Summary
Frizzled/Planar Cell Polarity (Fz/PCP) signaling controls the orientation of sensory bristles and cellular hairs (trichomes) along the antero-posterior axis of the Drosophila thorax (notum) [1–4]. A subset of the trichome-producing notum cells differentiate as “tendon cells”, serving as attachment sites for the indirect flight muscles (IFMs) to the exoskeleton [5]. Through the analysis of chascon (chas), a gene identified by its ability to disrupt Fz/PCP signaling under overexpression conditions, and jitterbug (jbug)/filamin [6], we show that maintenance of antero-posterior planar polarization requires the notum epithelia to balance mechanical stress generated by the attachment of the IFMs. chas is expressed in notum tendon cells and its loss-of-function disturbs cellular orientation at and near the regions where IFMs attach to the epidermis. This effect is independent of the Fz/PCP and fat (ft)/dachsous (ds) systems [7]. The chas phenotype arises during normal shortening of the IFMs [8] and is suppressed by genetic ablation of the IFMs. chas acts through jbug/filamin and cooperates with MyosinII to modulate the mechano-response of notum tendon cells. These observations support the notion that the ability of epithelia to respond to mechanical stress generated by interaction(s) with other tissues during development/organogenesis influences the maintenance of its shape and PCP features.
Results and Discussion
chascon is required to orient trichomes and bristles on the Drosophila notum
chascon (chas) was identified in an EP gain-of-function (GOF) screen for genes affecting wing morphogenesis [9]. chas encodes two isoforms, containing multiple predicted Src-homology and PDZ domain binding sites but no catalytic or conserved protein interaction domains, suggesting an adaptor or scaffold function (Figure S1 and not shown). Expression of either chas isoform in the posterior compartment of wing discs resulted in defects in cellular polarity, misplaced actin hair formation, and loss of asymmetric Fmi and Fz localization (Figure S1), suggesting that Chas can disturb PCP establishment and the localization of core Fz/PCP components [10]. chas GOF also displayed PCP defects in other tissues (e.g. ommatidial under-rotation in the eye, not shown). In the notum, Chas expression under pannier-GAL4 (pnrG4; expressed centrally in thorax, Fig. 1A) resulted in orientation and morphologic defects of bristles and trichomes (Figure 1B).
To ask whether chas is necessary for PCP and/or morphogenesis we generated UAS-dsRNA constructs targeting chasA (chasAiR) and used a VDRC UAS-dsRNA to a common exon (chasABiR) (Figure S1). pnrG4 driven chasABiR or chasAiR resulted in notum bristles and trichomes pointing to the midline and multiple trichomes/cell (Figure 1C,F). Epidermal indentations were observed in most anterior notum regions (Figure 1C,F). As both dsRNAs showed indistinguishable phenotypes, we used chasABiR for subsequent studies. To confirm this, we generated a chas loss-of-function (LOF) allele (chas1; via FLP-FRT deletion method [11]), lacking both 5′UTRs and start codons (Figure S1). chas1 animals were viable, fertile and displayed notal PCP and indentation defects similar to pnrG4>chasABiR (Figure 1E; no defects were observed in other tissues in chas1 or chasABiR animals). chas1/Df, tubG4>chasABiR, and chas1 animals displayed similar defects, suggesting chas1 is a strong LOF or null allele (Figure S1). These LOF conditions exhibited weaker phenotypes than regional dsRNA gene knockdown or chas1 clones (Figure 1C,E–G,J; compare 1J medial domain with Figure S1), suggesting that differences in chas levels between mutant and adjacent wild-type tissue enhance polarity defects. chas1 defects were rescued by either Chas isoform in clones (MARCM[12]), confirming chas1 specificity (Figure S1). Furthermore, chas1 clones or regional knockdown influenced non-autonomously the orientation of wild-type cells, similar to fz- clones (Figure 1G–I; Figure S1).
chascon acts in parallel to the Fz/PCP-signaling
In the notum, Fz/PCP-signaling is required early to orient asymmetric divisions of SOPs and later to polarize cellular trichomes and bristle cells along the body axis (Figure S2) [2, 3, 13]. chas LOF did not affect the orientation of asymmetric SOP divisions (not shown). Thus chas appeared to act later, possibly interacting with Fz/PCP-signaling during PCP establishment in the notum epidermis (Figure S2). We explored the epistatic relationships between chas and Fz/PCP-core members. Strikingly, chas1;fzp21 double mutants displayed a novel phenotype, with bristles and trichomes being reoriented towards the anterior (Figure 2A–C′,F; see Fig. S2 for related genotypes). These data suggested that chas and Fz/PCP-signaling work in parallel to polarize the notum epidermis.
As in other organs, the first signs of PCP in notal epidermal cells are asymmetric localizations of Fz/PCP-core components, evident from 24hAPF (hours after puparium formation) onwards (not shown) [10]. The localization/levels of Fz and Fmi were not affected in pnrG4>chasABiR animals at 30hAPF (Figure 2G–I′; compare with 2J–J′), further supporting the notion that chas and Fz/PCP-signaling act in parallel to promote PCP on the notum.
The fat (ft)/dachsous (ds) system controls PCP establishment in parallel to Fz/PCP-signaling [14], so we tested whether chas works through this system. The nota of strong ds combinations (ds38k/dsUA071), or pnrG4 driven ftiR, dsiR, display bristles that are slightly oriented laterally (Figure 2D; Fig. S2), likely related to their mild thorax cleft and shape/size defects (consistent with role(s) in tissue growth and cell behavior [15]). Overall, the cleft and shape phenotypes associated with ds/ft LOF or GOF are not altered in chas LOF conditions, nor is the chas LOF phenotype (Figure 2D–F; Fig. S2 for details), suggesting that chas and the Fat/Ds-system act independently.
chascon preserves PCP and shape of the notum epithelium by modulating the mechanical properties of the tendon cells
chas LOF does not disturb asymmetric localizations of Fz/PCP-components, but still influences coordinated cell orientations in the notum. In chas LOF bristle and socket cells reorient polarity towards the midline between 30–32hAPF (Figure 3A–C; Movies S1–2), and epithelia displayed local cellular A/P contractions at the level of anterior dorsocentral macrochaetae (Figure 3A′–B′). This suggested that chas modulates the epithelial behavior at this stage to maintain PCP.
Most of trichome-producing cells of the notum differentiate as “tendon cells”, serving as attachment sites for indirect flight muscles (IFMs) (Figure S3) [5]. These cells form domains defined by stripe expression, which promotes tendon fate [8, 16]. IFMs start to shorten after 20hAPF, generating mechanical strain at attachment sites (Figure S3) [8]. This is evident in dumpy (dp) mutants, where notum epithelia are pulled inwards, resulting in epidermal indentations similar to chas mutants (Figure S3) [17, 18]. Dp, a transmembrane cuticular protein maintains the tension at muscle attachment sites by providing an anchor for cells to attach to the exoskeleton or modulating the cuticular matrix composition [18]. Double homozygous chas1;dpov1 animals showed stronger indentations and cell orientation defects than individual mutants (Figure S3), suggesting that chas is required to modulate mechanical properties of epidermal tendon cells during IFM shortening.
By 30hAPF chas expression was detected (via chasNP0733G4 driven CD8-GFP staining; Figure S1) in tendon cells and was absent from socket and bristle cells (Figure S3). This was consistent with the chas LOF phenotype domains, supporting our genetic data that chas affects bristle polarity non-autonomously.
Subcellularly, Myc-tagged Chas localized at the apical cortex of tendon cells, colocalizing with E-Cadherin at adherent junctions, in tendon cell processes, and colocalizing with βPS-integrin at myotendinous junctions (Figure S3), consistent with a role of Chas linking the myotendinous junction and apical cortex.
Next, we monitored tendon cell processes and IFMs of live pupae expressing chasABiR and CD8-RFP under pnrG4 and constitutively a GFP-Moesin fragment fusion (sGMCA) [19]. Anterior indentations were detected by 27–28hAPF and very obvious by 32hAPF, coinciding with attachment domains of ventral dorso-longitudinal muscles (DLMs), which are highly contracted at this stage (Figure 3D,G; Figure S3). Accordingly, the strongest bristle orientation defects in chasABiR, coincided with attachments of dorsal DLMs (Figure 3E,H). Tendon cell processes connecting DLMs in chasABiR did not elongate at 28–32hAPF, in contrast to wild-type, suggesting that tendons with reduced Chas levels respond differently to pulling stimuli (Figure S3). At 34–35hAPF, many cells formed multiple trichomes and oriented towards the midline (Figure 3F,I). This demonstrated that chas LOF defects arise during IFM shortening at DLM attachment domains and associate with elongation defects of epidermal tendon cells. The epithelial contraction of pnrG4>chasABiR/ubi-DE-cadh-GFP (Figure 3A–A′) coincided with posterior edges of the most dorsal DLM attachment domains, suggesting that pulling forces generated by muscle shortening alter the shape of these cells.
To confirm that IFMs were causing the cellular strain and defects in chas LOF cells, we eliminated the strain by ablating IFMs genetically via expressing activated Notch (Nintra) in muscle progenitors [20,21]. In this background, cellular orientation of y,chas1 clones was almost completely rescued/suppressed (Figure 3J–K″). These data suggest that in tendons Chas balances pulling forces generated by IFM shortening to maintain shape and PCP of the notal epithelium.
The epidermal indentations in chas LOF arise at attachment sites of medial and ventral DLMs (Figure 3D), which form more perpendicular angles with the epithelial plane than dorsal DLMs [5]. This characteristic and our time-lapse studies suggested that the planar component of pulling forces transmitted through oblique attachments of dorsal DLMs impact directionally on the epithelial plane inducing a change of cellular orientation. The mechanical force, not compensated in chas mutant cells, is transmitted laterally, influencing mechanically the re-orientation of neighboring wild-type cells.
Of note, trichomes still localize to posterior cell edges in chas LOF, consistent with Fz/PCP-signaling still determining the position of trichome formation. When interfering with both, Fz/PCP-signaling and chas, the mechanical stress influences polarity stronger, leading to cellular orientation inverted anteriorly (Figure 2; Figure S2).
chascon acts through jitterbug/filamin and cooperates with zipper/MyosinII
To define chas function, we searched for genes displaying similar phenotypes within a genome-wide RNA-interference screen [22]. Knockdown of jitterbug (jbug) phenocopies all aspects of chas LOF (Figure 4A–B′). Co-expression of jbugiR and chasiR (under pnrGal4) showed an enhancement of polarity and indentation defects (Figure 4C–C′; Figure S4). Jbug, along with cheerio, encode the two Drosophila Filamin orthologs [6]. Filamins form homodimers that crosslink actin-filaments to confer mechanical stability to membranes [23]. They also work as molecular scaffolds linking transmembrane receptors with cytosolic signaling proteins and actin-filaments [23,24].
Whereas co-expression of chasABiR and jbugiR resulted in stronger defects than each dsRNAs separately (Figure 4C–C′; Figure S4), co-expression of wild-type JbugL isoform with chasABiR rescued chas LOF phenotypes (Figure 4D–D′; Figure S4). In contrast, Chas overexpression did not rescue jbugiR (not shown), suggesting that jbug/Filamin acts downstream of chas. Molecularly, Chas and Jbug proteins co-immunoprecipitated (Figure 4E), and co-localized with actin-filaments in S2R+ cells (not shown) and in tendon cells (Figure 4F), suggesting that they participate in a molecular complex associated with actin-filaments. These data suggest that chas acts through jbug to maintain shape and PCP of the notum.
Drosophila embryonic tendon cells contain prominent arrays of F-actin and MyosinII (MyoII), connecting the apical cortex with myotendinous junctions and maintaining the integrity of tendon cells upon stretching [25]. Rheological experiments have shown that actin-networks containing FilaminA display enhanced elasticity [26]. Accordingly, chas and jbug could modulate elastic properties of tendon cells, by regulating MyoII activity through small GTPases, its localization, or contributing in parallel to the formation and/or behavior of apico-basal F-actin networks.
We thus next analyzed localization of Zipper (Zip), Drosophila MyoII, and Shortstop (Shot), a Plakin that organizes apico-basal MT-networks in embryonic tendons [27]. Zip colocalizes partially with F-actin and Shot at tendon processes (Figure 4G). chasABiR did not disturb Zip or Shot localization/levels, suggesting that it is not required for F-actin/MyoII arrays or MT/Shot networks (Figure S4).
We knocked down Zip function at different pupal development stages via a dominant negative (DN-zip) under pnrGal4 and tubGal80ts [28] (to bypass its cytokinesis role [29]). DN-zip expression from 0hAPF resulted in bristle orientation defects and epidermal indentations (Figure 4H; Figure S4). DN-zip or chasABiR expression at 14hAPF (18°C) resulted in weak orientation defects (Figure 4I,J; Figure S4). Strikingly, co-expression of chasABiR and DN-zip from 14hAPF caused strong PCP phenotypes and epidermal indentations (Figure 4K). chas LOF phenotypes were not caused by diminished Zip activity, as expression of constitutively active Drosophila myosin regulatory light chain/MRLC (SqhE20E21) [30] did not rescue chasABiR-associated defects (not shown). This suggests that (1) zip/MyoII and chas-jbug/filamin cooperate to confer tendon cells with the ability to adapt to pulling forces generated by IFM shortening, and (2) the levels/activity of Filamin and MyoII regulate visco-elastic properties of actin-networks that run from myotendinous junctions to the apical cortex or at the apical cortex.
Conclusions
The notum epithelium develops in tight association with IFMs [5]. IFMs are directly attached to epithelial “tendon cells” and generate a pulling force over these cells [31] during PCP establishment. Mechanical properties of tendon cells and their interaction with muscles and the cuticle need to be finely tuned to maintain their shape and polarity [17, 18]. Chas localizes from myotendinous junctions to the apical cortex and is upregulated during their maturation. Its function is likely to regulate Filamin activity/or localization to adjust elastic properties of tendon cells during IFM shortening. Since diminished MyoII activity mimics jbug or chas LOFs and tendon process length of chasABiR is not altered, we favor a role of Chas/Filamin in regulating elastic properties of F-actin arrays over length adaptation through active polymerization.
Mutations in Filamins are associated with human diseases, causing neuronal migration defects, bone and cartilage malformations, myopathies, and vascular defects, among others [23,24]. The role of Filamin in organogenesis/disease progression is in part related to its structural role modulating the visco-elastic properties of actin-filaments [24]. Our observations contribute to the understanding of the role(s) of Filamins as regulators of visco-elastic cellular properties during inter-tissue interactions. How does Chas modulate Filamin function? Since Chas does not present any catalytic domains, we favor the idea that it acts as an adaptor for Filamin. Thus, lack of chas may affect the composition/architecture of tendon actin-networks organized by Filamin.
In conclusion, we propose that zip/MyoII, chas and jbug/filamin have complementary roles in the apico-basal mechanical properties of tendon cells, influencing cytoskeletal dynamics at the apical cortex. Thus alterations in the ability to adjust to tensile forces operating in the apico-basal direction disrupt the epithelial shape, shift the site of trichome formation, their number per cell and their planar orientation. Our data reveal that interactions of two tissues and the ability of cells to adapt mechanically to them during morphogenesis are fundamental to maintain the shape and PCP of an epithelium.
Experimental procedures
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Hugo Bellen, Jose de Celis, Seth Blair, Kenneth Prehoda, Daniel Kiehart, Liqun Luo, Cristina Molnar, David Strutt, Talila Volk, Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, VDRC, NIG-Fly, Exelixis/Harvard and the Bloomington center for flies and reagents; Sophy Okello, Joyce Lau, Ashok Ilankovan, Jaskirat Singh and Susana Franks for technical support; and David del Alamo, William Gault, Michel Gho, Ursula Weber, and Jun Wu for advice and discussion. This work was supported by NIH grant GM62917 to M.M., and ICM grant P06-039 to A.G. P.O. is a recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Pew Latin American Fellows Program.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Gho M, Schweisguth F. Frizzled signalling controls orientation of asymmetric sense organ precursor cell divisions in Drosophila. Nature. 1998;393:178–181. doi: 10.1038/30265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krasnow RE, Adler PN. A single frizzled protein has a dual function in tissue polarity. Development. 1994;120:1883–1893. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.7.1883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bellaiche Y, Beaudoin-Massiani O, Stuttem I, Schweisguth F. The planar cell polarity protein Strabismus promotes Pins anterior localization during asymmetric division of sensory organ precursor cells in Drosophila. Development. 2004;131:469–478. doi: 10.1242/dev.00928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lu B, Usui T, Uemura T, Jan L, Jan YN. Flamingo controls the planar polarity of sensory bristles and asymmetric division of sensory organ precursors in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 1999;9:1247–1250. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80505-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bate M. The mesoderm and its derivatives. In: Bate M, Martinez Arias A, editors. The development of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. pp. 1059–1078. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brown NH, Gregory SL, Martin-Bermudo MD. Integrins as mediators of morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2000;223:1–16. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lawrence PA, Struhl G, Casal J. Planar cell polarity: one or two pathways? Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:555–563. doi: 10.1038/nrg2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sandstrom DJ, Restifo LL. Epidermal tendon cells require Broad Complex function for correct attachment of the indirect flight muscles in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 22):4051–4065. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.22.4051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Molnar C, Lopez-Varea A, Hernandez R, de Celis JF. A gain-of-function screen identifying genes required for vein formation in the Drosophila melanogaster wing. Genetics. 2006;174:1635–1659. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.061283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Seifert JR, Mlodzik M. Frizzled/PCP signalling: a conserved mechanism regulating cell polarity and directed motility. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:126–138. doi: 10.1038/nrg2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parks AL, Cook KR, Belvin M, Dompe NA, Fawcett R, Huppert K, Tan LR, Winter CG, Bogart KP, Deal JE, et al. Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nat Genet. 2004;36:288–292. doi: 10.1038/ng1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:251–254. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01791-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gho M, Bellaiche Y, Schweisguth F. Revisiting the Drosophila microchaete lineage: a novel intrinsically asymmetric cell division generates a glial cell. Development. 1999;126:3573–3584. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.16.3573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Casal J, Lawrence PA, Struhl G. Two separate molecular systems, Dachsous/Fat and Starry night/Frizzled, act independently to confer planar cell polarity. Development. 2006;133:4561–4572. doi: 10.1242/dev.02641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aigouy B, Farhadifar R, Staple DB, Sagner A, Roper JC, Julicher F, Eaton S. Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila. Cell. 2010;142:773–786. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fernandes JJ, Celniker SE, VijayRaghavan K. Development of the indirect flight muscle attachment sites in Drosophila: role of the PS integrins and the stripe gene. Dev Biol. 1996;176:166–184. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Metcalfe JA. Developmental genetics of thoracic abnormalities of dumpy mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1970;65:627–654. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.4.627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilkin MB, Becker MN, Mulvey D, Phan I, Chao A, Cooper K, Chung HJ, Campbell ID, Baron M, MacIntyre R. Drosophila dumpy is a gigantic extracellular protein required to maintain tension at epidermal-cuticle attachment sites. Curr Biol. 2000;10:559–567. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00482-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kiehart DP, Galbraith CG, Edwards KA, Rickoll WL, Montague RA. Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:471–490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.2.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bernard F, Dutriaux A, Silber J, Lalouette A. Notch pathway repression by vestigial is required to promote indirect flight muscle differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 2006;295:164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Go MJ, Eastman DS, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Cell proliferation control by Notch signaling in Drosophila development. Development. 1998;125:2031–2040. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.11.2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mummery-Widmer JL, Yamazaki M, Stoeger T, Novatchkova M, Bhalerao S, Chen D, Dietzl G, Dickson BJ, Knoblich JA. Genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in Drosophila by transgenic RNAi. Nature. 2009;458:987–992. doi: 10.1038/nature07936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stossel TP, Condeelis J, Cooley L, Hartwig JH, Noegel A, Schleicher M, Shapiro SS. Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:138–145. doi: 10.1038/35052082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou AX, Hartwig JH, Akyurek LM. Filamins in cell signaling, transcription and organ development. Trends Cell Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alves-Silva J, Hahn I, Huber O, Mende M, Reissaus A, Prokop A. Prominent actin fiber arrays in Drosophila tendon cells represent architectural elements different from stress fibers. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:4287–4297. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-02-0182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gardel ML, Nakamura F, Hartwig J, Crocker JC, Stossel TP, Weitz DA. Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96:088102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.088102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Subramanian A, Prokop A, Yamamoto M, Sugimura K, Uemura T, Betschinger J, Knoblich JA, Volk T. Shortstop recruits EB1/APC1 and promotes microtubule assembly at the muscle-tendon junction. Curr Biol. 2003;13:1086–1095. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00416-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Franke JD, Montague RA, Kiehart DP. Nonmuscle myosin II generates forces that transmit tension and drive contraction in multiple tissues during dorsal closure. Curr Biol. 2005;15:2208–2221. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murthy K, Wadsworth P. Myosin-II-dependent localization and dynamics of F-actin during cytokinesis. Curr Biol. 2005;15:724–731. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Winter CG, Wang B, Ballew A, Royou A, Karess R, Axelrod JD, Luo L. Drosophila Rho-associated kinase (Drok) links Frizzled-mediated planar cell polarity signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Cell. 2001;105:81–91. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sandstrom DJ, Bayer CA, Fristrom JW, Restifo LL. Broad-complex transcription factors regulate thoracic muscle attachment in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 1997;181:168–185. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.