadducts 8 and 9 along with some unknown polar byproducts.12 The structure of 8 was supported by X-ray crystal structure analysis of the derived bis-p-bromobenzoate 10.8 Using methyl butynoate 3j as dipolarophile, the presumed[3+2] cycloadduct 11 was not detected but the isomeric ketol 12 was formed, presumably because the doubly-conjugated enone provides a strong, thermodynamic driving force for α-ketol rearrangement.13
Scheme 1.
Photocycloaddition of 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6 and electron-deficient dipolarophiles.10
Under similar photochemical reaction conditions, two major products were isolated from the photocycloaddition of 6 and electron-rich dipolarophiles including indene 3g, ‘2,3-dimethylbutadiene 3h, and cyclohexadiene 3k in 1,4-dioxane (Scheme 2). The regio- and stereochemistry of endo cycloadducts 13–18 were deduced from spectroscopic analysis, including advanced NMR experiments (HMQC, HMBC, and NOESY).8 Chemical modification of products also provided further proof for structure determination. For example, careful hydrogenation (monitored by NMR to avoid over-reduction of the ketone moiety) of a mixture of cycloadducts 17 and 18 yielded only one saturated compound 19. This result further confirmed that those isomers share the same carbon skeleton and configuration (endo diastereoisomer). No [4+3] photocycloaddition14 products were isolated in photocycloadditions with diene reaction partners 3h and 3k.
Scheme 2.
Photocycloaddition of 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6 and electron-rich dipolarophiles.10
To establish a more quantitative relationship between photocycloaddition reactivity and quenching behavior, Stern-Volmer analyses15 were also examined. Data was plotted using Stern-Volmer analysis (F0/F =1 + kq τ [Q]) where F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of quencher, respectively, and [Q] is the concentration of quencher. Slopes (kq τ) were calculated by least-squares analysis; τ is the measured singlet life time of 7*. The calculated quenching constant kq (Table 1) can again be divided into three groups: strong quenchers (109 –1010, light green block in the “heatmap” (Figure 4)), moderate quenchers (~ 108, dark green block in “heatmap”), and poor quenchers (106–107 brown/red blocks in the “heatmap”) and are in overall agreement with our plate-reader data (Figure 3).
Table 1.
Rate constants for the quenching of 7* and diverse dipolarophilesa
quencher | 3a | 3b | 3c | 3d | 3e |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
kq (S−1 M−1) | 3.8 × 1010 | 3.8 × 1010 | 1.0 × 1010 | 0.8 × 1010 | 0.5 × 1010 |
3f | 3g | 3h | 3i | 3j | 3k |
9.5 × 108 | 3.8 × 108 | 2.5 × 108 | 1.3 × 108 | 1.3 × 108 | 1 × 108 |
3l | 3m | 3n | 3o | 3p | 3q |
2.4 × 107 | 1.7 × 107 | 1.4 × 107 | 1.2 × 107 | 1 × 107 | 0.5 × 107 |
Data was plotted using Stern-Volmer analysis: F0/F =1 + kq τ [Q], [DMQ] = 15 μM.
In conclusion, we have expanded our ESIPT/photocycloaddition methodology to the use of 3-hydroxyquinolinone substrates. A parallel, fluorescence quenching assay using a microplate format has been developed to evaluate fluorescence quenching of a range of dipolarophiles. Data from photophysical studies has been correlated with preparative photocycloadditions which have demonstrated access to novel nitrogen-containing, bicyclic frameworks. Further studies involving photocycloadditions of 3-hydroxyquinolinones and reaction screening of photochemical transformations are currently in progress and will be reported in due course.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the National Institutes of Health (GM073855) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr. Emil Lobkovsky (Cornell University) for X-ray crystallographic analysis and Dr. Stephane Roche and Mr. Neil Lajkiewicz (Boston University) for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, compound characterization data and X-ray crystallographic information files. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.(a) Martinez ML, Studer S, Chou PT. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:2427–2429. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ormson SM, Brown RG. Prog React Kinet. 1994;19:45–91. [Google Scholar]; (c) Le Gourrierec D, Ormson SM, Brown RG. Prog React Kinet. 1994;19:211–275. [Google Scholar]; (d) Chou PT. J Chi Chem Soc. 2001;48:651–682. [Google Scholar]
- 2.For photogeneration and cycloaddition of oxidopyryliums via silyl transfer, see: Wender PA, McDonald F. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:4956–4958.
- 3.(a) Gerard B, Jones G, Porco JA., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:13620–13621. doi: 10.1021/ja044798o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gerard B, Sangji S, O’Leary DJ, Porco JA., Jr J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:7754–7755. doi: 10.1021/ja062621j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Gerard B, Cencic R, Pelletier J, Porco JA., Jr Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46:7831–7834. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Roche SP, Cencic R, Pelletier J, Porco JA., Jr Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49:6533–6538. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Gao F, Johnson KF, Schlenoff JB. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 2. 1996:269–273. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yushchenko DA, Shvadchak VV, Klymchenko AS, Duportail Guy, Mely Y, Pivovarenko VG. New J Chem. 2006;30:774–781. [Google Scholar]; (c) Yushchenko DA, Shvadchak VV, Bilokin MD, Klymchenko AS, Duportial G, Mely Y, Pivovarenko VG. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2006;5:1038–1044. doi: 10.1039/b610054f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Yushchenko DA, Shvadchak VV, Klymchenko AS, Duportail G, Pivovarenko VG, Mely Y. J Phy Chem A. 2007;111:8986–8992. doi: 10.1021/jp071075t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Bilokin MD, Shvadchak VV, Yushchenko DA, Klymchenko AS, Duportail G, Mely Y, Pivovarenko VG. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:4714–4719. [Google Scholar]
- 5.For dipolar cycloadditions of oxidoquinolinium and oxidoisoquinolium ylides, see: Dennis N, Katritzky AR, Takeuchi Y. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1976;15:1–9. doi: 10.1002/anie.197600011.Katritzky AR, Dennis N. Chem Rev. 1989;89:827–861.Peese KM, Gin DY. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:8734–8735. doi: 10.1021/ja0625430.
- 6.(a) Copeland GT, Miller SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:11270–11271. [Google Scholar]; (b) Stauffer SR, Beare NA, Stambuli JP, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:4641–4642. doi: 10.1021/ja0157402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Stauffer SR, Hartwig JF. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6977–6985. doi: 10.1021/ja034161p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Tanaka F, Mase N, Barbas CF., III J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:3692–3693. doi: 10.1021/ja049641a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Angelovski G, Keraenen MD, Linnepe P, Grudzielanek S, Eilbracht P. Adv Syn Cat. 2006;348:1193–1199. [Google Scholar]; (e) Barder TE, Buchwald SL. Org Lett. 2007;9:137–139. doi: 10.1021/ol062802q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Rozhkov RV, Davisson VJ, Bergstrom DE. Adv Synth Catal. 2008;350:71–75. [Google Scholar]; (g) Guo H, Tanaka F. J Org Chem. 2009;74:2417–2424. doi: 10.1021/jo900013w. and references cited therein. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shvadchak VV, Mely Y, Duportail G, Piemont E, Klymchenko AS, Demchenko AP. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107:9522–9529. [Google Scholar]
- 8.See Supporting Information for complete experimental details.
- 9.(a) Barltrop JA, Coyle JD. Principles of Photochemistry. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; UK: 1978. [Google Scholar]; (b) Turro NJ. Modern Molecular Photochemistry. University Science Books; CA: 1991. [Google Scholar]; (c) Chou P, Martinez ML. Radiat Phys Chem. 1993;41:373–378. [Google Scholar]; (d) Kubo Y, Adachi T, Miyahara N, Nakajima S, Inamura I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:9477–9480. [Google Scholar]; (e) Lewis WG, Magallon FG, Fokin VV, Finn MG. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:9152–9153. doi: 10.1021/ja048425z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Experimental procedure: A solution of 3-hydroxyquinolinone 6 (0.25 mmol) and dipolarophile (20 equiv) of dipolarophile in 6 mL of anhydrous 1,4-dioxane was degassed with argon for 5 min, then irradiated (Hanovia UV lamp, Pyrex filter) using an ethylene glycol cooling system for 14 h. The solution was concentrated in vacuo to afford an orange-brown oil. Purification via flash chromatography on silica gel (50:50 hexanes/CH2Cl2 to 100% CH2Cl2) afforded the cycloadduct.
- 11.For quenching of photoexcited aromatics by charge-transfer, see: Busch D, Dahm L, Siwicke B, Ricci WR. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977;51:4489–4492.
- 12.During reactions, decomposition of starting materials or unidentfied reactions pathways may lead to the formation of polar byproducts which were difficult to fully characterize.
- 13.For a review on the α-ketol rearrangement, see: Paquette LA, Hofferberth JE. Organic Reactions. 2003;62:477–567.
- 14.(a) Hoffmann HMR. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1984;23:1–19. [Google Scholar]; (b) Harmata M, Rashatasakhon P. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:2371– 2395. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lakowicz JR. Principle of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1997. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.