Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2011 Jan 18;79(4):1498–1503. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01196-10

Toll-Like Receptor 5 Stimulation Protects Mice from Acute Clostridium difficile Colitis

Irene Jarchum 1,*, Mingyu Liu 1, Lauren Lipuma 1, Eric G Pamer 1,*
PMCID: PMC3067529  PMID: 21245274

Abstract

Clostridium difficile is a spore-forming bacterium that infects the lower intestinal tract of humans and is the most common known cause of diarrhea among hospitalized patients. Clostridium difficile colitis is mediated by toxins and develops during or following antibiotic administration. We have used a murine model of C. difficile infection, which reproduces the major features of the human disease, to study the effect of innate immune activation on resistance to C. difficile infection. We found that administration of purified Salmonella-derived flagellin, a Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) agonist, protects mice from C. difficile colitis by delaying C. difficile growth and toxin production in the colon and cecum. TLR5 stimulation significantly improves pathological changes in the cecum and colon of C. difficile-infected mice and reduces epithelial cell loss. Flagellin treatment reduces epithelial apoptosis in the large intestine, thereby protecting the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier during C. difficile infection. We demonstrate that restoring intestinal innate immune tone by TLR stimulation in antibiotic-treated mice ameliorates intestinal inflammation and prevents death from C. difficile colitis, potentially providing an approach to prevent C. difficile-induced pathology.


Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming rod that is acquired by oral ingestion of spores and occurs most commonly in hospitals and long-term health care facilities (27). Perturbation of the normal intestinal microflora by antibiotics generally precedes the development of C. difficile colitis, which is mediated by toxins and is associated with a spectrum of illnesses that extend from mild to severe diarrhea and that can escalate to life-threatening toxic megacolon. C. difficile infection is the most common known cause of diarrhea among hospitalized patients, and its incidence, as well as the severity of C. difficile infection, has increased over the last decade (13). It is estimated that the cost of this disease exceeds $1.1 billion in the United States annually (16).

C. difficile produces two toxins, toxin A and toxin B, which are endocytosed via clathrin-coated vesicles (24). Both toxins are potential virulence factors (15) and, upon entering the cytoplasm, monoglucosylate Rho GTPases, thereby inactivating them. Subsequent cytoskeletal disruption results in loss of tight junctions and compromises the integrity of the intestinal mucosa (7, 23, 29, 34). It has been postulated that C. difficile toxins reach the lamina propria after disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier and target immune cell populations such as monocytes, macrophages, and T cells, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines and macrophage and T cell death (20, 22, 27).

The mechanism by which antibiotics lead to markedly increased susceptibility to C. difficile infection is not clear. The intestinal commensal flora, which plays a critical role in maintenance of innate and adaptive immune homeostasis, is depleted by antibiotic treatment (10). Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize pathogen-derived molecular patterns and activate innate immune pathways. TLR signaling is decreased in mice that undergo antibiotic treatment (2, 14), rendering the host more susceptible to infection.

MyD88, an adaptor protein required for signaling through most TLRs, is required for resistance to intestinal infections (26). MyD88 signaling protects the intestinal epithelium from severe damage and from passage of bacteria across the epithelial cell barrier during infection with the mouse colonic pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (18). In a mouse model of C. difficile infection, MyD88-deficient mice are more susceptible to the development of colitis than wild-type mice, underscoring the critical role of TLR signaling in defense against C. difficile (17). However, the mechanisms contributing to resistance against C. difficile infection remain poorly elucidated, in part due to the fact that mouse models for the disease have only recently been reported (5, 17). The hamster model of C. difficile colitis, in which disease is acute and principally affects the cecum, has been used extensively to investigate in vivo pathogenesis (1). The use of mice for the study of C. difficile colitis has several advantages, including the availability of genetically altered animals, a broad range of reagents to study immune responses, and a colitis model that affects the colon and cecum (5).

Our laboratory demonstrated that exogenous administration of TLR ligands restricts intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) (2, 14). Both oral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and systemic flagellin (TLR4 and TLR5 agonists, respectively) dramatically decrease VRE colonization upon administration to antibiotic-treated mice. Administration of flagellin, in contrast to LPS, is less inflammatory and is not associated with sepsis and severe organ pathology (6, 33). TLR5 stimulation by truncated flagellin has also been shown to protect mice from the harmful effects of radiation on the intestine (4, 33).

Here we investigated whether TLR5 ligation enhances resistance to C. difficile infection. We found that flagellin protects mice from lethal C. difficile infection. Flagellin inhibits C. difficile growth in the intestine during the first 24 h following inoculation, prevents the development of intestinal pathology, and protects the intestinal epithelial barrier. This is the first report demonstrating that targeted TLR stimulation can protect against C. difficile infection. These studies contribute to our understanding of resistance to C. difficile and provide a basis for the potential development of therapeutics that enhance the safety of antibiotic administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice and infection regimen.

C57BL/6 female mice (6 to 8 weeks of age) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. TLR5-deficient mice were provided by R. Flavell (Yale University, New Haven, CT), and the colony is maintained at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) by mating of TLR5−/− × TLR5−/−. Mice received antibiotic treatment prior to C. difficile infection as follows. Antibiotics (kanamycin, 0.4 mg/ml; gentamicin, 0.035 mg/ml; colistin, 850 U/ml, metronidazole, 0.215 mg/ml; and vancomycin, 0.045 mg/ml) were administered in the drinking water on days −6 to −3. On day −3, mice were provided regular drinking water. On day −1, animals received a single dose of clindamycin (200 μg) intraperitoneally, and they were infected on day 0 with 103 CFU C. difficile strain VPI 10463 spores by gavage. Mice received flagellin (15 μg in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) or PBS intraperitoneally on the days indicated for each experiment. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium-derived flagellin was used for all experiments (InvivoGen). All mice were maintained in a specific-pathogen-free facility at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Animal Resource Center. Age- and gender-matched animals were used for all experiments. Experiments were approved under institutional guidelines (IACUC protocol 00-05-066).

C. difficile culture.

C. difficile strain VPI 10463 (ATCC 43255) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in BHIS media at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Labs). After a single colony was obtained, bacteria were patched onto BHIS agar. Ten days later, bacteria were recovered from the plates and spores were obtained as previously described (28). Briefly, spores were released from the mother cell by multiple washes in ice-cold PBS. Pellets were resuspended in 20% HistoDenz (Sigma-Aldrich), layered onto 50% HistoDenz, and centrifuged at 15,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min. The HistoDenz gradient separates spores from vegetative bacteria (28). The absence of live vegetative bacteria was confirmed by microscopic examination and the inability to grow in the absence of taurocholate. After isolation of pelleted spores, they were washed five times in ice-cold PBS.

Quantitative culture of C. difficile spores and vegetative forms.

Stool pellets or intestinal contents from ileum, cecum, or colon were suspended in deoxygenated PBS. Ten-fold dilutions of the suspension were plated anaerobically on BHIS plates containing taurocholate, d-cycloserine, and cefoxitin for specific selection of C. difficile and maximum recovery of both vegetative and spore forms of C. difficile. The suspension was then wet heated at 60οC for 20 min to kill vegetative forms and then plated on BHIS plates containing taurocholate, d-cycloserine, and cefoxitin in order to quantify the number of C. difficile spores in the intestinal contents or the stool samples. Plates were placed in a 37°C incubator within the anaerobic chamber overnight.

C. difficile toxin A and toxin B determination.

The presence of C. difficile toxins was determined using a cell-based cytotoxicity assay. Human embryonic lung fibroblast WI-38 cells (ATCC) were plated at 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate overnight for formation of a monolayer. Intestinal or fecal contents were resuspended in sterile PBS and spun at 10, 000 × g for 10 min. Ten-fold dilutions of the supernatant were incubated with either PBS or antitoxin antisera (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA) for 20 min at room temperature. These were then added to WI-38 cells for overnight incubation, after which the effect of intestinal content supernatants on cell rounding was assessed. The presence of C. difficile toxins A and B was confirmed by neutralization by antitoxin antisera. Data are expressed as the log10 reciprocal value of the first dilution at which cell rounding was not observed.

Histologic analysis of cecum and colon.

Cecum and colon tissues were removed from mice, fixed in biopsy specimen-embedding cassettes using freshly made ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde or Carnoy's fixative, and incubated overnight at 4°C. After fixation, the samples were washed twice with PBS and dehydrated prior to processing for embedding and sectioning. Tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The severity of enteritis was quantified using a grading system (12) that includes evaluation (on a scale of 0 to 3 for each parameter) of edema of the mucosa, inflammatory cell infiltration, epithelial cell loss, and goblet cell loss. Histologic analysis and scoring of these parameters was performed blindly by a single pathologist.

In vivo permeability assay.

To assess the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, mice were fasted for 4 h and were administered 15 mg fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran (average molecular weight, 3,000 to 5,000; Sigma-Aldrich) by gavage. Four hours later, mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation and bled by cardiac puncture. The presence of FITC-dextran was assessed in serum 4 h later (excitation, 485 nm; emission, 530 nm) (35).

Statistical analysis.

Student's t test was used throughout the study, except for survival curves, for which the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used.

RESULTS

Flagellin protects against C. difficile colitis.

To determine if flagellin can protect mice from development of C. difficile colitis and death, we challenged mice with C. difficile after pretreatment with an antibiotic regimen previously described to confer susceptibility to C. difficile infection (5) and described in detail in Materials and Methods. Briefly, mice received antibiotics in their drinking water from day −6 to day −3 and on day −1 received a single dose of clindamycin. Mice were infected with 103 CFU C. difficile spores by gavage on day 0, and on days −1, 0, and 1 they were treated with PBS or flagellin (15 μg per dose) intraperitoneally. Consistent with published reports of this mouse model (5), PBS-treated mice died within the first 5 days following infection. However, as shown in Fig. 1A, flagellin administration markedly protected mice from death, with 10% mortality in mice that received flagellin, compared to 70% mortality in PBS-treated mice (P = 0.0043). In Fig. 1B, five independent experiments are tabulated, which showed highly reproducible results, similar to those in Fig. 1A. Flagellin administration substantially protects antibiotic-treated mice from C. difficile-induced death.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Flagellin administration protects mice from C. difficile-induced death. Mice (n = 10 per group) received a cocktail of antibiotics in the drinking water on days −6 to −3 and were then switched to regular water. On day −1, mice received a single dose of clindamycin (200 μg) intraperitoneally, and they were infected with 103 CFU of C. difficile spores (strain VPI 10463) the following day. Mice received three doses of flagellin (15 μg) or PBS intraperitoneally on days −1, 0, and 1 and were followed for survival. The data shown in panel A are representative of those from several independent experiments, which are tabulated in panel B.

TLR5 expression is required for flagellin-mediated protection.

To demonstrate that flagellin-mediated protection is dependent on signaling through TLR5, we tested whether flagellin treatment can protect TLR5−/− mice from C. difficile colitis. To equilibrate the intestinal flora, TLR5−/− and C57BL/6 mice were cohoused for at least 2 weeks, which, based on our experience and that of others, allows transfer of bacterial species, including those that adhere tightly to the intestinal epithelium, between the animals (8, 11). Mice received antibiotics in the drinking water on days −6 to −3, followed by a single dose of clindamycin on day −1. Mice were infected with C. difficile spores on day 0 and received three doses of flagellin or PBS on days −1, 0, and 1. As shown in Fig. 2A, C57BL/6 mice that received flagellin were protected from C. difficile-induced death. In contrast, TLR5-deficient mice treated with flagellin succumbed to disease (Fig. 2B). C. difficile-infected C57BL/6 mice were protected from severe weight loss following treatment with flagellin (Fig. 2C). Flagellin-treated mice lost less than 10% of their weight, while mice that received PBS underwent approximately 20% weight loss after C. difficile infection. However, flagellin treatment did not protect TLR5-deficient mice from extreme weight loss (Fig. 2D). These results demonstrate that flagellin-mediated protection from C. difficile colitis requires TLR5 expression in the infected host.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

TLR5 expression is required for flagellin-mediated protection from C. difficile colitis. C57BL/6 and TLR5−/− mice were cohoused for at least 2 weeks prior to infection. Mice received antibiotics in the drinking water for 3 days and a single dose of clindamycin prior to infection with 103 CFU of C. difficile spores on day 0. (A) C57BL/6 mice received three doses of PBS or flagellin on days −1, 0, and 1 and were followed for survival. (B) TLR5-deficient mice that underwent the antibiotic regimen and received three doses of flagellin were not protected from C. difficile colitis. (C and D) Similar results were found when flagellin- and PBS-treated C57BL/6 (C) and TLR5−/− (D) were followed for weight loss. C57BL/6 mice that received PBS lost approximately 20% of their body weight, while mice that received flagellin were greatly protected from weight loss (P = 0.0146) (C). However, TLR5−/− mice that received flagellin (n = 9) were not protected from weight loss compared to mice that received PBS (n = 9) (D).

Lower burden of C. difficile early in infection.

We next investigated whether flagellin mediates protection by decreasing C. difficile growth in the intestine. We pretreated mice with antibiotics and challenged them with 103 CFU C. difficile. Mice received two doses of flagellin or PBS on days −1 and 0, and we sacrificed animals on day 1 (24 h following infection and the last dose of flagellin) and obtained samples of intestinal contents from cecum and colon. TLR5 stimulation in C. difficile-infected mice with flagellin lowered the density of C. difficile in the cecum and colon by a factor of approximately 10,000 (Fig. 3A). Further, while C. difficile toxin was present in high concentrations in mice that were not treated with flagellin, cytotoxicity was undetectable in the intestinal contents of flagellin-treated mice (Fig. 3B).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

TLR5 stimulation results in decreased CFU at 1 day postinfection. Mice were infected on day 0 with 103 CFU C. difficile spores following antibiotic treatment. Mice received two doses of PBS or flagellin on days −1 and 0 and were sacrificed at 24 h postinfection. (A) Vegetative C. difficile CFU (spores are generally undetectable at this time point) in cecum and colon were quantified. (B) Cytotoxicity in cecal and fecal contents was quantified using a cell-based assay. Results in panel A are representative of at least two independent experiments. For panel B, results from three independent experiments were pooled. ND, not detectable.

Flagellin prevents intestinal damage during C. difficile infection.

We next investigated whether TLR5 stimulation protects intestinal tissues from damage during C. difficile infection. Mice were pretreated with antibiotics and infected with 103 CFU C. difficile. On days −1, 0, and 1, mice received flagellin or PBS, and they were sacrificed on day 2 postinfection. Histologic analysis of colon (Fig. 4A and B) and cecum (Fig. 4A and C) from these mice revealed that TLR5 stimulation protects tissues of the lower intestine from damage. As shown in the representative images in Fig. 4A, at 2 days postinfection, inflammatory cell infiltration (mostly neutrophils), edema, and epithelial cell loss in the colon and cecum are evident in mice that received PBS. However, intestinal tissues and epithelial cells in flagellin-treated mice maintain structural integrity. Interestingly, we found that epithelial cell loss in the colon is significantly reduced in mice that received TLR5 stimulation (Fig. 4A and D), suggesting that flagellin administration protects intestinal epithelial cells from apoptosis and/or stimulates their replenishment.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

TLR5 stimulation prevents tissue damage in the lower intestine. Three groups of mice were treated with antibiotics and either kept uninfected or infected with 103 CFU C. difficile spores. Infected mice were treated with PBS or flagellin on days −1, 0, and 1. On day 2, mice were sacrificed and their colons and ceca were isolated and fixed. Histology sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin were scored for edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, epithelial cell loss, and goblet cell loss. Scale bars represent 200 μm for large images and 50 μm for insets. The colons (A and B) and ceca (A and C) of flagellin-treated mice are largely protected from tissue damage. Particularly, epithelial cell loss is greatly reduced in mice that received TLR5 stimulation (A and D). Representative tissue sections are shown in panel A. For panels B to D, results from two independent experiments were pooled. Each symbol represents one mouse.

Integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier is maintained in flagellin-treated mice.

We performed experiments to determine the effect of TLR5 stimulation on the intestinal epithelial barrier in C. difficile-infected mice. Antibiotic-treated mice were infected with C. difficile and received three doses of flagellin or PBS on days −1, 0, and 1. Mice were sacrificed on day 2, and cecal tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for detection of apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining (Fig. 5A). In contrast to the case for untreated mice, fewer epithelial cells undergo apoptosis in C. difficile-infected mice that received flagellin, suggesting that the integrity of the intestinal barrier may be maintained in these mice. Indeed, C. difficile-infected mice treated with flagellin have decreased permeability of the intestinal barrier to FITC-labeled dextran compared to PBS-treated mice. As shown in Fig. 5B, FITC-dextran was found in the sera of mice that received PBS. In contrast, FITC-dextran was detectable in flagellin-treated mice to the same extent as in uninfected mice. These experiments demonstrate that TLR5 stimulation maintains the integrity of the epithelial barrier in the intestine.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

Flagellin treatment protects against damage to the intestinal epithelial barrier. C57BL/6 mice received antibiotics in the drinking water on days −6 to −3 and a single dose of clindamycin on day −1. This was followed by infection by gavage with 103 CFU C. difficile spores and flagellin or PBS treatment on days −1, 0, and 1. (A) Mice were sacrificed at 2 days postinfection, and the cecum was obtained and stained for the detection of cell death with TUNEL. TUNEL-positive cells were quantified blindly. (B) At 2 days postinfection, mice were fasted from food and drink for 4 h and were administered 15 μg FITC-dextran by gavage. Four hours later, mice were sacrificed and bled by cardiac puncture, and the presence of FITC-dextran in serum was assessed. For panels A and B, results from two independent experiments were pooled.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that flagellin-mediated TLR5 stimulation protects mice from death during C. difficile colitis. We find that at 24 h after infection of antibiotic-treated mice with C. difficile, the density of C. difficile in mice that received flagellin is about 10,000 times lower than that in PBS-treated mice. Our experiments established that flagellin maintains the structural integrity of the epithelial layer of the large intestine during C. difficile infection. Striking edema and epithelial cell loss in PBS-treated mice contrasts with largely normal mucosal architecture of colonic and cecal tissues of flagellin-treated mice. Further, apoptosis is decreased in the large intestine and the epithelial intestinal barrier is protected in flagellin-treated mice infected with C. difficile.

Previous studies show that TLR5 stimulation limits the harmful effects of radiation by protecting the intestinal epithelial barrier (4). Administration of a truncated version of Salmonella-derived flagellin that retains the ability to stimulate NF-κB activation but has reduced toxicity and immunogenicity protects mice from a lethal dose of irradiation. Interestingly, that study also found that flagellin has an antiapoptotic effect on intestinal cells of irradiated mice and induces proliferation of crypt cells. Flagellin treatment has been shown to reduce inflammation and neutrophil infiltration in the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-colitis model (33). Recent studies show that mucosal administration of flagellin can protect against lung infection in murine models of acute pneumonia, underscoring the effectiveness of this TLR ligand in eliciting productive innate immune responses during infection (21, 36).

While C. difficile has a gene encoding flagellin (30), the main component of flagella, our experiments have not revealed higher susceptibility to C. difficile infection in TLR5-deficient mice. Therefore, we speculate that C. difficile- or microbiota-derived flagellin does not play a major role in eliciting a protective immune response upon infection. TLR5 is expressed on the basolateral surface of intestinal epithelial cells (9), on endothelial cells of the intestine (19), and on a subset of lamina propria dendritic cells (31). Therefore, C. difficile-derived flagellin would not signal through TLR5 until the intestinal epithelial barrier has been destroyed by the action of the toxins. At this time, however, the toxins themselves elicit a rapid and robust recruitment of immune cells and cytokine production (20, 22). It is likely that exogenous administration of flagellin, as we have done in our study, protects mice from C. difficile infection by triggering TLR5 signaling prior to disruption of the intestinal epithelial layer.

The mechanism by which flagellin prevents the accumulation of C. difficile in the large intestine is unclear. At least two scenarios are possible: first, flagellin may directly or indirectly inhibit C. difficile germination, or second, it may prevent C. difficile proliferation. Work from our laboratory has demonstrated that TLR stimulation in mice infected with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) results in decreased colonization with VRE. The antimicrobial peptide RegIIIγ, which is upregulated by LPS and flagellin administration, can kill VRE and other Gram-positive bacteria (2, 3, 14). Flagellin administration during C. difficile infection also leads to the upregulation of RegIIIγ expression in the large intestine (our unpublished results), and thus it is possible that RegIIIγ-mediated killing decreases the density of C. difficile within the first day following infection of antibiotic-treated mice.

TLR5 stimulation results in production of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-22 (IL-22) (14, 32), which is required for flagellin-mediated restriction of colonization by VRE (14). IL-22 is also crucial for resistance to the murine intestinal pathogen Citrobacter rodentium (37). IL-22 production in the gut activates the transcription factor STAT3 in epithelial cells, and specific depletion of STAT3 expression in intestinal epithelium leads to increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells (25). Further, IL-22 increases expression of RegIIIγ (14, 25). It is not known, however, whether IL-22 is required for TLR5-mediated protection against C. difficile infection.

A recent study indicates that MyD88-deficient mice have increased susceptibility to C. difficile infection (17), consistent with the notion that TLR signaling induced by the intestinal microbiota maintains homeostatic innate immune defenses, thereby conferring resistance to C. difficile colitis. It was unclear, however, whether specific TLR signaling is sufficient to prevent death following C. difficile infection of antibiotic-treated mice. In the present study we demonstrate for the first time that flagellin-mediated stimulation of TLR5 protects against C. difficile colitis. In hospitalized patients in whom antibiotic administration is unavoidable, TLR5 engagement by exogenous ligand administration may be a successful approach to ameliorate C. difficile infection.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants R01 AI042135 and R37 AI039031 to E.G.P.

Editor: R. P. Morrison

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 18 January 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abrams, G. D., M. Allo, G. D. Rifkin, R. Fekety, and J. Silva, Jr. 1980. Mucosal damage mediated by clostridial toxin in experimental clindamycin-associated colitis. Gut 21:493-499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brandl, K., et al. 2008. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci exploit antibiotic-induced innate immune deficits. Nature 455:804-807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brandl, K., G. Plitas, B. Schnabl, R. P. Dematteo, and E. G. Pamer. 2007. MyD88-mediated signals induce the bactericidal lectin RegIIIgamma and protect mice against intestinal Listeria monocytogenes infection. J. Exp. Med. 204:1891-1900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burdelya, L. G., et al. 2008. An agonist of Toll-like receptor 5 has radioprotective activity in mouse and primate models. Science 320:226-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, X., et al. 2008. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 135:1984-1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eaves-Pyles, T., et al. 2001. Flagellin, a novel mediator of Salmonella-induced epithelial activation and systemic inflammation: I kappa B alpha degradation, induction of nitric oxide synthase, induction of proinflammatory mediators, and cardiovascular dysfunction. J. Immunol. 166:1248-1260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flegel, W. A., et al. 1991. Cytokine response by human monocytes to Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B. Infect. Immun. 59:3659-3666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gaboriau-Routhiau, V., et al. 2009. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity 31:677-689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gewirtz, A. T., T. A. Navas, S. Lyons, P. J. Godowski, and J. L. Madara. 2001. Bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression. J. Immunol. 167:1882-1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hill, D. A., and D. Artis. 2010. Intestinal bacteria and the regulation of immune cell homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28:623-667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ivanov, I. I., et al. 2009. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139:485-498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kelly, C. P., et al. 1994. Neutrophil recruitment in Clostridium difficile toxin A enteritis in the rabbit. J. Clin. Invest. 93:1257-1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kelly, C. P., and J. T. LaMont. 2008. Clostridium difficile—more difficult than ever. N. Engl. J. Med. 359:1932-1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kinnebrew, M. A., et al. 2010. Bacterial flagellin stimulates Toll-like receptor 5-dependent defense against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 201:534-543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuehne, S. A., et al. 2010. The role of toxin A and toxin B in Clostridium difficile infection. Nature 467:711-713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kyne, L., M. B. Hamel, R. Polavaram, and C. P. Kelly. 2002. Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile. Clin. Infect. Dis. 34:346-353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lawley, T. D., et al. 2009. Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infect. Immun. 77:3661-3669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lebeis, S. L., B. Bommarius, C. A. Parkos, M. A. Sherman, and D. Kalman. 2007. TLR signaling mediated by MyD88 is required for a protective innate immune response by neutrophils to Citrobacter rodentium. J. Immunol. 179:566-577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maaser, C., et al. 2004. Human intestinal microvascular endothelial cells express Toll-like receptor 5: a binding partner for bacterial flagellin. J. Immunol. 172:5056-5062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mahida, Y. R., et al. 1998. Effect of Clostridium difficile toxin A on human colonic lamina propria cells: early loss of macrophages followed by T-cell apoptosis. Infect. Immun. 66:5462-5469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Munoz, N., et al. 2010. Mucosal administration of flagellin protects mice from Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection. Infect. Immun. 78:4226-4233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ng, J., et al. 2010. Clostridium difficile toxin-induced inflammation and intestinal injury are mediated by the inflammasome. Gastroenterology 139:542-552, 552 e541-543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nusrat, A., et al. 2001. Clostridium difficile toxins disrupt epithelial barrier function by altering membrane microdomain localization of tight junction proteins. Infect. Immun. 69:1329-1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Papatheodorou, P., C. Zamboglou, S. Genisyuerek, G. Guttenberg, and K. Aktories. 2010. Clostridial glucosylating toxins enter cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS One 5:e10673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pickert, G., et al. 2009. STAT3 links IL-22 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells to mucosal wound healing. J. Exp. Med. 206:1465-1472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rakoff-Nahoum, S., J. Paglino, F. Eslami-Varzaneh, S. Edberg, and R. Medzhitov. 2004. Recognition of commensal microflora by Toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118:229-241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rupnik, M., M. H. Wilcox, and D. N. Gerding. 2009. Clostridium difficile infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:526-536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sorg, J. A., and S. S. Dineen. 2009. Laboratory maintenance of Clostridium difficile. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 9:unit 9A1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sun, X., X. He, S. Tzipori, R. Gerhard, and H. Feng. 2009. Essential role of the glucosyltransferase activity in Clostridium difficile toxin-induced secretion of TNF-alpha by macrophages. Microb. Pathog. 46:298-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tasteyre, A., et al. 2000. A Clostridium difficile gene encoding flagellin. Microbiology 146:957-966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uematsu, S., et al. 2006. Detection of pathogenic intestinal bacteria by Toll-like receptor 5 on intestinal CD11c+ lamina propria cells. Nat. Immunol. 7:868-874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Van Maele, L., et al. 2010. TLR5 signaling stimulates the innate production of IL-17 and IL-22 by CD3(neg)CD127+ immune cells in spleen and mucosa. J. Immunol. 185:1177-1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vijay-Kumar, M., et al. 2008. Flagellin treatment protects against chemicals, bacteria, viruses, and radiation. J. Immunol. 180:8280-8285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Warny, M., et al. 2000. p38 MAP kinase activation by Clostridium difficile toxin A mediates monocyte necrosis, IL-8 production, and enteritis. J. Clin. Invest. 105:1147-1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yan, Y., et al. 2009. Temporal and spatial analysis of clinical and molecular parameters in dextran sodium sulfate induced colitis. PLoS One 4:e6073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu, F. S., et al. 2010. Flagellin stimulates protective lung mucosal immunity: role of cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide. J. Immunol. 185:1142-1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zheng, Y., et al. 2008. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat. Med. 14:282-289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES