Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2011 Jan 31;79(4):1770–1778. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00605-10

Antibodies Contribute to Effective Vaccination against Respiratory Infection by Type A Francisella tularensis Strains

Gopi Mara-Koosham 1, Julie A Hutt 1,2, C Rick Lyons 1, Terry H Wu 1,*
PMCID: PMC3067570  PMID: 21282410

Abstract

Pneumonic tularemia is a life-threatening disease caused by inhalation of the highly infectious intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis. The most serious form of the disease associated with the type A strains can be prevented in experimental animals through vaccination with the attenuated live vaccine strain (LVS). The protection is largely cell mediated, but the contribution of antibodies remains controversial. We addressed this issue in a series of passive immunization studies in Fischer 344 (F344) rats. Subcutaneous LVS vaccination induced a robust serum antibody response dominated by IgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b antibodies. Prophylactic administration of LVS immune serum or purified immune IgG reduced the severity and duration of disease in naïve rats challenged intratracheally with a lethal dose of the virulent type A strain SCHU S4. The level of resistance increased with the volume of immune serum given, but the maximum survivable SCHU S4 challenge dose was at least 100-fold lower than that shown for LVS-vaccinated rats. Protection correlated with reduced systemic bacterial growth, less severe histopathology in the liver and spleen during the early phase of infection, and bacterial clearance by a T cell-dependent mechanism. Our results suggest that treatment with immune serum limited the sequelae associated with infection, thereby enabling a sterilizing T cell response to develop and resolve the infection. Thus, antibodies induced by LVS vaccination may contribute to the defense of F344 rats against respiratory infection by type A strains of F. tularensis.


Pneumonic tularemia is a highly debilitating disease caused by the Gram-negative coccobacillus Francisella tularensis. Strains classified under subspecies tularensis (type A) are the most virulent and pose the biggest challenge from a clinical perspective (28), with a mortality rate estimated to exceed 30% in untreated patients (11). Prophylactic vaccination is the best countermeasure, and there is good historical evidence that pneumonic tularemia can be prevented by vaccination with the attenuated F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) (37). However, LVS is unlikely to be licensed for mass vaccination because the mechanism of attenuation has not been defined. Due to the potential of a major public health threat, there is an urgent need to understand the protective mechanisms associated with an effective immune response so that novel vaccines can be developed.

Protective immunity against F. tularensis infection is usually attributed to an effective T cell response. However, F. tularensis has a significant extracellular phase, which makes it accessible to humoral immune responses (18). Indeed, there is ample evidence that B cells and antibodies are necessary for mice to develop their natural resistance to primary and secondary LVS infections. Purified lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from LVS induced a population of B1-a cells within 2 to 3 days of administration that protected mice against intraperitoneal (i.p.) LVS challenge (6, 7, 14). Consistent with these results, μMT mice lacking mature B cells exhibited increased susceptibility to primary intradermal (i.d.) LVS infection and delayed bacterial clearance (15, 40). μMT mice were also more susceptible to secondary i.p. LVS infection, and this defect was corrected by reconstitution with LVS-primed B cells (15). The contribution of antibodies has been addressed repeatedly in passive immunization experiments, which showed that immune serum from humans and mice vaccinated with live or inactivated LVS protected naïve mice against challenges with LVS or other low virulence strains given by a variety of routes (13, 19, 26, 29, 33, 36, 40). The dominant antibody response was directed at LPS, but antibodies against protein antigens have also been found (17, 23, 31, 41, 43). Monoclonal antibodies specific for LPS or the outer membrane protein FopA provided significant protection against LVS challenge when given either prophylactically (38) or therapeutically (30, 38). Together, these results suggest that antibodies contribute toward effective control of attenuated or low-virulence F. tularensis strains.

It has been much more difficult to demonstrate antibody-mediated protection against type A strains in mice (1, 20, 21, 38), even though they express many antigens recognized by LVS immune serum (13, 30). This is not surprising given the historical difficulties in generating protective immunity against type A strains in this animal model (5). However, Ray et al. recently showed that oral LVS vaccination protected mice against a pulmonary SCHU S4 challenge in an antibody-dependent manner (35). Klimpel et al. also reported a similar finding using immune serum from mice cured of a lethal intranasal (i.n.) SCHU S4 infection with levofloxacin in a passive immunization model (27). Thus, the protective effects of antibodies appear not to be restricted only to low-virulence strains but may also contribute to the protection against highly virulent type A strains.

To further characterize the mechanism of antibody-mediated protection, we utilized the recently characterized Fischer 344 (F344) rat model (45). Since F344 rats developed much stronger resistance to respiratory SCHU S4 challenge after LVS vaccination than previously observed in mice, we speculated that antibodies may provide better protection in this model and allow us to define their protective mechanism more thoroughly. We now show in a passive immunization model that serum antibodies from LVS-vaccinated rats conferred protection against a lethal intratracheal (i.t.) SCHU S4 challenge. Protection correlated with reduced systemic bacterial growth and less severe histopathology during the early phase of infection and bacterial clearance by a T cell-dependent mechanism. Thus, antibodies contribute to but are not sufficient for the effective control of respiratory infections by fully virulent type A strains. Our studies provide valuable insights into the protective mechanisms of antibodies that will guide future development of tularemia vaccine candidates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats.

Female F344 rats and athymic rnu/rnu rats were purchased from the National Cancer Institute—Frederick (Frederick, MD). The animals were housed in a specific-pathogen-free facility at the University of New Mexico Animal Resource Facility. All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Biosafety Committee at the University of New Mexico.

Bacteria.

F. tularensis strains LVS and SCHU S4 were obtained from DynPort Vaccine Company LLC (Frederick, MD). The original stock was expanded in Chamberlain's broth (Teknova, Hollister, CA) at 37°C for 48 h with gentle shaking, and aliquots of the culture were stored at −80°C without any preservative.

LVS vaccination and serum collection.

Rats were lightly anesthetized with isoflurane (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) and vaccinated subcutaneously (s.c.) between the shoulder blades with 5 × 107 CFU LVS in 100 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Four weeks after vaccination, rats were euthanized by CO2 overexposure and immune serum was collected and pooled. Normal serum was collected in a similar manner or purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Both normal and immune sera were heated to 55°C for 30 min to inactivate complement, filter sterilized through a 0.22-μm syringe tip filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA), and stored at −80°C.

Purification of serum IgG and IgM.

Serum IgG and IgM were purified using a Melon gel purification kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Research, Rockford, IL) and Capture Select IgM affinity matrix (BAC B.V., Naarden, Netherlands), respectively, following the manufacturer's instructions with a few modifications. Briefly, normal and immune sera were diluted 10-fold in PBS and then precipitated slowly with 50% ammonium sulfate overnight at 4°C. The precipitate was separated from the supernatant by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 20 min and was resuspended in Melon gel purification buffer for IgG purification or in PBS for IgM purification. The suspensions were subsequently dialyzed 3 times against 300 volumes of Melon gel purification buffer for IgG or PBS for IgM using a Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassette with a 10-kDa molecular weight cutoff (Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Research, Rockford, IL). IgG was purified from the dialyzed samples following the manufacturer's microcentrifuge spin column protocol using a Melon gel volume that was 1.25 times the undiluted serum volume. IgM was purified using IgM affinity matrix resin that was 0.5 times the undiluted serum volume. Before analyzing the purity and subsequent treatment of rats, purified IgG and IgM were dialyzed against PBS as described above. The concentration of total IgG and IgM was interpolated from a standard curve generated with commercially available IgG and IgM of known concentrations (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and the titers of anti-LVS IgG and IgM as well as contaminating antibody isotypes were determined using an LVS-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described below. The purity was analyzed by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

ELISA for anti-LVS antibody titer.

Maxisorp 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) were coated with 2.5 × 106 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml of heat-killed LVS in PBS overnight at 4°C. After blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk-PBS for 1 h at 37°C, 100 μl of rat serum was added in 2-fold serial dilutions and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Antibody classes and subclasses were detected by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antibodies against rat IgG (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) and IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG2c, IgM, and IgA (Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Research Products, Rockford, IL) for 45 min at 37°C. Between each step, the plates were washed 5 times with 0.05% Tween 20-PBS. The plates were developed with a solution of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), the reaction was stopped with 1.8 N H2SO4, and the optical density (OD) was read at 450 nm. The antibody titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of immune serum that had a mean OD value that was at least 3 standard deviations higher than the mean OD of normal serum at the same dilution.

Passive immunization and challenge.

Rats were passively immunized by i.p. injection of 250 μl of serum, unless otherwise indicated in selected experiments. Purified IgG and IgM was used in some experiments; the volume given contained the equivalent amount of LVS-specific IgG as in 250 μl of LVS-immune serum. At 24 h after passive immunization, rats were infected i.t. as described previously (45). Briefly, rats were immobilized on an inclined platform (Alpha Lab Supply, Albuquerque, NM) and intubated with a 20-gauge intravenous catheter (Terumo Medical Products, Somerset, NJ) with the help of a small animal laryngoscope with a fiber optic light source (Penn-Century, Inc., Philadelphia, PA). In some experiments 50 μl of inoculum premixed with self-illuminating quantum dots (Zymera, San Jose, CA) was delivered using a blunt-ended needle, followed by 50 μl of Coelenterazine and a burst of >500 μl of air to ensure the delivery of the inoculum. The infected rats were imaged in vivo using the IVIS 100 optical imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA). The health of the infected animals was monitored daily along with weight loss and survival. The clinical scores of infection were assigned as follows: 0, active, bright and alert, responsive to handling; 1, slight lethargy and weight loss; 2, decreased responsiveness to handling, clear piloerection, more pronounced weight loss; 3, definite decreased activity, ruffled coat, rapid and shallow breathing, hunched posture, eyes half closed and may have porphyrin secretion; 4, inactive and unresponsive to handling, weak and/or ataxic, severe weight loss, eyes completely closed with a large amount of porphyrin secretion. Animals that succumbed to infection were given a maximum score of 4.

Bacterial burden analysis.

To quantify the deposited bacteria, lungs were aseptically removed 1 h after infection and homogenized in PBS using a hand-held or multisample homogenizer fitted with disposable plastic homogenizing probes (Omni International, Marietta, GA). Lung homogenates were plated neat or at appropriate dilutions onto selective cysteine heart agar plates with 5% rabbit blood, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 U/ml polymyxin B (Remel, Lexena, KS), and bacterial colonies were quantified 4 to 5 days later using Qcount (Spiral Biotech, Bethesda, MD). A similar procedure was followed to determine the bacterial burden in lungs, spleen, and liver over the course of infection. When no organism was found, a value equal to the limit of detection was used to calculate the mean bacterial burden.

Histopathological evaluation.

Following i.t. challenge, rats were euthanized by i.p. injection of 150 μl of Sleepaway (>100 mg/kg of body weight; Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA) on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 postchallenge. Lungs were removed from the thorax en bloc and inflated with 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) via a tracheal cannula. Lungs, spleen, liver, and tracheo-bronchial lymph nodes were fixed in 10% NBF for 24 to 72 h and subsequently trimmed for paraffin embedding. Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis by a board-certified veterinary pathologist. Lesions were graded in a blinded manner on a semiquantitative scale based upon the severity and distribution of lesions (1, minimal; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, marked).

In vivo T cell depletion and flow cytometry.

The hybridoma clones OX-8 (mouse anti-rat CD8; IgG1), OX-38 (mouse anti-rat CD4; IgG2a), and 55-6 (mouse anti-HIV-1 gp120; IgG2a) were obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (Salisbury, United Kingdom), and TS2/18.1.1 (mouse anti-human CD2; IgG1) was from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Ascites fluids were generated in female ICR SCID mice, and the IgG concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (Taconic, Albany, NY). For CD4 T cell depletion, rats were injected i.p. with 5 mg/kg of CD4 T cell-depleting antibody OX-38 or isotype control antibody 55-6 for five consecutive days and then with 1 mg/rat twice a week. For CD8 T cell depletion, 1 mg/rat of CD8 T cell-depleting antibody OX-8 or isotype control antibody TS2/18.1.1 antibodies were administered once a week. One week after the start of antibody treatment, the depletion efficiency was confirmed by flow cytometric analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected by lateral tail vein bleed. In addition, the effects of CD4 T cell depletion on the populations of NK cells, B cells, and CD8 T cells in the spleen, liver, and blood were examined. Rats were euthanized by CO2 overexposure and exsanguinated by cutting the inferior vena cava. Blood collected from the chest cavity was mixed with an equal volume of PBS supplemented with 50 U/ml of heparin and layered over Lympholyte-M density separation medium (Cedarlane, Burlingtion, NC) following the manufacturer's instructions. The lymphocytes were collected at the interface of the density gradient medium. To isolate splenocytes, spleens were homogenized between ground glass slides and passed through 70-μm nylon screen (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). To isolate liver cells, the right lobes were homogenized through a 200-gauge stainless steel mesh, resuspended in 40% Percoll, and layered over a 70% Percoll solution. The samples were centrifuged at 836 × g for 20 min at 4°C without break. Cells were harvested from the Percoll interface. All the cell preparations were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA), washed with PBS, and resuspended in complete RPMI (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate) before staining. Cells were stained with biotinylated anti-CD8b (mouse IgG1, κ, clone 341) and anti-CD161a (mouse IgG1, κ, clone 10/78), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD45R (mouse IgG2b, κ, clone HIS24), and allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-CD3 (mouse IgM, κ, clone iF4) antibodies from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA) and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD8b (mouse IgG1, κ, clone eBio341) and FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (mouse IgG2a, clone OX-35) antibodies from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). Biotinylated cells were detected using peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP)-conjugated streptavidin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Before staining the cells, nonspecific antibody binding was blocked by incubating with anti-rat CD32 (mouse IgG1, κ, clone D34-485) according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Appropriate isotype controls were used. The stained cells were fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACSCalibur (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). The flow cytometry data were analyzed using Winlist (Verity, Topsham, ME).

Statistics.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed by the log-rank test, and SCHU S4 burden following multiple serum treatments was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Total cell populations from the tissues of isotype control-treated and CD4-depleting antibody-treated animals were compared using a two-tailed unpaired t test. These analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.01 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). SCHU S4 growth kinetics in experiments with single prophylactic serum treatment were analyzed by fitting two-way ANOVA with interaction using the general linear model in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Development of serum antibody response after s.c. LVS vaccination.

We showed previously that Fischer 344 rats cleared a vaccine inoculum of 5 × 107 LVS within 2 weeks of subcutaneous vaccination and were protected when challenged 2 weeks later with SCHU S4 i.t. (45). To determine the antibody response over this 4-week period, the serum concentrations of LVS-specific IgM, IgG, and IgA were measured. Subcutaneous LVS vaccination induced robust serum IgM and IgG responses in F344 rats (Fig. 1). The average IgM and IgG titers after 7 days were 1:64,000 and 1:16,000, respectively. The IgM titer peaked 1 week later at 1:32,000 and declined thereafter. The IgG titers remained relatively stable at 1:16,000 to 1:32,000 over the 4-week period. Serum IgA was detected in all vaccinated rats, but the titer never exceeded 1:800 (data not shown).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Subcutaneous LVS vaccination induces a robust IgM and IgG serum antibody response. F344 rats (n = 3) were vaccinated s.c. with 5 × 107 CFU of LVS. Sera were collected on days 7, 15, 21, and 28 postinoculation, and the total LVS-specific IgM, IgG, and IgA antibody titers were determined for each rat by ELISA using heat-killed LVS as the capture antigen. The antibody titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of immune serum that had a mean OD value that was greater than 3 standard deviations above the mean OD of normal serum at the same dilution. The data show the geometric mean ± standard deviation.

Passive immunization with immune serum protects F344 rats against pneumonic tularemia.

To determine whether LVS-specific serum antibodies can protect F344 rats against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge, naïve F344 rats were treated prophylactically with immune rat serum (IRS) and then challenged i.t. with SCHU S4. Immune sera were pooled from several F344 rats 28 days after LVS vaccination, when no trace of LVS could be detected systemically. The predominant antibodies were IgM, IgG2a, and IgG2b, and the titers of IgG1, IgG2c, and IgA were at least 10-fold lower (Fig. 2). Naïve F344 rats were treated i.p. with an arbitrary volume of 250 μl IRS, a volume which constituted ∼7% of the total serum volume in a recipient F344 rat weighing ∼150 g. At 24 h after serum transfer, the passively immunized rats were challenged i.t. with a small but lethal dose of ∼250 CFU, which was selected intentionally to reduce the threshold required to detect any protective effect brought about by the LVS-specific immune serum. Rats treated with normal rat serum (NRS) and LVS-vaccinated rats were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. All rats were monitored for survival, weight loss, and clinical signs for 5 weeks. The first indication of illness in the NRS-treated rats was a slight weight loss and decreased alertness 3 to 4 days postinfection (p.i.). The disease progressed very quickly over the next 48 to 72 h and was characterized by rapid loss of up to 30% of body weight (Fig. 3 A) and development of severe lethargy, ruffled coat, eyelid ptosis, and hunched posture (Fig. 3B). At the peak of disease severity, the rats were extremely weak and unresponsive, and their eyes were completely closed and surrounded by a large amount of ocular discharge. Most infected rats died within 2 weeks of infection (Fig. 3C). Although the IRS-treated rats exhibited some of the early signs of infection, weight loss occurred more gradually and rarely exceeded 10% of the initial body weight. All signs of illness resolved within 2 weeks of infection, and the rats remained outwardly healthy for the remaining 2 to 3 weeks of monitoring. LVS-vaccinated rats never lost weight or exhibited any overt signs of disease. In five independent experiments, at a SCHU S4 challenge dose of 218 to 240 CFU, 27 of 29 rats treated with IRS survived, while 29 of 30 NRS-treated rats died (Table 1). These results suggested that serum antibodies are capable of mediating protection against a lethal respiratory SCHU S4 infection.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Antibody composition in the immune serum used for passive immunization. F344 rats (n = 3 to 4) were vaccinated s.c. with 5 × 107 CFU of LVS. Sera were collected 28 days postvaccination and analyzed by ELISA for the presence of LVS-specific antibodies of the indicated isotypes and subclasses by using heat-killed LVS as the capture antigen. Antibody titers were defined as described for Fig. 1. The data represent the geometric means ± standard deviations of samples combined from two independent experiments.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Passive immunization with IRS protects naïve rats against a lethal i.t. SCHU S4 challenge. Groups (n = 6) of LVS-vaccinated rats and naïve F344 rats were treated i.p. with 250 μl of heat-inactivated NRS or IRS and then challenged i.t. 24 h later with 240 CFU of SCHU S4. The challenge dose represents the actual lung deposition, determined within 1 h of infection. The infected rats were monitored daily for weight (A), clinical signs (B), and survival (C). In panel A, the results are presented as a percentage relative to the body weight, measured 24 h before challenge. A value of 100% indicates no weight change, and points above and below 100% represent weight gain and loss, respectively. In panel B, the disease severity was scored based on the criteria described in Materials and Methods. Data represent the averages of all survivors in each group ± the standard deviations.

TABLE 1.

Summary of survival results of F344 rats challenged intratracheally with SCHU S4 after prophylactic treatment with 250 μl of serum

SCHU S4 challenge dose (CFU)a Immune rat serum
Normal rat serum
Survival ratio (no. alive/total) MTDc (days) Survival ratio (no. alive/total) MTD (days)
130 6/6 1/5 7
218-240b 27/29 11 1/30 9
360 5/6 12 0/5 8
727 5/6 14 0/6 7
1,496 1/6 11
3,525 0/6 13 0/6 8
10,083 0/6 10 0/6 4
a

Based on bacteria recovered from the lungs 1 h after infection.

b

Data are from five separate experiments using a challenge dose within this range.

c

MTD, mean time to death.

Purified IgG is sufficient for protection against SCHU S4 infection.

To verify that LVS-specific antibodies were responsible for the serum-mediated protection, IgG and IgM were purified from normal and immune sera. The purification process reduced the titers of contaminating antibody isotypes to <1:100 and removed most contaminating proteins, except for a prominent 75-kDa protein in the purified IgG fraction that has not been identified (Fig. 4 A and B). For passive immunization, F344 rats were injected with an amount of purified IgG and/or IgM that was equivalent to that contained in 250 μl of serum. Similar to IRS, purified immune IgG provided significant protection against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge (Fig. 4C). In contrast, purified immune IgM offered no protection and the treated rats succumbed to SCHU S4 infection at the same time as rats treated with normal serum. These results indicated that LVS-specific IgG is the principal protective component in the immune serum. Since IRS and purified immune IgG provided similar levels of protection, IRS was used in all experiments described here.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Passive transfer of purified LVS-immune IgG, but not IgM, protects naïve rats against a lethal i.t. SCHU S4 challenge. IgG and IgM were purified from pooled NRS and IRS collected 28 days after s.c. LVS vaccination. The purities of enriched IgG (A) and IgM (B) preparations were analyzed with SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie blue dye. IRG, immune IgG; NRG, normal IgG; IRM, immune IgM; NRM, normal IgM. The titers of LVS-specific IgM, IgG, and IgA were determined by ELISA as described for Fig. 1, and the titer of contaminating antibody isotypes in the enriched preparations was <1:100. (C) Groups of five F344 rats were treated with an amount of purified IgG or IgM that was equivalent to 250 μl of serum and challenged i.t. 1 day later with 810 CFU of SCHU S4. Survival was monitored daily.

Immune serum treatment of F344 rats limits SCHU S4 growth.

Since IRS treatment provided significant protection against pulmonary SCHU S4 infection, we next investigated the effect of this treatment on SCHU S4 growth. IRS-treated rats exhibited a pattern of SCHU S4 growth and dissemination that was intermediate between the NRS-treated rats and the LVS-vaccinated rats. Bacterial expansion in the first 2 days following infection was identical between the IRS- and NRS-treated rats: in both groups, the number of lung bacteria increased to 107 CFU and systemic dissemination to the liver and spleen had occurred in the majority of animals (Fig. 5). The two groups started to diverge on day 3, when fewer bacteria were recovered from the IRS-treated rats. The bacterial burden in NRS-treated rats peaked on day 7 p.i., shortly before they died, with 8 × 108 CFU in the lungs, 4 × 108 CFU in the liver, and 2 × 107 CFU in the spleen. In contrast, the bacterial burden in the IRS-treated rats increased at a slower rate, to a peak on day 10 p.i. By day 14, the infection began to clear in the IRS-treated rats, and the bacterial load in all three tissues had dropped from their peak. These results suggest that IRS may contribute to protection of naïve F344 rats by limiting bacterial growth and facilitating development of an immune response that eventually clears the infection.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

IRS-treated rats exhibit a pattern of SCHU S4 growth intermediate between NRS-treated rats and LVS-vaccinated rats. LVS-vaccinated F344 rats and naïve rats treated with 250 μl of heat-inactivated NRS or heat-inactivated IRS were challenged i.t. 1 day after serum treatment with 260 CFU of SCHU S4. Three to four rats were euthanized from each group on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 postchallenge to determine the total SCHU S4 burden in the lungs, spleen, and liver. The numbers of lung bacteria on day 0 reflect the actual lung deposition determined within 1 h of infection, and the dashed lines represent the limit of detection for each organ. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation.

Protection by IRS is dependent on the SCHU S4 challenge dose and the volume of IRS.

To further characterize the potency of IRS, titrations of the SCHU S4 challenge dose and the IRS volume were performed. A single treatment with 250 μl of IRS provided long-term protection to over 90% of naïve rats challenged with up to ∼700 CFU SCHU S4 (Table 1). The mortality rate increased when the challenge dose was increased to over 1.5 × 103 CFU, and all of the infected rats died between 10 and 13 days after challenge. There was little correlation between the challenge dose and the time to death. The cumulative results from seven independent experiments suggested that the i.t. 50% lethal dose (LD50) of SCHU S4 in F344 rats treated with 250 μl of IRS was in the range of 700 to 1,500 CFU; this was at least 100-fold less than the LD50 associated with s.c. LVS vaccination (45).

Reducing the IRS volume had a dose-dependent effect on the level of protection against a fixed challenge dose. When the IRS volume was reduced to 25 μl, the treatment prolonged the survival of rats challenged i.t. with 360 CFU by 4 to 5 days, but they eventually succumbed to infection (Fig. 6). All protective effects were eliminated when the IRS volume was further reduced to 2.5 or 0.25 μl. Increasing the IRS volume to 1 ml did not substantially delay disease onset, improve clinical signs, or accelerate resolution compared to the 250-μl treatment (data not shown). Since the effectiveness of a single IRS treatment may be limited by the availability of target organisms at or around the time of administration, rats were given repeated IRS injections in an attempt to match the increasing bacteria numbers due to proliferation over the course of infection. F344 rats were either treated with 250 μl of IRS once before SCHU S4 challenge or multiple times on days −1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 relative to challenge. The total bacterial burden in the lungs, spleen, and liver of rats was determined on days 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 after challenge. As shown in Fig. 7, multiple antibody treatments did not alter the general pattern of SCHU S4 growth and dissemination compared to a single treatment (P > 0.05 for all three organs).

FIG. 6.

FIG. 6.

IRS-mediated protection is dose dependent. Groups of F344 rats (n = 6) were treated i.p. with the indicated volumes of heat-inactivated IRS and 1 day later challenged i.t. with 360 CFU of SCHU S4. Four additional groups of rats were treated with equivalent volumes of NRS; all but one rat treated with 250 μl died by day 10 of infection.

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Multiple IRS treatments have the same effect on SCHU S4 growth kinetics as a single treatment. Naïve F344 rats were either treated with a single dose of 250 μl of heat-inactivated IRS 1 day before challenge (day −1) or with multiple 250-μl doses on days −1 and +3, 6, 9, and 12. One day after the first treatment, rats were challenged i.t. with 420 CFU of SCHU S4. On the indicated days, the bacterial burdens in the lungs, spleen, and liver were determined from three rats per group. The dashed lines indicate the detection limit for each tissue, and each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation. There was no significant difference in the bacterial burden between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Taken together, these results showed that a single IRS treatment was sufficient to protect F344 rats against i.t. challenge of up to ∼700 SCHU S4 organisms. This protection required a minimum IRS volume of 250 μl, and any amount beyond this volume threshold given in a single or multiple treatments provided little additional benefit.

Histopathology of serum-treated rats after i.t. challenge with SCHU S4.

In order to determine how the IRS-treated rats survived a lethal pulmonary SCHU S4 challenge despite an extremely high bacterial burden, we next evaluated whether IRS treatment limited the histopathology in the infected tissues. Lung lesions in both IRS- and NRS-treated rats were first detected on day 3 p.i. and consisted of neutrophilic and histiocytic inflammation within alveoli, bronchioles, and bronchi and in the perivascular spaces of adjacent blood vessels. Over the next 4 days, the lung inflammation became progressively more necrotizing in both exposure groups. Lung lesion severity was similar in the IRS- and NRS-treated rats during the first 7 days p.i., after which time the NRS-treated rats did not survive. For comparison, the lung lesions in LVS-vaccinated rats were similar in nature and severity to the IRS- and NRS-treated rats during the first 5 days p.i. but gradually decreased in severity starting at day 7 p.i.

Lesions in the liver and spleen were first detected in the IRS- and NRS- treated rats on day 3 p.i. Splenic and hepatic lesions consisted of multifocal, random neutrophilic and histiocytic inflammation on day 3 p.i. and frequently progressed to necrotizing inflammation by day 5 p.i. In both the IRS- and NRS-treated rats, maximal hepatic and splenic lesion severity scores were achieved on day 5 p.i. However, the maximal severity scores for splenic and hepatic lesions in the IRS-treated rats were lower than for the NRS- treated rats. Furthermore, the lesion severity decreased for the IRS-treated rats by day 7 p.i., but not for the NRS-treated rats. For comparison, in the vaccinated rats, lesions were sparse to nonexistent at all time points examined (Fig. 8 A to F). These results demonstrate that IRS treatment reduced inflammation in the tissues to which F. tularensis is known to disseminate.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

IRS-treated rats develop less severe splenic inflammation than NRS-treated control rats at day 7 p.i. with SCHU S4. The spleens of LVS-vaccinated (LVS vac), or IRS- and NRS-treated rats were examined histologically at day 7 after SCHU S4 challenge. The spleens of vaccinated rats were without detectable lesions (A and B). The spleens of the NRS-treated rats exhibited nearly complete effacement of the red pulp with neutrophilic and histiocytic inflammation (C and D), while the spleens of the IRS-treated rats exhibited only multifocal neutrophilic and histiocytic inflammation in the red pulp (E and F). Arrows point to paler-appearing areas of inflammation in the splenic red pulp.

T cells are critical for antibody-mediated protection.

The importance of T cells in antibody-mediated protection was determined in T cell-deficient athymic nude rats. Nude rats are derived from a heterogeneous genetic background and have normal B cell function but an increased NK cell population. Nude rats were naturally more resistant to SCHU S4 infection and lived 2 to 3 days longer than similarly infected F344 rats. Prophylactic treatment with 250 μl IRS significantly prolonged the survival of infected nude rats by an additional 3 days (P < 0.01), but all infected animals died by day 16 p.i. (Fig. 9 A). These results suggested that a T cell-independent mechanism can temporarily modify the disease process, but T cells are critical for the long-term protection associated with immune serum.

FIG. 9.

FIG. 9.

IRS-mediated protection is dependent on T cells. (A) T cell-deficient athymic (RNu) nude rats and immunocompetent Fischer 344 rats (n = 6 per group) were treated with 250 μl of heat-inactivated IRS or NRS and 1 day later challenged i.t. with 465 CFU SCHU S4. (B) Naïve F344 rats (n = 5) were depleted of CD4, CD8, or both CD4 and CD8 T cells by i.p. injection of depleting antibodies OX-38 (CD4) and OX-8 (CD8). T cell depletion was maintained over the course of infection with additional treatments with depleting antibodies. The T cell-depleted rats were treated with 250 μl of heat-inactivated IRS or NRS and 1 day later challenged i.t. with 810 CFU of SCHU S4. The rats were monitored daily for survival and clinical signs of illness.

To determine the requirement for CD4 and CD8 T cells in passively immunized F344 rats, we developed a very effective in vivo depletion regimen using the anti-CD8 antibody OX-8 and the anti-CD4 antibody OX-38. These antibody treatment regimens reduced and maintained the peripheral blood CD4 and CD8 T cell populations to <5 and <1% of normal levels, respectively, over the course of infection. As shown in Fig. 9B, depletion of CD8 T cells completely abolished the ability of IRS to protect against SCHU S4 challenge. Depletion of CD4 T cells had only a partial effect. This may be related to a slight (<2-fold), but not statistically significant, increase in the total number of CD8 T cells in the spleen, liver, and blood; no difference in B cells (CD45R+) or NK cells (CD161+) were observed (data not shown). Indeed, the mortality rate of rats depleted of both CD4 and CD8 T cells was similar to the animals depleted of CD8 T cells alone. Thus, these results suggest that CD8 T cells are essential for IRS to protect rats against pulmonary infection with SCHU S4.

DISCUSSION

It is widely accepted that tularemia vaccines such as LVS must induce a potent cell-mediated immunity to be effective against highly virulent type A strains of F. tularensis. LVS vaccination also induces a strong antibody response, but its role in protection has not been thoroughly addressed. We now show that the serum antibodies provided significant protection against a lethal, respiratory SCHU S4 challenge in the F344 rat passive immunization model. These results suggest that antibodies may be an important component in the overall defense against pneumonic tularemia.

We previously showed that the F344 rat is a good animal model for studying human pneumonic tularemia (45). In the present study, F344 rats were vaccinated s.c. to reproduce human vaccination by the scarification method currently used under the Special Immunization Program at USAMRIID. Similar to humans vaccinated by scarification (16, 44), the s.c. vaccinated rats developed strong IgM and IgG responses within a week of vaccination. Further studies showed that only purified serum IgG but not IgM mediated protection against i.t. SCHU S4 challenge in the rat. We have not ruled out the potential contribution of IgA to protection, especially in the lungs or other mucosal surfaces. In fact, the majority of humans (16, 44) and mice (26) developed positive serum IgA titers following scarification or i.n. vaccination, respectively. The protective capabilities of IgA have been demonstrated repeatedly in vaccine studies with IgA-deficient mice, which did not develop complete resistance against respiratory infections with LVS (2, 34) and SCHU S4 (35). A significant amount of IgA was also found in the immune mouse serum that passively transferred immunity against i.n. LVS infection (26). Thus, in addition to IgG, IgA may also play a role in protection against respiratory tularemia caused by type A strains.

It has been suggested that the morbidity and mortality associated with pneumonic tularemia are caused by the damage inflicted on the extrapulmonary tissues (8). An extension of this idea is that control of bacterial dissemination and growth outside the lungs would offer considerable survival advantage. Our results are consistent with this idea and suggest that passive immunization modified the course of acute infection by enhancing the innate immune response to disseminated bacteria. The presence of LVS-specific antibodies appeared to be most critical during the early phase of infection, because IRS failed to rescue infected rats when the treatment was delayed by 48 h (data not shown) and increasing the amount of serum or the treatment frequency did not improve the level of protection. IRS treatment had little, if any, quantitative or qualitative impact on the bacterial burden and the histopathology in the lungs. Rather, the effects of IRS on bacterial growth were most clearly observed in the infected liver and spleen. The liver is a major site of F. tularensis colonization and replication (9), and pneumonic tularemia is associated with hepatocellular damage in multiple experimental animal models, including the F344 rat (8, 32, 42, 45). Although the level of damage falls short of liver failure and may be reversible, such damage may nevertheless compromise the liver's ability to perform essential metabolic functions and to utilize its many innate immune mechanisms to control systemic bacterial growth (22, 25). In contrast, IRS treatment reduced the bacterial burden and histopathology in the liver and, in doing so, may have preserved more liver functions in the infected rat. Similar passive immunization studies of mice with LVS point to a process that involves Fc receptor and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (26, 36), and the liver is one of the richest sources of NK cells that are capable of producing an IFN-γ in response to F. tularensis infection (4, 12). This may also explain the ability of immune serum to delay the death of athymic nude rats and mice (36), which express higher NK cell activity than wild-type animals (10, 24). By controlling the rapid growth rate and dissemination of SCHU S4 and limiting the pathological damage associated with infection, IRS may have enabled the host to survive long enough to develop an effective T cell response that eliminated the infection. Indeed, LVS-vaccinated rats with both F. tularensis-specific antibodies and immune T cells had the lowest bacterial burden and showed the fewest histological changes following SCHU S4 infection.

T cells are required for the long-term protective effects of passive immunization. In the absence of T cells, IRS only delayed the death of athymic nude rats by several days. CD8 T cells appeared to play a more critical role than CD4 T cells, since depletion of CD8 T cells rendered rats completely susceptible to SCHU S4 infection, while only a fraction of the rats depleted of CD4 T cells succumbed. A possible explanation for the partial effect of CD4 T cell depletion is that the level of depletion may have been slightly different for each rat and the survivors had more residual cells. It is also possible that the challenge dose varied slightly for each rat and the survivors had been challenged with a lower dose.

With the growing awareness of the importance of antibodies for effective immunity against pneumonic tularemia, new vaccine designs are beginning to incorporate antibodies or elements that induce stronger antibody responses. For example, antibodies against LPS have been used to enhance antigen presentation by targeting inactivated LVS to Fc receptors on myeloid cells (34). Cholera toxin B (3) and a LVS O-polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid glycoconjugate (39) were used to induce a better antibody response to augment the cellular immunity generated with inactivated or mutant LVS. Several groups have also used protein microarrays (17, 41) and immunoproteomic approaches (23, 43) to identify immunoreactive antibodies in serum from humans and mice with previous exposure to F. tularensis. In order to further improve these novel vaccine designs and to develop antibodies into potential ancillary therapeutic agents, it will be necessary to characterize the protective response associated with any potential antibody candidate. The fact that F344 rats were consistently protected by immune serum alone suggests that the F344 rat model will be a valuable tool not only to test the protective effect of these antibodies but also to characterize their mechanism of protection.

In conclusion, our studies showed that LVS vaccination induced serum antibodies that were protective against a lethal respiratory SCHU S4 infection. The protective responses defined in these studies provide valuable insights into the mechanism of antibody-mediated protection and will help guide the rational design of novel tularemia vaccines that induce not only a robust cellular immunity but also a strong humoral immunity.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jason Zsemyle and Gloria Statom for their excellent technical assistance, Ronald Schrader for assistance with statistical analysis of bacterial growth kinetics, and Mary F. Lipscomb for critical review of the manuscript and advice.

This project was funded with federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract no. HHSN266200500040C, and Public Health Service grant PO1 AI056295.

Editor: R. P. Morrison

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 31 January 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allen, W. P. 1962. Immunity against tularemia: passive protection of mice by transfer of immune tissues. J. Exp. Med. 115:411-420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baron, S. D., R. Singh, and D. W. Metzger. 2007. Inactivated Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain protects against respiratory tularemia by intranasal vaccination in an immunoglobulin A-dependent fashion. Infect. Immun. 75:2152-2162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bitsaktsis, C., et al. 2009. Differential requirements for protection against mucosal challenge with Francisella tularensis in the presence versus absence of cholera toxin B and inactivated F. tularensis. J. Immunol. 182:4899-4909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bokhari, S. M., et al. 2008. NK cells and gamma interferon coordinate the formation and function of hepatic granulomas in mice infected with the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect. Immun. 76:1379-1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen, W., H. Shen, A. Webb, R. KuoLee, and J. W. Conlan. 2003. Tularemia in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice vaccinated with Francisella tularensis LVS and challenged intradermally, or by aerosol with virulent isolates of the pathogen: protection varies depending on pathogen virulence, route of exposure, and host genetic background. Vaccine 21:3690-3700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cole, L. E., et al. 2006. Immunologic consequences of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain infection: role of the innate immune response in infection and immunity. J. Immunol. 176:6888-6899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cole, L. E., et al. 2009. Antigen-specific B-1a antibodies induced by Francisella tularensis LPS provide long-term protection against F. tularensis LVS challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:4343-4348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Conlan, J. W., W. Chen, H. Shen, A. Webb, and R. KuoLee. 2003. Experimental tularemia in mice challenged by aerosol or intradermally with virulent strains of Francisella tularensis: bacteriologic and histopathologic studies. Microb. Pathog. 34:239-248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conlan, J. W., and R. J. North. 1992. Early pathogenesis of infection in the liver with the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Francisella tularensis, and Salmonella typhimurium involves lysis of infected hepatocytes by leukocytes. Infect. Immun. 60:5164-5171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.de Jong, W. H., et al. 1980. The athymic nude rat. III. Natural cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 17:163-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dennis, D. T., et al. 2001. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 285:2763-2773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De Pascalis, R., B. C. Taylor, and K. L. Elkins. 2008. Diverse myeloid and lymphoid cell subpopulations produce gamma interferon during early innate immune responses to Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect. Immun. 76:4311-4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Drabick, J. J., R. B. Narayanan, J. C. Williams, J. W. Leduc, and C. A. Nacy. 1994. Passive protection of mice against lethal Francisella tularensis (live tularemia vaccine strain) infection by the sera of human recipients of the live tularemia vaccine. Am. J. Med. Sci. 308:83-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dreisbach, V. C., S. Cowley, and K. L. Elkins. 2000. Purified lipopolysaccharide from Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) induces protective immunity against LVS infection that requires B cells and gamma interferon. Infect. Immun. 68:1988-1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elkins, K. L., C. M. Bosio, and T. R. Rhinehart-Jones. 1999. Importance of B cells, but not specific antibodies, in primary and secondary protective immunity to the intracellular bacterium Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain. Infect. Immun. 67:6002-6007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.El Sahly, H. M., et al. 2009. Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain in humans. Vaccine 27:4905-4911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eyles, J. E., et al. 2007. Immunodominant Francisella tularensis antigens identified using proteome microarray. Proteomics 7:2172-2183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Forestal, C. A., et al. 2007. Francisella tularensis has a significant extracellular phase in infected mice. J. Infect. Dis. 196:134-137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fortier, A. H., M. V. Slayter, R. Ziemba, M. S. Meltzer, and C. A. Nacy. 1991. Live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis: infection and immunity in mice. Infect. Immun. 59:2922-2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fulop, M., R. Manchee, and R. Titball. 1996. Role of two outer membrane antigens in the induction of protective immunity against Francisella tularensis strains of different virulence. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 13:245-247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fulop, M., P. Mastroeni, M. Green, and R. W. Titball. 2001. Role of antibody to lipopolysaccharide in protection against low- and high-virulence strains of Francisella tularensis. Vaccine 19:4465-4472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao, B., W. I. Jeong, and Z. Tian. 2008. Liver: an organ with predominant innate immunity. Hepatology 47:729-736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Havlasova, J., et al. 2005. Proteomic analysis of anti-Francisella tularensis LVS antibody response in murine model of tularemia. Proteomics 5:2090-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Herberman, R. B., and H. T. Holden. 1979. Natural killer cells as antitumor effector cells. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 62:441-445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ishibashi, H., M. Nakamura, A. Komori, K. Migita, and S. Shimoda. 2009. Liver architecture, cell function, and disease. Semin. Immunopathol. 31:399-409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kirimanjeswara, G. S., J. M. Golden, C. S. Bakshi, and D. W. Metzger. 2007. Prophylactic and therapeutic use of antibodies for protection against respiratory infection with Francisella tularensis. J. Immunol. 179:532-539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klimpel, G. R., et al. 2008. Levofloxacin rescues mice from lethal intra-nasal infections with virulent Francisella tularensis and induces immunity and production of protective antibody. Vaccine 26:6874-6882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kugeler, K. J., et al. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Francisella tularensis in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:863-870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lavine, C. L., et al. 2007. Immunization with heat-killed Francisella tularensis LVS elicits protective antibody-mediated immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 37:3007-3020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lu, Z., et al. 2007. Generation and characterization of hybridoma antibodies for immunotherapy of tularemia. Immunol. Lett. 112:92-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Narayanan, R. B., et al. 1993. Immunotherapy of tularemia: characterization of a monoclonal antibody reactive with Francisella tularensis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 53:112-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nelson, M., et al. 2009. Establishment of lethal inhalational infection with Francisella tularensis (tularaemia) in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 90:109-118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pannell, L., and C. M. Downs. 1953. Studies on the pathogenesis and immunity of tularemia. I. The demonstration of a protective antibody in mouse serum. J. Infect. Dis. 92:195-204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rawool, D. B., et al. 2008. Utilization of Fc receptors as a mucosal vaccine strategy against an intracellular bacterium, Francisella tularensis. J. Immunol. 180:5548-5557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ray, H. J., et al. 2009. Oral live vaccine strain-induced protective immunity against pulmonary Francisella tularensis challenge is mediated by CD4+ T cells and antibodies, including immunoglobulin A. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16:444-452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rhinehart-Jones, T. R., A. H. Fortier, and K. L. Elkins. 1994. Transfer of immunity against lethal murine Francisella infection by specific antibody depends on host gamma interferon and T cells. Infect. Immun. 62:3129-3137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saslaw, S., H. T. Eigelsbach, J. A. Prior, H. E. Wilson, and S. Carhart. 1961. Tularemia vaccine study. II. Respiratory challenge. Arch. Intern. Med. 107:702-714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Savitt, A. G., P. Mena-Taboada, G. Monsalve, and J. L. Benach. 2009. Francisella tularensis infection-derived monoclonal antibodies provide detection, protection, and therapy. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 16:414-422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sebastian, S., et al. 2009. Cellular and humoral immunity are synergistic in protection against types A and B Francisella tularensis. Vaccine 27:597-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stenmark, S., H. Lindgren, A. Tarnvik, and A. Sjostedt. 2003. Specific antibodies contribute to the host protection against strains of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica. Microb. Pathog. 35:73-80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sundaresh, S., et al. 2007. From protein microarrays to diagnostic antigen discovery: a study of the pathogen Francisella tularensis. Bioinformatics 23:i508-i518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Twenhafel, N. A., D. A. Alves, and B. K. Purcell. 2009. Pathology of inhalational Francisella tularensis spp. tularensis SCHU S4 infection in African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops). Vet. Pathol. 46:698-706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Twine, S. M., et al. 2006. Immunoproteomic analysis of the murine antibody response to successful and failed immunization with live anti-Francisella vaccines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 346:999-1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Waag, D. M., et al. 1992. Cell-mediated and humoral immune responses induced by scarification vaccination of human volunteers with a new lot of the live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2256-2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wu, T. H., et al. 2009. Vaccination of Fischer 344 rats against pulmonary infections by Francisella tularensis type A strains. Vaccine 27:4684-4693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES