Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae has two type II DNA-topoisomerases (DNA-gyrase and DNA topoisomerase IV) and a single type I enzyme (DNA-topoisomerase I, TopA), as demonstrated here. Although fluoroquinolones target type II enzymes, antibiotics efficiently targeting TopA have not yet been reported. Eighteen alkaloids (seven aporphine and 11 phenanthrenes) were semisynthesized from boldine and used to test inhibition both of TopA activity and of cell growth. Two phenanthrenes (seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine) effectively inhibited both TopA activity and cell growth at equivalent concentrations (∼17 μm). Evidence for in vivo TopA targeting by seconeolitsine was provided by the protection of growth inhibition in a S. pneumoniae culture in which the enzyme was overproduced. Additionally, hypernegative supercoiling was observed in an internal plasmid after drug treatment. Furthermore, a model of pneumococcal TopA was made based on the crystal structure of Escherichia coli TopA. Docking calculations indicated strong interactions of the alkaloids with the nucleotide-binding site in the closed protein conformation, which correlated with their inhibitory effect. Finally, although seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine inhibited TopA and bacterial growth, they did not affect human cell viability. Therefore, these new alkaloids can be envisaged as new therapeutic candidates for the treatment of S. pneumoniae infections resistant to other antibiotics.
Keywords: Antibiotics, DNA Topoisomerase, DNA Topology, Drug Resistance, Protein-DNA Interaction
Introduction
Antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens is a serious clinical problem. This problem affects Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus), which, in addition to being one of the principal human pathogens, is the main ethyological agent of community-acquired pneumonia. Annually, approximately one million children aged <5 years die of pneumococcal pneumonia, meningitis, and/or sepsis worldwide (1). Resistance to currently used antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of pneumococcal infections, including β-lactams and macrolides, has spread worldwide in the last two decades (2). The new fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, which act on type II DNA topoisomerases, are therapeutic alternatives for treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (3). However, although resistance to fluoroquinolones in S. pneumoniae is still lower than 3% (4), an increase in resistance is likely to occur.
DNA topoisomerases participate in almost all cellular functions involving DNA transactions (5). They solve the topological problems associated with DNA replication, transcription, and recombination. In addition, these enzymes fine-tune the steady-state level of DNA supercoiling, both facilitating protein interactions with the DNA and preventing excessive supercoiling that is deleterious. In bacteria, the homeostasis of DNA supercoiling is maintained by the opposing activities of topoisomerases that relax DNA and gyrase that introduces negative supercoils. The transcriptional response to DNA relaxation involves genes coding for all the DNA topoisomerases from S. pneumoniae: topoisomerase I, topoisomerase IV, and DNA gyrase. Relaxation of DNA triggers the transcriptional up-regulation of gyrase and the down-regulation of topoisomerase I and topoisomerase IV (6).
The enzymatic activity of topoisomerases involves DNA cleavage and the formation of a transient phosphodiester bond between a catalytic tyrosine residue in the protein and one of the ends of the broken strand. DNA topology is modified during the lifetime of the covalent intermediate, and the enzyme is released as the DNA is religated. Topoisomerases are classified into two types based on their DNA cleavage pattern: type I enzymes that only cleave one DNA strand and type II enzymes that cleave both strands. The type II topoisomerases are tetrameric proteins formed by two different subunits: GyrA2GyrB2 for gyrase and ParC2ParE2 for topoisomerase IV. Fluoroquinolones inhibit type II enzymes and mainly affect chromosome replication. They also stabilize a reaction intermediate in which the enzymes are covalently linked to the DNA originating double-stranded breaks that lead to cell death (7). Genetic and biochemical studies have shown that in Gram-positive bacteria, including S. pneumoniae, topoisomerase IV is the primary target for most fluoroquinolones, and gyrase is a secondary target (8, 9). The type I enzymes are classified as either subfamily type IA if the protein links to the 5′ phosphate or subfamily type IB when the protein attaches to the 3′ phosphate. There is extensive sequence similarity among members of the same subfamily (10) but almost no sequence or structural similarity between the two subfamilies (11, 12). All bacterial type I topoisomerases are type IA enzymes. The overall structure of Escherichia coli topoisomerase I presents four domains with the active site located at the intersection of domains I and III where the catalytic Tyr-319 residue is placed (13). The proposed mechanism of action involves the opening of the enzyme through a large conformational change that separates domains II and III from the rest of the protein (14). A nucleotide-binding site has been identified in E. coli at the interface of domains I, III, and IV. This nucleotide-binding site, the only one formed by residues from the three domains in the closed conformation, has been proposed to bind the region of the 3′-OH end of the cleaved DNA strand (14).
Cheng et al. (15) have recently described one phenanthrene alkaloid able to inhibit the relaxation activity of E. coli topoisomerase I. However, no significant inhibition in cell growth was observed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic potential of targeting pneumococcal topoisomerase I. For this purpose new alkaloid inhibitors of its enzymatic activity have been developed and tested for their effects on DNA supercoiling. Furthermore, their effect on cell growth was also evaluated.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Bacterial Strains, Growth, and Transformation of Bacteria
S. pneumoniae was grown in a casein hydrolysate-based medium with 0.3% sucrose as an energy source (AGCH medium) and transformed with chromosomal or plasmid DNA as described previously (16). Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs)2 were determined in the same medium by the microdilution method according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (17). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of drug without visible growth.
Structures of N-Metilseconeolitsine and Seconeolitsine
The structural elucidation of compounds 16 (N-metilseconeolitsine) and 17 (seconeolitsine) were determined by 1H and 13C NMR using one-dimensional and two-dimensional (homonuclear COSY, heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence, and heteronuclear multiple bond connectivity) experiments in conjunction with mass spectral analysis and UV spectrum. The parameters were: seconeolitsine: C19H17NO4; mp 111–113 °C; UV (MeOH): λmax (log ϵ) = 262 (0.40), 289 (0.12), 325 (0.07) nm; 1H-RMN (Me2SO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.32 (3H, s, N-CH3), 2.76 (2H, m, CH2α), 3.14 (2H, m, CH2β), 6.16 (2H, s, OCH2O-6,7), 6.24 (2H, s, OCH2O-3,4), 7.22 (1H, s, H-2), 7.40 (1H, s, H-8), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, H-9), 7.81 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, H-10), 8.39 (1H, s, H-5); 13C-RMN (Me2SO-d6) δ (ppm): 32.88 (CH2β), 35.75 (NCH3), 52.73 (CH2α), 100.93 (OCH2O, C-3,4), 101.48 (OCH2O, C-6,7), 104.37 (C-5), 105.19 (C-8), 110.29 (C-2), 116.28 (C-4a), 121.31 (C-10), 123.44 (C-5a), 124.32 (C-9), 125.01 (C-10a), 128.15 (C-8a), 131.33 (C-1), 140.64 (C-4), 144.03 (C-3), 147.03* (C-7) 147.10* (C-6); EI-MS m/z (relative intensity) = 323 (10), 280 (100), 279 (32), 221 (2), 163 (14); and N-Metilseconeolitsine: C20H19NO4; mp 132–134 °C; UV (MeOH): λmax (log ϵ) = 262 (0.40), 289 (0.12), 325 (0.07) nm; 1H-RMN (Me2SO-d6) δ (ppm): 2.22 (6H, s, N-(CH3)2), 2.49 (2H, m, CH2α), 3.12 (2H, m, CH2β), 6.17 (2H, s, OCH2O-6,7), 6.25 (2H, s, OCH2O-3,4), 7.25 (1H, s, H-2), 7.41 (1H, s, H-8), 7.57 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, H-9), 7.75 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz, H-10), 8.39 (1H, s, H-5); 13C-RMN (Me2SO-d6) δ (ppm): 30.79 (CH2β), 45.10 (N(CH3)2), 60.51 (CH2α), 100.94 (OCH2O, C-3,4), 101.48 (OCH2O, C-6,7), 104.39 (C-5), 105.19 (C-8), 110.29 (C-2), 116.28 (C-4a), 121.15 (C-10), 123.47 (C-5a), 124.40 (C-9), 124.90 (C-10a), 128.12 (C-8a), 131.50 (C-1), 140.60 (C-4), 144.05 (C-3), 146.80 (C-6) 146.80 (C-7); EI-MS m/z (int. rel.) = 337 (100), 279 (63), 221 (5), 191 (5), 163 (58).
Cloning and Expression of topA in E. coli
The topA gene was amplified by PCR with 0.1 μg of chromosomal DNA from S. pneumoniae R6 and 1 μm (each) synthetic oligonucleotide primers. The oligonucleotides used were topAUP2 (5′-GTGGCTACGGCAACAAAAAAGAA-3′) and topADOWN (5′-cgcgcgcatgcTTATTTAATCTTTTCTTCCTC-3′). The 5′ end of topADOWN contained a sequence including a PaeI restriction site (lowercase letters), topAUP2 included the GTG initiation codon, and topADOWN included the sequence complementary to the TAA stop codon (underlined). Amplification was achieved with an initial cycle of 2 min of denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min of annealing at 55 °C, and 2.5 min of polymerase extension with Pfu high fidelity polymerase (Fermentas) at 72 °C and then 30 cycles of 2 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, and 2.5 min at 72 °C with slow cooling at 10 °C. The oligonucleotides were removed (QIAquick PCR purification kit; Qiagen), cut with PaeI, cloned into plasmid pQE1 digested with PaeI and PvuII, and established in E. coli M15 (pREP4) (Qiagen). Sequencing with oligonucleotides pQE-seq3 (5′-AGCTAGCTTGGATTCTCACC-3′) and pQE-seq5 (5′-GAGGCCCTTTCGTCTTCA-3′) was performed to confirm the cloning. The pQE1 vector/M15(pREP4) host cloning system permits the hyperproduction of His6-tagged recombinant proteins encoded by genes placed under the control of a phage T5 promoter and two lac operator sequences. The host strain contains the low copy plasmid pREP4, which constitutively expresses the LacI repressor. Expression of recombinant proteins encoded by pQE vectors was induced by the addition of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG), which binds to the LacI protein and inactivates it. This inactivation allows the RNA polymerase of the host cell to transcribe the sequences downstream from the T5 promoter. A culture of E. coli M15 (pREP4)/pQE-SPNtopA was grown at 37 °C in LB medium containing 250 μg/ml of ampicilin (to select pQE1) and 25 μg/ml kanamycin (to select pREP4) to A620 = 0.6. IPTG (1 mm) was added, and incubation was continued for 30 min. The cells were collected by centrifugation, lysed at 4 °C for 30 min in buffer A (50 mm NaH2PO4, pH 8, 300 mm NaCl, 10 mm imidazol) and lisozyme (1 mg/ml), and sonicated for 5 min (10 times for 30 s, with 1 min cooling between each sonication) in a Sonifier B-12 (Branson Co.). Debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min, and the resulting supernatant was dialyzed overnight against buffer A. The TopA protein was purified by affinity chromatography in a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Qiagen) column following manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the column (1 ml) was washed with 10 ml of buffer A, and the bound proteins were eluted with 10 ml of buffer containing imidazol at 60, 100, and 200 mm. Fractions of 2 ml were collected and analyzed by SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Fractions containing a protein of the expected size were dialyzed against buffer B (20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 50 mm KCl, 1 mm DTT, 50% glycerol). The purified protein was conserved at −20 °C. In these conditions, TopA remains active for at least 12 months.
Cloning of topA under the Control of Pmal in S. pneumoniae
The topA gene was amplified by PCR from strain R6 as described above except that primer topAUP4 (5′-cgcgctctagaAGGTGTGATACTATGGCT-3′) was used instead of topAUP2. The 5′ end of topAUP4 contained a sequence including an XbaI restriction site (lowercase letters) and included an ATG initiation codon (underlined). The amplified fragment was cut with PaeI + XbaI, cloned into plasmid pLS1RGFP (18) digested with the same enzymes, and established in strain R6. Transformed bacteria were selected in AGCH containing erythromycin (1 μg/ml). Recombinant plasmids were identified by digestion with HindIII + EcoRI and confirmed by sequencing with oligonucleotides pLS1rF (5′-GAGTATACTTATAAGTAACGCAAAC-3′) and pLS1rR (5′-TAGGTTGAGGCCGTTGAGCACC-3′).
Relaxation of pBR322 by TopA and Human TOPO1
Reactions were carried out in 15 or 100 μl containing 0.5 μg of supercoiled plasmid pBR322 in 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mm KCl, 10 mm MgCl2, 1 mm DTT, 50 μg of BSA/ml. After 1 h of incubation at 37 °C in the presence on TopA, the reaction was terminated by 2 min of incubation at 37 °C with 50 mm EDTA and 1 h at 37 °C with 1% SDS, 100 μg/ml proteinase K. Treatment with human TOPO1 (Inspiralis, Norwich, UK) was performed with the buffer and conditions recommended by the supplier. When required, the samples were ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in H2O. The reaction products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gels run at 18 V for 20 h. Treatment with the alkaloids was performed by preincubation of TopA or TOPO1 for 10 min at 4 °C in a final volume of 15 μl. DNA quantification of agarose gels was done by scanning densitometry after electrophoresis and EtBr staining. Quantification of TopA activity was calculated by gel densitometry using the Quantity One program (Bio-Rad). To calculate activity, the amount of the covalently closed negatively supercoiled (CCC) form was determined and divided by the total amount of DNA in each well. IC50 (mean of at least three independent determinations) was defined as the concentration of drug required for a 50% reduction of enzymatic activity.
Analysis of the Topology of Covalently Closed Circles
Circular DNA molecules were analyzed in neutral/neutral two-dimensional agarose gels. The first dimension was run at 1.5 V/cm in a 0.4% agarose (Seakem; FMC Bioproducts) gel in 1× Tris borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer for 17–19 h at room temperature. The second dimension was run at 7.5 V/cm in 1% agarose gel in 1× TBE buffer for 7–9 h at 4 °C. Chloroquine (Sigma) was added to the TBE buffer in both the agarose and the running buffer. After electrophoresis gels were subjected to Southern hybridization. Two probes were used on two-dimensional agarose gels transferred to nylon membrane (Inmobylon NY+; Millipore). For the analysis of the supercoiling level in pLS1 in vivo, a 240-bp PCR fragment obtained from pLS1 as described (6) was used. For the analysis of the enzymatic activity of TopA, pBR322 plasmid was digested with EcoRI + EcoRV, and the ends were filled with biotinylated dNTPs by the Klenow polymerase fragment (Fermentas) and used as a probe. Chemiluminiscent detection of DNA was performed with the Phototope®-Star kit (New England Biolabs). Images were captured in a VersaDoc MP400 system and analyzed with the Quantity One program (Bio-Rad).
Cytofluorometric Analysis of Neutrophil Apoptosis and Survival
Human peripheral blood neutrophils were obtained from buffy coats of healthy donors by Ficoll Hypaque density gradient centrifugation, as described previously (19). Freshly isolated neutrophils were resuspended in supplemented RPMI medium at 2 × 106 cells/ml. Twenty-five μl were cultured in a 96-well plate containing 200 μl of supplemented RPMI medium for 24 h in the absence or presence of compounds 16 and 17. Assessment of apoptosis was performed by flow cytometry using annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI). The protocol indicated by the manufacturer (Annexin-V-Fluos; Roche Applied Science) was used as outlined previously (20). Cells (1 × 104) were analyzed in a Beckman Coulter Epics XL (Fullerton, CA) and differentiated as early or viable apoptotic (annexin V+ and PI−), late apoptotic and/or necrotic (annexin V+ and PI+), and viable nonapoptotic (annexin V− and PI−) cells.
EtBr Displacement Assay
A total of 6 μg (300 μl) of calf thymus DNA was diluted to 3 ml with buffer (20 mm NaCl, 2 mm HEPES, 10 μm EDTA, pH 7.4). Prior to analysis, 3 μl of EtBr (0.5 mg/ml) were added and allowed to equilibrate for 1 min. Aliquots of alkaloids were then added, and the fluorescence was measured on an Cary Eclipse Varian fluoresce spectrophotometer after 1 min of equilibration, using excitation and emission wavelengths of 546 and 660 nm, respectively.
Molecular Modeling of Topoisomerase I from S. pneumoniae
The model was built on the basis of the crystal structure of E. coli topoisomerase I (Protein Data Bank code 1CY1). Amino acid changes along the entire sequence were performed using the O program (21), running in a Silicon Graphics work station. Side chain rotamers were chosen from a database of more common conformers. The overall fold of the model was energy-minimized using the minimizer algorithm implemented in the CNS package (22). The stereo chemical quality of the model was checked with the PROCHECK program (23).
Three-dimensional Structures of Alkaloid Ligands and Molecular Docking
Boldine, secoboldine, seconeolitsine, and N-methyl-seconeolitsine were used in the docking calculations. The three-dimensional structures of boldine and secoboldine were obtained from the Cambridge Structural Database with reference codes HIHXUR and OLIDES, respectively. The three-dimensional structures of seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine were modeled on the basis of the crystallographic structures of boldine and secoboldine by using the Dundee PRODRG2 Server (24). Stereochemistry of ligands was checked with the Mercury program (25). Molecular docking was carried out using GOLD (Genetic Optimization for Ligand Docking) software (26), which uses the genetic algorithm (GA). This method allows a partial flexibility of protein and full flexibility of the ligand. The cavity was defined from to 10 Å around Ser-487, giving freedom of movement to Asp-101, Arg-102, Arg-156, Arg-300, Arg-485, Asp-543, and Glu-546 in side chain rotamers. For each of the 25 independent GA runs, a maximum number of 100,000 GA operations were performed on a set of five groups with a population size of 100 individuals. Default cut-off values of 2.5 Å (dH-X) for hydrogen bonds and 4.0 Å for van der Waals distance were employed. When the top three solutions attained RMSD values within 1.5 Å, GA docking was terminated. The RMSD values for the docking calculations are based on the RMSD matrix of the ranked solutions. We observed that the best ranked solutions were always among the first 10 GA runs, and the conformation of molecules based on the best fitness score was further analyzed.
RESULTS
Characterization of the DNA Topoisomerase I of S. pneumoniae
We performed a BLAST search for DNA topoisomerases coding sequences in the S. pneumoniae R6 genome (27) and found that, in addition to the genes coding the two type II enzymes (gyrase and topoisomerase IV), gene topA (spr1141) encodes an homologue of bacterial topoisomerase I. The topoisomerase I enzymes from E. coli and S. pneumoniae show 46.9% similarity on the whole sequence and 62% in the cleavage/strand passage module (Fig. 1A). The topA gene was amplified by PCR from R6 chromosomal DNA with specific oligonucleotides and cloned into the E. coli plasmid pQE-1 rendering pQE-SPNtopA, which carries the Met-His6-Gln-TopA fusion protein under the control of the T5 promoter. This plasmid was established into E. coli M15 (pREP4), and its T5 promoter was induced by IPTG. The recombinant plasmid overproduced a protein with apparent molecular mass of 84 kDa and an apparent purity of 98% (Fig. 1B), which is in agreement with the expected size of the fusion protein (79.37 kDa for TopA + 5.23 kDa for the N-terminal fusion). The total yield of purification was 0.8 mg of purified TopA per liter of culture, with a concentration of 80 μg/ml and a specific relaxation activity (see below) of 2.4 × 104 units/mg.
To test DNA relaxation activity of TopA, the CCC pBR322 plasmid (1.77 nm) was incubated in the presence of different amounts of the purified enzyme, and the reaction products were analyzed in mono-dimensional agarose as described (28, 29). TopA activity converted the CCC plasmid in topoisomers with different degrees of supercoiling that were observed as discrete bands when the gel was run in the absence of EtBr (Fig. 2A). However, all of the relaxed topoisomers migrated as a single band when the gel was run in the presence of saturating concentrations of EtBr (Fig. 2B). A unit of TopA enzymatic activity was defined as the amount of enzyme being able to relax 50% of the CCC substrate in 1 h at 37 °C and corresponded to 42 ng (5 nm) of the purified enzyme. As observed in other bacterial topoisomerase I enzymes, the pneumococcal TopA did not relax positively supercoiled DNA (Fig. 2C). This was shown by the absence of activity on CCC pBR322 treated with EtBr (Fig. 2C, lane +EtBr), which, at the high concentration used, introduces positive supercoiling. The activity was partially recovered when the intercalating agent was removed with isoamyl alcohol (Fig. 2C, lane ±EtBr). An additional method to examine pBR322 topoisomer distribution after TopA treatment was two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of chloroquine (30). This technique, which differs from the classical two-dimensional chloroquine gels, makes it possible to separate DNA molecules by mass and shape. In the two-dimensional gel, topoisomers appeared distributed in the autoradiograms in a bubble-shaped arc, negative supercoiled molecules were located on the right side, and positive supercoiled ones were located on the left (Fig. 2, D and E). In the absence of enzyme, 100% of the topoisomers had negative supercoiling (Fig. 2D). In the presence of 1 unit (5 mm) of enzyme, 56.8 and 43.2% were negative and positive supercoiled topoisomers, respectively. In the presence of 3 units (15 mm) of TopA, these figures were 16.8 and 83.2% for negative and positive supercoiled topoisomers, respectively (Fig. 2D).
Inhibition of TopA Activity by Aporphine and Phenanthrene Alkaloids
A total of 18 compounds (six aporphine and 12 phenanthrene alkaloids; supplemental Fig. S1) semisynthesized from the natural alkaloid boldine (Ref. 31 and data not shown) were selected to test inhibition of growth and inhibition of S. pneumoniae TopA activity. As shown in Table 1, previously characterized clinical isolates (4), either susceptible or resistant to various antibiotics (including fluoroquinolone resistant), were tested. The alkaloids showed equivalent activities against all isolates, independently of their antibiotic resistance, suggesting the absence of cross-resistance. Two phenanthrene alkaloids, with numbered compounds 16 and 17 (Fig. 3), showed the greatest inhibition of growth. The structural elucidation of these compounds was carried out as described under “Experimental Procedures.”
TABLE 1.
Strains | Resistance patterna | MICb |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 17 | 23 | ||
μm | ||||||||||||||
R6 | S | 500 | 500 | >250 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 16 | 16 | 62 |
ATCC 6303 | S | 1000 | 1000 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 16 | 16 | 125 |
CipS8 | S | 500 | 500 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 16 | 16 | 62 |
CipS9 | S | 1000 | 1000 | >250 | 1000 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 16 | 16 | 125 |
CipR20 | PTCEClSxTCip | 1000 | 500 | >250 | 250 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 8 | 16 | 125 |
CipR16 | PSxTCip | 1000 | 1000 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 500 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 125 | 16 | 16 | 62 |
CipR8 | PSxTCip | 500 | 500 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 62 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 8 | 8 | 125 |
CipR42 | PTEClCip | 1000 | 1000 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 8 | 8 | 125 |
CipR45 | TEClCip | 500 | 500 | >250 | 1000 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 8 | 16 | 125 |
CipR68 | Cip | 500 | 500 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 8 | 8 | 125 |
CipR5 | EClCip | 500 | 500 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 16 | 16 | 62 |
CipR15 | SxTCip | 1000 | 1000 | >250 | 500 | >250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 500 | 62 | 16 | 8 | 62 |
a S, susceptible to all antibiotics tested; P, resistant to penicillin (MICs of 0.12–4 μg/ml); T, resistant to tetracycline (MICs ≥4 μg/ml); C, resistant to chloramphenicol (MIC ≥ 8 μg/ml); E, resistant to erythromycin (MIC ≥ 0.5 μg/ml); Cl, resistant to clindamycine (MIC ≥ 1 μg/ml); Cip, resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml), SxT, resistant to cotrimoxazole (MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml for trimethoprim and MIC ≥ 76 μg/ml for sulfamethoxazole).
b MICs for compounds B (boldine), 10, 19, 20, 21, and 22 were 1000 μm in all cases. The chemical structures of the compounds used are showed in supplemental Fig. S1.
The in vitro inhibition of TopA relaxation activity was tested with the 18 compounds using 1 unit of enzyme, i.e. the amount of enzyme yielding 50% of activity. Under these conditions, TopA relaxation activity was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner, with IC50 values (average ± S.D.) of 559 ± 72.0 (n = 3) for secoboldine (compound 2), 58.2 ± 3.0 (n = 3) for neolitsine (compound 14), 17 ± 0.4 (n = 5) for N-methyl-seconeolitsine (compound 16), and 17 ± 0.4 μm (n = 4) for seconeolitsine (compound 17) (Fig. 4, A and B). A good correlation (r2 = 0.96) between the inhibition of TopA activity and the inhibition of cell growth was observed for these compounds. These results imply that topoisomerase I is indeed the in vivo target of the compounds assayed. The inhibition by the alkaloids was enhanced by preincubation of the enzyme with the drug. Lower inhibition was observed when preincubation was avoided (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that the alkaloid would interact with the enzyme at the DNA-binding site (see below).
Some inhibition of the relaxation activity over pBR322 was observed for compounds 2 and 5 at concentrations ≥100 μm (Fig. 4A). However, no inhibition for boldine (Fig. 4A) and the rest of the compounds (data not shown) was observed at concentrations ≤500 μm. The inhibition of TopA was tested with EtBr, a typical DNA intercalant compound. A pattern compatible with the intercalation of EtBr into the CCC pBR322 form was observed (Fig. 4C). In addition, preincubation did not change the observed pattern. These results suggest that TopA was not inhibited by EtBr.
Human topoisomerase I, a prototype IB topoisomerase, was tested in relaxation assays with compounds 16 (N-metilseconeolitsine) and 17 (seconeolitsine) (Fig. 5A). Activation was observed at low concentrations and partial inhibition at 50 μm, a concentration at which the pneumococcal TopA showed full inhibition (data not shown). These effects on topoisomerase I could be attributed to the intercalation of compounds 16 and 17 in the DNA. As showed in Fig. 5B, both compounds displace EtBr from calf thymus DNA. At 50% displacement, the ratio alkaloid/EtBr was 2.5 (compound 16) and 2.8 (compound 17).
Targeting of TopA in Vivo by Seconeolitsine
To assess whether TopA is the in vivo target of the alkaloids, different attempts were made to obtain mutants resistant to these compounds. Approximately 1.2 × 1010 cells were plated on agar plates containing 1 to 8 × MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) of seconeolitsine, and no resistant bacteria were obtained. Therefore, to establish that the primary cellular target for the phenanthrene alkaloids was indeed topoisomerase I, the topA gene was cloned under the control of the Pmal promoter into plasmid pLS1R, yielding plasmid pLS1R-topA. The activity of this promoter was induced by maltose (18). The effect of the drug was tested in the wild type strain R6 (seconeolitsine MIC = 16 μg/ml) carrying either pLS1R or pLS1R-topA plasmids, at drug concentrations ranging from 0.25× to 1× MIC. These results show that cell growth (Fig. 6A) and division (Fig. 6B) were affected in a drug concentration-dependent manner. The growth of R6 carrying either of these plasmids showed similar kinetics in the absence or presence of seconeolitsine at 1× MIC the drug (Fig. 6). In contrast, differences in both growth inhibition and viability were observed at 0.25 × MIC and 0.5 × MIC, where inhibition by seconeolitsine was attenuated by the induction of TopA in plasmid pLS1R-topA (Fig. 6).
Further evidence of the in vivo inhibition of TopA by seconeolitsine was obtained from the analysis of topoisomers distribution of the internal plasmid pLS1 by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis, a suitable approach for studying supercoiling levels (6). This technique allows separation of DNA molecules by mass and shape. First, the pLS1 linking number (ΔLk) was quantified using two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis with 15 μg/ml chloroquine in the second dimension. Under these conditions, the induced ΔLk of monomers was −31. Treatment with compound 16 at 0.5× MIC and 1× MIC resulted in a time-dependent increase of plasmid supercoiling (Fig. 7). At 0.5× MIC, supercoiling densities (σ) were −0.059, −0.086, and −0.093 at 0, 5, and 30 min after drug addition, respectively, indicating that plasmids became hypernegatively supercoiled. Similar results were obtained after treatment at 1 × MIC, where supercoiling densities were −0.093 and −0.100 at 5 and 30 min, respectively. Although direct extrapolation from the observations made in small plasmids is not completely equivalent to the bacterial chromosome, our results indicate that supercoiling significantly increases in the presence of seconeolitsine and support that TopA is its in vivo target.
Modeling of S. pneumoniae TopA and Docking with Alkaloids
We have observed a 46.9% sequence similarity between topoisomerase I enzymes from E. coli and S. pneumoniae (Fig. 1A). Therefore, a structural model of the pneumococcal TopA was performed based on the structure of the E. coli enzyme. The model shows that residues forming the active site are mainly conserved between E. coli and S. pneumoniae. The catalytic Tyr-319 of E. coli corresponds to Tyr-314 of S. pneumoniae (Fig. 8A). The nucleotide-binding site (binding of the 3′-OH end of the cleaved DNA strand) has been identified in E. coli at the interface of domains I, III, and IV (14). The equivalent site in S. pneumoniae TopA presents a strong salt bridge interaction network at both sides of the cavity. This network is formed by residues Arg-485, Asp-543, Arg-102, and Glu-546 on one side and Glu-103, Arg-316, and Asp-101 on the other side (Fig. 7C). All of these residues are also found in E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus except for Asp-546, which is an Ala residue in E. coli and S. aureus.
Furthermore, drug recognition by the pneumococcal TopA enzyme was modeled by docking using the GOLD program with boldine, secoboldine, seconeolitsine, and N-methyl-seconeolitsine (Fig. 3 and supplemental Fig. S2). All of these ligands are placed in a similar orientation, stacked between Pro-486 and Arg-102 in the nucleotide-binding site (supplemental Fig. S2), as observed for the E. coli topoisomerase I in complex with nucleotide (13). Among all of the tested ligands, N-methyl-seconeolitsine displays more interactions with the protein than the remaining alkaloids (Fig. 8C and supplemental Fig. S2). The larger number of interactions for phenanthrene alkaloids (secoboldine, seconeolitsine, N-methyl-seconeolitsine) compared with those with aporphine skeleton (boldine), can be explained by the presence of a third benzylic ring. This extra ring may further stabilize the structures through both cation-π interaction with Arg-102 and a stacking interaction with Pro-486. Interestingly, Arg-102, which is critical for the cation-π interaction with the ligand, is also stabilized by a double salt bridge interaction with Asp-543 and Glu-546 (the last one unique to S. pneumoniae). Moreover, oxygen atoms from methylenedioxy groups are establishing polar contacts with Glu-103, Arg-156, and Asp-543. Furthermore, additional polar interaction can be predicted between the secondary amine group of N-methyl-seconeolitsine and Glu-546. Taking into account all of these data, the large salt bridge network in S. pneumoniae TopA results in a rigid and narrow cavity in which N-methyl-seconeolitsine is strongly stabilized through both the interactions with different protein residues and by a perfect fitting in the cavity (Fig. 8B).
Effect of Seconeolitsine and N-Methyl-seconeolitsine in Human Cell Viability
At the two concentrations assayed (30 and 100 μm), neither N-methyl-seconeolitsine nor seconeolitsine affected neutrophil apoptosis (Fig. 9). In contrast, seconeolitsine, at the highest concentration tested (100 μm), caused a small but significant decrease in neutrophil survival (Fig. 9). Nevertheless this concentration was nearly 5-fold higher than that necessary to exert antibiotic activity.
DISCUSSION
Two main approaches can be used for the discovery of new antibiotics. The first approach is based on the screening of natural products for bacteria growth inhibition followed by the subsequent identification of the cellular target. The second uses the knowledge of the structure of essential enzyme targets to design different compounds. In this study both approaches have been successfully used to identify new alkaloid antibiotics. We have characterized for the first time the topoisomerase I enzyme of S. pneumoniae and completed the characterization of the DNA topoisomerase complement of this pathogen. Topoisomerase I is the unique DNA topoisomerase of type I in this bacterium and has enzymatic features similar to those found in Gram-negative bacteria, being able to relax negatively supercoiled DNA but not positively supercoiled DNA (Fig. 2).
A previous study carried out by Tse-Dinh's group (15) evaluated the capability of different compounds to inhibit topoisomerase I enzymes of Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and Yersinia pestis). Among them, stephenanthrine (20–100 μm) was found to inhibit the relaxation activity of E. coli topoisomerase I via stabilization of the cleavage complex. However, this alkaloid did not affect bacterial growth at these concentrations, with MIC values of 60 and 100 μm for Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive organism) and E. coli, respectively. These findings led us to test the activity of various boldine-derived compounds presenting a chemical structure similar to stephenanthrine. Among them, N-methyl-seconeolitsine and seconeolitsine displayed the most potent inhibitory activity of bacterial growth at concentrations within the range required for inhibition of the relaxation activity of S. pneumoniae topoisomerase I (Fig. 4 and Table 1). Moreover, these compounds also inhibited the growth of S. pneumoniae clinical isolates resistant to other chemically unrelated antibiotics used to treat pneumococcal infections (Table 1), including fluoroquinolones that target type II topoisomerases.
Attempts to obtain mutants resistant to the alkaloids were unsuccessful. These results suggest that the alteration of the single topoisomerase of type IA in S. pneumoniae could be lethal, especially if the alteration would be at the DNA-binding site. In agreement, E. coli cells lacking their two type IA topoisomerases (TopA and TopB) are found to be nonviable (32).
Evidence for in vivo targeting of TopA by seconeolitsine was provided by the protection against growth inhibition when TopA was overproduced (Fig. 6). In fact, the increase in supercoiling of an internal plasmid in the presence of the alkaloid suggests an inhibition of TopA. This increase in supercoiling could be also caused by activation of gyrase or by inhibition of topoisomerase IV. However, these effects were not observed in the in vitro activities of purified pneumococcal gyrase and topoisomerase IV in the presence of N-methyl-seconeolitsine (data not shown). These results suggest that TopA is the intracellular target of compounds N-methyl-seconeolitsine and seconeolitsine and that these alkaloids might be useful in the treatment of infectious diseases caused by multidrug-resistant isolates. Although pharmacokinetic studies are required, our toxicological studies suggest that N-methyl-seconeolitsine and seconeolitsine (30 μm) did not affect human neutrophil viability (Fig. 8).
It has been proposed that the reaction cycle of topoisomerase I involves the opening and closing of the enzyme. For DNA to bind near the active site, the enzyme must adopt an open (or partially open) conformation (13). After the cleavage reaction takes place, the protein adopts an open conformation in which the protein forms a bridge between the two ends of the broken DNA strand. The opening of the enzyme would allow the entrance of another strand into the central hole. For the religation step to take place, the enzyme must bring the two ends of the broken strand together by bringing domains I and III together while keeping the passing strand inside the central hole of the enzyme. Clearly, different openings of the enzyme are required to display full activity. In this way, docking calculations with alkaloids indicate that they can be accommodated at the nucleotide-binding site of the closed conformation of topoisomerase I. In this site alkaloids are in close contact with domains I, III, and IV (Fig. 7 and supplemental Fig. S2) and establish strong interactions (cation-π, hydrophobic, and polar interactions) with residues of the nucleotide-binding site. Boldine presents a more flexible structure without the extended π cloud of the seconeolitsine or N-methyl-seconeolitsine, therefore preventing a strong stabilization through cation-π interaction, as predicted for seconeolitsine or N-methyl-seconeolitsine. These strong interactions together with the fine fitting observed between the nucleotide-binding site and the alkaloid should block the opening mechanism required for topoisomerase I to be fully active. Therefore, avoidance of DNA binding may explain the strong inhibitory effect observed for these ligands. In agreement with that hypothesis, the inhibitory effect exerted by these alkaloids was enhanced prior to DNA binding. Thus, alkaloid-topoisomerase interactions seem to occur at the initial steps (i.e. in the closed conformation) and very likely in simultaneous interaction with the different domains involved in the opening mechanism of the enzyme.
Low concentrations of seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine seemed to activate the in vitro relaxation activity of human TOPO1, a prototype IB topoisomerase. However, the in vitro intercalation of these compounds in the DNA (Fig. 5B) would suggest that the alterations of TOPO1 activity could be attributed to this intercalation. In agreement, a similar effect was observed when the relaxing activity of TopA was tested in the presence of EtBr (Fig. 5B).
Higher alkaloid concentrations seemed to inhibit the in vitro activity of human TOPO1 without inducing apoptosis in human cells. In contrast, camptothecin, a selective inhibitor of TOPO1 used as antitumor drug, induces apoptosis. It binds simultaneously both to the DNA and to topoisomerase I and stabilizes the cleavage complex formed by topoisomerase I-DNA and the drug. Then the collision of these cleavage complexes with replication forks induces double-stranded breaks that led to apoptosis (33). Therefore, it is likely either that alkaloid interaction with TOPO1 occurs before the single-stranded DNA cleavage is produced, because apoptosis was not detected, or that alkaloid did not interact with the enzyme.
In conclusion, in the present study we have isolated and purified a new antibiotic target from S. pneumoniae, topoisomerase I. Through the semi-synthesis of two new antibiotics, seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine, we have proven that topoisomerase I inhibition results in the blockade of bacteria growth without affecting the viability of human cells. These compounds did not cause any cytotoxic effect on human neutrophils at the concentrations required to exert antibiotic activity. Thus, seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine can be envisaged as two new therapeutic candidates for the treatment of S. pneumoniae infections resistant to other antibiotics and open a new scenario for designing more specific antibiotics targeting this pivotal enzyme.3
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Paloma Acebo, Mónica Amblar, and Pedro A. Lazo for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank M. Calero for help with the ethidium bromide displacement assays.
The work was supported by Comunidad de Madrid Grant CM-BIO0260-2006, COMBACT (to J. H. and A. G. C.); Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Grants BIO2008-02154 (to A. G. C.), BFU2008-01711 (to J. A. H.), and SAF2008-03477 (to M. J. S.); and Spanish Ministry of Health, Carlos III Health Institute Grants RIER, RD08/0075/0016 (to M. J. S.).
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1 and S2.
García, M. T., Blázquez, M. A., and de la Campa, A. G. (December 18, 2009) Use of Seconeolitsine and N-methyl-seconeolitsine for the Manufacture of Medical Products. Patent pending, P200931186.
- MIC
- minimal inhibitory concentration
- IPTG
- isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside
- PI
- propidium iodide
- GA
- genetic algorithm
- CCC
- covalently closed negatively supercoiled
- TOPO1
- topoisomerase I.
REFERENCES
- 1. World Health Organization (2007) Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 82, 93–104 17380597 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jacobs M. R., Felmingham D., Appelbaum P. C., Grüneberg R. N. the Alexander Project Group (2003) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 52, 229–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mandell L. A., Wunderink R. G., Anzueto A., Bartlett J. G., Campbell G. D., Dean N. C., Dowell S. F., File T. M., Jr., Musher D. M., Niederman M. S., Torres A., Whitney C. G. (2007) Clin. Infect. Dis. 44, (Suppl. 2) S27–S72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. de la Campa A. G., Ardanuy C., Balsalobre L., Pérez-Trallero E., Marimón J. M., Fenoll A., Liñares J. (2009) Emerg. Infect. Dis. 15, 905–911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Champoux J. J. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 369–413 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ferrándiz M. J., Martín-Galiano A. J., Schvartzman J. B., de la Campa A. G. (2010) Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3570–3581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Drlica K., Malik M., Kerns R. J., Zhao X. (2008) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 385–392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Muñoz R., de la Campa A. G. (1996) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2252–2257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Fernandez-Moreira E., Balas D., Gonzalez I., de la Campa A. G. (2000) Microb. Drug Resist. 6, 259–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Caron P. R., Wang J. C. (1994) Adv. Pharmacol. 29B, 271–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sharma A., Hanai R., Mondragón A. (1994) Structure 2, 767–777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yu L., Zhu C. X., Tse-Dinh Y. C., Fesik S. W. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 7622–7628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lima C. D., Wang J. C., Mondragón A. (1994) Nature 367, 138–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Feinberg H., Lima C. D., Mondragón A. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 918–922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cheng B., Liu I. F., Tse-Dinh Y. C. (2007) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 640–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lacks S. A., Lopez P., Greenberg B., Espinosa M. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 192, 753–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2004) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Approved Standard M100-S14, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nieto C., Fernández de Palencia P., López P., Espinosa M. (2000) Plasmid 43, 205–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Mateo T., Naim Abu Nabah Y., Losada M., Estellés R., Company C., Bedrina B., Cerdá-Nicolás J. M., Poole S., Jose P. J., Cortijo J., Morcillo E. J., Sanz M. J. (2007) Blood 110, 1895–1902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Martin M. C., Dransfield I., Haslett C., Rossi A. G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 45041–45050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Jones T. A., Zou J. Y., Cowan S. W., Kjeldgaard M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. A 47, 110–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Brünger A. T., Adams P. D., Clore G. M., DeLano W. L., Gros P., Grosse-Kunstleve R. W., Jiang J. S., Kuszewski J., Nilges M., Pannu N. S., Read R. J., Rice L. M., Simonson T., Warren G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905–921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Laskowski R. A., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 231, 1049–1067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schüttelkopf A. W., van Aalten D. M. (2004) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 1355–1363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Macrae C. F., Bruno I. J., Chisholm J. A., Edgington P. R., McCabe P., Pidcock E., Rodríguez-Monge L., Taylor R., van de Streek J., Wood P. A. (2008) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 466–470 [Google Scholar]
- 26. Verdonk M. L., Cole J. C., Hartshorn M. J., Murray C. W., Taylor R. D. (2003) Proteins 52, 609–623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hoskins J., Alborn W. E., Jr., Arnold J., Blaszczak L. C., Burgett S., DeHoff B. S., Estrem S. T., Fritz L., Fu D. J., Fuller W., Geringer C., Gilmour R., Glass J. S., Khoja H., Kraft A. R., Lagace R. E., LeBlanc D. J., Lee L. N., Lefkowitz E. J., Lu J., Matsushima P., McAhren S. M., McHenney M., McLeaster K., Mundy C. W., Nicas T. I., Norris F. H., O'Gara M., Peery R. B., Robertson G. T., Rockey P., Sun P. M., Winkler M. E., Yang Y., Young-Bellido M., Zhao G., Zook C. A., Baltz R. H., Jaskunas S. R., Rosteck P. R., Jr., Skatrud P. L., Glass J. I. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 5709–5717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Keller W. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2550–2554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Depew D. E., Wang J. C. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 4275–4279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Martín-Parras L., Lucas I., Martínez-Robles M. L., Hernández P., Krimer D. B., Hyrien O., Schvartzman J. B. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3424–3432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Milián L., Estellés R., Abarca B., Ballesteros R., Sanz M. J., Blázquez M. A. (2004) Chem. Pharm. Bull. 52, 696–699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Stupina V. A., Wang J. C. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 355–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Pommier Y. (2006) Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 789–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.