Abstract
We report a new reaction-based approach for the detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging (13C MRI) and the H2O2-mediated oxidation of α-ketoacids to carboxylic acids. 13C-benzoylformic acid (13C-BFA) reacts selectively with H2O2 over other reactive oxygen species (ROS) to generate 13C-benzoic acid (BA) and can be hyperpolarized using dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), providing a method for dual-frequency detection of H2O2. Phantom images collected using frequency-specific imaging sequences demonstrate the efficacy of this responsive contrast agent to monitor H2O2 at pre-clinical field strengths. The combination of reaction-based detection chemistry and hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging (13C MRI) provides a potentially powerful new methodology for non-invasive multianalyte imaging in living systems.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are intimately involved in the genesis and progression of numerous ailments1 ranging from cancer2 to neurodegeneration3 to diabetes.4 The relative stability and diffusibility of H2O2 poise this ROS to act as a potential diagnostic marker for the presence and progression of a wide range of pathological states. Indeed, the measurement of H2O2 in exhaled breath condensates has been used as a clinical marker for illnesses associated with lung inflammation,5 including asthma,6 chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases,7 and cystic fibrosis.8 The clinical use of this direct marker for oxidative stress and inflammation in deep tissues is hampered in large part by a lack of methods to non-invasively detect H2O2 in thicker, non-transparent specimens.9 As part of a larger program in our laboratory to develop novel ways to study the chemistry and biology of H2O2 in living cells and animals by molecular imaging,10 we now introduce a new type of reaction-based hyperpolarized 13C MRI contrast agent for the detection of H2O2.
MRI offers a promising approach for precise non-invasive molecular imaging of deep tissues in real time. However, its full potential as an imaging modality has yet to be realized because of a low sensitivity11 that restricts most MRI experiments to imaging highly abundant endogenous protons in water and lipids. To overcome this limitation, hyperpolarization methods12 such as optical pumping,13 para-H2 induced polarization,14 and dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)15 can drastically enhance an MRI signal by manipulating spin states to produce samples with large non-equilibrium spin populations, leading to highly magnetized samples and signal enhancements approaching 105-fold. The development of rapid dissolution procedures16 following DNP has allowed the use of hyperpolarized [1-13C]-pyruvate,17 [2-13C]-fructose,18 [5-13C]-glutamine,19 13C-HCO3,20 [1,4-13C2]-fumarate,21 15N-choline,22 alone and in combination23 as metabolic probes.24 These hyperpolarized probes ultimately report on the flux of specific enzymes by monitoring the conversion of isotopically labeled natural substrates to their metabolic products. On the other hand, our interest in the detection of molecular species such as H2O2, which can simultaneously originate from multiple cellular sources, requires the use of probes that are not prone to rapid metabolism so as to avoid false positives. In addition to being metabolically inert and non-toxic, an ideal 13C MRI probe of this type should also possess favorable physical properties for DNP, produce an observable chemical shift upon rapid and selective reaction with the analyte of interest, and provide a system where both reactants and products have 13C-labeled nuclei with long spin-lattice relaxation (T1) times.
To this end, observations of the rapid oxidative decarboxylations of α-ketoacids25 led us to investigate these species as hyperpolarizable 13C MRI contrast agents using a reaction-based scheme for H2O2 detection. Initial studies focused on benzoylformic acid (BFA) because this α-ketoacid is non-toxic and undergoes minimal metabolism in both cells26 and animals.27 Kinetics measurements reveal that the reaction between BFA and H2O2 proceeds rapidly to produce benzoic acid (BA) within minutes with a second order rate constant of 10.31 ± 0.26 M−1 min−1 (Figure S1). Moreover, the 13C ketone nucleus of BFA and the 13C carbonyl nucleus of BA are expected to have long T1 values (on the order of tens of seconds) and the chemical shift difference between this carbon atom upon conversion of BFA to BA, the product of oxidative decarboxylation, is ca. 20 ppm. Encouraged by these initial findings, we synthesized BFA with a 13C-label on the ketone carbon (13C-BFA) using sulfur ylide acylation and oxidation chemistry (Scheme 1). Reaction of neat bromoacetonitrile with tetrahydrothiophene provided the cyanosulfonium bromide 1. The cyanosulfur ylide formed in situ was then coupled with 13C-benzoic acid (13C-BA) using HATU to yield the 13C-cyanosulfur ylide 2. Finally, Oxone oxidation afforded 13C-BFA after HPLC purification.
Scheme 1.
Design of a hyperpolarized 13C MRI contrast agent for detection of H2O2 through H2O2-mediated α-ketoacid oxidative decarboxylation and the synthesis of 13C-BFA and its H2O2-mediated conversion to 13C-BA.
With this compound in hand, we proceeded to test its ability to undergo DNP under clinically relevant conditions. In these standard protocols, DNP results from the transfer of polarization from a stable organic radical species to a spin S = 1/2 nucleus by microwave irradiation at 1–2 K in a solid-state glass.15 Efficient transfer of polarization from the free radical to the nuclei of interest relies heavily on the formation of a uniform glass which is typically achieved with highly concentrated solutions; for biological use, water is an appropriate solvent so that no residual toxic organic solvents are present after rapid-dissolution of the hyperpolarized sample. We found that 13C-BFA is extremely soluble in water at concentrations >5 M, with solutions reproducibly forming a glassy solid upon flash-freezing in liquid N2. Representative preparations utilize 6.0 M solutions of 13C-BFA and 15 mM OX063 radical in water and were hyperpolarized at 1.33 K and irradiating at 94.094 GHz using a Hypersense™ (Oxford Instruments). Under these unoptimized conditions, 13C-BFA polarizes with a build-up time constant of 899 s, providing 5.2% polarization and a ~5500-fold signal enhancement. The T1 values of the labeled 13C2 ketone were measured to be 24.4 ± 0.4 s at 11.7T and 18.6 ± 0.3 s at 14.1T (Figure S3).
We then evaluated hyperpolarized samples of 13C-BFA for spectroscopic detection of H2O2 (Figure 1). After hyperpolarization, the sample was rapidly dissolved in 100 mM phosphate buffered to pH 7.8 with 0.3 mM EDTA to a final concentration of 5 mM and reacted with various concentrations of H2O2. Spectra were acquired with a single scan in the presence of H2O2 concentrations ranging from 10 to 1000 µM. Figure 1a shows a set of spectra 21 s after rapid dissolution and reaction with H2O2. The labeled carboxylate 13C1 resonance of the 13C-BA product exhibits a chemical shift of 176 ppm and the unlabeled carboxylate C1 carbon of the starting 13C-BFA appears as a doublet at 173.5 ppm; the ratio of the integrated 13C-BA peak to the unlabeled 13C-BFA peak displayed a maximum at 21 s and a good linear correlation with increasing concentrations of H2O2 (Figure 1b), indicating that hyperpolarized 13C-BFA can readily detect concentrations of H2O2 at high micromolar levels in vitro that are within the range implicated in states of oxidative stress that lead to cellular senescence,28 despite trace amounts of 13C-benzoic acid (<0.1%) produced during synthetic manipulation and rapid dissolution procedures that can reduce the accuracy of such measurements. Although we were able to detect these levels of H2O2 using this first-generation probe, ongoing efforts are geared toward improving sensitivity to lower physiological levels that might be encountered in vivo through newer probes and optimized hyperpolarization protocols.
Figure 1.
(a) 13C NMR spectra of hyperpolarized 13C-BFA after 21 s of reaction with 10, 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 µM H2O2 at 11.7T. Spectra were acquired with a single scan every 3 s with a 5° pulse, except for 10 and 100 µM which were acquired after 21 s with a 90° pulse. (b) Linear correlation of the ratio of integrated peak intensities of the C1 (carboxylate carbon) of 13C-BA to the C1 (carboxylate carbon) of 13C-BFA versus the concentration of H2O2; R2 = 0.988.
The oxidative decarboxylation of BFA is relatively selective for H2O2 over other biologically relevant ROS as monitored using analytical HPLC. After reacting BFA for 20 min at room temperature, only samples treated with H2O2 show significant conversion to benzoic acid (Figure 2). Only upon addition of exceedingly high, non-physiological concentrations does OCl− or ONOO− (500 mM) show reactivity with BFA (Figure S2), producing 20% and 70% NMR conversions, respectively. We speculate that the selectivity for H2O2 over OCl− arises from an increased nucleophilicity of the former, whereas the selectivity over ONOO− is most likely due to the short lifetime of the latter under physiological conditions.29
Figure 2.
Response of 50 µM BFA to various ROS. All ROS were added at 5 mM, except for O2− which was generated enzymatically at a rate of 24 µmol/min for 120 min (2.9 mM total). Concentrations of benzoic acid were measured by HPLC after 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min of reaction except for O2− which was measured after 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of reaction.
Finally, we established the ability of 13C-BFA to image H2O2 at pre-clinical field strengths. Specifically, we attained phantom images using a 14.1T micro-imager equipped with 100 G/cm gradients and millipede 1H and quadrature birdcage 13C.RF coils. Figure 3 displays phantoms of samples containing 20 mM hyperpolarized 13C-BFA with 0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mM added H2O2, thermally polarized 5 M 13C-BA in dimethyl acetamide (DMA), and thermally polarized 13C-BFA in H2O. First, we acquired 1H spin echo images of all the tubes to indicate tube placement (Figure 3a). Next, we acquired 13C MRI images using frequency-specific excitation pulses to obtain images of thermally polarized 13C-BA in DMA (Figure 3b), thermally polarized 13C-BFA in H2O (Figure 3c), hyperpolarized 13C-BA produced from the H2O2-mediated conversion of hyperpolarized 13C-BFA in 100 mM phosphate buffer, 0.3 mM EDTA at pH 7.8 (Figure 3d), and hyperpolarized 13C-BFA in 100 mM phosphate buffer, 0.3 mM EDTA at pH 7.8 (Figure 3e). DMA was necessary to dissolve the thermally polarized 5 M 13C-BA due to its low aqueous solubility, and an unbuffered system was used for the thermally polarized 5 M 13C-BFA, causing a 2–3 ppm change in the chemical shifts for these species and requiring adjustment of the corresponding frequency specific pulses for these images. 13C images were acquired using a frequency specific 90° pulse and GRASE type readout for each resonance.30 The overall acquisition time for the 13C images was ~150 ms, revealing the dramatic reduction in acquisition time gained by using hyperpolarized probes. Moreover, the thermally polarized 5 M phantoms in Figures 3b and 3c are scaled by 10-fold compared to the hyperpolarized 20 mM phantoms in Figures 3d and 3e, indicating the marked signal enhancement for the hyperpolarized samples of several orders of magnitude. A clear increase in the intensity of the 13C-BA images with a concomitant decrease in 13C-BFA signals can be observed with increasing H2O2 concentrations, demonstrating the power of using rapid and selective reaction-based hyperpolarizable probes to image H2O2 levels via 13C MRI.
Figure 3.
Phantom images of 5 M thermally polarized 13C-BFA in H2O, 5 M thermally polarized 13C-BA in DMA, and 20 mM hyperpolarized 13C-BFA in 100 mM phosphate, 0.3 mM EDTA buffered at pH 7.8 with 0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mM H2O2. (a) 1H spin echo image. (b) Frequency specific image with selective excitation of the resonance of 5 M 13C-BA in DMA. (c) Frequency specific image with selective excitation of the resonance of 5 M 13C-BFA in H2O. (d) Frequency specific image with selective excitation of the resonance of 13C-BA buffered at pH 7.8 (e) Frequency specific image with selective excitation of the resonance of 13C-BFA buffered at pH 7.8. Images in (b)–(e) were acquired after ~37 s of reaction with H2O2 with a TR = 150 ms, FOV 40 × 40 × 40 mm, 16 × 12 × 12 matrix and zerofilled to a final resolution of 1.25 mm isotropic.
In summary, we have described a hyperpolarized reaction-based 13C MRI probe strategy for the selective detection and imaging of H2O2. This work expands the applications of hyperpolarized 13C MRI for imaging non-enzymatic species by utilizing non-endogenous and biocompatible hyperpolarized probes. This first-generation 13C-BFA probe is a viable candidate for detecting H2O2 at oxidative stress levels, and we are currently developing H2O2 probes with increased sensitivity, as well as expanding the scope of other 13C-labeled compounds as de novo MRI contrast agents.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This work has been supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM 79465), Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, and the Packard and Sloan Foundations. C. J. C. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Hikari Yoshihara, Mr. Martin Ipuy, and Mr. Bertram Koelsch for experimental assistance.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Synthetic and experimental details (PDF), including procedures for the synthesis of compounds, selectivity assays, polarization procedures, spectroscopy, and imaging. This material is available free of charge at UUhttp://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.(a) Rhee SG. Science. 2006;312:1882–1883. doi: 10.1126/science.1130481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Stone JR, Yang S. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006;8:243–270. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Miller EW, Chang CJ. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007;11:620–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Winterbourn CC. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008;4:278–286. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Poole LB, Nelson KJ. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 2008;12:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Paulsen CE, Carroll KS. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010;5:47–62. doi: 10.1021/cb900258z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Fruehauf JP, Meyskens FL., Jr Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:789–794. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Finkel T, Serrano M, Blasco MA. Nature. 2007;448:767–774. doi: 10.1038/nature05985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ishikawa K, Takenaga K, Akimoto M, Koshikawa N, Yamaguchi A, Imanishi H, Nakada K, Honma Y, Hayashi J. Science. 2008;320:661–664. doi: 10.1126/science.1156906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Mattson MP. Nature. 2004;430:631–639. doi: 10.1038/nature02621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lin MT, Beal MF. Nature. 2006;443:787–795. doi: 10.1038/nature05292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) DiMauro S, Schon EA. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;31:91–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Houstis N, Rosen ED, Lander ES. Nature. 2006;440:944–948. doi: 10.1038/nature04634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pop-Busui R, Sima A, Stevens M. Diabetes-Metab. Res. Rev. 2006;22:257–273. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Jay D, Hitomi H, Griendling KK. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2006;40:183–192. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Halliwell B, Whiteman M. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;142:231–255. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Emelyanov A, Fedoseev G, Abulimity A, Rudinski K, Fedoulov A, Karabanov A, Barnes PJ. Chest. 2001;120:1136–1139. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.4.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mercken EM, Hageman GJ, Schols AM, Akkermans MA, Bast A, Wouters EF. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;172:994–1001. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200411-1580OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Robroeks CMHHT, Rosias PPR, van Vliet D, Jöbsis Q, Yntema J-BL, Brackel HJL, Damoiseaux GMC, den Hartog GM, Wodzig WKWH, Dompeling E. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2008;19:652–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.(a) Lee D, Khaja S, Velasquez-Castano JC, Dasari M, Sun C, Petros J, Taylor WR, Murthy N. Nature Mater. 2007;6:765–769. doi: 10.1038/nmat1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Van de Bittner GC, Dubikovskaya EA, Bertozzi CR, Chang CJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:21316–21321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012864107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Chang MCY, Pralle A, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:15392–15393. doi: 10.1021/ja0441716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Miller EW, Albers AE, Pralle A, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:16652–16659. doi: 10.1021/ja054474f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Albers AE, Okreglak VS, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9640–9641. doi: 10.1021/ja063308k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Miller EW, Bian SX, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:3458–3459. doi: 10.1021/ja0668973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Miller EW, Tulyathan O, Isacoff EY, Chang CJ. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:263–267. doi: 10.1038/nchembio871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Srikun D, Miller EW, Domaille DW, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:4596–4597. doi: 10.1021/ja711480f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:9638–9639. doi: 10.1021/ja802355u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Albers AE, Dickinson BC, Miller EW, Chang CJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18:5948–5950. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Srikun D, Albers AE, Nam CI, Iavarone AT, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:4455–4465. doi: 10.1021/ja100117u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Dickinson BC, Huynh C, Chang CJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:5906–5915. doi: 10.1021/ja1014103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Miller EW, Dickinson BC, Chang CJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:15681–15686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005776107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Lippert AR, Gschneidtner T, Chang CJ. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:7510–7512. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01560a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Dickinson BC, Peltier J, Stone D, Schaffer DV, Chang CJ. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:106–112. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Terreno E, Castelli DD, Viale A, Aime S. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:3019–3042. doi: 10.1021/cr100025t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.(a) Viale A, Aime S. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010;14:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Taratula O, Dmochowski IJ. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010;14:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Spence MM, Rubin SM, Dimitrov IE, Ruiz EJ, Wemmer DE, Pines A, Yao SQ, Tian F, Schultz PG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:10654–10657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191368398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Spence MM, Ruiz EJ, Rubin SM, Lowery TJ, Winssinger N, Schultz PG, Wemmer DE, Pines A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:15287–15294. doi: 10.1021/ja0483037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wei Q, Seward GK, Hill PA, Patton B, Dimitrov IE, Kuzma NN, Dmochowski IJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:13274–13283. doi: 10.1021/ja0640501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lowery TJ, Garcia S, Chavez L, Ruiz EJ, Wu T, Brotin T, Dutasta J-P, King DS, Schultz PG, Pines A, Wemmer DE. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:65–73. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Schröder L, Lowery TJ, Hilty C, Wemmer DE, Pines A. Science. 2006;314:446–449. doi: 10.1126/science.1131847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.(a) Bowers CR, Weitekamp DP. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986;57:2645–2648. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Bowers CR, Weitekamp DP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:5541–5542. [Google Scholar]; (c) Golman K, Axelsson O, Jóhannesson H, Månsson S, Olofsson C, Petersson JS. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001;46:1–5. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Bhattacharya P, Chekmenev EY, Perman WH, Harris KC, Lin AP, Norton VA, Tan CT, Ross BD, Weitekamp DP. J. Magn. Reson. 2007;186:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Reineri F, Viale A, Giovenzana G, Santelia D, Dastru W, Gobetto R, Aime S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:15047–15053. doi: 10.1021/ja8059733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Reineri F, Santelia D, Viale A, Cerutti E, Poggi L, Tichy T, Premkumar SSD, Gobetto R, Aime S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:7186–7193. doi: 10.1021/ja101399q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Borghini M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1968;20:419–421. [Google Scholar]; (b) Abragam A, Goldman M. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1978;41:395–463. [Google Scholar]; (c) Comment A, Van Den Brandt B, Uffman K, Kurdzesau F, Jannin S, Konter JA, Hautle P, Wenckebach WT, Gruetter R, Van Der Klink JJ. Concepts Magn. Reson., Part B. 2007;31B:255–269. [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Ardenkjaer-Larson JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Golman K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10158–10163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Golman K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Petersson S, Mansson I, Leunbach I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10435–10439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733836100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.(a) Golman K, in ’t Zandt R, Thaning M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:11270–11275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601319103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Golman K, in’t Zandt R, Lerche M, Pehrson R, Ardenkjaer-Larson JH. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10855–10859. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kohler SJ, Yen Y, Wolber J, Chen AP, Albers MJ, Bok R, Zhang V, Tropp J, Nelson S, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J, Hurd RE. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;58:65–69. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Zierhut ML, Zhang VY, Kohler SJ, Tropp J, Hurd RE, Yen Y-F, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8607–8610. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Marjańska M, Iltis I, Shestov AA, Deelchand DK, Nelson C, Uğurbil K, Henry P-G. J. Magn. Reson. 2010;206:210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Keshari KR, Wilson DM, Chen AP, Bok R, Larson PEZ, Hu S, Criekinge MV, Macdonald JM, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;106:5503–5507. doi: 10.1021/ja9049355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Lerche M, Brindle KM. Mag. Res. Med. 2008;60:253–257. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu D-E, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, in ’t Zandt R, Jensen PR, Karlsson M, Golman K, Lerche MH, Brindle KM. Nature. 2008;453:940–943. doi: 10.1038/nature07017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Hu D-E, Jensen PR, in ’t Zandt R, Karlsson M, Gisselsson A, Nelson SK, Witney TH, Bihndiek SE, Hansson G, Peitersen T, Lerche MH, Brindle KM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:19801–19806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911447106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sarkar R, Comment A, Vasos PR, Jannin S, Gruetter R, Bodenhausen G, Hall H, Kirik D, Denisov VP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:16014–16015. doi: 10.1021/ja9021304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wilson DM, Keshari KR, Larson PEZ, Chen AP, Hu S, Criekinge MV, Bok R, Nelson SJ, Macdonald JM, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. J. Magn. Reson. 2010;205:141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.For an example of a non-endogenous hyperpolarized 89Y complex used as a pH probe, see: Jindal AK, Merritt ME, Suh EH, Malloy CR, Sherry AD, Kovács Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1784–1785. doi: 10.1021/ja910278e.
- 25.Ju L, Lippert AR, Bode JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:4253–4255. doi: 10.1021/ja800053t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang J-Z, Lu X-Y, Zhao N-P, Cheng Y-Y. Zeng, S. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2007;21:497–501. doi: 10.1002/bmc.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.(a) Amin YM, Nagwekar JB. J. Pharm. Sci. 1975;64:1804–1812. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600641112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Amin YM, Nagwekar JB. J. Pharm. Sci. 1975;64:1813–1818. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600641113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Amin YM, Nagwekar JB. J. Pharm. Sci. 1976;65:1341–1345. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600650920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Giorgio M, Trinei M, Miglaccio E, Pelicci PG. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007;8:722–728. doi: 10.1038/nrm2240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.For the preparation of ONOO−, see: Uppu RM. Anal. Biochem. 2006;354:165–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.11.003. ; Ferrer-Sueta G, Radi R. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009;4:161–177. doi: 10.1021/cb800279q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oshio K, Feinberg DA. Magn. Res. Med. 1991;20:344–349. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910200219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.