Skip to main content
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International logoLink to Deutsches Ärzteblatt International
letter
. 2011 Mar 4;108(9):142. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2011.0142b

Correspondence (letter to the editor): Don't Forget Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy

Holger Trötschel *
PMCID: PMC3063369  PMID: 21442061

The authors of the article seem to be under the impression that multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has completely taken over from ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism.

It is certainly correct that MDCT is more readily available in emergency situations (especially during night shifts), but limitations often arise owing to the necessary administration of iodine containing contrast medium. In patients with allergies to contrast medium, different thyroid dysfunctions, and renal failure, administration of contrast medium, and therefore MDCT, is often not possible. Especially in these cases, ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is the method of choice for diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism, as it is non-invasive, low-risk, and tried and tested. An embolism can be detected with a sensitivity of 96–97% and a specificity of 90–95%.

References

  • 1.Pöppel TD, Krause BJ. Pulmonale Perfusions-Ventilationsszintigrafie in der Diagnostik der Lungenembolie. Radiologe. 2007;47:698–707. doi: 10.1007/s00117-007-1534-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schellhaaß A, Walther A, Konstantinides St, Böttiger BW. The diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(34-35):589–595. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Deutsches Ärzteblatt International are provided here courtesy of Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH

RESOURCES