Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1987 Jul 24;15(14):5765–5774. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.14.5765

The anomalous gel migration of a stable cruciform: temperature and salt dependence, and some comparisons with curved DNA.

S Diekmann, D M Lilley
PMCID: PMC306021  PMID: 3039465

Abstract

We have made an analysis of the gel electrophoretic properties of a pseudo-cruciform fragment, a linear DNA molecule containing a stable cruciform. The migration of this construct was analysed in polyacrylamide gels at a various temperatures in the range 5 degrees to 55 degrees C, and in the presence of NaCl, MgCl2 or ethidium bromide. The magnitude of the anomalous migration (retardation) was almost temperature independent up to 40 degrees C, but decreased strongly beyond this point, extrapolating to normal migration at 70 degrees C. Addition of salts reduced the anomaly. This took the form of a continuous reduction in anomalous migration with the addition of NaCl up to 60 mM, while with MgCl2 there was a sharp reduction in the anomaly to a constant value which is reached by 10 mM. Under these conditions, moreover, the migration of the fragment became almost temperature-independent over the entire range. These results have been interpreted to reflect the influence of ion binding at the four-way junction on the relative disposition of the cruciform arms. The detailed electrophoretic properties of the pseudo-cruciform are in marked contrast to those of sequence-directed curved DNA fragments. In particular, the response to the addition of 1 microgram/ml ethidium bromide offers a convenient method for distinguishing between anomalous retardation arising from curvature (greatly reduced anomaly) or a cruciform junction (enhanced anomaly).

Full text

PDF
5765

Images in this article

5769Image
on p.5769

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carle G. F., Olson M. V. Separation of chromosomal DNA molecules from yeast by orthogonal-field-alternation gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jul 25;12(14):5647–5664. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.14.5647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diekmann S. Sequence specificity of curved DNA. FEBS Lett. 1986 Jan 20;195(1-2):53–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80128-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diekmann S. Temperature and salt dependence of the gel migration anomaly of curved DNA fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jan 12;15(1):247–265. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.1.247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diekmann S., Wang J. C. On the sequence determinants and flexibility of the kinetoplast DNA fragment with abnormal gel electrophoretic mobilities. J Mol Biol. 1985 Nov 5;186(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Furlong J. C., Lilley D. M. Highly selective chemical modification of cruciform loops by diethyl pyrocarbonate. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 May 27;14(10):3995–4007. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.10.3995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gellert M., Mizuuchi K., O'Dea M. H., Ohmori H., Tomizawa J. DNA gyrase and DNA supercoiling. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):35–40. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gough G. W., Lilley D. M. DNA bending induced by cruciform formation. Nature. 1985 Jan 10;313(5998):154–156. doi: 10.1038/313154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gough G. W., Sullivan K. M., Lilley D. M. The structure of cruciforms in supercoiled DNA: probing the single-stranded character of nucleotide bases with bisulphite. EMBO J. 1986 Jan;5(1):191–196. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04195.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hagerman P. J. Evidence for the existence of stable curvature of DNA in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4632–4636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hagerman P. J. Sequence-directed curvature of DNA. Nature. 1986 May 22;321(6068):449–450. doi: 10.1038/321449a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holbrook S. R., Sussman J. L., Warrant R. W., Church G. M., Kim S. H. RNA-ligant interactions. (I) Magnesium binding sites in yeast tRNAPhe. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Aug;4(8):2811–2820. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.8.2811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jack A., Ladner J. E., Rhodes D., Brown R. S., Klug A. A crystallographic study of metal-binding to yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA. J Mol Biol. 1977 Apr 15;111(3):315–328. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80054-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kemper B., Garabett M. Studies on T4-head maturation. 1. Purification and characterization of gene-49-controlled endonuclease. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Mar 16;115(1):123–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koo H. S., Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. DNA bending at adenine . thymine tracts. Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):501–506. doi: 10.1038/320501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lilley D. M., Kemper B. Cruciform-resolvase interactions in supercoiled DNA. Cell. 1984 Feb;36(2):413–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90234-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lilley D. M. The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6468–6472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lilley D. DNA structure. Bent molecules--how and why? Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):487–488. doi: 10.1038/320487a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marini J. C., Levene S. D., Crothers D. M., Englund P. T. Bent helical structure in kinetoplast DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(24):7664–7668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Messing J., Vieira J. A new pair of M13 vectors for selecting either DNA strand of double-digest restriction fragments. Gene. 1982 Oct;19(3):269–276. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(82)90016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mizuuchi K., Kemper B., Hays J., Weisberg R. A. T4 endonuclease VII cleaves holliday structures. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):357–365. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Quigley G. J., Teeter M. M., Rich A. Structural analysis of spermine and magnesium ion binding to yeast phenylalanine transfer RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):64–68. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Scholten P. M., Nordheim A. Diethyl pyrocarbonate: a chemical probe for DNA cruciforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 May 27;14(10):3981–3993. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.10.3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sullivan K. M., Lilley D. M. Influence of cation size and charge on the extrusion of a salt-dependent cruciform. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jan 20;193(2):397–404. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90227-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sutcliffe J. G. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):77–90. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Trifonov E. N. Curved DNA. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1985;19(2):89–106. doi: 10.3109/10409238509082540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Trifonov E. N., Sussman J. L. The pitch of chromatin DNA is reflected in its nucleotide sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):3816–3820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.3816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ulanovsky L. E., Trifonov E. N. Estimation of wedge components in curved DNA. Nature. 1987 Apr 16;326(6114):720–722. doi: 10.1038/326720a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Van der Ploeg L. H., Schwartz D. C., Cantor C. R., Borst P. Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma brucei analyzed by electrophoretic separation of chromosome-sized DNA molecules. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):77–84. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90302-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wemmer D. E., Wand A. J., Seeman N. C., Kallenbach N. R. NMR analysis of DNA junctions: imino proton NMR studies of individual arms and intact junction. Biochemistry. 1985 Oct 8;24(21):5745–5749. doi: 10.1021/bi00342a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu H. M., Crothers D. M. The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending. Nature. 1984 Apr 5;308(5959):509–513. doi: 10.1038/308509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES