Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2011 Jan 14;77(5):1878–1880. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02691-10

Detection of Cryptosporidium molnari Oocysts from Fish by Fluorescent-Antibody Staining Assays for Cryptosporidium spp. Affecting Humans

Rona Barugahare 1, Michelle M Dennis 1, Joy A Becker 1, Jan Šlapeta 1,*
PMCID: PMC3067297  PMID: 21239548

Abstract

Three direct fluorescent-antibody staining assay kits for the detection of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species were used to detect Cryptosporidium molnari from Murray cod, and the cryptosporidia were characterized by using small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA). To facilitate rapid diagnosis of infection, this study demonstrated that all three kits detected fresh C. molnari and two kits detected formalin-fixed oocysts.


Cryptosporidiosis is a waterborne disease caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Cryptosporidium (Apicomplexa). It has debilitating effects in both humans and production animals and is characterized by diarrhea and general symptoms of gastrointestinal disease (5, 7). Two genotypes are the most common causes of human cryptosporidiosis, and these are the zoonotic C. pestis (or the C. parvum “bovine genotype”) and the human-specific C. hominis (or the C. parvum “human genotype”) (8, 19-21). Direct fluorescent-antibody staining assays are routinely used for diagnosing gastrointestinal cryptosporidiosis in humans and domestic mammals and are considered the gold standard because of their high sensitivity and specificity (11, 12, 16).

There is a great diversity of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes recorded from mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians as well as fish (8, 19). Cryptosporidiosis is an emerging disease in both wild and farmed fish in numerous countries worldwide (9, 14, 18). Expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive histopathology and PCR have been used to diagnose cryptosporidiosis (14, 23). The aim of this study was to apply human direct fluorescent-antibody staining assays for Cryptosporidium to detect the fish parasite. We tested three commercially available monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based assays for their capacities for detecting fresh and formalin-fixed oocysts of Cryptosporidium molnari in fish.

Sample collection and processing.

All samples for C. molnari detection were from a grow-out farm for Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii). Thirty-four 6-month-old fish (70 to 100 mm in length) that were smaller than normal and exhibiting spiral swimming were collected from a single tank. Twelve fish were frozen at −20°C, and 22 were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin. For the latter group, histopathological examination (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]) revealed the presence of C. molnari in the stomachs of 21 of 22 (95%) of the fish.

Fish stomach dissection.

The stomachs were dissected from the frozen fish (n = 12), and mucosal scrapings were taken (approximately 50 mg). An aliquot of the scraping was placed directly onto a microscope slide for testing, and the remainder was mixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin (0.5 ml) in an Eppendorf tube and thoroughly homogenized using a vortex.

Direct fluorescence assay kits.

Three fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-Cryptosporidium sp. MAbs in direct fluorescent-antibody staining assay kits for diagnosis of human cryptosporidiosis were used according to the manufacturers' instructions. Test 1 was the Crypto Cel immunofluorescence (IF) test (Cellabs, Brookvale, New South Wales, Australia), test 2 was the BTP Giardia/Cryptosporidium combined antigen detection kit (Biotech Trading Partners, CA, and Banksia Scientific, Bulimba, Queensland, Australia), and test 3 was the MeriFluor Cryptosporidium/Giardia test (Meridian Bioscience, OH, and Immuno, St. Peters, South Australia, Australia). Slides were examined on an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped for FITC fluorescence (maximum excitation wavelength, 490 nm; mean emission wavelength, 530 nm) and with an Olympus DP70 camera. Under fluorescent light, the positive controls showed bright green spherical Cryptosporidium oocysts (i.e., 4 to 5 μm in diameter).

SSU rDNA gene amplification and sequencing.

Nucleic acid was extracted from a gastric scraping (∼20 mg) that contained C. molnari by using the FastDNA soil kit with a Fast Prep-24 (MP Biomedicals, Australia); the speed setting used was 6.0 for 40 s. Nested PCR amplification of a fragment of small-subunit (SSU) ribosomal DNA (rDNA) was applied according to the method of Ryan et al. (17). A PCR product of approximately 550 bp was directly sequenced at AGRF (Westmead, New South Wales, Australia) and analyzed by using CLC Main Workbench 5.5 software (CLC bio, Denmark).

Sequence analysis of SSU rDNA.

The obtained sequence of the C. molnari SSU rDNA was 99.3% (526/530 nucleotides [nt]) identical to that of C. molnari in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) from Spain (15) and 99.8% (404/405 nt) identical to that of C. molnari in the butter bream (Monodactylus argenteus) from Spain (23).

Rapid detection of Cryptosporidium molnari oocysts.

Test 1 (the Crypto Cel IF test) detected oocysts in 92% (11/12) of the fish samples, which corresponds to the 95% prevalence determined by histology. The oocysts of C. molnari were spherical and 4 to 5 μm in diameter, and they occasionally showed an incomplete suture line of the oocyst wall (1) (Fig. 1A). Three fresh fish stomachs tested positive for Cryptosporidium by test 1 (Crypto Cel IF Test) as well as test 2 (BTP Giardia/Cryptosporidium combined antigen detection kit) and test 3 (MeriFluor Cryptosporidium/Giardia test) (Table 1). Oocysts labeled with test 3 in fresh samples fluoresced weakly and were difficult to visualize against the counterstain. Formalin fixation for 24 h did not reduce the FITC fluorescence of C. molnari oocysts by test 1 (4 of 4 samples testing positive) and test 2 (4 of 4 samples testing positive) (Table 1). Shorter fixation (5 min, 30 min, 2 h, or 6 h; 3 samples each) did not reduce FITC labeling for C. molnari oocysts by test 1. Test 3 did not label C. molnari after formalin fixation for 24 h (0/4 samples), although structures similar in size and shape to C. molnari oocysts were observed, and they had a yellow fluorescence. Formalin fixation for 4 (1/1 sample), 7 (6/6 samples), and 9 (2/2 samples) days had no effect on the oocyst labeling using test 1 (Fig. 1B), and formalin fixation for 7 (3/3 samples) days had no effect on labeling using test 2. Material fixed for 63 days appeared to have weaker fluorescence than fresh oocysts with test 1 (1/1 sample) and test 2 (1/1 sample), and this was weaker than the bright FITC fluorescence of the positive control. Test 3 did not label C. molnari oocysts that had been fixed for 7 (0/3 samples) and 63 (0/1 sample) days (Table 1).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Direct fluorescent-antibody staining of Cryptosporidium molnari oocysts. A fresh oocyst (A) and an oocyst fixed in formalin for 7 days (B) are shown. FITC-conjugated anti-Cryptosporidium sp. MAbs (Crypto Cel IF test; Cellabs, Australia) were used. The oocysts exhibit the typical semicircular longitudinal suture in the oocyst wall. Bar, 5 μm.

TABLE 1.

Detection of fresh and formalin-fixed oocysts of Cryptosporidium molnaria

Test no. No. of samples positive for C. molnari/total
Unfixed Formalin fixed
24 h 7 days 63 days
1 3/3 4/4 6/6 1/1
2 3/3 4/4 3/3 1/1
3 3/3 0/4 0/3 0/1
a

Test 1 was the Crypto Cel IF test, test 2 was the BTP Giardia/Cryptosporidium combined antigen detection kit, and test 3 was the MeriFluor Cryptosporidium/Giardia test.

Conclusions.

We successfully labeled C. molnari by using existing direct fluorescence assays designed for diagnosis of human cryptosporidiosis. These assays can be readily used to diagnose outbreaks of clinical cryptosporidiosis in farmed freshwater fish, as demonstrated here for the Murray cod samples with comparable sensitivity results with histology. Selection of the appropriate assay is important for accurate diagnosis because (i) one of the three tests did not label oocysts consistently after formalin fixation, (ii) the tests had weak labeling of C. molnari oocysts 63 days postfixation, and (iii) formalin fixation is a very common technique for preserving samples for disease investigation.

The differences between MAb labeling of C. molnari and that of the positive control (zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp.) imply vulnerability of the oocyst antigens to formalin, especially the epitope recognized by the MAb in test 3. Formalin progressively cross-links proteins (including antigen epitopes) of the oocyst wall, possibly inhibiting successful labeling with MAbs (2-4, 6, 22). The cross-reactivity of the MAb tests illustrates the distinct evolutionary trajectory of the piscine clade of C. molnari and mammalian Cryptosporidium spp. (15). The FITC-conjugated anti-Cryptosporidium sp. MAb in test 3 was previously shown to label gastric C. serpentis from snakes preserved in formalin (12) and gastric Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts from farmed Xenopus laevis frogs (13). Assuming that the fish C. molnari is ancestral to the gastric species and the intestinal zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp. (15), the oocyst surface antigen was under selection pressure to become more resilient while the oocyst morphology remained the same.

Traditionally, the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis in fish has been conducted on samples collected postmortem, often requiring the sacrifice of stock. This study demonstrated that existing direct fluorescent-antibody staining assays detect oocysts of C. molnari from fish and therefore have advantages over histology and even PCR by being rapid (1 to 1.5 h turnaround time), cheaper, and simpler to perform. Similar to the case for a rapid medical response, a direct immunofluorescence assay is preferred over virus isolation and real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for influenza A (H1N1) virus in respiratory specimens (10).

Direct fluorescent-antibody staining assays for Cryptosporidium are designed to work on fecal or even water samples after concentration, avoiding the necessity of sacrificing stock. Murray cod are an iconic Australian freshwater fish of high conservation value. Undiagnosed C. molnari infections allow the parasite to be moved across catchments or states with live fish movements for restocking programs and aquaculture. Therefore, these tests may potentially be applied to both wild and farmed fish for the purposes of routine health checks, stock quarantine, and epidemiological studies.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The nucleotide sequence of the SSU rDNA of C. molnari in the Murray cod was deposited in GenBank under the accession number HQ585890.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 January 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alvarez-Pellitero, P., and A. Sitjà-Bobadilla. 2002. Cryptosporidium molnari n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) infecting two marine fish species, Sparus aurata L. and Dicentrarchus labrax L. Int. J. Parasitol. 32:1007-1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arnold, M. M., et al. 1996. Effects of fixation and tissue processing on immunohistochemical demonstration of specific antigens. Biotech. Histochem. 71:224-230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Battifora, H., and M. Kopinski. 1986. The influence of protease digestion and duration of fixation on the immunostaining of keratins. A comparison of formalin and ethanol fixation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 34:1095-1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bonnin, A., J. F. Dubremetz, and P. Camerlynck. 1991. Characterization and immunolocalization of an oocyst wall antigen of Cryptosporidium parvum (Protozoa, Apicomplexa). Parasitology 103:171-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chalmers, R. M., and A. P. Davies. 2010. Minireview: clinical cryptosporidiosis. Exp. Parasitol. 124:138-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Entrala, E., Y. Sbihi, M. Sanchez-Moreno, and C. Mascaro. 2001. Antigen incorporation on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst walls. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 96:233-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fayer, R. (ed.). 1997. Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • 8.Fayer, R. 2010. Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Exp. Parasitol. 124:90-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gabor, L., et al. Cryptosporidiosis in intensively reared Barramundi (Lates calcarifer). J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 10.Ganzenmueller, T., et al. 2010. Comparison of the performance of direct fluorescent antibody staining, a point-of-care rapid antigen test and virus isolation with that of RT-PCR for the detection of novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus in respiratory specimens. J. Med. Microbiol. 59:713-717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Garcia, L. S., A. C. Shum, and D. A. Bruckner. 1992. Evaluation of a new monoclonal-antibody combination reagent for direct fluorescence detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium oocysts in human fecal specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3255-3257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Graczyk, T. K., M. R. Cranfield, and R. Fayer. 1995. A comparative assessment of direct fluorescence antibody, modified acid-fast stain, and sucrose flotation techniques for detection of Cryptosporidium serpentis oocysts in snake fecal specimens. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 26:396-402. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Green, S. L., D. M. Bouley, C. A. Josling, and R. Fayer. 2003. Cryptosporidiosis associated with emaciation and proliferative gastritis in a laboratory-reared South African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis). Comp. Med. 53:81-84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Murphy, B. G., D. Bradway, T. Walsh, G. E. Sanders, and K. Snekvik. 2009. Gastric cryptosporidiosis in freshwater angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 21:722-727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palenzuela, O., P. Alvarez-Pellitero, and A. Sitjà-Bobadilla. 2010. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium molnari reveals a distinct piscine clade. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7646-7649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rimhanen-Finne, R., H. L. Enemark, J. Kolehmainen, P. Toropainen, and M. L. Hanninen. 2007. Evaluation of immunofluorescence microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in asymptomatic dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 145:345-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ryan, U., et al. 2003. Identification of novel Cryptosporidium genotypes from the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4302-4307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sitjà-Bobadilla, A., F. Padros, C. Aguilera, and P. Alvarez-Pellitero. 2005. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium molnari in Spanish gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) cultures: from hatchery to market size. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:131-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Šlapeta, J. 2009. Centenary of the genus Cryptosporidium: from morphological to molecular species identification, p. 31-50. In M. G. Ortega-Pierres et al. (ed.), Giardia and Cryptosporidium: from molecules to disease. CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
  • 20.Šlapeta, J. 2006. Cryptosporidium species found in cattle: a proposal for a new species. Trends Parasitol. 22:469-474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xiao, L., R. Fayer, U. Ryan, and S. J. Upton. 2004. Cryptosporidium taxonomy: recent advances and implications for public health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:72-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu, J. R., S. P. O'Hara, J. L. C. Lin, M. E. Dailey, and G. Cain. 2002. A common oocyst surface antigen of Cryptosporidium recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Parasitol. Res. 88:412-420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zanguee, N., et al. 2010. Identification of novel Cryptosporidium species in aquarium fish. Vet. Parasitol. 174:43-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES