Abstract
Etravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. ABC transporters potentially mediate clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. We assessed substrate characteristics and the inhibitory and inductive potential of etravirine on ABC transporters. Etravirine did not inhibit P-gp/ABCB1 and was not transported by the tested ABC transporters but was a potent inhibitor of BCRP/ABCG2. Etravirine induced several ABC transporters, especially BCRP/ABCG2. These data demonstrate that etravirine has the potential for drug-drug interactions by modulation of expression and function of several ABC transporters.
Etravirine is a novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. It is active against wild-type and some NNRTI-resistant HIV strains (1, 2) and offers a new treatment option for treatment-experienced patients. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions considerably influence efficacy and safety of antiretroviral therapy. Interactions might lower concentrations of antiretrovirals below therapeutic concentrations (5, 12, 14) and cause treatment failure and viral resistance. Interactions may also increase drug exposure and augment toxicity.
The main mechanisms of interaction in antiretroviral combination therapy involve the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) as well as efflux and uptake transporters. Crucial efflux transporters are several ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters that have been identified as important interaction sites of antiretroviral drugs (9-11). Relevant uptake transporters are the organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs/SLCOs) (6, 16, 20). Information on interactions of etravirine is sparse. We therefore investigated whether etravirine is a substrate of P-gp/ABCB1, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP1/ABCC1, MRP2/ABCC2, or MRP3/ABCC3 and whether it inhibits P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2. Furthermore, we investigated etravirine's potency to induce ABC transporters, important OATPs/SLCOs, CYPs, and the transcription factor pregnane X receptor.
Etravirine was obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, as etravirine TMC125 (catalog no. 11609) from Tibotec, Inc. Other materials were used as described previously (13). Etravirine was tested for cytotoxic effects prior to P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 inhibition assays with a cytotoxicity detection kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Cytotoxic concentrations were excluded in the respective assays. P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 inhibition was quantified by calcein and pheophorbide A efflux assays as described previously (23, 26). We used the growth inhibition assay in MDCKII cells overexpressing human P-gp/ABCB1 (7), BCRP/ABCG2 (17), and MRP1-3/ABCC1-3 (8) as a surrogate for substrate characteristics of etravirine as it has been described for other antiretroviral drugs (3, 13, 26). The induction assay, quantification of mRNA expression by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), and data evaluation by calibrator-normalized relative quantification with efficiency correction were also performed as published earlier (26).
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 5.02 and InStat version 3.06 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Statistical differences in mRNA expression and in 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) of proliferation assays were tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's post hoc test. Induction and repression were considered relevant only if mRNA expression differed from the baseline level by a factor of 1.5 or 0.67. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.
Proliferation assays in MDCKII cells and MDCKII cells overexpressing P-gp/ABCB1, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP1/ABCC1, MRP2/ABCC2, and MRP3/ABCC3 suggest that etravirine is not transported by these ABC transporters. P-gp/ABCB1-, BCRP/ABCG2-, and MRP3/ABCC3-overexpressing cells were even slightly less resistant toward etravirine than the parental cell line (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
IC50 values for proliferation inhibition in MDCKII cells overexpressing P-gp/ABCB1, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP1/ABCC1, MRP2/ABCC2, or MRP3/ABCC3
| Cell line | IC50etravirine (μmol/liter)a |
|---|---|
| MDCKII | 9.4 ± 0.4 |
| MDCKII-MDR1 | 7.6 ± 1.5* |
| MDCKII-BCRP | 6.0 ± 0.9** |
| MDCKII-MRP1 | 8.5 ± 0.5 |
| MDCKII-MRP2 | 7.8 ± 1.1 |
| MDCKII-MRP3 | 5.1 ± 0.4** |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD) from three to six experiments, with each concentration tested in octuplet. Statistical significance was evaluated using ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01 (compared to the untreated control).
Moreover, our results demonstrate that etravirine did not inhibit P-gp/ABCB1 up to the maximum tested concentration of 5 μmol/liter (maximum solubility in the buffer used) either in P388/dx or in L-MDR1 cells. These findings disagree with the summary of product characteristics of etravirine (Intelence) reporting weak inhibition of P-gp/ABCB1 by etravirine (22). However, these data are not publicly accessible, and thus assay conditions cannot be compared. Although we cannot exclude that etravirine inhibits P-gp/ABCB1 at higher concentrations, substantial inhibition appears unlikely because strong inhibitors like verapamil or quinidine exhibit IC50s below 5 μmol/liter, a concentration at which etravirine did not inhibit P-gp/ABCB1.
Our data for the first time demonstrate that etravirine is a very potent BCRP/ABCG2 inhibitor. In the BCRP/ABCG2 inhibition assay, etravirine increased pheophorbide A fluorescence in MDCKII-BCRP cells but not in the parental cell line MDCKII, indicating BCRP/ABCG2 inhibition (IC50 of 1.0 ± 0.4 μmol/liter). The IC50 was similar to the IC50 for fumitremorgin C (FTC) (0.7 ± 0.3 μmol/liter [25]), one of the most potent BCRP/ABCG2 inhibitors known. Effective etravirine concentrations match maximum plasma concentrations of etravirine, which have been reported to be in the range of 1.34 ± 0.36 μg/ml (equal to 3.1 μmol/liter, yielding 3.1 nmol/liter unbound drug) on day 8 after administration of the approved dosage of 200 mg twice daily (18). According to the FDA criteria developed for P-gp/ABCB1, this justifies further in vivo evaluation, because [I2]/IC50 is greater than 10 (with I2 equal to a dose/volume of 250 ml, which is the estimated intestinal concentration) (27). However, thus far the interaction between etravirine and typical BCRP/ABCG2 substrates has not been examined in clinical studies. The overall effect of induction and inhibition of ABCG2 as well as the abrogative influence of increased expression on inhibition is unknown.
Due to proliferation inhibition of LS180 cells at higher concentrations, etravirine was tested at 0.1 and 1.0 μmol/liter in the induction experiments. Induction of mRNA was analyzed after 4 days of treatment. Etravirine did not induce CYP2B6, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCC4, ABCC5, SLCO1B3, SLCO1B1, or PXR. It slightly induced ABCB1, ABCC3, CYP3A5, and SLCO2B1. mRNA expression of ABCG2 and CYP3A4 was strongly induced at a concentration of 1 μmol/liter by factors of 3.5 and 3.0, respectively (Fig. 1). Induction of P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 was also verified at the protein level by Western blotting after 7 days of incubation (Fig. 2). Semiquantification of the band intensities and normalization to the untreated medium control demonstrated an increase in P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 protein expression by factors of 1.8 and 2.8, respectively (at 1 μmol/liter etravirine).
FIG. 1.
Induction of mRNA expression by etravirine (0.1 and 1.0 μmol/liter) and the positive control rifampin (10 μmol/liter) in LS180 human adenocarcinoma cells, compared to expression for the medium control. Expression data were normalized to data for the reference gene glucuronidase β. Data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) from 8 to 12 experiments (4 biological replicates and 2 to 3 PCR runs for every sample). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01.
FIG. 2.
Representative P-gp/ABCB1 and BCRP/ABCG2 Western blot after 1 week of incubation in LS180 cells.
Evidence from clinical trials suggests that etravirine is less prone to drug-drug interactions than other NNRTIs (4, 15). Nevertheless, many drug-drug interactions have been described for this NNRTI, and for some interactions the mechanism is not clear. Our results demonstrate that etravirine induces the mRNA expression of ABCB1, ABCC3, CYP3A5, and SLCO2B1. So far, the clinical impact is not clear, because there are no clinical studies addressing this issue. In contrast, several in vivo studies confirm the induction of CYP3A4 that we observed in vitro. Induction of CYP3A4 manifests itself in reduced exposure of several concomitantly applied CYP3A4 substrates (4, 12). However, this induction appears to be less pronounced than that for other NNRTIs, because coadministration with etravirine does not lead to clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in all cases (12, 19).
The strong induction of BCRP/ABCG2 at the mRNA and protein levels indicated that etravirine not only is a PXR ligand but might also be a ligand for the aryl hydrocarbone receptor (AhR), being an important regulator of ABCG2 gene expression (21).
Comparing etravirine's drug interaction potential with those of older NNRTIs, these in vitro results as well as already published in vivo results indicate that etravirine has a lower susceptibility to drug-drug interactions than the older NNRTIs (Table 2) (4, 15).
TABLE 2.
In vitro transporter interaction profiles of NNRTIsa
| Tested function and transporter | Profileb for: |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etravirine | Delavirdine | Efavirenz | Nevirapine | |
| Substrate | ||||
| P-gp/ABCB1 | − | − | − | − |
| MRP1/ABCC1 | − | − | − | − |
| MRP2/ABCC2 | − | − | − | − |
| MRP3/ABCC3 | − | − | − | − |
| BCRP/ABCG2 | − | − | − | − |
| Inhibitor | ||||
| P-gp/ABCB1 | − | ++ | + | +/− |
| BCRP/ABCG2 | +++ | + | + | + |
| Inductor | ||||
| P-gp/ABCB1 | ++ | + | ++ | + |
| MRP1/ABCC1 | − | NT | + | NT |
| MRP3/ABCC3 | ++ | NT | ++ | NT |
| BCRP/ABCG2 | +++ | NT | ++ | NT |
| SLCO1B1 | − | NT | NT | NT |
Data for delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine were published in more detail previously (24).
−, no substrate/inhibitor/inductor; +/−, very weak inhibitor; +, substrate or weak inhibitor/inductor; ++, moderate inhibitor/inductor; +++, strong inhibitor/inductor; NT, not tested.
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that etravirine induces important pharmacological targets beyond CYP3A4 and strongly inhibits BCRP/ABCG2. Clinical drug-drug interaction studies should now evaluate the clinical significance of the identified inhibition and induction of BCRP/ABCG2 by etravirine.
Acknowledgments
We thank the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH, and Thermo Fisher Scientific for kindly providing etravirine.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 28 December 2010.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andries, K., et al. 2004. TMC125, a novel next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor active against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4680-4686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Azijn, H., et al. 2010. TMC278, a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), active against wild-type and NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:718-727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bierman, W. F. W., et al. 2010. Protease inhibitors atazanavir, lopinavir and ritonavir are potent blockers, but poor substrates, of ABC transporters in a broad panel of ABC transporter-overexpressing cell lines. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1672-1680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brown, K. C., S. Paul, and A. D. Kashuba. 2009. Drug interactions with new and investigational antiretrovirals. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 48:211-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dickinson, L., S. Khoo, and D. Back. 2010. Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of antiretrovirals: an update. Antiviral Res. 85:176-189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dixit, V., et al. 2007. Cytochrome P450 enzymes and transporters induced by anti-human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors in human hepatocytes: implications for predicting clinical drug interactions. Drug Metab. Dispos. 35:1853-1859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Evers, R., et al. 1997. Transport of glutathione prostaglandin A conjugates by the multidrug resistance protein 1. FEBS Lett. 419:112-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Evers, R., et al. 1998. Drug export activity of the human canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter in polarized kidney MDCK cells expressing cMOAT (MRP2) cDNA. J. Clin. Invest. 101:1310-1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huisman, M. T., et al. 2002. Multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2) transports HIV protease inhibitors, and transport can be enhanced by other drugs. AIDS 16:2295-2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huisman, M. T., J. W. Smit, and A. H. Schinkel. 2000. Significance of P-glycoprotein for the pharmacology and clinical use of HIV protease inhibitors. AIDS 14:237-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jones, K., et al. 2001. P-glycoprotein and transporter MRP1 reduce HIV protease inhibitor uptake in CD4 cells: potential for accelerated viral drug resistance? AIDS 15:1353-1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kakuda, T. N., M. Schöller-Gyüre, and R. M. W. Hoetelmans. 2010. Clinical perspective on antiretroviral drug-drug interactions with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor etravirine. Antivir. Ther. 15:817-829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.König, S. J., et al. 2010. Impact of drug transporters for the cellular resistance towards saquinavir and darunavir. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 11:2319-2328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mallolas, J., et al. 2007. Pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampicin and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in HIV-infected patients. HIV Med. 8:131-134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martínez, E., and M. Nelson. 2010. Simplification of antiretroviral therapy with etravirine. AIDS Rev. 12:52-59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niemi, M. 2007. Role of OATP transporters in the disposition of drugs. Pharmacogenomics 8:787-802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavek, P., et al. 2005. Human breast cancer resistance protein: interactions with steroid drugs, hormones, the dietary carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo(4,5-b)pyridine, and transport of cimetidine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 312:144-152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schöller-Gyüre, M., et al. 2010. Effects of hepatic impairment on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of etravirine 200 mg BID: an open-label, multiple-dose, controlled phase I study in adults. Clin. Ther. 32:328-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schöller-Gyüre, M., et al. 2008. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the concomitant administration of methadone and TMC125 in HIV-negative volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 48:322-329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Su, Y., X. Zhang, and P. J. Sinko. 2004. Human organic anion-transporting polypeptide OATP-A (SLC21A3) acts in concert with P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance protein 2 in the vectorial transport of saquinavir in Hep G2 cells. Mol. Pharm. 1:49-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan, K. P., et al. 2010. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor is a transcriptional activator of the human breast. Mol. Pharmacol. 78:175-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. July 2010. Full prescribing information Intelence (etravirine) tablets. Tibotec Therapeutics, Division of Centocor Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Raritan, NJ.
- 23.Weiss, J., et al. 2003. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305:197-204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weiss, J., and W. E. Haefeli. 2010. Impact of ATP-binding cassette transporters on human immunodeficiency virus. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 280:219-279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weiss, J., et al. 2010. Interaction of angiotensin receptor type 1 blockers with ATP-binding cassette transporters. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 31:150-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zembruski, N., et al. Potential of novel antiretrovirals to modulate expression and function of drug transporters in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Zhang, L., Y. D. Zhang, J. M. Strong, K. S. Reynolds, and S.-M. Huang. 2008. A regulatory viewpoint on transporter-based drug interactions. Xenobiotica 38:709-724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


