Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1987 Dec 10;15(23):9985–9995. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.23.9985

The influence of tertiary structural restraints on conformational transitions in superhelical DNA.

C J Benham 1
PMCID: PMC306545  PMID: 3320960

Abstract

This paper examines theoretically the effects that restraints on the tertiary structure of a superhelical DNA domain exert on the energetics of linking and the onset of conformational transitions. The most important tertiary constraint arises from the nucleosomal winding of genomic DNA in vivo. Conformational transitions are shown to occur at equilibrium at less extreme superhelicities in DNA whose tertiary structure is restrained than in unrestrained molecules where the residual linking difference alpha res (that part of the superhelical deformation which is not absorbed by transitions) may be freely partitioned between twisting and bending. In the extreme case of a rigidly held tertiary structure, this analysis predicts that the B-Z transition will occur at roughly half the superhelix density needed to drive the same transition in solution, other factors remaining fixed. This suggests that superhelical transitions may occur at more moderate superhelical deformations in vivo than in solution. The influence on transition behavior of the tertiary structural restraints imposed by gel conditions also are discussed.

Full text

PDF
9985

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bauer W. R. Structure and reactions of closed duplex DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1978;7:287–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.07.060178.001443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer W., Vinograd J. Interaction of closed circular DNA with intercalative dyes. II. The free energy of superhelix formation in SV40 DNA. J Mol Biol. 1970 Feb 14;47(3):419–435. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benham C. J. Geometry and mechanics of DNA superhelicity. Biopolymers. 1983 Nov;22(11):2477–2495. doi: 10.1002/bip.360221112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benham C. J. Statistical mechanical analysis of competing conformational transitions in superhelical DNA. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 1):219–227. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benham C. J. Theoretical analysis of competitive conformational transitions in torsionally stressed DNA. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 25;150(1):43–68. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90324-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Benham C. J. Theoretical analysis of conformational equilibria in superhelical DNA. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:23–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benham C. J. Theoretical analysis of transitions between B- and Z-conformations in torsionally stressed DNA. Nature. 1980 Aug 7;286(5773):637–638. doi: 10.1038/286637a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Broyles S. S., Pettijohn D. E. Interaction of the Escherichia coli HU protein with DNA. Evidence for formation of nucleosome-like structures with altered DNA helical pitch. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jan 5;187(1):47–60. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dougherty G. Superhelical turns of closed circular DNA in solution and in a gel: evidence for a conformational difference. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1982 Dec;60(6):675–686. doi: 10.1038/icb.1982.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Esposito F., Sinden R. R. Supercoiling in prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA: changes in response to topological perturbation of plasmids in E. coli and SV40 in vitro, in nuclei and in CV-1 cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Jul 10;15(13):5105–5124. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.13.5105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuller F. B. The writhing number of a space curve. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Apr;68(4):815–819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.4.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Garner M. M., Felsenfeld G., O'Dea M. H., Gellert M. Effects of DNA supercoiling on the topological properties of nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):2620–2623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gellert M. DNA topoisomerases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:879–910. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.004311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haniford D. B., Pulleyblank D. E. Facile transition of poly[d(TG) x d(CA)] into a left-handed helix in physiological conditions. Nature. 1983 Apr 14;302(5909):632–634. doi: 10.1038/302632a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Horowitz D. S., Wang J. C. Torsional rigidity of DNA and length dependence of the free energy of DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 15;173(1):75–91. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90404-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iacono-Connors L., Kowalski D. Altered DNA conformations in the gene regulatory region of torsionally-stressed SV40 DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Nov 25;14(22):8949–8962. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.22.8949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Igo-Kemenes T., Hörz W., Zachau H. G. Chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:89–121. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kornberg R. D. Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:931–954. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kowalski D., Sanford J. P. Action of mung bean nuclease on supercoiled PM2 DNA. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jul 10;257(13):7820–7825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lamond A. I. Supercoiling response of a bacterial tRNA gene. EMBO J. 1985 Feb;4(2):501–507. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03656.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lancillotti F., Lopez M. C., Arias P., Alonso C. Z-DNA in transcriptionally active chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(6):1560–1564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.6.1560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen A., Weintraub H. An altered DNA conformation detected by S1 nuclease occurs at specific regions in active chick globin chromatin. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):609–622. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lebowitz J., Chaudhuri A. K., Gonenne A., Kitos G. Carbodiimide modification of superhelical PM2 DNA: considerations regarding reaction at unpaired bases and the unwinding of superhelical DNA with chemical probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977 Jun;4(6):1695–1711. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.6.1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lilley D. M. The inverted repeat as a recognizable structural feature in supercoiled DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6468–6472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Millar D. P., Robbins R. J., Zewail A. H. Direct observation of the torsional dynamics of DNA and RNA by picosecond spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Oct;77(10):5593–5597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mizuuchi K., Mizuuchi M., Gellert M. Cruciform structures in palindromic DNA are favored by DNA supercoiling. J Mol Biol. 1982 Apr 5;156(2):229–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90325-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morse R. H., Cantor C. R. Nucleosome core particles suppress the thermal untwisting of core DNA and adjacent linker DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jul;82(14):4653–4657. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.14.4653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Müller B. C., Raphael A. L., Barton J. K. Evidence for altered DNA conformations in the simian virus 40 genome: site-specific DNA cleavage by the chiral complex lambda-tris(4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline)cobalt(III). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1764–1768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nordheim A., Rich A. The sequence (dC-dA)n X (dG-dT)n forms left-handed Z-DNA in negatively supercoiled plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(7):1821–1825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.7.1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Panayotatos N., Wells R. D. Cruciform structures in supercoiled DNA. Nature. 1981 Feb 5;289(5797):466–470. doi: 10.1038/289466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paulson J. R., Laemmli U. K. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):817–828. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peck L. J., Wang J. C. Energetics of B-to-Z transition in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6206–6210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pettijohn D. E., Pfenninger O. Supercoils in prokaryotic DNA restrained in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1331–1335. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pulleyblank D. E., Shure M., Tang D., Vinograd J., Vosberg H. P. Action of nicking-closing enzyme on supercoiled and nonsupercoiled closed circular DNA: formation of a Boltzmann distribution of topological isomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Nov;72(11):4280–4284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Record M. T., Jr, Mazur S. J., Melançon P., Roe J. H., Shaner S. L., Unger L. Double helical DNA: conformations, physical properties, and interactions with ligands. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:997–1024. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.005025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Richardson S. M., Higgins C. F., Lilley D. M. The genetic control of DNA supercoiling in Salmonella typhimurium. EMBO J. 1984 Aug;3(8):1745–1752. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02041.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rubenstein J. L., Brutlag D., Clayton D. A. The mitochondrial DNA of Drosophila melanogaster exists in two distinct and stable superhelical forms. Cell. 1977 Oct;12(2):471–482. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90123-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Shore D., Baldwin R. L. Energetics of DNA twisting. II. Topoisomer analysis. J Mol Biol. 1983 Nov 15;170(4):983–1007. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sinden R. R., Pettijohn D. E. Chromosomes in living Escherichia coli cells are segregated into domains of supercoiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):224–228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Singleton C. K., Klysik J., Stirdivant S. M., Wells R. D. Left-handed Z-DNA is induced by supercoiling in physiological ionic conditions. Nature. 1982 Sep 23;299(5881):312–316. doi: 10.1038/299312a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith G. R. DNA supercoiling: another level for regulating gene expression. Cell. 1981 Jun;24(3):599–600. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson R. J., Mosig G. Stimulation of a Chlamydomonas chloroplast promoter by novobiocin in situ and in E. coli implies regulation by torsional stress in the chloroplast DNA. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):281–287. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90431-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Villeponteau B., Lundell M., Martinson H. Torsional stress promotes the DNAase I sensitivity of active genes. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(3 Pt 2):469–478. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90454-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vinograd J., Lebowitz J., Watson R. Early and late helix-coil transitions in closed circular DNA. The number of superhelical turns in polyoma DNA. J Mol Biol. 1968 Apr 14;33(1):173–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vogelstein B., Pardoll D. M., Coffey D. S. Supercoiled loops and eucaryotic DNA replicaton. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(1 Pt 1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weintraub H., Cheng P. F., Conrad K. Expression of transfected DNA depends on DNA topology. Cell. 1986 Jul 4;46(1):115–122. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90865-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Woodworth-Gutai M., Lebowitz J. Introduction of interrupted secondary structure in supercoiled DNA as a function of superhelix density: consideration of hairpin structures in superhelical DNA. J Virol. 1976 Apr;18(1):195–204. doi: 10.1128/jvi.18.1.195-204.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zivanovic Y., Goulet I., Prunell A. Properties of supercoiled DNA in gel electrophoresis. The V-like dependence of mobility on topological constraint. DNA-matrix interactions. J Mol Biol. 1986 Dec 5;192(3):645–660. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90282-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES