Skip to main content
PMC home page
Experimental Diabetes Research logoLink to Experimental Diabetes Research
. 2011 Mar 13;2011:754132. doi: 10.1155/2011/754132

Exogenous Superoxide Dismutase: Action on Liver Oxidative Stress in Animals with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes

Fábio Cangeri Di Naso 1,*, Alexandre Simões Dias 1, 2,2, Marilene Porawski 1, 3,3, Norma Anair Possa Marroni 1, 4,4
PMCID: PMC3061218  PMID: 21437212

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the effects of exogenous antioxidant copper zinc superoxide dismutase (Cu/Zn SOD) on oxidative stress in the experimental model of diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods. Twenty eight male Wistar rats divided in four groups were used: control (CO), controls treated with SOD (CO + SOD), diabetics (DM), and diabetics treated with SOD (DM + SOD). SOD (orgotein, 13 mg/Kg body weight was administered. DM was induced by a single streptozotocin injection (i.p., 70 mg/kg), and 60 days later, we evaluated liver oxidative stress. Results. Liver lipoperoxidation was increased in the DM group and significantly decreased in the DM + SOD group. Nitrite and nitrate measures were reduced in the DM and increased in the DM + SOD group, while iNOS expression in the DM group was 32% greater than in the CO and 53% greater in the DM + SOD group than in the DM group (P < .01). P65 expression was 37% higher in the DM (P < .05), and there was no significant difference between the DM and DM + SOD groups. Conclusion. SOD treatment reduced liver oxidative stress in diabetic animals, even though it did not change NFκB. SOD also increased NO, probably by the increased dismutation of the superoxide radical. The iNOS expression increase, which became even more evident after SOD administration.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder of increasing incidence and clinical relevance, contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates [1]. Due to population aging, urbanization, increased prevalence of obesity, and physical inactivity, the number of individuals affected by DM is increasing in many parts of the world [2]. In view of this growing incidence, the study of the physiological routes of DM becomes crucial for the emergence of novel therapeutic procedures [3].

Four physiopathological pathways are involved and cause the chronic complications of the disease: the polyols pathway, protein kinase C activation, increase in the hexosamine flow rate, and the advanced glycation end-products (AGE) pathway. Although the disorder presents different routes of activation, oxidative stress (OE) is present in all the above-mentioned pathways.

Strategies to reduce the formation of superoxide anion (O−·) and thus oxidative stress are relevant to the treatment of DM [4]. The action of O−· scavengers is performed by a group of antioxidant enzymes called superoxide dismutases (SODs), which catalyze the dismutation of O−· into hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and oxygen (O2) efficiently and specifically. Mammal tissues have 3 SODs isoforms: Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1), Mn SOD (SOD2), and extracellular SOD (EC-SOD, or SOD3). SOD1 is a 32 kDA homodimer cell protein containing copper and zinc, and it is present in the cytosol, nucleus, peroxisomes, and mitochondrial membrane. Its primary function is to reduce the steady intracellular concentration of superoxide [5].

At the same time McCord and Fridovich were purifying SOD, another team of researchers purified orgotein [6], an anti-inflammatory compound identical to SOD. Orgotein is the generic name adapted by the USAN Council (U.S. Adopted Names Council) for Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD). This compound is obtained from bovine liver through a process involving thermal treatment, enzymatic digestion of other proteins, and purification of the homogenate through ionic exchange chromatography [7]. In the 1980s, approximately six million doses of SOD were administered to patients in Europe [8]. A number of clinical trials showed the effects of using orgotein in inflammatory disorders. Among these it is highlighted the use of orgotein in acute complications secondary to radiotherapy and intense radiation in the head, neck [9] and pelvis [10], in Peyronie's disease [11, 12], arthritis [7, 13, 14], bladder contracture [11, 15], multiple sclerosis [16], and hypertrophic scars, and cheloids [17].

The liver is the main organ of oxidative and detoxifying processes as well as free radical reactions; in many diseases, biomarkers of oxidative stress are elevated in the liver at an early stage. Because liver is subjected to ROS-mediated injury in diabetes, our experiments were performed to investigate the potential protective effects of SOD treatment on liver oxidative stress and p65 and iNOS expression in an experimental model of chronic hyperglycemia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Protocol

The experimental protocol was according to the norms established by the Ethical Research Committee of Health of the Research and Postgraduate Group of the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre, as well as the recommendations of the Principles for Research Involving Animals (NAS). Twenty-eight male Wistar rats obtained from the breeding colony of the Basic Health Sciences Institute of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) were used. Their mean weight was 200–300 grams (g) at the start of the trials. They were kept at a room with controlled temperature (22 ± 4°C) and at a 12 h light/dark cycle (light from 7 a.m to 7 p.m).

DM was induced by a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of streptozotocin—STZ (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a dose of 70 mg/Kg body weight [18]. STZ was dissolved in citrate sodium buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.5) and citric acid (0.1 M, pH 4.5) and administered in the left abdominal region about 10 min after dilution in buffer solution. The animals in the control group were given only sodium chloride (NaCl 0.9%) i.p. at the same volume of the buffer that was used to dissolve STZ.

Twenty-eight male Wistar rats were divided in four groups: control (CO), controls treated with SOD (CO + SOD), diabetics (DM), and diabetics treated with SOD (DM + SOD). Superoide dismutase (Ontosein-orgotein-, Lab. Tedea-Meiji Farma, S. A., Madrid-Spain) was used at a dose of 13 mg/Kg body weight for the last seven days of the trial and was administered subcutaneously as described elsewhere [19]. On day 60, the animals were sacrificed and their liver removed for posterior analyses.

After 60 days of DM, the animals were deeply anesthetized and killed by exsanguination. Blood was withdrawn from the retro-orbital sinus and centrifuged for 15 minutes for glycemia determination, and the liver was removed in portions and frozen at −80°C for posterior measurements.

2.2. Biochemical Analyses and Oxidative Stress

2.2.1. Glycemia

For glycemia determination the colorimetric enzymatic test (Kit ENZI-COLOR, Bio Diagnóstica) was used, in which a reagent was mixed with 20 μL of the plasma sample and read in spectrophotometer (CARY 3E —UV-Visible Spectrophotometer Varian) with wavelength of 500 nm. Animals with blood glucose concentration above 250 mg/dL were considered as diabetics.

2.2.2. Oxidative Stress

The liver was homogenized with 9 mL of phosphate buffer (KCL 140 mM, phosphate 20 mM pH 7.4) per tissue gram. Protein concentration in the liver homogenates was determined using bovine albumin solution as described by Lowry [20].

Liver peroxidation was determined by the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBA-RS) assay [21].

For determination of antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) we used the technique based on inhibition of adrenochrome formation in epinephrine autoxidation [22], and antioxidant enzyme catalase activity was determined by measuring the exponential disappearance of H2O2 at 240 nm and was expressed as pmoles/mg protein [23].

The determination of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase (GPx) was obtained through a method that consists in measuring NADPH oxidation by glutathione reductase [24].

2.3. Nitrite and Nitrate Measures

Total nitrites was measured by Griess's method. The samples were incubated with enzymatic cofactors (Tris 1 mol/L, pH 7.5; NADPH 0.02 mmol/L), glucose 6-phosphate, (G6P) 5 mmol/L, glucose 6-P dehydrogenase (G6PDH) 10 U/ml, and nitrate reductase (1.75 U/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for one hour to convert nitrate into nitrite at room temperature. Nitrites were determined by the reaction of samples with Griess's reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% naphthylenediamine 2.3 mL phosphoric acid 85%). Total tissue nitrite (initial nitrite plus the nitrite produced from sodium reduction) was estimated at 540 nm, from a standard curve of sodium nitrite (10−8 a 10−3 mol/L). The results were expressed as mmol/L [25].

2.3.1. Western Blot

Protein extraction and Western blotting were performed as described elsewhere [26]. The membranes were incubated with anti-iNOS polyclonal antibody and specific anti-p65 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Binding to the primary antibody was detected through rabbit anti-immunoglobulin bound to HRP (DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark). Protein detection was performed by chemiluminescence using a commercial kit ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Great-Britain) exposing the membrane to this commercial mixture for one minute. A cassette tape was subsequently introduced with developing film (Amersham Hyperfilm ECL, UK) for about 2 minutes.

After washing the film, the bands were quantified by densitometry using program Scion Image 4.02 for Windows (Scion Corporation, Frederick, USA), with results being expressed in relation to control percentage (100%).

2.3.2. Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 15.0 (SPSS-15.0). Variables were tested for normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for inter-group differences. The student Newman-Keuls posttest was used for parametric variables, and Person's test was used for correlation of variables. The level of significance was 5% (P < .05).

3. Results

Exogenous SOD administration failed to reduce glycemia in diabetic rats. There was a significant decrease in animal weight in the DM group, and SOD treatment (DM + SOD) did not reverse this condition (Table 1). The DM group showed a significant increase in liver lipoperoxidation and treatment with exogenous SOD significantly reduced these values (Table 2). SOD and GPx activities were reduced in the DM group and the DM + SOD group showed an increase in enzymatic activities. Catalase activity was increased in the DM group and the treatment with SOD restored the activity values close to those of the CO group. Nitrite and nitrate measures were reduced in the DM group and were increased after treatment with SOD (Table 2). In addition, a positive correlation was found between SOD activity and high levels of nitrites and nitrates (P = .023; r = 0.565).

Table 1.

Changes in body weight and glycemia.

N Weight (g) Glycemia (mg/dL)
CO 5 332.8 ± 27.66 237.95 ± 54.27
CO + SOD 6 312 ± 25.45 217.23 ± 27.45
DM 8 299.33 ± 46.17 481.29 ± 84.15
DM + SOD 9 266.28 ± 28.23 397.43 ± 29.15
Open in a new tab

Data appear as mean ± SD. CO: Control SOD: superoxide dismutase DM = Diabetes Mellitus P < .01—CO versus DM + SOD; CO + SOD versus DM + SOD P < .001—CO versus DM; CO + SOD versus DM.

Table 2.

Oxidative stress, antioxidant enzyme activity and total nitrites and nitrates (NOx).

CO (5) CO + SOD (6) DM (8) DM + SOD (9) ANOVA
CO versus DM DM versusDM + SOD
TBARS (nmols/mg prot.) 0.20 ± 0.03 0.21 ± 0.04 0.36 ± 0.15 0.18 ± 0.04 P < .05 P < .01
SOD (U/mg prot.) 37.53 ± 11.61 39.83 ± 10.53 22.74 ± 4.23 62.73 ± 20.18 P < .05 P < .0001
CAT (pmols/mg prot.) 0.18 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.03 0.17 ± 0.03 P < .01 P < .001
GPx (nmols/mg prot.) 0.91 ± 0.06 0.75 ± 0.19 0.53 ± 0.10 0.76 ± 0.16 P < .01 P < .05
NOx (mM NO3+NO2) 2.32 ± 0.54 2.24 ± 0.27 1.47 ± 0.61 2.28 ± 0.20 P < .05 P < .05
Open in a new tab

INOS expression was increased in the DM group as compared to the CO group, and the SOD-treated group showed an increase as compared to the DM group itself (Figure 1). P65 had greater expression in the DM (P < .05) and no statistical difference as compared to the diabetic and SOD-treated groups (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes and SOD on liver iNOS protein by Western blot analysis. Proteins were separated in SDS-polyacrylamide gel at 12% and incubated with anti-iNOS antibody. (a) CO versus DM P < .05; (b) DM versus DM + SOD P < .01; (c) CO + SOD versus DM + SOD P < .001; (d) CO + SOD versus DM P < .01; (e) CO + SOD versus DM + SOD P < .001.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes and SOD on p65 protein by Western blot analysis. The nuclear fraction protein was separated in SDS-polyacrylamide gel at 12% and incubated with anti-p65 antibody. (a) CO versus DM P < .05; (b) DM versus DM + SOD P > .05; (c) CO + SOD versus DM + SOD P > .05; (d) CO + SOD versus DM P > .05; (e) CO + SOD versus DM + SOD P > .05.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study confirmed previous studies which described increased liver oxidative stress in the model of experimental diabetes mellitus [27]. These studies showed alterations in the activity of antioxidant enzymes associated with liver oxidative injury. Being rich in mitochondria to perform metabolic functions, the liver is a crucially important organ, and in a chronic hyperglycemic state the liver oxidative stress is considered a relevant process [28].

Exogenous SOD administration did not affect the glycemic values of diabetic animals. This finding contradicts a few results from previous studies which used antioxidants in the treatment of experimental DM [29]. Such different results could be due to the time and duration of the SOD treatment, which in our study occurred during the last week of a 60-day trial, whereas in other studies it was concomitant with induction.

SOD is an important antioxidant enzyme which rapidly catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide anion (O−·) and thus acts as a first line antioxidant defense. In the case of SOD deficiency or increased superoxide production, it reacts with nitric oxide to produce peroxynitrite (ONOO−), which is a potent oxidant and nitrosating agent that can cause direct damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA [8].

Since oxidative stress results from an imbalance between the generation of reactive oxygen species and/or nitrogen and the body's endogenous and exogenous defense ability, the study of the activity of antioxidant enzymes in DM becomes highly important.

In the present study, a significant increase was found in liver peroxidation in the DM group and a reduction in this oxidative stress marker following treatment with exogenous SOD, as well as reduced antioxidant enzymes SOD and GPx activities in DM and a significant increase after treatment. The reduction in SOD activity in the DM group can be explained by glycation in the EC-SOD heparin-binding domain. This domain anchors the protein to the endothelial cells surface and extracellular matrix of blood vessels [30, 31]. The affinity with heparin can be modulated by hyperglycemia, through the nonenzymatic glycation of EC-SOD lysine residues located in the heparin-binding domain. This glycation determines loss of heparin affinity but maintains SOD enzymatic activity in the extracellular medium. However, studies performed in diabetic patients show high serum levels of glycated EC-SOD and reduction in the arterial activity of this enzyme. These findings could be explained by glycation inhibiting the intracellular Cu/Zn SOD and this process indirectly affecting EC-SOD function [30, 31]. NO and its reactive species can cross the cell membrane and modulate the relaxation of smooth muscle and vascular tone response. In the extracellular medium, NO can establish a connection with great quantity of superoxide resulting from an extensive process of protein glycation in DM. Therefore, decreased vascular concentration of EC-SOD, reduced intracellular SOD activity, and increased production of superoxide anion are directly involved in the pathogenic process of DM, and the use of exogenous SOD may have a beneficial effect of reversing this process.

Peixoto et al. (2009) investigated the effects of a mimetic of SOD, the tempol, on renal oxidative stress in diabetic hypertensive rats. The study showed improvements in renal function accompanied by improvements in redox status with the use of exogenous enzyme. The improvement of the redox state can be proved by the increased expression of EC-SOD in renal cortex of animals treated with the SOD mimetic, in addition to reducing the generation of reactive oxygen species [32].

A number of studies have shown the involvement of NO and superoxide anion radical in the physiopathological process of chronic complications in DM [33]. Moreover, NO and other related free radicals and oxidative species are the greatest agents of β-pancreatic cell necrosis. In our study, there was evidence of a reduction in NO metabolites in the DM group and an increase in it after exogenous SOD administration. In addition, antioxidant enzyme SOD activity was found to be positively correlated with nitrite and nitrate levels (P = .023; r = 0.565).

These findings show a greater availability of nitric oxide in diabetic animals treated with SOD, probably due to increased activity of antioxidant enzyme SOD. From these results one can establish a direct action from SOD dismutating the superoxide radical and an indirect action of this drug related to NO [9, 33]. Coppey et al. demonstrated the effect of treatment with a SOD functional mimetic M40403 to prevent vascular and neural complications in experimental diabetes. These studies provide additional evidence that diabetes-induced oxidative stress and the generation of superoxide and perhaps peroxynitrite may be partially responsible for the development of diabetic complications [34].

Through an imbalance in the redox state, DM triggers the activation of nuclear transcription factors such as NFκB. The nuclear transcription factor NFκB binds to DNA as a heterodimer of 50 kDa (p50) and 65 kDa (p65). The p65 subunit is responsible for the activation potential of NFκB [35]. NFκB activation is responsible for an increase in iNOS expression. In our study, as well as in Dias et al. [27], there was increased expression of nuclear p65 and iNOS, showing NFκB activation in experimental DM. However, the use of exogenous SOD did not reduce p65 and increased iNOS expression. Experimental studies have demonstrated that the use of antioxidants can reduce oxidative stress, inhibit the activation of redox-dependent transcription factors [27], and the iNOS expression [36]. In our study, exogenous SOD administration determined changes to antioxidant enzyme activity and oxidative stress, but such changes did not cause p65 modification. There was iNOS expression increase, which became even more evident after SOD administration. The results of exogenous SOD administration in our experimental model differ from those of other in vitro studies showing iNOS regulation by antioxidant enzyme SOD [37, 38].

It is concluded that exogenous SOD treatment reduces liver oxidative stress in diabetic animals and increases antioxidant enzyme activity, despite not altering nuclear transcription factor NFκB. Nevertheless, there is a significant change to p65 and iNOS, which justifies the performance of further studies in the use of exogenous antioxidants for DM treatment.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Brazilian Agencies “Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE) do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)”, and “Laboratório de Hepatologia e Fisiologia Experimental da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (HCPA/UFRGS)”.

References

  • 1.Zimmet P, Alberti KGMM, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature. 2001;414(6865):782–787. doi: 10.1038/414782a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–1053. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ceriello A. New insights on oxidative stress and diabetic complications may lead to a “causal” antioxidant therapy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1589–1596. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nozik-Grayck E, Suliman HB, Piantadosi CA. Extracellular superoxide dismutase. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2005;37(12):2466–2471. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2005.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Landis GN, Tower J. Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2005;126(3):365–379. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huber W. Orgotein-(bovine Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase), an anti-inflammatory protein drug: discovery, toxicology and pharmacology. European Journal of Rheumatology and Inflammation. 1981;4(2):173–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huber W, Menander-Huber KB, Saifer MG, Williams LD. Bioavailability of superoxide dismutase: implications for the anti-inflammatory action mechanism of orgotein. Agents and Actions Supplements. 1980;7:185–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiological Reviews. 2007;87(1):315–424. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Valencia J, Velilla C, Urpegui A, et al. The efficacy of orgotein in the treatment of acute toxicity due to radiotherapy on head and neck tumors. Tumori. 2002;88(5):385–389. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Esco R, Valencia J, Coronel P, Carceller JA, Gimeno M, Bascón N. Efficacy of orgotein in prevention of late side effects of pelvic irradiation: a randomized study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2004;60(4):1211–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Marberger H, Bartsch G, Huber W. Orgotein: a new drug for the treatment of radiation cystitis. Current Therapeutic Research—Clinical and Experimental. 1975;18(3):466–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gustafson H, Johansson B, Edsmyr F. Peyronie’s disease: experience of local treatment with Orgotein. European Urology. 1981;7(6):346–348. doi: 10.1159/000473262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McIlwain H, Silverfield JC, Cheatum DE, et al. Intra-articular orgotein in osteoarthritis of the knee: a placebo-controlled efficacy, safety, and dosage comparison. American Journal of Medicine. 1989;87(3):295–300. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(89)80154-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mazieres B, Masquelier AM, Capron MH. A French controlled multicenter study of intraarticular orgotein versus intraarticular corticosteroids in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a one-year followup. Journal of Rheumatology. 1991;18(27):134–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stroker W, Schlutz A. Treatment of contracted bladder with orgotein. Report of experiences. Urologe A. 1986;25(4):209–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lund-Olesen K. Intrathecal orgotein. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Research. 1985;5(1):59–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grosser A, Stark F, Landthaler M. Treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids with orgotein. Hautarzt. 1984;35(7):377–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Like AA, Rossini AA. Streptozotocin induced pancreatic insulitis: new model of diabetes mellitus. Science. 1976;193(4251):415–417. doi: 10.1126/science.180605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Seguí J, Gironella M, Sans M, et al. Superoxide dismutase ameliorates TNBS-induced colitis by reducing oxidative stress, adhesion molecule expression, and leukocyte recruitment into the inflamed intestine. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 2004;76(3):537–544. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0304196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1951;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buege JA, Aust SD. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods in Enzymology. 1978;52:302–310. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(78)52032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Misra HP, Fridovich I. The role of superoxide anion in the autoxidation of epinephrine and a simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1972;247(10):3170–3175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods in Enzymology. 1984;105:121–126. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Likidlilid A, Patchanans N, Poldee S, Peerapatdit T. Glutathione and glutathione peroxidase in type 1 diabetic patients. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2007;90(9):1759–1767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmidt HHHW, Wilke P, Evers B, Bohme E. Enzymatic formation of nitrogen oxides from L-arginine in bovine brain cytosol. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1989;165(1):284–291. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)91067-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dias AS, Porawski M, Alonso M, Marroni N, Collado PS, González-Gallego J. Quercetin decreases oxidative stress, NF-κB activation, and iNOS overexpression in liver of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Journal of Nutrition. 2005;135(10):2299–2304. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.10.2299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ren XY, Li YN, Qi JS, Niu T. Peroxynitrite-induced protein nitration contributes to liver mitochondrial damage in diabetic rats. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2008;22(5):357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Coskun O, Kanter M, Korkmaz A, Oter S. Quercetin, a flavonoid antioxidant, prevents and protects streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress and β-cell damage in rat pancreas. Pharmacological Research. 2005;51(2):117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Adachi T, Ohta H, Hayashi K, Hirano K, Marklund SL. The site of nonenzymic glycation of human extracellular-superoxide dismutase in vitro. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 1992;13(3):205–210. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90016-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kawamura N, Ookawara T, Suzuki K, Konishi K, Mino M, Taniguchi N. Increased glycated Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase levels in erythrocytes of patients with insulin-dependent diabetis mellitus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1992;74(6):1352–1354. doi: 10.1210/jcem.74.6.1592880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peixoto EBMI, Pessoa BS, Biswas SK, Lopes De Faria JB. Antioxidant SOD mimetic prevents NADPH oxidase-induced oxidative stress and renal damage in the early stage of experimental diabetes and hypertension. American Journal of Nephrology. 2009;29(4):309–318. doi: 10.1159/000163767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cumaoglu A, Stefek M, Bauer V, Ari N, Aricioglu A, Karasu C. Glycoxidative and nitrosative stress in kidney of experimental diabetic rats: effects of the prydoindole antioxidant stobadine. Neuroendocrinology Letters. 2010;31(3):313–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Coppey LJ, Gellett JS, Davidson EP, et al. Effect of M40403 treatment of diabetic rats on endoneurial blood flow, motor nerve conduction velocity and vascular function of epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2001;134(1):21–29. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baeuerle PA. The inducible transcription activator NF-κB: regulation by distinct protein subunits. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1991;1072(1):63–80. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(91)90007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Di Naso FC, de Mello RN, Bona S, et al. Effect of Agaricus blazei Murill on the pulmonary tissue of animals with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Experimental diabetes research. 2010;2010:8 pages. doi: 10.1155/2010/543926. Article ID 543926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kato S, Esumi H, Hirano A, Kato M, Asayama K, Ohama E. Immunohistochemical expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in human brain tumors: relationships of iNOS to superoxide dismutase (SOD) proteins (SOD1 and SOD2), Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1) and p53 protein. Acta Neuropathologica. 2003;105(4):333–340. doi: 10.1007/s00401-002-0646-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ji AL, Ha YS, Sung MJ, et al. Differential regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression by superoxide dismutase in lipopolysaccharide stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Experimental and Molecular Medicine. 2009;41(9):629–637. doi: 10.3858/emm.2009.41.9.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental Diabetes Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES