Abstract
The normal function of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway is to mediate apoptosis. Thus, this pathway is generally recognized to be critical in host immune surveillance against cancer. However, many studies have suggested that some key components in this pathway including Fas, death receptor 5 (DR5), Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and caspase-8 may contribute to cancer growth or metastasis. Our recent study on DR5 and caspase-8 expression in human head and neck cancer tissues indicate that high caspase-8 either alone or along with high DR5 in tumor tissue from patients with lymph node metastasis is significantly associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that these proteins may be involved in positive regulation of cancer metastasis. Thus, efforts should be made to better understand the role of the death receptor 5/FADD/caspase-8 death signaling in regulation of cancer metastasis.
Keywords: Caspase 8, DR5, FADD, Fas, Metastasis
The extrinsic death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway is known to be critical in host immune surveillance against cancer. Intriguingly, increasing number of studies suggest that this death signaling pathway may also exert non-apoptotic function in enhancing cancer growth or metastasis. Our recent study on detection of DR5 and caspase-8 in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) supports this notion as well (1). This article will briefly review current research-related to this topic in the literature and discuss our findings in HNSCC.
Death Receptor 5 (DR5)/FADD/caspase-8 Signaling
DR5, like other death receptors, is activated by binding to its ligand, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and initiates apoptosis through interaction with the adaptor protein, Fas-associated death domain (FADD), which further recruits and activates caspase-8 (2, 3). The cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c- FLIP), a truncated and dominant-negative homologue of caspase 8, inhibits the activation of the DR5-mediated death signaling by competing with caspase-8 for binding to FADD (4, 5). Thus, the DR5/FADD/caspase-8 signaling normally mediates an important apoptotic pathway (i.e., extrinsic apoptotic pathway).
Cancer Metastasis and Apoptosis
Cancer-related deaths occur largely due to the development of uncontrolled metastases. Thus the major reductions in cancer-related deaths will require effective strategy to prevent or eliminate disease dissemination (6). Metastasis is an inefficient process involving multistep events, in which only a small proportion of the many cells that migrate from the primary tumor successfully colonize distant sites (7). It is generally recognized that metastatic cells must first detach from the primary tumor mass and be able to survive in an anchorage-independent manner (i.e., survive from anoikis). Subsequently, the surviving cells must navigate the lymphatic and circulatory channels while at the same time evading immune surveillance. Circualting tumor cells must possess the cellular machinery to invade distal organs, implant within local tissues, and initiate de novo tumor growth. While each one of these steps is required for successful metastastic spread of tumor, anchorage-independent survival or resistance to apoptosis or anoikis represents a critical stage in the development of tumor metastasis (6, 7).
The Death Receptor Apoptotic Pathway and Anoikis
Under normal circumstances, epithelial cells undergo anoikis (i.e., detachment-induced apoptosis) on loss of anchorage to the extracellular matrix or when adhesion to the correct substrate is disrupted, primarily by initiating the death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway. In contrast, malignant epithelial cells with metastatic potential resist anoikis and can survive in an anchorage-independent fashion (6, 8, 9). The death receptor signaling inhibitor, c-FLIP, is highly expressed in several solid and hematologic tumors and, as such, allows tumor cells to escape death receptor-mediated apoptosis (10–13). Inhibition of c-FLIP sufficiently initiates apoptosis, sensitizes cancer cells to death receptor-induced apoptosis or overcomes anoikis-resistance and suppresses cancer metastasis (14–18). Thus, c-FLIP plays a critical role in anoikis resistance and distant tumor formation (14).
The TRAIL/DR5 Death Signaling and Cancer Metastasis
Earlier studies had shown that TRAIL can suppress experimental liver metastasis or contribute to interferon γ-mediated anti-metastatic effects (19, 20). A recent mouse knockout study suggests that TRAIL death receptor (only one in mouse compared with two TRAIL death receptors, DR4 and DR5, in human) plays a suppressive role in cancer metastasis without affecting primary tumor growth (21). In human melanoma tumor samples, a reduced DR5 expression was reported to be associated with metastatic lesions (22). Thus, it appears that the TRAIL/death receptor signaling pathway is associated with suppression of cancer metastasis.
However, other studies from human tissue specimens indicate that DR5 expression is overexpressed in several cancer types and significantly correlated with more aggressive tumor behavior and poor survival of cancer patients (e.g., with breast, lung or renal cell cancer) (23–25). TRAIL was reported to strongly induce the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, to enhances the invasion of apoptosis-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells in vitro by upregulation of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression and to strongly increase distant metastatic spread of pancreatic tumors in vivo (26). Another recent study demonstrated that oncogenic K-Ras and its effector, Raf1, convert death receptors (e.g., Fas and DR5) into invasion-inducing receptors by suppressing the ROCK/LIM kinase pathway, and this is essential for K-Ras/Raf1–driven metastasis formation (27). In this study, Fas ligand and TRAIL were shown to stimulate invasion of colorectal tumor cells and liver metastases in a K-Ras–dependent fashion. Loss of mutant K-Ras switched Fas and TRAIL receptors back into apoptosis mode and abrogated metastatic potential. Raf1 has also been shown to be essential for the switch in Fas function, for tumor cell survival in the liver, and for K-Ras–driven formation of liver metastases. K-Ras and Raf1 suppressed Rho kinase (ROCK)/LIM kinase-mediated phosphorylation of the actin-severing protein cofilin. Overexpression of ROCK or LIM kinase allowed Fas ligand to induce apoptosis in K-Ras–proficient cells and prevented metastasis formation, whereas their suppression protected K-Ras–deficient cells against apoptosis (27).
Both FADD and caspase-8 are key mediators of the DR5 death signaling. However, they also exert non-apoptotic functions. For instance, FADD was suggested to promote cell proliferation (28). While caspase-8 loss was shown to result in potentiation of neuroblastoma metastasis (29), increasing number of studies have recently shown that caspase-8 exerts a non-apoptotic function in enhancing cancer cell adhesion, migration, invasion and metastasis, particularly when apoptosis is compromised or inhibited (30–34). The mechanisms by which caspase-8 promotes cell invasion and metastasis involve its interaction with p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (31), with Src (32), or with the focal adhesion complex containing focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and calpain 2 (30) and Rab5 activation (34) primarily independent of its catalytic activity.
The DR5/FADD/caspase-8 Signaling in HNSCC
We analyzed the expression of DR5 and caspase-8 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in primary and metastatic HNSCCs and determined the impact of protein expression on patient survival. IHC analysis revealed a significant loss or downregulation of DR5 expression in matching pairs of primary tumors and lymph node metastasis (LNM) compared to primary tumors without metastasis. A similar trend was observed in caspase-8 expression although this did not reach statistical significance. Univariate analysis indicates that, in HNSCCs with no LNM, higher expression of caspase-8 alone or in combination with higher DR5 expression significantly correlated with better disease-free survival and overall survival (1). These data support an inhibitory role of the DR5/caspase-8 signaling in regulation of cancer development and progression.
Surprisingly, in HNSCCs with LNM, higher caspase-8 expression significantly correlated with poorer disease-free survival and overall survival. In these patients, DR5 levels were not associated with overall survival; however, higher DR5 was significantly associated with a worse disease-free survival. Combined analysis showed that high caspase-8 and DR5 together was significantly associated with poor disease-free and overall survival (1). In agreement, our unpublished data generated from the same cohort of HNSCC tissues show that high FADD expression alone or in combination with high DR5 or caspase-8 expression in HNSCC with LNM was significantly associated with poor disease-free and overall survival. These finding suggest that the DR5/FADD/caspase-8 signaling may have a role in promoting cancer metastasis in the late stage of cancer (e.g., metastasis).
It is possible that in primary tumors the DR5/FADD/caspase-8 signaling predominantly contributes to activation of apoptosis (e.g., anoikis) and therefore can prevent metastasis, but in metastatic tumor cells that have already escaped apoptosis (i.e., are resistant to anoikis), this signaling may be converted to pro-metastatic signaling that promotes invasion and metastasis.
Perspective.
In agreement with the foregoing discussion of the potential involvement of the DR5/FADD/caspase-8 signaling in promoting invasion and metastasis of cancer cell, Fas has recently been show to promote tumor growth (35). Moreover, another study has shown that Fas can act as an activator of PI3K by recruiting the Src family member Yes and the p85 subunit of PI3K to Fas. This signals for cell invasion via the glycogen synthase kinase 3β pathway and subsequent expression of matrix metalloproteinases, which most importantly, serve as a crucial trigger of basal invasion of glioblastoma in vivo (36). Thus, it is plausible that the death receptor signaling pathway (e.g., DR5/FADD/caspase-8) has a dark side in the regulation of cancer development and progression; most likely due to its non-apoptotic function. However, the underlying biology remains to be well elucidated. Uncovering the non-apoptotic function, particularly under apoptosis-compromising conditions (e.g., cancer metastasis), will significantly aid our understanding of the biology of cancer metastasis. Such an understanding may also inform appropriate strategies to exploit this pathway to develop novel therapies against cancer, particularly metastatic cancer. Greater efforts should be dedicated to this line of inquiry.
Acknowledgements
Work in author’s laboratory was supported by the Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholar award, and the National Cancer Center head and neck cancer SPORE grant P50 CA128613 (Project 2 to S-Y Sun). S-Y. Sun is a Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholar.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- 1.Elrod HA, Fan S, Muller S, et al. Analysis of death receptor 5 and caspase-8 expression in primary and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and their prognostic impact. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elrod HA, Sun SY. Modulation of death receptors by cancer therapeutic agents. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;7:163–173. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.2.5335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ashkenazi A. Targeting the extrinsic apoptosis pathway in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2008;19:325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roth W, Reed JC. FLIP protein and TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Vitam Horm. 2004;67:189–206. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(04)67011-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wajant H. Targeting the FLICE Inhibitory Protein (FLIP) in cancer therapy. Mol Interv. 2003;3:124–127. doi: 10.1124/mi.3.3.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eccles SA, Welch DR. Metastasis: recent discoveries and novel treatment strategies. Lancet. 2007;369:1742–1757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60781-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mehlen P, Puisieux A. Metastasis a question of life or death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:449–458. doi: 10.1038/nrc1886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simpson CD, Anyiwe K, Schimmer AD. Anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2008;272:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chiarugi P, Giannoni E. Anoikis a necessary death program for anchorage-dependent cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;76:1352–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhou XD, Yu JP, Liu J, et al. Overexpression of cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP) in gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004;106:397–405. doi: 10.1042/CS20030238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ullenhag GJ, Mukherjee A, Watson NF, et al. Overexpression of FLIPL is an independent marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5070–5075. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jonsson G, Paulie S, Grandien A. High level of cFLIP correlates with resistance to death receptor-induced apoptosis in bladder carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:1213–1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang X, Jin TG, Yang H, et al. Persistent c-FLIP(L) expression is necessary and sufficient to maintain resistance to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated apoptosis in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64:7086–7091. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mawji IA, Simpson CD, Hurren R, et al. Critical role for Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin-1-converting enzyme-like inhibitory protein in anoikis resistance and distant tumor formation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:811–822. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilson TR, McLaughlin KM, McEwan M, et al. c-FLIP: a key regulator of colorectal cancer cell death. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5754–5762. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Siegmund D, Hadwiger P, Pfizenmaier K, Vornlocher HP, Wajant H. Selective inhibition of FLICE-like inhibitory protein expression with small interfering RNA oligonucleotides is sufficient to sensitize tumor cells for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mol Med. 2002;8:725–732. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharp DA, Lawrence DA, Ashkenazi A. Selective knockdown of the long variant of cellular FLICE inhibitory protein augments death receptor-mediated caspase-8 activation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19401–19409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413962200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wilson TR, Redmond KM, McLaughlin KM, et al. Procaspase 8 overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer promotes apoptosis induced by FLIP silencing. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1352–1361. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Takeda K, Hayakawa Y, Smyth MJ, et al. Involvement of tumor necrosis factorrelated apoptosis-inducing ligand in surveillance of tumor metastasis by liver natural killer cells. Nat Med. 2001;7:94–100. doi: 10.1038/83416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Takeda K, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosisinducing ligand (TRAIL) contributes to interferon gamma-dependent natural killer cell protection from tumor metastasis. J Exp Med. 2001;193:661–670. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.6.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Grosse-Wilde A, Voloshanenko O, Bailey SL, et al. TRAIL-R deficiency in mice enhances lymph node metastasis without affecting primary tumor development. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:100–110. doi: 10.1172/JCI33061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhuang L, Lee CS, Scolyer RA, et al. Progression in melanoma is associated with decreased expression of death receptors for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosisinducing ligand. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1286–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Spierings DC, de Vries EG, Timens W, et al. Expression of TRAIL and TRAIL death receptors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:3397–3405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ganten TM, Sykora J, Koschny R, et al. Prognostic significance of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor expression in patients with breast cancer. J Mol Med. 2009;87:995–1007. doi: 10.1007/s00109-009-0510-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Macher-Goeppinger S, Aulmann S, Tagscherer KE, et al. Prognostic value of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and TRAIL receptors in renal cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:650–659. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Trauzold A, Siegmund D, Schniewind B, et al. TRAIL promotes metastasis of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncogene. 2006;25:7434–7439. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hoogwater FJ, Nijkamp MW, Smakman N, et al. Oncogenic K-Ras turns death receptors into metastasis-promoting receptors in human and mouse colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2357–2367. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen G, Bhojani MS, Heaford AC, et al. Phosphorylated FADD induces NF-kappaB, perturbs cell cycle, and is associated with poor outcome in lung adenocarcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12507–12512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500397102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stupack DG, Teitz T, Potter MD, et al. Potentiation of neuroblastoma metastasis by loss of caspase-8. Nature. 2006;439:95–99. doi: 10.1038/nature04323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barbero S, Mielgo A, Torres V, et al. Caspase-8 association with the focal adhesion complex promotes tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3755–3763. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Senft J, Helfer B, Frisch SM. Caspase-8 interacts with the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to regulate cell adhesion and motility. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11505–11509. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Finlay D, Vuori K. Novel noncatalytic role for caspase-8 in promoting SRC-mediated adhesion and Erk signaling in neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11704–11711. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Helfer B, Boswell BC, Finlay D, et al. Caspase-8 promotes cell motility and calpain activity under nonapoptotic conditions. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4273–4278. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Torres VA, Mielgo A, Barbero S, et al. Rab5 mediates caspase-8-promoted cell motility and metastasis. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21:369–376. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-09-0769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen L, Park SM, Tumanov AV, et al. CD95 promotes tumour growth. Nature. 2010;465:492–496. doi: 10.1038/nature09075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kleber S, Sancho-Martinez I, Wiestler B, et al. Yes and PI3K bind CD95 to signal invasion of glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]