In her commentary, Einarson1 discusses a study by Nakhai-Pour and colleagues that found an increased rate of spontaneous abortion with antidepressant use in pregnancy.2 Einarson found similarly increased risks in a 2009 study of women who contacted teratology information centres.3 Despite this replication, she casts doubt on Nakhai-Pour and colleagues’ results, stating that “this study cannot make any definitive conclusion as to whether antidepressants increase the risk of spontaneous abortion,” and that “if there is a true increased risk of spontaneous abortion caused by gestational use of antidepressants, it is very small.”1
Einarson fails to mention a single strength of the study, such as the large population-based sample, prospective recording of filled prescriptions, and controls for potential confounders such as socioeconomic status, comorbidities and indicators of depression severity. She also raises doubts about statistical significance, citing an expected 5% false-positive rate and over 100 analyses. We counted 15 analyses; of these, 13 crude and 7 adjusted ORs were significant (p < 0.05). Thus, even with a 5% type I error, the association between antidepressant use and increased risk of spontaneous abortion appears robust.
The relation between antidepressants and spontaneous abortion meets many of Bradford-Hill’s epidemiologic criteria for causation, such as biologic plausibility, dose-response, temporal sequence and replication.
We disagree with Einarson’s characterization of the absolute risk increase of 2.8% (unadjusted) and relative increase of 1.68 (95% confidence interval 1.38–2.06) as “very small” and unconfirmed. Moreover, there is evidence linking antidepressants to cardiac defects, persistent pulmonary hypertension and a neonatal syndrome.4
Women facing depression in pregnancy need accurate and unbiased information on treatment efficacy. For mild to moderate major depression, efficacy of antidepressants differs little from that of placebo.5,6 Nondrug treatments such as psychotherapy do not have the same potential for harm; they should be offered first line.
References
- 1.Einarson A. Antidepressants and pregnancy: complexities of producing evidence-based information. CMAJ 2010;182:1017–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nakhai-Pour HR, Broy P, Berard A. Use of antidepressants during pregnacy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. CMAJ 2010;182:1031–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Einarson A, Choi J, Einarson TR, et al. Rates of spontaneous and therapeutic abortions following use of antidepressants in pregnancy: results from a large prospective database. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;31:452–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tuccori M, Testi A, Antonioli L, et al. Safety concerns associated with the use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other serotonergic/noradrenergic antidepressants during pregnancy: a review. Clin Ther 2009;31 Pt 1:1426–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med 2008;5:e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fournier JC, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, et al. Anti-depressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;303:47–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
