Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(13):5437–5439. doi: 10.1021/ja00039a072

Solvent Effects on the Energetics of Prolyl Peptide Bond Isomerization

Eric S Eberhardt 1, Stewart N Loh 1, Andrew P Hinck 1, Ronald T Raines 1,
PMCID: PMC3065016  NIHMSID: NIHMS208696  PMID: 21451730

Abstract

Racemic Ac-Gly–[β,δ-13C]Pro-OMe was synthesized, and the kinetics and thermodynamics of the isomerization of its prolyl peptide bond were determined in nine solvents by using NMR and IR spectroscopy. The free energy of activation is 1.3 kcal/mol larger in water than in aprotic solvents, and correlates with the ability of a solvent to donate a hydrogen bond but not with solvent polarity. These results are consistent with conventional pictures of amide resonance, which require transfer of charge between oxygen and nitrogen during isomerization. Similar medium effects may modulate the stability of planar peptide bonds in the active site of peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerases (PPIases) and during the folding, function, or lysis of proteins.


The interconversion of cis (E) and trans (Z) isomers of peptide bonds that include the nitrogen of proline residues can give rise to a slow kinetic phase during protein folding.1,2 This interconversion is catalyzed by the peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerases (PPIases).3,4 Two of these enzymes, cyclophilin and FK-506 binding protein (FKBP), have been studied extensively: (1) isotope effects and analyses of mutant enzymes6 suggest that the prolyl peptide bond does not suffer nucleophilic attack during catalysis, (2) calorimetry shows that binding to FKBP occurs with a large decrease in heat capacity,7 and (3) structural studies of cyclophilin8 and FKBP9 reveal active sites composed of hydrophobic side chains.10 Consequently, desolvation has been proposed as a significant contributor to catalysis by the PPIases.11 This proposal is consistent with NMR line shape analyses of simple amides, which suggest that the rate of amide bond isomerization does indeed depend on solvent.12 To assess the contribution of desolvation to catalysis by the PPIases, we have determined the effect of solvent on the energetics of prolyl peptide bond isomerization (eq 1).

We performed our analyses on the simplest dipeptide that contains a prolyl peptide bond. Racemic Ac–Gly–[β,δ-13C]Pro–OMe (1) was synthesized using standard methods.13 The N- and C-termini of 1 were protected so as to minimize intramolecular electrostatic interactions.14 Solvent effects on the rate constants for the isomerization of the prolyl peptide bond of 1 were determined using inversion transfer 13C NMR spectroscopy.15,16 These measurements were performed at temperatures at which the rate constants were in the range detectable by NMR spectroscopy.17 Solvent effects on the amide I vibrational mode of Ac-Pro-OMe, a model of 1 with only one amide bond, were determined using IR spectroscopy.18

The origin of the barrier to the isomerization of amide bonds is commonly attributed to the double-bond character of the C–N bond, which results in net transfer of charge from nitrogen to the carbonyl carbon19 or oxygen20 (or both21). If the amide group has greater charge separation when planar than when orthogonal, then its isomerization via an orthogonal transition state should be faster in less polar solvents.22 Further, if the partial charge on oxygen is greater in planar than in orthogonal amides, then protic solvents should restrict isomerization by forming a hydrogen bond to oxygen.12,23

Temperature effects on the rate constant for the isomerization of 1 in different solvents are shown as Arrhenius plots in Figure 1. The data in Figure 1 indicate qualitatively that protic solvents restrict isomerization of 1. The rate constants for the isomerization of 1 do not, however, correlate with solvent dielectric constant or with other measures22 of solvent polarity. The rate constants do correlate with the ability of a solvent to donate a hydrogen bond. The relationship between the free energy of activation for the isomerization of 1 and the frequency of its amide I absorption band is shown in Figure 2. The amide I vibrational mode, which is primarily a C=O stretch, absorbs at lower frequency with increasing strength of a hydrogen bond to the amide oxygen.24,25 The data in Figure 2 therefore suggest that the barrier to isomerization (ΔG) is proportional to the strength of hydrogen bonds formed to the amide oxygen (given by υ). These results are consistent with conventional pictures of amide resonance (eq 1), which require transfer of charge between oxygen and nitrogen during isomerization.20,21

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Arrhenius plots for the cis to trans (A) and trans to cis (B) isomerizations of 1 in different solvents. Solvents (dielectric constant at 25°C) were as follows: ◇, dioxane (2.21); ○, benzene (2.27); ▽, toluene (2.38); ●, isopropyl alcohol (19.92); ■, ethanol (24.55); ◆, trifluoroethanol (26.14); □, acetonitrile (35.94); △, N,N-dimethylformamide (36.71); and Inline graphic, water (78.30). Linear regression analysis is shown for each protic solvent (—) and all aprotic solvents (---).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Plots of ΔG for isomerization of 1 vs υ of amide I vibrational mode of Ac-Pro-OMe in different solvents. Symbols are as in Figure 1. Values of ΔG were calculated by interpolating the Arrhenius plots of Figure 1 at 60°C. Weighted linear regression analysis is shown for cis to trans [—, slope = − 0.025 ± 0.003 kcal·cm/mol] and trans to cis [---, slope = − 0.029 ± 0.002 kcal·cm/mol]. ΔGaprotic – ΔGwater = 1.3 ± 0.2 kcal/mol.

Solvent effects on the equilibrium constant for the isomerization of 1 are small. The value of the equilibrium constant for all solvents studied was K = kEZ/kZE = 4.3 ± 0.9 at 60°C, as calculated by interpolating the Arrhenius plots of Figure 1.26 This lack of a solvent effect on K is also evident from the parallel lines in Figure 2. The absence of a significant solvent effect on K is consistent with the behavior observed for other amides.3d

Activation parameters indicate that the barrier to isomerization of 1 is almost entirely enthalpic in all solvents studied, as observed with other amides.12,27 The values of ΔG (Figure 2) for the isomerization of 1 are, however, 1–2 kcal/mol smaller than the analogous values for acyclic tertiary amides.12a,d The smaller barriers for prolyl peptide bond isomerization may result from pyramidalization of the prolyl nitrogen, which decreases amide resonance.28

The PPIases decrease the free energy of activation for prolyl peptide bond isomerization by 8 kcal/mol.3d Desolvation alone can apparently account for 1.3 kcal/mol of this decrease (Figure 2).29 Similar medium effects may modulate the stability of planar peptide bonds during the folding,1,2 function,30 or lysis28 of proteins.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Equation 1.

Equation 1

Acknowledgments

We thank Dave Quirk, Phil Hajduk, Dave Horita, Yejeng Liu, Kim Dirlam, and the staff at NMRFAM [Grant RR02301 (NIH)] for their assistance, and Professors Sam Gellman and George Reed for helpful discussions. E.S.E. is a Wharton Predoctoral Fellow. S.N.L. is supported by Cellular and Molecular Biology Training Grant GM07215 (NIH). A.P.H. is supported by Molecular Biophysics Training Grant GM08293 (NIH). R.T.R. is a Presidential Young Investigator (NSF), Searle Scholar (Chicago Community Trust), and Shaw Scientist (Milwaukee Foundation).

Footnotes

Supplementary Material Available: Figures showing 13C NMR spectrum of 1 (CDCl3) and IR spectrum of Ac-Pro-OMe (aqueous), and a table listing activation parameters for isomerization of 1 in all solvents studied (4 pages). Ordering information is given on any current masthead page.

Notes and References

  • 1.(a) Brandts JF, Halvorson HR, Brennan M. Biochemistry. 1975;14:4953–4963. doi: 10.1021/bi00693a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Schmid FX, Baldwin RL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:4764–4768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.4764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kelley RF, Richards FM. Biochemistry. 1987;26:6765–6774. doi: 10.1021/bi00395a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kiefhaber T, Quaas R, Hahn U, Schmid FX. Biochemistry. 1990;29:3053–3061. doi: 10.1021/bi00464a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Hurle MR, Marks CB, Kosen PA, Anderson S, Kuntz ID. Biochemistry. 1990;29:4410–4419. doi: 10.1021/bi00470a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Jackson SE, Fersht AR. Biochemistry. 1991;30:10436–10443. doi: 10.1021/bi00107a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Kiefhaber T, Kohler H-H, Schmid FX. J Mol Biol. 1992;224:217–229. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90585-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Kiefhaber T, Schmid FX. J Mol Biol. 1992;224:231–240. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90586-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For reviews, see: Kim PS, Baldwin RL. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:459–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002331.Nall BT. Comments Mol Cell Biophys. 1985;3:123–143.Jaenicke R. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1987;49:117–237. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(87)90011-3.Kim PS, Baldwin RL. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:631–660. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.003215.
  • 3.(a) Fischer G, Bang H, Berger E, Schellenberger A. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;791:87–97. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(84)90285-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Harrison RK, Stein RL. Biochemistry. 1990;29:3813–3816. doi: 10.1021/bi00468a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Harrison RK, Stein RL. Biochemistry. 1990;29:1684–1689. doi: 10.1021/bi00459a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kofron JL, Kuzmic P, Kishore V, Colón-Bonilla E, Rich DH. Biochemistry. 1991;30:6127–6134. 10818. doi: 10.1021/bi00239a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.For reviews, see: Fischer G, Schmid FX. Biochemistry. 1990;29:2205–2212. doi: 10.1021/bi00461a001.Schreiber SL. Science. 1991;251:283–287. doi: 10.1126/science.1702904.Gething MJ, Sambrook J. Nature. 1992;355:33–45. doi: 10.1038/355033a0.Cyert MS. Curr Biol. 1992;2:18–20. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(92)90410-c.
  • 5.Harrison RK, Caldwell CG, Rosegay A, Melillo D, Stein RL. J Am Chem Soc. 1990;112:7063–7064. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Liu J, Albers MW, Chen CM, Schreiber SL, Walsh CT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:2304–2308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Park ST, Aldape RA, Futer O, DeCenzo MT, Livingston DJ. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:3316–3324. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Connelly PR. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:2883–2885. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Kallen J, Spitzfaden C, Zurini MGM, Wider G, Widmer H, Wüthrich K, Walkinshaw MD. Nature. 1991;353:276–279. doi: 10.1038/353276a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wüthrich K, Spitzfaden C, Memert K, Widmer H, Wider G. FEBS Lett. 1991;285:237–247. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80808-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Fesik SW, Gampe RT, Jr, Eaton HL, Gemmecker G, Olejniczak ET, Neri P, Holzman TF, Egan DA, Edalji R, Simmer R, Helfrich R, Hochlowski J, Jackson M. Biochemistry. 1991;30:6574–6583. doi: 10.1021/bi00240a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Neri P, Meadows R, Gemmecker G, Olejniczak E, Nettesheim D, Logan T, Simmer R, Helfrich R, Holzman T, Severin J, Fesik S. FEBS Lett. 1991;294:81–88. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81348-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Fesik SW, Neri P, Meadows R, Olejniczak ET, Gemmecker G. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:3165–3166. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Moore JM, Peattie DA, Fitzgibbon MJ, Thompson JA. Nature. 1991;351:248–250. doi: 10.1038/351248a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Michnick SW, Rosen MK, Wandless TJ, Karplus M, Schreiber SL. Science. 1991;252:836–839. doi: 10.1126/science.1709301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Van Duyne GD, Standaert RF, Karplus PA, Schreiber SL, Clardy J. Science. 1991;252:839–842. doi: 10.1126/science.1709302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Van Duyne GD, Standaert RF, Schreiber SL, Clardy J. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:7433–7434. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stein RL. Curr Biol. 1991;1:234–236. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(91)90067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Radzicka A, Pedersen L, Wolfenden R. Biochemistry. 1988;27:4538–4541. doi: 10.1021/bi00412a047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Wolfenden R, Radzicka A. ChemTracts: Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;2(1):52–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.(a) Neuman RC, Jr, Woolfenden WR, Jonas V. J Phys Chem. 1969;73:3177–3180. [Google Scholar]; (b) Neuman RC, Jr, Jonas V, Anderson K, Barry R. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;44:1156–1161. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(71)80207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Drakenberg T, Forsén S. Chem Commun. 1971:1404–1405. [Google Scholar]; (d) Drakenberg T, Dahlqvist KI, Forsén S. J Phys Chem. 1972;76:2178–2183. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Ott DJ. Synthesis of Stable Isotopes. Wiley; New York: 1981. pp. 34–58. [Google Scholar]; (b) Young PE, Torchia DA. In: Peptides: Structure and Function. Hruby VJ, Rich DH, editors. Pierce; Rockford, IL: 1983. pp. 155–158. [Google Scholar]; (c) Bodanszky M. Peptide Chemistry. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1988. pp. 66–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.(a) Evans CA, Rabenstein DL. J Am Chem Soc. 1974;96:7312–7317. doi: 10.1021/ja00830a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fermandjian S, Tran-Dinh S, Savrda J, Sala E, Mermet-Bouvier R, Bricas E, Fromageot P. Biochim Biphys Acta. 1975;399:313–338. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(75)90261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Forsén S, Hoffman RA. J Chem Phys. 1963;39:2892–2901. [Google Scholar]; (b) Led JJ, Gesmar H. J Magn Reson. 1982;49:444–463. [Google Scholar]; (c) Engler R, Johnston E, Wade C. J Magn Reson. 1988;77:377–381. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.NMR experiments were done on a Brucker AM500 or Varian VXR500 instrument (125.77 MHz). Samples contained 0.1 M 1 in dry solvents that were fully deuterated (except trifluoroethanol: external deuterium lock) and neat (except water: 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 80% (v/v) H2O). Isomerization rates were not altered by spiking the organic solvents with 0.2 M H2O or by halving the concentration of 1.
  • 17.(a) Grathwohl C, Wüthrich K. Biopolymers. 1981;20:2623–2633. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wüthrich K. NMR of Protein and Nucleic Acids. Wiley; New York: 1986. pp. 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.IR experiments were done on a Nicolet 5PC spectrometer at 25°C using NaCl or CaF2 plates or a ZnSe crystal. Samples contained 0.01 M Ac-Pro-OMe (Bachem Bioscience, Inc.), except for water and dimethylformamide, which contained 2 M Ac-Pro-OMe. The frequency of the amide I vibrational mode was determined to within 3 cm−1, and was not altered by doubling the concentration of Ac-Pro-OMe or by raising the temperature to 60°C.
  • 19.(a) Wiberg KB, Laidig KE. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:5935–5943. [Google Scholar]; (b) Breneman CM, Wiberg KB. J Comp Chem. 1990;11:361–373. [Google Scholar]; (c) Wiberg KB, Breneman CM. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:831–840. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pauling L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond. 3. Cornell University Press; Ithaca, NY: 1960. pp. 281–282. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Robin MB, Bovey FA, Basch H. In: The Chemistry of Amides. Zabicky J, editor. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1970. pp. 1–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reichardt C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. VCH; New York: 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mirkin NG, Krimm S. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:9742–9747. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.(a) Miyazawa T, Shimanouchi T, Mizushima SI. J Chem Phys. 1956;24:408–418. [Google Scholar]; (b) Eaton G, Symons MCR, Rastogi PP. J Chem Soc, Faraday Trans 1. 1989;85:3257–3271. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.For reviews, see: Pimental GC, McClellan AL. The Hydrogen Bond. Freeman; New York: 1960. pp. 67–141.Krimm S, Bandekar J. Adv Prot Chem. 1986;38:181–364. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60528-8.Surewicz WK, Mantsch HH. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;952:115–130. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(88)90107-0.
  • 26.The equilibrium population of the cis isomer of 1 at 60°C varies from 14% (in trifluoroethanol) to 24% (in N,N-dimethylformamide).
  • 27.Albers MW, Walsh CT, Schreiber SL. J Org Chem. 1990;55:4984–4986. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.(a) Wang QP, Bennet AJ, Brown RS, Santarsiero BD. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:5757–5765. [Google Scholar]; (b) Bennet AJ, Somayaji V, Brown RS, Santarsiero BD. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:7563–7571. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Since the free energy of desolvation of a proline residue is 3.0 kcal/mol ( Gibbs PR, Radzicka A, Wolfenden R. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:4714–4715.), desolvation destabilizes by 1.7 kcal/mol the transition state for prolyl peptide bond isomerization. Interactions (such as hydrogen bonds) may stabilize by 6.7 kcal/mol an orthogonal transition state in the active sites of the PPIases. For a discussion of the manifestation of binding energy in enzymatic catalysis, see: Hansen DE, Raines RT. J Chem Educ. 1990;67:483–489.
  • 30.(a) Dunker AK. J Theor Biol. 1982;97:95–127. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90281-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gerwert K, Hess B, Engelhard M. FEBS Lett. 1990;261:449–454. [Google Scholar]; (c) Williams KA, Deber CM. Biochemistry. 1991;30:8919–8923. doi: 10.1021/bi00101a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES