Abstract
Hydrodynamic delivery has emerged as the simplest and most effective method for intracellular delivery of membrane impermeable substances in rodents. The system employs a physical force generated by a rapid injection of large volume of solution into a blood vessel to enhance the permeability of endothelium and the plasma membrane of the parenchyma cells to allow delivery of substance into cells. The procedure was initially established for gene delivery in mice and its applications have been extended to the delivery of proteins, oligo nucleotides, genomic DNA and RNA sequences, and small molecules. The focus of this review is on applications of hydrodynamic delivery in pharmaceutical research. Examples are provided to highlight the use of hydrodynamic delivery for study of transcriptional regulation of CYP enzymes, for establishment of animal model for viral infections, and for gene drug discovery and gene function analysis.
Keywords: Hydrodynamic delivery, nonviral gene delivery, oligo nucleotides, gene therapy, siRNA, protein drug discovery
1. Introduction
Hydrodynamic delivery is one of non-viral methods developed originally for intracellular gene delivery but later found applicable to delivery of other macromolecules such as oligo nucleotides, RNA, proteins, and the compounds that are not permeable to cell membrane. The procedure involves a rapid injection of a large volume of solution into a vasculature to facilitate substance transfer into parenchyma cells. It has been used as a research tool for introducing macromolecules into cells to study their biochemical, cell biological, physiological, or/and therapeutic activity in the context of a whole animal. Excellent reviews are available in literature comparing the pros and cons of this technique to other methods of delivery (1–3). The primary focus of this review is to summarize recent progress in applying hydrodynamic delivery to pharmaceutical research. The objective of this article is to inspire the use of hydrodynamic principle to solve pharmaceutical problems.
2. A brief history of hydrodynamic gene delivery
There are three critical elements in hydrodynamic delivery: large volume, high injection speed, and a vasculature for needle placement. Experiments suggesting that intracellular delivery of nucleic acids could be achieved by injection of a large volume of solution were first reported by Budker et al. (4). Using plasmid carrying a reporter gene, the authors demonstrated that about 1% of the hepatocytes were transfected when 1 ml of hypertonic solution was intraportally injected into a mouse with transient occlusion of the hepatic vein. Decreasing the volume by half resulted in a 70-fold reduction in reporter gene expression. It was hypothesized based on these early observations that the hydrostatic pressure resulted from the injection of DNA solution is the driving force for DNA transfer into the hepatocytes. Further support to this hypothesis was generated when the same group of researchers showed successful gene transfer by injecting a large volume of plasmid DNA solution into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or bile duct in mice and rats, and into the bile duct in dogs (5). However, the principle of hydrodynamic delivery conceptualizing the combined effect of large volume and rapid injection was not established until 1999 when Liu et al. (6) and Zhang et al. (7) demonstrated efficient gene delivery in mice by a rapid (5–7s) tail vein injection of plasmid DNA in a volume equal to 8–10% of body weight. Under such experimental conditions, reporter gene expression was detected in all internal organs examined including the lung, heart, spleen, kidney and liver, with the highest level seen in the liver. By a simple tail vein injection of 10 µg of plasmid DNA into a mouse, approximately 30–40% of transfection efficiency in the liver was achieved (6). Such delivery efficiency remains the highest ever achieved in vivo without using a viral carrier.
3. Major features of hydrodynamic gene delivery
Although hydrodynamic gene delivery is well tolerated by rodents, impacts of the procedure on animals for tail vein injection are evident. Immediate after the injection mice become immobile and manifest labored breathing for about 5 min. Rats react more severely and may stop breathing after the injection (8). A gentle massage of the animal abdomen is usually sufficient to stimulate breathing and facilitate the recovery. These acute signs of hydrodynamic impact on cardio function occur and recede quickly (9, 10). A sharp increase of intravascular pressure was also observed and coincided with liver expansion up to 240% of its original size (10). Sinusoidal expansion and disruption of fenestrae soon after hydrodynamic injection into a mouse were also documented (11). Signs of recovery are already apparent in 5 min after the procedure. The heart rate returns to normal range in 2 min (9) while the intravascular pressure (at both the inferior vena cava and portal vein) drops sharply right after the end of the injection and reaches near the basal level within 3 min (10). The expanded liver returned to its original size in 30 min (10) and the disrupted sinusoids return to their original structure and function 24–36 hr after the hydrodynamic delivery (10) and membrane pores in hepatocytes reseal in less than 2 min (9). Serum concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) reach the peak level soon after the injection and drop to normal range 72 hr post injection (6, 11). No apparent long-term complication was identifiable, even in animals receiving 8 weekly hydrodynamic injections (Ma and Liu, unpublished data).
At experimental level, a 27-gauge needle is commonly used for injection in mice, whereas 20- to 24-gauge needle appears appropriate for rats with different body weight. Other sized needles can also be used depending on the injection volume and speed, and the type of blood vessel receiving the injection. When a local injection is performed, occlusion of the blood flow from the area of interest can make a significant difference in gene transfer efficiency (12, 13). Also, the volume administered through the tail vein to rodents is usually 80–100 ml/kg (6, 7, 14). The volume of ∼15 ml/kg has been administered to the isolated liver of the rabbit (15). Hagstrom et al. (12) demonstrated that the administration of permeability enhancers prior to the hydrodynamic injection can decrease the volume required for optimal gene delivery. For maximal delivery efficiency, mice should be injected as rapidly as possible, typically in 3–5 s (6). Instead, rats are typically injected at a rate of 2 ml/s using a power injector although a hand-held syringe can be used (14). The isolated liver of the rabbit is injected at a rate of 15–20 ml/s, which can only be accomplished by a power injector (15). DNA dosage employed ranges from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg, depending on the application. An optimal dose for rats is 3 mg/kg (14), and 7 mg/kg for rabbits (15). For mice the plasmid DNA dose range is 0.5–2.5 mg/kg and no more than 50 µg/injection should be used as higher amount does not appreciably improve the level of transgene product (6). While saline is the most commonly used vehicle for DNA (6), other solutions have also been employed, including Ringers solution (7) and phosphate buffered saline (16). The highest level of gene product reported by a single hydrodynamic injection into the mouse tail vein was 500–1,000 µg per ml of serum (17–19), and 45 µg of cellular protein per gram of liver. It was shown that such level of gene expression was sufficient for restoring the function of blood coagulation in hemophilia mice (20). It is important to point out that the level of transgene expression is significantly influenced by the structure of plasmids used (different promoter and regulatory sequence, inclusion of intron sequences, etc…) and the type of transgene to be expressed. In addition, while organs including the lung, heart, spleen, kidney and liver showed significant reporter gene expression, the liver appears to be the most sensitive organ because the level of reporter gene expression in liver is at least 10,000 fold higher than that of other organs (6,7).
The mechanism of hydrodynamic delivery to liver hepatocytes has been well studied (9, 10, 21). Anatomically, a bolus injection of DNA solution into the tail vein induces immediate congestion in the heart, causing accumulation of the injected solution in the IVC and elevation of intravascular pressure in this venous section. Consequently, DNA solution refluxes into the liver via the hepatic vein, pushing the existing blood in the liver backward toward portal vein, thereby avoiding immediate mixing of DNA with nucleases in the blood. Once entering the liver, the dynamic force carried by the pressurized solution expands the sinusoids, enlarges the liver fenestrae, and permeabilizes the plasma membrane of parenchyma hepatocytes to allow DNA to enter the cells. With continuous cardiac activity the body adapts to the volume load and, over the time, homeostasis is restored.
Because of its physical nature of the hydrodynamic delivery, various molecules have been delivered to hepatocytes in the liver including circular DNA (6, 7), DNA fragments (22), bacterial artificial chromosomes (22), RNA (single or double stranded, synthetic or genomic) (16, 23–27), oligonucleotides (28), proteins (antibodies, enzymes) (9, 29), polymers (29), and small compounds (9, 11). Modified procedures for gene delivery to muscle, kidney, heart and spleen have been reported for hydrodynamic gene delivery in different animal species (for review, see 21).
4. Hydrodynamic delivery for assessing transcription regulation of drug metabolizing enzymes
The study of drug metabolism is essential as it is not only one of the main determinants for drug disposition, biological effects, and toxicity but also the cause of undesirable metabolism-based drug-drug interactions upon exposure to multiple xenobiotics. Expression of CYP genes responsible for drug metabolism is subject to diverse regulatory controls that display tissue-specific, sex-specific, and developmental patterns. Certain CYP genes are constitutively expressed and others are known to be induced by various xenobiotics. Most CYP regulation is at the transcription level although post-transcriptional regulation is also known (30). Valuable information has been obtained about CYP regulation using cell lines or primary culture. However, results from the cell culture studies showed significant variation depending on the experimental conditions employed and the physiological conditions of the tissue samples obtained from the patients (31). This problem can be solved, at least in part, by adopting the system of hydrodynamic gene delivery. For example, reporter plasmids with a human CYP gene promoter cloned at the 5’ end of a reporter gene can be hydrodynamically injected into a mouse liver and the level of reporter gene expression obtained in the presence or absence of inducers/suppressors will be a direct indication of promoter activity. To study the role of nuclear receptor (NR) in regulating transcription regulation, plasmids containing the nuclear receptor gene can be co-injected into animal with the reporter plasmids before the xenobiotic inducers/suppressors are introduced into the same animal.
The pertinent literature offers a few noteworthy examples of the application of the hydrodynamics-based procedure to studies of transcription regulation of CYP enzymes. For instance, Al-Dosari et al. (32) demonstrated the transcription regulation of human CYP2C9 gene by human PXR in mice. The use of different deletion construct of plasmids also allowed the authors to locate the element responsible for PXR-xenobiotic mediated regulation within the promoter of CYP2C9 gene (32). The hydrodynamic delivery has also been employed to establish a real time assay that measures the induced transcription of luciferase genes under the control of 5’-flanking region of a human CYP gene (33). By means of quantitative whole body imaging of bioluminiescence generated by luciferase in transfected animals, Schuetz et al. (33) were able to measure the effects on transcription as it occurred when hydrodynamically transfected mice were administered with pharmaceuticals known to induce the human CYP3A4 and multi drug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene expression. A similar approach was used by Tirona et al. (34) and Zhang et al. (35) to elucidate the transcription regulation of the human CYP3A4 gene by hydrodynamic co-injection of human NRs in mice and by Merrell et al. (36) to study the induction of human CYP2B6 gene by the chemopreventive chemical oltipraz. These examples not only provide evidence that this system easily offers the possibility to set up the most informative biological conditions to study drug metabolism, but it also substantially reduces the time and cost required for gene expression and regulation analysis.
A related application of the hydrodynamics-based procedure concerns the study of NR subcellular distribution. Analysis of factors controlling the intercellular compartmentalization and movement of NRs within cells, especially nuclear/cytoplasmic shuffling, is vital for understanding NR action as transcription regulators of CYP genes. Immunohistochemical analysis is frequently employed to analyze the in vivo distribution of endogenously-expressed NRs. However, this approach suffers from the cross reaction of antibodies against NR isoforms that differ by a few amino acid residues. As a consequence, the existence of identical antibody epitopes shared between multiple NR isoforms may mask the subcellular localization of the specific NR in study. Additional complications arise when in vivo analysis of mutant variant is desired because it requires the time consuming and laborious process to generate transgenic animals. These compounding factors usually are in favour of cell culture-based systems which, however, suffer from the lack of a complex physiological interplay between different cell types and tissues in the context of a whole organism. This is especially true for proteins whose action can be modulated not only by drugs but also by endogenous ligands potentially produced elsewhere within the body. The use of the hydrodynamics-based procedure can easily overcome these daunting drawbacks. In fact, the combined use of confocal microscopy and delivery of fluorescently labelled NR, that can be rapidly visualized, processed and analysed within a short time of the initial injection time, allows to study the subcellular distribution of NRs and to dissect the structural features that govern their subcellular localization in a living organism. So far, this approach has been used to generate important insights into the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) signalling pathway (37–39). It is important to point out that the functions of nuclear receptors appear to be animal species dependent. The animal model selected has to match with the nuclear receptor to be studied.
Hydrodynamics-based procedure can also be used to express human CYP gene(s) in mice or rats to verify or predict the pattern of drug metabolism in clinic. To certain degrees, the system proposed here is more like to generate a humanized organ in a whole animal (e.g. liver by hydrodynamic tail vein injection) with the exception that it is much faster and highly flexible on the type of human CYP gene(s) one wishes to study. In principle, such system is applicable to various toxicological studies as well. For instance, the hydrodynamic tail vein injection of a plasmid vector containing the constitutively activated Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) protein has allowed Meng et al. (40) to elucidate the role of STAT3 in mediating the effects of the Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) in liver repair in mice treated with CCl4.
5. Hydrodynamic delivery for establishing animal model for viral research
Diseases caused by viral infection represent a major type of diseases that could have severe consequences if not properly treated. Although vaccination is very effective in preventing many viral infections, the method for effective treatment of viral diseases such as hepatitis or AIDS is not available. Among the factors limiting the progress in viral research, one is the lack of a convenient animal model that people can work on. For example, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a human hepatotropic DNA virus that causes severe morbidity and mortality. Approximately two billion people worldwide have been infected by HBV (41). Despite significant effort in vaccine development to reduce the risk of HBV transmission, an estimated 378 million people (or 6% of the world population) are chronically infected (42) and at risk of leading to end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Chimpanzees appear to be the only type of animal susceptible to HBV infection (43, 44). However, its large size, high cost, and the ethical consideration severely restrict their usage. The primary reason that HBV cannot be studied in rodents and other animals is because HBV can not infect these animals due to lack of an appropriate receptor on their liver cells. To solve this problem, Yang et al. (45) hydrodynamically injected the HBV genome into a mouse to bypass the requirement of membrane receptor and force an entry (infection) of HBV DNA into the mouse hepatocytes. They showed that viral particles were produced in the hydrodynamically transfected mice and virus persists for at least 81 days in these animals. Similar results were also obtained by hydrodynamic injection of plasmid DNA containing a 1.5-fold-overlength of HBV genome (46). Huang et al. (47) demonstrated that about 40% of the HBV-injected mice carry surface antigen for more than 6 months, and HBV replication intermediates, transcripts and proteins for up to 1 year. The hydrodynamics-based procedure has also been used to generate mouse models for chronic infection of HCV (48, 49) and HDV (50). In principle, the same strategy can be used to generate viral infection in mouse for any human viruses to facilitate viral research and antiviral drug development. Similarly, any other disease model can also be created in rodents by expressing the disease-causing gene(s) by hydrodynamic injection of plasmids carrying the disease causing gene(s).
6. Hydrodynamic delivery for gene drug discovery
The advantage for the use of hydrodynamic gene delivery to study therapeutic functions of a gene is obvious. A candidate gene in plasmid or DNA fragment with regulatory sequence for its expression can be hydrodynamically injected into an animal (mouse or rat) carrying a target disease. The therapeutic effect of the gene product (protein or RNA) on disease progression or regression is then evaluated with time. Similar to a conventional drug study, repeated gene transfer, different amount of DNA, and different regiment can be used to maximize the therapeutic outcome. Compared to conventional biotech approach that relies on purified protein for therapeutic assessment, hydrodynamics-based protocol makes the liver as the manufacture site for therapeutic proteins, eliminating the steps and cost for protein production and characterization. In addition, since therapeutic evaluation is directly conducted in animals, no issues about formulation development and bioavailability need to be addressed.
Numerous examples are available demonstrating the effectiveness of hydrodynamic delivery for identifying gene(s) with therapeutic activity. Although many of the studies focused on genetic diseases, the underlying principle is the same, i.e. therapeutic activity of a gene sequence can be evaluated in a diseased animal by hydrodynamic injection of the gene sequence properly oriented in an expression vector. Nakamura et al. (51) demonstrated that the hydrodynamics-based transfection of the plasmid pKSCX-α-Gal A, carrying a human alpha-galactosidase A gene, partially reduces systemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in Fabry mice. Hydrodynamic injection of plasmid carrying FIX gene into hemophilia mice resulted in sufficient FIX protein and cure of disease (20). Chen and Woo demonstrated a complete cure of phenylketonuria (PKU) in PKU mice by hydrodynamic injection of plasmid containing phenylalanine hydroxylase gene (52). Additional examples include the use of hydrodynamic gene delivery to demonstrate therapeutic effect of the human growth hormone gene in hypophysectomized mice (53); arylsulfatase A and formylglycine-generating enzyme genes for metachromatic leukodystrophy (54); α-L-iduronidase gene for mucopolysaccharidosis I disease (55); short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase gene for short chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (56); α-1 antitrypsin gene for treatment of alpha 1 deficiency (17, 19); insulin gene for diabetes (57); hepatocyte growth factor gene for diabetic nephropathy (58); uncoupling protein 1 gene (59) and leptin or ciliary neurotrophic factor genes 60) for obesity; interleukin (IL)-22-immunoglobulin (61), IL-13-immunoglobulin (62) and IL-1 receptor antagonist-immunoglobulin (63) fusion genes for myocarditis; IL-10 gene for glomerulonephritis (64); paraoxonase gene for reducing organophosphate toxicity (65); endo-beta-galactosidase C (66) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4-immunoglobulin (67) genes for prolonging the survival of xenotransplantation; eritropoietin gene for hypoxic-ischemia encephalopathy (68); nitric oxide synthase-2 gene for liver regeneration (69); and cytokine genes for cancer treatment (70–83).
In addition, hydrodynamic gene delivery has also been employed to define gene functions in whole animal. For example, the hepatocyte growth factor receptor proto-oncogene MET, which encodes a tyrosine protein kinase, is believed to be involved in development of hepatocellular adenomas. Its oncolytical activity was demonstrated when a MET plasmid was co-injected into mouse with plasmid carrying ΔN90-CTHNB1 (constitutively active version of β-catenin) or DNHNF1α (a dominant-negative hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α version of TCF1) gene. Approximately 74% of injected mice developed hepatocellular adenomas, comparing to none in animals injected with MET, ΔN90-CTHNB1 or DNHNF1α alone (84).
Practically, any genomic sequence (coding and non-coding) or its mutated form can be cloned and studied for its function in the liver of either a mouse or rat employing the technique of hydrodynamic tail vein injection.
7. Conclusions and future perspectives
The goal of any delivery method is to transfer molecules to desired cells and tissues with sufficient efficiency and minimal toxicity. In this regard, the hydrodynamics-based delivery system has established itself as the leading strategy to perform in vivo studies. In fact, its transient and minimal toxicity together with unprecedented delivery efficiency has made the hydrodynamics-based transfection the most desirable procedure to study the function of coding or non-coding sequences in whole animals. Also, its simplicity and flexibility offer great convenience for the in vivo intracellular delivery of DNA, RNA, proteins or other membrane-impermeable compound. For gene delivery studies, the use of tissue specific promoter to drive transgene expression could limit the site of gene expression to a selected tissue/organ. Although similar to many physical methods such as microinjection, particle bombardment and electroporation, the hydrodynamic delivery is actually different from these device-based methods because it doesn’t require any sophisticated equipment. Other than a syringe, saline and the test substance, no other additional materials are needed. Since its establishment in 1999, an ever increasing number of laboratories have thus chosen and adapted this method for their studies in rodents requiring intracellular delivery of membrane-impermeable substances. In this context, it is worth noting that the first demonstration of effective gene knockdown by small interfering RNA in vivo was conducted by using the hydrodynamics-based delivery (27).
Perhaps the greatest benefit from the hydrodynamic delivery procedure to date is the potential to reduce the cost associated with research and discovery of regular and protein drugs. This is noteworthy especially in the field of the pharmaceutical research, considering that on average every new drug requires 12–15 years to reach the patient and costs $400–650 million (85). Most of the unmet goals that characterize this field of research have been already filled by other strategies or experimental procedures (e.g. transgenic animals, cell lines, etc…). However, it should be pointed out that the hydrodynamic delivery offers a quicker and more convenient way to conduct in vivo studies. When the hydrodynamics-based delivery is employed, there’s no need to go through the difficulty and time-consuming process of generating a transgenic animal or use less reliable cell-based assays. In fact, the procedure offers the possibility to draw reliable conclusions and solid results with a simple injection and under the most informative setting, e.g. in a whole animal where all of the physiological processes are recapitulated. Also, no expensive devices or specialized expertise, which might not be available to most investigators, is required. As addressed in the previous paragraphs, the elucidation of NR pathways and study of drug metabolism under humanized conditions, the establishment of human disease models in animals, the unravelling of gene function by delivery of siRNA and discovery of gene drug are some of the pharmaceutical research-related fields which are already benefiting from the advantages of the hydrodynamic delivery.
Despite the fact that the physical nature of intrahepatic gene delivery following hydrodynamic injection has been firmly established, many other aspects of the procedure still have to be explored. For example, gene transfer into cells in organs other than the liver needs to be elucidated as there’s evidence that the hydrodynamic delivery is applicable not only to fenestrated but also continuous capillaries (7, 12). In addition, feasibility to perform the hydrodynamic procedure in large animals has been demonstrated using an image-guided hydrodynamic procedure using a computer controlled injection device (86). It is foreseeable that in the near future, the pharmaceutical research will take a great advantage of the efficiency of the hydrodynamic gene delivery procedure not only for drug discovery but also for treatment of human diseases.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01EB007357 and RO1 HL098295. B. Bonamassa is recipient of the Rotary Foundation Ambassadorial Scholarship for the 2009/2010 academic year.
References
- 1.Gao X, Kim KS, Liu D D. Nonviral gene delivery: what we know and what is next. AAPS J. 2007;9:E92–E104. doi: 10.1208/aapsj0901009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herweijer H, Wolff JA. Gene therapy progress and prospects: hydrodynamic gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2007;14:99–107. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kobayashi N, Nishikawa M, Takakura Y. The hydrodynamics-based procedure for controlling the pharmacokinetics of gene medicines at whole body, organ and cellular levels. Drug. Adv. Deliv. Rev. 2005;57:713–731. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Budker V, Zhang G, Knechtle S, Wolff JA. Naked DNA delivered intraportally expresses efficiently in hepatocytes. Gene Ther. 1996;3:593–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang G, Vargo D, Budker V, Armstrong N, Knechtle S, Wolff JA. Expression of naked plasmid DNA injected into the afferent and efferent vessels of rodent and dog livers. Hum. Gene Ther. 1997;8:1763–1772. doi: 10.1089/hum.1997.8.15-1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu F, Song Y, Liu D. Hydrodynamics-based transfection in animals by systemic administration of plasmid DNA. Gene Ther. 1999;6:1258–1266. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang G, Budker V, Wolff JA. High levels of foreign gene expression in hepatocytes after tail vein injections of naked plasmid DNA. Hum. Gene Ther. 1999;10:1735–1737. doi: 10.1089/10430349950017734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hodges BL, Scheule RK. Hydrodynamic delivery of DNA. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2003;3:911–918. doi: 10.1517/14712598.3.6.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang G, Gao X, Song YK, Vollmer R, Stolz DB, Gasiorowski JZ, Dean DA, Liu D. Hydroporation as the mechanism of hydrodynamic delivery. Gene Ther. 2004;11:675–682. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Suda T, Gao X, Stolz DB, Liu D. Structural impact of hydrodynamic injection on mouse liver. Gene Ther. 2007;14:129–137. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kobayashi N, Nishikawa M, Hirata K, Takakura Y. Hydrodynamics-based procedure involves transient hyperpermeability in the hepatic cellular membrane: implication of a nonspecific process in efficient intracellular gene delivery. J. Gene Med. 2004;6:584–592. doi: 10.1002/jgm.541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hagstrom JE, Hegge J, Zhang G, Noble M, Budker V, Lewis DL, Herweijer H, Wolff JA. A facile nonviral method for delivering genes and siRNAs to skeletal muscle of mammalian limbs. Mol. Ther. 2004;10:386–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang G, Budker V, Williams P, Subbotin V, Wolff JA. Efficient expression of naked DNA delivered intraarterially to limb muscles of nonhuman primates. Hum. Gene Ther. 2001;12:427–438. doi: 10.1089/10430340150504046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maruyama H, Higuchi N, Nishikawa Y, Kameda S, Iino N, Kazama JJ, Takahashi N, Sugawa M, Hanawa H, Tada N, Miyazaki J, Gejyo F. High-level expression of naked DNA delivered to rat liver via tail vein injection. J. Gene Med. 2002;4:333–341. doi: 10.1002/jgm.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eastman SJ, Baskin KM, Hodges BL, Chu G, Gates A, Dreusicke R, Anderson S, Scheule RK. Development of catheter-based procedures for transducing the isolated rabbit liver with plasmid DNA. Hum. Gene Ther. 2002;13:2065–2077. doi: 10.1089/10430340260395910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McCaffrey AP, Ohashi K, Meuse L, Shen S, Lancaster AM, Lukavsky PJ, Sarnow P, Kay MA. Determinants of hepatitis C translational initiation in vitro, in cultured cells and mice. Mol. Ther. 2002;5:676–684. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang G, Song YK, Liu D. Long-term expression of human alpha1-antitrypsin gene in mouse liver achieved by intravenous administration of plasmid DNA using a hydrodynamics-based procedure. Gene Ther. 2000;7:1344–1349. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stoll SM, Sclimenti CR, Baba EJ, Meuse L, Kay MA, Calos MP. Epstein-Barr virus/ human vector provides high-level, long-term expression of alpha1-antitrypsin in mice. Mol. Ther. 2001;4:122–129. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2001.0429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Alino SF, Crespo F, Dasi A. Long-term therapeutic levels of human alpha-1 antitrypsin in plasma after hydrodynamic injection of nonviral DNA. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1672–1679. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miao CH, Thompson AR, Loeb K, Ye X. Long-term and therapeutic-level hepatic gene expression of human factor IX after naked plasmid transfer in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2001;3:947–957. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2001.0333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Suda T, Liu D. Hydrodynamic gene delivery: its principles and applications. Mol. Ther. 2007;15:2063–2069. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magin-Lachmann C, Kotzamanis G, D'Aiuto L, Cooke H, Huxley C, Wagner E. In vitro and in vivo delivery of intact BAC DNA -- comparison of different methods. J. Gene Med. 2004;6:195–209. doi: 10.1002/jgm.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chang J, Sigal LJ, Lerro A, Taylor J. Replication of the human hepatitis delta virus genome is initiated in mouse hepatocytes following intravenous injection of naked DNA or RNA sequences. J Virol. 2001;75:3469–3473. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.7.3469-3473.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Giladi H, Ketzinel-Gilad M, Rivkin L, Felig Y, Nussbaum O, Galun E. Small interfering RNA inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in mice. Mol. Ther. 2003;8:769–776. doi: 10.1016/s1525-0016(03)00244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kobayashi N, Matsui Y, Kawase A, Hirata K, Miyagishi M, Taira K, Nishikawa M, Takakura Y. Vector-based in vivo RNA interference: dose- and time-dependent suppression of transgene expression. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004;308:688–693. doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.059931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Layzer JM, McCaffrey AP, Tanner AK, Huang Z, Kay MA, Sullenger BA. In vivo activity of nuclease-resistant siRNAs. RNA. 2004;10:766–771. doi: 10.1261/rna.5239604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Pham TT, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ, Kay MA. RNA interference in adult mice. Nature. 2002;418:38–39. doi: 10.1038/418038a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McCaffrey AP, Meuse L, Karimi M, Contag CH, Kay MA. A potent and specific morpholino antisense inhibitor of hepatitis C translation in mice. Hepatology. 2003;38:503–508. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kobayashi N, Kuramoto T, Yamaoka K, Hashida M, Takakura Y. Hepatic uptake and gene expression mechanisms following intravenous administration of plasmid DNA by conventional and hydrodynamics-based procedures. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001;297:853–860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nakata K, Tanaka Y, Nakano T, Adachi T, Tanaka H, Kaminuma T, Ishikawa T. Nuclear receptor-mediated transcriptional regulation in Phase I, II, and III xenobiotic metabolizing systems. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2006;21:437–457. doi: 10.2133/dmpk.21.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Donato MT, Lahoz A, Castell JV, Gómez-Lechón MJ. Cell lines: a tool for in vitro drug metabolism studies. Curr. Drug. Metab. 2008;9:1–11. doi: 10.2174/138920008783331086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Al-Dosari MS, Knapp JE, Liu D. Activation of human CYP2C9 promoter and regulation by CAR and PXR in mouse liver. Mol. Pharm. 2006;3:322–328. doi: 10.1021/mp0500824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schuetz E, Lan L, Yasuda K, Kim R, Kocarek TA, Schuetz J, Strom S. Development of a real-time in vivo transcription assay: application reveals pregnane X receptor-mediated induction of CYP3A4 by cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002;62:439–445. doi: 10.1124/mol.62.3.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tirona RG, Lee W, Leake BF, Lan LB, Cline CB, Lamba V, Parviz F, Duncan SA, Inoue Y, Gonzalez FJ, Schuetz EG, Kim RB. The orphan nuclear receptor HNF4alpha determines PXR- and CAR-mediated xenobiotic induction of CYP3A4. Nat. Med. 2003;9:220–224. doi: 10.1038/nm815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang W, Purchio A, Chen K, Burns SM, Contag CH, Contag PR. In vivo activation of the human CYP3A4 promoter in mouse liver and regulation by pregnane X receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003;65:1889–1896. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00188-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Merrell MD, Jackson JP, Augustine LM, Fisher CD, Slitt AL, Maher JM, Huang W, Moore DD, Zhang Y, Klaassen CD, Cherrington NJ. The Nrf2 activator oltipraz also activates the constitutive androstane receptor. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008;36:1716–1721. doi: 10.1124/dmd.108.020867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zelko I, Sueyoshi T, Kawamoto T, Moore R, Negishi M. The peptide near the C terminus regulates receptor CAR nuclear translocation induced by xenochemicals in mouse liver. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21:2838–2846. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.8.2838-2846.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sueyoshi T, Moore R, Pascussi JM, Negishi M. Direct expression of fluorescent protein-tagged nuclear receptor CAR in mouse liver. Methods Enzymol. 2002;357:205–213. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)57680-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sueyoshi T, Moore R, Sugatani J, Matsumura Y, Negishi M. PPP1R16A, the membrane subunit of protein phosphatase 1beta, signals nuclear translocation of the nuclear receptor constitutive active/androstane receptor. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008;73:1113–1121. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.042960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Meng Z, Wang Y, Wang L, Jin W, Liu N, Pan H, Liu L, Wagman L, Forman BM, Huang W. FXR regulates liver repair after CCl4-induced toxic injury. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010;24:886–897. doi: 10.1210/me.2009-0286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shepard CW, Simard EP, Finelli L, Fiore AE, Bell BP. Hepatitis B virus infection: epidemiology and vaccination. Epidemiol. Rev. 2006;28:112–125. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxj009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zanetti AR, Van Damme P, Shouval D. The global impact of vaccination against hepatitis B: A historical overview. Vaccine. 2008;26:6266–6273. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bertoni R, Sette A, Sidney J, Guidotti LG, Shapiro M, Purcell R, Chisari FV. Human class I supertypes and CTL repertoires extend to chimpanzees. J. Immunol. 1998;161:4447–4455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Will H, Cattaneo R, Koch HG, Darai G, Schaller H, Schellekens H, van Eerd PM, Deinhardt F. Cloned HBV DNA causes hepatitis in chimpanzees. Nature. 1982;299:740–742. doi: 10.1038/299740a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang PL, Althage A, Chung J, Chisari FV. Hydrodynamic injection of viral DNA: a mouse model of acute hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:13825–13830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202398599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Suzuki T, Takehara T, Ohkawa K, Ishida H, Jinushi M, Miyagi T, Sasaki Y, Hayashi N. Intravenous injection of naked plasmid DNA encoding hepatitis B virus (HBV) produces HBV and induces humoral immune response in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003;300:784–788. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02889-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Huang LR, Wu HL, Chen PJ, Chen DS. An immunocompetent mouse model for the tolerance of human chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:17862–17867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608578103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang Q, Contag CH, Ilves H, Johnston BH, Kaspar RL. Small hairpin RNAs efficiently inhibit hepatitis C IRES-mediated gene expression in human tissue culture cells and a mouse model. Mol. Ther. 2005;12:562–568. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim SI, Shin D, Lee H, Ahn B, Yoon Y, Kim M. Targeted delivery of siRNA against hepatitis C virus by apolipoprotein A-I-bound cationic liposomes. J. Hepat. 2009;50:479–488. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chang J, Sigal LJ, Lerro A, Taylor J. Replication of the human hepatitis delta virus genome is initiated in mouse hepatocytes following intravenous injection of naked DNA or RNA sequences. J. Virol. 2001;75:3469–3473. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.7.3469-3473.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nakamura G, Maruyama H, Ishii S, Shimotori M, Kameda S, Kono T, Miyazaki J, Kulkarni AB, Gejyo F. Naked plasmid DNA-based alpha-galactosidase A gene transfer partially reduces systemic accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in Fabry mice. Mol. Biotechnol. 2008;38:109–119. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-9008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen L, Woo SL. Complete and persistent phenotypic correction of phenylketonuria in mice by site-specific genome integration of murine phenylalanine hydroxylase cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:15581–15586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503877102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 53.Sondergaard M, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Flyvbjerg A, Jensen TG. Normalization of growth in hypophysectomized mice using hydrodynamic transfer of the human growth hormone gene. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;285:E427–E432. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00573.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Takakusaki Y, Hisayasu S, Hirai Y, Shimada T. Coexpression of formylglycine-generating enzyme is essential for synthesis and secretion of functional arylsulfatase A in a mouse model of metachromatic leukodystrophy. Hum. Gene Ther. 2005;16:929–936. doi: 10.1089/hum.2005.16.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Camassola M, Braga LM, Delgado-Canedo A, Dalberto TP, Matte U, Burin M, M Nonviral in vivo gene transfer in the mucopolysaccharidosis I murine model. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2005;28:1035–1043. doi: 10.1007/s10545-005-0070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Holm DA, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Simonsen H, Gregersen N, Bolund L, Jensen TG. Expression of short-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SCAD) proteins in the liver of SCAD deficient mice after hydrodynamic gene transfer. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2003;78:250–258. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7192(03)00038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.He CX, Shi D, Wu WJ, Ding YF, Feng DM, Lu B, B Insulin expression in livers of diabetic mice mediated by hydrodynamics-based administration. World J. Gastroenterol. 2004;10:567–572. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i4.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dai C, Yang J, Bastacky S, Xia J, Li Y, Liu Y. Intravenous administration of hepatocyte growth factor gene ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in mice. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:2637–2647. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000139479.09658.EE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gonzalez Muniesa P, Milagro FI, Campion J, Martinez JA. Reduction in energy efficiency induced by expression of the uncoupling protein, UCP1, in mouse liver mitochondria. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2006;17:591–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jiang J, Yamato E, Miyazaki J. Long-term control of food intake and body weight by hydrodynamics-based delivery of plasmid DNA encoding leptin or CNTF. J. Gene Med. 2003;5:977–983. doi: 10.1002/jgm.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chang H, Hanawa H, Liu H, Yoshida T, Hayashi M, Watanabe R. Hydrodynamic-based delivery of an interleukin-22-Ig fusion gene ameliorates experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats. J. Immunol. 2006;177:3635–3643. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Elnaggar R, Hanawa H, Liu H, Yoshida T, Hayashi M, Watanabe R. The effect of hydrodynamics-based delivery of an IL-13-Ig fusion gene for experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats and its possible mechanism. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005;35:1995–2005. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Liu H, Hanawa H, Yoshida T, Elnaggar R, Hayashi M, Watanabe R. Effect of hydrodynamics-based gene delivery of plasmid DNA encoding interleukin-1 receptor antagonist-Ig for treatment of rat autoimmune myocarditis: possible mechanism for lymphocytes and noncardiac cells. Circulation. 2005;111:1593–1600. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000160348.75918.CA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Higuchi N, Maruyama H, Kuroda T, Kameda S, Iino N, Kawachi H. Hydrodynamics-based delivery of the viral interleukin-10 gene suppresses experimental crescentic glomerulonephritis in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Gene Ther. 2003;10:1297–1310. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fu AL, Wang YX, Sun MJ. Naked DNA prevents soman intoxication. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;328:901–905. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.12.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Miki Y, Maruyama S, Liu D, Kobayashi T, Sato F, Shimizu H. In vivo gene transfer of endo-beta-galactosidase C removes alphaGal antigen on erythrocytes and endothelial cells of the organs. Xenotransplantation. 2004;11:444–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2004.00163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Inoue S, Hakamata Y, Kaneko M, Kobayashi E. Gene therapy for organ grafts using rapid injection of naked DNA: application to the rat liver. Transplantation. 2004;77:997–1003. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000118404.66106.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang CH, Liang CL, Huang LT, Liu JK, Hung PH, Sun A. Single intravenous injection of naked plasmid DNA encoding erythropoietin provides neuroprotection in hypoxia-ischemia rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004;314:1064–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zeini M, Hortelano S, Traves PG, Gomez Valades AG, Pujol A, Perales JC. Assessment of a dual regulatory role for NO in liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy: protection against apoptosis and retardation of hepatocyte proliferation. FASEB J. 2005;19:995–997. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3233fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Barnett FH, Scharer-Schuksz M, Wood M, Yu X, Wagner TE, Friedlander M. Intra-arterial delivery of endostatin gene to brain tumors prolongs survival and alters tumor vessel ultrastructure. Gene Ther. 2004;11:1283–1289. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tada M, Hatano E, Taura K, Nitta T, Koizumi N, Ikai I. High volume hydrodynamic injection of plasmid DNA via the hepatic artery results in a high level of gene expression in rat hepatocellular carcinoma induced by diethylnitrosamine. J. Gene Med. 2006;8:1018–1026. doi: 10.1002/jgm.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kobayashi N, Kuramoto T, Chen S, Watanabe Y, Takakura Y. Therapeutic effect of intravenous interferon gene delivery with naked plasmid DNA in murine metastasis models. Mol. Ther. 2002;6:737–744. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yazawa H, Murakami T, Li HM, Back T, Kurosaka K, Suzuki Y. Hydrodynamics-based gene delivery of naked DNA encoding fetal liver kinase-1 gene effectively suppresses the growth of pre-existing tumors. Cancer Gene Ther. 2006;13:993–1001. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sato A, Ohtsuki M, Hata M, Kobayashi E, Murakami T. Antitumor activity of IFN-lambda in murine tumor models. J. Immunol. 2006;176:7686–7694. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.12.7686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kim KS, Park YS. Antitumor effects of angiostatin K1-3 and endostatin genes coadministered by the hydrodynamics-based transfection method. Oncol Res. 2005;15:343–350. doi: 10.3727/096504005776449707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Takehara T, Uemura A, Tatsumi T, Suzuki T, Kimura R, Shiotani A. Natural killer cell-mediated ablation of metastatic liver tumors by hydrodynamic injection of IFNalpha gene to mice. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;120:1252–1260. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yonenaga Y, Mori A, Fujimoto A, Nagayama S, Tachibana T, Onodera H. The administration of naked plasmid DNA into the liver induces antitumor innate immunity in a murine liver metastasis model. J. Gene Med. 2007;9:299–307. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kitajima M, Tsuyama Y, Miyano-Kurosaki N, Takaku H. Anti-tumor effect of intravenous TNFalpha gene delivery naked plasmid DNA using a hydrodynamics-based procedure. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2005;24:647–650. doi: 10.1081/ncn-200060136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chen HW, Lee YP, Chung YF, Shih YV, Tsai JP, Tao MH. Inducing long-term survival with lasting anti-tumor immunity in treating B cell lymphoma by a combined dendritic cell-based and hydrodynamic plasmid-encoding IL-12 gene therapy. Int. Immunol. 2003;15:427–435. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxg045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Wang G, Tschoi M, Spolski R, Lou Y, Ozaki K, Feng C. In vivo antitumor activity of interleukin 21 mediated by natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:9016–9022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Wen J, Matsumoto K, Taniura N, Tomioka D, Nakamura T. Hepatic gene expression of NK4, an HGF-antagonist/angiogenesis inhibitor, suppresses liver metastasis and invasive growth of colon cancer in mice. Cancer Gene Ther. 2004;11:419–430. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ortaldo JR, Winkler-Pickett RT, Bere EW, Watanabe M, Jr, Murphy MJ, Wiltrout RH. In vivo hydrodynamic delivery of cDNA encoding IL-2: rapid, sustained redistribution, activation of mouse NK cells, and therapeutic potential in the absence of NKT cells. J. Immunol. 2005;175:693–699. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Neal ZC, Bates MK, Albertini MR, Herweijer H. Hydrodynamic limb vein delivery of a xenogeneic DNA cancer vaccine effectively induces antitumor immunity. Mol. Ther. 2007;15:422–430. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tward AD, Jones KD, Yant S, Cheung ST, Fan ST, Chen X, Kay MA, Wang R, Bishop JM. Distinct pathways of genomic progression to benign and malignant tumors of the liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14771–14776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706578104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Collins MA, Shaw I, Billington DC. Driving drug discovery and patient therapy via the encapsulation and fusion of knowledge. Drug Des. Discov. 1999;16:181–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Suda T, Suda K, Liu D. Computer-assisted hydrodynamic gene delivery. Mol. Ther. 2008;16:1098–1104. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
