Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1995 Jan 25;23(2):230–237. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.2.230

Yeast transcriptional activator INO2 interacts as an Ino2p/Ino4p basic helix-loop-helix heteromeric complex with the inositol/choline-responsive element necessary for expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

S Schwank 1, R Ebbert 1, K Rautenstrauss 1, E Schweizer 1, H J Schüller 1
PMCID: PMC306659  PMID: 7862526

Abstract

Coordinate transcriptional control of yeast genes involved in phospholipid biosynthesis is mediated by the inositol/choline-responsive element (ICRE) contained in the respective promoter regions. Regulatory genes INO2 and INO4, both encoding basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins, are necessary for ICRE-dependent gene activation. By the use of size variants and by heterologous expression in E. coli we demonstrate that Ino2p and Ino4p are both necessary and sufficient for the formation of the previously described FAS binding factor 1, Fbf1, interacting with the ICRE. Formation of a heteromeric complex between Ino2p and Ino4p by means of the respective bHLH domains was demonstrated in vivo by the interaction of appropriate two-hybrid constructs and in vitro by Far-Western analyses. Neither Ino2p nor Ino4p binds to the ICRE as a homodimer. When fused to the DNA-binding domain of Gal4p, Ino2p but not Ino4p was able to activate a UASGAL-containing reporter gene even in the absence of the heterologous Fbf1 subunit. By deletion studies, two separate transcriptional activation domains were identified in the N-terminal part of Ino2p. Thus, the bHLH domains of Ino2p and Ino4p constitute the dimerization/DNA-binding module of Fbf1 mediating its interaction with the ICRE, while transcriptional activation is effected exclusively by Ino2p.

Full text

PDF
230

Images in this article

232Image
on p.232
233Image
on p.233
233Image
on p.233

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ambroziak J., Henry S. A. INO2 and INO4 gene products, positive regulators of phospholipid biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, form a complex that binds to the INO1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 1994 May 27;269(21):15344–15349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benezra R., Davis R. L., Lockshon D., Turner D. L., Weintraub H. The protein Id: a negative regulator of helix-loop-helix DNA binding proteins. Cell. 1990 Apr 6;61(1):49–59. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90214-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackwell T. K., Weintraub H. Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1104–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.2174572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.2006410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonner J. J. Vectors for the expression and analysis of DNA-binding proteins in yeast. Gene. 1991 Jul 31;104(1):113–118. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90475-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Caudy M., Vässin H., Brand M., Tuma R., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. daughterless, a Drosophila gene essential for both neurogenesis and sex determination, has sequence similarities to myc and the achaete-scute complex. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1061–1067. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90250-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cress W. D., Triezenberg S. J. Critical structural elements of the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. Science. 1991 Jan 4;251(4989):87–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1846049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edmondson D. G., Olson E. N. Helix-loop-helix proteins as regulators of muscle-specific transcription. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 15;268(2):755–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellenberger T., Fass D., Arnaud M., Harrison S. C. Crystal structure of transcription factor E47: E-box recognition by a basic region helix-loop-helix dimer. Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 15;8(8):970–980. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.8.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Pognonec P., Roeder R. G., Burley S. K. Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF. EMBO J. 1994 Jan 1;13(1):180–189. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06247.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ferré-D'Amaré A. R., Prendergast G. C., Ziff E. B., Burley S. K. Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain. Nature. 1993 May 6;363(6424):38–45. doi: 10.1038/363038a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989 Jul 20;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henikoff S. Unidirectional digestion with exonuclease III creates targeted breakpoints for DNA sequencing. Gene. 1984 Jun;28(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hirsch J. P., Henry S. A. Expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae inositol-1-phosphate synthase (INO1) gene is regulated by factors that affect phospholipid synthesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;6(10):3320–3328. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.10.3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoshizaki D. K., Hill J. E., Henry S. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae INO4 gene encodes a small, highly basic protein required for derepression of phospholipid biosynthetic enzymes. J Biol Chem. 1990 Mar 15;265(8):4736–4745. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaelin W. G., Jr, Krek W., Sellers W. R., DeCaprio J. A., Ajchenbaum F., Fuchs C. S., Chittenden T., Li Y., Farnham P. J., Blanar M. A. Expression cloning of a cDNA encoding a retinoblastoma-binding protein with E2F-like properties. Cell. 1992 Jul 24;70(2):351–364. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90108-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim T. K., Roeder R. G. Transcriptional activation in yeast by the proline-rich activation domain of human CTF1. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 5;268(28):20866–20869. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kretzner L., Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Myc and Max proteins possess distinct transcriptional activities. Nature. 1992 Oct 1;359(6394):426–429. doi: 10.1038/359426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leuther K. K., Salmeron J. M., Johnston S. A. Genetic evidence that an activation domain of GAL4 does not require acidity and may form a beta sheet. Cell. 1993 Feb 26;72(4):575–585. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma J., Ptashne M. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell. 1987 Mar 13;48(5):847–853. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90081-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma P. C., Rould M. A., Weintraub H., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of MyoD bHLH domain-DNA complex: perspectives on DNA recognition and implications for transcriptional activation. Cell. 1994 May 6;77(3):451–459. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mellor J., Jiang W., Funk M., Rathjen J., Barnes C. A., Hinz T., Hegemann J. H., Philippsen P. CPF1, a yeast protein which functions in centromeres and promoters. EMBO J. 1990 Dec;9(12):4017–4026. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07623.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mitchell P. J., Tjian R. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):371–378. doi: 10.1126/science.2667136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Murre C., McCaw P. S., Baltimore D. A new DNA binding and dimerization motif in immunoglobulin enhancer binding, daughterless, MyoD, and myc proteins. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):777–783. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90682-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Myers A. M., Tzagoloff A., Kinney D. M., Lusty C. J. Yeast shuttle and integrative vectors with multiple cloning sites suitable for construction of lacZ fusions. Gene. 1986;45(3):299–310. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nikoloff D. M., Henry S. A. Functional characterization of the INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A positive regulator of phospholipid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7402–7411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nikoloff D. M., McGraw P., Henry S. A. The INO2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a helix-loop-helix protein that is required for activation of phospholipid synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Jun 25;20(12):3253–3253. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.12.3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ogawa N., Oshima Y. Functional domains of a positive regulatory protein, PHO4, for transcriptional control of the phosphatase regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2224–2236. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Regier J. L., Shen F., Triezenberg S. J. Pattern of aromatic and hydrophobic amino acids critical for one of two subdomains of the VP16 transcriptional activator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 1;90(3):883–887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sadowski I., Bell B., Broad P., Hollis M. GAL4 fusion vectors for expression in yeast or mammalian cells. Gene. 1992 Sep 1;118(1):137–141. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90261-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schüller H. J., Hahn A., Tröster F., Schütz A., Schweizer E. Coordinate genetic control of yeast fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2 by an upstream activation site common to genes involved in membrane lipid biosynthesis. EMBO J. 1992 Jan;11(1):107–114. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05033.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schüller H. J., Schorr R., Hoffmann B., Schweizer E. Regulatory gene INO4 of yeast phospholipid biosynthesis is positively autoregulated and functions as a transactivator of fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Nov 25;20(22):5955–5961. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.22.5955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schüller H. J., Schütz A., Knab S., Hoffmann B., Schweizer E. Importance of general regulatory factors Rap1p, Abf1p and Reb1p for the activation of yeast fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2. Eur J Biochem. 1994 Oct 1;225(1):213–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.00213.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Seipel K., Georgiev O., Schaffner W. A minimal transcription activation domain consisting of a specific array of aspartic acid and leucine residues. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1994 Jul;375(7):463–470. doi: 10.1515/bchm3.1994.375.7.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seipel K., Georgiev O., Schaffner W. Different activation domains stimulate transcription from remote ('enhancer') and proximal ('promoter') positions. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4961–4968. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05603.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sikorski R. S., Boeke J. D. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1991;194:302–318. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Singh H., LeBowitz J. H., Baldwin A. S., Jr, Sharp P. A. Molecular cloning of an enhancer binding protein: isolation by screening of an expression library with a recognition site DNA. Cell. 1988 Feb 12;52(3):415–423. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Staudinger J., Perry M., Elledge S. J., Olson E. N. Interactions among vertebrate helix-loop-helix proteins in yeast using the two-hybrid system. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 5;268(7):4608–4611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sun X. H., Copeland N. G., Jenkins N. A., Baltimore D. Id proteins Id1 and Id2 selectively inhibit DNA binding by one class of helix-loop-helix proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;11(11):5603–5611. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.11.5603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Triezenberg S. J., Kingsbury R. C., McKnight S. L. Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes Dev. 1988 Jun;2(6):718–729. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.6.718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Voronova A., Baltimore D. Mutations that disrupt DNA binding and dimer formation in the E47 helix-loop-helix protein map to distinct domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(12):4722–4726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES