Abstract
α-C-glucopyranosides and mannopyranosides are obtained in 65–85% yields from 4,6-O-benzylidene-protected glucosyl and mannosyl thioglycosides bearing ester functionality at the 3-O-position by coupling reaction with C-nucleophiles on activation with diphenyl sulfoxide, 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylpyrimidine, and trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride.
Introduction
For some time our laboratory has been interested in the stereocontrolled formation of O-glycosides, in particular the challenging β-mannopyranosides1 and the α-sialosides.2 In the mannopyranoside field our extensive studies are consistent with a mechanistic picture in which an α-glycosyl triflate formed in situ serves as a reservoir for a series of transient contact (CIP) and solvent separated (SSIP) ion pairs (Scheme 1). The CIP, in which the α-face of the glycosyl oxacarbenium ion is shielded by the proximal triflate anion, is viewed as the source of the β-mannopyranosides while the SSIP, in whose chemistry the anomeric effect plays a dominant role, is the precursor to the α-mannopyranosides.1b While most of our work has focused on the formation of the O-glycosides, we were recently stimulated to investigate briefly C-glycoside formation. Working with a series of 4,6-O-benzylidene protected manno- and glucopyranoside donors bearing non-participating benzyl ethers at the 2- and 3-positions we found that simple allylsilanes and stannanes and silyl enol ethers as C-glycosyl acceptors gave the same overall trends as that of typical O-glycosyl acceptors.3 Namely, high β-selectivity was observed in the mannose series while the converse was true in the glucose series. We concluded that there is a strong commonality of mechanism between the formation of C- and O-glycosides under the conditions practiced in our laboratory.
Scheme 1.
Mechanism of Benzylidene-directed Mannosylation
Extending this study, as we report here, we have now directed attention at the intriguing case of the 4,6-O-benzylidene protected mannosyl donors bearing an acyl group at the 3-position and find, as for O-glycoside formation,4 that this switch of a single protecting group results in a complete reversal of selectivity with the α-glycosides now being the predominant products. We are therefore reinforced in our notion of a common mechanism for C- and O-glycoside formation even if it is not clear at present how the group at O3 exerts such a major influence on the stereochemical outcome of these reactions. Also of interest and reported here is the effect of other groups at the 3-position, notably a sulfonyl ester5 and a bulky silyl ether,6 on the stereochemical outcome of C-glycosylation reactions in the 4,6-O-benzylidene protected mannopyranose series.
Results and Discussion
The thioglycosides 1–4, 6 and 7 were prepared as described in the literature,7 and the alcohols 1 and 7 were further converted to the derivatives 5 and 8 by standard techniques as described in the supporting information. Compound 2 was oxidized with m-CPBA with the anticipated high stereoselectivity to the corresponding sulfoxide 9.8
With the various donors in hand a series of C-glycoside forming reactions, with acceptors of varying nucleophilicity,9 were conducted as reported in Table 1 with activation either by the BSP/TTBP/Tf2O cocktail,10 or by the DPSO/TTBP/Tf2O mixture recommended for the activation of thioglycosides by van Boom and coworkers, or for the sulfoxide, by Tf2O/TTBP.11
Table 1.
Formation of C-glycosides from the 3-O-carboxylates and other 3-O-Derivatives
| Entry | Donor | Acceptor | N-value | Coupled Product | Isolated Yielda | α:β Ratiob |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
67% 86%d 81%e |
13:1 7:1c 3.52:1e |
| 2 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
71% | α only |
| 3 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
76% | α only |
| 4 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
79% 61%e |
α only |
| 5 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
65% | 13:1 |
| 6 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
69% | α only |
| 7 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
74% | α only |
| 8 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
84% | α only |
| 9 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
73% 45%e |
α only |
| 10 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
76% | α only |
| 11 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
86% | α only |
| 12 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
44% | 7.8:1 |
| 13 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
59% | α only |
| 14 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
63% | α only |
| 15 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
18a, 41% | 18a, α only |
| 18b, 21% | 18b, α only | |||||
| 16 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
53% | 1:4 |
| 17 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
65% | 1:5.5 |
| 18 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
68% | 1:19 |
| 19 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
76% | β only |
| 20 |
|
|
6.2 |
|
81% | β only |
Isolated yields after column chromatography.
Ratios were determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of crude reaction mixtures.
After addition of the nucleophile, the reaction mixture was slowly (~ 2 h) warmed up to room temperature and quenched at the same temperature.
After addition of the nucleophile, the reaction mixture was immediately (~5 min) warmed up to room temperature and quenched at the same temperature.
BSP was used instead of DPSO.
The results of these reactions, for all donors carrying a carboxylate ester, carbonate, or carbamate group at O-3, correspond to the trend observed for the formation of O-glycosides under closely related reaction conditions. Thus, in the mannose series (Entries 1-12) all reactions were highly α-selective as has been repeatedly found for the formation of the O-glycosides. As illustrated (Table 1, entry 1) for the somewhat less nucleophilic allylsilane the reactions are temperature sensitive giving reduced selectivity on warming to higher temperatures before completion. In the glucose series (Table 1, entries 13-15) the C-glycosylation reactions were also highly α-selective somewhat in keeping with the formation of O-glycosides from other glucopyranosyl donors bearing esters at O-3 and ethers at O-2. In keeping with the work of Kim on the formation of O-glycosides,5 a 3-O-sulfonyl mannopyranosyl donor also was found to be moderately β-selective in its reactions with allyltrimethylsilane and allyltributylstannnane (Table 1, entries 16 and 17).
The 3-O-silyl mannopyranosyl donor 5, whose use typically results in poorly selective O-glycosylation reactions,6,12 gave excellent β-selectivity with each of three nucleophiles; allyltrimethylsilane, allyltributylstannane, and acetophenone trimethylsilyl enol ether (Table 1, entries 18 - 20).
With respect to the assignment of anomeric configuration, all C-glycosides bearing an acetyl group at the 3-position were converted by saponification and benzylation to the corresponding known3a 3-O-benzyl ethers. NOE measurements (supporting information) were employed to assign the configuration of the 3-O-silyl ethers 20 and 21 whose configuration was confirmed further by chemical correlation with compounds 10 and 12 (Scheme 2). In particular, it is noteworthy that desilylation of 21 derived from the coupling reaction (Table 1, entry 20) followed by acetylation gave the 3-O-acetyl derivative 12β that differed from the sample 12α obtained from the coupling process (Table 1, entry 4), thereby making both stereoisomers of 12 available for comparison of their spectral data. On the other hand, saponification of 12α followed by silylation resulted in the formation of 21 with inversion of configuration at the anomeric center (Scheme 2). This inversion presumably takes place by a process involving enolization, β-elinination, and finally readdition as described previously for related C-glycosides prepared by Wittig olefination of anomeric hemiacetals.13 As a general rule the equatorial β-C-glycosides had anomeric chemical shifts in the region δH(CDCl3) 3.5-3.6, and, in silica gel chromatography, were less polar than the corresponding α-anomers which typically displayed anomeric chemical shifts of δH(CDCl3) 4.0-4.1. The anomeric stereochemistry of the O-glycoside 18b rests on the anomeric 1JCH and 3JH1,H2 coupling constants of 171.9 and 3.5 Hz, respectively.
Scheme 2.
Correlation of the Anomeric Stereochemistry of Compounds 10β and 20, and of Compounds 12 and 21
The underlying reason for the α-selectivity enforced by the presence of an ester group at the 3-position in these C-glycosylations, and in indeed in their O-counterparts, remains obscure. The use of the 3-O-tert-butyloxycarbonyl protected system with retention of the carbonate, as in the O-glycosylation series, argues strongly against neighboring group participation as we have discussed elsewhere.14 In recent work from the Kim group,5 with the 3-O-trichloroacetimidyl donor 22, that mirrors a much earlier observation of Nicolaou with a 3-deoxy-3-acetamido donor 24,15 it was demonstrated that cyclic intermediates (23 and 25, respectively) can be formed and trapped, leading them to the conclusion that the effect of the 3-O-ester can be explained by neighboring group participation. Amides and imidates are, however, considerably better nucleophiles than carboxylate esters,16,17 and we question their use as probes for the latter in the present context. We continue to work toward a more satisfactory explanation for the effect of the 3-O-esters and will address the issue more fully in a subsequent paper.
With respect to the 3-O-tosyl mannosyl donor 4 the moderate β-selectivity observed (Table 1, entries 16 and 17) is best explained in terms of the electron-withdrawing ability of the sulfonyl group stabilizing the covalent triflate and thereby reducing the concentration of ions pairs in the reaction mixture. We note that both the S-O and S=O single and double bonds are longer than their C-O and C=O counterparts and that the barrier for rotation about the SO2-O bond is small compared to that for rotation about the CO-O bond in carboxylate esters.18 As a consequence we consider that alternative explanations to the electron-withdrawing character of the sulfonate ester are not required in this case.
Interestingly, the use of pinacolone trimethylsilyl enol ether as nucleophile resulted in the formation of a significant amount of the O-glycoside 18b when the 3-O-acetyl glucosyl donor 8 was employed (Table 1, entry 15) whereas with the corresponding mannosyl donor 2 and its close analogs 3 and 9 only the C-glycosides were isolated (Table 1, entries 3, 7, and 10). This situation closely follows that observed earlier with the corresponding series of 3-O-benzyl donors, wherein a much higher yield of O-glycoside was observed for the gluco-configured donor than for the manno-isomer.3a This difference presumably reflects the increased reactivity of the 4,6-O-benzylidene protected glucopyranosyl donors over that of their mannopyranosyl counterparts on which we have remarked previously.1b
We have also very briefly investigated the formation of 4,6-O-benzylidene-protected C-mannosides by radical reactions employing allyltributylstannane19 as reagent. As expected on the basis of literature precedent for similarly protected systems,20 radicals generated from thioglycosides 26 and 27 obey the general rule21 of α-selectivity in the quenching of pyranosyl radicals and gave the α-allyl C-glycosides 28 and 29 in good yield irrespective of the protecting group at the 3-position (Scheme 3). As 4,6-O-benzylidene protected glucopyransoyl radicals are known22 to adopt either B2,5 or 4H5 conformations that closely approximate the calculated conformations23 of similarly protected oxocarbenium ions, the α-selectivity observed in the 3-O-benzyl series strongly supports the involvement of the counterion (in the CIP) in the β-selective formation of C- and O-glycosides under the typical ionic conditions.
Scheme 3.
Formation of α-C-Glycosides by Radical Reactions
The work presented here reinforces the notion of a commonality of mechanism for C- and O-glycoside formation and will likely be of use to workers interested in the effects of protecting groups24 on glycosylation reactions and in C-glycoside synthesis from both the mechanistic25 and preparative perspectives.26
Experimental Section
Phenyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(N,N-dibenzylcarbonyl)-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside (3)
To a stirred solution of phenyl 2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside 1 (530 mg, 1.18 mmol) in dry DMF (5 mL) was added NaH (60% suspension in mineral oil, 57 mg, 1.42 mmol) at 0 °C. After 10 min, a solution of N,N-dibenzylchloroformamide (366 mg, 1.42 mmol) in dry DMF (1 mL) was added to the reaction mixture at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 1 h before it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution and diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was separated and washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (15% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product (610 mg, 77%). [α]21D +54.8 (c = 1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52–7.16 (m, 23H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 5.59 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 2H), 5.44 (dd, J = 9.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.66–4.58 (m, 3H), 4.51–4.45 (m, 2H), 4.34–4.19 (m, 4H), 3.90 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100.9 MHz, CDCl3) δ 155.1, 137.8, 137.6, 137.5, 137.3, 134.1, 132.0, 129.4, 129.3, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 126.6, 102.1, 87.1, 78.9, 77.6, 76.9, 73.6, 72.4, 68.8, 65.5, 49.6, 49.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C41H39O6NSNa [M + Na]+, 696.2396; found, 696.2348.
Phenyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(4-methylbenzenesulfonyl)-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside (4)
To a stirred solution of phenyl 2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside 1 (255 mg, 0.57 mmol) in dry pyridine (5 mL) was added p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (475 mg, 2.50 mmol) followed by the addition of DMAP (61 mg, 0.50 mmol) at rt. After 8 h, Pyridine was removed and the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with 5% sodium carbonate solution, water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (20% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product with a yield of 230 mg (76%). [α]22D+68.1 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.79 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.42–7.25 (m, 15H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 5.43 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 4.85–4.83 (m, 2H), 4.73 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (dd, J = 1.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.15 (m, 3H), 3.84–3.80 (m, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.9, 137.4, 137.2, 133.3, 133.2, 132.3, 129.8, 129.5, 129.2, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 126.4, 101.8, 87.4, 79.0, 77.9, 76.0, 74.4, 68.5, 65.7, 21.9; ESI-HRMS calcd for C33H32O7S2Na [M + Na]+, 627.1487; found, 627.1475.
Phenyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside (5)
To a stirred solution of phenyl 2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside 1 (230 mg, 0.51 mmol) and imidazole (200 mg, 2.94 mmol) in dry DMF (5 mL) was added tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (348 mg, 2.31 mmol) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 14 h before it was diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (10% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product (245 mg, 85%). [α]26D +104.1 (c = 1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.55–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.31 (m, 13H), 5.63 (s, 1H), 5.55 (s, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.33–4.29 (m, 1H), 4.25–4.22 (m, 2H), 4.15 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.0–3.99 (m, 1H), 3.89 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 0.95 (s, 9H), 0.16 (s, 3H), 0.11 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.3, 137.9, 134.3, 131.8, 129.4, 129.1, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 127.8, 126.5, 102.2, 87.9, 81.3, 79.5, 74.2, 71.1, 68.8, 65.9, 26.2, 18.6, -4.2, -4.5; ESI-HRMS calcd for C32H40O5SiSNa [M + Na]+, 587.2263; found, 587.2264.
Ethyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-d-glucopyranoside (7)
To a solution of ethyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-d-glucopyranoside (312 mg, 1.0 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (68 mg, 0.2 mmol) in methylene chloride (16 mL) /1N NaOH (5 mL) was added benzyl bromide (143 μL, 1.2 mmol) at rt. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux at 45 °C for 24 h before it was cooled down to rt and diluted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was separated and washed with water, saturated NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (20% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product (54 mg, 14%). [α]20D–32.8 (c = 1, CHCl3; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.50–7.31 (m, 10H), 5.54 (s, 1H), 4.96 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.70 (s, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.37–4.34 (m, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J = 8.5, 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.55 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49–3.45 (m, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 8.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.83–2.74 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.33 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.2, 137.2, 129.5, 128.8, 128.6, 128.3, 127.9, 127.2, 126.5, 102.0, 85.8, 81.7, 80.7, 75.8, 75.5, 70.3, 68.9, 65.6, 25.5, 15.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C22H26O5SNa [M + Na]+, 425.1399; found, 425.1384.
Ethyl 3-O-acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-d-glucopyranoside (8)
To a stirred solution of ethyl 2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-d-glucopyranoside 7 (50 mg, 0.12 mmol) and DIPEA (129 μL, 0.74 mmol) in dry methylene chloride (5 mL) was added acetyl chloride (44 μL, 0.62 mmol) at 0 °C. After 10 min, the reaction mixture was warmed up to rt and stirred for 30 min before it was diluted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (20% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product (54 mg, 98%). [α]21D–32.3 (c = 1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.45–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.31 (m, 8H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 5.38 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.38–4.35 (m, 1H), 3.77 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.48 (m, 2H), 2.84–2.76 (m, 2H), 1.98 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.0, 137.9, 137.2, 129.3, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 126.4, 101.6, 86.2, 80.1, 79.0, 75.6, 74.5, 70.6, 68.9, 25.8, 21.2, 15.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C24H28O6SNa [M + Na]+, 467.1504; found, 467.1487.
Phenyl 3-O-acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside S-Oxide (9)
To a stirred solution of phenyl 3-O-acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside 2 (400 mg, 0.81 mmol) in methylene chloride (20 mL) was added m-CPBA (77%, 182 mg, 0.81 mmol) at –78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to –20 °C naturally over 1.5 h before it was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The organic layer was separated and washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (40% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product (368 mg, 89%). [α]22D–57.1 (c = 1, CHCl3; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.69–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.48–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.31–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.16 (m, 2H), 5.62 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 4.53–4.51 (m, 3H), 4.33 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.27–4.24 (m, 3H), 3.77–3.73 (m, 1H), 2.01 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.1, 141.4, 137.2, 137.0, 132.0, 129.8, 129.4, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 126.5, 124.9, 102.2, 97.3, 75.6, 73.4, 72.6, 70.7, 70.2, 68.5, 21.1; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H28O7SNa [M + Na]+, 531.1453; found, 531.1461.
General Procedure 1 for Glycosylation Using the Diphenyl Sulfoxide/TTBP/Tf2O System
To a stirred solution of donor (1 equiv), diphenyl sulfoxide (1.2 equiv), TTBP (1.5 equiv), and 4 Å molecular sieves in CH2Cl2 (0.05 M in substrate) at –55 °C under an argon atmosphere was added Tf2O (1.2 equiv). After 30 min of stirring at –55 °C, a solution of the glycosyl acceptor (5.0 equiv) was slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred for a further 2-12 h at –55 °C before it was quenched with NaHCO3 solution at the same temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, and the molecular sieves were filtered off. The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with hexanes/ethyl acetate or hexanes/methyl tert-butyl ether mixtures, afforded the corresponding coupled products.
3-O-Acetyl-1-allyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-α-d-mannopyranose (10α) and 3-O-Acetyl-1-allyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-β-d-mannopyranose (10β)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 with a combined yield of 104 mg (81%, 3.52:1 α/β). Both anomers were separated by flash column chromatography on silica gel (10% methyl t-butyl ether: hexane). 10α: [α]23D+13.8 (c, 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.31 (m, 8H), 5.77–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 5.24–5.13 (m, 4H), 4.68 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.26–4.21 (m, 2H), 4.10 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (dd, J = 1.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.71 (m, 1H), 2.63-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.42–2.37 (m, 1H), 2.05 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.8, 137.9, 137.6, 133.3, 129.3, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 126.4, 118.6, 102.0, 76.8, 76.7, 76.4, 73.0, 70.8, 69.4, 66.0, 33.9, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C25H28O6Na [M + Na]+, 447.1784; found, 447.1775. 10β: Colorless oil; [α]20D–39.6 (c, 0.25, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.33 (m, 8H), 5.78–5.70 (m, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.11–5.07 (m, 3H), 4.76 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.31–4.28 (m, 1H), 4.18 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.03–4.01 (m. 1H), 3.97 (m, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (t, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.63 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.52–3.47 (m, 1H), 2.53–2.47 (m, 1H), 2.34–2.29 (m, 1H), 2.06 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.9, 137.6, 137.7, 134.1, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 126.4, 118.1, 101.9, 79.5, 76.9, 76.6, 75.8, 74.9, 72.2, 68.9, 35.6, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C25H28O6Na [M + Na]+, 447.1784; found, 447.1772.
3-O-Acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-(3,3-dimethyl-2-oxo-butyl)-α-d-mannopyranose (11)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 15% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 37 mg (76%); [α]22D–23.6(c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.31 (m, 8H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.12 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H),4.25–4.21 (m, 2H), 3.84 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (dd, J = 1.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.69–3.65 (m, 1H), 2.96 (s, 1H), 2.95 (s, 1H), 1.98 (s, 3H), 1.18 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 212.6, 170.7, 138.0, 137.5, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 128.1, 126.4, 101.9, 76.4, 72.9, 72.4, 70.4, 69.3, 67.4, 44.8, 36.1, 26.3, 21.2; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H34O7Na [M + Na]+, 505.2202; found, 505.2210.
3-O-Acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-α-d-mannopyranose (12α)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 15% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 40 mg (79%); [α]22D–17.9(c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.98–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.64–7.61 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.44 (m, 6H), 7.38–7.31 (m, 6H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 5.23 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.94–4.90 (m, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.28–4.23 (m, 2H), 3.97 (dd, J = 1.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.76 (m, 1H), 3.52 (dd, J = 5.0, 17.50 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (dd, J = 8.5, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 1.99 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.7, 170.8, 138.0, 137.5, 136.7, 134.6, 134.0, 129.3, 129.2, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.1, 128.0, 126.4, 102.0, 76.9, 76.6, 73.0, 72.6, 70.4, 69.3, 67.3, 38.1, 21.2; ESI-HRMS calcd for C30H30O7Na [M + Na]+, 525.1889; found, 525.1866.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(N,N-dibenzylcarbonyl)-1-deoxy-1-allyl-α-d-mannopyranose(13)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 33 mg (73%); [α]22D–16.3(c = 0.4, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.15 (m, 18H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.77–5.70 (m, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.36 (dd, J = 3.5, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.20–5.12 (m, 2H), 4.70–4.59 (m, 4H), 4.29–4.18 (m, 4H), 4.11 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.08 (dd, J = 2.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.86–3.76 (m, 2H), 2.68–2.62 (m, 1H), 2.44–2.39 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 156.3, 138.1, 137.7, 137.4, 137.3, 133.5, 129.2, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 126.5, 118.4, 102.0, 73.4, 72.5, 69.4, 65.9, 49.5, 49.3, 33.9; ESI-HRMS calcd for C38H39NO6Na [M + Na]+, 628.2675; found, 628.2616.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(N,N-dibenzylcarbonyl)-1-deoxy-1-(3,3-dimethyl-2-oxo-butyl)-α-d-mannopyranose (14)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 15% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 37 mg (76%); [α]22D–17.9(c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.49–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.33–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.267 (m, 5H), 7.20–7.15 (m, 6H), 7.05–7.02 (m, 2H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.31 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.81–4.78 (m, 2H), 4.67 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 4.60–4.57 (m, 2H), 4.30–4.15 (m, 4H), 4.02 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.71 (m, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J = 6.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (dd, J = 8.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 1.20 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 212.5, 156.3, 138.3, 137.7, 137.4, 137.3, 129.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.5, 128.2, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6, 126.5, 101.9, 78.3, 73.3, 72.9, 72.1, 69.3, 67.3, 49.5, 49.3, 44.8, 36.1, 26.4; ESI-HRMS calcd for C41H45NO7Na [M + Na]+, 686.3094; found, 686.3115.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(N,N-dibenzylcarbonyl)-1-deoxy-1-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-α-d-mannopyranose (15)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 20% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 44 mg (86%); [α]20D–9.5 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.98 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 5H), 7.41–7.25 (m, 10H), 7.20–7.15 (m, 5H), 7.03 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 5.41 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.70–4.65 (m, 2H), 4.57 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (dd, J = 9.0, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.25–4.19 (m, 3H), 4.16–4.15 (m, 2H), 3.85–3.83 (m, 2H), 3.58 (dd, J = 6.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 8.0, 17.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.6, 156.3, 138.2, 137.7, 137.4, 137.3, 136.7, 133.9, 129.3, 129.1, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6, 126.5, 102.0, 78.3, 73.3, 73.0, 72.1, 69.3, 67.3, 49.6, 49.3, 38.2; ESI-HRMS calcd for C43H41NO7Na [M + Na]+, 706.2781; found, 706.2772.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1-deoxy-1-allyl-α-d-mannopyranose (16α) and 4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-tert-butoxycarbonyl-1-deoxy-1-allyl-β-d-mannopyranose (16β)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 with a combined yield of 44 mg (44%, 7.8:1 α/β). Both anomers were separated by flash column chromatography on silica gel (10% methyl t-butyl ether: hexane). 16α: [α]23D–0.174 (c = 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.29 (m, 8H), 5.74–5.66 (m, 1H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.16–5.10 (m, 2H), 5.04 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (q, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H), 4.28–4.22 (m, 2H), 4.08 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (dd, J = 1.5, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.74–3.69 (m, 1H), 2.61–2.55 (m, 1H), 2.37–2.31 (m, 1H), 1.49 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.2, 138.0, 137.6, 133.3, 129.2, 18.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 126.4, 118.4, 101.9, 82.9, 77.1, 76.9, 76.3, 73.6, 73.4, 69.3, 65.9, 33.8, 28.0; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H34O7Na [M + Na]+, 505.2202; found, 505.2206. 16β: [α]23D–35.50 (c = 0.40, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51–7.49 (m, 2H), 7.42–7.31 (m, 8H), 5.74–5.65 (m, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.07–5.04 (m, 2H), 4.92–4.88 (m, 2H), 4.56 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J = 4.5, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.51–3.46 (m, 1H), 2.50–2.44 (m, 1H), 2.28–2.23 (m, 1H), 1.51 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.3, 138.0, 137.7, 134.2, 129.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 126.5, 117.9, 101.8, 83.0, 79.5, 77.8, 76.6, 76.1, 75.6, 72.1, 68.8, 35.6, 28.0; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H34O7Na [M + Na]+, 505.2202; found, 505.2208.
3-O-Acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-allyl-α-d-glucopyranose (17)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 30.0 mg (63 %); [α]23D +13.8 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 8H), 5.80–5.71 (m, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 5.43 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 5.16–5.09 (m, 2H), 4.64 (s, 2H), 4.26 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.13–4.11 (m, 1H), 3.75–3.71 (m, 2H), 3.66 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 2.65–2.58 (m, 1H), 2.55–2.52 (m, 1H), 2.08 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.4, 138.0, 137.3, 134.2, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 126.4, 117.7, 101.7, 80.2, 77.9, 74.9, 73.1, 71.5, 69.7, 63.7, 31.0, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C25H28O6Na [M + Na]+, 447.1784; found, 447.1791.
3-O-Acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-(3,3-dimethyl-2-oxo-butyl)-α-d-glucopyranose (18α)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 15% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 33 mg (41 %); [α]22D+21.2 (c = 1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 8H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 5.33 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 4.94–4.91 (m, 1H), 4.58 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25–4.23 (m, 1H), 3.76–3.73 (m, 1H), 3.70–3.67 (m, 2H), 3.61 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (dd, J = 5.5, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (dd, J = 7.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.9 MHz, CDCl3) δ 212.5, 170.5, 137.7, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 126.3, 101.7, 79.9, 73.0, 71.6, 71.5, 69.6, 65.1, 44.7, 34.4, 26.3, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H34O7Na [M + Na]+, 505.2202; found, 505.2213.
(3,3-Dimethyl-2-buten-2-yl) 3-O-acetyl-2-O--benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-α-d-glucopyranoside (18β)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 17 mg (21 %); [α]22D +42.2 (c = 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.30 (m, 8H), 5.61 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 5.36 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.28–4.24 (m, 1H), 4.22 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 3.89–3.84 (m, 1H), 3.71–3.64 (m, 2H), 3.58 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.09 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.0, 169.3, 138.0, 137.3, 129.2, 128.7, 128.4, 128.1, 127.8, 126.4, 101.7, 94.8, 82.6, 79.8, 77.7, 72.5, 71.0, 69.3, 63.2, 36.5, 28.5, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C28H34O7Na [M + Na]+, 505.2202; found, 505.2158.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(4-methylbenzenesulfonyl)-1-deoxy-1-allyl-α-d-mannopyranose (19α) and 4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-(4-methylbenzenesulfonyl)-1-deoxy-1-allyl-β-d-mannopyranose (19β)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 with a combined yield of 42 mg (53%, 1:4 α/β). Both anomers were separated by flash column chromatography on silica gel (15% methyl t-butyl ether: hexane). 19α: [α]22D–35.5 (c = 0.4, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.32 (m, 6H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.65–5.60 (m, 1H), 5.46 (s, 1H), 5.13–5.09 (m, 2H), 4.84 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.22–4.16 (m, 2H), 4.04–4.01 (m, 2H), 3.77 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.56 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.45 (m, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 2.33–2.27 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.7, 137.8, 137.3, 133.7, 132.9, 129.7, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.2, 126.4, 118.7, 101.8, 78.3, 77.8, 76.4, 74.2, 69.1, 66.1, 33.8, 21.9; ESI-HRMS calcd for C30H32O7SNa [M + Na]+, 559.1766; found, 559.1750. 19β: [α]22D–7.8 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 7.40–7.31 (m, 6H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.69–5.62 (m, 1H), 5.42 (s, 1H), 5.12–5.03 (m, 3H), 4.75 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.66 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.24–4.21 (m, 1H), 4.14–4.10 (m, 2H), 3.78–3.74 (m, 1H), 3.53 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.36–3.31 (m, 1H), 2.49–2.43 (m, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H), 2.25–2.19 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.8, 137.9, 137.3, 133.9, 133.4, 129.7, 129.1, 129.0, 128.6, 128.3, 128.2, 126.4, 118.1, 101.8, 82.0, 79.7, 77.4, 76.1, 75.9, 72.1, 68.7, 35.5, 21.9; ESI-HRMS calcd for C30H32O7SNa [M + Na]+, 559.1766; found, 559.1754.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-1-deoxy-1-allyl-β-d-mannopyranose (20)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 28 mg (76%); [α]22D–52.0 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.29 (m, 6H), 5.77–5.69 (m, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (t, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (s, 1H), 4.64 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H), 4.28–4.25 (m, 1H), 4.03 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.53 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.41–3.37 (m, 1H), 2.52–2.46 (m, 1H), 2.35–2.29 (m, 1H), 0.92 (s, 9H), 0.14 (s, 3H), 0.07 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.0, 137.9, 134.6, 129.1, 128.5, 128.3, 127.8, 126.5, 117.7, 102.2, 79.7, 79.5, 75.7, 75.5, 72.2, 69.0, 35.8, 26.2, 18.6, -4.1, -4.5; ESI-HRMS calcd for C29H40O5SiNa [M + Na]+, 519.2543; found, 519.2564.
Correlation of Compounds 10β and 20
To a stirred solution of 20 (28 mg, 0.056 mmol) in dry THF (0.5 mL) was added acetic acid (25 μL) followed by the addition of TBAF (1M in THF, 0.56 mL, 0.56 mmol) at rt under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 1 h before it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate followed by washing with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (20% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the alcohol (21 mg, 97%). To a stirred solution of the alcohol (21 mg, 0.054 mmol) and DIPEA (94 μL, 0.54 mmol) in dry methylene chloride (1 mL) was added acetyl chloride (19 μL, 0.27 mmol) at 0 °C. After 10 min, the reaction mixture was warmed up to rt and stirred for 30 min before it was diluted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (15% ethyl acetate: hexane) gave a compound (22 mg, 98%), whose spectral data were identical with those of compound 10β reported above.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-2-O-benzyl-3-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-1-deoxy-1-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-α-d-mannopyranose (21)
Prepared by the general procedure 1 (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) with a yield of 99 mg (81%); [α]22D–17.8 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.84–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.56 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.40–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.14–7.11 (m, 1H), 5.58 (s, 1H), 5.09 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.25–4.21 (m, 2H), 4.09 (dd, J = 3.0, 9.5 Hz, 1H), 4.02 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.91–3.90 (m, 1H), 3.79 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.49–3.44 (m, 1H), 3.25 (dd, J = 5.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 3.14 (dd, J = 7.5, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.17 (s, 3H), 0.09 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.7, 138.7, 137.9, 136.9, 133.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 127.9, 126.5, 102.3, 79.7, 79.2, 75.9, 75.7, 75.1, 72.1, 68.9, 40.0, 26.2, 18.6, -4.1, -4.4; ESI-HRMS calcd for C34H42O6SiNa [M + Na]+, 597.2648; found, 597.2621.
3-O-Acetyl-2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-(2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)-β-d-mannopyranose (12β)
To a stirred solution of 21 (28 mg, 0.049 mmol) in dry THF (0.5 mL) was added TBAF (1M in THF, 0.49 mL, 0.49 mmol) at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 min before it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate, washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (20% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desilylated alcohol (21 mg), which was taken up in pyridine (1 mL) and treated with acetic anhydride (0.5 mL) at room temperature. After 2h, the solvents were removed under vacuum and the product was subjected to chromatographic purification (15% ethyl acetate: hexane) to give 12β (19 mg, 78 %), [α]22D–28.2 (c = 0.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.84 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.20 (m, 12H), 5.59 (s, 1H), 5.27 (dd, J = 10.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.31–4.26 (m, 2H), 4.20–4.16 (m, 2H), 3.85 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.61–3.58 (m, 1H), 3.31 (dd, J = 5.5, 17.50 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 7.0, 17.5 Hz, 1H), 2.12 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.0, 170.68, 137.8, 137.6, 136.7, 133.6, 129.3, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 126.4, 101.9, 76.7, 76.6, 75.9, 75.6, 74.4, 72.0, 68.8, 39.8, 21.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C30H30O7Na [M + Na]+, 525.1889; found, 525.1871.
Conversion of Compound 12α to 21 with Inversion of Anomeric Configuration
To a stirred solution of 12α (40 mg, 0.08 mmol) in methanol was added 25% sodium methoxide in methanol (50 μL) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 30 min before it was diluted with ethyl acetate The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure to provide the crude alcohol. To a stirred solution of the crude alcohol (0.08 mmol) and imidazole (27 mg, 0.4 mmol) in dry DMF (1 mL) was added tert-butyldimethylsilyl chloride (48 mg, 0.32 mmol) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred at rt for 12 h before it was diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification (10% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded a compound (39 mg, 86%), whose spectral data were identical to those of compound 21 reported above.
Phenyl 4,6-O-benzylidene-3-O-benzoyl-2-O-benzyl-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside (27)
To a stirred solution of phenyl 2-O-benzyl-4,6-O-benzylidene-1-deoxy-1-thio-α-d-mannopyranoside 1 (300 mg, 0.66 mmol) in dry pyridine (5 mL) was added benzoyl chloride (387 μL, 3.33 mmol) followed by the addition of DMAP (81 mg, 0.66 mmol) at rt. After 3h, Pyridine was removed and the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with 5% sodium carbonate solution, water and brine, dried over sodium sulfate and concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic purification on silica gel (eluent 10% ethyl acetate: hexane) afforded the desired product with a yield of 336 mg (91%); [α]21D +27.3 (c = 0.4, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.13 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.64–7.20 (m, 18H), 5.70 (s, 1H), 5.65 (s, 1H), 5.62 (dd, J = 3.5, 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.55–4.48 (m, 2H), 4.43 (dd, J = 2.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (dd, J = 5.0, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100.9 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.1, 137.5, 137.4, 134.0, 132.1, 130.2, 130.1, 129.5, 129.3, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 126.4, 102.0, 86.9, 78.1, 77.1, 76.6, 73.4, 71.4, 68.8, 65.7; ESI-HRMS calcd for C33H30O6SNa [M + Na]+, 577.1661; found, 577.1636.
General Procedure 2 for Radical Reactions
A stirred solution of thioglycoside (1.0 equiv), allyltributylstannane (3.0 equiv) and (0.2 equiv) 1,1′-azobis(cyclohexanecarbonitrile) in dry degassed toluene was heated to reflux under nitrogen at 113 °C. Three further portions of (0.2 equiv) 1,1′-azobis(cyclohexanecarbonitrile) were added at intervals of 2 h and the reaction mixture then was stirred under reflux for 5 h. The solvents were removed and the crude reaction mixture was purified over silica gel eluting with 15% ethyl acetate/hexanes.
4,6-O-Benzylidene-3-O-benzoyl-2-O-benzyl-1-deoxy-1-allyl-α-d-mannopyranose (29)
Prepared by the general procedure 2 with a yield of 89 mg (78%, α only). 28: [α]21D–56.8 (c = 1.0, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.62–7.18 (m, 13H), 5.80–5.73 (m, 1H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 5.50 (dd, J = 3.5, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 5.24–5.15 (m, 2H), 4.65 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 4.31–4.28 (m, 1H), 4.16 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.85–3.80 (m, 1H), 2.70–2.64 (m, 1H), 2.50–2.44 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.3, 137.8, 137.6, 133.4, 130.1, 129.2, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 126.3, 118.7, 101.9, 76.9, 76.5, 73.1, 71.4, 69.4, 66.1, 33.9; ESI-HRMS calcd for C30H30O6Na [M + Na]+, 509.1940; found, 509.1903.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the NIH (GM62160) for support of this work.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Copies of the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of all compounds. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.a Crich D, Sun S. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:4506–4507. doi: 10.1021/jo9606517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Crich D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010;43:1144–1153. doi: 10.1021/ar100035r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a Crich D, Li W. Org. Lett. 2006;8:959–962. doi: 10.1021/ol060030s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Crich D, Li W. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:2387–2391. doi: 10.1021/jo062431r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Crich D, Li W. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:7794–7797. doi: 10.1021/jo7012912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Crich D, Xu B. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4033–4035. doi: 10.1021/ol801548k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Crich D, Navuluri C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:3049–3052. doi: 10.1002/anie.200907178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Crich D, Sharma I. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4731–4734. doi: 10.1021/ol8017038.McGarvey GJ, LeClair CA, Schmidtmann BA. Org. Lett. 2008;10:4727–4730. doi: 10.1021/ol801710s. For parallel work see:
- 4.a Crich D, Cai W, Dai Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000;65:1291–1297. doi: 10.1021/jo9910482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Crich D, Yao Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:8232–8236. doi: 10.1021/ja048070j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Crich D, Picard S. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:9576–9579. doi: 10.1021/jo902254w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Ustyuzhanina N, Komarova B, Zlotina N, Krylov V, Gerbst A, Tsvetkov Y, Nifantiev N. Synlett. 2006:921–923. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baek JY, Lee B-Y, Jo MG, Kim KS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:17705–17713. doi: 10.1021/ja907252u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crich D, Dudkin V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:5643–5646. [Google Scholar]
- 7.a Crich D, Sun S. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:8321–8348. [Google Scholar]; b Dubois E, Beau JM. Carbohydr. Res. 1992;228:103–120. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)90552-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ekeloef K, Oscarson S. Carbohydr. Res. 1995;278:289–300. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(95)00269-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a Crich D, Mataka J, Sun S, Lam K-C, Rheingold AR, Wink DJ. Chem. Commun. 1998:2763–2764. [Google Scholar]; b Crich D, Mataka J, Zakharov LN, Rheingold AL, Wink DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:6028–6036. doi: 10.1021/ja0122694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.N–Values reported in Table 1 are taken from Mayr H, Kempf B, Ofial AR. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003;36:66–77. doi: 10.1021/ar020094c.
- 10.a Crich D, Smith M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:9015–9020. doi: 10.1021/ja0111481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Crich D, Smith M, Yao Q, Picione J. Synthesis. 2001:323–326. [Google Scholar]; c Crich D, Banerjee A, Li W, Yao Q. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2005;24:415–424. doi: 10.1081/CAR-200066978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Codée JDC, van den Bos LJ, Litjens REJN, Overkleeft HS, van Boeckel CAA, van Boom JH, van der Marel GA. Tetrahedron. 2004;60:1057–1064. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Codée JDC, Hossain LH, Seeberger PG. Org. Lett. 2005;7:3251–3254. doi: 10.1021/ol051038p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Z, Shao H, Lacroix E, Wu S-H, Jennings HJ, Zou W. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:8097–8015. doi: 10.1021/jo034446k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crich D, Hu T, Cai F. J. Org. Chem. 2008;73:8942–8953. doi: 10.1021/jo801630m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nicolaou KC, Daines RA, Ogawa Y, Chakraborty TK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:4696–4705. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Imidates react with a variety of electrophiles, including carboxylic anhydrides with which esters patently do not. Roger R, Neilson DG. Chem. Rev. 1961;61:179–211.Neilson DG. In: The Chemistry of Amidines and Imidates. Patai S, editor. Vol. 1. Wiley-Interscience; London: 1975. pp. 385–489.
- 17.For specific examples of the trapping of glycosyl oxocarbenium ions by amides in cases when esters are innocuous see Liao L, Auzanneau F-I. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:6265–6273. doi: 10.1021/jo050707+.
- 18.a Stang PJ, Crittell CM, Arif AM, Karni M, Apeloig Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113:7461–7470. [Google Scholar]; b Bindal RD, Golab JT, Katzenellenbogen JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:7861–7868. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Keck GE, Enholm EJ, Yates JB, Wiley MR. Tetrahedron. 1985;41:4079–4094. [Google Scholar]
- 20.a Brunckova J, Crich D, Yao Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6619–6622. [Google Scholar]; b Yamazaki N, Eichenberger E, Curran DP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994;35:6623–6626. [Google Scholar]; c Crich D, Sun S, Brunckova J. J. Org. Chem. 1996;61:605–615. doi: 10.1021/jo951194h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Chénedé A, Perrin E, Rekaï ED, Sinaÿ P. Synlett. 1994:420–422. [Google Scholar]
- 21.a Giese B, Dupuis J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1983;22:622–623. [Google Scholar]; b Adlington RM, Baldwin JE, Basak RP, Kozyrod RP. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1983:944–945. [Google Scholar]; c Pearce AJ, Mallet J-M, Sinaÿ P. In: Radicals in Organic Synthesis. Renaud P, Sibi MP, editors. Vol. 2. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2001. pp. 538–577. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Korth HG, Sustmann R, Dupuis J, Giese B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2. 1986:1453–1459. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Whitfield DM. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2009;62:83–159. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2318(09)00004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.a Litjens REJN, van den Bos LJ, Codée JDC, Overkleeft HS, van der Marel G. Carbohydr. Res. 2007;342:419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Codée JDC, Ali A, Overkleeft HS, van der Marel GA. C. R. Chimie. 2010:0000–0000. (doi:10.1016/j.crci.2010.05.010) [Google Scholar]; c Pedersen CM, Marinescu LG, Bols M. C. R. Chimie. 2010:0000–0000. (doi:10.1016/j.crci.2010.03.030) [Google Scholar]; d Bohé L, Crich D. C. R. Chimie. 2010:0000–0000. (doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2010.03.016) [Google Scholar]; e Bohé L, Crich D. Trends Glycosci. Glycotech. 2010;22:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 25.a Yang MT, Woerpel KA. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:545–553. doi: 10.1021/jo8017846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Krumper JR, Salamant WA, Woerpel KA. J. Org. Chem. 2009;74:8039–8050. doi: 10.1021/jo901639b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Beaver MG, Billings SG, Woerpel KA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:2082–2086. doi: 10.1021/ja0767783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Beavern MG, Woerpel KA. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:1107–1118. doi: 10.1021/jo902222a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Smith DM, Woerpel KA. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:1195–1201. doi: 10.1039/b600056h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.a Choumane M, Banchet A, Probst N, Gérard S, Plé K, Haudrechy A. C. R. Chimie. 2010:0000–0000. (doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2010.05.015) [Google Scholar]; b Levy DE, Tang C. The Chemistry of C-Glycosides. Pergamon; Oxford: 1995. p. 291. [Google Scholar]; c Postema MHD, editor. C-Glycoside Synthesis. CRC; Boca Raton: 1995. p. 400. [Google Scholar]; d Beau J-M, Gallagher T. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997;187:1–54. [Google Scholar]; e Nicotra F. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997;187:55–83. [Google Scholar]; f Dondoni A, Marra A. Chem. Rev. 2000;100:4395–4421. doi: 10.1021/cr9903003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Du Y, Linhardt RJ. Tetrahedron. 1998;54:9913–9959. [Google Scholar]; h Yuan XJ, Linhardt RJ. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005;5:1393–1430. doi: 10.2174/156802605774643033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Lee DYW, He MS. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005;5:1333–1350. doi: 10.2174/156802605774643042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







