Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Feb 23;133(11):3828–3831. doi: 10.1021/ja200368y

Nickel Hydrides Supported by a Non-Innocent Diphosphine Arene Pincer: Mechanistic Studies of Nickel-Arene H-Migration and Partial Arene Hydrogenation

Sibo Lin 1, Michael W Day 1, Theodor Agapie 1,*
PMCID: PMC3060299  NIHMSID: NIHMS275958  PMID: 21344904

Abstract

Nickel hydrides supported by a terphenyl diphosphine were synthesized and found to undergo nickel-to-arene H-transfers. Some of the resulting complexes also undergo the reverse (C-to-Ni) H-migration indicating the potential for storing H-equivalents in this type of pincer ligand. NMR spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray diffraction, and isotopic labeling studies investigating the mechanism of these processes are discussed.


Metal hydrides are intermediates in a wide variety of catalytic transformations. Improved understanding of the parameters that affect hydride reactivity is of interest in developing effective catalysts for proton reduction, CO2 reduction, hydrosilylation, hydroboration, heterocycle activation, arene reduction and olefin hydrogenation and isomerization.118 Furthermore, molecular designs for shuttling of hydrogen equivalents are of importance in biological transformations such as dioxygen activation and reduction. A diphosphine-arene pincer ligand was recently reported to support mononuclear and dinuclear nickel complexes that exhibit strong nickel-arene interactions.19,20 These complexes provide access to a new class of nickel hydrides supported by arene π-interactions. We report on the reactivity of these species and a series of H-migration processes relevant to arene hydrogenation and to potential storage of H-equivalents in the ligand backbone.

Treatment of Ni(0) diphosphine 1 with one equivalent of HCl/Et2O (Scheme 1) generates a new species that displays a triplet at −29.0 ppm (JPH = 79 Hz) in the 1H NMR spectrum and a doublet in the 31P NMR spectrum, consistent with formation of a nickel hydride complex with two equivalent phosphines.5,8,11,2124 Two singlets are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum corresponding to the central ring, supporting a Cs-symmetric structure (2). In THF, compound 2 is 22% deprotonated by one equivalent of dimethylbenzylamine (DMBA) to reform 1, indicating that 2 is slightly less acidic than [DMBA]-H+ (pKa approx. 16.79 in MeCN25,26). This result also indicates that protonation of 1 is a reversible process. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) difference map of 2 shows, in addition to a chloride and two phosphines, a smaller electron density peak in proximity to nickel (r = 1.33(2) Å). This peak was assigned as a hydride ligand to complete a square planar coordination environment around the metal center. Consistent with this geometry, the Ni–C(arene) distances are long (> 2.5 Å), indicating weak interaction between the metal and the π system of the arene. Further, only a slight variation in the C–C bond lengths of the central arene is observed, with a difference between the longest and the shortest bonds of less than 0.02 Å (2, Figure 1). In contrast, the Ni–C bond lengths of 1 are about 1.99 Å, and the C–C bonds show differences of up to 0.07 Å.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis and reactivity of nickel hydrides and isotopic labeling studies. [HB]+A = [H(OEt2)2][B(C6H3(CF3)2)4] or [H3NC6H4CN][OTf]; B′ = dimethylbenzylamine.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Solid-state structures of 2, 3, 5·OTf, 5-NCMe·OTf, 7·BArF24 (left) and selected C–C and Ni–C distances, including 1 (right). Solvent molecules, anions, and select hydrogen atoms have been cropped for clarity.

Heating a C6H6 solution of 2 at 70 °C leads to clean generation of equimolar amounts of a new nickel-containing species (3, Scheme 1) and free diphosphine (4). The 1H NMR spectrum of 3 shows a singlet corresponding to only two hydrogens in the olefinic region. Additionally, two new peaks that integrate to two hydrogens each are present in the aliphatic region. An XRD study reveals that 3 possesses a Ni2Cl2 core that interacts with four carbons of the central ring (Figure 1). The remaining two central ring carbons are 1.519(1) Å apart, indicative of a single bond. Thus the present system provides a well-defined architecture to further our understanding of arene hydrogenation and H-migration from metals to arenes.8 Furthermore, “non-innocent” aromatic ligands that can store H-equivalents by incorporation into a π-system are of interest and have been recently described in the context of transformations such as water splitting into dioxygen and dihydrogen. 2731

To study the H-migration process, a cationic hydride variant was prepared by halide abstraction of 2 with TlOTf. XRD studies of crystals obtained from acetonitrile solution reveal the presence of two co-crystallized cationic species in the solid state. One species (5) is a nickel-hydride supported by two phosphines and a double bond of the central arene. The Ni–C distances (2.142(3)–2.157(3) Å) are shorter than in 2, indicating that displacement of the halide to generate a cationic species leads to a stronger interaction of the metal center with the arene (Figure 1). The central arene C–C bond lengths indicate similar dearomatization as in 1 (variation up to 0.06 Å). The second species has acetonitrile coordinated to the site previously occupied by chloride (5-NCMe). Similar to 2, the Ni-C distances are long (> 2.4 Å). Peaks in the XRD difference map are assigned to hydrides of 5 and 5-NCMe and complete pseudo-square planar coordination environments around the metal centers. On the NMR time scale, a single species is detected in an acetonitrile solution of 5, with a Ni–H signal at −25.1 ppm. In CD2Cl2, the Ni-H peak is at −17.6 ppm. Titration of this solution with acetonitrile leads to a gradual shift of the Ni-H peak towards the chemical shift in acetonitrile. This behavior suggests that coordination of acetonitrile to 5 is rapid and reversible in solution. Assuming that in acetonitrile the chemical shift of the hydride corresponds to 5-MeCN, the equilibrium constant for acetonitrile dissociation from 5-MeCN was determined to be 1.13 M. In THF, 5 is 26% deprotonated by one equivalent of DMBA, suggesting that it is of comparable acidity to 2.

Handling of 5 in solvents such as THF or DCM at room temperature leads to the formation of two new species displaying no upfield 1H NMR signals indicative of a metal hydride over several days. As determined by various NMR correlation experiments, one species (6) possesses three olefinic protons and two methylene protons on its central ring (see SI). A pair of doublets (JPP = 10.9 Hz) is observed by 31P NMR spectroscopy. While reliable crystallographic information has not been obtained for compound 6, NMR data is consistent with H-migration to the central ring at the position ortho to an aryl-aryl linkage (Scheme 1).

The species (7) observed in mixture with 6 possesses two olefinic 1H peaks and a pair of 31P doublets (JPP = 1.4 Hz). XRD characterization of 7 shows that the two arene-arene linkages display different angles, with one being significantly removed from coplanarity with respect to the central ring. The C–C bonds of the central ring adjacent to this aryl-aryl linkage are elongated (> 1.47 Å). The nickel center displays close contacts to only three carbons of the central ring (< 2.2 Å), reminiscent of a metal-allyl interaction. Consistent with this bonding description, a double bond appears to be localized between the remaining two carbons of the central ring.3234 The crystallographic and NMR data is consistent with H-migration to the ipso-carbon of the central ring (Scheme 1).

To further explore the potential of the arene pincer for reversible storage of H-equivalents, the isolated cationic product (6) of Ni-to-C H-migration was investigated. Heating of 5 in THF was interrupted when a mixture of 6 (62%), 5 (26%), and 7 (12%) was generated (eq 1). Addition of chloride to this mixture leads to the formation of 2 (85%) and 7 (15%) which is consistent with the quantitative conversion of 6 and 5 into 2. Treatment of the mixture of 6, 5, and 7 with 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) leads to the formation of 1. While generation of 2 from 5 by coordination of chloride is expected, the generation of 2 from 6 is less mechanistically obvious. In an acid-base mechanism, chloride could act as a base to deprotonate 6, generating 1 and HCl as intermediates toward 2. This explanation is inconsistent with the stability of 7 toward chloride and the weak basicity of chloride (predicted pKa(HCl) = 10.30 in MeCN35). In an alternate mechanism, chloride could bind to nickel and weaken metal-carbon interactions, leading to more reactive methylene C–H bonds that would be prone to undergo C-to-Ni H-transfer. Intramolecular H-migration between a metal center and a delocalized π-bound ligand has been proposed previously, for example, for the hydrogenation of arene by cobalt hydrides and for isotopic scrambling in the reductive elimination of alkane from bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)zirconium derivatives.36,37 Direct deprotonation of arenium moiety by added base cannot be ruled out especially for stronger bases, however, given that both 6 and 7 are converted to 1 by DBU (pKa([DBU]-H+) = 24.34 in MeCN26).

graphic file with name nihms275958e1.jpg (1)

The H-migration processes were studied in detail. Heating of 5 for 1h at 75 °C in CD3CN leads initially to formation of 6 with little generation of 7; further heating converts 6 to 7 (Scheme 1). These observations are consistent with H-migration from the metal center to the less substituted carbon of the central arene, under kinetic control to first generate intermediate 6. Further Hmigration around the ring to the ipso-carbon gives the thermodynamic product 7. Calculations have suggested that ipso protonation is thermodynamically disfavored vs ortho or para protonation of biphenyl,38 but the relative stability of 5 might be due to release of terphenyl strain that is present in all other mononuclear complexes of ligand 4 (1, 2, 5 and 6). Protonations of 1 with [H(OEt2)][B(C6H3(CF3)2)4] or [H3NC6H4CN][OTf] (OTf = triflate) in acetonitrile at room temperature lead to 5 and 6 upon mixing (Scheme 1). The fast formation of 6 suggests that 5 is not an intermediate in this case. Hence, direct intermolecular protonation at the carbon is a viable mechanistic pathway in these systems. Again, formation of 7 is kinetically unfavorable.

Isotopic labeling studies have provided further mechanistic insight (Scheme 1). Nickel complexes of 4-d4 (2H-labeled at the central arene) were prepared. Complex 5-d4 converts to 6-d4 with 1H incorporation primarily at the endo methylene position of the central ring (Xe, Scheme 1). No 1H incorporation occurs at the olefinic positions (Xg, Xh, or Xj). Unreacted 5-d4 (during the conversion to 6-d4) showed no label scrambling. Lack of 1H incorporation at the olefinic positions indicates that after H-transfer from metal to carbon (similar to process A, Scheme 2), 1,2-H shifts (process B) from methylene to methine do not occur on the time scale of the experiment.39,40 1H incorporation at the endo methylene position suggests an intramolecular mechanism for conversion of 5 to 6. The rate of formation of 6 from 5 is solvent dependent, indicating that coordination of nitrile to 5 inhibits H-migration. The nickel interaction with the π-system, which is stronger in the absence of acetonitrile, may be a determining factor for ring activation toward H-transfer.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Proposed mechanism for isotopic scrambling between the metal hydride and the phosphine backbone.

Upon heating, 2-d4 leads to significant label distribution to all positions of the ring in 3 (% 1H incorporation at aliphatic positions Xa and Xb, and olefinic position Xc is 34:30:24, Scheme 1) but also into free phosphine, 4 (Xd, 12%). Analysis of unreacted 2-d4 at 50% conversion shows ~60% of 1H scrambled into the aromatic positions. Label scrambling in 2-d4 suggests a mechanism similar to the conversion of 5 to 6 (process A, Scheme 2), but followed by either 1,2-H-shift from methylene to methine (process B) and then migration of H(D) back to nickel (process A′), or intermolecular H-transfer back to metal to give isotopomer 2-d4-i. This scrambling further attests to the reversible H-shuttling potential of pincer arenes. As with 5 in acetonitrile, compound 2 requires heating for H-migration to occur; this, again, may be a consequence of a weaker interaction between nickel and the central arene. This proposal is consistent with the difference in the isotopic label scrambling between the cationic and neutral hydrides; a weaker interaction between the halide-coordinated nickel and the π-system may allow for facile 1,2-H shifts if an arenium moiety is formed. In contrast, assuming that the π-system of 6 is localized as in 7 (as a strong nickel-allyl-like interaction adjacent to a double bond), 1,2-H shifts are less accessible for the cationic species.

The sequence of steps subsequent to H-migration leading to the dinuclear species 3 and free phosphine are not clear. Nevertheless, isotopic scrambling in the 2-d4 (Scheme 2) explains the incorporation of 1H at all positions on the central ring of 3 and 4; the lower than expected statistical 1H content in the resulting free phosphine, however, suggests an isotope effect for subsequent steps that favors 1H incorporation into the partially reduced arene of 3. The driving force for this reaction may be the formation of a NiI2Cl2 moiety, which has been observed in a few reactions with this ligand. A combination of bridging halides, Ni-Ni bonding, and Ni-arene interactions may render 3 as the thermodynamic product.

In summary, neutral and cationic nickel-hydride complexes supported by a terphenyl diphosphine have been synthesized. The neutral nickel-hydride has been shown to partially hydrogenate the pincer arene. The H-migration was studied in detail using isotopic labeling and characterization of intermediates observed with the cationic hydrides. Metal-to-arene H-migration was found to be reversible by isotopic labeling; chloride addition to a nickel-bound arenium species results in H-migration from carbon back to metal. Future studies will focus on exploring applications of the uncovered H-storage capacity of the arene pincer and the effect of the ligand framework on the hydridic character of the Ni–H moiety.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004
5_si_005

Acknowledgments

We thank Lawrence M. Henling for crystallographic assistance. We are grateful to Caltech, bp, and NSF GRFP (SL) for funding. The Bruker KAPPA APEXII X-ray diffractometer was purchased via an NSF CRIF:MU award to Caltech, CHE-0639094. The 400 MHz NMR spectrometer was purchased via an NIH award, RR027690.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, characterization data, and crystallographic details for 2–7 (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Benson EE, Kubiak CP, Sathrum AJ, Smieja JM. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:89. doi: 10.1039/b804323j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rakowski Dubois M, Dubois DL. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:1974. doi: 10.1021/ar900110c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Breitenfeld J, Vechorkin O, Corminboeuf Cm, Scopelliti R, Hu X. Organometallics. 2010;29:3686. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chakraborty S, Zhang J, Krause JA, Guan H. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8872. doi: 10.1021/ja103982t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chakraborty S, Krause JA, Guan H. Organometallics. 2008;28:582. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tran BL, Pink M, Mindiola DJ. Organometallics. 2009;28:2234. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tolman CA. J Am Chem Soc. 1972;94:2994. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laird MF, Pink M, Tsvetkov NP, Fan H, Caulton KG. Dalton Transactions. 2009:1283. doi: 10.1039/b822677f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmeier TJ, Hazari N, Incarvito CD, Raskatov JA. Chem Commun. 2011;47:1824. doi: 10.1039/c0cc03898a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bach I, Goddard R, Kopiske C, Seevogel K, Porschke KR. Organometallics. 1998;18:10. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Iluc VM, Hillhouse GL. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:7577. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iluc VM, Hillhouse GL. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:11890. doi: 10.1021/ja1052329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Curtis CJ, Miedaner A, Raebiger JW, DuBois DL. Organometallics. 2003;23:511. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vicic DA, Jones WD. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:10855. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vicic DA, Jones WD. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:7606. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Muetterties EL, Bleeke JR. Acc Chem Res. 1979;12:324. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Muetterties EL, Hirsekorn FJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:4063. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee CH, Cook TR, Nocera DG. Inorg Chem. 2011;50:714. doi: 10.1021/ic102017t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Velian A, Lin S, Miller AJM, Day MW, Agapie T. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6296. doi: 10.1021/ja101699a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Muetterties EL, Bleeke JR, Wucherer EJ, Albright T. Chem Rev. 1982;82:499. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liang LC, Chien PS, Lee PY. Organometallics. 2008;27:3082. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aresta M, Quaranta E, Dibenedetto A, Giannoccaro P, Tommasi I, Lanfranchi M, Tiripicchio A. Organometallics. 1997;16:834. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Steinke T, Shaw BK, Jong H, Patrick BO, Fryzuk MD. Organometallics. 2009;28:2830. doi: 10.1021/ja901346g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boro BJ, Duesler EN, Goldberg KI, Kemp RA. Inorg Chem. 2009;48:5081. doi: 10.1021/ic8020194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teitel’baum AB, Kudryavtseva LA, Bel’skii VE, Ivanov BE. Russ Chem Bull. 1980;29:1571. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kaljurand I, Kütt A, Sooväli L, Rodima T, Mäemets V, Leito I, Koppel IA. J Org Chem. 2005;70:1019. doi: 10.1021/jo048252w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ben-Ari E, Leitus G, Shimon LJW, Milstein D. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:15390. doi: 10.1021/ja066411i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Steinke T, Shaw BK, Jong H, Patrick BO, Fryzuk MD, Green JC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10461. doi: 10.1021/ja901346g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gunanathan C, Gnanaprakasam B, Iron MA, Shimon LJW, Milstein D. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:14763. doi: 10.1021/ja107770y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khaskin E, Iron MA, Shimon LJW, Zhang J, Milstein D. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8542. doi: 10.1021/ja103130u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kohl SW, Weiner L, Schwartsburd L, Konstantinovski L, Shimon LJW, Ben-David Y, Iron MA, Milstein D. Science. 2009;324:74. doi: 10.1126/science.1168600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keane JM, Chordia MD, Mocella CJ, Sabat M, Trindle CO, Harman WD. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:6806. doi: 10.1021/ja039824h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Harman WD. Chem Rev. 1997;97:1953. doi: 10.1021/cr940316n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harman WD. Coord Chem Rev. 2004;248:853. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kütt A, Rodima T, Saame J, Raamat E, Mäemets V, Kaljurand I, Koppel IA, Garlyauskayte RY, Yagupolskii YL, Yagupolskii LM, Bernhardt E, Willner H, Leito I. J Org Chem. 2010;76:391. doi: 10.1021/jo101409p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hirsekorn FJ, Rakowski MC, Muetterties EL. J Am Chem Soc. 1975;97:237. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McAlister DR, Erwin DK, Bercaw JE. J Am Chem Soc. 1978;100:5966. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Necula A, Racoveanu-Schiketanz A, Gheorghiu MD, Scott LT. J Org Chem. 1995;60:3448. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuck D. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2002;213:101. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Olah GA, Schlosberg RH, Porter RD, Mo YK, Kelly DP, Mateescu GD. J Am Chem Soc. 1972;94:2034. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004
5_si_005

RESOURCES