We thank Goude et al. for their extensive study of the role of embC (Rv3793) in ethambutol (EMB) resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (9). Their finding that the Thr270Ile change on its own plays no role in EMB resistance is of particular importance (9). Clinical studies had found this mutation in numerous EMB-resistant but also some EMB-sensitive isolates (13, 15, 16, 19-21). However, given that this mutation usually coincided with additional mutations in embCAB, its relevance for EMB resistance remained unclear (15).
We note that this particular embC single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) had been detected in a number of further instances but not discussed in the context of EMB resistance. First, it is present in Mycobacterium bovis AF2122/97 and the two closely related vaccine strains M. bovis BCG strain Pasteur 1173P2 and BCG strain Tokyo 172, both of which are sensitive to EMB (1, 8, 17, 18, 22). Second, it was found in all Mycobacterium africanum West African 1 strains (5444 04 and 11821 03) and West African 2 strains (4141 04 and GM 0981) sequenced as part of the M. tuberculosis Phylogeographic Diversity Sequencing Project (3, 7, 10). Third, it occurs in all M. tuberculosis Indo-Oceanic lineage 1 strains (K21, K93, T17, T83, and 95 0545), for which valid sequence information is available (7). Fourth, the orthologs of the closest, fully sequenced relatives of the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) (M. leprae TN, M. avium 104, M. avium k10, M. ulcerans Agy99, and M. marinum; deposited in the TB Database under gene family cluster ID 360180271) also display an Ile at this position (7). In contrast, all evolutionary “modern” M. tuberculosis strains (lineages 2 to 4) have the Thr (2, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 14, 23).
This demonstrates that Ile is the ancestral amino acid at position 270 of EmbC in MTBC rather than a marker for EMB resistance, which agrees with the findings by Goude et al. (9). Moreover, the geographic variation in the frequency of Thr270Ile in the aforementioned clinical studies is in line with this conclusion. With 47 and 32% of strains, this mutation was most common in two studies from India (20, 21). Conversely, lineage 1 strains are known not to be frequent in either Germany or Uzbekistan, as confirmed by the fact that Thr270Ile was found only in 3% of strains (6, 10, 15).
Ed. Note: The authors of the published article declined to respond.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brosch, R., et al. 2007. Genome plasticity of BCG and impact on vaccine efficacy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:5596-5601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cole, S. T., et al. 1998. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature 393:537-544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Comas, I., S. Homolka, S. Niemann, and S. Gagneux. 2009. Genotyping of genetically monomorphic bacteria: DNA sequencing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis highlights the limitations of current methodologies. PLoS One 4:e7815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Das, S., R. Yennamalli, A. Vishnoi, P. Gupta, and A. Bhattacharya. 2009. Single-nucleotide variations associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis KwaZulu-Natal strains. J. Biosci. 34:397-404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fleischmann, R. D., et al. 2002. Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J. Bacteriol. 184:5479-5490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gagneux, S., and P. M. Small. 2007. Global phylogeography of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and implications for tuberculosis product development. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7:328-337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galagan, J., et al. 2010. TB database 2010: overview and update. Tuberculosis (Edinb.) 90:225-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garnier, T., et al. 2003. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:7877-7882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goude, R., A. Amin, D. Chatterjee, and T. Parish. 2009. The arabinosyltransferase EmbC is inhibited by ethambutol in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4138-4146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hershberg, R., et al. 2008. High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography. PLoS Biol. 6:e311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ioerger, T., et al. 2010. Variation among genome sequences of H37Rv strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from multiple laboratories. J. Bacteriol. 192:3645-3653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ioerger, T., et al. 2009. Genome analysis of multi- and extensively-drug-resistant tuberculosis from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PLoS One 4:e7778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jadaun, G., et al. 2009. Role of embCAB gene mutations in ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from India. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33:483-486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Niemann, S., et al. 2009. Genomic diversity among drug sensitive and multidrug resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with identical DNA fingerprints. PLoS One 4:e7407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Plinke, C., et al. 2010. embCAB sequence variation among ethambutol-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates without embB306 mutation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1359-1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ramaswamy, S. V., et al. 2000. Molecular genetic analysis of nucleotide polymorphisms associated with ethambutol resistance in human isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:326-336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ritz, N., et al. 2009. Susceptibility of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine strains to antituberculous antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:316-318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seki, M., et al. 2009. Whole genome sequence analysis of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Tokyo 172: a comparative study of BCG vaccine substrains. Vaccine 27:1710-1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sreevatsan, S., et al. 1997. Ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: critical role of embB mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:1677-1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Srivastava, S., A. Ayyagari, T. Dhole, K. Nyati, and S. Dwivedi. 2009. emb nucleotide polymorphisms and the role of embB306 mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to ethambutol. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 299:269-280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Srivastava, S., et al. 2006. Nucleotide polymorphism associated with ethambutol resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr. Microbiol. 53:401-405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Trovero, A., C. Argüelles, and A. Cataldi. 2010. Preparation of a working seed lot of BCG and quality control by PCR genotyping. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 42:4-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zheng, H., et al. 2008. Genetic basis of virulence attenuation revealed by comparative genomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra versus H37Rv. PLoS One 3:e2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]