Abstract
The important human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus is known to spread on soft agar plates. Here, we show that colony spreading of S. aureus involves the agr quorum-sensing system. This finding can be related to the agr-dependent expression of biosurfactants, such as phenol-soluble modulins, suggesting a connection between spreading motility and virulence.
The Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus is frequently encountered among the human microbiota (41). For most individuals, S. aureus is an apparently harmless commensal. However, once S. aureus passes the primary barriers imposed by the human skin or mucosa, it becomes evident that this organism is in fact a dangerous pathogen. S. aureus is then capable of infecting almost every tissue and organ, causing a wide range of acute and chronic diseases (16, 31). This ability to cause infections depends on a diverse array of cell wall-associated and extracellular virulence factors (44, 49, 64). The expression of many S. aureus virulence genes is coordinated by the accessory gene regulator (agr) quorum-sensing system (33, 42, 46), which responds to cell density-dependent stimuli. At high cell densities or in confined compartments, this system upregulates the expression of secreted virulence factors and downregulates the expression of cell wall-associated virulence factors (38-40, 42). Consequently, cell wall proteins and surface adhesins are expressed during the early, colonizing stages of infection whereas secreted proteins, such as hemolysins, lipases, and proteases, are expressed at later, tissue-damaging stages (14). Notably, when S. aureus is cultured in vitro, all hemolysins are upregulated at the transition from the late exponential to the stationary phase (38-40, 42, 64).
Activity of the agr system involves two major transcripts named RNAII and RNAIII. RNAII covers the agrABCD operon. The membrane protein AgrB is involved in (i) processing of the AgrD product into the activating auto-inducing octa-peptide AIP, (ii) secretion of AIP, and (iii) modification of AIP. AgrC is a histidine kinase that binds the extracellular AIP and, in turn, modulates the activity of the response regulator AgrA, which determines the synthesis of RNAII and RNAIII (14, 38-40, 63). RNAIII is the effector molecule of the agr locus that upregulates the transcription and, in some cases, the translation of secreted proteins (2, 37). Conversely, RNAIII downregulates the transcription of cell wall-associated proteins (11). Furthermore, the 5′ end of RNAIII encodes the toxin δ-hemolysin (also known as phenol-soluble modulin γ [PSMγ]).
Bacterial pathogens often employ motility mechanisms for host colonization. Almost 40 years ago, Henrichsen made a distinction among six different categories of bacterial surface motility, which he referred to as swimming, swarming, gliding, twitching, sliding, and darting (18). Swimming and swarming are dependent on flagella, whereas twitching has been shown to require type IV pili, as do some forms of gliding. Sliding and darting are forms of passive bacterial movement (16). Sliding is correlated with the production of surfactants, such as lipopeptides, lipopolysaccharides (LPS), or glycolipids (16). It was proposed that expansion forces of dividing S. aureus cells cause the motility phenomenon that was named darting motility (18). More recently, a different form of S. aureus motility was defined as colony spreading (18, 26), which resembles sliding, as it is independent of flagella or pili. In 2008 the so-called fudoh gene was implicated in the inhibition of colony spreading (25). This gene is present on the type II and III staphylococcal chromosomal cassettes mec (SCCmec) of certain methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains (25) but not on the six other presently known types of SCCmec (i.e., types I and IV to VIII) (7-9, 23). The underlying mechanisms of colony spreading as well as the precise role of the fudoh gene in this process have thus far remained elusive. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to define key determinants for colony spreading of S. aureus.
Correlation between staphylococcal colony spreading and the quorum-sensing system agr.
To determine which genetic features are important for colony spreading, a collection of MRSA and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains with different characteristics (Table 1) were tested for the ability to spread on tryptic soy soft agar plates (0.24% agar). The spreading assay was performed as described by Kaito et al. (25, 26) with minor modifications. Each plate (capacity, 10 ml) was dried for approximately 10 min in a laminar flow cabinet. From an overnight culture in tryptic soy broth, an aliquot of 2 μl was spotted in the center of a plate, which was subsequently dried for 5 min under laminar flow. The plates were then incubated overnight at 37°C. Images were recorded with a G:Box (Syngene, Leusden, Netherlands). The results are summarized in Table 2, and some representative images are presented in Fig. 1. When the ability to spread was compared to other features of the tested strains, it became apparent that there was a clear correlation between spreading and the presence of an intact agr system for quorum sensing (Table 2). For example, it was shown previously that S. aureus NCTC8325, MRSA252, MSSA476, MW2, RF122, Newman, and USA300 express RNAIII (19, 50). These strains were clearly able to spread. S. aureus COL expresses low levels of RNAIII due to an agr defect (19, 50), and our results show that this strain has minimal spreading ability (Table 2). The heavily mutagenized S. aureus strain RN4220 has a mutation in agrA which results in an agr-deficient phenotype. Consistent with the notion that agr might have a role in colony spreading, our results show that S. aureus RN4220 does not spread (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we tested clinical S. aureus isolates from patients with different staphylococcal infections (65). Previous analyses had shown that not all of these strains express RNAIII (65). Our present results show that all agr+ clinical isolates do spread but that the agr-deficient isolates are unable to spread (Table 2).
TABLE 1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids
Strain or plasmid | Descriptiona | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Strains | ||
NCTC8325 | HA-MSSA strain; agr+rsbU | 35 |
NCTC8325− | HA-MSSA strain; agrrsbU | This work |
NCTC8325-4 | Derivative of NCTC8325, cured of all prophages; carries 11-bp deletion in rsbU | 36 |
NCTC8325-4 agr | NCTC8325-4 derivative; agr::tet | 6 |
RN4220 | Restriction-deficient derivative of NCTC8325, cured of all known prophages | 28 |
SH1000 | NCTC8325-4 derivative; rsbU+agr+ | 22 |
SH1000− | NCTC8325-4 derivative; rsbU+agr | This work |
HG001 | NCTC8325 derivative; rsbU+agr+ | 43 |
HG001− | NCTC8325 derivative; rsbU+agr | This work |
RN6390 | NCTC8325 derivative, cured of prophages | 42 |
RN6911 | RN6390 derivative; agr::tetMsarA+ Tcr | 34 |
SA113 | ATCC 35556 derivative; PIA-dependent biofilm producer | 24 |
15981 | Clinical isolate; positive for biofilm production in TSBg | 53 |
Newman | ATCC 25904; exhibits high-level clumping factor production; σB+ | 12 |
Newman Δagr | Newman derivative; Δagr::tetM | 59 |
N315 | MRSA | 29 |
COL | MRSA | 15, 47 |
Isolate C | HA-MRSA | 65 |
Isolate D | HA-MRSA | 65 |
Isolate E | HA-MSSA | 65 |
Isolate F | HA-MSSA | 65 |
Isolate R | CA-MSSA | 65 |
Isolate V | CA-MSSA | 65 |
Isolate X | HA-MSSA | 65 |
Isolate Y | HA-MRSA | 65 |
UMCG-M2 | CA-MSSA strain (formerly referred to as isolate A); resulted from in vivo MRSA-to-MSSA conversion of strain UMCG-M4 | 7, 65 |
UMCG-M4 | CA-MRSA strain (also referred to as isolate B) | 7, 65 |
UMCG-M4 I | MRSA strain; derivative of the UMCG-M4 strain that lost hemolysin activity upon in vitro cultivation at 41°C | 7 |
USA300 | CA-MRSA | 10 |
LAC USA300 | CA-MRSA | 58 |
LAC USA300 ΔPSMα | LAC USA300 with a PSMα gene locus deletion | 58 |
Mu50 | HA-VISA | 29 |
MRSA252 | HA-MRSA | 21 |
MSSA476 | CA-MSSA | 21 |
MW2 | CA-MRSA | 3 |
RF122 | Bovine mastitis isolate | 20 |
Plasmids | ||
pRN6662 | pSK267 with S. aureusagrA | 1 |
pALC2073RNAIII | pALC2073 with RNAIII coding region | 54 |
HA, hospital-acquired; PIA, polysaccharide intercellular adhesin; TSBg, tryptic soy broth with glucose; CA, community-acquired; VISA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus.
TABLE 2.
Properties of investigated S. aureus strains in relation to colony spreading and hemolytic activity
Strain | Description | Presence or absence of: |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spreadinga | agrb | Hemolysis | rsbU | SCCmec or other SCC elementc | fudoh | ||
NCTC8325 | HA-MSSA | + | + | + | − | − | − |
RN4220 | MSSA | − | − | − | − | − | − |
SH1000 | MSSA | + | + | + | + | − | − |
NCTC8325-4 | MSSA | + | + | + | − | − | − |
HG001 | MSSA | + | + | + | + | − | − |
RN6390 | MSSA | + | + | + | − | − | − |
RN6911 Δagr::tetM | MSSA | − | − | − | − | − | − |
SA113 | MSSA | − | − | − | − | − | − |
15981 | MSSA | − | − | − | + | − | − |
Newman | MSSA | + | + | + | + | − | − |
N315 | HA-MRSA | − | − | − | Unknown | II | + |
COL | HA-MRSA | +/− | +/− | − | + | I | − |
UMCG-M2 (isolate A) | CA-MSSA | + | + | + | Unknown | − | − |
UMCG-M4 (isolate B) | CA-MRSA | + | + | + | Unknown | V(5C2&5) | − |
Isolate C | HA-MRSA | − | − | − | Unknown | Unknown | − |
Isolate D | HA-MRSA | − | − | − | Unknown | Unknown | − |
Isolate E | HA-MSSA | + | + | + | Unknown | − | − |
Isolate F | HA-MSSA | + | + | + | Unknown | − | − |
Isolate R | CA-MSSA | + | + | + | Unknown | − | − |
Isolate V | CA-MSSA | + | + | + | Unknown | − | − |
Isolate X | HA-MSSA | − | − | − | Unknown | − | − |
Isolate Y | HA-MRSA | − | − | − | Unknown | Unknown | − |
USA300 | CA-MRSA | + | + | + | + | IV | − |
LAC USA300 | CA-MRSA | + | + | + | Unknown | IV | − |
Mu50 | HA-VISA | − | − | − | + | II | + |
MRSA252 | HA-MRSA | + | + | − | + | II | + |
MSSA476 | CA-MSSA | + | + | + | + | SCChsd | − |
MW2 | CA-MRSA | + | + | + | + | IV | − |
RF122 | Bovine mastitis isolate | + | + | + | + | − | − |
+/−, strain showed minimal spreading ability.
+/−, agr is present but defective.
For strains with SCC elements, the type or identity is given.
FIG. 1.
Colony spreading of different S. aureus strains on soft agar plates. From an overnight culture, an aliquot of 2 μl was spotted in the middle of a tryptic soy agar (TSA) plate, which was then incubated overnight at 37°C. The analyses include standard laboratory strains of S. aureus (i.e., RN4220, SH1000, and HG001), as well as community-acquired (i.e., USA300) and hospital-acquired (i.e., N315, Mu50, MRSA252, and Newman) strains.
The agr system controls the expression of staphylococcal hemolysins via RNAIII. Lack of hemolytic activity is typical for strains with agr defects and mutants with delayed agr activation (51). To confirm the correlation between colony spreading and agr activity, all strains used in this study were tested for hemolytic activity on 5% sheep blood agar plates (13) (Table 2). The α- and β-hemolysin activities were directly detectable on blood agar plates. The production of δ-hemolysin was detected by measuring its synergistic activity with the β-hemolysin produced by strain RN4220, which at the same time inhibits the α-hemolysin. Thus, the synergistic activity of β- and δ-hemolysins is reflected by bright arrow-like zones on blood agar plates when the respective strains are striped in close proximity to each other (1). As expected, all strains with a functional agr locus showed clear δ-hemolysin activity, which directly confirmed the production of RNAIII.
An intact agr system is required for colony spreading.
Somerville et al. reported that during growth under aerobic conditions, spontaneous mutations in agr occur, thereby creating mixed bacterial populations with cells that are either alpha-hemolytic or nonhemolytic (50). Notably, this population heterogeneity occurs not only in laboratory cultures, but also in vivo, where it may enhance the ability of S. aureus to withstand the stress and insults imposed by the human immune defenses (4, 32, 50, 51). By plating agr+ strains onto blood agar plates, we also observed this population heterogeneity, which we exploited to test whether the nonhemolytic cells had also lost the ability to spread. This analysis is exemplified for nonhemolytic variants of the laboratory strain SH1000 (designated SH1000−) and the clinical isolate UMCG-M4 (designated UMCG-M4 I) (Table 3 ). Spontaneous agr mutations are known to arise preferentially in the coding region of agrC or the intergenic region between agrC and agrA, thereby preventing the translation of agrA (1, 51). This pattern implies that agr defects can be complemented at least partially by ectopic expression of RNAIII and, in some cases, also by ectopic agrA expression (1, 54). Accordingly, we performed a complementation analysis to verify the requirement of an intact agr system for colony spreading by using the agrA mutant S. aureus strain RN4220 and the spontaneous agr mutant SH1000−. Both strains were complemented with the pALC2073RNAIII plasmid for RNAIII expression or pRN6662 for expression of an intact agrA gene (39). As shown in Fig. 2A, both complemented strains carrying pALC2073RNAIII or pRN6662 were able to spread. It should be noticed, however, that the spreading abilities of the strains RN4220 and SH1000− complemented with agrA and/or RNAIII were less pronounced than those of known agr+ strains (Fig. 1). The hemolytic activities of the complemented strains were also partially restored (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these results show unambiguously that an intact agr system is required for colony spreading of S. aureus (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
S. aureus strains used to confirm the roles of agr in colony spreading and hemolytic activity
Strain | Methicillin resistance phenotype | Presence or absence of: |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spreading | agr | Hemolysis | rsbU | SCCmeca | fudoh | ||
NCTC8325− | MSSA | − | − | − | − | − | − |
RN4220(pRN6662) | MSSA | + | Restored | + | − | − | − |
RN4220(pALC2073RNAIII) | MSSA | + | Restored | + | − | − | − |
SH1000− | MSSA | − | − | − | + | − | − |
SH1000−(pRN6662) | MSSA | + | Restored | + | + | − | − |
NCTC8325-4 agr | MSSA | − | − | − | − | − | − |
HG001− | MSSA | − | − | − | + | − | − |
Newman Δagr | MSSA | − | − | − | + | − | − |
UMCG-M4 I | MRSA | − | − | − | Unknown | V(5C2&5) | − |
For the strain with SCCmec, the type is given.
FIG. 2.
Involvement of the S. aureus agr system and phenol-soluble modulins in colony spreading. To complement the agr mutations in S. aureus strains RN4220 and SH1000−, the respective cells were transformed either with plasmid pALC2073RNAIII for RNAIII production or with plasmid pRN6662 for AgrA production. (A) Colony spreading by complemented agr mutant strains of S. aureus. wt, wild type. (B) Hemolysis by the agr+ strain S. aureus SH1000, an agr-deficient variant of SH1000 (SH1000−), and a variant complemented with agr [SH1000−(pRN6662)]. Note that hemolysis was partially restored in the S. aureus agr-deficient strain upon introduction of pRN6662, carrying agrA.
In contrast to agr, rsbU mutations or the presence of SCCmec elements showed no obvious correlations with colony spreading (Fig. 1). The lack of detectable effects of rsbU mutations means that reduced levels of the accessory sigma factor B (σB) do not have a strong impact on spreading (22, 60). More noticeable was the observation that the S. aureus MRSA252 strain, which carries SCCmec type II with a fudoh gene, did spread on soft agar plates (Fig. 1). This was an unexpected finding, as Kaito et al. (26) have reported that the presence of the fudoh gene in SCCmec type II would suppress the colony-spreading phenotype of MRSA strains (25). In line with this idea, the tested strains N315 and Mu50, which carry the fudoh gene within the type II SCCmec, were indeed unable to spread (Fig. 1). However, the strains N315 and Mu50 are agr deficient, whereas MRSA252 carries agr+, which suggests that agr is more generally important for spreading than the fudoh gene. The latter view is consistent with our finding that agr is a key determinant for spreading in MSSA strains (Tables 2 and 3).
The agr-deficient phenotype of S. aureus has been connected with the enhancement of biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo, where agr mutants form thicker biofilms than agr+ strains (27, 55-57, 61, 62). Indeed, all tested agr-deficient strains were stronger biofilm formers than their agr+ counterparts, and this finding was true even for the RN4220 strain complemented with agrA or RNAIII (data not shown). Furthermore, it was reported previously that upregulation of RNAIII is associated with the escape of S. aureus from biofilms grown in flow cells (61). These findings suggest that the agr system plays a decisive role in the choice of S. aureus cells between a sessile and a nonsessile lifestyle. Specifically, Boles and Horswill showed that agr-deficient cells have the ability to attach to surfaces and form biofilm due to the low expression levels of detachment factors such as hydrolases, proteases, and surfactants (5). Surfactants are especially interesting in this respect, because surfactant molecules lower the surface tension of surface-air interfaces, thereby improving surface wettability, which allows liquids to spread on hydrophobic surfaces. This property of surfactants could be directly connected to colony spreading since the surface motility of bacteria is dependent on moist conditions (16). Notably, the δ-hemolysin (PSMγ) encoded by RNAIII has strong surfactant properties (17, 56). This would directly link RNAIII production to colony spreading. Additionally, all other PSMs of S. aureus have surfactant properties and these properties are tightly controlled by the agr system (11, 45). To test the possible involvement of such compounds, we tested colony spreading for a mutant of S. aureus strain LAC USA300 lacking the psm-α operon (kindly provided by M. Otto). Indeed, the spreading ability of this mutant was strongly reduced compared to that of the parental LAC USA300 strain, and spreading of the mutant strain was restored by addition of the four chemically synthesized PSMα peptides (Fig. 3). This result directly shows the involvement of the PSMα peptides in colony spreading. Importantly, these PSMs have been implicated in leukocyte killing, which suggests a potential connection between spreading motility and staphylococcal virulence (58).
FIG. 3.
Phenol-soluble modulins α promote colony spreading. The role of PSMs in colony spreading was tested with the S. aureus LAC USA300 ΔPSMα strain, which lacks all four PSMα peptides. As a control, the parental strain, S. aureus LAC USA300 (marked wt), was used. To verify that the spreading defect of S. aureus LAC USA300 ΔPSMα was due to the absence of the PSMα peptides, spreading was tested upon addition of a mixture of the four chemically synthesized PSMα peptides to the cells. PSMα1 to PSMα4, each with a C-terminal four-residue glycine spacer and an ɛ-amino biotinyl lysine, were synthesized by standard 9-fluorenylmethoxy carbonyl (Fmoc) solid-phase peptide synthesis. The crude peptides were purified by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and the molecular masses of the peptides were confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. The purified PSMα1 to PSMα4 peptides were then dissolved in a mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) to yield a final concentration of 15 mM (each). For the present experiment, the α1, α2, α3, and α4 peptides were mixed in a 4.4:1:1.5:2.5 ratio, which is in accordance with the ratios of these peptides encountered in the medium of S. aureus USA300 (30). Next, the mixture was diluted 10-fold in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Twenty microliters of an overnight culture of the ΔPSMα mutant strain was centrifuged and subsequently resuspended in 20 μl of the diluted peptide mixture (yielding the sample labeled ΔPSMα-complemented). As a control, ΔPSMα cells were resuspended in 20 μl of PBS with a 10-fold dilution of 10 mM DTT in DMSO without the PSMα1 to PSMα4 peptides. Aliquots of 2 μl of the resuspended cells were added to soft agar plates to test colony spreading. All experiments were performed in duplicate and repeated three times.
General conclusion and outlook.
Taken together, our present findings show that an intact agr system is required for the movement of S. aureus over surface-air interfaces by colony spreading. A key question that remains to be answered in future studies is whether agr-dependent colony spreading plays a role during S. aureus infections. Clearly, many examples of the coexistence of agr+ and agr-deficient variants of S. aureus in vivo have been reported previously (48, 52, 57). This coexistence may suggest a division of tasks within an infecting S. aureus population, where nonsessile agr+ cells would have relatively high potentials for spreading over surfaces and growing invasively while sessile agr-deficient cells would have a relatively high potential for colonization, possibly through the formation of biofilms.
Acknowledgments
E.T., M.J.J.B.S., M.A.C., A.D., J.W.B., E.L.D., G.B., and J.M.V.D. were supported in part by the CEU projects LSHM-CT-2006-019064 and LSHG-CT-2006-037469, the transnational SysMO initiative through BACELL SysMO projects 1 and 2, and the Top Institute Pharma project T4-213.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 17 December 2010.
REFERENCES
- 1.Adhikari, R. P., S. Arvidson, and R. P. Novick. 2007. A nonsense mutation in agrA accounts for the defect in agr expression and the avirulence of Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4 traP::kan. Infect. Immun. 75:4534-4540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arvidson, S., and K. Tegmark. 2001. Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:159-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Baba, T., et al. 2002. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 359:1819-1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Björklind, A., and S. Arvidson. 1980. Mutants of Staphylococcus aureus affected in the regulation of exoprotein synthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 7:202-206. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boles, B. R., and A. R. Horswill. 2008. agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS. Pathog. 4:e1000052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chan, P. F., and S. J. Foster. 1998. The role of environmental factors in the regulation of virulence-determinant expression in Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. Microbiology 144(Pt. 9):2469-2479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chlebowicz, M. A., et al. 2010. Recombination between ccrC genes in a type V (5C2&5) staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 leads to conversion from methicillin resistance to methicillin susceptibility in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:783-791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chongtrakool, P., et al. 2006. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in 11 Asian countries: a proposal for a new nomenclature for SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1001-1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Deurenberg, R. H., and E. E. Stobberingh. 2008. The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 8:747-763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Diep, B. A., et al. 2006. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367:731-739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dunman, P. M., et al. 2001. Transcription profiling-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes regulated by the agr and/or sarA loci. J. Bacteriol. 183:7341-7353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Duthie, E. S., and L. L. Lorenz. 1952. Staphylococcal coagulase; mode of action and antigenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 6:95-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Elek, S. D., and E. Levy. 1950. Distribution of haemolysins in pathogenic and non-pathogenic staphylococci. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 62:541-554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.George, E. A., and T. W. Muir. 2007. Molecular mechanisms of agr quorum sensing in virulent staphylococci. Chembiochem 8:847-855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gill, S. R., et al. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J. Bacteriol. 187:2426-2438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harshey, R. M. 2003. Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:249-273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Heatley, N. G. 1971. A new method for the preparation and some properties of staphylococcal δ-haemolysin. J. Gen. Microbiol. 69:269-278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henrichsen, J. 1972. Bacterial surface translocation: a survey and a classification. Bacteriol. Rev. 36:478-503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Herbert, S., et al. 2010. Repair of global regulators in Staphylococcus aureus 8325 and comparative analysis with other clinical isolates. Infect. Immun. 78:2877-2889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Herron, L. L., et al. 2002. Genome sequence survey identifies unique sequences and key virulence genes with unusual rates of amino acid substitution in bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 70:3978-3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Holden, M. T., et al. 2004. Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:9786-9791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horsburgh, M. J., et al. 2002. σB modulates virulence determinant expression and stress resistance: characterization of a functional rsbU strain derived from Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. J. Bacteriol. 184:5457-5467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC). 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4961-4967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iordanescu, S., and M. Surdeanu. 1976. Two restriction and modification systems in Staphylococcus aureus NCTC8325. J. Gen. Microbiol. 96:277-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaito, C., et al. 2008. A novel gene, fudoh, in the SCCmec region suppresses the colony spreading ability and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 3:e3921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kaito, C., and K. Sekimizu. 2007. Colony spreading in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 189:2553-2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kong, K. F., C. Vuong, and M. Otto. 2006. Staphylococcus quorum sensing in biofilm formation and infection. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296:133-139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kreiswirth, B. N., et al. 1983. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature 305:709-712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kuroda, M., et al. 2001. Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1225-1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li, M., et al. 2009. Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:5883-5888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lowy, F. D. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:520-532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McNamara, P. J., and J. J. Iandolo. 1998. Genetic instability of the global regulator agr explains the phenotype of the xpr mutation in Staphylococcus aureus KSI9051. J. Bacteriol. 180:2609-2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Morfeldt, E., L. Janzon, S. Arvidson, and S. Löfdahl. 1988. Cloning of a chromosomal locus (exp) which regulates the expression of several exoprotein genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:435-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nesin, M., et al. 1990. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of a chromosomally encoded tetracycline resistance determinant, tetA(M), from a pathogenic, methicillin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:2273-2276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Novick, R. 1967. Properties of a cryptic high-frequency transducing phage in Staphylococcus aureus. Virology 33:155-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Novick, R. P. 1990. The staphylococcus as a molecular genetic system, p. 1-37. In R. P. Novick (ed.), Molecular biology of the staphylococci. VCH Publishers, New York, NY.
- 37.Novick, R. P. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1429-1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Novick, R. P., and E. Geisinger. 2008. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42:541-564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Novick, R. P., et al. 1995. The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:446-458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Novick, R. P., et al. 1993. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 12:3967-3975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Peacock, S. J., I. de Silva, and F. D. Lowy. 2001. What determines nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? Trends Microbiol. 9:605-610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peng, H. L., R. P. Novick, B. Kreiswirth, J. Kornblum, and P. Schlievert. 1988. Cloning, characterization, and sequencing of an accessory gene regulator (agr) in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 170:4365-4372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pohl, K., et al. 2009. CodY in Staphylococcus aureus: a regulatory link between metabolism and virulence gene expression. J. Bacteriol. 191:2953-2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Projan, S. J., S. Brown-Skrobot, P. M. Schlievert, F. Vandenesch, and R. P. Novick. 1994. Glycerol monolaurate inhibits the production of β-lactamase, toxic shock toxin-1, and other staphylococcal exoproteins by interfering with signal transduction. J. Bacteriol. 176:4204-4209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Queck, S. Y., et al. 2009. Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS. Pathog. 5:e1000533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Recsei, P., et al. 1986. Regulation of exoprotein gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by agar. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:58-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shafer, W. M., and J. J. Iandolo. 1979. Genetics of staphylococcal enterotoxin B in methicillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 25:902-911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shopsin, B., et al. 2008. Prevalence of agr dysfunction among colonizing Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Infect. Dis. 198:1171-1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sibbald, M. J., et al. 2006. Mapping the pathways to staphylococcal pathogenesis by comparative secretomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:755-788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Somerville, G. A., et al. 2002. In vitro serial passage of Staphylococcus aureus: changes in physiology, virulence factor production, and agr nucleotide sequence. J. Bacteriol. 184:1430-1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Traber, K., and R. Novick. 2006. A slipped-mispairing mutation in AgrA of laboratory strains and clinical isolates results in delayed activation of agr and failure to translate δ- and α-haemolysins. Mol. Microbiol. 59:1519-1530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Traber, K. E., et al. 2008. agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiology 154:2265-2274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Valle, J., et al. 2003. SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1075-1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vergara-Irigaray, M., et al. 2009. Relevant role of fibronectin-binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated foreign-body infections. Infect. Immun. 77:3978-3991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Vuong, C., et al. 2004. Regulated expression of pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules in Staphylococcus epidermidis: quorum-sensing determines pro-inflammatory capacity and production of phenol-soluble modulins. Cell. Microbiol. 6:753-759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vuong, C., S. Kocianova, Y. Yao, A. B. Carmody, and M. Otto. 2004. Increased colonization of indwelling medical devices by quorum-sensing mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 190:1498-1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vuong, C., H. L. Saenz, F. Gotz, and M. Otto. 2000. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1688-1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang, R., et al. 2007. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat. Med. 13:1510-1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wolz, C., D. McDevitt, T. J. Foster, and A. L. Cheung. 1996. Influence of agr on fibrinogen binding in Staphylococcus aureus Newman. Infect. Immun. 64:3142-3147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu, S., H. de Lencastre, and A. Tomasz. 1996. Sigma-B, a putative operon encoding alternate sigma factor of Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase: molecular cloning and DNA sequencing. J. Bacteriol. 178:6036-6042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yao, Y., D. E. Sturdevant, and M. Otto. 2005. Genomewide analysis of gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: insights into the pathophysiology of S. epidermidis biofilms and the role of phenol-soluble modulins in formation of biofilms. J. Infect. Dis. 191:289-298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yarwood, J. M., D. J. Bartels, E. M. Volper, and E. P. Greenberg. 2004. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186:1838-1850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yarwood, J. M., and P. M. Schlievert. 2003. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus infections. J. Clin. Invest. 112:1620-1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ziebandt, A. K., et al. 2004. The influence of agr and σB in growth phase dependent regulation of virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus. Proteomics 4:3034-3047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ziebandt, A. K., et al. 2010. Proteomics uncovers extreme heterogeneity in the Staphylococcus aureus exoproteome due to genomic plasticity and variant gene regulation. Proteomics 10:1634-1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]