Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Hypertension. 2009 Aug 3;54(3):502–508. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.134049

BLOOD PRESSURE DIFFERENCES BY ETHNIC GROUP AMONG U.S. CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Bernard Rosner 1, Nancy Cook 1, Ron Portman 2, Steve Daniels 3, Bonita Falkner 4
PMCID: PMC3064557  NIHMSID: NIHMS139528  PMID: 19652080

Abstract

Large differences in blood pressure by ethnic group are apparent among adults. There is uncertainty as to whether similar differences by ethnic group exist among children and if so, the age of onset.

Blood pressure (BP) measurements were obtained from 58,698 children at 78,556 visits using data from the Pediatric Task Force data, a collection of 11 studies with BP data from children and adolescents age 1–17. Generalized estimating equation methods were used to identify sex-specific differences in body mass index (BMI)-adjusted rates of BP elevation and pre-hypertension by ethnic group.

Significant BMI-adjusted differences in rates of BP elevation were found between Hispanic boys vs. Caucasian boys (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07–1.37, p=0.002). No overall significant differences were found between African-American (AA) boys vs. Caucasian (Cauc) boys (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.95–1.12, p=0.49); however, there was significant effect modification (p = 0.01) with significant differences found for normal weight boys (BMI < 85th percentile) (ORAA vs. Cauc = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03 –1.27, p=0.01), but not for overweight boys (BMI ≥ 85th percentile) (ORAA vs. Cauc = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.78–1.05, p=0.20). No overall ethnic group differences in BMI-adjusted rates of hypertension were found for girls.

Ethnic differences in prevalence rates of pediatric BP elevation that are not explained by obesity are present, primarily in boys. Whether these differences are due to genetic or environmental factors is unknown.

Keywords: blood pressure, hypertension, pediatrics, pediatric task force, pre-hypertension

Introduction

We have recently published BP percentiles in normal weight children that are adjusted for age, sex and height1. The analyses were based on children in the Pediatric Task Force Data Base with body mass index (BMI) < 85th percentile for a given age-sex group. Percentiles were obtained using quantile regression methods which were to found to fit the data better than the previously used polynomial regression methods. The percentiles are slightly lower than previously published Task Force levels2 which included both normal weight and overweight children in the normative database. We define a pre-hypertensive child as one whose systolic BP (SBP) or diastolic BP (DBP) is < 95th percentile and either ≥ 90th percentile or ≥ the adult threshold for pre-hypertension which is ≥120/80 mm Hg. BP elevation in children is defined as SBP and/or DBP ≥ 95th percentile.

An important issue in pediatric hypertension is whether prevalence varies by ethnic group. There are clear differences in the prevalence of hypertension by ethnic group in adults3, but results in children are more equivocal. A previous paper by our group4 compared African-American vs. Caucasian children using Task Force Data based on polynomial regression methods. Slight differences in mean BP were found between adolescent African- American girls vs. Caucasian girls that were mediated by body mass index (BMI) differences; no differences in mean BP were found between Caucasian and African-American boys. In the present report, we revisit these analyses using quantile regression methods since these were shown to be more accurate than polynomial regression methods. The latter assume that (a) the effect of height z-score is the same for all ages and (b) that distributions of pediatric BP are normally distributed, neither of which appear to be true for pediatric BP data. We use quantile regression methods with effects of age, height and age × height represented by cubic splines to estimate percentiles and expand the investigation by including Hispanic children as well. These methods provide for a more flexible response function relating BP to age and height and do not make assumptions of normality of residuals since separate sex-specific functions are used for each percentile. More details concerning these methods are provided elsewhere1.

Methods

The dataset used for this analysis consisted of all children in the Pediatric Task Force Database2. Normative data for BP as a function of age, gender and height have been determined for normal weight children. Normal weight children are defined as children whose BMI is < 85th percentile for their age and gender based on 2000 Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts5. BP percentiles as a function of age, sex and height for normal weight children are available at the following website: (http://www.geocities.com/bernardrosner/Pediatrics.html). The goal of the present manuscript was to compare rates of pre-hypertension and BP elevation among Caucasian, African- American and Hispanic children in the Pediatric Task Force Database. Ethnic group was obtained by self-report. These analyses included both normal weight (BMI<85th percentile) and overweight (BMI ≥85th percentile) children with BP standards based on normal weight children. We defined SBP elevation as SBP ≥ 95th percentile for a child’s age, gender and height. A similar criterion was used with DBP (K5) for DBP elevation. In addition, we defined overall BP elevation as ≥ 95th percentile for either SBP or DBP. We defined systolic pre-hypertension as < 95th percentile and either ≥90th percentile or ≥ 120 mm Hg. We defined diastolic pre-hypertension as < 95th percentile and either ≥ 90th percentile or ≥ 80 mm Hg. We defined overall pre-hypertension as (either systolic pre-hypertension or diastolic pre-hypertension) and no overall BP elevation.

Statistics

All analyses were performed separately for boys and girls. Since there were systematic differences among studies even after accounting for age, sex, height and BMI we used study-corrected BPs in the analyses as described previously1. Since some subjects had BP measured at multiple visits we used generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a logit link based on PROC GENMOD of SAS (Statistical Analysis System) to relate the presence of pre-hypertension or BP elevation at a particular visit to ethnic group with and without adjusting for BMI using the model:

log[pij/(1pij)]=α+β1xi1+β2xi2+γzij

where pij = prob (BP elevation or pre-hypertension) for the ith child at the jth visit, xi1 = 1 if subject i is African- American, = 0 otherwise, xi2 = 1 if subject i is Hispanic, = 0 otherwise, zij = BMI for the ith subject at the jth visit. To assess effect modification of ethnicity by BMI, we also considered GEE models of BP elevation (or pre-hypertension) on ethnicity, BMI and ethnicity × BMI given by

log[pij/(1pij)]=αA+β1Axi1+β2Axi2+β3Avij+β4Axi1vij+β5Axi2vij+γAzij

where vij = 1 if the ith subject is overweight at the jth visit, = 0 otherwise. β4A and β5A represent interaction effects of overweight by African-American and Hispanic ethnicity, respectively. To assess effects of ethnicity within (overweight/normal weight) subgroups we fit the model

log[pij/(1pij)]=αB+β0vij+β1Bxi1vij+β1Cxi1(1vij)+β2Bxi2vij+β2Cxi2(1vij)+γBzij

The coefficients (β1B, β2B) and (β1C, β2C) represent effects of African-American and Hispanic ethnicity vs. Caucasian for overweight and normal weight children, respectively.

To assess differences in overweight prevalence by ethnic group we fit the model

log[pij*/(1pij*)]=αC+δ1xi1+δ2xi2

Where pij* = prob (overweight) for the ith subject at the jth visit.

To assess the effect of overweight status on the prevalence of BP elevation or pre-hypertension within specific ethnic groups we fit the model

log[pij/(1pij)]=αD+β1Dxi1+β2Dxi2+γ1Dνij(1xi1)(1xi2)+γ2Dνijxi1+γ3Dνijxi2

Results

The demographic data for the database used in this study620 are presented in Table 1. A total of 58,698 children ages 1–17 provided data at 78,556 visits over 11 studies of whom 29,868 (51%) were boys and 28,830 (49%) were girls. 34,396 (59%) of the children were Caucasian, 18,016 (31%) were African- American and 6,288 (11%) were Hispanic. Diastolic BP was available for 43,152 (74%) of the children at 53,626 visits. Prevalence of BP elevation and pre-hypertension for systolic blood pressure (SBP) are presented by ethnic group, gender and BMI group (normal weight < 85th percentile for BMI/overweight ≥ 85th percentile for BMI) in Table 2.

Table 1.

Ethnic and Demographic Data By Study Population, Pediatric Task Force Data

Gender Ethnic Group Persons
(visits)
SBP Available
Persons
(visits)
DBP Available
Total No.
of Persons
(visits)
Source Time Period Age Boys Girls Caucasian African-American Hispanic
NHANES II 6 1976–1980 6–17 1,843 1,720 2,963 600 0 3,563 3,526 3,563
(3,563) (3,526) (3,563)
Pittsburgh 7 1975–1982 1–5 148 136 176 108 0 284 0 284
(890) (0) (890)
Dallas 8,9 1976–1980 13–17 5,915 5,649 4,728 5,266 1,570 11,564 11,564 11,564
   (21,859) (21,851) (21,859)
Bogalusa 1012 1973–1982 1–17 3,715 3,607 4,878 2,480 0 7,358 0 7,358
(15,880) (0) (15,880)
Houston 13 1975–1978 3–17 1,386 1,339 748 636 1,341 2,725 0 2,725
(2,725) (0) (2,725)
South Carolina 14 1982–1983 4–17 3,162 3,261 3,315 3,108 0 6,423 6,362 6,423
(6,423) (6,362) (6,423)
Iowa 15,16 1981 5–17 2,098 1,993 4,091 0 0 4,091 0 4,091
(4,091) (0) (4,091)
Providence 17 1985–1987 1–3 229 230 431 24 4 459 369 459
(894) (556) (894)
Minnesota 18 (sodium-potassium blood pressure trial in children) 1986–1987 9–17 7,916 7,367 11,307 3,421 555 15,283 15,127 15,283
(15,283) (15,127) (15,283)
NHANES III 19 1988–1991 5–17 2,405 2,513 1,322 1,768 1,828 4,918 4,202 4,918
(4,918) (4,202) (4,918)
NHANES 1999–2000 20 1999–2000 8–17 1,015 1,015 437 605 988 2,030 2,002 2,030
   (2,030) (2,002) (2,030)
TOTAL 1–17 29,868 28,830 34,396 18,016 6,288 58,698 43,152 58,698
   (%) (51) (49) (59) (31) (11) (78,556) (53,626) (78,556)

Table 2.

Percent of Pre- Hypertensive and Hypertensive Children for SBP by BMI Percentile, Ethnic Group and Gender*

Normal Weight Children Overweight Children Total
Unadjusted

BMI Adjusted
Ethnic
Group
Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
SBP Hypertension Boys
Caucasian 18,001 870 4.8 4,784 684 14.3 3.17
(2.84–3.54)
22,785 1,554 6.8 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
10,919 528 4.8 2,328 328 14.1 3.07
(2.63–3.58)
13,247 856 6.5 0.96
(0.87–1.05)
0.39 0.91
(0.83–1.00)
0.06
Hispanic 2,673 174 6.5 1,075 193 18.0 3.13
(2.51–3.90)
3,748 367 9.8 1.49
(1.31–1.68)
<0.001 1.29
(1.14–1.47)
<0.001
SBP Pre-Hypertension Boys
Caucasian 18,001 2,074 11.5 4,784 891 18.6 2.00
(1.82–2.18)
22,785 2,968 13.0 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
10,919 1,590 14.6 2,328 495 21.3 1.76
(1.56–1.98)
13,247 2,085 15.7 1.26
(1.18–1.34)
<0.001 1.21
(1.13–1.30)
<0.001
Hispanic 2,673 368 13.8 1,075 213 19.8 1.83
(1.51–2.23)
3,748 581 15.5 1.26
(1.14–1.40)
<0.001 1.05
(0.94–1.17)
0.41
SBP Hypertension Girls
Caucasian 17,691 856 4.8 4,164 556 13.4 2.94
(2.62–3.31)
21,855 1,412 6.5 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
10,174 542 5.3 3,131 452 14.4 2.93
(2.54–3.37)
13,305 994 7.5 1.16
(1.06–1.28)
0.001 1.00
(0.91–1.09)
0.92
Hispanic 2,540 124 4.9 1,076 172 16.0 3.61
(2.78–4.67)
3,616 296 8.2 1.24
(1.08–1.43)
0.003 1.02
(0.88–1.17)
0.82
SBP Pre-Hypertension Girls
Caucasian 17,691 1,216 6.9 4,164 514 12.3 2.13
(1.90–2.37)
21,855 1,730 7.9 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
10,174 813 8.0 3,131 414 13.2 1.96
(1.72–2.23)
13,305 1,227 9.2 1.20
(1.11–1.30)
<0.001 1.07
(0.98–1.16)
0.11
Hispanic 2,540 175 6.9 1,076 133 12.4 2.18
(1.71–2.79)
3,616 308 8.5 1.10
(0.97–1.26)
0.14 0.94
(0.83–1.08)
0.39
*

(Prehypertensive = (≥ 90th percentile or ≥ 120 mmHg) and < 95th percentile); hypertensive = ≥ 95th percentile based on quantile regression methods.

Normal weight children = BMI <85th percentile.

Overweight children=BMI >=85th percentile.

§

Based on Proc GENMOD of SAS.

Odds ratio for SBP hypertension (pre-hypertension) for overweight vs. normal weight children.

The data in table 2 demonstrate that for SBP, the odds of BP elevation is 2.9–3.6 times higher and the odds of pre-hypertension is 1.8–2.2 times higher among overweight children vs. normal weight children for all ethnic and gender groups. The odds ratio for BP elevation is slightly higher among overweight adolescents (age 13–17, OR = 3.1–3.5) than among overweight children (age 1–12, OR = 2.4–3.2). The odds ratio for prehypertension was similar for children and adolescents (data not shown). Also, overweight prevalence is significantly higher among Hispanic boys (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.47–1.75, p<0.001) and girls (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.65–1.96, p<0.001) than their Caucasian peers (data not shown). Results for African-Americans differed by gender with a lower overweight prevalence for African-American boys (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.78–0.88, p<0.001) and a higher prevalence for African-American girls (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.23–1.39, p<0.001) than their Caucasian peers. Prevalence of SBP elevation ranges from 7–10% among boys and 7–8% among girls. Prevalence of systolic pre-hypertension ranges from 13–16% among boys and 8–9% among girls.

There are some differences in prevalence of systolic pre-hypertension and BP elevation by ethnic group. For boys, the crude prevalence of SBP elevation is not significantly different between African- American and Caucasian boys (OR= 0.96, p =0.39). However, Hispanic boys have significantly higher prevalent SBP elevation rates than Caucasian boys (OR= 1.49, p<0.001). Both African- American and Hispanic girls have a significantly higher crude prevalence of SBP elevation than Caucasian girls (p≤ 0.003). After adjusting for BMI, Hispanic boys continue to have a significantly higher prevalence of SBP elevation (OR= 1.29, 95% CI = 1.14–1.47, p< 0.001) while African-American boys have a slightly lower prevalence of SBP elevation (OR= 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83–1.00, p=0.06) than Caucasian boys. For systolic pre-hypertension, significant BMI-adjusted differences were found between African-American boys vs. Caucasian boys (OR= 1.21, 95% CI = 1.13–1.30, p< 0.001) but not between Hispanic and Caucasian boys. For girls, no significant differences in SBP elevation or pre-hypertension prevalence among ethnic groups remain after adjusting for BMI. Results for DBP are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Percent of Pre- Hypertensive and Hypertensive Children for DBP by BMI Percentile, Ethnic Group and Gender *

Normal Weight Children Overweight Children Total
Unadjusted

BMI Adjusted
Ethnic
Group
Number
of Visits
Number
Elevated
% Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
Number of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
DBP Hypertension Boys
Caucasian 11,374 494 4.3 3,116 297 9.5 2.29
(1.96 – 2.67)
14,490 791 5.5 1.0 (ref)    1.0 (ref)   
African-
American
7,828 440 5.6 1,804 159 8.8 1.60
(1.32 – 1.94)
9,632 599 6.2 1.16
(1.04–1.30)
0.008 1.13
(1.01–1.26)
0.04
Hispanic 2,011 109 5.4 876 95 10.8 2.10
(1.57 – 2.81)
2,887 204 7.1 1.32
(1.12–1.55)
<0.001 1.19
(1.01–1.40)
0.04
DBP Pre-Hypertension Boys
Caucasian 11,374 598 5.3 3,116 211 6.8 1.39
(1.18 – 1.64)
14,490 809 5.6 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,828 463 5.9 1,804 160 8.9 1.60
(1.32 – 1.95)
9,632 623 6.5 1.18
(1.06–1.32)
0.003 1.15
(1.03–1.29)
0.01
Hispanic 2,011 114 5.7 876 52 5.9 1.11
(0.80–1.55)
2,887 166 5.7 1.05
(0.89–1.25)
0.56 0.97
(0.82–1.15)
0.72
DBP Hypertension Girls
Caucasian 11,210 544 4.9 2,781 332 11.9 2.62
(2.26–3.02)
13,991 876 6.3 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,364 402 5.5 2,410 294 12.2 2.38
(2.03–2.80)
9,774 696 7.1 1.15
(1.04–1.28)
0.008 1.02
(0.92–1.14)
0.72
Hispanic 1,954 89 4.6 898 99 11.0 2.58
(1.89–3.53)
2,852 188 6.6 1.05
(0.88–1.24)
0.59 0.88
(0.74–1.05)
0.15
DBP Pre-Hypertension Girls
Caucasian 11,210 584 5.2 2,781 212 7.6 1.63
(1.39–1.92)
13,991 796 5.7 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,364 389 5.3 2,410 172 7.1 1.49
(1.24–1.80)
9,774 561 5.7 1.02
(0.91–1.14)
0.75 0.96
(0.85–1.07)
0.47
Hispanic 1,954 89 4.6 898 57 6.3 1.53
(1.09–2.15)
2,852 146 5.1 0.90
(0.75–1.08)
0.24 0.82
(0.68–0.99)
0.04
*

Prehypertensive = (≥90th percentile or ≥ 80 mmHg) and < 95th percentile ; hypertensive = ≥ 95th percentile based on quantile regression methods.

Normal weight children = .BMI <85th percentile;

Overweight children=BMI >=85th percentile

§

Based on Proc GENMOD of SAS

Odds ratio for DBP hypertension (pre-hypertension) for overweight vs. normal weight children

For DBP, the BMI-adjusted prevalence of BP elevation is significantly higher for both African-American boys (OR= 1.13, 95% C1= 1.01–1.26, p=0.04) and Hispanic boys (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.01–1.40, p=0.04) compared with Caucasian boys. For girls, no significant difference between ethnic-specific prevalence of DBP elevation is found after adjusting for BMI. For diastolic pre-hypertension, significant BMI- adjusted differences were found for African-American vs. Caucasian boys (OR= 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03–1.29, p=0.01), but not between Hispanic and Caucasian boys. Hispanic girls had a slightly lower BMI- adjusted prevalence of diastolic pre-hypertension than Caucasian girls (OR= 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68–0.99, p=0.04). Results for overall BP elevation and pre-hypertension are given in Table 4.

Table 4.

Percent of Hypertensive and Pre-Hypertensive Children by BMI percentile, Ethnic Group and Gender *

Normal Weight Children Overweight Children Total
Unadjusted

BMI Adjusted
Ethnic
Group
Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
Number
of
Visits
Number
Elevated
% OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
OR
(95% CI)
p-
value§
Hypertension, Boys
Caucasian 11,374 977 8.6 3,116 649 20.8 2.72
(2.43–3.04)
14,490 1,626 11.2 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,828 764 9.8 1,804 365 20.2 2.25
(1.95–2.59)
9,632 1,129 11.7 1.08
(0.99–1.17)
0.08 1.03
(0.95–1.12)
0.49
Hispanic 2,011 209 10.4 876 222 25.3 2.91
(2.35–3.61)
2,887 431 14.9 1.41
(1.25–1.59)
<0.001 1.21
(1.07–1.37)
0.002
Pre-Hypertension, Boys
Caucasian 11,374 1,317 11.6 3,116 505 16.2 1.47
(1.31–1.65)
14,490 1,822 12.6 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,828 1,206 15.4 1,804 362 20.1 1.35
(1.18–1.54)
9,632 1,568 16.3 1.37
(1.27–1.47)
<0.001 1.32
(1.22–1.43)
<0.001
Hispanic 2,011 273 13.6 876 150 17.1 1.30
(1.04–1.62)
2,887 423 14.7 1.24
(1.10–1.39)
<0.001 1.00
(0.88–1.14)
1.00
Hypertension, Girls
Caucasian 11,210 988 8.8 2,781 616 22.2 2.88
(2.57–3.22)
13,991 1,604 11.5 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,364 720 9.8 2,410 568 23.6 2.80
(2.46–3.18)
9,774 1,288 13.2 1.17
(1.08–1.27)
<0.001 1.02
(0.94–1.11)
0.61
Hispanic 1,954 157 8.0 898 208 23.2 3.40
(2.67–4.32)
2,852 365 12.8 1.10
(0.97–1.25)
0.15 0.91
(0.79–1.03)
0.14
Pre-Hypertension, Girls
Caucasian 11,210 624 5.6 2,781 261 9.4 1.76
(1.51–2.05)
13,991 885 6.3 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-
American
7,364 563 7.7 2,410 279 11.6 1.56
(1.33–1.82)
9,774 842 8.6 1.39
(1.26–1.54)
<0.001 1.23
(1.11–1.37)
<0.001
Hispanic 1,954 97 5.0 898 75 8.4 1.72
(1.24–2.38)
2,852 172 6.0 0.96
(0.81–1.14)
0.64 0.80
(0.67–0.95)
0.01
*

Hypertension = ≥ the 95th percentile for either systolic or diastolic BP based on quantile regression methods; pre-hypertension = either systolic or diastolic pre-hypertension and not hypertensive

Normal weight children = BMI <85th percentile.

Overweight children=BMI >=85th percentile

§

Based on Proc GENMOD of SAS

Odds ratio for hypertension (pre-hypertension) for overweight vs. normal weight children

For boys, the crude prevalence of BP elevation is significantly higher for Hispanics vs. Caucasians (OR= 1.41, 95% CI = 1.25–1.59, p< 0.001). After adjusting for BMI, Hispanic boys still have a higher prevalence of BP elevation (OR= 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07–1.37, p=0.002). The BMI- adjusted ethnic differences persisted when children (age 1–12) (OR Hispanic vs. Caucasian boys = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.13–1.72, p=0.002) and adolescents (age 13–17) (OR Hispanic vs. Caucasian boys =1.16, 95% CI=1.00–1.35, p=0.06) were analyzed separately (data not shown). No significant differences are seen between African-American and Caucasian boys either before or after adjusting for BMI. For girls, African-American girls have a significantly higher prevalence of BP elevation than Caucasian girls (OR=1.17, 95% CI= 1.08–1.27, p<0.001) which becomes non-significant after adjusting for BMI (OR= 1.02, 95%, CI= 0.94–1.11, p=0.61). No significant differences are seen between the prevalence of BP elevation for Hispanic vs. Caucasian girls either with or without adjusting for BMI. For overall pre-hypertension there were significant BMI-adjusted differences between African-American vs. Caucasian boys (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.22–1.43, p<0.001) and girls (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.11–1.37, p<0.001). No significant differences were found between Hispanic and Caucasian boys but a slightly decreased risk of pre-hypertension was found for Hispanic vs. Caucasian girls (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95, p=0.01).

An assumption made in Tables 24 is that the differences between the prevalence of BP elevation and pre-hypertension by ethnic group are the same for all levels of BMI. In Table 5, we assess effect modification of ethnicity × overweight status as well as estimate effects of ethnicity separately for normal weight and overweight children (see Statistical Methods for details of modelling).

Table 5.

Effect Modification of the Association between Hypertension, Pre-hypertension* and Ethnicity by Body mass Index, Pediatric Task Force Data

Boys Girls
Normal Weight Overweight Normal Weight Overweight
Ethnic Group OR
(95% CI)
p-value OR
(95% CI)
p-value p, interaction§ OR
(95% CI)
p-value OR
(95% CI)
p-value p, interaction§
Hypertension
Caucasian 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-American 1.14
(1.03–1.27)
0.01 0.90
(0.78–1.05)
0.20 0.01 1.08
(0.97–1.20)
0.14 0.97
(0.85–1.11)
0.69 0.22
Hispanic 1.18
(1.00–1.39)
0.05 1.23
(1.02–1.48)
0.03 0.74 0.84
(0.70–1.01)
0.06 0.96
(0.79–1.16)
0.67 0.31
Pre-hypertension
Caucasian 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref) 1.0 (ref)
African-American 1.28
(1.17–1.39)
<0.001 1.02
(0.83–1.25)
0.83 0.05 1.32
(1.17–1.49)
<0.001 0.99
(0.82–1.21)
0.93 0.01
Hispanic 1.06
(0.92–1.23)
0.41 0.83
(0.64–1.08)
0.17 0.11 0.82
(0.66–1.02)
0.08 0.73
(0.55–0.99)
0.04 0.57
*

Hypertension = ≥ the 95th percentile for either systolic or diastolic BP based on quantile regression methods; pre-hypertension = either systolic or diastolic pre-hypertension and not hypertensive

Normal weight = < 85th percentile; overweight = ≥ 85th percentile

Based on PROC GENMOD of SAS

§

P-value for interaction of ethnicity x Normal weight/overweight

Odds ratio for hypertension (pre-hypertension) for overweight vs. normal weight children

For boys, there was significant effect modification of African- American ethnicity by BMI for both BP elevation (p=0.01) and pre-hypertension (p=0.05). No significant effect modification was found for Hispanic ethnicity by BMI. For normal weight boys (BMI <85th percentile), the prevalence of BP elevation was significantly elevated for both African- American boys (OR=1.14, 95% CI=1.03–1.27, p=0.01) and Hispanic boys (OR= 1.18, 95% CI= 1.00–1.39, p = 0.05). For overweight boys (BMI ≥ 85th percentile), significant effects are seen for Hispanic boys (OR=1.23, 95% CI= 1.02–1.48, p=0.03), but not for African- American boys (OR = 0.90, 95% CI= 0.78–1.05, p=0.20). Similar results are seen for pre-hypertension. For girls, no significant effect modification of ethnicity by BMI was found for BP elevation; however, for pre-hypertension significant effects are seen for normal weight African-American girls vs. Caucasian girls (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.17–1.49, p <0.001), but not for overweight girls (OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.82–1.21, p=0.93, p-interaction =0.01).

Discussion

For overweight children (BMI ≥85th percentile) the odds of pre-hypertension increases about 50% and the odds of BP elevation increases two to three-fold in all race/ethnic groups compared with normal weight children. Ethnic differences in the prevalence of both BP elevation and pre-hypertension were identified even after controlling for BMI. Hispanic boys, both normal weight and overweight, have a significantly higher prevalence of BP elevation (SBP and/or DBP ≥ 95th percentile) compared to Caucasian boys. Hispanic boys also had a significantly higher prevalence of BP elevation when SBP and DBP were considered separately. The prevalence of BP elevation was significantly higher in normal weight African-American boys than their Caucasian counterparts, but was similar in overweight African-American and Caucasian boys. These results persisted when children (age 1–12) and adolescents (age 13–17) were considered separately. Results for pre-hypertension differed somewhat, with a higher prevalence observed for African- American boys, (but not Hispanic boys) as compared with Caucasian boys, especially among normal weight boys. The race/ethnic disparity in BP is much less apparent among girls. Because BMI is higher on average in both African American and Hispanic girls, after adjusting for BMI there is no difference in the prevalence of BP elevation among the three race/ethnic groups.

These results on the prevalence of BP elevation among race/ethnic groups in childhood are different than the data on prevalence of hypertension across race/ethnic groups in adults. The prevalence of obesity among patients with hypertension is much higher than the population prevalence of obesity. In addition to the obesity-hypertension relationship in adults, there appears to be an added effect of race or ethnicity. Similarly, fat patterning as characterized by waist-to-hip ratio does not explain the racial differences in hypertension among adults21. A limitation of the current study is that waist/hip ratio was not available for the Task Force database. Data on adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey3 show that African Americans have the highest prevalence of hypertension at 37.8% in men and 40.3% in women; the prevalence of hypertension in Hispanic men (22.1%) is somewhat lower than Caucasian men at 26.0%. The prevalence of hypertension is nearly equivalent in Caucasian (21%) and Hispanic (21.6%) adult women.

While adult African Americans, both men and women, have the highest prevalence of hypertension, our data show that in children, Hispanic boys have the highest prevalence of elevated BP, although African-American boys have the highest rate of pre-hypertension. Overweight prevalence is highest among Hispanic boys and girls compared to the other race/ethnic groups. But even among the normal weight children the rates of BP elevation are highest among Hispanic boys compared to other race/ethnicity (and sex) groups. When the rates of BP elevation are compared in boys the rates are only slightly higher in African American boys, and this is due to somewhat greater rates of DBP elevation. While the explanation for this race/ethnicity difference between childhood and adulthood is uncertain, these findings could indicate an emerging trend toward increasing risk for hypertension and subsequent cardiovascular disease among Hispanic children as they age into adulthood.

Because the 95th percentile of the BP distribution is used to define BP elevation, the prevalence of high BP is expected to be approximately 5% among normal weight children on the basis of a single measurement in this group1, 2. Our results on the prevalence of both SBP and DBP elevation in normal weight children are close to the expected 5%. The prevalence of both BP elevation and pre-hypertension clearly increase among the overweight groups in all three ethnic groups, both males and females. One limitation of our study is that the data were drawn from several epidemiologic surveys on healthy children mostly from the 1970’s and 1980’s. Thus the data used in this analysis were obtained prior to the current childhood obesity epidemic, that is now well established22. Considering the increasing overall prevalence of obesity in the childhood population and the evidence that the prevalence of BP elevation is higher in obese children, it would be expected that the current prevalence of BP elevation would be higher than the prevalence for the earlier sample that was used in this analysis.

The results reported here are similar to the results of a study to determine the effect of increasing BMI on BP among children in primary care pediatric practices 23. In that study, electronic medical record data were analyzed on over 18,000 children between 2 and 19 years of age. The effect of increasing BMI on both BP level and the prevalence of BP elevation was significant in both males and females, although no analysis by ethnic group was reported. The prevalence of BP elevation among normal weight males and females was also close to 5% with a substantially higher prevalence of BP elevation in the overweight groups. An analysis of the trends in childhood BP from two sequential national cross-sectional studies identified a significant increase in both SBP and DBP. The BP increase was most significant among minority groups, which also have the highest rates of childhood obesity24.

A second limitation of this study is that the ascertainment of pre-hypertension and BP elevation were based on only one BP measurement session. A designation of hypertension or pre-hypertension that uses a single BP measurement generally overestimates the prevalence because BP tends to decrease in subsequent visits due to an accommodation effect and regression to the mean2. In clinical practice, an average SBP or DBP ≥95th percentile obtained on at least three separate visits is required for the clinical diagnosis of hypertension in childhood. Recent reports have demonstrated that, using these criteria, the prevalence of childhood hypertension is from 3.2 to 3.6% 25, 26. Considering a prevalence of 3.2 to 3.6%, hypertension can be considered one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. Moreover, BP data from other studies indicate that a single BP measurement does provide important information regarding risk of future BP elevation and cardiovascular disease. A recent systematic review and analysis of 50 cohort studies that examined BP tracking documented significant BP tracking correlation coefficients from childhood into adulthood27. The strength of the tracking increased with baseline age and decreased with follow-up length. The analysis concluded that data from diverse populations show that the evidence for BP tracking from childhood into adulthood is strong and that early intervention is important. The population evidence is substantial that BP measured in childhood predicts future BP with a tracking coefficient of approximately 0.4 for SBP28.

Perspective

Racial disparities in the prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension have been identified in adults and are also detectable in children. Some of the observed differences appear to be associated with population differences in overweight and obesity between the pediatric and adult populations. Data in this study demonstrate differences in BP elevation by race/ethnicity, particularly for boys after controlling for the effect of BMI, which appear to be different than observed in adults. These differences may portend a different epidemiology of hypertension when these children and adolescents reach adulthood. As the prevalence of childhood obesity increases, the prevalence of high BP in childhood is expected to increase, especially among Hispanics, and contribute to rising rates of premature cardiovascular disease.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Marion McPhee for programming support for the analyses in this paper.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by NIH grant HL 40619.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  • 1.Rosner B, Cook N, Portman R, Daniels S, Falkner B. Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:653–666. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National High Blood Pressure Education program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;114:555–576. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Brown C, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1991. Hypertension. 1995;25:305–313. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.25.3.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosner B, Prineas R, Daniels SR, Loggie J. Blood pressure differences between blacks and whites in relation to body size among US children and adolescents. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:1007–1019. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2000 CDC growth charts: United States. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schachter J, Kuller LH, Perfetti C. Blood pressure during the first five years of life: relation to ethnic group (black or white) and to parental hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:541–553. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fixler DE, Laird WP. Validity of mass blood pressure screening in children. Pediatrics. 1983;72:459–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baron AE, Freyer B, Fixler DE. Longitudinal blood pressures in blacks, whites, and Mexican Americans during adolescence and early adulthood. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:809–817. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Voors AW, Foster TA, Frerichs RR, Webber LS, Berenson GS. Studies of blood pressures in children, ages 5–14 years, in a total biracial community: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation. 1976;54:319–327. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.54.2.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berenson GS, McMahan CA, Voors AW, Webber LS, Srinivasan SR, Frank GC, Foster TA, Blonde CV. Cardiovascular risk factors in children: the early natural history of atherosclerosis and essential hypertension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Berenson GS. Causation of cardiovascular risk factors in children. Perspectives on cardiovascular risk in early life. New York: Raven Press; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gutgesell M, Terrell G, Labarthe D. Pediatric blood pressure: ethnic comparisons in a primary care center. Hypertension. 1981;3:39–47. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.3.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lackland D, Riopel D, Shepard D, Wheller F. Blood pressure and anthropometric measurement results of the South Carolina Dental Health and Pediatric Blood Pressure Study. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Department of Health and Environment Control; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Clarke WR, Schrott HG, Leaverton PE, Connor WE, Lauer RM. Tracking of blood lipids and blood pressures in school age children: the Muscatine study. Circulation. 1978;58:626–634. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lauer RM, Clarke WR, Beaglehole R. Level, trend, and variability of blood pressure during childhood: the Muscatine study. Circulation. 1984;69:242–249. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.2.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McGarvey ST, Zinner SH, Willett WC, Rosner B. Maternal prenatal dietary potassium, calcium, magnesium, and infant blood pressure. Hypertension. 1991;17:218–224. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.17.2.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ, Sinaiko AR. The Sodium-Potassium Blood Pressure Trial in Children. Design, recruitment, and randomization: the children and adolescent blood pressure program. Control Clin Trials. 1991;12:408–423. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(91)90020-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. NHANES 1999–2000. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lackland DT, Orchard TJ, Keil JE, Saunders DE, Jr, Wheeler FC, Adams-Campbell LL, McDonald RH, Knapp RG. Are race differences in the prevalence of hypertension explained by body mass and fat distribution? A survey in a biracial population. Int J Epidemiol. 1992;21:236–245. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.2.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1728–1732. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Falkner B, Gidding SS, Ramirez-Garnica G, Wiltrout SA, West D, Rappaport EB. The relationship of body mass index and blood pressure in primary care pediatric patients. J Pediatr. 2006;148:195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Munter P, He J, Cutler JA, Wildman RP, Whelton PK. Trends in blood pressure among children and adolescents. JAMA. 2004;291:2107–2113. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.17.2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hansen ML, Gunn PW, Kaelber DC. Underdiagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. JAMA. 2007;298:874–879. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McNiece KL, Poffenbarger TS, Turner JL, Franco KD, Sorof JM, Portman RJ. Prevalence of hypertension and pre-hypertension among adolescents. J Pediatr. 2007;150:640–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.052. 644.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Circulation. 2008;117:3171–3180. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.730366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gidding SS. Measuring children's blood pressure matters. Circulation. 2008;117:3163–3164. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.787168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES